Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2025 Jan 14;21(1):e1012602. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012602

Naturally occurring variation in a cytochrome P450 modifies thiabendazole responses independently of beta-tubulin

J B Collins 1, Clayton M Dilks 2,3, Steffen R Hahnel 2,¤, Briana Rodriguez 2, Bennett W Fox 4, Elizabeth Redman 5, Jingfang Yu 4, Brittany Cooke 6,7, Kateryna Sihuta 6,7, Mostafa Zamanian 8, Peter J Roy 6,7,9, Frank C Schroeder 4, John S Gilleard 5, Erik C Andersen 1,*
Editor: Adler R Dillman10
PMCID: PMC11771912  PMID: 39808673

Abstract

Widespread anthelmintic resistance has complicated the management of parasitic nematodes. Resistance to the benzimidazole (BZ) drug class is nearly ubiquitous in many species and is associated with mutations in beta-tubulin genes. However, mutations in beta-tubulin alone do not fully explain all BZ resistance. We performed a genome-wide association study using a genetically diverse panel of Caenorhabditis elegans strains to identify loci that contribute to resistance to the BZ drug thiabendazole (TBZ). We identified a quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome V independent of all beta-tubulin genes and overlapping with two promising candidate genes, the cytochrome P450 gene cyp-35D1 and the nuclear hormone receptor nhr-176. Both genes were previously demonstrated to play a role in TBZ metabolism. NHR-176 binds TBZ and induces the expression of CYP-35D1, which metabolizes TBZ. We generated single gene deletions of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 and found that both genes play a role in TBZ response. A predicted high-impact lysine-to-glutamate substitution at position 267 (K267E) in CYP-35D1 was identified in a sensitive strain, and reciprocal allele replacement strains in different genetic backgrounds were used to show that the lysine allele conferred increased TBZ resistance. Using competitive fitness assays, we found that neither allele was deleterious, but the lysine allele was selected in the presence of TBZ. Additionally, we found that the lysine allele significantly increased the rate of TBZ metabolism compared to the glutamate allele. Moreover, yeast expression assays showed that the lysine version of CYP-35D1 had twice the enzymatic activity of the glutamate allele. To connect our results to parasitic nematodes, we analyzed four Haemonchus contortus cytochrome P450 orthologs but did not find variation at the 267 position in fenbendazole-resistant populations. Overall, we confirmed that variation in this cytochrome P450 gene is the first locus independent of beta-tubulin to play a role in BZ resistance.

Author summary

Benzimidazoles (BZs) are the most common drug class used to control parasitic nematodes, but because of overuse, resistance is widespread. The known genetic causes of BZ resistance are associated with mutations in beta-tubulin and are the most well understood of any anthelmintic class. However, BZ response varies significantly and differential levels of resistance likely require mutations in genes independent of beta-tubulin. We used the free-living model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to identify and characterize a novel cytochrome P450 gene, cyp-35D1, associated with natural resistance to the BZ drug thiabendazole (TBZ). We demonstrated that a lysine at position 267 confers TBZ resistance and was selected over multiple generations of TBZ treatment. This allele significantly increased the rate of TBZ metabolism in both C. elegans and yeast. In conclusion, we have characterized the role of variation in a cytochrome P450 that contributes to TBZ resistance, independent of mutations in beta-tubulin.

Introduction

Parasitic nematode infections pose a significant health risk to humans and livestock around the globe. An estimated 1.3 billion people are infected with at least one soil-transmitted helminth species, causing significant socio-economic burdens and heavily impacting quality of life [1]. In livestock production, infections are often subclinical but cause significant economic losses, reaching as high as 14% of the production value in some species [2]. Benzimidazoles (BZs) are among the most common anthelmintics used in human and veterinary medicine. Overreliance and misuse of BZs have led to widespread resistance in veterinary medicine [3,4]. Although not yet widespread in human helminth infections, studies indicate that resistance to anthelmintics is emerging and represents a significant concern [57]. Understanding the mechanisms of anthelmintic resistance represents one of the most critical steps in parasite control.

A cycle of discovery, in which candidate genes and mutations are identified using experiments in the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and then validated in parasites, or vice versa, has informed almost the entire body of work for anthelmintic resistance in nematodes [8]. Although improved genetic resources for the ruminant parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus have emerged in recent years [9,10], this parasite requires a host, which makes high-throughput genetic mappings and genome editing to confirm the phenotypic effects of putative resistance mutations impractical. The genetic diversity in parasite populations can be mimicked using natural populations of C. elegans. Using the cycle of discovery, the beta-tubulin genes ben-1 [11] and Hco-tbb-iso-1 were validated as the primary targets of BZs in C. elegans and H. contortus, respectively [1214]. Since initially identifying the target of BZs, nine resistance alleles have been discovered in parasites and validated in C. elegans: Q134H, F167Y, E198A, E198I, E198K, E198L, E198T, E198V, E198Stop, and F200Y [13,1519]. However, mutations in beta-tubulin alone do not explain all phenotypic variation in BZ response in parasite populations, and research into natural variation in C. elegans has identified multiple genomic regions containing genes that impact BZ responses independently of beta-tubulin genes [4,2022].

Here, we leveraged a large collection of C. elegans wild strains [23,24] and recombinant lines [25] to investigate natural variation in response to thiabendazole (TBZ), a BZ anthelmintic [26]. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) and linkage mapping (LM) experiment identified a genomic region on chromosome V that was significantly correlated with differential responses to TBZ. We further narrowed this region to two candidate genes: the cytochrome P450 cyp-35D1 and the nuclear hormone receptor nhr-176. Both of which have previously been shown to play a role in TBZ metabolism [27,28]. Interestingly, nuclear hormone receptors are often associated with neurons and sensory responses [29]. However, NHR-176 is associated with the nematode intestine where TBZ binds to the receptor and then induces the expression of cyp-35D1 [27,28]. The CYP-35D1 enzyme then initiates the hydroxylation-dependent metabolism of TBZ. We used CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to generate deletions of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176, which conferred significant susceptibility, confirming the role of both genes in the TBZ response. No nhr-176 variants were identified in the parental strains used for linkage mapping, but we identified a lysine-to-glutamate substitution at position 267 (K267E) in CYP-35D1, indicating that cyp-35D1 likely underlies differences in TBZ response. Using competitive fitness assays, we found that the lysine allele did not affect fitness in control conditions but was significantly favored in TBZ conditions, reaching near fixation after seven generations. Then, we measured the abundances of three key metabolites in the metabolism of TBZ: hydroxylated TBZ (TBZ-OH), TBZ-O-glucoside, and TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside and found significant differences in the accumulation of metabolites. Yeast expressing the CYP-35D1 lysine allele and exposed to TBZ were found to be almost twice as efficient at metabolizing TBZ compared to the enzyme with the glutamate allele, confirming that the lysine allele confers resistance by increased TBZ metabolism. Using deep amplicon sequencing analysis of similar variant sites in orthologous CYP genes of fenbendazole-resistant H. contortus populations, we found no amino acid variation, suggesting that the BZ response is not affected by variation at position 267 of H. contortus CYP-35D1 orthologs. We also investigated the potential evolutionary history of alleles at position 267 of CYP-35D1 in wild C. elegans populations to determine if the variation is correlated with the global distribution of wild strains. We found that the BZ-resistant lysine allele is represented by a single, globally distributed haplotype, which is likely a recent gain of greater resistance to TBZ. Overall, we characterized how natural variation in CYP-35D1 contributes to resistance, representing the first gene independent of beta-tubulin to be associated with BZ resistance.

Results

Two genes on chromosome V contribute to natural variation in C. elegans TBZ response independent of beta-tubulin genes

To quantify variation in TBZ response, we measured phenotypes of 214 wild C. elegans strains after exposure to 62.5 μM TBZ in a previously developed high-throughput assay based on nematode body length as a proxy for development [20,25,30,31]. Because TBZ inhibits development, shorter body lengths indicate slower development and therefore represent greater susceptibility to TBZ [16,20], similar to traditional parasitic nematode larval development assays. Highly TBZ-resistant strains had predicted loss-of-function variation in ben-1 (Fig 1A), as previously shown [20].

Fig 1. One large-effect QTL on chromosome V underlies differences in TBZ response.

Fig 1

(A) Distribution of normalized relative resistance in 62.5 μM TBZ is shown in order from most susceptible to most resistant for 214 wild C. elegans strains. Strains with variation in ben-1 have a red triangle at the base of the bar for that strain. (B) Genome-wide association mapping results for animal length that has been regressed for the effect of ben-1 are shown. The genomic position is shown on the x-axis, and statistical significance (-log10(p) values) is shown on the y-axis for each SNV. SNVs are colored pink if they pass the Eigen significance threshold (dashed horizontal line) or red if they pass the Bonferroni significance threshold (solid horizontal line). (C) Linkage mapping results for animal length are shown. The genomic position is shown on the x-axis, and the statistical significance (logarithm of the odds (LOD) score) is shown on the y-axis for 13,003 genomic markers. A red triangle indicates a significant QTL, and a blue rectangle indicates the 95% confidence interval around the QTL.

Variation in ben-1 is known to play a large role in BZ response, but our goal was to identify novel resistance mechanisms independent of the beta-tubulin genes (tbb-1, tbb-2, mec-7, tbb-4, ben-1, tbb-6). We performed genome-wide association (GWAS) mappings using the TBZ response data and two quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified, one on the left of chromosome II and another on the right of chromosome V (Figs 1B and S1A) [20]. Neither QTL overlapped with the six known beta-tubulin genes. Next, we regressed the effects of ben-1 variation on the TBZ response data to identify novel genes that could have been hidden because of the strong effects of ben-1 and found only the QTL on the right of chromosome V (S1B Fig). The lack of the chromosome II QTL in the ben-1-regressed mapping suggests that this QTL is associated with variation in ben-1, which has also been previously documented in mappings using albendazole [20], so we focused on the chromosome V QTL. Analysis of the peak marker on chromosome V showed that strains matching the reference genotype were significantly more resistant than strains with an alternative genotype (S2A Fig).

In addition to the GWAS, we performed linkage mapping with 219 recombinant inbred advanced intercross lines (RIAILs) generated by a cross of the laboratory strain N2 and the wild strain CB4856 [25] at 32.5 μM TBZ and found a single significant QTL on the right of chromosome V that overlaps with the QTL identified in the GWAS (Fig 1C). We looked at the difference between recombinant lines with the reference or alternative alleles at the peak marker and found that lines with the N2 reference allele were significantly more resistant than lines with the CB4856 alternate allele (S2B Fig). We then backcrossed RIAILs with the parental strains (i.e., N2 or CB4856) to create near-isogenic lines (NILs) that had the chromosome V region of one genetic background introgressed into the opposite genetic background to confirm that the interval on chromosome V was responsible for the difference in phenotype. The NIL strain ECA238 has the N2 genetic background at all loci except the QTL on chromosome V, and the NIL strain ECA239 has the CB4856 genetic background at all loci except the QTL on chromosome V (S3A and S3B Fig). When exposed to 32.5 μM TBZ, the ECA238 strain was significantly more susceptible than the N2 strain, whereas the ECA239 strain was significantly more resistant than the CB4856 strain (S3C Fig), validating that the QTL on chromosome V underlies differential responses to TBZ. Fine mapping of the QTL on chromosome V identified two genes highly correlated with resistance to TBZ, cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 (S4 Fig). Previous studies found that both cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 play a role in TBZ response, where TBZ binds to NHR-176 and induces expression of cyp-35D1, which encodes a cytochrome P450 that metabolizes TBZ [27,28]. Although the genes are adjacent in the genome, they are not part of an operon and were examined separately. Because both genes play a role in the metabolism of TBZ, we measured the effects of the deletion of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176, both individually and together, in both the N2 and CB4856 genetic backgrounds to further investigate the role of each gene in the TBZ response phenotype. Deletions of each gene were exposed to 32.5 μM TBZ. The deletion of cyp-35D1 conferred susceptibility in both genetic backgrounds (S5 Fig). Deletion of the nuclear hormone receptor conferred an equivalent level of susceptibility compared to the deletion of cyp-35D1 (S5 Fig). These results show that both genetic backgrounds have functional genes for cyp-35D1 and nhr-176. Furthermore, deletion of both genes together did not significantly alter responses compared to the deletion of nhr-176 alone (S6 Fig), in agreement with the known requirement for nhr-176 in the expression of cyp-35D1.

Natural variation in cyp-35D1 underlies differences in C. elegans responses to TBZ

Multiple variants with minor allele frequencies greater than 5% were found in both cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 in strains from the GWAS population. However, linkage mapping identified an overlapping QTL in strains where only a lysine-to-glutamate substitution at position 267 in CYP-35D1 was found. Because linkage mapping pinpointed a correlation only with cyp-35D1, we hypothesized that this cytochrome P450 underlies the observed differences in TBZ response. To test the effect of each allele at position 267 of CYP-35D1, allele-replacement strains between the N2 and CB4856 strains were generated using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Two strains in the N2 genetic background were made with glutamate at position 267, and two strains in the CB4856 background were made with lysine at position 267. Responses to 32.5 μM TBZ were tested in the allele-replacement and parental strains (Figs 2 and S7). The strain with the N2 genetic background and the glutamate allele (PHX2701) was significantly more susceptible to TBZ than the N2 parental strain with the lysine allele (Fig 2). The strain with the CB4856 genetic background and the lysine allele (PHX2883) was significantly more resistant to TBZ than the CB4856 parental strain with the glutamate allele, confirming that the lysine at position 267 was sufficient to confer greater levels of TBZ resistance.

Fig 2. A lysine at position 267 of CYP-35D1 confers increased resistance to TBZ.

Fig 2

(A) Strain names are displayed on the y-axis. The genomic background and the background where each cyp-35D1 allele originates are shown as orange or blue for N2 or CB4856, respectively. (B) Regressed median animal length values of response to 32.5 μM TBZ are shown on the x-axis. Each point represents a well that contains approximately 30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left vertical lines of the box represent the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom horizontal whiskers extend to the maximum point within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance is shown above each strain comparison; the N2 and CB4856 strain values are also significantly different (p < 0.01 = **, p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

In addition to the lysine-to-glutamate substitution identified in the CB4856 strain, a second lysine-to-aspartate substitution at position 267 (K267D) was observed in wild strains that were found to be more susceptible than strains with the glutamate allele (S8 Fig). We generated allele replacement strains between the N2 strain and the DL238 strain, which harbors the K267D allele, and compared TBZ response between the parental lines, as well as to the glutamate and aspartate replacement strains in the N2 background. Aspartate as position 267 did not alter the TBZ response in the N2 background. However, the DL238 strain was found to be highly susceptible compared to all of the other strains (S9 Fig), indicating that susceptibility in DL238 is not likely mediated solely by the allele at position 267 of CYP-35D1.

The lysine allele is not deleterious in the absence of TBZ

To determine if the resistant lysine allele causes any negative effects on organismal fitness in the absence of TBZ, we conducted competitive fitness assays in the N2 genetic background. Changes in allele frequency over seven generations (Fig 3A and 3C) were used to calculate the relative fitness of strains with a lysine or glutamate allele at position 267 in CYP-35D1. Relative fitness did not differ in control conditions, indicating that neither the lysine nor glutamate allele conferred any deleterious consequences in the absence of TBZ selective pressure (Fig 3B). However, the lysine allele was found to be significantly more fit than the glutamate allele in the presence of TBZ (Fig 3D). The benefits in the presence of TBZ and the lack of deleterious effects in the absence of TBZ indicate that, once present in a population, the lysine allele would be selected after TBZ exposure and likely maintained in the absence of selection pressure.

Fig 3. Competitive fitness assay across seven generations in DMSO and TBZ.

Fig 3

(A) The change in allele frequencies of the lysine (orange) and glutamate (gray) alleles in the N2 background was determined using competitions between a barcoded N2 strain in 1% DMSO. Generation is shown on the x-axis, and the relative allele frequency of each strain is shown on the y-axis. (B) The log2-transformed competitive fitness of each allele is plotted. The allele tested is shown on the x-axis, and the competitive fitness is shown on the y-axis. Each point represents a biological replicate of that competition experiment. (C) The change in allele frequencies of the lysine (orange) and glutamate (gray) alleles in the N2 background was determined using a competition with a barcoded N2 strain in 25 μM TBZ. (D) The log2-transformed competitive fitness value of each allele is plotted. Each point represents one biological replicate of the competition assay. Data are shown as box plots, with the median as a solid horizontal line and the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom vertical whiskers extend to the maximum point within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Significant differences between the wild-type strain and all other alleles are shown as asterisks above the data from each strain (p > 0.05 = ns, p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

A natural variant in CYP-35D1 affects the metabolism of TBZ

Metabolism of TBZ is initiated by cytochrome P450-dependent oxidation of the benzimidazole ring producing TBZ-hydroxide (TBZ-OH), which can be glycosylated to TBZ-O-glucose (TBZ-O-Glu) and phosphorylated to TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside (TBZ-O-PGlu) to aid in elimination by efflux enzymes [27]. To investigate the metabolic effects of CYP-35D1 variation on the metabolism of TBZ, we measured the abundances of TBZ metabolites inside the animals (endo-metabolome) (Figs 4 and S10) and in the conditioned medium (exo-metabolome) (S11 Fig) at two and six hours of TBZ exposure using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS). At both two and six hours of exposure, the abundance of TBZ in the endo-metabolome of the E267K allele in the CB4856 background was reduced relative to the parental strain, suggesting increased metabolism to downstream metabolites in the E267K edited strain (Figs 4 and S10A). On the other hand, K267E in the N2 background did not impact the amount of TBZ retained in the endo-metabolome as compared to its parental strain. No significant differences in metabolite abundance were found at either time point in the exo-metabolome among the strains, suggesting the involvement of additional detoxification and excretion mechanisms not affected by this single missense mutation.

Fig 4. The abundances of TBZ and TBZ metabolites in the endo-metabolome six hours after exposure.

Fig 4

(A) Simplified TBZ metabolic pathway. (B) The change in the normalized abundances of TBZ and three metabolites: TBZ-OH, TBZ-O-glucoside, and TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside) are shown, with samples taken at six hours after exposure to 50 μM TBZ. CYP-35D1 alleles are shown on the x-axis with K267 (orange) and K267E (light gray) in the N2 genetic background, and E267 (blue) and E267K (dark gray) in the CB4856 genetic background. Normalized metabolite abundance is shown on the y-axis. Abundances are shown as the log of abundance after normalization to the abundance of ascr#2. Each point represents an individual replicate. Data are shown as box plots, with the median as a solid horizontal line and the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom vertical whiskers extend to the maximum point within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance between strains with the same genetic background at the same time point is shown (p > 0.05 = ns, p < 0.05 = *, p < 0.0001 = ****, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with Bonferroni correction).

To determine if the observed metabolic effects could be recapitulated in another model system, we generated strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), a system previously used to measure metabolism of cyprocides [32], that express C. elegans lysine or glutamate versions of CYP-35D1. These yeast strains were exposed to 100 μM TBZ for six hours before analysis of TBZ-OH abundance using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight (LC-QTOF). We found that the lysine version of CYP-35D1 was approximately 1.8 times more efficient at metabolizing TBZ to TBZ-OH than the glutamate version (Fig 5). We found that when the lysine and glutamate alleles are compared within the same genetic background, the lysine allele significantly increased the metabolism and excretion of TBZ and TBZ metabolites.

Fig 5. Activity of wild-type and mutant CYP-35D1 expressed in yeast.

Fig 5

The metabolic activity of the lysine and glutamate versions of CYP-35D1 when expressed in yeast and exposed to 100 μM TBZ for six hours is shown. The activity of each enzyme is shown relative to the wild-type activity. Each point represents an individual replicate. Data are shown as box plots, with the median as a solid horizontal line and the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom vertical whiskers extend to the maximum point within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Significant differences between the lysine and glutamate allele are shown as asterisks (p > 0.05 = ns, p < 0.05 = *, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with Bonferroni correction). Differences observed between replicates of the same transgenic yeast line exceed any observed differences between different lines.

Evolutionary history and global distribution of CYP-35D1 alleles

We next investigated the evolutionary history and global distribution of the three alleles at position 267 (K267, K267E, and K267D) in CYP-35D1 to determine if the variants are regionally distributed, suggesting an isolated selection event, or globally distributed, suggesting multiple selection events for TBZ resistance. Using data available from the Caenorhabditis Natural Diversity Resource [23], we found that all three alleles are broadly distributed and sampled from the same geographical areas as well as across multiple continents (Fig 6A) [23]. We investigated the haplotypes at the cyp-35D1 locus and generated a tree for a region containing 25 kb to either side of cyp-35D1 (Fig 6B). The tree could be divided into three distinct clades, with the lysine allele in two of the clades. Tajima’s D was calculated for the same region used to generate the tree, and found no signature of selection at the locus (S12 Fig).

Fig 6. Variation in CYP-35D1 is not regionally distributed.

Fig 6

A map with the locations where each wild strain was recovered is shown. Each point represents a strain isolation location and is colored by the allele at the 267 position of CYP-35D1. (B) A neighbor-joining tree for the cyp-35D1 locus is shown. Each circle represents one wild strain and is colored by the allele at the 267 amino-acid position. Some areas where many strains were collected could not show all points because they are covered by other points. Map generated using ggplot2 under a MIT license (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/LICENSE.html).

Additionally, we investigated cyp-35D1 orthologs in other Caenorhabditis species (Fig 7A). For two members of the elegans super-group, C. briggsae and C. brenneri, the genes Cbr-cyp-35D1 and CAEBREN_29747, respectively, are the most phylogenetically similar orthologs of C. elegans cyp-35D1. For C. tropicalis, another member of the elegans group, the closest ortholog Csp11.Scaffold629.g12881 is more closely related to orthologs from the japonica group species C. becei and C. panamensis. Position 267 of CYP-35D1 and related orthologs do not have the TBZ-resistant lysine allele in any orthologous gene across the Caenorhabditis genus (Fig 7B). Glutamate and aspartate are the most common alleles identified in the Caenorhabditis species, except for serine in C. bovis and asparagine in C. becei. The four most closely related H. contortus orthologs also did not have a lysine at position 267 but did have aspartate or glutamate (Fig 7B) [33].

Fig 7. Lysine at position 267 of CYP-35D1 orthologs is unique to C. elegans.

Fig 7

Neighbor-joining tree for seven species across the Caenorhabditis clade, four orthologs from H. contortus, and the free-living nematode Diploscapter coronatus as an outgroup. The tree scale is denoted on the left side of the tree and represents differences in the sequences of the CYP-35D1 ortholog found in each species. (B) Amino-acid alignment of the region surrounding position 267 in CYP-35D1 for the species shown in the neighbor-joining tree.

To determine if resistant populations of H. contortus contained natural variation in cyp-35D1 orthologs, we performed deep-amplicon sequencing of the four most closely related orthologs from 128 archived samples of fenbendazole-resistant H. contortus and focused on the 267 position. Similar to what was observed in Caenorhabditis species, an acidic residue was present in 100% of the populations from three of the orthologs, and asparagine was found to be ubiquitous in the fourth ortholog (Table 1). The lack of variation at position 267 in FBZ-resistant H. contortus indicates a lack of selection within these populations and might represent differences in the metabolism of FBZ compared to TBZ.

Table 1. No variation exists at position 267 in the four H. contortus orthologs of CYP-35D1.

Deep amplicon sequencing of 128 populations of fenbendazole-resistant H. contortus was performed to search for variation at position 267 of the four most closely related orthologs of C. elegans CYP-35D1. The number of samples that were successfully sequenced and analyzed varied between orthologs, with the number for each ortholog shown in parenthesis.

Allele at Position 267 (% of Samples (n))
Glutamate Asparagine Aspartate
Hc_00022640 100% (110) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Hc_00022670 100% (110) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Hc_00073880 0% (0) 100% (118) 0% (0)
Hc_00073890 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (103)

Discussion

Over the last 30 years, beta-tubulin mutations have been associated with BZ resistance in both free-living and parasitic nematode species [1113,16,17,20]. However, mutations in beta-tubulin genes alone do not explain all of the observed degrees of BZ resistance and additional loci have been identified in C. elegans [20,21]. Understanding other mechanisms of resistance can provide potential targets for novel treatments, improve efficacy by reducing the level of selection, slow the development of resistance, and lead to the development of more comprehensive diagnostics for BZ resistance. Many gene families associated with xenobiotic response have been suggested as potential mediators of BZ resistance, including UDP-glycosyltransferases, P-glycoproteins, and cytochrome P450s [34,35]. Here, we have leveraged the natural diversity and robust genomic toolkit of C. elegans to identify and characterize natural variation in a cytochrome P450, CYP-35D1, that modifies C. elegans responses to TBZ independently of beta-tubulin.

Selection for resistance alleles in populations comes from exposure to xenobiotic compounds. Certain prokaryotes have been found to produce natural BZ derivatives as part of a vitamin B12 synthesis pathway [36], and contamination with commercial BZs used in agriculture has been found to be common and associated with lengthy half-lives of compounds like TBZ in the environment, providing a source of BZ selection for nematode populations [37,38]. Interestingly, the evolution of the more active CYP-35D1 enzyme appears to predate commercial use of BZs, because the lysine allele was identified in the N2 strain, which was first isolated in 1951, 18 years prior to the release of TBZ. Natural BZs in the environment have likely led to selection for the resistant allele in CYP-35D1, corresponding with the significantly higher relative fitness of the lysine allele compared to the glutamate allele in treatment conditions. Similar to previous studies of the effects of ben-1 mutations on competitive fitness [16], we found that the fitness of strains with the resistance allele are not significantly selected against in control conditions, suggesting that once the allele emerges in a population, it will be maintained in the absence of selection. We do not know if cyp-35D1 resistance is dominant, and future experiments can address this point. Resistance phenotypes conferred by ben-1 were previously shown to be recessive [17].

In addition to measuring how the lysine allele affects competitive fitness, we also wanted to determine how a single amino acid change alters TBZ metabolism. As previously noted, genes associated with xenobiotic response have long been considered as mediators of anthelmintic resistance, where animals that are more efficient at the breakdown and elimination of the drug have a competitive advantage. Metabolic analysis of the lysine and glutamate versions of CYP-35D1 in both C. elegans and yeast found that the efficiency of TBZ metabolism is significantly increased by the lysine allele. More rapid metabolism agrees with the observed resistance conferred by the lysine allele, because faster metabolism would cause reduced exposure to the more active form of the drug, decreasing treatment efficacy. The confirmation of natural variation in a metabolic gene that alters drug response highlights the importance of studying gene families that play a role in xenobiotic response [39]. Insights gained from studying xenobiotic response can lead to the development of treatments that target and alter metabolic pathways, providing a novel means of improving treatment efficacy and slowing the spread of resistance.

Lastly, we examined the evolutionary history of the lysine allele in Caenorhabditis species, as well as if the allele is found in parasite populations. The broader geographical distribution of the glutamate allele, along with its high frequency across nematode orthologs of CYP-35D1, suggests that glutamate represents the ancestral allele, and the lysine allele is likely a more recent adaptation. The significant number of strains carrying lysine at position 267 indicates that this allele is selected and, once selected, will likely persist in populations. Beyond C. elegans alone, amino acid sequences from the reference sequence of each non-elegans species and that of three C. elegans strains (N2, CB4856, DL238) used in the current study were analyzed for the allele at position 267. Only C. elegans contained the basic lysine allele at position 267, whereas the other species had acidic or neutral residues, likely representing the ancestral state. However, it is important to note that other nematode species like Strongyloides stercoralis and Bursaphelenchus okinawaensis also have lysine at position 267 in predicted cyp-35D1 orthologs. Additional variants at this position are also found in predicted cyp-35D1 orthologs in other species, but the high levels of conservation of cytochrome P450s make functional determination of differences difficult. Therefore, we focused on C. elegans variants where we could mechanistically test the effects of each allele and search in the available FBZ-resistant H. contortus populations. Future efforts can explore the role of the cytochrome P450 family in BZ responses.

The presence of lysine only in C. elegans indicates an evolutionarily more recent acquisition of this resistance allele, but it is important to note that we only examined a small region surrounding position 267 of CYP-35D1. Data available in the Caenorhabditis Natural Diversity Resource show multiple CYP-35D1 variants that alter amino acid residues in both C. briggsae and C. tropicalis [23]. Although we can draw no conclusions about the resistance status, alleles at other positions can alter responses in a similar manner to the lysine allele at position 267. Therefore, the lack of variation at position 267 does not preclude the possibility that additional variants that alter BZ responses are present in other species. Also, although we did not identify variation in the nuclear hormone receptor NHR-176 in the CB4856 strain, further exploration of the second gene in the QTL would be interesting. Variants in nhr-176 found in other strains are present and could alter the TBZ response. Additionally, differences in expression of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 are not found between CB4856 and N2. However, expression differences in other strains could also play a role in altering the TBZ response.

When orthologs of CYP-35D1 were examined in the parasite H. contortus, no basic residues were identified within the four orthologs, similar to the non-elegans Caenorhabditis species. However, the reference genome represents a single population, and variation between populations must be examined to make broader conclusions. Analysis of position 267 in 128 H. contortus populations that were exposed to long-term FBZ selection in the field was performed to determine if any variation in that residue exists. No variation in position 267 was identified in any of the four orthologs. However, it is important to note that TBZ has not been used in the field for many decades, caused in part by the creation of more effective BZ compounds. The tested H. contortus populations have been exposed to heavy selection with FBZ. Furthermore, previous GWAS mappings using FBZ and ABZ did not identify the cyp-35D1 QTL, although other novel QTL were identified in these mappings (Zamanian et al. 2018; Hahnel et al. 2018) [21,20]. Structural differences could alter how each drug is metabolized. For example, TBZ contains a thiazole ring that increases the susceptibility of TBZ to oxidative metabolism. Metabolism of TBZ and FBZ could use different pathways, so variation associated with TBZ resistance might not be present in FBZ-resistant samples. In addition, as noted among Caenorhabditis species, we only examined a single amino acid site in four H. contortus cytochrome P450s, and alteration of TBZ responses could be caused by variation at other sites or in other cytochrome P450s. To fully determine if similar variation can occur in parasite populations, identification of populations that have undergone TBZ selection pressure is needed to determine if variation is present at CYP-35D1 orthologs of parasites.

Conclusions

Despite the lack of variation found in H. contortus orthologs, the role of variation in CYP-35D1 in TBZ response reinforces the need to study how variation in drug metabolism genes modifies anthelmintic responses. Although the effects of variation in CYP-35D1 are relatively small compared to the impact of variation in the beta-tubulin target of BZs, changes to drug metabolism could have significant impacts on the evolution of resistance in a susceptible population. Inadequate dosing is all too common, and the increased metabolism conferred by variation in a metabolic pathway could enable parasite survival until a larger effect mutation is acquired, such as mutations in beta-tubulin. Conversely, in populations where a mutation in beta-tubulin has reached fixation, a change in a metabolic pathway could further increase resistance levels. In either situation, variation in a gene involved in a BZ metabolic pathway could have a significant impact on the development and severity of resistance. By studying and leveraging knowledge of drug metabolism, treatments can be designed that inhibit metabolism and increase treatment efficacy, promoting the sustainability of current treatments and slowing the development of resistance.

Methods

C. elegans strains

Nematodes were grown on plates of modified nematode growth media (NGMA) containing 1% agar and 0.7% agarose and seeded with OP50 bacteria [40]. Plates were maintained at 20°C for the duration of all experiments. Before each assay, animals were grown for three generations to reduce the multigenerational effects of starvation. A total of 214 wild strains were phenotyped for genome-wide association mapping. For linkage mapping, 219 recombinant inbred advanced intercross lines (RIAILs) were generated from a cross between an N2 strain, with the CB4856 npr-1 allele and a transposon insertion in the peel-1 gene (QX1430), and the Hawaiian wild strain CB4856 [25]. Near-isogenic lines (NILs) were generated by backcrossing a RIAIL of interest to a parent strain for several generations using PCR amplicons flanking insertion-deletion (indels) variants to track the introgressed region [30]. The NILs were whole-genome sequenced after backcrossing to verify that only the desired introgressed region was present. All strains (S1 File) are available and maintained by the Caenorhabditis Natural Diversity Resource (CaeNDR) [23].

CRISPR-Cas9-edited strains were generated within the lab or by Suny Biotech (Fuzhou, China). Suny Biotech generated the allele-replacement strains with the N2 (PD1074) background (PHX2701, PHX2702) and the CB4856 background (PHX2882, and PHX2883). Additional strains with single gene deletions of either cyp-35D1 or nhr-176, deletions of both genes, as well as strains with a K267D substitution, were generated using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing as previously described [16,20]. All oligonucleotides used for CRISPR-Cas9 editing and confirmation are found in S18 File. After injection, possibly edited strains underwent two generations of confirmation using Sanger sequencing, ensuring that strains were homozygous for the desired genotype. Two independent edits were generated to control for any potential off-target effects of editing.

Genome-wide association mapping

We phenotyped 214 wild strains of C. elegans in both DMSO and TBZ conditions as described previously [20]. Briefly, strains were passaged for three generations post-starvation on NGMA plates to alleviate multi-generational starvation effects. After passage, populations of each strain were bleach synchronized (Protocol available at https://andersenlab.org/Research/Protocols/) in triplicate to control for variation caused by bleach effects. Approximately 50 embryos were resuspended in 50 μL of K medium [41] and dispensed into 96-well plates and allowed to arrest overnight. The following day, arrested L1 larvae (first larval stage) were fed lyophilized bacterial lysate (E. coli HB101 strain) at 5 mg/mL in K medium. Nematodes were grown for 48 hours at 20°C with constant shaking at 180 rpm. Three L4 larvae (fourth larval stage) were sorted into a 96-well plate with 10 mg/mL of bacterial lysate, 50 μM kanamycin, and either 1% DMSO or 62.5 μM TBZ dissolved in 1% DMSO using a large-particle flow cytometer (COPAS BIOSORT, Union Biometrica; Holliston, MA). Animals were grown for 96 hours at 20°C with constant shaking at 180 rpm. The animals and their offspring were treated with sodium azide (50 mM in M9 buffer) to straighten the animals for accurate length measurements with the COPAS BIOSORT. Measurements collected in the high-throughput fitness assay were processed with the easysorter R (4.0.3) package [42]. Analysis was performed on a strain-specific basis as previously described [16,30,31].

We performed a genome-wide association mapping using the differences in responses of strains exposed to TBZ and DMSO conditions. The mean for time of flight (time it took for animal to pass through a laser) (mean.TOF) was used as a measure of animal length, and data were analyzed using the mapping pipeline NemaScan (https://github.com/AndersenLab/NemaScan) [43]. The phenotype data were mapped with and without the effects of ben-1 in the data to identify genes independent of known resistance mechanisms as described previously [20]. Briefly, strains with ben-1 loss of function mutations were identified and phenotypes were corrected using the following linear model: lm(animallength~(ben−1LoF)). Genotype data for the tested strains were acquired from the 20220216 CaeNDR release. NemaScan was run using default parameters in the mappings profile to perform association and fine mappings. Significance thresholds were determined using Bonferroni and Eigen significance values. The Bonferroni threshold is based on the number of markers in the analysis, and the Eigen threshold corrects for the number of genetically independent markers in the data set. The Eigen threshold takes advantage of the extensive linkage disequilibrium in C. elegans to limit the number of “unique” markers [44].

Linkage mapping

219 RIAILs [25] were phenotyped in both DMSO and TBZ (32.5 μM) conditions, as previously done for the genome-wide association study. Linkage mapping was performed on animal length (q90.TOF), as measured with the COPAS BIOSORT and processed with the easysorter R (4.0.3) package [42], with the linkagemapping (https://github.com/AndersenLab/linkagemapping) R package [30,45]. A cross object derived from the whole-genome sequencing data of the RIAILs containing 13,003 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) was merged with RIAIL phenotypes with the merge_pheno function with the argument set = 2. We used the fsearch function, adapted from the R/qtl package [46], to calculate the logarithm of the odds (LOD) score for every genetic marker and the animal length (mean.TOF) as -n(ln(1-R2)/2ln(10)) where R is the Pearson correlation coefficient between the genotype of the RIAIL marker and animal length [47]. We calculated a 5% genome-wide error rate by permuting the RIAIL phenotype data 1000 times. We categorized the peak QTL marker as the marker with the highest LOD score over the significance threshold. This marker was then used in the model as a cofactor and the mapping analysis was repeated until no further QTL were detected. We then used the annotate_lods function to calculate the effect size of the QTL and determine the 95% confidence intervals as defined by 1.5 LOD drop from the peak marker with the argument cutoff = “proximal.

High-throughput assays of edited strains

A previously described high-throughput fitness assay was used for all TBZ response phenotyping assays [48,49]. In the GWAS, strains were prepared as above. For each assay, each bleach of each strain had 96 replicates. Plates were then sealed with gas permeable sealing film (Fisher Cat #14-222-043), placed in humidity chambers, and incubated overnight at 20°C while shaking at 170 rpm (INFORS HT Multitron shaker). The following morning, arrested L1s were fed using frozen aliquots of HB101 E. coli suspended in K medium at an optical density 600 nm (OD600) of 100. HB101 aliquots were thawed at room temperature, combined, and diluted to OD60030 with K medium, and kanamycin was added at a concentration of 150 μM to inhibit further bacterial growth and prevent contamination. Final well concentration of HB101, prepared as above, with kanamycin was OD10 and 50 μM, respectively, and each well was treated with either 1% DMSO or 32.5 μM TBZ in 1% DMSO. Animals were grown for 48 hours with constant shaking, after which, animals were treated with 50 mM sodium azide in M9 buffer to straighten the animals. Following 10 minutes of exposure to sodium azide, each plate was imaged using a Molecular Devices ImageXpress Nano microscope (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA) with a 2X objective. Images were then processed using CellProfiler (https://github.com/AndersenLab/CellProfiler) and analyzed using easyXpress [48] to obtain animal lengths. Data were normalized and regressed as done previously [49,50]. Briefly, variation attributable to assay and replicate effects was regressed out using a linear model, and residual values were normalized with respect to the average control phenotype by subtracting the mean phenotype in control conditions from the corresponding phenotype in the TBZ condition. Normalized phenotype measurements were used in all downstream statistical analyses.

Competition assays

We used a previously established pairwise competition assay to assess organismal fitness [51]. Fitness is measured for seven generations by comparing the allele frequency of a test strain against the allele frequency of a wild-type control. Both strains harbor molecular barcodes to distinguish between the two strains using oligonucleotide probes complementary to each barcode allele. Ten L4 individuals of a test strain were placed onto a single 6 cm NGMA plate along with ten L4 individuals of the PTM229 strain (an N2 strain that contains a synonymous change in the dpy-10 locus that does not have any growth effects compared to the wild-type laboratory N2 strain) [51]. Ten independent NGMA plates of each competition were prepared for each strain in each test condition, 1% DMSO or 25 μM TBZ in 1% DMSO. Animals were grown for one week and transferred to a new plate of the same condition on a 0.5 cm3 NGMA piece from the starved plate. For generations 1, 3, 5, and 7, the remaining individuals on the starved plate were washed into a 15 mL conical tube with M9 buffer and allowed to settle. The pellet was transferred to labeled 1.7 mL microcentrifuge tubes and stored at -80°C. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QiagenCatalog #: 69506). We quantified the relative allele frequency of each strain as previously described [51]. In short, a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) approach with TaqMan probes (Applied Biosciences) was used. Extracted genomic DNA was purified with a Zymo DNA cleanup kit (D4064) and diluted to 1 ng/μL. Using TaqMan probes as described previously [51], the ddPCR was performed with EcoRI digestion during thermocycling and quantified with a BioRad QX200 device with standard probe absolute quantification settings. The TaqMan probes selectively bind to the wild-type and edited dpy-10 alleles, serving as markers to quantify the relative abundance of each experimental strain (wild-type dpy-10) and the reference strain (PTM229). Relative allele frequencies of each tested allele were calculated using the QuantaSoft software and default settings. Calculations of relative fitness were calculated by linear regression analysis to fit the data to a one-locus generic selection model [51].

Sample preparation for HPLC-HRMS

A 6 cm NGMA plate with a starved population was chunked to ten 10 cm NGMA plates for the N2, PHX2702, CB4856, and PHX2883 strains. Following 72 hours of growth, populations were bleach synchronized and diluted to approximately 1 embryo/μL in K medium, and 100 mL of the embryo solution, for each strain, was placed into 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, and allowed to hatch overnight with constant shaking at 180 rpm at 20°C. The following day, the hatched L1s were fed HB101 bacteria at a final concentration of OD60015 and were grown for 72 hours [52]. Strains were bleach synchronized again, and 750,000 embryos/strain were placed into 4 L flasks, at a concentration of approximately 1 embryo/μL, and allowed to hatch overnight and then fed as above. After 72 hours of growth, each flask was divided into three replicate flasks containing approximately 250,000 young adult animals. Aliquots of approximately 50,000 animals were removed from each flask, for a total of three replicates per strain, before treatment with TBZ at a final concentration of 50 μM; control cultures were treated with an equivalent volume of DMSO (vehicle). In addition to the initial samples, three replicate samples were taken for each strain after two or six hours of exposure to TBZ. Aliquots were subject to centrifugation at 254 g for 30 seconds, and then the supernatant was transferred to a new 50 mL conical. Worm pellets were rinsed twice with M9, followed by a single rinse with K medium to remove remaining bacteria. Worm pellets were transferred to 1.7 mL Eppendorf tubes. The supernatant and worm pellet samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80°C prior to extraction.

Worm pellets were lyophilized using a Labconco FreeZone 4.5 system for approximately eight hours, prior to disruption. Dried worm pellets were disrupted in a Spex 1600 MiniG tissue grinder after the addition of two stainless steel grinding balls to each sample. Eppendorf tubes were placed in a Cryoblock (Model 1660) cooled in liquid nitrogen, and samples were disrupted at 1,100 rpm for two cycles of 90 seconds, with cooling in between cycles. 1 ml of methanol was added to each Eppendorf tube, and then samples were briefly vortexed and rocked overnight at room temperature. Eppendorf tubes were centrifuged at 20,000 RCF for five minutes in an Eppendorf 5417R centrifuge. Approximately 900 μL of the resulting supernatant was transferred to a clean 4 mL glass vial, and 800 μL fresh methanol added to the sample. The sample was briefly vortexed, centrifuged as described, and the resulting supernatant was combined in the 4 mL glass vial. The extracts were concentrated to dryness in an SCP250EXP Speedvac Concentrator coupled to an RVT5105 Refrigerated Vapor Trap (Thermo Scientific). The resulting powder was resuspended in 150 μL of methanol, followed by vortex and brief sonication. This solution was subject to centrifugation at 20,000 RCF for 10 minutes to remove the precipitate. The resulting supernatant was transferred to an HPLC vial and analyzed by HPLC-HRMS.

HPLC-HRMS analysis

Reversed-phase chromatography was performed using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system controlled by Chromeleon Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and coupled to an Orbitrap Q-Exactive mass spectrometer controlled by Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) probe. Extracts prepared as described above were separated on an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 mm x 2.1 mm, particle size 1.8 μm) maintained at 40°C with a flow rate of 0.5 ml per minute. Solvent A: 0.1% formic acid (Fisher Chemical Optima LC/MS grade; A11750) in water (Fisher Chemical Optima LC/MS grade; W6-4); solvent B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (Fisher Chemical Optima LC/MS grade; A955-4). A/B gradient started at 1% B for three minutes after injection and increased linearly to 99% B at 20 minutes, followed by five minutes at 99% B, then back to 1% B over 0.1 minute and finally held at 1% B for an additional 2.9 minutes.

Mass spectrometer parameters: spray voltage, -3.0 kV / +3.5 kV; capillary temperature 380°C; probe heater temperature 400°C; sheath, auxiliary, and sweep gas, 60, 20, and 2 AU, respectively; S-Lens RF level, 50; resolution, 70,000 at m/z 200; AGC target, 3E6. Each sample was analyzed in negative (ESI−) and positive (ESI+) electrospray ionization modes with m/z range 70–1000. Parameters for MS/MS (dd-MS2): MS1 resolution, 70,000; AGC Target, 1E6. MS2 resolution, 17,500; AGC Target, 2E5. Maximum injection time, 60 msec; Isolation window, 1.0 m/z; stepped normalized collision energy (NCE) 10, 30; dynamic exclusion, 1.5 sec; top five masses selected for MS/MS per scan. Peak areas were determined using Xcalibur Qual Browser (v4.1.31.9 Thermo Scientific) using a 5-ppm window around the m/z of interest.

Yeast expression of mutant CYP-35D1

Site-directed mutagenesis (Q5 Site Mutagenesis Kit, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to create a glutamate variant at position 267 of the codon-optimized cDNA encoding C. elegans CYP-35D1. The plasmid carrying the constructed variant C. elegans cyp-35D1 gene was digested at the flanking restriction enzyme sites SpeI and HindIII. The digest was subsequently run on a 1% agarose gel for band excision and gel purification. The insert was then ligated into the ATCC p416 GAL1 yeast expression vector (URA3, AmpR selection markers; CEN6/ARSH4 origin of replication [53] and transformed into competent DH5a E. coli cells. Plasmid DNA was purified from a single colony for sequence verification and subsequent transformation into S. cerevisiae BY4741 (MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 pdr5Δ::hCPR_LEU2 snq2Δ::hb5_SpHIS5). Transformants were selected on SD-URA agar plates.

LC-MS/QTOF of yeast Lysates

Yeast incubation

P450-expressing yeast strains (wild-type and mutant (K267E)) as well as empty vector (EV) were incubated overnight in SD-URA selective medium with addition of 2% galactose with shaking on a rotating wheel at 37°C. OD600 was measured, and all strains were diluted to OD600 = 10 in a final volume of 495 μL using the same selective medium. 5 μL of either DMSO (as a control) or 10 mM TBZ in DMSO was then added to each tube, for final concentrations of 1% DMSO or 100 μM TBZ, respectively, with subsequent incubation for six hours at 37°C on a rotating wheel. Samples were prepared in technical triplicates, and each replicate was analyzed independently three times, unless otherwise noted. After the incubation, cells were filter-separated using Pall AcroPrep Advance 96-well filter plates (0.45 μm wwPTFE membrane, 1 ml well volume) on a vacuum manifold. Cells were then resuspended from the filter using 50 μL of autoclaved MilliQ water and frozen at -80°C in 1.5 mL microtubes (Sarstedt P/N 72.694.006) before being used for the lysis.

Yeast Lysis

Cell pellets were thawed before starting the extraction. 400 μL of ACS grade 1-butanol and 0.5 mm glass beads (BioSpec Products P/N 11079105) were added to all samples and vortexed briefly. Samples were then homogenized using BioSpec Mini-Beadbeater-16 homogenizer at 3450 oscillations per minute in cycles of 30 seconds on and 30 seconds off for six cycles in total. Samples were then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 14000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred to 1.5 mL Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes (Cat. No. 022363204). 400 μL of LC-MS grade methanol was added to the original tube with glass beads and homogenized the same way as with butanol. The samples were centrifuged again at the same speed and then transferred to the same Eppendorf Safe-Lock tube with butanol supernatant. Combined supernatants were dried at Eppendorf Vacufuge vacuum concentrator with a cold trap overnight at 30°C.

LC-MS/QTOF analysis

Dried samples were resuspended using 100 μL of 50:50 acetonitrile:water (LC-MS grade solvents) with brief vortexing and then sonicated in a water bath for 15 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 20817 rcf for 10 minutes. 25 μL of each sample was then transferred to the polypropylene inserts (Agilent P/N 5182–0549) in amber vials immediately before the LC-MS/QTOF run. QTOF analysis increases the specificity of LC-MS by including a quadrupole (Q) filter that increases specificity by only allowing ions with a specific mass-to-charge ratio to pass through and then uses time-of-flight (TOF) as a measure of ion size. Samples were analyzed using the Agilent 1260 Infinity II with 6545 LC/QTOF mass spectrometer in positive ionization mode with Dual AJS electrospray ionization (ESI) equipped with Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1x50mm, 1.8-μm particles) and ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 guard column (2.1x5mm, 1.8-μm particles). LC parameters used: injection volume 5μL with 10μL needle wash with sample, autosampler chamber temperature 4°C, column oven temperature 40°C. Mass spectrometry parameters used: gas temperature 320°C, drying gas flow eight liters per minute, nebulizer 35 psi, sheath gas 350°C at 11 liters per minute, VCap 3500V, Nozzle voltage 1000V, fragmentor 175V, skimmer 65V. The solvent gradient with the flow of 0.5 ml per minute started with 99% mobile phase A (Optima LC/MS H2O+0.1% Formic Acid, Fisher Chemical P/N LS118-4) and 1% mobile phase B (Optima LC/MS Acetonitrile+0.1% Formic Acid, Fisher Chemical P/N LS120-4), kept for three minutes, increased linearly to 99% B at 20 minutes, followed by five minutes at 99% B, then back to 1% B over 0.1 min and finally held at 1% B for an additional 2.9 minutes. The post-run time was three minutes (instrument conditioning at 99% mobile phase A). The raw data was analyzed using Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis 10.0. Counts of molecules with mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios specific to TBZ and TBZ-OH were collected, and the area under the curve of each peak was calculated to determine the abundance of each molecule. Abundance of TBZ-OH relative to the abundance of TBZ was calculated to quantify the enzyme effect. Genetic backgrounds of yeast strains expressing C. elegans cyp-35D1 were identical, so differences in metabolism were attributed to the specific version of cyp-35D1 expressed.

Generation of cyp-35D1 QTL region tree

We gathered genotype data for the QTL region (V:15734606–16365245) for strains present in the GWAS from the 20220216 VCF release from CaeNDR [23,24]. A tree was generated using the MUSCLE algorithm with default parameters [54]. Each point, representing an individual strain, in the tree was colored based on the allele at the 267 amino-acid position.

Collection of orthologous sequences of cyp-35D1

Orthologs of cyp-35D1 were identified in the three parental C. elegans strains used in this study (N2, CB4856, and DL238) and from representative strains from multiple supergroups within the Caenorhabditis genus using BLAST and the WormBase database [5557]. Caenorhabditis tropicalis, Caenorhabditis briggsae, and Caenorhabditis remanei represent different clades within the elegans supergroup [55]. We used Caenorhabditis becei and Caenorhabditis panamensis as the representatives for the japonica supergroup. Outside of the elegans and japonica supergroups, we chose Caenorhabditis bovis as a distantly related Caenorhabditis species. The four closest orthologs in the parasite H. contortus were also included. Diploscapter coronatus was included as an outgroup for our tree construction. A tree was generated using VCF-kit [58]. An additional analysis of all predicted nematode orthologs of CYP-35D1 was also performed. All relevant WormBase accessions for cyp-35D1 (and orthologs) sequences used can be found in S19 File.

Analysis of cyp-35D1 orthologs in Haemonchus contortus

The four most closely related cyp-35D1 orthologs from Haemonchus contortus were analyzed for nonsynonymous mutations at the locus of interest. Amplicon sequencing was performed for each ortholog on 128 archived H. contortus samples collected from farms in the USA, Canada, and the UK that have been exposed to high levels of fenbendazole selection (S15 File). In addition, Fecal Egg Count Reduction Trials (FECRT) have demonstrated fenbendazole resistance in 22 of these populations of animals. A couple of laboratory H. contortus BZ-resistant strains (MHco18 and MHco10) and a laboratory H. contortus BZ-sensitive strain (MHco3ISE) were also tested. Primers were designed to amplify a product of approximately 350 bp, spanning the region containing codon 267. We created adapted primers suitable for Illumina next-generation sequencing and prepared amplicons for sequencing using a standard two-step PCR approach [15]. Illumina barcode indices, as well as the P5/P7 sequencing regions were added to the amplicons from each sample using a second (limited cycle) PCR to allow the pooling of up to 384 different samples in a single Illumina MiSeq library. Four separate pooled libraries, one for each ortholog, were sequenced using a 500 bp paired-end reagent kit (MiSeq Reagent Kit v2, MS-103-2003) on an Illumina Desktop sequencer at a final concentration of 12 pM with the addition of 20% PhiX control v3 (Illumina, FC-110-3001). The raw sequencing reads were passed through a pipeline based on the analysis package DADA2 [59]. In brief, immediately following sequencing, raw data were demultiplexed, and the barcode indices were removed, resulting in the generation of FASTQ files for each sample. In turn, the pipeline removes primers from the sequence reads using the program Cutadapt [60] and then filters the reads based on size (>200 bp) and quality, using the filterAndTrim function to discard reads with a maximum of two expected errors in the forward read or five in the reverse read. DADA2 was used to generate error models and remove sequencing errors from raw reads [59]. Forward reads were then merged with the reverse reads, and possible chimeric sequences were removed from the dataset. Although the total number of samples sequenced was 128, data yield for analysis ranged between 103 and 118 samples for each ortholog. The resulting Amplified Sequence Variants (ASVs) were compared to the appropriate H. contortus reference sequence, and the frequency distribution of variation at position 267 in H. contortus ASVs across individual samples was generated.

Tajima’s D calculations

We calculated Tajima’s D [61] 25 kb upstream and 25 kb downstream of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 (V:16044238–16094238) using the scikit-allel package [62]. We calculated Tajima’s D genome-wide based on a 10 kb window with a 1 kb sliding window.

Statistical analysis

All statistical comparisons were performed in R (4.1.2) [63]. We used the Rstatix package tukeyHSD function on an ANOVA model generated with the formula phenotype ~ strain to calculate differences in the responses of the strains.

Supporting information

S1 File. Strains used in the manuscript.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s001.tsv (7.9KB, tsv)
S2 File. Processed phenotype data from GWAS.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s002.tsv (16.6KB, tsv)
S3 File. Processed mapping data from GWAS.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s003.tsv (3.5MB, tsv)
S4 File. Processed linkage mapping data.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s004.tsv (2.7MB, tsv)
S5 File. Processed ben-1 regressed phenotype data from GWAS.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s005.tsv (13.9KB, tsv)
S6 File. Processed ben-1 mapping data from GWAS.

(TSV)

S7 File. Processed data for peak marker in GWAS and linkage mapping experiments.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s007.tsv (2.2MB, tsv)
S8 File. Fine mapping data for the peak marker on chromosome V.

(ZIP)

ppat.1012602.s008.zip (2.2MB, zip)
S9 File. Processed HTA data for cyp-35D1 deletions and K267D mutants.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s009.csv (1.4MB, csv)
S10 File. Processed HTA data for cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 deletion comparisons.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s010.csv (1.3MB, csv)
S11 File. Processed HTA data for NILs and allele swap strains.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s011.csv (1.1MB, csv)
S12 File. Processed allele frequency data for competition assays.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s012.csv (14.1KB, csv)
S13 File. Processed relative fitness data for competition assays.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s013.csv (1.5KB, csv)
S14 File. Processed metabolomics data.

(XLSX)

ppat.1012602.s014.xlsx (113.7KB, xlsx)
S15 File. Processed yeast metabolomics data.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s015.csv (1.7KB, csv)
S16 File. Details of H. contortus populations and full results of amplicon sequencing.

(XLSX)

ppat.1012602.s016.xlsx (43.5KB, xlsx)
S17 File. Tajima’s D values around the nhr-176 cyp-35D1 locus.

(CSV)

ppat.1012602.s017.csv (1.7MB, csv)
S18 File. Oligonucleotide sequences used in the manuscript.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s018.tsv (2.5KB, tsv)
S19 File. Sequence accession information for all sequences used in analyses.

(TSV)

ppat.1012602.s019.tsv (434B, tsv)
S1 Fig. Regression of ben-1 variation emphasizes a prominent QTL on chromosome V.

(A) Distribution of normalized TBZ response after regression using ben-1 variation as a covariate is shown ordered from most susceptible to most resistant. The N2 and CB4856 strains are colored orange and blue, respectively. Strains with variation in ben-1 have a red triangle at the base of the bar for that strain. (B) Genome-wide association mapping results for animal length following ben-1 regression are shown. The genomic position is shown on the x-axis, and -log10(p) values are shown on the y-axis for each SNV. SNVs are colored pink if they pass the Eigen threshold (dashed horizontal line) or red if they pass the Bonferroni significance threshold (horizontal line).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s020.tif (432.9KB, tif)
S2 Fig. Phenotype by genotype plots for peak marker in genome-wide association mapping and linkage mapping confirm greater susceptibility in CB4856.

(A) Regressed animal length (mean.TOF) values in response to TBZ treatment in a genome-wide association study are shown on the y-axis. The x-axis denotes if a strain has the lysine (REF) or glutamate (ALT) alleles at the peak marker. Each point represents a strain’s normalized response from multiple replicates. (B) For the QTL discovered in the linkage mapping experiment, the regressed animal length (mean.TOF) is shown on the y-axis, and the allele of the tested recombinant strain is shown on the x-axis. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively.

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s021.tif (125KB, tif)
S3 Fig. NILs confirm region on chromosome V underlies TBZ response.

The strain tested is shown on the y-axis. (A) Chromosome V of each strain with the genotype at markers across chromosome V is shown. The x-axis shows the genomic position across the chromosome. A red line denotes the location of the QTL on chromosome V. The genomic background of the cyp-35D1 locus is shown orange for N2 and blue for CB4856. (C) Regressed animal length (mean.TOF) in response to TBZ treatment is shown on the x-axis. The ECA238 strain is a near-isogenic line in the N2 genetic background with a small introgression of the CB4856 genome around the identified chromosome V QTL from linkage mapping. The ECA239 strain is a near-isogenic line in the CB4856 background with a small introgression of the N2 genome around the identified QTL from linkage mapping. Data are shown as Tukey box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown to the right (p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s022.tif (125.4KB, tif)
S4 Fig. Fine mapping of the QTL region indicates that cyp-35D1 is correlated with response to TBZ in non-ben-1 regressed data and more so after regression.

Fine mapping of the QTL region on chromosome V is displayed for (A) non-ben-1-regressed data. Each gray bar represents a gene in the region of interest. Red bars indicate high-impact variants in the region, black arrows indicate the direction of gene transcription, and the association between TBZ response and the variant is shown on the y-axis. The location of cyp-35D1 is shown with a label and an arrow pointing to the gene and variant location

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s023.tif (182.7KB, tif)
S5 Fig. Deletion of cyp-35D1 confers greater levels of susceptibility than E267, and deletion of nhr-176 confers even greater levels of susceptibility.

The strain cyp-35D1 genotype (top) and nhr-176 genotype (bottom) are shown on the x-axis, with WT representing the wild type for each gene. N2 (orange) and CB4856 (blue) are shown with comparisons to strains within the same genetic background. Data from both independent edits for each edit are shown. Regressed median animal length values of response to TBZ are shown on the y-axis Each point represents a well that contains ~30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown above each strain (p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s024.tif (229.8KB, tif)
S6 Fig. Deletion of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 confers susceptibility equivalent to deletion of nhr-176 alone.

The strain cyp-35D1 genotype (top) and nhr-176 genotype (bottom) are shown on the x-axis with WT representing the wild type for each gene. N2 (orange) and CB4856 (blue) are shown for comparisons with genetic backgrounds. Regressed median animal length values of response to TBZ are shown on the y-axis Each point represents a well that contains ~30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown above each strain (p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s025.tif (153.7KB, tif)
S7 Fig. Amino acid substitution at codon 267 of cyp-35D1 confers increased susceptibility to TBZ in CRISPR-Cas9 edited strains.

The strain name is displayed on the y-axis. (A) The genomic background of the tested strain is shown as orange or blue for N2 and blue CB4856, respectively. The CYP-35D1 allele for the strain tested is shown as orange for K267 and blue for E267. (C) Regressed animal length (mean.TOF) values of response to TBZ are shown on the x-axis. Each point represents a well that contains hundreds of animals following 96 hours of TBZ treatment. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The left and right whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 25th and 75th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown to the right of each strain; N2 and CB4856 are also significantly different (p<0.05 = *, p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s026.tif (153.6KB, tif)
S8 Fig. Response of alleles at position 267 indicates that animals with aspartate are the most susceptible, followed by glutamate.

Regressed mean animal length values of responses to TBZ, both non-regressed by ben-1 (A) and regressed by ben-1 (B), are shown on the y-axis. Each point represents the regressed mean animal length value from hundreds of animals in a single well. The x-axis shows the CYP-35D1 allele. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively.

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s027.tif (157.2KB, tif)
S9 Fig. Aspartate substitution as position 267 does not confer susceptibility.

The strain name is displayed on the y-axis. Two independent edits for each allele change are shown. (A) The genomic background of the tested strain is shown as orange or cadet-blue for N2 and DL238, respectively. Alleles of CYP-35D1 are shown in the same color as the relevant parental genotype, and strains with an N2 background but with the glutamate allele are shown in blue. (B) Regressed median animal length values of response to TBZ are shown on the x-axis Each point represents a well that contains ~30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The left and right whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 25th and 75th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in com parison to the genomic background strain is shown above each strain (p > 0.05 = ns, p <0.01 = **, p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s028.tif (153.3KB, tif)
S10 Fig. The abundances of TBZ and TBZ metabolites in the endo-metabolomes two and six hours after exposure.

The change in the abundances of TBZ (A) and three metabolites: TBZ-OH (B), TBZ-O-glucoside (C), and TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside (D) are shown, with samples taken at two and six hours after exposure to 50 μM TBZ. CYP-35D1 alleles are shown on the x-axis with K267 (orange) and K267E (light gray) in the N2 genetic background, and E267 (blue) and E267K (dark gray) in the CB4856 genetic background. Abundances are shown as the log of abundance after normalization for the abundance of ascr#2. The line represents the mean abundance, and each point represents an individual replicate. Statistical significance between strains with the same genetic background at the same time point is shown (p > 0.05 = ns, p < 0.05 = *, p < 0.0001 = ****, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with Bonferroni correction t-test of Independent Replicates).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s029.tif (283.3KB, tif)
S11 Fig. The abundances of TBZ and TBZ metabolites in the exo-metabolomes two and six hours after exposure.

The change in the abundances of TBZ (A) and three metabolites: TBZ-OH (B), TBZ-O-glucoside (C), and TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside (D) are shown, with samples taken at two and six hours after exposure to 50 μM TBZ. CYP-35D1 alleles are shown on the x-axis with K267 (orange) and K267E (light gray) in the N2 genetic background, and E267 (blue) and E267K (dark gray) in the CB4856 genetic background. Abundances are shown as the log of abundance after normalization for the abundance of ascr#2. The line represents the mean abundance, and each point represents an individual replicate. Statistical significance between strains with the same genetic background at the same time point is shown (p > 0.05 = ns, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with Bonferroni correction t-test of Independent Replicates).

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s030.tif (270KB, tif)
S12 Fig. Tajima’s D around cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 locus.

The divergence measured by Tajima’s D surrounds the cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 locus on chromosome V. The most recent CaeNDR variant release was used to calculate Tajima’s D in this region [31,58].

(TIF)

ppat.1012602.s031.tif (81.1KB, tif)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Andersen lab for making reagents used in the experiments and their feedback in the preparation of this manuscript. We acknowledge the Caenorhabditis Natural Diversity Resource (NSF Capacity Grant 2224885) for providing the strains used in this study. Additionally, we would also like to acknowledge WormBase for providing an essential resource for genetic and genomic data used in this manuscript.

Data Availability

Scripts and data for this study are available at https://github.com/AndersenLab/2024_cyp35D1_TBZ_manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health NIAID grant R01AI153088 to ECA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. JBC was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health NIAID grant R01AI153088 to ECA.

References

  • 1.Hotez PJ, Aksoy S, Brindley PJ, Kamhawi S. World neglected tropical diseases day. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14: e0007999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller CM, Waghorn TS, Leathwick DM, Candy PM, Oliver A-MB, Watson TG. The production cost of anthelmintic resistance in lambs. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186: 376–381. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186: 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Howell SB, Burke JM, Miller JE, Terrill TH, Valencia E, Williams MJ, et al. Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance on sheep and goat farms in the southeastern United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;233: 1913–1919. doi: 10.2460/javma.233.12.1913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krücken J, Fraundorfer K, Mugisha JC, Ramünke S, Sifft KC, Geus D, et al. Reduced efficacy of albendazole against Ascaris lumbricoides in Rwandan schoolchildren. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2017;7: 262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Osei-Atweneboana MY, Awadzi K, Attah SK, Boakye DA, Gyapong JO, Prichard RK. Phenotypic evidence of emerging ivermectin resistance in Onchocerca volvulus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5: e998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doyle SR, Bourguinat C, Nana-Djeunga HC, Kengne-Ouafo JA, Pion SDS, Bopda J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of ivermectin response by Onchocerca volvulus reveals that genetic drift and soft selective sweeps contribute to loss of drug sensitivity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wit J, Dilks CM, Andersen EC. Complementary Approaches with Free-living and Parasitic Nematodes to Understanding Anthelmintic Resistance. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37: 240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doyle SR, Illingworth CJR, Laing R, Bartley DJ, Redman E, Martinelli A, et al. Population genomic and evolutionary modelling analyses reveal a single major QTL for ivermectin drug resistance in the pathogenic nematode, Haemonchus contortus. BMC Genomics. 2019;20: 218. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5592-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Doyle SR, Laing R, Bartley D, Morrison A, Holroyd N, Maitland K, et al. Genomic landscape of drug response reveals mediators of anthelmintic resistance. Cell Rep. 2022;41: 111522. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Driscoll M, Dean E, Reilly E, Bergholz E, Chalfie M. Genetic and molecular analysis of a Caenorhabditis elegans beta-tubulin that conveys benzimidazole sensitivity. J Cell Biol. 1989;109: 2993–3003. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kwa MS, Kooyman FN, Boersema JH, Roos MH. Effect of selection for benzimidazole resistance in Haemonchus contortus on beta-tubulin isotype 1 and isotype 2 genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;191: 413–419. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kwa MS, Veenstra JG, Roos MH. Benzimidazole resistance in Haemonchus contortus is correlated with a conserved mutation at amino acid 200 in beta-tubulin isotype 1. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994;63: 299–303. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(94)90066-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kwa MS, Veenstra JG, Van Dijk M, Roos MH. Beta-tubulin genes from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus modulate drug resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol. 1995;246: 500–510. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Avramenko RW, Redman EM, Melville L, Bartley Y, Wit J, Queiroz C, et al. Deep amplicon sequencing as a powerful new tool to screen for sequence polymorphisms associated with anthelmintic resistance in parasitic nematode populations. Int J Parasitol. 2019;49: 13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dilks CM, Hahnel SR, Sheng Q, Long L, McGrath PT, Andersen EC. Quantitative benzimidazole resistance and fitness effects of parasitic nematode beta-tubulin alleles. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2020;14: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2020.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dilks CM, Koury EJ, Buchanan CM, Andersen EC. Newly identified parasitic nematode beta-tubulin alleles confer resistance to benzimidazoles. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2021;17: 168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2021.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mohammedsalih KM, Krücken J, Khalafalla A, Bashar A, Juma F-R, Abakar A, et al. New codon 198 β-tubulin polymorphisms in highly benzimidazole resistant Haemonchus contortus from goats in three different states in Sudan. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13: 114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Venkatesan A, Jimenez Castro PD, Morosetti A, Horvath H, Chen R, Redman E, et al. Molecular evidence of widespread benzimidazole drug resistance in Ancylostoma caninum from domestic dogs throughout the USA and discovery of a novel β-tubulin benzimidazole resistance mutation. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19: e1011146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hahnel SR, Zdraljevic S, Rodriguez BC, Zhao Y, McGrath PT, Andersen EC. Extreme allelic heterogeneity at a Caenorhabditis elegans beta-tubulin locus explains natural resistance to benzimidazoles. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14: e1007226. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zamanian M, Cook DE, Zdraljevic S, Brady SC, Lee D, Lee J, et al. Discovery of genomic intervals that underlie nematode responses to benzimidazoles. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12: e0006368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crook EK, O’Brien DJ, Howell SB, Storey BE, Whitley NC, Burke JM, et al. Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance on sheep and goat farms in the mid-Atlantic region and comparison of in vivo and in vitro detection methods. Small Rumin Res. 2016;143: 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Crombie TA, McKeown R, Moya ND, Evans KS, Widmayer SJ, LaGrassa V, et al. CaeNDR, the Caenorhabditis Natural Diversity Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52: D850–D858. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cook DE, Zdraljevic S, Roberts JP, Andersen EC. CeNDR, the Caenorhabditis elegans natural diversity resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45: D650–d657. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Andersen EC, Shimko TC, Crissman JR, Ghosh R, Bloom JS, Seidel HS, et al. A Powerful New Quantitative Genetics Platform, Combining Caenorhabditis elegans High-Throughput Fitness Assays with a Large Collection of Recombinant Strains. G3. 2015;5: 911–920. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.017178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gordon H. Thiabendazole: a Highly Effective Anthelmintic for Sheep. Nature. 1961;191: 1409–1410. doi: 10.1038/1911409a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jones LM, Flemming AJ, Urwin PE. NHR-176 regulates cyp-35d1 to control hydroxylation-dependent metabolism of thiabendazole in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem J. 2015;466: 37–44. doi: 10.1042/BJ20141296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jones LM, Rayson SJ, Flemming AJ, Urwin PE. Adaptive and specialised transcriptional responses to xenobiotic stress in Caenorhabditis elegans are regulated by nuclear hormone receptors. PLoS One. 2013;8: e69956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sural S, Hobert O. Nematode nuclear receptors as integrators of sensory information. Curr Biol. 2021;31: 4361–4366.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brady SC, Zdraljevic S, Bisaga KW, Tanny RE, Cook DE, Lee D, et al. A Novel Gene Underlies Bleomycin-Response Variation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2019;212: 1453–1468. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Evans KS, Wit J, Stevens L, Hahnel SR, Rodriguez B, Park G, et al. Two novel loci underlie natural differences in Caenorhabditis elegans abamectin responses. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17: e1009297. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Knox J, Burns AR, Cooke B, Cammalleri SR, Kitner M, Ching J, et al. Cyprocide selectively kills nematodes via cytochrome P450 bioactivation. Nat Commun. 2024;15: 5529. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49738-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Doyle SR, Tracey A, Laing R, Holroyd N, Bartley D, Bazant W, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic variation defines the chromosome-scale assembly of Haemonchus contortus, a model gastrointestinal worm. Commun Biol. 2020;3: 656. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01377-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kellerová P, Raisová Stuchlíková L, Matoušková P, Štěrbová K, Lamka J, Navrátilová M, et al. Sub-lethal doses of albendazole induce drug metabolizing enzymes and increase albendazole deactivation in Haemonchus contortus adults. Vet Res. 2020;51: 94. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00820-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jakobs N, Andreotti S, Ramünke S, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Krücken J. Differences in constitutive gene expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and ATP-binding cassette transporter gene expression between a susceptible and a highly macrocyclic lactone-resistant Haemonchus contortus isolate in the absence of drug-inducible expression. Parasit Vectors. 2024;17: 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Crofts TS, Men Y, Alvarez-Cohen L, Taga ME. A bioassay for the detection of benzimidazoles reveals their presence in a range of environmental samples. Front Microbiol. 2014;5: 592. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Perruchon C, Pantoleon A, Veroutis D, Gallego-Blanco S, Martin-Laurent F, Liadaki K, et al. Characterization of the biodegradation, bioremediation and detoxification capacity of a bacterial consortium able to degrade the fungicide thiabendazole. Biodegradation. 2017;28: 383–394. doi: 10.1007/s10532-017-9803-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.de Oliveira Neto OF, Arenas AY, Fostier AH. Sorption of thiabendazole in sub-tropical Brazilian soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24: 16503–16512. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9226-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shaver AO, Andersen EC. Integrating metabolomics into the diagnosis and investigation of anthelmintic resistance. Trends Parasitol. 2024;40: 1097–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2024.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Andersen EC, Bloom JS, Gerke JP, Kruglyak L. A variant in the neuropeptide receptor npr-1 is a major determinant of Caenorhabditis elegans growth and physiology. PLoS Genet. 2014;10: e1004156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boyd WA, Smith MV, Freedman JH. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model in Developmental Toxicology. In: Harris C, Hansen JM, editors. Developmental Toxicology: Methods and Protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2012. pp. 15–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shimko TC, Andersen EC. COPASutils: an R package for reading, processing, and visualizing data from COPAS large-particle flow cytometers. PLoS One. 2014;9: e111090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Widmayer SJ, Evans KS, Zdraljevic S, Andersen EC. Evaluating the power and limitations of genome-wide association studies in Caenorhabditis elegans. G3. 2022;12. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zdraljevic S, Fox BW, Strand C, Panda O, Tenjo FJ, Brady SC, et al. Natural variation in C. elegans arsenic toxicity is explained by differences in branched chain amino acid metabolism. Elife. 2019;8. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Evans KS, Andersen EC. The Gene scb-1 Underlies Variation in Caenorhabditis elegans Chemotherapeutic Responses. G3. 2020;10: 2353–2364. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Broman KW, Wu H, Sen Ś, Churchill GA. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003;19: 889–890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo WT, Lite T-LV, Kruglyak L. Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature. 2013;494: 234–237. doi: 10.1038/nature11867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nyaanga J, Crombie TA, Widmayer SJ, Andersen EC. easyXpress: An R package to analyze and visualize high-throughput C. elegans microscopy data generated using CellProfiler. PLoS One. 2021;16: e0252000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Widmayer SJ, Crombie TA, Nyaanga JN, Evans KS, Andersen EC. C. elegans toxicant responses vary among genetically diverse individuals. Toxicology. 2022;479: 153292. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shaver AO, Wit J, Dilks CM, Crombie TA, Li H, Aroian RV, et al. Variation in anthelmintic responses are driven by genetic differences among diverse C. elegans wild strains. bioRxiv. 2022. p. 2022.11.26.518036. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.26.518036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhao Y, Long L, Xu W, Campbell RF, Large EE, Greene JS, et al. Changes to social feeding behaviors are not sufficient for fitness gains of the Caenorhabditis elegans N2 reference strain. Elife. 2018;7. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nyaanga J, Goss C, Zhang G, Ahmed HN, Andersen EJ. Physical constraints on growth dynamics guide C. elegans developmental trajectories and animal shape. bioRxiv. 2021. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.01.438121v1.abstract [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Montalibet J, Kennedy BP. Using yeast to screen for inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68: 1807–1814. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.06.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stevens L, Rooke S, Falzon LC, Machuka EM, Momanyi K, Murungi MK, et al. The Genome of Caenorhabditis bovis. Curr Biol. 2020;30: 1023–1031.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stevens L, Félix M-A, Beltran T, Braendle C, Caurcel C, Fausett S, et al. Comparative genomics of 10 new Caenorhabditis species. Evol Lett. 2019;3: 217–236. doi: 10.1002/evl3.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sternberg PW, Van Auken K, Wang Q, Wright A, Yook K, Zarowiecki M, et al. WormBase 2024: status and transitioning to Alliance infrastructure. Genetics. 2024;227. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cook DE, Andersen EC. VCF-kit: assorted utilities for the variant call format. Bioinformatics. 2017;33: 1581–1582. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13: 581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Martin M. cutadapt: Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from sequencing reads. Github; Available from: https://github.com/marcelm/cutadapt
  • 61.Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123: 585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Miles A, Bot P io, R. M, Ralph P, Harding N, Pisupati R, et al. cggh/scikit-allel: v1.3.3. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4759368 [DOI]
  • 63.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

James J Collins III, Adler R Dillman

24 Oct 2024

PPATHOGENS-D-24-02017Naturally occurring variation in a cytochrome P450 modifies thiabendazole responses independent of beta-tubulinPLOS Pathogens Dear Dr. Andersen, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Pathogens. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Pathogens's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript within 60 days Dec 23 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plospathogens@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Adler R. Dillman, Ph.D.Academic EditorPLOS Pathogens James Collins IIISection EditorPLOS Pathogens Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064   Journal Requirements: Additional Editor Comments (if provided): The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the manuscript as it currently stands. Based upon my own reading of the manuscript and the consensus of the three reviewers, this is a very interesting and thorough study of a non-ben-1-based genetic polymorphism that modulates resistance to thiobendazole. The use of powerful tools to advance our understanding of the importance of this polymorphism in explaining resistance and susceptibility of C. elegans and find supporting metabolic evidence both in C. elegans and in yeast. Overall the experiments were very thorough and the progression of the manuscript is good. In the aggregate, the three reviewers outline several major issues that the authors will need to address, and I agree with these. It seems that the concerns and suggested revisions are intentionally limited in scope and feasible to address. The reviewer comments will help flesh out and improve a manuscript that is already of high quality. I look forward to seeing the revised version. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' Comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: In “Naturally occurring variation in a cytochrome P450 modifies thiabendazole responses independent of beta-tubulin”, Collins and colleagues describe their investigation of the basis of naturally occurring nematicide resistance in a large collection of wild isolates of the free-living soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. They report discovering a polymorphism in a cytochrome P450 gene that promotes the resistance of animals to thiabendazole and affects thiabendazole metabolism in C. elegans and when the protein is expressed in yeast. They seek evidence for whether an equivalent polymorphism might arise in isolates of the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus that have been exposed to a related nematicide.

This is an important field of study, and the authors have deployed powerful tools to advance our understanding of it. They thoroughly demonstrate the functional importance of this polymorphism in explaining resistance and susceptibility of the laboratory standard wild type strain and wild isolates of C. elegans, and find supporting metabolic evidence both in C. elegans and in yeast. The authors’ findings seem very appropriate for this journal.

I list below a large number of comments, questions, and suggestions for the authors to consider, both experimental and in describing their results. I realize that the comments achieve significant length, but I have tried to be restrained in proposing time-consuming experiments, and some experimental issues that I mention might reasonably be ignored at this time, or addressed only by considering them in writing. There are however some experimental issues that should be addressed for a basic understanding of the nematicide resistance polymorphism the authors have found, including whether the cyp-35D1 267K polymorphism provides resistance to nematicides related to thiabendazole; its effectiveness against different dosages of nematicide, and especially against dosages relevant to those used medically and agriculturally; and whether the resistance phenotype is dominant or recessive at relevant dosages.

Reviewer #2: Collins et al. have produced an important and high-quality analysis of a non-ben-1-based genetic polymorphism in Caenorhabditis elegans that modulates resistance to thiobendazole, a drug closely related to a key antihelmintic albendazole that is under heavy pressure from the rise of genetic resistance in Haemonchus contortus and other parasitic nematodes. I do not have any serious criticisms of this work; I only have some comments on the evolution of cyp-35d1 homologs, thoughts about possibly interesting implications of the authors' work, and some proposed minor textual revisions.

Reviewer #3: Collins et al. report a polymorphism impacting thiabendazole resistance in C. elegans. Notably, this allele impacts resistance independently of tubulin genes, which have been frequently implicated in anthelminthic resistance. They perform reciprocal gene editing experiments to show that the allele is causative, and they also perform MS to examine the impacts of this allele on thiabendazole metabolism. All together, this is a valuable study that should be of interest to the readership of this journal.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1) Dosage of thiabendazole (TBZ) used is not always clearly presented. The dosages used are never compared to dosages used medically or agriculturally or encountered environmentally, a question of obvious relevance that is never mentioned. No comparison is made between the level of TBZ resistance achieved through the cytochrome 267K polymorphism and that possible through mutation of the tubulin gene ben-1. A dose-response assay would seem ideal, comparing relevant cyp-35D1 genotypes to each other and potentially to ben-1 mutants, but at the least this should be discussed and should be considered more thoroughly.

2) At one point in the manuscript (circa line 434) the authors state that although they have used TBZ throughout this study, another related molecule fenbendazole (FBZ) is now in much greater use than TBZ. For example, the H. contortus isolates examined for cyp-35D1 homolog mutations had been treated not with TBZ but with FBZ. It would be good to show whether mutations of cyp-35D1 can affect susceptibility to FBZ in C. elegans. This also applies to albendazole (ABZ), which is only mentioned once in the manuscript to cite a reference.

3) The authors demonstrate that under laboratory conditions, over a few generations, there might not be any deleterious or advantageous effect of the cyp-35D1 267K polymorphism in competition assays. This result could be very important, but the data indicating it seem to be limited. Laboratory culture conditions are not highly selective. Furthermore, it isn’t clear from the authors’ presentation of the data (Figure 3A) whether there is indeed no difference between the 267E and 267K alleles; the authors report no statistically significant difference, but there appears possibly to be both increased variation and a downward trend from the 267E allele. It is possible that an increased number of trials or an increase in number of generations would result in this trend achieving statistical significance – which could in turn explain why the 267K polymorphism became fixed over many generations of culturing C. elegans under these same laboratory conditions prior to the strain first being frozen. The authors also do not report whether there is any effect of cyp-35D1 deletion alleles, either in competition assays or by measuring brood size and time to maturation. Similarly the authors do not discuss whether there are any reported effects on health or fecundity of TBZ resistance mutations in ben-1.

4) The authors report looking for cytochrome P450 changes corresponding to the 267K polymorphism in the genomes of selected Caenorhabditis nematodes and by sequencing samples from 128 samples of FBZ-exposed populations of the parasitic nematode H. contortus. In none of these do they report finding a 267K polymorphism, including none arising in the FBZ-exposed H. contortus (in which context it seems again relevant that the authors do not report having tested whether C. elegans with the 267K genotype are resistant to FBZ). The authors should look more systematically at nematode genomes, and should more thoroughly describe the cytochrome P450 phylogeny in nematodes. An admittedly sloppy survey of Caenorhabditis finds that the first BLAST hit when querying with C. elegans CYP-35D1 often – perhaps half of the time – finds an asparagine at the position corresponding to amino acid 267 of CYP-35D1. One of the four H. contortus homologs of CYP-35D1 that the authors describe also has this 267N sequence, which the authors note but do not discuss. It’s possible these homologous proteins (both the Caenorhabditis homologs with 267N and the H. contortus protein with 267N) are orthologous to cytochromes of C. elegans other than CYP-35D1 (there is at least one C. elegans cytochrome with an asparagine at this position), but the authors should discuss this. Moreover, 267K sequence can be found in at least two other nematode species (the pine tree nematode Bursaphelenchus okinawaensis and the mammalian parasite Strongyloides stercoralis), and still other amino acids can be found in this position in highly ranked BLAST hits from other available nematode genomes (Q in Deladenus siricidicola, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, Poikilolaimus oxycercus, and Steinernema carpocapsae; also G in Steinernema carpocapsae; and P in Panagrellus redivivus). It is striking that the authors experimentally investigated the 267D polymorphism found in one isolate of C. elegans (a highly conservative change from 267E that can be found in many homologs of CYP-35D1 throughout nematodes) but do not discuss any other variants, not even the asparagine variant they report having found in H. contortus.

5) nhr-176 is mentioned extremely briefly in the manuscript, is squarely in the region implicated by genetic mapping, and according to the literature described by the authors is directly relevant to TBZ resistance, but almost as soon as it is mentioned nhr-176 is discarded from the manuscript, a choice that is never fully explained. This is particularly striking on line 110 (“We further narrowed this region to two candidate genes including the cytochrome P450 [gene] cyp-35d1”). The other gene in that region is nhr-176, which is not mentioned. At no point do the authors clearly state that nhr-176 is immediately adjacent to cyp-35D1 and even appears at a glance to be co-transcribed with cyp-35D1 in a single operon.

6) Speaking of the possibility that nhr-176 and cyp-35D1 might be in an operon: the authors report generating deletion mutants of each gene, but do not report whether either deletion allele impairs the other gene, either by looking for the expression of the mRNA or by using complementation to test the function of the other gene. The authors mutate both genes separately in cis, without first demonstrating whether they had already functionally done so by disrupting the potential operon.

7) The authors do not report testing whether TBZ resistance caused by the 267K polymorphism of cyp-35D1 is dominant or recessive, at any dosage of TBZ, nor do they state what is known about dominant or recessive action of ben-1 mutations. This seems of obvious importance, especially for parasitic nematode species that might homozygose newly emerging mutations less quickly than does the selfing hermaphrodite C. elegans.

8) The authors report different levels of activity when different versions of CYP-35D1 are expressed in yeast from identical plasmids. They don’t report doing anything to confirm identical levels of protein expression or stability in their transgenic yeast. I believe the plasmids they used should avoid issues of plasmid copy number, but even so the reader should be reassured that these potential caveats have been addressed experimentally or at least that they have been considered and discarded according to the standard of the field.

Reviewer #2: I see no new key experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be required for acceptance.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 9) According to WormBase the C. elegans gene name is “cyp-35D1”, not (as it consistently appears in the manuscript) “cyp-35d1”. I believe the H. contortus gene homologous to C. elegans ben-1 may be “Hco-tbb-iso-1” (it appears in the literature in that way at least once), but it surely cannot be “Hco-isotype-1”, as it appears in this manuscript at least twice.

10) Colors are used in histograms in the Figures that are frequently not mentioned in the legends and are not obviously consistent from figure to figure.

11) Line 83: It is striking that the introduction considers parasitic nematodes and their relevance to human and veterinary health, but does not mention plant-parasitic nematodes and their control in agriculture. This might easily be relevant to the emergence of TBZ-resistant phenotypes in free-living soil nematodes such as C. elegans, and also to the presence of a polymorphism equivalent to cyp-35D1 267K in the plant-feeding nematode Bursaphelenchus okinawaensis. The authors similarly do not mention the use of TBZ and related drugs against parasitic invertebrates other than nematodes.

12) Line 142: The text says “Highly TBZ-resistant strains had predicted loss-of-function variation in ben-1 (Fig 1A)”. Every strain in Figure 1A marked with a red triangle (defined as “with variation in ben-1”) demonstrates increased sensitivity to ben-1, not increased resistance. This is confusing.

13) Line 148: List the six beta tubulin genes, here or in the Methods.

14) Line 152: The text here attributes to reference 19 a distinction between the QTLs on LGII and on LGV in their interactions with the ben-1 locus. This distinction is not obviously made in reference 19, which states that controlling for variation in ben-1 “resulted in the disappearance of the two QTL on chromosome II and the QTL on chromosome V”. Please clarify.

15) Line 183 (Figure 1): The label in the figure “Neither” could be clearer. The legend should state that 214 strains are shown.

16) Line 272: The manuscript states that introduction of the 267E polymorphism to the N2 strain did not appear to reduce TBZ metabolism, even though the corresponding and opposite change in CB4856 increased metabolism. This is briefly stated and is never discussed.

17) Line 277: “yeast” should be “Saccharomyces cerevisiae”. Also, a glance at the literature indicates that expression of metazoan cytochromes in yeast to test their metabolic function is a standard method, but this is not made obvious in the manuscript, nor is it mentioned why it’s seen as an appropriate system – and unless I have overlooked it none of this literature seems to have been cited in the Results, the Discussion, or the Methods.

18) Line 285 (Figure 4): Four asterisks is not defined in the legend. Strain backgrounds could be more clearly labeled, rather than being inferred from starting genotype.

19) Line 318: Should “area” be plural? I am confused by this statement.

20) Line 320: This dendrogram is offered to the reader, but is never explained to them. Does it indicate a single, relatively recent origin of the 267K polymorphism, that has been spread rapidly? How much more information or at least argumentation can be extracted from this dendrogram?

21) Lines 322-325: This is an argument to be made in the Discussion, not the Results. Also, given that the 267K polymorphism appears to be at worst neutral, the argument should be made at greater length, potentially citing relevant work.

22) Line 328 (Figure 6): In designing figures the authors should consider the incidence of color-blindness. Also, as mentioned previously, extremely little effort is made to explain the figure to the reader or to discuss its significance. This is frequent throughout the manuscript.

23) Line 398: The authors propose that the TBZ-resistant cyp-35D1 polymorphism might have arisen in the strain N2 and become common in isolates more recently found around the world because of the presence in the environment of human-used TBZ and related drugs, and also naturally occurring related molecules. Please clarify when use of TBZ or related molecules began, and whether this could explain why a C. elegans isolate obtained in Bristol more than five decades ago and subsequently frozen has this TBZ resistance polymorphism.

24) Line 423: I assume “predicted high impact” means a nonconservative coding change?

25) Line 424: “although we can draw no conclusions about the resistance status”. This seems like it could be overcome, if this were desired.

26) Line 434: Expand on the statement about the discontinued use of TBZ. Why was it stopped? When was it stopped? Is the cyp-35D1 267K polymorphism specific to TBZ, versus other related drugs?

27) Line 465: This section is unclear. Were 219 new RIAILs generated for use in this study, according to the methods described in reference 22, or is this study referring to a subset of the 359 RIAILs generated in that referenced work? Were the sequence reads deposited in the Short Read Archive?

28) Line 471: Despite the statement that all strains are listed in Supplementary File 1 and are available from the CaeNDR, Supplementary File 1 does not list 219 RIAILs, does not seem to obviously list any RIAILs. Were the RIAILs generated for this study, or not? If so, were they all preserved? Were any preserved?

29) Line 471: Supplementary File 1 does not appear to list the cyp-35D1 nhr-176 double mutants used in Figures S5 and S6.

30) Line 473: This paragraph does not mention the generation of the double deletion mutants used in Figures S5 and S6.

31) Line 473: Mention here in the Methods that oligonucleotide sequences are in Supplementary File 1.

32) Line 473: Oligos listed in Supplementary File 1 include the “First crispr guide for cyp-35D1 deletion” but not any second guide, nor any oligonucleotide or construct used to guide repair, nor do they list any reagents for the nhr-176 deletions.

33) Line 477: The sequence changes in the deletion alleles are not described (and as mentioned above the sequences of the reagents used to generate them are not provided).

34) Line 485: Give or cite a detailed protocol for “bleach synchronized”.

35) Lines 488 and 490: “L1” and “L4” are not defined.

36) Line 628: Name, cite, and/or acknowledge the codon optimization tool used. Provide codon-optimized sequences in the Supplementary Files or upon request. Provide more information about site-directed mutagenesis: cite a reference or name a kit, at least. Note that any oligonucleotides used in this section are not included in Supplementary File 1.

37) Line 693: Provide accession numbers or other identifying information for the sequences used.

38) Line 746: WormBase should be cited according to the FAQ on their website.

39) Line 983 (Figure S2): Legend should do more to explain the figure to the reader.

40) Line 1009 (Figure S4): Black angle-bracket shapes (gene models maybe?) are not mentioned in the legend, and nhr-176 is not marked in the figure.

41) Line 1016 (Figure S5): Top and bottom rows below the figure should be labeled in the figure, not merely described in the legend. “WT” should be defined in the legend. Allele numbers should be stated, not merely “del”, considering that the whole point appears to be that two different deletion alleles were used. The 2nd, 3rd, 7th, and 8th rows all have equivalent genotypes, but the reason for this, and for the comparisons being made, is not clear. Yellow and blue colors in histograms not explained.

42) Line 1044 (Figure S6): Comments to Figure S5 apply.

43) Line 1061 (Figure S7): Single asterisk not defined in legend. Comparisons are not “above each strain”. Strain names should be labeled as strain names in the figure. Legend should clarify whether these are introgression strains or CRISPR strains.

44) Line 1095 (Figure S9): Dark blue not defined in legend with other colors. Typo in figure heading. Figure legend refers to a part C not in evidence. Parts A and B are not separate from each other.

45) Line 1108 (Figure S10): Legend defines a two-asterisk condition not present in the manuscript.

46) Line 1132 (Figure S12): I do not think this figure is mentioned in the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: EVOLUTION OF CYP-35D1

Lines 340-342: The authors write, "The relative distance between the elegans and japonica groups suggests that the elegans group cyp-35d1 has recently evolved and is not closely related to cyp genes in other Caenorhabditis species." I think this is probably a mistaken interpretation that arises from a poorly-publicized defect of the C. japonica genome that is still the one official C. japonica genome in ParaSite (https://parasite.wormbase.org), for reasons explained immediately below.

Figure 7: The authors intelligently picked both C. japonica and C. panamensis as representatives of the japonica supergroup (as described in their Methods). Their phylogeny shows that C. panamensis has a cyp-35d1 ortholog that falls phylogenetically within the C. bovis outgroup ortholog. However, their phylogeny has one putative C. japonica ortholog that falls completely outside the otherwise monophyletic Caenorhabditis clade in their Figure 7A phylogeny.

I think the reason they got this strange result is that the C. japonica genome, unlike almost every other Caenorhabditis genome assembly that was produced from 2010 onward, is incomplete (despite the fact that it was assembled early and expensively by the genome center at Washington University). This fact can be easily observed by going to the species genome page at ParaSite (https://parasite.wormbase.org/species.html) and looking at BUSCO scores for the 22 Caenorhabditis species' genomes on that page. There are 18 Caenorhabditis species' genome sequences that have genome BUSCO completeness scores of 97.0% to 98.6%. In contrast, the C. japonica genome assembly has a genome BUSCO completeness score of 92.4% (whereas the equivalent score for C. panamensis is 97.8%). I therefore suspect that in real life, C. japonica has a much closer ortholog of cyp-35d1 that on a phylogenetic tree would cluster very closely with the ortholog from C. panamensis. There does exist a (so far unpublished) superior C. japonica genome assembly by Lewis et al. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCA_963572235.1) that the authors might search for a better cyp-35d1 ortholog (though they would need to manually annotate such a gene; the new and improved C. japonica genome is so far unannotated with protein-coding genes). Alternatively, the authors might replace C. japonica with some other japonica supergroup species with a better-assembled and annotated genome, and recompute their phylogeny and multiple sequence alignment in Figure 7 using a japonica-supergroup replacement for C. japonica. However, I do think that the authors should not continue taking their results with C. japonica at face value, and making statements about the evolution of this gene based on what may be only an apparently high divergence of this gene in C. japonica.

POSSIBLY INTERESTING IMPLICATIONS

1. The authors show a tight association between two adjacent genes in C. elegans, cyp-35d1 and nhr-176. Examining WormBase (https://wormbase.org) for their expression data shows that both of these genes are strongly expressed in the intestine. Surai and Hobert ([2021], PubMed 34348120) showed that many nhr genes in C. elegans appear to be expressed in neurons and may act to amplify sensory responses by binding to small molecules and then upregulating seven-transmembrane receptors for those small molecules. The authors' work on nhr-176 shows an interesting counterexample in which an NHR protein is not used for sensory responses in neurons but for detoxification responses in the intestine. This may be a more general phenomenon in nematodes.

2. The authors scanned many genomes of fenbendazole-resistant Haemonchus contortus isolates for lysine alleles in four H. contortus orthologs of cyp-35d1. I can confirm that orthology analysis identifies precisely these four genes, and that one of these four genes (HCON_00022670) has strongly intestine-biased RNA-seq expression (as computed from published data by Laing et al. [2013], PubMed 23985316). However, in addition to these four strict orthologs, H. contortus' genome also encodes 21 other cyp genes (defined by presence of the Pfam motif p450 [PF00067.25]), of which four show intestinal-biased gene expression. I find that three of them have more strongly intestinally-biased expression than HCON_00022670.

Gene FC FDR

HCON_00141025 8.10319755 3.11e-23

HCON_00084620 3.549094835 1.22e-12

HCON_00143950 3.39756099 1.21e-19

HCON_00022670 2.974729846 6.90e-13 # cyp-35d1 ortholog

HCON_00024010 2.678863 2.98e-14

FC == Hco_fem_gut vs. Hco_fem_worm log2FC

FDR == Hco_fem_gut vs. Hco_fem_worm FDR

It is outside the scope of this paper, but in future work, the authors may wish to scan these other H. contortus cyp genes with strongly intestinal expression for lysine alleles in fenbendazole-resistant isolates, since the selective presssure of albendazole resistance may lead to mutations in intestinal nhr genes that are not strictly orthologous to cyp-35d1. In their Discussion, the authors may wish to note the possibility that resistance alleles may arise in H. contortus cyp genes that are not strict cyp-35d1 orthologs but do have strong intestinally expression and thus are possible detoxification enzymes.

PROPOSED MINOR TEXTUAL REVISIONS

Title --

Line 2: "independent" should read "independently" (since it is an adverb modifying the verb 'modifies').

Abstract --

Line 55: "identified by another mapping technique" might be better written more specifically; maybe it could be something like "identified by linkage and fine mapping"?

Author summary --

Line 75: "in genes independent of beta-tubulin" might be better written as "in additional genes other than beta-tubulin".

Introduction --

Lines 99-100: "Using the cycle of discovery" might be better written as "Using this cycle of discovery".

Line 105: "populations and research" might be better written as "populations, and research".

Line 106: "independent" should read "independently".

Lines 118-119: Might "and was significantly favored" be better written as "but was significantly favored"?

Results --

Figure 1A: The label on the Y-axis ("TBZ Response") is confusing. Would it be acceptable to relabel it as "TBZ Resistance", which is what I think it really shows?

Line 191: What is an "Eigen significance threshold"? How is it defined? [This question also arises at Line 980 of the Supplementary Figures.]

Figure 2 and Line 229: There is inconsistent labeling of a lower significance threshold; it is labeled with two asterisks ('**') in the figure itself, but apparently with three asterisks ('***') in the figure legend. This inconsistency should be corrected.

Figure 4 and Lines 297-298: A single asterisk ('*') is labeled as being p < 0.05, but there is no explanation given for what four asterisks ('****') mean; this should be corrected.

Figure 5 and Lines 310-311: A single asterisk ('*') is labeled as being p < 0.05, but does not exist anywhere in the figure; the figure does have four asterisks ('****'), but there is no explanation given for what they mean. This should be corrected.

Line 392: "the cytochrome P450" might better read "a cytochrome P450".

Line 393: "independent" should read "independently".

Line 704: "Haemoncus" should read "Haemonchus".

Supplementary Figures --

Line 980: Again, what is an Eigen threshold and how is it defined?

Figure S7 and Lines 1075-1076: There is a significance of one asterisk ('*') shown in the figure, but not defined in the figure legend; this should be defined.

Line 1096: "Figure S9" was corrected but not fully corrected!

Reviewer #3: I have only a few minor comments that need not necessarily be addressed.

• Metabolites. It is surprising that there are not cascading effects of the allele across all metabolites in this pathway. That is, if the allele impacts the concentration of a metabolite upstream, then one would naively expect downstream metabolite concentrations to also be impacted. Also, wouldn't the K267E substitution be predicted to increase, not decrease TBZ-OH abundances? (I may be wrong about that) Anyway, it is suggested that "additional detoxification" mechanisms are likely to be at play, but could it at all be speculated in the discussion what might be going on here?

• Fitness, trade-offs, and cytochrome P450. For me, cytochromes are implicated in the electron transport chain and thus might be expected to have wide-ranging impacts on metabolism. Little did I realize that these proteins are also often implicated in xenobiotic metabolism specifically. While this is mentioned in the introduction, I think fleshing this out a little bit more in the discussion may be warranted. Mainly because, without this context, the lack of fitness trade-offs connected to this allele remain unexplained. That is, if CYP-35D1 were expected to be pleiotropic, one might expect the lysine allele to be at a disadvantage in the absence of thiabendazole. Along the same lines-- how many CYP proteins are present in the C. elegans genome? If there is a lot of copy number variation, then the opportunity for redundancy and neofunctionalization is high, which would also help to explain the apparent lack of a trade-off here. And an additional minor point, I was surprised that so few Caenorhabditis species were included in the phylogenetic analysis of CYP-35D1 in Figure 7 as there are many genomes now available (maybe there are species out there with the 267 lysine?). Alternatively, I might have missed that this gene only has single-copy orthologs in the reported species; in which case, a larger gene family tree might better contextualize this result.

• Data and code availability. While it is claimed that the data and code have been made available (https://github.com/AndersenLab/2023_cyp35d1_TBZmanuscript), this link leads to a 404 error message. I also did not find any NCBI accession/bioproject numbers associated with this work. I do appreciate the extensive sharing of data in the supplemental materials.

• Figure 1A. This figure might be clearer if, in the legend or the figure itself, it is noted that body length is being used as the proxy for "response" depicted here.

• Line 158. The Andersen et al. 2015 paper should be cited here to clarify that these RILs were previously constructed.

• Lines 473-480. Were the guide RNA sequences reported in these cited papers? Or, I may have missed these somewhere.

Thanks for sharing this work!

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

 [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] Figure resubmission: While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions. Reproducibility: To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

James J Collins III, Adler R Dillman

29 Dec 2024

Dear Dr. Andersen,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Naturally occurring variation in a cytochrome P450 modifies thiabendazole responses independently of beta-tubulin' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Adler R. Dillman, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

James Collins III

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Thank you for your detailed response to reviewers. It was clear that all reviewers appreciated the importance of this work, but they also offered salient concerns about some details of the first submission. The revised manuscript is a significant improvement.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

James J Collins III, Adler R Dillman

7 Jan 2025

Dear Dr. Andersen,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Naturally occurring variation in a cytochrome P450 modifies thiabendazole responses independently of beta-tubulin," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Strains used in the manuscript.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s001.tsv (7.9KB, tsv)
    S2 File. Processed phenotype data from GWAS.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s002.tsv (16.6KB, tsv)
    S3 File. Processed mapping data from GWAS.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s003.tsv (3.5MB, tsv)
    S4 File. Processed linkage mapping data.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s004.tsv (2.7MB, tsv)
    S5 File. Processed ben-1 regressed phenotype data from GWAS.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s005.tsv (13.9KB, tsv)
    S6 File. Processed ben-1 mapping data from GWAS.

    (TSV)

    S7 File. Processed data for peak marker in GWAS and linkage mapping experiments.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s007.tsv (2.2MB, tsv)
    S8 File. Fine mapping data for the peak marker on chromosome V.

    (ZIP)

    ppat.1012602.s008.zip (2.2MB, zip)
    S9 File. Processed HTA data for cyp-35D1 deletions and K267D mutants.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s009.csv (1.4MB, csv)
    S10 File. Processed HTA data for cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 deletion comparisons.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s010.csv (1.3MB, csv)
    S11 File. Processed HTA data for NILs and allele swap strains.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s011.csv (1.1MB, csv)
    S12 File. Processed allele frequency data for competition assays.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s012.csv (14.1KB, csv)
    S13 File. Processed relative fitness data for competition assays.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s013.csv (1.5KB, csv)
    S14 File. Processed metabolomics data.

    (XLSX)

    ppat.1012602.s014.xlsx (113.7KB, xlsx)
    S15 File. Processed yeast metabolomics data.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s015.csv (1.7KB, csv)
    S16 File. Details of H. contortus populations and full results of amplicon sequencing.

    (XLSX)

    ppat.1012602.s016.xlsx (43.5KB, xlsx)
    S17 File. Tajima’s D values around the nhr-176 cyp-35D1 locus.

    (CSV)

    ppat.1012602.s017.csv (1.7MB, csv)
    S18 File. Oligonucleotide sequences used in the manuscript.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s018.tsv (2.5KB, tsv)
    S19 File. Sequence accession information for all sequences used in analyses.

    (TSV)

    ppat.1012602.s019.tsv (434B, tsv)
    S1 Fig. Regression of ben-1 variation emphasizes a prominent QTL on chromosome V.

    (A) Distribution of normalized TBZ response after regression using ben-1 variation as a covariate is shown ordered from most susceptible to most resistant. The N2 and CB4856 strains are colored orange and blue, respectively. Strains with variation in ben-1 have a red triangle at the base of the bar for that strain. (B) Genome-wide association mapping results for animal length following ben-1 regression are shown. The genomic position is shown on the x-axis, and -log10(p) values are shown on the y-axis for each SNV. SNVs are colored pink if they pass the Eigen threshold (dashed horizontal line) or red if they pass the Bonferroni significance threshold (horizontal line).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s020.tif (432.9KB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Phenotype by genotype plots for peak marker in genome-wide association mapping and linkage mapping confirm greater susceptibility in CB4856.

    (A) Regressed animal length (mean.TOF) values in response to TBZ treatment in a genome-wide association study are shown on the y-axis. The x-axis denotes if a strain has the lysine (REF) or glutamate (ALT) alleles at the peak marker. Each point represents a strain’s normalized response from multiple replicates. (B) For the QTL discovered in the linkage mapping experiment, the regressed animal length (mean.TOF) is shown on the y-axis, and the allele of the tested recombinant strain is shown on the x-axis. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s021.tif (125KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. NILs confirm region on chromosome V underlies TBZ response.

    The strain tested is shown on the y-axis. (A) Chromosome V of each strain with the genotype at markers across chromosome V is shown. The x-axis shows the genomic position across the chromosome. A red line denotes the location of the QTL on chromosome V. The genomic background of the cyp-35D1 locus is shown orange for N2 and blue for CB4856. (C) Regressed animal length (mean.TOF) in response to TBZ treatment is shown on the x-axis. The ECA238 strain is a near-isogenic line in the N2 genetic background with a small introgression of the CB4856 genome around the identified chromosome V QTL from linkage mapping. The ECA239 strain is a near-isogenic line in the CB4856 background with a small introgression of the N2 genome around the identified QTL from linkage mapping. Data are shown as Tukey box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown to the right (p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s022.tif (125.4KB, tif)
    S4 Fig. Fine mapping of the QTL region indicates that cyp-35D1 is correlated with response to TBZ in non-ben-1 regressed data and more so after regression.

    Fine mapping of the QTL region on chromosome V is displayed for (A) non-ben-1-regressed data. Each gray bar represents a gene in the region of interest. Red bars indicate high-impact variants in the region, black arrows indicate the direction of gene transcription, and the association between TBZ response and the variant is shown on the y-axis. The location of cyp-35D1 is shown with a label and an arrow pointing to the gene and variant location

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s023.tif (182.7KB, tif)
    S5 Fig. Deletion of cyp-35D1 confers greater levels of susceptibility than E267, and deletion of nhr-176 confers even greater levels of susceptibility.

    The strain cyp-35D1 genotype (top) and nhr-176 genotype (bottom) are shown on the x-axis, with WT representing the wild type for each gene. N2 (orange) and CB4856 (blue) are shown with comparisons to strains within the same genetic background. Data from both independent edits for each edit are shown. Regressed median animal length values of response to TBZ are shown on the y-axis Each point represents a well that contains ~30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown above each strain (p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s024.tif (229.8KB, tif)
    S6 Fig. Deletion of cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 confers susceptibility equivalent to deletion of nhr-176 alone.

    The strain cyp-35D1 genotype (top) and nhr-176 genotype (bottom) are shown on the x-axis with WT representing the wild type for each gene. N2 (orange) and CB4856 (blue) are shown for comparisons with genetic backgrounds. Regressed median animal length values of response to TBZ are shown on the y-axis Each point represents a well that contains ~30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown above each strain (p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s025.tif (153.7KB, tif)
    S7 Fig. Amino acid substitution at codon 267 of cyp-35D1 confers increased susceptibility to TBZ in CRISPR-Cas9 edited strains.

    The strain name is displayed on the y-axis. (A) The genomic background of the tested strain is shown as orange or blue for N2 and blue CB4856, respectively. The CYP-35D1 allele for the strain tested is shown as orange for K267 and blue for E267. (C) Regressed animal length (mean.TOF) values of response to TBZ are shown on the x-axis. Each point represents a well that contains hundreds of animals following 96 hours of TBZ treatment. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The left and right whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 25th and 75th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in comparison to the genomic background strain is shown to the right of each strain; N2 and CB4856 are also significantly different (p<0.05 = *, p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s026.tif (153.6KB, tif)
    S8 Fig. Response of alleles at position 267 indicates that animals with aspartate are the most susceptible, followed by glutamate.

    Regressed mean animal length values of responses to TBZ, both non-regressed by ben-1 (A) and regressed by ben-1 (B), are shown on the y-axis. Each point represents the regressed mean animal length value from hundreds of animals in a single well. The x-axis shows the CYP-35D1 allele. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid horizontal line, the top and bottom of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The top and bottom whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s027.tif (157.2KB, tif)
    S9 Fig. Aspartate substitution as position 267 does not confer susceptibility.

    The strain name is displayed on the y-axis. Two independent edits for each allele change are shown. (A) The genomic background of the tested strain is shown as orange or cadet-blue for N2 and DL238, respectively. Alleles of CYP-35D1 are shown in the same color as the relevant parental genotype, and strains with an N2 background but with the glutamate allele are shown in blue. (B) Regressed median animal length values of response to TBZ are shown on the x-axis Each point represents a well that contains ~30 animals after 48 hours of exposure to TBZ. Data are shown as box plots with the median as a solid vertical line, the right and left of the box representing the 75th and 25th quartiles, respectively. The left and right whiskers are extended to the maximum point that is within 1.5 interquartile range from the 25th and 75th quartiles, respectively. Statistical significance in com parison to the genomic background strain is shown above each strain (p > 0.05 = ns, p <0.01 = **, p < 0.0001 = ****, Tukey HSD).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s028.tif (153.3KB, tif)
    S10 Fig. The abundances of TBZ and TBZ metabolites in the endo-metabolomes two and six hours after exposure.

    The change in the abundances of TBZ (A) and three metabolites: TBZ-OH (B), TBZ-O-glucoside (C), and TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside (D) are shown, with samples taken at two and six hours after exposure to 50 μM TBZ. CYP-35D1 alleles are shown on the x-axis with K267 (orange) and K267E (light gray) in the N2 genetic background, and E267 (blue) and E267K (dark gray) in the CB4856 genetic background. Abundances are shown as the log of abundance after normalization for the abundance of ascr#2. The line represents the mean abundance, and each point represents an individual replicate. Statistical significance between strains with the same genetic background at the same time point is shown (p > 0.05 = ns, p < 0.05 = *, p < 0.0001 = ****, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with Bonferroni correction t-test of Independent Replicates).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s029.tif (283.3KB, tif)
    S11 Fig. The abundances of TBZ and TBZ metabolites in the exo-metabolomes two and six hours after exposure.

    The change in the abundances of TBZ (A) and three metabolites: TBZ-OH (B), TBZ-O-glucoside (C), and TBZ-O-phosphoglucoside (D) are shown, with samples taken at two and six hours after exposure to 50 μM TBZ. CYP-35D1 alleles are shown on the x-axis with K267 (orange) and K267E (light gray) in the N2 genetic background, and E267 (blue) and E267K (dark gray) in the CB4856 genetic background. Abundances are shown as the log of abundance after normalization for the abundance of ascr#2. The line represents the mean abundance, and each point represents an individual replicate. Statistical significance between strains with the same genetic background at the same time point is shown (p > 0.05 = ns, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with Bonferroni correction t-test of Independent Replicates).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s030.tif (270KB, tif)
    S12 Fig. Tajima’s D around cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 locus.

    The divergence measured by Tajima’s D surrounds the cyp-35D1 and nhr-176 locus on chromosome V. The most recent CaeNDR variant release was used to calculate Tajima’s D in this region [31,58].

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012602.s031.tif (81.1KB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2024TBZ_Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    ppat.1012602.s032.docx (32KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Scripts and data for this study are available at https://github.com/AndersenLab/2024_cyp35D1_TBZ_manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES