Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2025 Feb 4;252:9–24. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.252.135155

Liliumhuanglongense (Liliaceae): a newly-discovered species in north-western Sichuan, China

Ting Wang 1,2, Yumei Yuan 1,2, Ting-Hong Zhou 3, Yundong Gao 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC11815331  PMID: 39944841

Abstract

In this study, we describe Liliumhuanglongense, a newly-discovered lily species identified following extensive surveys in an undeveloped area of the Huanglong National Nature Reserve in Sichuan, China. This region, located in the Hengduan Mountains of south-western China, is recognised as one of the world’s prominent biodiversity hotspots, providing diverse habitats for a wide range of plant species. Morphologically, L.huanglongense resembles Liliumfargesii Franch., which is distributed in central China, as well as other tepal-recurved members of the section Lophophora (Bureau & Franch.) F. T. Wang & Ts. Tang. This section comprises dwarf lilies predominantly found in the alpine scrub of the Hengduan Mountains, extending westwards into the Himalayas. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using both nuclear ITS and chloroplast genomes confirm the independent status of the new species and its placement within the section Lophophora. The identification of this new species helps to fill the distribution gap between broad-leaved forest and alpine scrub species within the section, thereby enhancing our understanding of the diversity and distribution history of Lophophora.

Key words: Liliaceae, Liliumhuanglongense , Lophophorum-clade, new species, section Lophophora

Introduction

Lilium, a genus in the tribe Lilieae of the family Liliaceae, comprises herbaceous, bulbous plants with scaled bulbs, dorsifixed anthers and loculicidal capsules (Peruzzi 2016). With approximately 123 recognised species (POWO 2024), the genus is widely distributed across the Northern Hemisphere in Asia, Europe and North America (Liang and Tamura 2000). China, in particular, hosts approximately 55 distinct species according to the latest flora records (Liang 1995; Liang and Tamura 2000), with key distribution areas including northeast, central and south-western China. Amongst these regions, south-western China stands out as a hotspot for the diversity of wild lilies due to its mountainous environment (Gao et al. 2013b, 2015). These mountain ranges and deep valleys constitute an intricate topography, which provides unique habitats for various species.

The Daba Mountains and the Qinling Mountains of central China, as well as the Hengduan Mountains and the Himalayas, form a series of mountain ranges from central to western China, together harbouring the greatest number of lilies in the world (Yundong Gao, unpublished data). Furthermore, the rugged terrain and sparse population in mountainous regions have constrained previous explorations, indicating the potential presence of undiscovered species in these areas. Investigating plant groups within these continuous mountain ranges would enhance our understanding of species diversification and dispersal history amongst the selected plant species, thereby contributing significantly to our overall knowledge of biodiversity.

Our prior investigation elucidated the taxonomic classification of the genus Lilium (Gao et al. 2012, 2013b, 2015; Gao and Gao 2016; Yuan and Gao 2024). Specifically, the Lophophorum-clade sensuGao et al. (2013b) was identified, which comprises both the campanulate-flowered L.oxypetalum Baker, L.lophophorum (Bureau & Franch.) Franch., L.nanum Klotzsch, as well as the tepal-recurved L.fargesii Franch., L.stewartianum Balf. f. & W.W. Sm. and L.matangense J.M. Xu that span mountainous regions from central China (broad-leaved forests) to the Himalayas (alpine scrub and meadows). This clade is analogous to the subgeneric section Lophophora (Bureau & Franch.) F. T. Wang & Ts. Tang, as refined by Watanabe et al. (2021) in their recent work. Most members of this clade, which exhibit recurved perianths, have a limited and sporadic distribution. For example, L.fargesii exhibits a notable widespread distribution at mid-elevation areas (second step) in China (mainly in Qinling and Daba Mountains), while L.matangense is found further westwards at higher altitudes of over 3000 m, with narrow distribution and very small population sizes and therefore is of conservation value. Additionally, L.stewartianum is distributed at an altitude of about 3500 m in the southern Hengduan Mountains (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Morphological characteristics and geographic distribution of Liliumhuanglongense and related species. Liliumhuanglongense fills the geographic gap west of the Qinling Mountains and at the confluence of the Hengduan Mountains.

With advancements in molecular phylogenetics, the monophyly of the Lophophorum-clade has been confirmed (Gao et al. 2013b; Watanabe et al. 2021); however, our understanding of its composition and evolutionary history remains incomplete. Moreover, the distribution of the entire Lophophorum-clade is disjunctive (Fig. 1), particularly between the northern Hengduan Mountains and the western Qinling Mountains, creating a “gap” where members of this clade have not been previously documented. This relic distribution pattern may suggest the presence of additional undiscovered taxa or those that are already extinct. In recent years, meticulous sampling and analysis of this group have yielded several novel findings. This paper highlights one such discovery: the putative new species L.huanglongense, identified by rangers in the Huanglong National Nature Reserve. This discovery can be partially attributed to the increased attention that the Chinese government has directed towards nature reserves and it represents a significant advancement in our understanding of this clade.

Currently, we aim to clarify the status and phylogenetic position of the putative new species by comparing its morphology with that of the most morphologically similar species, in addition to conducting molecular phylogenetic analyses utilising both nuclear markers and chloroplast genomes. Furthermore, the analysis of the morphological and genetic distinctiveness of L.huanglongense is expected to offer additional insights into the Lophophorum-clade by addressing the geographic distribution gap observed amongst its members.

Materials and methods

Field sampling

Leaf materials of the new species were collected from the Huanglong National Nature Reserve and temporarily preserved in silica gel for DNA extraction. During fieldwork, we captured many photographs of the individuals and collected three complete specimens for conservation purposes. These images and specimens were used for subsequent measurements and descriptions. The voucher specimens have been deposited in the Herbarium of the Chengdu Institute of Biology (CDBI).

Morphological analysis

This study is grounded in an analysis of herbarium specimens, digital specimen images, field observations and relevant literature. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of pertinent taxa using online databases such as Tropicos (https://tropicos.org/) and the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL, https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/), focusing on Liliumoxypetalum Baker (Baker 1874), L.lophophorum (Bureau & Franch.) Franch. (Franchet 1898), L.nanum Klotzsch (Klotzsch and Garcke 1862), L.fargesii Franch. (Franchet 1892), L.stewartianum Balf. f. & W.W. Sm. (Smith 1923) and L.matangense J.M. Xu (Xu 1985).

Specimens were meticulously examined through visits to the CDBI, IBSC, KUN, PE, SZ and WUK Herbaria (acronyms according to Thiers (2024), same below) and by accessing digital images from virtual herbarium platforms, including the China Virtual Herbarium (https://www.cvh.ac.cn/), the Kew Herbarium Catalogue (http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/gotoHomePage.do) and JSTOR Global Plants (https://plants.jstor.org/), as well as online images from herbaria B, E, GH, K and P. This approach aimed to facilitate a comparative analysis of morphological characters based on a substantial number of specimens. Morphological traits were selected, based on taxonomically significant features detailed in the “Flora of China” (Liang and Tamura 2000), including bulbs, stems, leaves and flowers. Specifically, the new species was morphologically compared to the tepal-recurved members of the Lophophorum-clade, namely L.fargesii, L.stewartianum and L.matangense. For comparative analysis, the dimensions of the bulbs, stems, leaves and floral organs were measured from both specimen images and photographs of fresh plants, utilising MATO (Liu et al. 2023) and PS software (Suppl. material 1: table S1). The Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occupancy (AOO) were calculated using the GeoCAT software (Bachman et al. 2011).

Molecular phylogeny inference

Genomic DNA was extracted from silica-gel dried leaves using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Allen et al. 2006). Paired-end sequencing libraries were then constructed with insert sizes of approximately 350 bp, followed by sequencing on the DNBSEQ-T7 platform (Beijing Genomics Institute, BGI), with the depth of about 0.1 ~ 0.2 × (10G pair ending reads). About 13 Gb of raw data were filtered by fastp v.0.23.2 (Chen et al. 2018). The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2) and chloroplast genome of new species were then assembled using GetOrganelle v.1.7.6.1 (Jin et al. 2020) with default parameters. Chloroplast genomes were annotated and manual corrections were made using Geneious Prime v.2023.1.2 (Biomatters Ltd. Auckland, New Zealand), based on the plastome of Liliumfargesii (NC_033908.1).

To deduce the phylogenetic position of the putative new species, we combined newly-generated DNA sequences and published sequences, including thirty-two ITS and twenty-eight cp genome from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), to infer phylogenetic relationships, selecting the entire Lophophorum-clade species and 2–3 representative from closely-related clades (Suppl. material 1: table S2) based on previous studies (Gao et al. 2013a; Yuan and Gao 2024). Outgroups included four species of Fritillaria and Cardiocrinum (Suppl. material 1: table S2).

We utilised the online platform (https://ngphylogeny.fr/, Lemoine et al. (2019)) to construct Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees based on complete plastid sequences. The sequences were analysed through the Advanced Workflow, employing the PhyML + SMS/OneClick method. Detailed workflows for MAFFT, BMGE and PhyML + SMS (Maximum Likelihood-Based Phylogenetic Tree Inference with Intelligent Model Selection) are provided in the Methods section of Lemoine et al. (2019). Bootstrap analysis (FBP + TBE) was conducted with 1000 replicates, while all other parameters were kept at their default settings. ITS sequences were processed using PhyloSuite v.1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020). A total of 34 sequences were aligned in batches with MAFFT v.7.313 (Katoh and Standley 2013) using the ‘--auto’ strategy in normal alignment mode. The resultant files were subjected to additional manual corrections using MEGA v.11.0 (Tamura et al. 2021). Subsequent analyses were performed in PhyloSuite, where ambiguous sites and gaps were removed using Gblocks (Talavera and Castresana 2007). The sequences were then concatenated into a single alignment and converted into Nexus format files.

ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) was used for the selection of the most appropriate evolutionary model. Based on the Akaike Information Criterion, GTR + F + G4 was chosen as the optimal model of nucleotide evolution. Bayesian phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) under partition model (2 parallel runs, 10,000,000 generations), in which the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in. The construction of the ITS Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree was performed using PhyloSuite, with the sequence file generated through MAFFT and Gblocks. The file was then processed using the A La Carte option on the online tree-building platform to execute the PhyML analysis. Bootstrap analysis was conducted with 1000 replicates and all other parameters were set to their default values. The generated Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) (Suppl. material 2) phylogenetic trees were visualised using iTOL v.6 (https://itol.embl.de, Letunic and Bork (2024)).

Results

Morphology comparison (Figs 2–4, Table 1)

Liliumhuanglongense shares with L.lophophorum a pair of marginal ridges along the central groove on the adaxial surface of tepals (Fig. 2B), which has been recognised as the most important character defining this section (Watanabe et al. 2021). This feature also provides morphological evidence supporting the new species’ placement within the Lophophorum-clade. Additionally, the turk’s-cap perigone suggests that L.huanglongense is more closely related to tepal-recurved species such as L.fargesii.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Comparison of floral structures of similar species ALiliumhuanglongense flower B tepals of Liliumhuanglongense with basal nectaries CLiliummatangense flower DLiliumfargesii flower ELiliumstewartianum flower F tepals of Liliummatangense with basal nectaries G tepals of Liliumfargesii with basal nectaries H tepals of Liliumstewartianum with basal nectaries. Photographed by Yundong Gao.

While L.huanglongense shares reflexed perianth segments with L.fargesii, L.stewartianum and L.matangense, it differs notably in terms of floral organs. Firstly, the flower of the new species is about 3–4 cm in diameter and, when fully expanded, the perianth is nearly in the same plane as the androgynophore (Fig. 2A), whereas in the other species, the androgynophore is exposed to a greater extent (Fig. 2C–E). Secondly, the stigma of L.huanglongense is three-lobed without inflation (Fig. 3F, G), whereas that of L.matangense is three-lobed with inflation (Fig. 2C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Liliumhuanglongense T.Wang & Y.D.Gao, sp. nov. A habit B dissected flower C outer perianth segment D inner perianth segment E stamen F pistil (frontal view) G pistil (lateral view). Drawn by T. Wang from the holotype.

Furthermore, L.huanglongense possesses a greater number of basal leaves compared to L.fargesii (Fig. 4C, D). The detailed differences between L.huanglongense and the most similar species are listed in Table 1. These morphological differences effectively distinguish the new species from known congeners.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Habitat of Liliumhuanglongense and morphological comparison with LiliumfargesiiA habitat destroyed by mudslides B flowering plant C habit of Liliumhuanglongense exhibiting a greater abundance of basal leaves, accompanied by wider leaf blades compared to L.fargesiiD habit of Liliumfargesii. Liliumhuanglongense. Photographs were taken by multiple authors of present work.

Table 1.

Morphological comparisons of Liliumhuanglongense, L.fargesii, L.stewartianum, and L.matangense.

Characters L.huanglongense L.fargesii L.stewartianum L.matangense
Bulb colour yellow white yellow white
diam. 1.2–1.5 cm approximately 1.5 cm approximately 2.0 cm 1.0–1.5 cm
Stem length 15–40 cm 20–70 cm 20–50 cm. 23–35 cm
Leaves 5–12 × 0.3–0.7 cm 10–14 × 0.2–0.5 cm 2.5–7 × 0.3–0.4 cm 2–2.5 × 0.5–1 cm
Flower basal colour yellow green, pink greenish to deep yellow white
tube length shorter shorter longer shorter
stigma three-lobed without inflation three-lobed without inflation three-lobed with inflation three-lobed with inflation
nectar glands nectaries with cristate projections on both surfaces nectaries with cristate projections on both surfaces papillose nectaries that form two ridges along the bases of the inner tepals inner ones with fimbriate projections on both surfaces of nectaries
Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 5)

The analysis was based on molecular data, specifically ITS (ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2) sequences and the complete chloroplast genome. This study utilised two datasets, each including two individuals of the new species. The new species has an ITS sequences with 624 base pairs (bp) in length with a GC content of 61.5%, whereas the chloroplast genome was 152,597 bp long with a GC content of 37.0%. The chloroplast genome comprises double-stranded circular DNA and exhibits a characteristic quadripartite structure, including a large single-copy (LSC) region spanning 81,965 bp, a small single-copy (SSC) region of 17,496 bp and two inverted repeat (IR) regions, each measuring 26,568 bp. We utilised 34 ITS sequences, with lengths ranging from 610 bp to 633 bp prior to alignment and, after alignment correction, the sequence lengths were 641 bp with 223 variable sites and 411 conserved sites. In addition, we analysed 30 complete chloroplast genomes with sequence lengths ranging from 151,655 bp to 153,235 bp before alignment and 157,060 bp after alignment correction, containing 6,417 variable sites and 148,565 conserved sites.

The phylogenetic analysis indicates that the Lophophorum-clade is monophyletic, supported by both chloroplast and ITS phylogenies, with support values of 100% (Fig. 5A) and 91%/0.99 (Fig. 5B, Suppl. material 2), respectively. These results are consistent with previous works (Gao et al. 2013a; Yuan and Gao 2024). In the plastid phylogeny, L.fargesii is resolved as sister to all other species within the Lophophorum-clade. Within this successively branching clade, both individuals of L.huanglongense form a monophyletic group, which is sister to L.nanum, L.lophophorum, L.matangense and L.stewartianum. In the ITS phylogeny, L.huanglongense is sister to L.stewartianum, whereas in the plastid phylogeny, L.stewartianum forms a clade with L.matangense (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis of selected species of Lilium based on A complete plastome DNA and B nuclear ITS sequence. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap percentages (BS) for ML. In B, the values to the left of the “/” represent the bootstrap support (BS), while those to the right indicate the Bayesian posterior probability (PP).

Taxonomic treatment

. Lilium huanglongense

T.Wang & Y.D.Gao sp. nov.

6EC5D120-AE0F-5174-BFE0-D091DE594AD5

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77356314-1

Figs 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , Table 1 , Suppl. material 1: table S1

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Type Specimens of Liliumhuanglongense T.Wang & Y.D.Gao, sp. nov. A holotype CDBI0285062 B type CDBI0285063 C type CDBI0285064.

Type.

China • Sichuan: Songpan County, Huanglong National Natural Reserve, 30 June 2023, Y.D. Gao GYD2023001 (holotype: CDBI 0285062) (Fig. 6).

Diagnosis.

Liliumhuanglongense is most similar to L.fargesii and L.stewartianum, but can be distinguished from L.fargesii by its yellow tepals and stamens that are longer than the pistil and, in contrast to L.stewartianum, L.huanglongense lacks a deep, slender floral tubes (the height of the cone formed by the connivent tepals) and has a trilobed, non-inflated stigma. (Table 1, Suppl. material 1: table S1)

Description.

Bulb ca. 1.2–1.5 cm in diam., ovoid; scales 1.5–3 × ca. 8 mm, lanceolate, yellow. Stem 15–40 cm long, smooth, basal part red, red colour gradually fading and becoming green with reddish-brown speckles towards the apex of stem. Leaves 5.0–12.0 × 0.3–0.7 cm, scattered, mostly in middle and distal parts of stem, linear, margin recurved, smooth. Flowers actinomorphic, solitary, ca. 4–5 cm in diameter, nodding, Tepals 3.0–3.5 × 0.7–1.0 cm, lanceolate, margin revolute, yellow, with scattered, purple or purplish-brown spots mainly concentrated in the basal part; inner tepal nectaries with cristate projections on both surfaces, green; outer ones glabrous, with a green glistening nectarial channel at the base. Filaments 2–2.5 cm, glabrous; anthers 7–9 × ca. 2 mm, narrowly oblong, brown. Ovary 0.8–1 × ca. 0.3 cm, cylindrical. Style 0.8–1.2 cm, shorter than filaments, three-lobed without inflation, curved upwards. Capsule ca. 2 × 1.5 cm, oblong.

Phenology.

Flowering from June to July.

Habitat and distribution.

Occurring in alpine meadows on limestone slopes near streams, at altitudes of 3000–3300 m. This species is only known from three locations (one destroyed) in Huanglong National Nature Reserve, Songpan, NW Sichuan.

Etymology.

The epithet adopted here is derived from Huanglong National Natural Reserve, the site of discovery of this species.

Conservation status and IUCN preliminary assessment.

We conducted surveys in collaboration with staff from the Huanglong National Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province, China, covering approximately 150 km2. The species L.huanglongense was found at only three locations. The Extent of Occurrence (EOO) for this species was calculated to be approximately 5.361 km2, while its Area of Occupancy (AOO) was estimated at around 0.509 km2. During our field surveys, we observed that the species’ habitat is highly unstable due to annual summer floods and rockfalls. In the summer of 2023, one of the previously known sites was completely destroyed by a mudslide, resulting in the loss of all individuals at that location (Fig. 4A). At the remaining two locations, we recorded approximately 30 mature individuals in total each year. Given the limited distribution, small population size and the instability of its habitat, we propose that L.huanglongense be classified as Critically Endangered (CR, B1i+ii, C1) according to IUCN Red List Criteria (IUCN 2024).

Discussion

Previously, we documented the presence of two distinct flower morphologies within the Lophophorum-clade, which may reflect parallel evolution as lilies rapidly adapt to diverse environments (Gao et al. 2015; Yuan and Gao 2024). This suggests that the former classification of Lilium into subgenera, based solely on floral morphological differences, may not be entirely valid (Watanabe et al. 2021). The Lophophorum-clade further supports the notion that parallel evolution is prevalent within the genus Lilium (Gao et al. 2015; Yuan and Gao 2024). Consequently, caution is warranted when assessing subgeneric affinities, based exclusively on morphological characteristics in this genus.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that Liliumhuanglongense occupies a distinct position within the Lophophorum-clade. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree, based on chloroplast data, shows L.huanglongense as sister to L.nanum, L.lophophorum, L.matangense and L.stewartianum (Fig. 5A). In contrast, both the ML and Bayesian Inference (BI) trees, based on ITS data, place L.huanglongense and L.stewartianum in a monophyletic group (Fig. 5B), revealing a discordance between nuclear and plastid phylogenies (Fig. 5). This discrepancy may result from incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and introgression. However, our previous studies suggest that plastid phylogeny better reflects the geographic relationships amongst species, with introgression being a more plausible explanation (Gao et al. 2013b, 2015).

Within the plastid genome tree, Liliumfargesii occupies the earliest diverging position within the Lophophorum clade-clade (Fig. 5A). The emergence of L.huanglongense may have occurred during times of environmental fluctuation, such as the Quaternary Ice Age, followed by subsequent environmental isolation from its potential ancestral species during interglacial periods (Davis et al. 2005). This aligns with the observed distribution pattern, indicating that L.huanglongense is confined to a unique geographic position within the entire clade (Fig. 1), similar to other tepal-recurved members (e.g. L.matangense, L.stewartianum, Fig. 1) that are sporadically distributed in the Hengduan Mountains region. The limited population size and few populations of these tepal-recurved members of the Lophophorum clade clade suggest that a widely-distributed common ancestor may have existed previously, with the current relic pattern resulting from long-term isolation.

Morphologically, Liliumhuanglongense is characterised by its compact stature, pale yellow perianth (Fig. 2A), flattened and delicate floral structure and dense basal foliage, distinguishing it from morphologically similar species. The pale yellow perianth of L.huanglongense sets it apart from L.matangense (Fig. 2C) and L.fargesii (Fig. 2D), which typically exhibit flowers with perianth colours ranging from white to green. Additionally, its relatively small size and flattened floral structure (short tube length) differentiate it from L.stewartianum (Fig. 2E), which features a deep, slender floral funnel (the height of the cone formed by the connivent tepals). Our comparisons also revealed significant differences in the proportions of floral organs amongst these species. Liliumhuanglongense has flattened floral parts, with the flowers and stamens nearly in the same plane (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the pistils and stamens of similar species, such as L.fargesii, L.stewartianum and L.matangense, clearly protrude from the perianth.

The specialised perigone structure in L.huanglongense is likely the result of localised plant-environment interactions, particularly with its pollinators. These pollinators play a crucial role in driving morphological evolution (Van der Niet and Johnson 2012; Van der Niet et al. 2014) and have influenced the delicate floral features of L.huanglongense, such as its pale yellow perianth and flattened floral structure, which may have evolved to attract specific pollinators in its habitat. Liliumhuanglongense exhibits a shorter style than L.fargesii and a shorter floral tube (the height of the cone formed by the connivent tepals) than L.stewartianum. These differences in floral morphology may have evolved in response to varying pollinators, indicating that pollination syndrome may play a key role in the speciation process of this new species.

Geographically, Liliumhuanglongense bridges the distribution gap between L.fargesii, native to central China and other species inhabiting the south-western alpine mountains (Fig. 1). The entire Lophophorum-clade extends over a broad geographic range from Hunan (L.fargesii) in the east to the western Himalayas (L.nanum) in the west. This distribution encompasses mesic broadleaf forests in the central Daba Mountain system, alpine scrublands in the south-western Hengduan Mountains and extends to the alpine scrub meadows of the Himalayas (Gao et al. 2013b). The divergence of the Lophophorum clade clade is likely due to historical geological and climatic changes in the Qinling-Dabashan-Hengduan-Himalayan region (Gao et al. 2013b; Xing and Ree 2017). This region, characterised by a series of mountain ranges and diverse ecological niches, spans central and south-western China and supports substantial biodiversity.

In conclusion, Liliumhuanglongense is a morphologically and molecularly distinct new species within the Lophophorum-clade. This discovery not only contributes to the diversity of the genus, but also fills a geographical gap west of the Qinling Mountains, at the confluence of the Hengduan Mountains. However, our understanding of the Lophophorum-clade remains incomplete. To enhance our comprehension of its phylogenetic relationships and gain a comprehensive understanding of the biogeographic processes involved, further literature reviews, fieldwork and additional collection of morphological and molecular data are necessary.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Lilium huanglongense

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Professor Xin-Fen Gao and Ms. Qi Yu of Chengdu Institute of Biology, Professor Changqiu Liu of Guangxi Institute of Botany, Dr. Pan Li of Zhejiang University and Mr. Melvyn Herbert for their support with sample collection. We appreciate Xiao-Juan Chen’s assistance with the software and article submission.

Citation

Wang T, Yuan Y, Zhou T-H, Gao Y (2025) Lilium huanglongense (Liliaceae): a newly-discovered species in north-western Sichuan, China. PhytoKeys 252: 9–24. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.252.135155

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 32171605) to Y.D. Gao, as well as the project "Research and Demonstration of Key Technologies for Biodiversity Conservation in the Yellow River Basin of Sichuan Province" (Grant No. 2023YFS0378), and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No. 2023NSFSC0141)

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 32171605) to Yundong Gao, as well as the project "Research and Demonstration of Key Technologies for Biodiversity Conservation in the Yellow River Basin of Sichuan Province" (Grant No. 2023YFS0378) and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2023NSFSC0141).

Author contributions

All authors contributed equally to this study and made a significant contribution to the overall result.

Author ORCIDs

Ting Wang https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2338-7011

Yumei Yuan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4312-5167

Ting-Hong Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-478X

Yundong Gao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-2128

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Supplementary information

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ting Wang, Yumei Yuan, Ting-Hong Zhou, Yundong Gao

Data type

xlsx

Explanation note

table S1. Comparison of measurements and morphology of specimens of Liliumhuanglongense, Liliumstewartianum, Liliumfargesii and Liliummatangense. table S2. GenBank accession numbers for sequences utilised in phylogenetic analyses.

Supplementary material 2

Phylogenetic tree constructed from 34 ITS sequences using Bayesian analysis

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ting Wang, Yumei Yuan, Ting-Hong Zhou, Yundong Gao

Data type

pdf

References

  1. Allen GC, Flores-Vergara MA, Krasynanski S, Kumar S, Thompson WF. (2006) A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nature Protocols 1(5): 2320–2325. 10.1038/nprot.2006.384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachman SP, Moat J, Hill A, de la Torre J, Scott B. (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. 10.3897/zookeys.150.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker JG. (1874) Revisions of the genera and species of Tulipeae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 14(76): 211–310. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1874.tb00314.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith WW. (1923) Notes on Chinese Lilies. Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 28(1–4): 122–160. 10.1080/03746602309469374 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. (2018) fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34(17): i884–i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR. (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86(7): 1704–1714. 10.1890/03-0788 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Franchet AR. (1892) Les lis de la Chine et du Thibet. Journal de Botanique (Morot) 6(18): 304–321. [Google Scholar]
  8. Franchet AR. (1898) Plantarum sinensium ecloge secunda. Journal de Botanique (Morot) 12: 177–196. 10.1080/00378941.1898.10830840 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao YD, Gao XF. (2016) Accommodating Nomocharis in Lilium (Liliaceae). Phytotaxa 277(2): 205–210. 10.11646/phytotaxa.277.2.8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao YD, Hohenegger M, Harris AJ, Zhou SD, He XJ, Wan J. (2012) A new species in the genus Nomocharis Franchet (Liliaceae): Evidence that brings the genus Nomocharis into Lilium. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298(1): 69–85. 10.1007/s00606-011-0524-1 [DOI]
  11. Gao YD, Zhou SD, He XJ. (2013a) Liliumyapingense (Liliaceae), a New Species from Yunnan, China, and its Systematic Significance Relative to Nomocharis. Annales Botanici Fennici 50(3): 187–194. 10.5735/085.050.0311 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao YD, Harris AJ, Zhou SD, He XJ. (2013b) Evolutionary events in Lilium (including Nomocharis, Liliaceae) are temporally correlated with orogenies of the Q–T plateau and the Hengduan Mountains. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68(3): 443–460. 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gao YD, Harris AJ, He XJ. (2015) Morphological and ecological divergence of Lilium and Nomocharis within the Hengduan Mountains and Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau may result from habitat specialization and hybridization. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15(1): 147. 10.1186/s12862-015-0405-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. IUCN (2024) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 16. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [Accessed 20 June 2024]
  15. Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang JB, Song Y, dePamphilis CW, Yi TS, Li DZ. (2020) GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biology 21(1): 241. 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klotzsch F, Garcke A. (1862) Die botanischen ergebnisse der reise Seiner Königl. Hoheit des prinzen Waldemar von Prussen in den jahren 1845 und 1846. Verlag der Königlichen Geheimen oberhofbuchdruckerei (R. Becker), Berlin, 53 pp. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lemoine F, Correia D, Lefort V, Doppelt-Azeroual O, Mareuil F, Cohen-Boulakia S, Gascuel O. (2019) NGPhylogeny. fr: New generation phylogenetic services for non-specialists. Nucleic Acids Research 47(W1): W260–W265. 10.1093/nar/gkz303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Letunic I, Bork P. (2024) Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Research 52(W1): W78–W82. 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Liang SY. (1995) Chorology of Liliaceae (s. str.) and its bearing on the Chinese flora. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 33(1): 27–51. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liang SY, Tamura M. (2000) Lilium L. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH. (Eds) Flora of China Vol.24. Science Press, Beijing; & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 135–159.
  23. Liu L, Wang Q, Zhang Z, He X, Yu Y. (2023) MATO: An updated tool for capturing and analyzing cytotaxonomic and morphological data. The Innovation Life 1(1): 100010. 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peruzzi L. (2016) A new infrafamilial taxonomic setting for Liliaceae, with a key to genera and tribes. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 150: 1341–1347. 10.1080/11263504.2015.1115435 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. POWO (2024) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ [Accessed 20 June 2024]
  26. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Talavera G, Castresana J. (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56(4): 564–577. 10.1080/10635150701472164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. In: Battistuzzi FU (Ed. ) Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thiers B. (2024) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ [Accessed 29 September 2024]
  30. Van der Niet T, Johnson SD. (2012) Phylogenetic evidence for pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(6): 353–361. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Van der Niet T, Peakall R, Johnson SD. (2014) Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: New evidence and future perspectives. Annals of Botany 113(2): 199–212. 10.1093/aob/mct290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Watanabe ST, Hayashi K, Arakawa K, Fuse S, Nagamasu H, Ikeda H, Kuyama A, Suksathan P, Poopath M, Pooma R. (2021) Biosystematic studies on Lilium (Liliaceae) I. Phylogenetic analysis based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences and a revised infrageneric classification. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 72(3): 179–204. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xing Y, Ree RH. (2017) Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(17): E3444–E3451. 10.1073/pnas.1616063114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  34. Xu JM. (1985) New species of Liliaceae from Sichuan. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 23(3): 233–234. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yuan YM, Gao YD. (2024) Liliumliangiae, a new species in the genus Lilium (Liliaceae) that reveals parallel evolution within morphology. Frontiers in Plant Science 15: 1371237. 10.3389/fpls.2024.1371237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT. (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Lilium huanglongense
phytokeys.252.135155-treatment1.xml (25.5KB, xml)
Supplementary material 1

Supplementary information

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ting Wang, Yumei Yuan, Ting-Hong Zhou, Yundong Gao

Data type

xlsx

Explanation note

table S1. Comparison of measurements and morphology of specimens of Liliumhuanglongense, Liliumstewartianum, Liliumfargesii and Liliummatangense. table S2. GenBank accession numbers for sequences utilised in phylogenetic analyses.

phytokeys-252-009_article-135155__-s001.xlsx (23.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary material 2

Phylogenetic tree constructed from 34 ITS sequences using Bayesian analysis

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ting Wang, Yumei Yuan, Ting-Hong Zhou, Yundong Gao

Data type

pdf

phytokeys-252-009_article-135155__-s002.pdf (631.3KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES