Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Calcium. 2024 Dec 5;125:102983. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2024.102983

All-optical mapping of Ca2+ transport and homeostasis in dendrites

Rebecca Frank Hayward 1, Adam E Cohen 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC11735331  NIHMSID: NIHMS2041844  PMID: 39662137

Abstract

Calcium mediates many important signals in dendrites. However, the basic transport properties of calcium in dendrites have been difficult to measure: how far and how fast does a local influx of calcium propagate? We developed an all-optical system for simultaneous targeted Ca2+ import and Ca2+ concentration mapping. We co-expressed a blue light-activated calcium selective channelrhodopsin, CapChR2, with a far-red calcium sensor, FR-GECO1c, in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, and used patterned optogenetic stimulation to introduce calcium into cells with user-defined patterns of space and time. We determined a mean steady-state length constant for Ca2+ transport ϕ~5.8μm, a half-life for return to baseline t1/2~1.7s, and an effective diffusion coefficient D~20μm2/s, though there were substantial differences in Ca2+ dynamics between proximal and distal dendrites. At high Ca2+ concentration, distal dendrites showed nonlinear activation of Ca2+ efflux, which we pharmacologically ascribed to the NCX1 antiporter. Genetically encoded tools for all-optical mapping of Ca2+ transport and handling provide a powerful capability for studying this important messenger.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2041844-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Calcium is an important signaling molecule in all kingdoms of life.[1] In animals, Ca2+ is involved in many crucial functions, such as muscle contraction,[2] hormone secretion,[3] and neural activity and plasticity.[4] The cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration is determined by a complex interplay of transport across the plasma membrane, transport to and from internal stores in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria, and buffering by Ca2+ binding proteins.

Ca2+ signaling is often compartmentalized to sub-cellular locations to achieve region-specific effects.[5], [6], [7] This compartmentalization can occur over nanodomains associated with individual Ca2+ channels,[8] microdomains associated with clusters of Ca2+ channels,[9] or over larger regions defined by the geometry of the cell membrane, such as within presynaptic boutons,[10] dendritic spines,[11] primary cilia,[12] or individual dendrite branches.[13], [14]

To study sub-cellular Ca2+ transport and homeostasis, one would like to induce Ca2+ influx in user-selected patterns of space and time, and to map the resulting time-dependent Ca2+ concentration profiles. A genetically encoded system would also permit targeting specific cell types. All-optical genetically encoded tools for targeted perturbation and measurement are a powerful approach to mapping spatiotemporal responses of cellular signals. For example, we have developed all-optical systems for perturbing and measuring voltage,[15], [16], [17] cAMP,[18] and the embryonic morphogen Nodal.[19]

Here we co-expressed a blue-excited calcium-selective channelrhodopsin, CapChR2,[20] with a far-red fluorescent Ca2+ indicator protein, FR-GECO1c,[21] in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. We characterized the optical response properties and optical crosstalk between the actuator and reporter. We then used optical patterning to introduce local calcium fluxes and determined the resulting steady state length-constant for Ca2+ spread. We used wide-area channelrhodopsin activation to map cell-wide Ca2+ recovery kinetics. We combined these measurements to infer the effective diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ ions in the dendrites. Finally, we explored how blocking the sodium-calcium exchanger NCX1 affected Ca2+ transport and recovery after a perturbation.

Simple model: 1-D reaction diffusion

Reaction-diffusion dynamics provide a conceptual framework for interpreting the experiments below, so we introduce the relevant formulas and terms here. Similar ideas have been presented elsewhere, e.g. Ref. [18], [22]. We treat each dendrite as a 1-D tube (we ignore branching). The Ca2+ dynamics then follow:

Ct=D2Cx2-kC+Sx,t, [1]

where x is the contour coordinate along the tube, C is the deviation from equilibrium Ca2+ concentration, D is an effective diffusion coefficient, and k is a rate constant for return of Ca2+ to equilibrium. S(x,t) is the source density, i.e. the time-dependent injection or removal of Ca2+ into the dendrite, such as by CapChR2. Here D can (and does) differ substantially from the free-solution diffusion coefficient, because it includes the effects of interactions with buffers, uptake and release from internal stores, occlusion by organelles, and transient trapping of Ca2+ ions in dendritic spines. Here k captures the effects of all Ca2+ transport processes which tend to return the Ca2+ concentration to its equilibrium value. This includes transport across the plasma membrane, and also uptake by internal stores.

Eq. 1 is a linear partial differential equation, which can be solved by standard techniques. A sum of two solutions is also a solution. It is therefore convenient to introduce the impulse response, or Green’s function, G(x,t). To calculate the concentration profile for an arbitrary time-dependent input S(x,t), one simply convolves G(x,t) with S(x,t). Under steady-state conditions, i.e. S(x,t)=S(x), the steady state Green’s function, Gss(x), is particularly simple:

Gssx=1Dkexp-xϕ, [2]

where the length constant ϕ=D/k. This Green’s function gives the steady state calcium concentration profile around a constant Ca2+ flux localized around x=0, i.e. for S(x)=δ(x).

For a spatially homogeneous initial deviation in concentration C0, the time-dependent deviation in concentration is

C(t)=C0exp(-kt). [3]

Thus by measuring length constant ϕ and recovery rate constant k, one can determine the effective diffusion coefficient D=ϕ2k. For a more detailed discussion of Eq. 1 and its time-dependent solutions, see e.g. Ref. [18].

The above framework is a simplification of reality. It assumes that the underlying dynamics are linear, spatially homogeneous, and constant in time. There are reasons to doubt these assumptions. As Ca2+ concentration increases, intracellular buffers become saturated and the fraction of bound vs. free Ca2+ changes, leading to changes in D,[23] a situation handled by nonlinear models of buffered diffusion.[24] Ca2+ dynamics can also be nonlinear because of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release or uptake by the endoplasmic reticulum[25], [26] and mitochondria[27]. Finally, the inhomogeneous distribution of mitochondria can cause localized anomalies in Ca2+ concentrations,[14] the description of the dendrite as a featureless 1-D tube is clearly approximate, and Ca2+ buffering and transport are subject to plasticity at multiple timescales.[28], [29] Nonetheless, the model above is useful for predicting scaling properties of Ca2+ transport and for identifying deviations from the model assumptions.

Experiments

All-optical Ca2+ perturbation and measurement with genetically encoded tools

We created an all-optical system for mapping Ca2+ signaling by co-expressing a spectrally distinct optogenetic actuator and fluorescent reporter of Ca2+ (Figure 1A). To introduce controlled perturbations to Ca2+, we used CapChR2-eGFP[20], a Ca2+ selective cation channel with an activation peak at 475 nm. We first performed a detailed characterization of CapChR2 in HEK293T cells using whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology (Figure 1BF). CapChR2 was highly sensitive to blue light (intensity for 50% activation, I50=0.035mW/mm2, Figure 1C). The opening and closing time constants at 37 °C and 1.45 mW/mm2 were τon=31±8ms and τoff=112±21ms, (mean ± s.e.m. n = 6 cells). The kinetics were slower at lower intensity or lower temperature (Fig. 1D). CapChR2 had a positive reversal potential (10 mV, Figure 1E), consistent with preferential Ca2+ selectivity. CapChR2 showed negligible sag in photocurrent during sustained illumination (Figure 1F).

Figure 1: All-optical perturbation and measurement of Ca2+ dynamics.

Figure 1:

A. A blue light-activated Ca2+-selective Channelrhodopsin, CapChR2 is co-expressed with an orange-light excited Ca2+ sensor, FR-GECO1c.

B. Example recording of CapChR2 photocurrents in a HEK293T cell at 37 °C. Holding voltage −70 mV.

C. Normalized peak photocurrent as a function of 488 nm illumination intensity. Blue: average of n = 6 cells at 37 °C; purple: average of n = 6 cells at 22 °C, error bars show SEM.

D. CapChR2 opening and closing time constants as a function of 488 nm illumination intensity. Opening (circles) and closing (squares). Blue: average of n = 6 cells at 37 °C; purple: average of n = 6 cells at 22 °C, error bars show SEM.

E. Photocurrent for CapChR2 in HEK293T cell as a function of holding voltage. Reversal potential was Vrev=15mV. Experiment at 22 °C.

F. Representative cell showing effect of 594 nm illumination on CaPChR2 gating. Illumination at 594 nm, 0.21 mW/mm2 induced 8% photocurrent compared to illumination at 488 nm, 0.22 mW/mm2. Co-illumination with 594 and 488 nm reduced photocurrent by 30 pA, or 9.6% relative to 488 nm alone. Experiment at 22 °C.

G. Protocol for simultaneous optogenetic activation of CaPChR2 and measurement of Ca2+ dynamics via fluorescence of FR-GECO1c.

H. Example neuron showing expression of FR-GECO1c (red, left) and CapChR2-eGFP (green, right). Scale bars 20 μm. An astrocyte also expresses CapChR2-eGFP on the lower left.

I. Representative fluorescence responses of FR-GECO1c at the soma in neurons with and without expression of CapChR2. Experiment at 37 °C.

J. Maximum fluorescence responses of FR-GECO1c at soma in neurons with (n = 9 neurons, n = 5 dishes) and without (n = 7 neurons, n = 2 dishes) CapChR2 expression. Experiment at 37 °C.

To test whether the orange light used for imaging the red-shifted Ca2+ reporter affected the opsin, we compared CapChR2 photocurrents under blue (488 nm), orange (594 nm) and combined blue + orange illumination. At matched intensities of 0.22 mW/mm2, the photocurrent from orange light was only 8% of the photocurrent from blue light (Figure 1F). In some opsins, red or orange light can drive a transition from the open to the closed state.[30], [31] To test for this effect, we applied blue light (488 nm, 0.22 mW/mm2), and then after a 3.5 s delay, we applied orange light (594 nm, 0.21 mW/mm2) while maintaining the blue illumination (Figure 1F). The orange light induced a decrease in photocurrent of ~10%. Since the orange illumination was constant and homogeneous in our measurements, this slight decrease in overall CapChR2 photocurrent was not consequential.

To map the CapChR2-evoked Ca2+ concentration profile, we used FR-GECO1c,[21] a far-red Ca2+ reporter with an excitation peak at 596 nm. This reporter has previously been characterized in detail. The reported response properties relevant to our study are: calcium affinity 83 nM, maximum response amplitude (ΔF/F) 18, Hill coefficient 2, rise half-time 13 ms, decay half-time 156 ms.[21]

We then tested the combined system in cultured neurons. Cultured neurons were transduced with separate lentiviral vectors for FR-GECO1c and CapChR2-eGFP. We used a custom microscope (Methods, Figure 1G) in which 594 nm light and 488 nm light were combined, passed through an acousto-optical tunable filter, and patterned via a digital micromirror device (DMD, Figure 1G) which was re-imaged onto the sample. By rapidly alternating between orange and blue illumination and synchronously switching between two DMD patterns, we could create arbitrary and independent spatial patterns of orange and blue illumination. Provided that the alternation was faster than the biological response times of the sample, the flicker had negligible effect.

All Ca2+ transport experiments were performed in 2 μM TTX to block spiking, and 10 μM NBQX and 25 μM AP-V to block synaptic transmission, so that changes in intracellular Ca2+ were primarily mediated by CapChR2 currents. Two-color imaging under wide-field 488 nm and 594 nm illumination identified cells which co-expressed the actuator and reporter (Figure 1H). These cells showed a large increase of the FR-GECO1c signal in the soma during wide-area blue light stimulation, (ΔF/F=0.77±0.50, mean ± s.d., n = 9 neurons). In neurons expressing only FR-GECO1c the fluorescence change was much smaller (ΔF/F=0.026±0.014, mean ± s.d., n = 7 neurons, Figure 1I, J). These experiments established that optical stimulation of CapChR2 caused Ca2+ influx to the cytosol and a corresponding increase in FR-GECO1c fluorescence, while blue light stimulation evoked negligible optical crosstalk in FR-GECO1c alone.

To determine whether the optogenetically evoked Ca2+ transients were in the physiological range, we compared these events to spontaneous Ca2+ events in cultured neurons expressing FR-GECO1c, without TTX or synaptic blockers. Single spontaneous spikes evoked fluorescence transients that ranged from 0.73ΔF/F (mean 1.97ΔF/F,n=9 events, 6 dendrites, 2 cells), while bursts evoked fluorescence transients that ranged from 1.4-5.2ΔF/F (mean 3.7ΔF/F,n=15 events, 15 dendrites, 5 cells). CapChR2 stimulation evoked Ca2+ signals (in the presence of TTX and synaptic blockers) ranging from 0-4ΔF/F, in the same range as spontaneous events.

Targeted stimulation probes Ca2+ length constants

We then used targeted optogenetic stimulation of small segments of dendrites to probe Ca2+ transport (Figure 2A), again in the presence of 2 μM TTX. We used synchronous alternation of the illumination wavelength and the DMD patterns at 10 Hz to target the blue light to small dendritic patches and to provide wide-area orange illumination (Figure 2B). The camera was also triggered synchronously with the illumination patterns (Figure 2C). The 50 ms interval between blue stimulation epochs was shorter than the measured off-time of CapChR2, so this protocol gave a quasi-continuous photocurrent and near-simultaneous wide-field Ca2+ imaging at an effective rate of 10 Hz and 50% duty cycles for imaging and stimulation. The protocol also included some frames of orange-only illumination at the beginning, to provide a fluorescence baseline, and some frames of blue-only illumination at the end, to measure blue-excited FR-GECO1c fluorescence for post-measurement crosstalk correction.

Figure 2: Measuring the Ca2+ length constant in dendrites.

Figure 2:

A. Experimental scheme to test the spread of Ca2+ around a local optical stimulation of CapChR2.

B. Rapid (10 Hz) alternation of targeted blue stimulation and wide-field orange illumination gave an effective pattern consisting of both.

C. Experiment timing. Camera triggers were synchronized to acquire 1 frame per illumination cycle. 10 s of orange-only imaging at the start of the experiment provided a measure of baseline fluorescence. Blue light-evoked autofluorescence was measured at the end of the experiment.

D. Top left: example neuron showing GFP fluorescence under wide-field illumination (indicative of CapChR2, green), and GFP fluorescence under patterned optogenetic stimulation (indicative of stimulus pattern, magenta). Top right: steady-state ΔF/F of FR-GECO1c. Insets show stimulated regions. Bottom right: profile of stimulation (eGFP fluorescence, blue) and steady-state ΔF/F of FR-GECO1c (orange). Top scale bars 20 μm, bottom scale bars 2 μm.

E. Example response along a dendrite to localized stimulation. Left: Kymograph. Center: ΔF/F vs. time at different distances. Right: ΔF/F vs. position at different times.

F. Length constants for multiple stimulation spots for each cell, n = 12 cells, n = 7 dishes. Error bars show standard deviation of n = 3–5 measurements on same stimulation spot.

G. Steady-state ΔF/F vs. distance from stimulation for experiments with varying stimulus intensities. Solid lines: data; dotted lines: exponential fits. Inset: plots normalized to their maximum ΔF/F.

H. Left: length constant normalized by the average over multiple stimulation intensities at the same stimulation spot, colored by cell (n = 12 neurons, n = 7 dishes, n = 135 stimulation spots). Peak ΔF/F was used as a proxy for local stimulation strength. For each stimulation spot, a line was fitted to the normalized length constant vs. peak ΔF/F. Right: histogram of slopes for these fits.

I. Left: length constant at each stimulation spot vs. the contour distance from the soma, colored by cell. For each cell the data were fit to a line. Right: slopes of change in length constant vs. distance from soma. n = 12 cells, n = 7 dishes.

For each cell, we selected 3 – 6 well-separated dendritic regions to stimulate simultaneously. These regions were far enough apart that their calcium responses did not overlap. The FR-GECO1c fluorescence initially rose at the stimulus locations, and then spread, reaching a steady state after ~1 s (Figure 2D,E, Supplementary Movies 1, 2). The steady-state Ca2+ distribution extended substantially beyond the stimulated zone, showing the diffusion of Ca2+ ions from the stimulation spot (Figure 2D). We fit the shape of the calcium concentration profile with an exponential decay, with a length constant ϕ. We separately fit the regions on proximal and distal sides of the stimulation point. Proximal and distal length constants were similar (P=0.12, paired t-test), so proximal and distal data were pooled. In control experiments with neurons expressing only FR-GECO1c, targeted blue stimulation did not evoke a detectable change in FR-GECO1c fluorescence outside of the stimulated zone (Fig. S1).

We measured the length constants from 135 local stimulation spots over 12 neurons for multiple stimulation intensities (Figure 2F). There was statistically significant cell-to-cell variability in ϕ (P=1.6×10-18, one-way ANOVA). We speculate that this variability may be due to cell-to-cell differences in expression of Ca2+-transport proteins, leading to differences in efflux rate. Differential distribution of internal calcium storage or buffering machinery (e.g., ER and mitochondria) may also contribute to the variability in length constants. The population-average length constant was 5.8 ± 2.3 μm (mean ± s.d.), with cell-average length constants ranging from 3.7 ± 0.7 μm to 10.8 ± 2.7 μm. This result is broadly consistent with the simulation results of Biess and coworkers, who predicted a steady-state full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the Ca2+ signal of 5 μm, corresponding to an exponential decay length constant of 3.6 μm.[32]

We then varied the stimulation intensity from 0.07 to 0.86 mW/mm2 to test for concentration dependence of Ca2+ transport (Figure 2G). Steady-state Ca2+ concentration increased with stimulation intensity, as expected, but when the spatial profiles were normalized to their respective peaks, they appeared to have similar length constant (Figure 2G inset). Comparisons between stimulus locations were complicated by the large cell-to-cell variations in ϕ, and also by the fact that there were uncontrolled variations in optogenetic stimulation strength between regions. This spot-to-spot variability came from variations in CapChR2 expression level and from variations in the membrane area underlying each stimulation spot.

We thus focused on within-spot relations between Ca2+ level and length constant. For each stimulus spot, we calculated a ϕnorm=ϕ/ϕ, where ϕ is the average across stimulation intensities of ϕ for that spot. We then plotted ϕnorm vs. ΔF/F (Figure 2H). We did not observe a global trend. We then fit the slope of ϕnorm vs. ΔF/F for each stimulation spot, and plotted a histogram of the slopes. This histogram was centered at zero. Together, these results establish that we did not detect a relationship between the amplitude of the local Ca2+ transient and the steady-state length constant.

We also asked whether the length constant depended on contour distance, d, from the soma (Figure 2I). To account for the cell-to-cell variability in ϕ, we separately fit a line to ϕ vs. d for each cell. Length constants trended toward slightly shorter with increasing distance from the soma, with a median slope of −0.012 (dimensionless; quartiles = [−0.025, 0.0058]) but this result was not statistically significant (P=0.09). For example, at a slope of −0.01, the length constant would be 1 μm shorter at 100 μm from the soma than near the soma. This weak distance dependence is consistent with a membrane-based Ca2+ efflux mechanism: smaller-diameter dendrites have higher surface-to-volume ratio, leading to more rapid efflux and hence shorter length constants. Our measurements are qualitatively consistent with the results of Korkotian and Segal, who measured that under impulsive Ca2+ uncaging the half-decay lengths were 1.5 μm in “thick” and 1.2 μm in “thin” dendrites (definitions not specified).[33]

Wide-field stimulation probes Ca2+ dynamics

Under focal stimulation, as above, the Ca2+ dynamics at each point were affected by diffusion and by active transport across the cell membrane and possibly into internal stores. To isolate the effects of active transport, we next delivered wide-area homogeneous optogenetic stimuli that minimized Ca2+ concentration gradients along the dendrites, and thus eliminated the effect of lateral diffusion. We used wide-field CapChR2 stimulation and wide-field FR-GECO1c imaging to map the cell-wide Ca2+ responses to perturbations (Figure 3A). As before, we used TTX (2 μM) to suppress spiking. The stimulus waveform comprised three pulses of 6 s duration, with intensity increasing from 0.07 – 0.57 mW/mm2, and with 20 s rest between pulses. At the end of the experiment, we turned off the orange light and recorded autofluorescence excited by the blue light alone for each stimulation intensity. These crosstalk signals were then subtracted from the data acquired with the orange laser on.

Figure 3: Ca2+ dynamics under wide-area stimulation.

Figure 3:

A. Wide-area optogenetic stimulation induces global elevation in Ca2+.

B. Map of FR-GECO1c fluorescence. Left: at the end of the strongest stimulus pulse. Right: 1 s after the end of the stimulus. Scale bars 20 μm.

C. Top: kymograph of ΔF/F (top) along dendrite shown by arrows in B. Bottom: fluorescence at locations marked by arrows in B.

D. Example plot of ΔF/F showing the definitions of tmax, (ΔF/F)sag,t1/2, and (ΔF/F)undershoot.

E-H. Top: maps of the indicated kinetic parameters for a representative cell. Bottom: plotted as a function of contour distance from the soma along distinct dendrites in the representative cell.

I. Indicated kinetic parameters averaged over proximal and distal dendrites across n = 6 cells, 3 dishes.

J. Left: map of the half recovery time, and right: the steady state ΔF/F in an example stimulation spot. Right: Predicted relation between recovery time, length constant, and diffusion coefficient. Scale bars 2 μm.

K. Length constant, ϕ, vs. half-recovery time t1/2. Median diffusion coefficient is shown as black line. n = 8 cells, n = 102 spots.

The cytosolic Ca2+ grew during each blue stimulus and returned toward baseline after, but the dynamics showed striking variations with distance from the soma (Figure 3B, C, Supplementary Movie 3). To quantify these dynamics, we defined several parameters, shown in Fig. 3D. Figures 3EH show maps of the Ca2+ dynamics for a representative neuron, and quantification of these dynamics as a function of contour distance from the soma. Upon stimulus onset, the fluorescence in distal branches peaked in tmax<1s and then started to decrease, whereas the fluorescence in the soma and nearby dendrites continued to grow for the full 6 s stimulus. The amount of sag in the fluorescence after the peak, (ΔF/F)sag, was greater in magnitude in the distal branches (d>60μm from the soma) than in the proximal branches (d<20μm from the soma). Upon termination of the stimulus, the half-recovery time of the Ca2+ signal was faster in the distal dendrites (t1/2~0.3s) than near the soma (t1/2~0.6s). In the distal branches, the FR-GECO1c fluorescence then decreased below its initial basal value, before increasing back to baseline, while there was no fluorescence undershoot during recovery in and near the soma.

Figure 3I shows a summary of the proximal and distal recovery times across neurons and Fig. S2 shows the distributions of the other kinetic parameters across multiple cells. As with the length constants, there was substantial cell-to-cell variability in the Ca2+ recovery kinetics, although the proximal-to-distal trends in the dynamics were consistent.

We propose that the proximal-to-distal variation in Ca2+ dynamics can be explained, at least in part, by the greater surface-to-volume ratio in the more distal dendrites[34], [35]. For a given transmembrane Ca2+ current density (influx or efflux), the rate of change of concentration in the dendrite scales as 1/r, where r is the radius of the dendrite. This scaling accounts for the shorter time to peak, tmax, in the smaller diameter distal dendrites. This scaling also likely accounts for the faster recovery time, t1/2, in the more distal dendrites, where the efflux is through the Ca2+ ATP-ase (PMCA) and Na+-Ca2+ Exchanger 1 (NCX1)[36].

The sag during the stimulus epoch and the post-stimulus undershoot cannot be explained within the linear reaction-diffusion model of Eq. 1. Since the sag and the undershoot colocalized within cells and co-varied in magnitude between cells, we propose that these are likely through a similar mechanism, e.g. a Ca2+ efflux mechanism that is activated at high Ca2+ concentration and remains active for a time after the Ca2+ returns toward baseline. We return to this mechanism in the next section.

The measurements of length constants (Fig. 2) and recovery kinetics (Fig. 3) were performed on the same cells, so we combined these measurements to estimate an effective diffusion coefficient, D. For each location where we had applied targeted stimulation and measured a length constant, we also determined the Ca2+ recovery time constant t1/2 from the wide-field stimulation data. In a simple model of first-order efflux, the recovery rate constant is k=ln(2)/t1/2. While there was substantial cell-to-cell variation in ϕ (e.g. Fig. 2D,F) and in t1/2 (Fig. 3G,I), on a log-log plot of ϕ vs. t1/2, the data clustered along a line (Figure 3J,K). The inferred effective diffusion coefficient was D=19.0μm2/s (95% bootstrap confidence interval [16.9, 21.4], n = 8 neurons, 102 stimulation spots).

NCX1 mediates nonlinear recovery kinetics

The sodium-calcium exchanger NCX1 is expressed in hippocampal pyramidal cell dendrites in vivo[37] and in culture.[38] NCX1 is a low-affinity (0.2 – 10 μM),[39] high-capacity electrogenic Ca2+ transporter, whose primary role is to mediate rapid efflux of Ca2+ following an action potential.[40] The activity of this antiporter is dynamically regulated by Ca2+ binding to allosteric regulatory sites, as well as by many other intracellular signals.[41] We thus hypothesized that the nonlinear dynamics in distal dendrites (sag during stimulation and undershoot following stimulation) might be attributable to Ca2+-mediated allosteric enhancement of NCX1 activity.

We compared optogenetically evoked Ca2+ dynamics before and after blocking NCX1 with benzamil (30 μM; Fig. 4A)[42]. In both proximal and distal dendrites, benzamil increased the time to maximum fluorescence, (tmax:3.5±1.7s before, 4.1 ± 1.5 s after, P=6.8e-8, paired two-sided t-test, n=25 dendrites, 5 neurons), and increased the post-stimulation recovery time, (t1/2:1.8±1.4s before, 2.0 ± 1.4 s after, P=1.8e-9, paired two-sided t-test). In distal dendrites, benzamil also decreased the sag during stimulation, ((ΔF/F)sag:0.43±0.27 before, 0.26 ± 0.23 after, P=1.1e-9, paired two-sided t-test, n=25 dendrites, 5 neurons), and largely eliminated the undershoot before return to baseline ((ΔF/F)undershoot:0.058±0.028 before, 0.034 ± 0.029 after, P=0.0065, n = 12 dendrites, 3 neurons which displayed undershoot behavior before drug addition, paired two-sided t-test; Fig. 4B). NCX proteins have been reported to show complex gating kinetics, modulated by sodium, calcium, and ATP,[39] with inactivation time constants ranging from 1 ms to 10 s.[43], [44] Together, our results support the hypothesis that NCX1 acts as a nonlinear efflux pump, activated at high Ca2+ and slowly inactivating after return to baseline Ca2+, causing undershoot.

Figure 4: Effect of NCX block on calcium length constant and recovery kinetics.

Figure 4:

A. Left: ΔF/F of proximal and right: distal section of example dendrite before (dark line) and after (light line) addition of benzamil to block NCX1.

B. Effect of benzamil on tmax (top left), (ΔF/F)sag (top right), t1/2 (bottom left), and (ΔF/F)undershoot (bottom right) in distal and proximal regions of dendrites (n = 25 dendrites, 5 neurons, 3 dishes).

C. Comparison of length constants (n = 41 dendrites, 4 neurons, 2 dishes) before and after NCX1 block. Error bars show standard deviation over 3 measurements.

We used immunostaining to quantify the subcellular distribution of the NCX1 channel in cultured neurons (Fig. S3). When comparing to the non-specific membrane stain wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), we observed a slight enrichment of NCX1 in the proximal dendrites. However, we expect the influence of NCX1 transport on Ca2+ concentration to be proportional to the surface-to-volume ratio, which is higher in the thin distal dendrites vs. near the soma. We believe that this surface-to-volume effect most likely accounts for the larger effect of Benzamil on the distal dendrites.

We did not observe an effect of benzamil on the length constant in either proximal or distal dendrites (Fig. 4C). The measured increase in recovery time constant, t1/2, was ~27%, implying an increase in length constant of ~13%. This change was likely too small for us to detect.

Discussion

The combination of CapChR2 and FR-GECO1c provides a powerful system for all-optical mapping of Ca2+ transport and handling. We expect that this system will be useful across cell types and length- and time-scales. In neuronal dendrites, we measured length constants ϕ~5.8μm and recovery times t1/2~1.7s. From these, we calculated an effective Ca2+ diffusion coefficient, D~20μm2/s. Though there was substantial branch-to-branch and cell-to-cell variation in ϕ and t1/2, D was comparatively constant.

Free Ca2+ in water has a diffusion coefficient of D=778μm2/s.[45] Several prior studies reported measurements of Ca2+ diffusion in cellular contexts. In a classic experiment in Xenopus egg extract, Allbritton, Meyer and Streyer measured a diffusion coefficient of 13 μm2/s for a radioactive 45Ca2+ tracer at a basal concentration of 90 nM[23], which grew to 65 μm2/s at a basal concentration of 1 μM. However, in the Allbritton experiments, Ca2+ uptake and release from mitochondria and ER were pharmacologically blocked, so the roles of these stores on effective transport was not determined. A further critique of this result was that, by not mapping the concentration of the non-radioactive basal Ca2+ ions, the measurements ignored the contribution of these ions as they were displaced from buffers by 45Ca2+ tracers, i.e. that “messages diffuse faster than the messenger”.[46] Also, in the long-and-thin geometry of dendrites, membranous organelles might occlude Ca2+ transport,[32] and dendritic spines might trap Ca2+ ions,[47] effects missing from purified cytoplasm. Despite these caveats, our results are broadly consistent with the results of Allbritton and coworkers, interpolated to a basal Ca2+ concentration of 100 – 200 nM.

More recent measurements used fluorescent Ca2+ indicators to measure transport of all Ca2+ ions. Murthy and coworkers measured the spread of Ca2+ signals in response to quantal activation of dendritic spines in cultured hippocampal pyramidal cells, and determined an effective diffusion coefficient of 21 μm2/s (95% CI: 10 – 36 μm2/s),[22] remarkably close to our result. Biess and coworkers used photochemical uncaging of an inert dye to determine that geometrical effects alone (i.e. occlusion by organelles, trapping in spines, increased cytoplasmic viscosity) led to a ~20-fold decrease in D in hippocampal dendrites compared to free solution.[32] Thus, one would expect that geometrical occlusion alone would give DCa2+~778/20=39μm2/s in dendrites, and a smaller value once buffering was taken into account. Noguchi and coworkers used two-photon glutamate uncaging and calcium imaging in rat CA1 pyramidal cells in acute hippocampal slices to estimate a length constant of 1.6 – 1.9 μm and a calcium diffusion coefficient of 12 μm2/s.[48] Korkotian and Segal used photochemical uncaging of Ca2+ directly in hippocampal dendrites and determined that Ca2+ transients spread over 3 – 3.5 μm, but did not extract a diffusion coefficient.

Activation of synaptic inputs, e.g. via glutamate uncaging, can evoke physiological patterns of Ca2+ influx, but CapChR2 stimulation offers technical advantages for measuring dendritic Ca2+ transport. Synaptic stimulation leads to a time-varying Ca2+ influx, due to time-dependent glutamate concentration, AMPAR inactivation, and filtering through the spine head and neck. This complex (and not fully known) time-dependent influx is in series with the dendritic transport process we seek to measure, confounding the measurements. In contrast, with CapChR2 stimulation, one directly sets the spatial and temporal distribution of Ca2+ influx. An analogous situation arises in patch-clamp electrophysiology, where voltage-clamp protocols are highly non-physiological, but nonetheless allow scientists to isolate specific channel gating steps for detailed study.

Specifically, spatially localized and temporally sustained CapChR2 stimulation led to a nonequilibrium steady-state profile with an exponential decay away from the stimulation site, which we quantified accurately via long-exposure imaging, and then interpreted via Eq. 2. Wide-area pulse stimulation led to a spatially homogeneous Ca2+ elevation which decayed approximately exponentially in time, which we quantified and interpreted via Eq. 3. These specific stimulation patterns would not be feasible with synaptic stimulation. Thus, “non-physiological” CapChR2 stimulation led to better control of the relevant boundary conditions compared to more physiological synaptic stimulation. Control experiments measuring Ca2+ transients evoked by spontaneous spiking confirmed that the optogenetically evoked Ca2+ transients were within the physiological range.

Using an analogous experiment with a blue-light activated adenylyl cyclase and a red-shifted cAMP reporter, we previously measured a dendritic length constant of cAMP transport ϕcAMP~30μm, and a dendritic diffusion coefficient of DcAMP~120μm2/s.[18] Allbritton and coworkers measured diffusion of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) in free cytosol and determined DIP3~283μm2/s. They estimated a range of action of ϕIP3~24μm, though both numbers would be expected to be smaller in dendrites due to the presence of occlusions and traps. Using a blue-light activated channelrhodopsin and a red-shifted voltage indicator, we previously measured a dendritic length constant of voltage transport ϕV~255μm.[17] This hierarchy of signaling length-scales is an important aspect of modeling neural dynamics.

Ca2+ handling differs between neuronal sub-types,[47], [49], [50], [51], and is also fundamentally important in many non-neuronal cell types such as astrocytes[52], cardiomyocytes,[53] and immune cells.[54] Ca2+ signaling is also disrupted in many diseases of the nervous, cardiac, and immune systems. The tools we introduce here are expected to be compatible with a wide diversity of cell types. The tools could also find application in high-throughput screens such as are used in drug development, in detailed mechanistic studies in cultured cells, and in applications in tissue and in vivo.

Materials and Methods

HEK293T cell culture:

HEK293T cell lines were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% GlutaMax-I, penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL). For maintaining or expanding the cell culture, we used TC-treated culture dishes (Corning). For all imaging experiments, cells were plated on poly-(D)-lysine (PDL)-coated glass-bottomed dishes (Cellvis, Cat.# D35–14-1.5-N).

Neuron culture:

Primary E18 rat hippocampal neurons (fresh, never frozen, BrainBits #SDEHP) were dissociated following vendor protocols and plated in PDL-coated glass bottom dishes (Cellvis, Cat.# D35–14-1.5-N) at 21k/cm2.

Cloning:

CAG-FR-GECO1c was a gift from Robert Campbell (Addgene plasmid # 163682) and CapChR2_pmScarlet-N1 was a gift from Peter Hegemann (Addgene plasmid # 188032). Each gene was cloned into a lentiviral backbone with CMV promoter and can be found on Addgene.

Lentivirus preparation:

All lentivirus preparations were made in house. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with the second-generation packaging plasmid psPAX2 (Addgene #12260), envelope plasmid VSV-G (Addgene #12259) and transfer plasmids at a ratio of 9:4:14. For small batches of virus, we used 2.7 μg total plasmids and ~300k cells in 35-mm dish. Some viruses were concentrated 1:10 using Lenti-X Concentrator (Takara Cat. # 631232) following vendor protocols. Quantities of virus used are quoted using volumes prior to concentration.

Expression of optogenetic actuators and reporters:

For characterization of CapChR2 photocurrents, HEK293T cells were transduced at least 2 days before imaging with 50–200 μL of lentivirus encoding CapChR2-eGFP.

Neurons were transduced after 6–10 days in culture with 200 μL lentivirus encoding FR-GECO1c driven by the CMV promoter and 50–200 μL of CapChR2-eGFP, also driven by the CMV promoter. Functional imaging was performed after 12–20 days in culture.

Sample preparation for imaging:

Before optical stimulation and imaging, 35 mm dishes were washed with 1 mL PBS to remove residual culture medium, then filled with 2 mL extracellular (XC) buffer containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 15 HEPES, 25 glucose (pH 7.3). All imaging and electrophysiology were performed using this XC buffer. For all experiments in neurons, we added 10 μM NBQX and 25 μM AP-V to block synaptic transmission, and 2 μM TTX to block spiking. For drug-addition experiments the stage-top incubator was briefly opened after the first imaging run for addition of 30 μM Benzamil (Tocris 3380) before commencing the second imaging run.

Electrophysiology:

For patch clamp measurements, filamented glass micropipettes (WPI) were pulled to a resistance of 5–10 MΩ and filled with internal solution containing (in mM) 6 NaCl, 130 K-aspartate, 2 MgCl2, 5 CaCl2, 11 EGTA, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.2). The patch electrode was controlled with a low-noise patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments MultiClamp 700B). Current traces were collected in voltage clamp mode. The electrophysiology data were filtered with a moving average of 4 ms to reduce noise. The time constants were fit using single exponentials. In plots with multiple wavelengths of stimulation, the currents were normalized to the peak current for 488 nm stimulation.

Combined optogenetic stimulation and imaging:

Experiments were conducted on a home-built inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with 488 nm and 594 nm laser lines and a scientific complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera (Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash 4.0). Beams from both lasers were combined using dichroic mirrors and sent through an acousto-optic tunable filter (Gooch and Housego TF525–250-6–3-GH18A) for temporal modulation of intensity of each wavelength. The beams were then expanded and sent to a DMD (Vialux, V-7000 UV, 9515) for spatial modulation. The beams were focused onto the back-focal plane of a 60×/1.2-NA water-immersion objective (Olympus UIS2 UPlanSApo ×60/1.20W). Fluorescence emission was separated from laser excitation using a dichroic mirror (405/488/594). Imaging of FR-GECO1c fluorescence was performed with 594 nm laser at illumination intensity 0.21 mW/mm2. Stimulation of CapChR2 was performed with 488 nm laser at illumination intensities of 0.005 – 1.5 mW/mm2. Stimulation spots had lengths of 2–10 μm. Temperature was maintained using a covered stage-top incubator (Tokai Hit INUBG2ATFP-WSKM).

Immunocytochemistry:

Cultured neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature, and then washed with PBS. To stain membranes, Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) conjugated with AF488 (Thermofisher, W11261) was added at 5 μg/mL concentration for 10 minutes, and then washed with PBS. The neurons were permeabilized with PBST (0.2% Triton-X in PBS) for 30 minutes at room temperature on a shaker. The samples were then blocked with 4% Normal Goat Serum (NGS) in PBST for 1 hour on a shaker. For NCX1 immunostaining, the neurons were incubated with a rabbit anti-NCX1 primary antibody (1:200 dilution in PBST, Thermofisher, BS-1550R) for 24 hours at 4 °C on a shaker. Neurons were then washed in PBST for 10-min (x3), followed by 1-hour incubation with secondary antibody (1:1000 in PBST; AF647 anti-rabbit, Thermofisher, A32733TR) at room temperature. After three additional 10-minute washes in PBST at room temperature, the neurons were imaged on a confocal microscope.

Confocal imaging:

Confocal images of fixed neuron cultures were acquired using LSM 900 with 40× water immersion objective. AF488 and AF647 were excited with 488-nm and 633-nm lasers, respectively. Pixel size was 0.099 μm × 0.099 μm, pixel time was 0.44 μs.

Data Analysis:

All data were processed and analyzed in MATLAB. At the start of each measurement, prior to any optogenetic stimulation, the orange laser was turned on and the sample allowed to equilibrate for 5 s. Then baseline fluorescence, F0, was measured via the average fluorescence during 4.5 s of 594 nm-only illumination. To correct for blue light-induced autofluorescence in the FR-GECO1c channel, at the end of the experiment images were acquired with blue-only illumination (orange light off). These images were then subtracted from the corresponding frames acquired during simultaneous optogenetic stimulation and Ca2+ imaging.

Individual cells expressing the desired constructs were selected by hand and fluorescence waveforms were calculated by averaging pixels in the selected region and subtracting the background, which was computed by taking the 20th percentile of fluorescence intensity for pixels in a dark region of the field of view during imaging. We selected the 20th percentile to avoid sensitivity to puncta or light scatter from nearby bright objects. The analysis results were not sensitive to the precise percentile used.

To determine steady-state Ca2+ length constant, the mean fluorescence profile was measured starting at the edge of the stimulation spot, from 6 – 19 s after blue stimulus onset. The profile was fit using a single exponential + constant.

To characterize the Ca2+ responses to wide-area stimulation, tmax was calculated as the time from the start of stimulation until maximum ΔF/F. (ΔF/F)sag was calculated as the difference between ΔF/F at tmax vs. at end of stimulation. t1/2 was calculated as the time where ΔF/F was halfway between ΔF/F at the end of the stimulation and the baseline value after 20 s of relaxation. Linear interpolation was used to improve the time resolution in estimating t1/2. (ΔF/F)undershoot was calculated as the difference between the minimum of ΔF/F during the recovery phase and the ΔF/F baseline after smoothing with a gaussian-weighted average over 4 s windows. (ΔF/F)undershoot was only accepted as genuine if it was larger than the standard deviation in the ΔF/F baseline. Proximal and Distal measurements were calculated by averaging the ΔF/F from all regions 0 – 20 μm from soma and beyond 60 μm from soma, respectively.

For measurements of Ca2+ dynamics before and after addition of benzamil, some acquisitions had small movements between the two sets of measurements. The raw data were aligned using image registration functions in Matlab to ensure the same spatial regions are used pre- and post-drug.

Supplementary Material

1
Download video file (349.3KB, avi)
2
Download video file (336.6KB, avi)
3
Download video file (3.6MB, avi)
4

Highlights:

  • All-optical system for perturbation and mapping of cellular Ca2+.

  • Maps of Ca2+ diffusion, length constant, and equilibration time in neuronal dendrites.

  • Distal dendrites showed nonlinear activation of Ca2+ efflux via the NCX1 antiporter

Acknowledgments.

We thank Katherine Xiang, Andrew Preecha and Shahinoor Begum for helpful discussions and technical assistance. This work was supported by a Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship N00014-18-1-2859, NIH grants 1-R01-MH117042, and 1-R01-NS126043, and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative dynamic imaging grant 2023-321177.

Declaration of interests

Adam Cohen reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Adam Cohen reports financial support was provided by Office of Naval Research. Adam Cohen reports financial support was provided by The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Competing interests. The authors declare no competing interests.

Data Availability:

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • [1].Clapham DE, “Calcium Signaling,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1047–1058, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Berchtold MW, Brinkmeier H, and Müntener M, “Calcium Ion in Skeletal Muscle: Its Crucial Role for Muscle Function, Plasticity, and Disease,” Physiol. Rev, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 1215–1265, Jul. 2000, doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Rubin RP, Calcium and Cellular Secretion. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Brini M, Calì T, Ottolini D, and Carafoli E, “Neuronal calcium signaling: function and dysfunction,” Cell. Mol. Life Sci, vol. 71, no. 15, pp. 2787–2814, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1550-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Blaustein MP, “Calcium transport and buffering in neurons,” Trends Neurosci, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 438–443, Jan. 1988, doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90195-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Augustine GJ, Santamaria F, and Tanaka K, “Local Calcium Signaling in Neurons,” Neuron, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 331–346, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00639-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Heine M, Heck J, Ciuraszkiewicz A, and Bikbaev A, “Dynamic compartmentalization of calcium channel signalling in neurons,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 169, p. 107556, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Gandini MA and Zamponi GW, “Voltage-gated calcium channel nanodomains: molecular composition and function,” FEBS J, vol. 289, no. 3, pp. 614–633, 2022, doi: 10.1111/febs.15759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Berridge MJ, “Calcium microdomains: Organization and function,” Cell Calcium, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 405–412, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Emptage NJ, Reid CA, and Fine A, “Calcium Stores in Hippocampal Synaptic Boutons Mediate Short-Term Plasticity, Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry, and Spontaneous Transmitter Release,” Neuron, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 197–208, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00190-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Sabatini BL, Maravall M, and Svoboda K, “Ca2+ signaling in dendritic spines,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 349–356, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00218-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Delling M, DeCaen PG, Doerner JF, Febvay S, and Clapham DE, “Primary cilia are specialized calcium signalling organelles,” Nature, vol. 504, no. 7479, pp. 311–314, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1038/nature12833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Dittmer PJ, Dell’Acqua ML, and Sather WA, “Synaptic crosstalk conferred by a zone of differentially regulated Ca2+ signaling in the dendritic shaft adjoining a potentiated spine,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, vol. 116, no. 27, pp. 13611–13620, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902461116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Benedetti L et al. , “Periodic ER-plasma membrane junctions support long-range Ca2+ signal integration in dendrites,” May 31, 2024, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.27.596121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Hochbaum DR et al. , “All-optical electrophysiology in mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins,” Nat. Methods, vol. 11, no. Journal Article, pp. 825–833, 2014, doi: 10/f6cwwm. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Jia BZ, Qi Y, Wong-Campos JD, Megason SG, and Cohen AE, “A bioelectrical phase transition patterns the first vertebrate heartbeats,” Nature, vol. 622, no. 7981, Art. no. 7981, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06561-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Park P et al. , “Dendritic voltage imaging reveals biophysical basis of associative plasticity rules,” Jun. 02, 2023, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.02.543490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Xiang KM, Park P, Koren SA, Hayward RF, and Cohen AE, “All-optical mapping of cAMP transport reveals rules of sub-cellular localization,” Jun. 29, 2023, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.27.546633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].McNamara HM et al. , “Optogenetic control of Nodal signaling patterns,” Apr. 12, 2024, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.11.588875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Fernandez Lahore RG et al. , “Calcium-permeable channelrhodopsins for the photocontrol of calcium signalling,” Nat. Commun, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 7844, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35373-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Dalangin R et al. , “Far-red fluorescent genetically encoded calcium ion indicators,” Nov. 15, 2020, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.12.380089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Murthy VN, Sejnowski TJ, and Stevens CF, “Dynamics of dendritic calcium transients evoked by quantal release at excitatory hippocampal synapses,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 901–906, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Allbritton NL, Meyer T, and Stryer L, “Range of Messenger Action of Calcium Ion and Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate,” Science, vol. 258, no. 5089, pp. 1812–1815, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Wagner J and Keizer J, “Effects of rapid buffers on Ca2+ diffusion and Ca2+ oscillations,” Biophys. J, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 447–456, Jul. 1994, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80500-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sandler VM and Barbara J-G, “Calcium-Induced Calcium Release Contributes to Action Potential-Evoked Calcium Transients in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons,” J. Neurosci, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 4325–4336, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04325.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hausser M, Spruston N, and Stuart GJ, “Diversity and dynamics of dendritic signaling,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5492, pp. 739–744, 2000, doi: 10/bk75vh. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Nicholls DG, “Mitochondria and calcium signaling,” Cell Calcium, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 311–317, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Frick A and Johnston D, “Plasticity of dendritic excitability,” J. Neurobiol, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 100–115, 2005, doi: 10.1002/neu.20148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Simons SB, Escobedo Y, Yasuda R, and Dudek SM, “Regional differences in hippocampal calcium handling provide a cellular mechanism for limiting plasticity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, vol. 106, no. 33, pp. 14080–14084, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904775106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Berndt A, Yizhar O, Gunaydin LA, Hegemann P, and Deisseroth K, “Bi-stable neural state switches,” Nat. Neurosci, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 229–234, 2009, doi: 10/dkxs82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Venkatachalam V and Cohen AE, “Imaging GFP-based reporters in neurons with multiwavelength optogenetic control,” Biophys. J, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1554–1563, 2014, doi: 10/f6j432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Biess A, Korkotian E, and Holcman D, “Barriers to Diffusion in Dendrites and Estimation of Calcium Spread Following Synaptic Inputs,” PLOS Comput. Biol, vol. 7, no. 10, p. e1002182, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Korkotian E and Segal M, “Spatially confined diffusion of calcium in dendrites of hippocampal neurons revealed by flash photolysis of caged calcium,” Cell Calcium, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 441–449, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Holthoff K, Tsay D, and Yuste R, “Calcium Dynamics of Spines Depend on Their Dendritic Location,” Neuron, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 425–437, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00576-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Cornelisse LN, van Elburg RAJ, Meredith RM, Yuste R, and Mansvelder HD, “High Speed Two-Photon Imaging of Calcium Dynamics in Dendritic Spines: Consequences for Spine Calcium Kinetics and Buffer Capacity,” PLOS ONE, vol. 2, no. 10, p. e1073, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Thayer SA, Usachev YM, and Pottorf WJ, “Modulating Ca2+ clearance from neurons,” Front. Biosci, vol. 7, pp. d1255–79, May 2002, doi: 10.2741/a838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Minelli A, Castaldo P, Gobbi P, Salucci S, Magi S, and Amoroso S, “Cellular and subcellular localization of Na+–Ca2+ exchanger protein isoforms, NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3 in cerebral cortex and hippocampus of adult rat,” Cell Calcium, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 221–234, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Thurneysen T, Nicoll DA, Philipson KD, and Porzig H, “Sodium/calcium exchanger subtypes NCX1, NCX2 and NCX3 show cell-specific expression in rat hippocampus cultures,” Mol. Brain Res, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 145–156, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00461-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Giladi M and Khananshvili D, “Molecular Determinants of Allosteric Regulation in NCX Proteins,” in Sodium Calcium Exchange: A Growing Spectrum of Pathophysiological Implications: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Sodium Calcium Exchange, Annunziato L, Ed., Boston, MA: Springer US, 2013, pp. 35–48. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4756-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Khananshvili D, “Sodium-calcium exchangers (NCX): molecular hallmarks underlying the tissue-specific and systemic functions,” Pflüg. Arch. - Eur. J. Physiol, vol. 466, no. 1, pp. 43–60, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1405-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Annunziato L, Pignataro G, and Molinaro P, “Na+/Ca2+ Exchangers,” in Encyclopedia of Molecular Pharmacology, Offermanns S and Rosenthal W, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1037–1047. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57401-7_192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Frelin C, Barbry P, Vigne P, Chassande O, Cragoe EJ, and Lazdunski M, “Amiloride and its analogs as tools to inhibit Na+ transport via the Na+ channel, the Na+/H+ antiport and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger,” Biochimie, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1285–1290, Sep. 1988, doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(88)90196-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Hilgemann DW, Matsuoka S, Nagel GA, and Collins A, “Steady-state and dynamic properties of cardiac sodium-calcium exchange. Sodium-dependent inactivation.” J. Gen. Physiol, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 905–932, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.1085/jgp.100.6.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Hilgemann DW, Collins A, and Matsuoka S, “Steady-state and dynamic properties of cardiac sodium-calcium exchange. Secondary modulation by cytoplasmic calcium and ATP.,” J. Gen. Physiol, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 933–961, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.1085/jgp.100.6.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Wang JH, “Tracer-diffusion in Liquids. IV. Self-diffusion of Calcium lon and Chloride Ion in Aqueous Calcium Chloride Solutions1,” J. Am. Chem. Soc, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 1769–1770, Apr. 1953, doi: 10.1021/ja01103a539. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Pando B, Dawson SP, Mak D-OD, and Pearson JE, “Messages diffuse faster than messengers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, vol. 103, no. 14, pp. 5338–5342, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509576103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Santamaria F, Wils S, De Schutter E, and Augustine GJ, “Anomalous diffusion in Purkinje cell dendrites caused by spines,” Neuron, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 635–648, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Noguchi J, Matsuzaki M, Ellis-Davies GCR, and Kasai H, “Spine-Neck Geometry Determines NMDA Receptor-Dependent Ca2+ Signaling in Dendrites,” Neuron, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 609–622, May 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Goldberg JH, Tamas G, Aronov D, and Yuste R, “Calcium Microdomains in Aspiny Dendrites,” Neuron, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 807–821, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00714-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Goldberg JH, Yuste R, and Tamas G, “Ca2+ imaging of mouse neocortical interneurone dendrites: Contribution of Ca2+-permeable AMPA and NMDA receptors to subthreshold Ca2+dynamics,” J. Physiol, vol. 551, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2003, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2003.00067.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Soler-Llavina GJ and Sabatini BL, “Synapse-specific plasticity and compartmentalized signaling in cerebellar stellate cells,” Nat. Neurosci, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 798–806, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1038/nn1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Bazargani N and Attwell D, “Astrocyte calcium signaling: the third wave,” Nat. Neurosci, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 182–189, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1038/nn.4201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Gilbert G et al. , “Calcium Signaling in Cardiomyocyte Function,” Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol, vol. 12, no. 3, p. a035428, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a035428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Vig M and Kinet J-P, “Calcium signaling in immune cells,” Nat. Immunol, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21–27, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1038/ni.f.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
Download video file (349.3KB, avi)
2
Download video file (336.6KB, avi)
3
Download video file (3.6MB, avi)
4

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES