Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1999 Jun 1;18(11):3173–3185. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.11.3173

RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.

R Gardner 1, C W Putnam 1, T Weinert 1
PMCID: PMC1171398  PMID: 10357828

Abstract

Eukaryotic checkpoint genes regulate multiple cellular responses to DNA damage. In this report, we examine the roles of budding yeast genes involved in G2/M arrest and tolerance to UV exposure. A current model posits three gene classes: those encoding proteins acting on damaged DNA (e.g. RAD9 and RAD24), those transducing a signal (MEC1, RAD53 and DUN1) or those participating more directly in arrest (PDS1). Here, we define important features of the pathways subserved by those genes. MEC1, which we find is required for both establishment and maintenance of G2/M arrest, mediates this arrest through two parallel pathways. One pathway requires RAD53 and DUN1 (the 'RAD53 pathway'); the other pathway requires PDS1. Each pathway independently contributes approximately 50% to G2/M arrest, effects demonstrable after cdc13-induced damage or a double-stranded break inflicted by the HO endonuclease. Similarly, both pathways contribute independently to tolerance of UV irradiation. How the parallel pathways might interact ultimately to achieve arrest is not yet understood, but we do provide evidence that neither the RAD53 nor the PDS1 pathway appears to maintain arrest by inhibiting adaptation. Instead, we think it likely that both pathways contribute to establishing and maintaining arrest.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (609.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen J. B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E. C., Elledge S. J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2401–2415. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amon A., Surana U., Muroff I., Nasmyth K. Regulation of p34CDC28 tyrosine phosphorylation is not required for entry into mitosis in S. cerevisiae. Nature. 1992 Jan 23;355(6358):368–371. doi: 10.1038/355368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson J. G. A detailed analysis of x-ray-induced prophase delay and reversion of grasshopper neuroblasts in culture. Radiat Res. 1969 Jan;37(1):1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlson J. G. X-ray-induced prophase delay and reversion of selected cells in certain avian and mammalian tissues in culture. Radiat Res. 1969 Jan;37(1):15–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr A. M. Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997 Feb;7(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(97)80115-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciosk R., Zachariae W., Michaelis C., Shevchenko A., Mann M., Nasmyth K. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell. 1998 Jun 12;93(6):1067–1076. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen-Fix O., Koshland D. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14361–14366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen-Fix O., Peters J. M., Kirschner M. W., Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 1996 Dec 15;10(24):3081–3093. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.24.3081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desany B. A., Alcasabas A. A., Bachant J. B., Elledge S. J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 1998 Sep 15;12(18):2956–2970. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.18.2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elledge S. J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science. 1996 Dec 6;274(5293):1664–1672. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 1998 Aug;2(2):183–189. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80128-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fay D. S., Sun Z., Stern D. F. Mutations in SPK1/RAD53 that specifically abolish checkpoint but not growth-related functions. Curr Genet. 1997 Feb;31(2):97–105. doi: 10.1007/s002940050181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferrell J. E., Jr, Machleder E. M. The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):895–898. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferrell J. E., Jr Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996 Dec;21(12):460–466. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(96)20026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Garvik B., Carson M., Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6128–6138. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Griffiths D. J., Barbet N. C., McCready S., Lehmann A. R., Carr A. M. Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins. EMBO J. 1995 Dec 1;14(23):5812–5823. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guacci V., Hogan E., Koshland D. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(3):517–530. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hari K. L., Santerre A., Sekelsky J. J., McKim K. S., Boyd J. B., Hawley R. S. The mei-41 gene of D. melanogaster is a structural and functional homolog of the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):815–821. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90478-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartwell L. H., Kastan M. B. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science. 1994 Dec 16;266(5192):1821–1828. doi: 10.1126/science.7997877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoekstra M. F. Responses to DNA damage and regulation of cell cycle checkpoints by the ATM protein kinase family. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997 Apr;7(2):170–175. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(97)80125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hofmann K., Bucher P. The FHA domain: a putative nuclear signalling domain found in protein kinases and transcription factors. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Sep;20(9):347–349. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89072-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang M., Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell. 1998 Sep 4;94(5):595–605. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81601-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin P., Hardy S., Morgan D. O. Nuclear localization of cyclin B1 controls mitotic entry after DNA damage. J Cell Biol. 1998 May 18;141(4):875–885. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kao G. D., McKenna W. G., Maity A., Blank K., Muschel R. J. Cyclin B1 availability is a rate-limiting component of the radiation-induced G2 delay in HeLa cells. Cancer Res. 1997 Feb 15;57(4):753–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiser G. L., Weinert T. A. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol Biol Cell. 1996 May;7(5):703–718. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li X., Cai M. Inactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28 abrogates cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage and disassembly of mitotic spindles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2723–2734. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin J. J., Zakian V. A. The Saccharomyces CDC13 protein is a single-strand TG1-3 telomeric DNA-binding protein in vitro that affects telomere behavior in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13760–13765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindsay H. D., Griffiths D. J., Edwards R. J., Christensen P. U., Murray J. M., Osman F., Walworth N., Carr A. M. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1;12(3):382–395. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Longhese M. P., Foiani M., Muzi-Falconi M., Lucchini G., Plevani P. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5525–5528. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lydall D., Nikolsky Y., Bishop D. K., Weinert T. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature. 1996 Oct 31;383(6603):840–843. doi: 10.1038/383840a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lydall D., Weinert T. G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair. Mol Gen Genet. 1997 Nov;256(6):638–651. doi: 10.1007/s004380050612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martinho R. G., Lindsay H. D., Flaggs G., DeMaggio A. J., Hoekstra M. F., Carr A. M., Bentley N. J. Analysis of Rad3 and Chk1 protein kinases defines different checkpoint responses. EMBO J. 1998 Dec 15;17(24):7239–7249. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Murakami H., Okayama H. A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):817–819. doi: 10.1038/374817a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nugent C. I., Hughes T. R., Lue N. F., Lundblad V. Cdc13p: a single-strand telomeric DNA-binding protein with a dual role in yeast telomere maintenance. Science. 1996 Oct 11;274(5285):249–252. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5285.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nurse P. Checkpoint pathways come of age. Cell. 1997 Dec 26;91(7):865–867. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80476-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Longhese M. P. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 1998 Jul 15;17(14):4199–4209. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Page A. W., Orr-Weaver T. L. Stopping and starting the meiotic cell cycle. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997 Feb;7(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(97)80105-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pati D., Keller C., Groudine M., Plon S. E. Reconstitution of a MEC1-independent checkpoint in yeast by expression of a novel human fork head cDNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;17(6):3037–3046. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paulovich A. G., Margulies R. U., Garvik B. M., Hartwell L. H. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):45–62. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Paulovich A. G., Toczyski D. P., Hartwell L. H. When checkpoints fail. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):315–321. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81870-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pringle J. R., Preston R. A., Adams A. E., Stearns T., Drubin D. G., Haarer B. K., Jones E. W. Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;31:357–435. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61620-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rotman G., Shiloh Y. Ataxia-telangiectasia: is ATM a sensor of oxidative damage and stress? Bioessays. 1997 Oct;19(10):911–917. doi: 10.1002/bies.950191011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sanchez Y., Desany B. A., Jones W. J., Liu Q., Wang B., Elledge S. J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science. 1996 Jan 19;271(5247):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sandell L. L., Zakian V. A. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):729–739. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90493-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schiestl R. H., Gietz R. D. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989 Dec;16(5-6):339–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00340712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sorger P. K., Murray A. W. S-phase feedback control in budding yeast independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of p34cdc28. Nature. 1992 Jan 23;355(6358):365–368. doi: 10.1038/355365a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stern D. F., Zheng P., Beidler D. R., Zerillo C. Spk1, a new kinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, phosphorylates proteins on serine, threonine, and tyrosine. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):987–1001. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sun Z., Fay D. S., Marini F., Foiani M., Stern D. F. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):395–406. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun Z., Hsiao J., Fay D. S., Stern D. F. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 1998 Jul 10;281(5374):272–274. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Thelen M. P., Onel K., Holloman W. K. The REC1 gene of Ustilago maydis involved in the cellular response to DNA damage encodes an exonuclease. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 7;269(1):747–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Toczyski D. P., Galgoczy D. J., Hartwell L. H. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell. 1997 Sep 19;90(6):1097–1106. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80375-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vialard J. E., Gilbert C. S., Green C. M., Lowndes N. F. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5679–5688. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):63–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. Characterization of RAD9 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and evidence that its function acts posttranslationally in cell cycle arrest after DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;10(12):6554–6564. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.12.6554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Weinert T. A., Kiser G. L., Hartwell L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):652–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weinert T. DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Apr;8(2):185–193. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80140-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Weinert T., Lydall D. Cell cycle checkpoints, genetic instability and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1993 Apr;4(2):129–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wolter R., Siede W., Brendel M. Regulation of SNM1, an inducible Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene required for repair of DNA cross-links. Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Feb 5;250(2):162–168. doi: 10.1007/BF02174175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Xu Y., Ashley T., Brainerd E. E., Bronson R. T., Meyn M. S., Baltimore D. Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 1;10(19):2411–2422. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.19.2411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yamamoto A., Guacci V., Koshland D. Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;133(1):85–97. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yamamoto A., Guacci V., Koshland D. Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;133(1):99–110. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang S. S., Yeh E., Salmon E. D., Bloom K. Identification of a mid-anaphase checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jan 27;136(2):345–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ye X. S., Fincher R. R., Tang A., Osmani S. A. The G2/M DNA damage checkpoint inhibits mitosis through Tyr15 phosphorylation of p34cdc2 in Aspergillus nidulans. EMBO J. 1997 Jan 2;16(1):182–192. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.1.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhao X., Muller E. G., Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell. 1998 Sep;2(3):329–340. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80277-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1119–1127. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhou Z., Gartner A., Cade R., Ammerer G., Errede B. Pheromone-induced signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the sequential function of three protein kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2069–2080. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES