Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Inj Prev. 2025 Jul 21;31(4):333–339. doi: 10.1136/ip-2024-045259

Medical and work loss costs of violence, self-harm, unintentional and traumatic brain injuries per injured person in the USA

Cora Peterson 1, Likang Xu 1, Sha Zhu 1, Christopher Dunphy 1, Curtis Florence 1
PMCID: PMC11754523  NIHMSID: NIHMS2014960  PMID: 39043569

Abstract

Objective

Injuries and poisoning are leading causes of US morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to update medical and work loss cost estimates per injured person.

Methods

Injuries treated in emergency departments (ED) during 2019–2020 were analysed in terms of mechanism (eg, fall) and intent (eg, unintentional), as well as traumatic brain injury (TBI) (multiple mechanisms and intents). Fatal injury medical spending was based on the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample and National Inpatient Sample. Non-fatal injury medical spending and workplace absences (general, short-term disability and workers’ compensation) were analysed among injury patients with commercial insurance or Medicaid and matched controls during the year following an injury ED visit using MarketScan databases.

Results

Medical spending for injury deaths in hospital EDs and inpatient settings averaged US$4777 (n=57 296) and US$45 678 per fatality (n=89 175) (2020 USD). Estimates for fatal TBI were US$5052 (n=5363) and US$47 952 (n=37 184). People with ED treat and release visits for non-fatal injuries had on average US$5798 (n=895 918) in attributable medical spending and US$1686 (11 missed days) (n=116 836) in work loss costs during the following year, while people with non-fatal injuries who required hospitalisation after an ED injury visit had US$52 246 (n=32 976) in medical spending and US$7815 (51 days) (n=4473) in work loss costs. Estimates for non-fatal TBI were US$4529 (n=25 792), US$1503 (10 days) (n=1631), US$51 241 (n=3030) and US$6110 (40 days) (n=246).

Conclusions and relevance

Per person costs of injuries and violence are important to monitor the economic burden of injuries and assess the value of prevention strategies.

INTRODUCTION

Over 300 000 US injury deaths and 23 million emergency department (ED) visits for non-fatal injuries occur annually.1 Medical expenditures for injury and poisoning exceed US$133 billion and the estimated economic cost including lost healthy life years is US$4.2 trillion annually.2 3 Per-person medical spending and work loss cost estimates by injury mechanism (eg, fall) and intent (eg, unintentional) from 2014 to 2015 have been applied in multiple assessments of the economic impact of injuries and violence, including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) Cost of Injury website.1 46 Future assessments will benefit from updated cost data. This study aimed to update medical and work loss cost estimates per injured person.

METHODS

Previously described methods to estimate payer-perspective medical spending and work loss were applied to Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and MarketScan databases to analyse ED-treated injuries during 2019–2020.5 6 HCUP provides nationally representative estimates of community hospital visits. MarketScan is a convenience sample of millions of insured patients’ healthcare expenditures from approximately 350 health insurance payers and multiple state Medicaid payers. Costs were assessed by injury type—mechanism and intent, and traumatic brain injury (TBI; multiple mechanisms and intents)—using standard ICD-10-CM codes.7 8 Time horizon for fatal costs was the hospital visit and for non-fatal costs it was 1 year following the ED visit. Undiscounted costs are 2020 USD (not inflated from source data). An online supplemental file S1S8 reports sample counts and model variance. Authors used SAS V.9.4 and Stata V.18. This study did not require institutional review (Common Rule 45 CFR§46).

Fatal injuries

Fatal injury medical spending was assessed among patients with an injury primary diagnosis (hospitalisations) or any listed injury diagnosis plus injury external cause code (E-code) (ED visits) and hospital-based death in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) (figure 1).9 Mechanism and intent were classified by first-listed E-code and TBI was flagged using primary diagnosis (hospitalisations) or any listed diagnosis (ED visits). Medical spending was the facility charge multiplied by the hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratio (CCR; analysed records mean: 0.272 NIS and 0.171 NEDS) and diagnosis-specific professional fee ratio (PFR), plus ambulance and coroner/medical examiner (C/ME) costs. PFR was assigned by Clinical Classification Software Refined diagnoses and primary payer (analysed records mean: 1.191 NIS and 1.339 NEDS).10 The ambulance cost was US$123 (19% of ED visits have ambulance transport at an average cost of US$644).11 12 The C/ME cost was US$1157 (US$1.5 billion annual budget for C/ME offices referred 1.3 million deaths plus inflation to 2020 USD).13 14 Adjusted average medical spending per ED-treated fatality was the average of model-predicted values (Stata margins) from generalised linear models (svy glm family(gamma) link(log)) per injury type. Models controlled for patient sex, age, race/ethnicity (inpatient only), comorbidities (Elixhauser Comorbidity Software V.3.7), primary payer (eg, Medicare) and injury mechanism and intent.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Fatal injuries sample. aAll counts are survey weighted. bReported visit charges, patient sex (male, female), age, race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, other, unknown; reported only for inpatient visits), and primary payer for admission or visit (Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, self-pay, other (worker’s compensation, Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS), Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA), Title V and other government programmes), no charge, unknown). Data source: HCUP NIS and NEDS 2019–2020. HCUP, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; NEDS, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample; NIS, National Inpatient Sample.

Non-fatal injuries

Medical spending (inpatient, outpatient, outpatient drugs) for non-fatal injuries was assessed using MarketScan databases. Patients with commercial insurance (including Medicare supplemental) or Medicaid were analysed using the first ED visit during the study period (index visit) with a primary injury diagnosis (identified by the facility charge record) (figure 2). Mechanism and intent were classified by first-listed E-code and TBI was flagged using the primary injury diagnosis. Hospitalisations following the index visit were identified on the same or next day. Injury patients were matched to control enrollees (figure 2 notes) (online supplemental table S7). All subjects were enrolled 12 months before and after the index visit month. Authors excluded enrollees with capitated insurance plans, missing data and injury patients with ≤US$0 total payments for the 1-year observation period (figure 2 notes). Total payments for control enrollees were set to minimum US$0. Total payments for all enrollees were top-coded to the 99th percentile value (US$123 146).15 Adjusted average 1-year injury medical spending per person was the average marginal effect of an injury indicator (Stata margins, dydx) in two-part models (twopm firstpart (logit) secondpart(glm, family(gamma) link(log))) of injury and control patients’ 1-year total medical spending, assessed by ED visit disposition (treated and released (T&R) or hospitalised) and injury type. Models controlled for patient insurance type, age, sex, race/ethnicity (Medicaid only), region (commercial only), health plan type, comorbidities and injury mechanism and intent.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Non-fatal injuries sample. aAnalysis limited to injury patients and control enrollees with 12 months’ enrolment before and after injury patients’ index visit month. This was identifiable for injury patients using the data source Enrollment Detail file in combination with the index injury ED visit date (enrolment for the month was affirmative if the patient was enrolled on the first day of the month). Control enrollees were eligible for matching with an injury patient for any injury ED index visit month that the control enrollee had 24 months’ surrounding enrolment. bSubjects with missing data were excluded; this included patient sex (male, female), age, race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, other, unknown; Medicaid only), region of residence (included ‘unknown’ but not missing values; commercial only), health plan type, basis for Medicaid eligibility (Medicaid only). c1:5 patient match (SAS gmatch) using insurance type (commercial, Medicare supplemental or Medicaid), enrollee age (as reported in the data source for commercial enrollees; for Medicaid enrollees based on reported year of birth), sex (male/female), race/ethnicity (Medicaid only), region of residence (commercial only; based on metropolitan statistical area), health plan type (eg, health management organisation), comorbidity count (0,1, 2+ diagnosed in the 12 months prior to the index injury date based on Elixhauser Comorbidity Software V.3.7 in any clinical location), same months of enrolment (see previous note), and basis for Medicaid eligibility (eg, foster care; Medicaid only). dInjury patients analysed for workplace absences were enrollees from the medical spending analysis who were aged 16–64 years old with commercial insurance and who also had employer-reported workplace absence data for 12 months following the index visit month. A new sample of matched controls for the workplace absences analysis was identified based on the same factors applied for the medical spending analysis (eg, patient age, etc) among enrollees without ED visits for injuries during the study period who had health insurance enrolment for 12 months before and after the index visit month (same as medical spending analysis) as well as employer-reported workplace absence data for 12 months following injury patients’ index visit month. Data source: MarketScan 2019–2020. ED, emergency department; Hosp, hospitalised; STD, short-term disability; T&R, treated and released; WC, workers’ compensation.

Work loss due to non-fatal injuries was assessed among commercially insured injury patients from the medical spending analysis with workplace absences reported in MarketScan’s Health and Productivity Management (HPM) (figure 2) (online supplemental table S8). HPM reports millions of employees’ absent workdays using employer-submitted administrative data: general absences (sick or annual leave), short-term disability (STD; typically, up to 12 months), long-term disability (LTD; typically applicable after STD) and workers’ compensation (WC; for workplace-related illnesses and injuries). LTD was not assessed. Analysis of each absence type comprised separate enrollee samples (figure 2); total lost workdays is the sum of a statistically higher (p<0.05) number of absent days by absence type among injury patients versus controls. The adjusted average 1-year number of lost workdays due to injuries was the average marginal effect of an injury indicator (Stata margins, dydx) in negative binomial models (nbreg) of injury and control patients’ 1-year total number of absent days, assessed by ED visit disposition (T&R or hospitalised), absence type (general, STD, WC) and injury type. Models controlled for patient insurance type, age, sex, region, health plan type, comorbidities and injury mechanism and intent. Lost work days were assigned a daily market productivity value reflecting all-ages total employee compensation (wages and benefits) inflated to 2020 USD (US$153).14 16

RESULTS

Medical spending for injury deaths in hospital EDs and inpatient settings averaged US$4777 (n=57 296) and US$45 678 per person (n=89 175), respectively (figure 1, table 1). Estimates for fatal TBI were US$5052 (n=5363) and US$47 952 (n=37 184) (S1–S2). The range by fatal injury type in an ED was US$2863 (other specified, not elsewhere classified self-harm injury) to US$6867 (motor vehicle traffic-pedal cyclist unintentional) and in inpatient settings was US$26 639 (drug poisoning undetermined intent) to US$124 033 (fire/flame unintentional). People with ED T&R visits for non-fatal injuries averaged US$5798 (n=895 918) (figure 2) in attributable medical spending and US$1686 (11 missed days) (n=1 16 836) in work loss costs during the following year, while people with requiring hospitalisation averaged US$52 246 (n=32 976) in medical spending and US$7815 (51 days) (n=4473) in work loss costs (table 2) (S5–S6). Estimates for non-fatal TBI were US$4529 (n=25 792) and US$1503 (10 days) (n=1631), and US$51 241 (n=3030), and U$6110 (40 days) (n=246) (S3–S6). The range per non-fatal injury type was US$2475 (drowning/submersion undetermined intent) to US$8927 (non-drug poisoning self-harm) in medical spending and US$756 (5 days; other land transport) to US$1929 (13 days; poisoning) in work loss after injury ED T&R visits and US$21 061 (drowning/submersion undetermined intent) to US$75 405 (unintentional suffocation) for medical spending and US$5538 (36 days; motor vehicle traffic) to US$8293 (54 days; drug poisoning) for work loss following injury hospitalisations.

Table 1.

Medical spending per fatal injury

Intent (US$)
Mechanism Location Unintentional Self-harm Assault Undetermined Legal/war Unknown All
Cut/pierce ED 5382 5119 6110 5729
Inpatient 71 094 57 372 93 667 76 794
Drowning/submersion ED 3027 2945 2975
Inpatient 32 355 34 098
Fall ED 4878 4372 4871
Inpatient 36 305 38 137 36 312
Fire/burn ED 3396 3384
Inpatient 121 158 108 174 119 696
 Fire/flame ED 3392 3384
Inpatient 124 033 116 434 122 973
 Hot object/substance ED
Inpatient 108 057 105 207
Firearm ED 5341 5095 6014 5138 6356 5513
Inpatient 44 740 31 150 59 160 31 856 73 312 43 212
Machinery ED 4532 4532
Inpatient 66 409 66 409
Motor vehicle-traffic ED 5439 5440
Inpatient 65 224 65 214
 MVT-occupant ED 5157 5158
Inpatient 64 089 64 094
 MVT-motorcyclist ED 5453 5453
Inpatient 63 543 63 543
 MVT-pedal cyclist ED 6867 6867
Inpatient 61 218 61 218
 MVT-pedestrian ED 6104 6111
Inpatient 71 314 71 347
 MVT-other ED
Inpatient
 MVT-unspecified ED
Inpatient
Motor vehicle-non-traffic ED 4696 4696
Inpatient 62 950 62 950
Pedal cyclist, other ED 6673 6673
Inpatient 67 898 67 898
Pedestrian, other ED 4720 4720
Inpatient 53 669 53 669
Other land transport ED 4291 4282
Inpatient 57 433 56 556
Other transport ED 4838 4838
Inpatient 51 962 51 962
Natural/environmental ED 4072 4065
Inpatient 45 895 45 895
 Bites and stings, non-venomous ED
Inpatient
 Bites and stings, venomous ED
Inpatient
 Natural/environmental, other ED 4064 4064
Inpatient 47 833 47 833
Overexertion ED
Inpatient 47 207 47 207
Poisoning ED 3070 2968 2981 3042
Inpatient 38 010 28 711 27 476 36 120
 Drug ED 3030 2929 2938 3001
Inpatient 37 023 27 646 26 639 35 111
 Non-drug ED 3335 3260 3314
Inpatient 50 257 43 901 48 973
Struck by/against ED 3642 3782
Inpatient 39 529 68 164 48 292
Suffocation ED 3286 3049 3057 3174
Inpatient 46 647 44 429 46 822 46 028
Other specified, child/adult abuse ED
Inpatient 60 913 60 913
Other specified, foreign body ED 3196 3196
Inpatient 41 451 41 451
Other specified, classifiable ED 3254 3278
Inpatient 103 864 104 169
Other specified, NEC ED 2863 2983
Inpatient 92 329 80 378
Unspecified ED 4034 3832 4337 4033
Inpatient 44 351 40 245 66 174 47 172
External cause missing ED 4852 4852
Inpatient 58 000 58 000
TBI* ED 5069 5049 5506 4824 4861 5052
Inpatient 46 593 32 601 64 331 36 471 59 746 47 952
All mechanisms ED 4758 4205 5877 3647 5839 4852 4777
Inpatient 44 454 35 905 64 804 31 787 81 213 58 000 45 678

Costs are 2020 USD. Blank cells indicate average cost not calculated if <11 records or relative SE>30% or zero. See online supplemental tables S1 and S2 for associated number of analysed records, survey-weighted number of analysed records, mean and 95% CI costs, modelled SE and 95% CIs.

Data source: HCUP NEDS and NIS 2019–2020.

*

Multiple mechanisms.

ED, emergency department; MVT, motor vehicle-traffic; NEC, not elsewhere classifiable; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Table 2.

Injury-attributable medical spending and work loss costs per person in the year following ED-treated non-fatal injuries

Medical spending by injury intent (US$) Work loss by absence type (US$)
Mechanism Disposition from initial ED visit Unintentional Self-harm Assault Undetermined Legal/war Unknown All General absence Short term disability Workers’ compensation Total
Cut/pierce T&R 4641 5628 7408 5190 4689 487 811 260 1558
Hospitalised 37 091 40 757 49 037 39 782
Drowning/submersion T&R 3499 2475 2630
Hospitalised 21 061 21 061
Fall T&R 6916 3213 6909 524 1138 255 1917
Hospitalised 62 640 62 576 6894 6894
Fire/burn T&R 5140 6205 6442 5177 950 950
Hospitalised 37 717 42 632 38 566
Fire/flame T&R 5466 4764 5426
Hospitalised 47 925 48 121
Hot object/substance T&R 5081 6308 7318 5131
Hospitalised 32 128 40 611 34 103
Firearm T&R 4234 5350 6912 4488
Hospitalised 36 096 38 510 36 703
Machinery T&R 5469 5469
Hospitalised 36 561 36 561
Motor vehicle-traffic T&R 5610 5611 412 1150 283 1845
Hospitalised 41 370 41 401 5538 5538
MVT-occupant T&R 5748 5748 412 1187 280 1879
Hospitalised 42 418 42 414 5770 5770
MVT-motorcyclist T&R 4878 4878 898 898
Hospitalised 38 873 38 873
MVT-pedal cyclist T&R 3733 3733
Hospitalised 34 413 34 413
MVT-pedestrian T&R 6346 6339
Hospitalised 46 228 46 681
MVT-other T&R
Hospitalised
MVT-unspecified T&R
Hospitalised
Motor vehicle-nontraffic T&R 4231 4231 1167 1167
Hospitalised 32 819 32 819
Pedal cyclist, other T&R 3451 3451
Hospitalised 34 101 34 101
Pedestrian, other T&R 6158 6158
Hospitalised 32 513 32 513
Other land transport T&R 4328 4328 756 756
Hospitalised 36 003 36 003
Other transport T&R 3977 3977
Hospitalised 26 773 26 773
Natural/environmental T&R 5152 6149 5165 472 843 1315
Hospitalised 34 643 34 503
Bites and stings, nonvenomous T&R 4792 4792 443 852 1295
Hospitalised 35 836 35 836
Bites and stings, venomous T&R 5511 6168 5534 510 849 1360
Hospitalised 28 506 28 241
Natural/environmental, other T&R 6007 6007
Hospitalised 46 525 46 525
Overexertion T&R 5401 5401 432 1066 238 1737
Hospitalised 54 272 54 272
Poisoning T&R 7530 8124 6607 7935 7647 451 1479 1929
Hospitalised 68 500 43 198 53 026 52 462 7883 7883
Drug T&R 8202 8210 8268 8553 8218 1778 1778
Hospitalised 70 120 43 028 53 487 52 422 8293 8293
Nondrug T&R 5687 8927 5592 6046 5785
Hospitalised 55 818 47 822 49 707 53 077
Struck by/against T&R 3910 6519 5348 6581 4197 452 947 264 1664
Hospitalised 35 430 48 183 38 567
Suffocation T&R 8602 7568 6031 7949
Hospitalised 75 405 43 355 59 984
Other specified, child/adult abuse T&R 5122 5122
Hospitalised 45 851 45 851
Other specified, foreign body T&R 4287 4287 405 761 1166
Hospitalised 50 784 50 784
Other specified, classifiable T&R 4161 5784 4172 463 877 1340
Hospitalised 33 346 33 828
Other specified, NEC T&R 4336 7545 4705 5879
Hospitalised 43 157
Unspecified T&R 5680 8112 7538 5822 420 981 1401
Hospitalised 44 867 35 946 44 626 39 139
External cause missing T&R 5921 5921 402 1007 247 1656
Hospitalised 55 749 55 749 1561 6572 8133
TBIa T&R 4420 6151 4538 4529 463 1040 1503
Hospitalised 49 054 40 750 54 671 51 241 6110 6110
All mechanisms T&R 5589 7903 6051 5697 6016 5921 5798 431 1004 252 1686
Hospitalised 53 619 42 145 46 156 44 019 55 749 52 246 1569 6246 7815

Costs are 2020 USD. Blank cells indicate average cost not calculated if <20 injury patients for the medical spending analysis or <50 injury patients or controls with >0 absences for the work loss analysis, or if the 95% CI for the average marginal effect for the cost of injury included 0. See online supplemental tables S3 and S4 for additional information about the medical spending analysis (number of analysed injury patients and controls, mean medical spending with SE and 95% CIs), and modelled SE and 95% CIs. See online supplemental tables S5 and S6 for additional information about the sample for the work loss analysis (number of analysed injury patients and control enrollees and modelled 95% CIs).

Data source: MarketScan 2019–2021.

*

Multiple mechanisms.

ED, emergency department; MVT, motor vehicle-traffic; NEC, not elsewhere classifiable; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

DISCUSSION

Compared with 2014–2015 estimates, this study’s 2019–2020 estimates used new ICD-10-CM injury classifications, included the COVID-19 pandemic era (lower per person healthcare utilisation and spending17), used ED CCRs (newly available; replaced inpatient CCRs in previous estimates), and estimated average marginal effects from models of all subjects by injury outcome (fatal or non-fatal) and non-fatal injury ED visit disposition (T&R or hospitalised), rather than models limited to patients by injury type.5 6 This study’s medical spending estimate for ED injury fatalities (US$4777; 2020 USD) is lower than the previous (US$6,880; 2015 USD)—affected by new HCUP ED-specific CCR values, on average just 43% (0.171/0.396) of ED CCR values in the previous study—but the estimate for inpatient fatalities is higher (US$45 678 vs US$41 570). This study’s estimates for medical spending and work loss following a non-fatal ED T&R visit are modestly higher than previous estimates (US$5798 vs US$5600 and US$1686 vs US$1402), as is estimated medical spending for non-fatal injury hospitalisation (US$52 246 vs US$49 665), whereas estimated work loss for non-fatal hospitalised injuries is lower than previous (US$7815 vs US$8511).

Limitations

This study did not examine cost differences by injury type between this study and previous similar estimates and did not compare costs by geography nor demographics. This study’s modelling approach yielded more precise measures for covariates compared with previous but might have obscured the effect of unobserved factors common among patients with some injury types. Non-fatal injury costs were assessed during only the first year after an injury ED visit, which underestimates costs for injuries resulting in long-term physical disability or mental health consequences. Injury visits were classified by single mechanism and intent, which could misrepresent costs for multiple injuries. Commercial insurance enrollees assessed for workplace absences were more male, older and had more consumer-directed health plans than the total medical spending sample. This study did not address non-paid lost productivity such as time away from school, personal and voluntary tasks. This study did not address non-hospital injury fatality medical costs—an estimated US$38 781 (US$255 per day for 5 months) per patient for nursing home care and US$13 112 per hospice beneficiary.1820

CONCLUSION

Up to date per person average costs of injuries and violence are important to monitor the economic burden of injuries and assess the value of prevention strategies.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental tables only

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

⇒ Per person medical and work loss cost estimates for injuries and violence are needed to monitor the total economic burden and help to prioritise cost-effective public health prevention activities.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

⇒ This study provides updated average US medical care and work loss costs per injured person due to fatal and non-fatal injuries by mechanism and intent, as well as traumatic brain injury, to support public health decision-making.

Footnotes

Competing interests None declared.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS): CDC’s national center for injury prevention and control. n.d. Available: www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars
  • 2.US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Health care satellite account: blended account, 2000–2020 (injury and poisoning) suidland, MD2023. 2023. Available: https://www.bea.gov/data/special-topics/health-care
  • 3.Peterson C, Miller GF, Barnett SBL, et al. Economic cost of injury - united states, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1655–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peterson C, Rice KL, Williams DD, et al. WISQARS cost of injury for public health research and practice. Inj Prev 2023;29:150–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peterson C, Xu L, Barnett SBL. Average lost work productivity due to non-fatal injuries by type in the USA. Inj Prev 2021;27:111–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peterson C, Xu L, Florence C. Average medical cost of fatal and non-fatal injuries by type in the USA. Inj Prev 2021;27:24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hedegaard H, Johnson RL, Garnett MF, et al. The international classification of diseases, 10th revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) external cause-of-injury framework for categorizing mechanism and intent of injury. Natl Health Stat Report 2019;2019:1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hedegaard H, Johnson RL, Garnett MF, et al. The 2020 international classification of diseases, 10th revision, clinical modification injury diagnosis framework for categorizing injuries by body region and nature of injury. Natl Health Stat Report 2020;2020:1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thomas KE, Johnson RL. State injury indicators report: instructions for preparing 2021 data. Atlanta: GA:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peterson C, Xu L, Grosse SD, et al. Professional fees for U.S. hospital care, 2016–2020. Med Care 2023;61:644–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cairns C, Kang K. Table 4. Mode of arrival at emergency department, by patient age: United States Atlanta: GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2020-nhamcs-ed-web-tables-508.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 12.FAIR Health. Ground ambulance services in the united states. 2022. Available: https://www.fairhealth.org/publications/whitepapers
  • 13.Brooks C Medical examiner and coroner offices, 2018(NCJ 302051). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.US Bureau of Economic Analysis. National income and product accounts. 2021. Available: http://www.bea.gov/itable/
  • 15.Deb P, Norton EC. Modeling health care expenditures and use. Annu Rev Public Health 2018;39:489–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grosse SD, Krueger KV, Pike J. Estimated annual and lifetime labor productivity in the united states, 2016: implications for economic evaluations. J Med Econ 2019;22:501–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Health Care Cost Institute. 2021 Health care cost and utilization report. Washington, DC: Health Care Cost Institute, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Genworth Life Insurance Company. Genworth 2020 cost of care survey richmond,VA2021. n.d. Available: https://www.genworth.com/aging-and-you/finances/cost-of-care.html
  • 19.Kelly A, Conell-Price J, Covinsky K, et al. Length of stay for older adults residing in nursing homes at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:1701–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare post-acute care and hospice - by geography & provider 2020–21. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2015. Available: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/medicare-post-acute-care-and-hospice-by-geography-provider [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental tables only

RESOURCES