Abstract
Objective:
Orangutans (Pongo abelii), as endemic primates of Indonesia, are characterized by a predominantly arboreal lifestyle. Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumonia) and other Gram-negative bacteria are present in the Indigenous flora of many mammals, including orangutans. This study aimed to investigate the antibiotic resistance and virulence profile of K. pneumonia isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans.
Materials and Methods:
This study investigated 10 fecal samples from wild Sumatran orangutans from the Gunung Leuser National Park, Aceh, Indonesia. Biochemical and molecular identification of K. pneumoniae using the RNA polymerase subunit b gene and detection of virulence-associated genes. In addition, molecular detection of antibiotic resistance genes was performed to characterize the resistance mechanisms in the isolates.
Results:
K. pneumonia was detected in 6 out of 10 fecal samples from wild Sumatran orangutans. The virulence genes mrkD and entB were detected in all (100%) of the isolates, whereas wabG was identified in 83.33% of the strains. Antibiotic susceptibility testing against K. pneumoniae revealed that three isolates were susceptible to streptomycin (S) and nalidixic acid (NA), while all six isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. One isolate demonstrated intermediate resistance to NA, while the remaining two exhibited intermediate resistance to S. Six isolates were resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline, and erythromycin, indicating multidrug resistance. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes were detected in the isolates with the following prevalence: blaTEM gene (six isolates; 100%), blaSHV (six isolates; 100%), blaCTX-M gene (four isolates; 66.67%), and tetA gene (four isolates; 66.67%).
Conclusion:
This study revealed the virulence and resistance profile of K. pneumoniae bacterium isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans, which is essential for formulating effective conservation and healthcare strategies.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, K. pneumoniae, multi-drug resistant, virulence factors, wild sumatran orangutans
Introduction
Orangutans are members of the family Hominidae, which includes the giant apes and primates (Pongo spp.). They are one of the few extant giant ape species in Southeast Asia [1–3]. Orangutans have long limbs and reddish or brown hair. Only three species of orangutans are known to occur in Indonesia: Pongo pygmaeus (P. pygmaeus) on the island of Borneo, Pongo abelii, and Pongo tapanuliensis (P. tapanuliensis) on the island of Sumatra [4–6]. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature has listed all three orangutan species as critically endangered due to population declines [7,8]. Orangutans are predominantly arboreal, living in and around trees. In general, Sumatran orangutans generally engage in social, feeding, and resting daily activities. Sumatran orangutans relax by sleeping at night and taking midday naps between activities. Sumatran orangutans typically build their shelters in trees. Orangutans live in semi-solitary communities. Social behaviors commonly observed in orangutans include mother-child interactions and juvenile orangutans engaged in play [9]. Sumatran orangutans primarily feed during the morning and afternoon, engaging in foraging behavior. Orangutans sample and smell their food before consuming it, discarding items that are unpalatable and searching for alternative sources. Although primarily frugivorous, their diet also includes bark, seeds, leaves, vines, flowers, and bark. In addition, orangutans often consume insects for protein [10,11].
The presence of gram-negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), in the normal flora of several mammals [12–14] underscores the possibility of cross-species transmission of infectious agents. Understanding the dynamics of bacterial transmission and antibiotic resistance in wildlife populations is critical, as evidenced by the impact of K. pneumoniae infections on immunocompromised and apparently healthy orangutans. Several virulence factors of K. pneumoniae enable this bacterium to evade the host’s innate immune mechanisms. Capsules, exopolysaccharides associated with mucoviscosity, lipopolysaccharides, adhesins, and iron uptake systems are virulence factors of K. pneumoniae [15–17]. Infection caused by K. pneumoniae is exacerbated by its ability to cause nosocomial infections and its resistance to multiple antibiotics [18,19]. The emergence of antibiotic resistance in K. pneumoniae is a global concern [20–22], and the resistance of this bacterium in orangutan populations suggests the need for careful monitoring of environmental contamination and potential sources of antibiotic exposure.
This study aimed to enlighten the antibiotic resistance and virulence profile of K. pneumoniae isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans. This research has significant implications for the conservation of endangered species, including orangutans. We can strengthen conservation efforts to better address environmental challenges by identifying K. pneumoniae and its antibiotic resistance profile. This, in turn, will facilitate the implementation of strategies that effectively prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance in wildlife populations. As such, this study serves as an important scientific resource and makes a valuable contribution to both animal conservation and the preservation of natural habitats in Indonesia.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
This study received approval and a written letter of recommendation from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry Directorate General of Natural Resources and Ecosystem Conservation (Kementerian Linkugnan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Direktorat Jenderal Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem) Number SK 433/KSDAE/SET.3/KSA.2/8/2021.
Sample collection
Ten fecal samples were collected from adult Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) living in Gunung Leuser National Park, Southeast Aceh Regency, Indonesia. The samples were collected from wild orangutans between 11 and 15 years old. No treatments were administered to these orangutans. Gunung Leuser National Park is located at 903°02’50.5” north latitude and 097°25’02.0” east longitude and covers an area of 281,574.62 hectares. Regarding topography, the regions range from coastal areas (above 0 meters above sea level [MASL]) to alpine areas (up to 3,000 MASL). About 80% of the topography has a more than 40% slope. In this jungle environment, orangutans thrive without human intervention for health management, nutrition, vaccination, or deworming. Their diet consists of fruit harvested and eaten directly from the trees. They live in nesting trees between 15 and 40 m high. The feces of the orangutans that fell from the trees were collected. To avoid environmental contamination, only the central part of the feces of recently defecated orangutans was collected. The samples were placed in plastic bags and transported in a cool box to the laboratory, where the temperature was kept between 2°C and 10°C [9].
Biochemical methods for identification
Samples were cultured on MacConkey agar (MAC) differential selective medium CM0007 (Oxoid, UK) for 24 h at 37°C. Colonies of K. pneumoniae can be identified macroscopically by observing mucoid formation and the ability of the bacteria to ferment lactose. Single colonies were then subcultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA) CM0131 (Oxoid, UK) for purification. Bacterial colonies from the TSA culture were picked, placed on a glass plate, and stained with Gram’s stain for microscopic identification. The 3% potassium hydroxide test was also performed to confirm that the bacteria were Gram-negative. The oxidase test was then carried out by dropping some oxidase reagents. In addition, indole, methyl red, voges-proskauer, and Simmon citrate (indole MB0209, methyl red-Voges-Proskauer CM1092, and Simmon citrate CM0155B), triple sugar iron agar (TSIA) CM0277B, Christensen’s urea agar CM0053, and carbohydrate fermentation tests (Oxoid, UK) were performed for biochemical characterization. K. pneumoniae is positive for the methyl red test, Simmon’s citrate test, urease test, gas and sugar fermentation tests on TSIA, and the glucose, lactose, sucrose, maltose, dulcitol, and mannitol fermentation tests, but negative for the indole, Voges Proskauer, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) tests [23].
DNA extraction and molecular characterization
DNA extraction was performed using the Geneaid Presto™ Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit (Geneaid Biotech Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Identification of putative K. pneumoniae isolates based on biochemical characterization was confirmed by the detection of the RNA polymerase subunit b (rpoB) gene using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The following primers were used to detect the rpoB gene: forward primer 5’-AAC CAG TTC CGC GTT GGC CTG A-3’ and reverse primer 5’-CCT GAA CAA CAC GCT CGG A-3’. The amplicon size was 1090 bp [24,25].
The PCR mix (25 μl/reaction) was composed as follows: 3 µl DNA template, 2 µl forward primers (10 M), 2 µl reverse primers (10 M), 12.5 µl of MytaqTM HS Red Mix (Bioline, UK), and 5.5 µl ddH2O. The PCR was carried out using a GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 thermal cycler (Applied BiosystemsTM, USA) with the following conditions: 4 min at 94°C (predenaturation), 30 sec of denaturation at 94°C, 1 min of annealing at 54°C, and 4 min of extension at 78°C, for 30 cycles. The final extension was carried out at 72°C for 5 min [24]. PCR results were detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (Thermo Fisher Scientific USA).
Detection of virulence-associated genes of K. pneumoniae
Virulence-associated genes of K. pneumoniae were identified using PCR. Primer sequences used to amplify fragments of the targeted virulence factor genes rmpA, magA, mrkD, and entB are shown in Table 1. The amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 54°C–59°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. A final extension was performed at 72°C for 10 min.
Table 1. Primers to detect rpoB, virulence-associated genes, and antimicrobial resistance genes.
| Gene target | Nucleotide sequence (5’-3’) |
Amplicon (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| rpoB | F: 5'-ACCAGTTCCGCGTTGGCCTGG-3' R: 5'-CCTGAACAACACGCTCGGA-3' |
1090 | [25] |
| magA | F: 5'-GGTGCTCTTTACATCATTGC-3' R: 5'-GCAATGGCCATTTGCGTTAG-3' |
1.283 | [26] |
| rmpA | F: 5'-ACTGGGCTACCTCTGCTTCA-3' R: 5'-CTTGCATGAGCCATCTTTCA-3' |
535 | [26] |
| mrkD | F: 5'-CCACCAACTATTCCCTCGAA-3' R: 5'-ATGGAACCCACATCGACATT-3' |
240 | [26] |
| entB | F: 5'-ATTTCCTCAACTTCTGGGGC-3' R: 5'-AGCATCGGTGGCGGTGGTCA-3' |
371 | [26] |
| wabG | F: 5'-CGGACTGGCAGATCCATATC-3' R: 5'-ACCATCGGCCATTTGATAGA-3' |
683 | [27] |
| blaTEM | F: 5'-ATTTCCGTGTCGCCCTTAT-3' R: 5'-CTACGATACGGGAGGGCTTA-3' |
516 | [28] |
| blaSHV | F: 5'-CCTGTTAGCCACCCTGCC-3' R: 5'-CCGCAGATAAATCACCAC-3' |
768 | [28] |
| blaCTX-M | F: 5'-ATGATGAAAAAATCGTTATGC-3' R: 5'-CAGCATCTCCCAGCCTAAT-3' |
866 | [28] |
| tetA | F: 5'-GTA ATT CTG AGC ACT GTC GC-3' R: 5'-CTG CCT GGA CAA CAT TGC TT-3' |
965 | [28] |
| qnrS | F: 5'-ACG ACA TTC GTC AAC TGC AA-3' R: 5'-TAA ATT GGC ACC CTG TAG GC-3' |
417 | [29] |
| ermB | F: 5'-GAAAAGGTACTCAACCAAATA-3' R: 5'- GTAACGGTACTTAAATTGTTTAC-3' |
639 | [30] |
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The antibiotic susceptibility test was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The turbidity level was compared to McFarland standards of 0.5 or 1.5 108 colony forming unit/ml. Suspensions were pipetted using a micropipette and dropped onto Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK). Antibiotic discs of ampicillin (AMP; 10 μg), chloramphenicol (C; 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg), nalidixic acid (NA; 30 μg), tetracycline (TET; 30 μg), erythromycin (E; 15 μg), and streptomycin (S; 10 μg) were used. The isolates were then incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Bacterial susceptibility was determined by measuring the size of the zone of inhibition and interpreting the results according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s 2023 guidelines [31].
Detection of antibiotic resistance genes
Detection of the resistance genes blaSHV, blaTEM, and blaCTXM (AMP); tetA (TET); qnrS (NA and CIP); ermB (E); and aac (3)-IV (S) was performed only in K. pneumoniae isolates that showed phenotypic intermediate susceptibility and resistance. Antibiotic resistance genes were identified by PCR using the primers listed in Table 1.
Results
Bacterial isolation and identification
Six out of ten fecal samples (60%) from wild orangutans in Gunung Leuser National Park were positive for Klebsiella sp. Based on colony morphology and biochemical tests, we identified these isolates as Klebsiella spp. On MAC, the Klebsiella colonies appeared convex, mucoid, and fermented lactose, as indicated by a pink coloration (Fig. 1). The TSIA test characterized Klebsiella spp. as producing acid at the base and slope and did not produce gas or H2S. Positive results in the methyl red test, Simmons citrate test, and urease test were observed. The fermentation of glucose, sucrose, lactose, maltose, dulcitol, and mannitol occurs during the carbohydrate test. The resulting bacteria are indole and Voges-Proskauer negative and nonmotile.
Figure 1. Isolation of Klebsiella bacteria from wild Sumatran orangutan samples. The morphology of Klebsiella genus colonies on MCA are convex, pink, and mucoid.

Putative K. pneumoniae isolates, identified through biochemical characterization, were further confirmed by detecting the rpoB gene, which encodes the RNA polymerase subunit β. All isolates displayed a positive result for the rpoB gene. Positive isolates exhibited a band of 1090 bp, consistent with the results of the molecular identification (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Amplification of the rpoB gene (1090 bp) isolates K. pneumoniae from wild Sumatran orangutans. M: 100 bp DNA marker; 2. ATCC: Positive control, 2–7: Positive isolates of K. pneumoniae.
Virulence-associated genes of K. pneumoniae
This study investigated five virulence-associated genes, namely rmpA, magA, mrkD, entB, and wabG. All isolates detected the mrkD and entB genes, while five isolates (83.33%) detected the wabG gene. None of the isolates had the rmpA or magA genes detected. Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2 present these results.
Figure 3. Amplification of the virulence factor K. Pneumoniae from wild Sumatran orangutans. (A) mrkD gene (240 bp); (B) entB gene (370 bp). M: 100 bp DNA marker; 1–6: Positive isolates.
Figure 4. Amplification of the virulence factors of K. Pneumoniae from wild Sumatran orangutans. (A) rmpA gene (535 bp) and magA gene (1.283 bp). M: 100 bp DNA marker 1–6: Negative isolates; (B) wabG gene (683 bp). 1–6: Positive isolates.
Table 2. Virulence factors profile of K. pneumoniae isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans.
| Isolate | rmpA | magA | mrkD | entB | wabG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OU-1 | − | − | + | + | + |
| OU-3 | − | − | + | + | - |
| OU-5 | − | − | + | + | + |
| OU-7 | − | − | + | + | + |
| OU-9 | − | − | + | + | + |
| OU-10 | − | − | + | + | + |
Description: (+) = positive result, (−) = negative result for the gene which being tested.
Antibiotic resistance genes of K. pneumoniae
The results of antibiotic susceptibility testing of K. pneumoniae isolates showed that all six isolates were susceptible to C and CIP, while three isolates were susceptible to S and NA. Two isolates showed intermediate susceptibility to S, and one isolate showed intermediate susceptibility to NA. All isolates were resistant to AMP, TET, and E; two isolates were resistant to NA, and one isolate was resistant to S (Table 3).
Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of K. pneumoniae isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans.
| Antimicrobial susceptibility for each sample | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics | OU-1 | OU-3 | OU-5 | OU-7 | OU-9 | OU-10 |
| AMP | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| TET | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| CIP | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| NA | I | S | S | S | R | R |
| C | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| E | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Streptomycin | I | I | S | S | S | R |
| MDR | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Description: I = intermediet, R = resistant, S = sensitive.
All isolates in this study exhibited resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics, a characteristic commonly defined as multidrug resistance (MDR). MDR is the resistance of bacteria to three or more groups of antibiotics [32]. In this study, all isolates were MDR. Table 3 shows that there were four isolates: OU-1, OU-3. OU-5 and OU-7 were resistant to three types of antibiotics, one isolate (OU-9) was resistant to four antibiotics, while another isolate (OU-10) was resistant to five types of antibiotics.
Phenotypically resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were subsequently tested for resistance genes. The following resistance genes were detected: blaTEM (6 isolates; 100%), blaSHV (6 isolates; 100%), blaCTX-M gene (4 isolates; 66.67%), tetA gene (4 isolates; 66.67%), qnrS gene (0 isolates; 0%), ermB gene (0 isolates; 0%), and aac(3)-IV (0 isolates; 0%). The results are shown in Figures 5 and 6 and Table 4.
Figure 5. Amplification resistance genes of the blaTEM (516 bp), blaSHV (768 bp) and blaCTXM (866 bp). M: 100 bp DNA marker, 1–6: K. pneumoniae isolates from wild Sumatran orangutans.
Figure 6. Amplification resistance genes of K. pneumonia from wild Sumatran orangutans M: 100 bp DNA marker, (A) tetA gene (965 bp) 1, 3, 4 and 6 Positive isolates; (B) ermB gene (639 bp) 1–6: negative isolates.
Table 4. Profile resistance genes of K. pneumonia isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans.
| Isolate | blaTEM | blaSHV | blaCTX-M | tetA | qnrS | ermB | aac (3)-IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OU-1 | + | + | + | + | X | − | X |
| OU-3 | + | + | + | − | X | − | X |
| OU-5 | + | + | − | + | X | − | X |
| OU-7 | + | + | + | + | X | − | X |
| OU-9 | + | + | − | − | − | − | X |
| OU-10 | + | + | + | + | − | − | − |
Description: (+) = positive result, (−): negative resultfor the gene which being tested, X: test not performed.
Discussion
K. pneumoniae has been identified in the gastrointestinal tract of a wide range of animal species, including orangutans [33,34]. K. pneumoniae, a common gut microbiota member, has the potential to become pathogenic and cause infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals [35,36]. Although data on K. pneumoniae infections in Sumatran orangutans are limited, it is crucial to highlight that infectious diseases, including those caused by K. pneumoniae, pose significant threats to the survival and well-being of these endangered animals. K. pneumoniae infections can potentially cause various diseases in orangutans, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and additional systemic infections. The lack of access to medical intervention and treatment for these infections is particularly problematic in wild orangutan populations. Factors such as human-animal interactions, habitat degradation, and environmental changes can increase stress levels and susceptibility to infections in wildlife, particularly endangered species like the Sumatran orangutan.
The presence of K. pneumoniae isolates from wild Sumatran orangutans, all carrying the mrkD and entB genes, indicates a common genetic trait among these strains. These genes play crucial roles in the pathogenicity and virulence of K. pneumoniae [17,19,37]. The mrkD gene, which is associated with the synthesis of type 3 fimbriae, enhances the adherence of the bacterium to host cells, thereby facilitating the processes of colonization and eventual infection [38]. By enhancing the ability of the bacterium to colonize and infect the host, this adhesion mechanism contributes to its pathogenesis. The detection of the mrkD gene in all strains suggests a possible common virulence mechanism among the strains of K. pneumoniae in the orangutan population.
Similarly, the entB gene is involved in iron acquisition via enterobactin, a siderophore. Iron is a critical nutrient for bacterial growth, and the ability of K. pneumoniae to scavenge iron from the host environment enhances its survival and development [39–41]. The presence of the entB gene in each isolate highlights the critical role of this mechanism in the pathogenicity and persistence of K. pneumoniae in the orangutan gastrointestinal tract.
The presence of the wabG gene in 83.33% of the isolates suggests potential resistance to fosfomycin, a commonly prescribed antibiotic [42]. This finding emphasizes the importance of understanding the antimicrobial resistance profile of these bacterial strains and the need for comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship initiatives to prevent the spread of resistance within wildlife populations. The absence of the rmpA and magA genes in all isolates indicates a unique genetic feature distinguishing these strains from certain strains of hypermucoviscous K. pneumoniae associated with severe human infections [43,44]. The absence of these genes in the K. pneumoniae strains from the Sumatran orangutan population suggests that they have distinct virulence potential. The results of this study improve the understanding of the genetic characteristics and virulence components of K. pneumoniae strains that infect orangutans. As a result, there is now a clearer understanding of the precise mechanisms by which these strains can induce infection and promote pathogenesis.
Antibiotics are frequently derived from natural sources, including specific microorganisms that generate them for defense. For example, E is produced by Streptomyces erythraeus [45,46]. Beta-lactam and TET can also be synthesized by environmental microorganisms. TETs are formed through the fermentation of actinomycetes, and the antibiotic penicillin is naturally produced by Penicillium mold [47,48]. Orangutans may encounter trace amounts of these antibiotic compounds by consuming vegetation, water, or other environmental components harboring antibiotic-producing microorganisms. This exposure has the potential to influence the gut microbiota of orangutans, potentially leading to the emergence of antibiotic resistance within their microbial communities.
Antimicrobial resistance is a global issue affecting various species, including wildlife [49,50]. In orangutans, resistance can arise from various factors, including ingestion of antibiotic compounds present in the environment, overuse and inappropriate use of antibiotics in veterinary and human medicine, and environmental contamination. Human-wildlife interactions potentially also introduce antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria are often linked to inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine and human and animal populations. In addition, environmental factors such as contamination and the release of antibiotics into the environment can contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance in various bacterial strains.
All isolates in this study exhibited resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics, a characteristic commonly defined as MDR. The discovery of MDR isolates in this study underscores the urgent concern about antimicrobial resistance in K. pneumoniae infections in orangutans. MDR strains are a major concern because they are resistant to a wide range of antibiotics, making the treatment of infections caused by these strains much more difficult [51,52]. Particularly for endangered species like orangutans, the presence of MDR isolates in this study highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms underlying antibiotic resistance in wildlife populations. Comprehensive surveillance programs and strategic interventions are urgently needed to manage and reduce the spread of MDR strains in the environment.
A comprehensive strategy would be required to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance and MDR K. pneumoniae in orangutans. This would include advocating the responsible use of antibiotics in animal and human healthcare, establishing efficient waste management systems, and limiting human-wildlife interactions that can facilitate the spread of resistant bacteria. Understanding and addressing the potential impact of antimicrobial resistance on endangered species, such as the Sumatran orangutan, requires vigilant monitoring of wildlife health. Understanding the prevalence and characteristics of MDR isolates in orangutans is critical not only for health management but also for advancing conservation initiatives aimed at protecting these endangered species. This information can serve as a basis for informed decision-making and the formulation of targeted interventions to protect the survival and welfare of orangutans.
As the sample size of wild orangutans in the study was limited, it is important to interpret these findings cautiously and consider the broader context of orangutan populations in their natural habitat. Observations of wild orangutans in various forest habitats reveal diverse behaviors, such as arboreal activity and wide-ranging movement in the forest. The dispersed population of around 30 wild orangutans across hundreds of hectares of forest illustrates the difficulties of conducting in-depth research and monitoring in large and isolated habitats. The challenges include sample collection limitations, operational constraints, and the complications associated with studying animals in their natural, often inaccessible, habitats. Despite these limitations, this study contributes significantly to understanding the prevalence and genetic characteristics of K. pneumoniae within the sampled orangutan population. To assess the broader prevalence and distribution of this bacterium among orangutans in different forest areas and their native habitats, further research is necessary.
Further research and surveillance initiatives should include the potential use of non-invasive sampling methods and advanced genetic analysis. To reduce the likelihood of K. pneumoniae infection in wildlife populations, including Sumatran orangutans, it is imperative to prioritize habitat conservation and protection, establish disease surveillance initiatives, and advocate for responsible tourism and human-wildlife interaction protocols. A comprehensive understanding of the prevalence, transmission dynamics, virulence factors, and resistance of K. pneumoniae in orangutans is essential to formulating effective health and conservation strategies. Enforcement of environmental management practices, responsible antibiotic use, and comprehensive surveillance are imperative to prevent the spread of infection and the emergence of antibiotic resistance in orangutans and other wildlife populations. To ensure the conservation and welfare of Sumatran orangutans and their ecosystems, conservation organizations, local communities, researchers, and government agencies must work together to improve our understanding of disease dynamics and health status.
Conclusion
K. pneumoniae was found in the feces of wild Sumatran orangutans. The virulence of K. pneumoniae was determined by the presence of the mrkD, entB, and wabG genes. K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from wild Sumatran orangutans exhibited resistance to multiple antibiotics, including AMP, TET, and E, indicating MDR. Understanding the prevalence, virulence factors, and resistance of K. pneumoniae in orangutans is essential for developing effective conservation and healthcare strategies.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Gunung Leuser National Park for providing samples in this study. The authors also thank the laboratory staff of the Medical Microbiology Division, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University. This research was funded by Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi Tahun Anggaran 2023, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia Contract No: 001/E5/PG.02.00.PL/2023.
List of abbreviations
AMP, ampicillin; C, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; E, erythromycin; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; MAC, MacConkey agar; MASL, meters above sea level; MDR, multidrugs resistant; MHA, Mueller-Hinton Agar; NA, nalidixic acid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; rpoB, RNA polymerase subunit b; S, streptomycin; TET, tetracycline; TSA, tryptic soy agar; TSIA, triple sugar iron agar.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest for this.
Authors’ contributions
SS designed the study, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. UA interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. AI was involved in data collection and critical checking of this manuscript. RH contributed to manuscript preparation. TS was involved in data collection. AH in sample isolation and bacteria identification. DAR interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. RIA collected the data and critical checking of this manuscript. DN did bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance testing of bacteria. NM did molecular bacterial identification and gene detection. All the authors read and approved the manuscript for publication.
References
- [1].Habinger SG, Chavasseau O, Jaeger JJ, Chaimanee Y, Soe AN, Sein C, et al. Evolutionary ecology of Miocene hominoid primates in Southeast Asia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15574-z. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15574-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Santika T, Sherman J, Voigt M, et al. Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans. Curr Biol. 2022;32(8):1754–63.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Spehar SN, Sheil D, Harrison T, Louys J, Ancrenaz M, Marshall AJ, et al. Orangutans venture out of the rainforest and into the Anthropocene. Sci Adv. 2018;4(6):1–13. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701422. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Nater A, Mattle-Greminger MP, Nurcahyo A, Nowak MG, de Manuel M, Desai T, et al. Morphometric behavioral, and genomic evidence for a new orangután species. Curr Biol. 2017;27(22):3576–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Meijaard E, Ni’matulalah S, Dennis R, Sherman J, Wich SA. The historical range and drivers of decline of Tapanuli Orang utan. PLoS One. 2021;6(1):e0238087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Safika S, Wardinal W, Ismail YS, Nisa K, Sari WN. Weissella, a novel lactic acid bacteria isolated from wild Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) Vet world. 2019;12(7):1060–5. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1060-1065. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1060-1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].IUCN. Conflict and conservation. Nature in a globalised world report No.1. Gland. IUCN, Switzerland, Europe. 2021 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2021.NGW.1.en. [Google Scholar]
- [8].KSDAE. Directorate general of natural resources and ecosystem conservation. 2016. [08 September 2021]. Available via https://www.ksdae.menlhk.go.id .
- [9].Safika S, Indrawati A, Afiff U, Hastuti YT, Zureni Z, Jati AP. First study on profiling of gut microbiome in wild and captive Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) Vet World. 2023;16(4):717–27. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.717-727. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.717-727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Zahro YRD, Mardiastuti A, Rahman DE. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Biological Science (ICBS. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press International B.V; 2021. 2022. Behavior and food of reintroduced Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) at feeding site and forest area in Lamandau wildlife sanctuary. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.220406.060. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Safika S, Indrawati A, Afif U, Hidayat R, Sunartatie T. Metagenomic analysis of mycobiome in wild and captivity Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2023;10(2):228–36. doi: 10.5455/javar.2023.j673. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2023.j673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Martin RM, Bachman MA. Colonization, infection, and the accessory genome of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:4. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Chen Q, Wang M, Han M, Xu L, Zhang H. Molecular basis of Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization in host. Microb Pathog. 2023;177:106026. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Nakhaee P, Zarif Moghadam H, Shokrpoor S, Razmyar J. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in canaries (Serinuscanaria domestica): a case report. Iranian J Vet Res. 2022;23(3):280–4. doi: 10.22099/IJVR.2022.40469.5870. https://doi.org/10.22099%2FIJVR.2022.40469.5870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Zhang Z, Lei L, Zhang H, Dai H, Song Y, Li L, et al. Molecular investigation of Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical companion animals in Beijing, China, 2017–2019. Pathogens. 2021;10(3):271. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10030271. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Davies YM, Cunha MP, Oliveira MG, Oliveira MC, Philadelpho N, Romero DC, et al. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from passerine and psittacine birds. Avian Pathol. 2016;45(2):194–201. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2016.1142066. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2016.1142066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Riwu KHP, Effendi MH, Rantam FA, Khairullah AR, Widodo A. A review: virulence factors of Klebsiella pneumoniae as emerging infection on the food chain. Vet World. 2022;15(9):2172–9. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.2172-2179. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.2172-2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Vuotto C, Longo F, Balice MP, Donelli G, Varaldo PE. Antibiotic resistance related to biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Pathogens. 2014;3(3):743–58. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3030743. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens3030743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Lee CR, Lee JH, Park KS, Jeon JH, Kim YB, Cha CJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: epidemiology, hypervirulence-associated determinants, and resistance mechanisms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:483. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Choby JE, Howard-Anderson J, Weiss DS. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae—clinical and molecular perspectives. J Intern Med. 2020;287(3):283–300. doi: 10.1111/joim.13007. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Biondo C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the most critical pathogens. Pathogens. 2021;10(10):1310. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101310. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Pulingam T, Parumasivam T, Gazzali AM, Sulaiman AM, Chee JY, Lakshmanan M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: prevalence, economic burden, mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2022;170:106103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Safika S, Nilasari Z, Pasaribu FH. Detection of antibiotic resistance coding gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria isolated from broiler chickens in West Java, Indonesia. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2022;12(7):190–8. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2022.120719. [Google Scholar]
- [24].Alves MS, Dias RC, de Castro AC, Riley LW, Moreira BM. Identification of clinical isolates of indole-positive and indole-negative Klebsiella spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3640–6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00940-06. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00940-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].El Fertas-Aissani R, Messai Y, Alouache S, Bakour R. Virulence profiles and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from different clinical specimens. Pathol Biol. 2013;61(5):209–16. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2012.10.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Brisse S, Fevre C, Passet V, Issenhuth-Jeanjean S, Tournebize R, Diancourt L, et al. Virulent clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae: identification and evolutionary scenario based on genomic and phenotypic characterization. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Colom K, Pérez J, Alonso R, Fernández-Aranguiz A, Lariño E, Cisterna R. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for detection of blaTEM, bla(SHV) and blaOXA-1 genes in Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;223(2):147–51. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00306-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00306-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Chuah LO, Shamila Syuhada AK, Mohamad Suhaimi I, Farah Hanim T, Rusul G. Genetic relatedness, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation of Salmonella isolated from naturally contaminated poultry and their processing environment in northern Malaysia. Food Res Int. 2018;105:743–51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Sahm DF, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. qnr prevalence in ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(8):2872–4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01647-05. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01647-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Song JH, Chang HH, Suh JY, et al. ANSORP Study Group. Macrolide resistance and genotypic characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Asian countries: a study of the Asian network for surveillance of resistant pathogens (ANSORP) J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(3):457–63. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 performance standards for antimicrobial, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2023 [Google Scholar]
- [32].Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Gozalo AS, Elkins WR, Lambert LE, Stock F, Thomas ML 3rd, Woodward RA. Genetic diversity of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates during an outbreak in a non-human primate research colony. J Med Primatol. 2016;45(6):312–7. doi: 10.1111/jmp.12229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Anzai EK, de Souza Júnior JC, Peruchi AR, Fonseca JM, Gumpl EK, Pignatari ACC, et al. First case report of non-human primates (Alouatta clamitans) with the hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype K1 strain ST 23: a possible emerging wildlife pathogen. J Med Primatol. 2017;46(6):337–42. doi: 10.1111/jmp.12296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Liang Z, Wang Y, Lai Y, Zhang J, Yin L, Yu X, et al. Host defense against the infection of Klebsiella pneumoniae: new strategy to kill the bacterium in the era of antibiotics? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1050396. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1050396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1050396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Fliss M, van den Berg CHSB, Kuijper E, Notermans DW, Hendrickx APA, Schoots MH, et al. Brief report: community-acquired Friedlander’s pneumonia and pulmonary metastatic Klebsiella pneumoniae infection caused by hypervirulent ST23 in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;41(8):1133–8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-022-04470-z. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Piazza A, Perini M, Mauri C, Comandatore F, Meroni E, Luzzaro F, Principe L. Antimicrobial susceptibility, virulence, and genomic features of a hypervirulent serotype K2, ST65 Klebsiella pneumoniae causing meningitis in Italy. Antibiotics. 2022;11(2):261. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020261. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Gomes AÉI, Pacheco T, Dos Santos CDS, Pereira JA, Ribeiro ML, Darrieux M, et al. Functional insights from KpfR, a new transcriptional regulator of fimbrial expression that is crucial for Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenicity. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:601921. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.601921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.601921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Miethke M, Marahiel MA. Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71(3):413–51. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00012-07. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00012-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Holden VI, Wright MS, Houle S, Collingwood A, Dozois CM, Adams MD, et al. Iron acquisition and siderophore release by carbapenem-resistant sequence type 258 Klebsiella pneumoniae. mSphere. 2018;3(2):e00125–18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00125-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00125-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Ballén V, Gabasa Y, Ratia C, Ortega R, Tejero M, Soto S. Antibiotic resistance and virulence profiles of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from different clinical sources. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:738223. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.738223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.738223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Fatima S, Liaqat F, Akbar A, Sahfee M, Samad A, Anwar M, et al. Virulent and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical samples in Balochistan. Int Wound J. 2021;18(4):510–8. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13550. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Paczosa MK, Mecsas J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80(3):629–61. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00078-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00078-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Kikuchi S, Kosai K, Ota K, Mitsumoto-Kaseida F, Sakamoto K, Hasegawa H, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring rmpA in Japanese adults. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33265-1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33265-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Wu J, Zhang Q, Deng W, Qian J, Zhang S, Liu W. Toward improvement of erythromycin A production in an industrial Saccharopolyspora erythraea strain via facilitation of genetic manipulation with an artificial attB site for specific recombination. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(21):7508–16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06034-11. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06034-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Chen D, Feng J, Huang L, Zhang Q, Wu J, Zhu X, et al. Identification and characterization of a new erythromycin biosynthetic gene cluster in actinopolysporaerythraea YIM90600, a novel erythronolide-producing halophilic actinomycete isolated from salt field. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].De Simeis D, Serra S. Actinomycetes: a never-ending source of bioactive compounds-an overview on antibiotics production. Antibiotics. 2021;10(5):483. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050483. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].García-Estrada C, Martín JF, Cueto L, Barreiro C. Omics approaches applied to Penicilliumchrysogenum and penicillin production: revealing the secrets of improved productivity. Genes. 2020;11(6):712. doi: 10.3390/genes11060712. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Bhowmik P, Modi B, Roy P, Chowdhury A. Strategies to combat gram-negative bacterial resistance to conventional antibacterial drugs: a review. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2023;14(5):333–46. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0323. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].De Oliveira DMP, Forde BM, Kidd TJ, Harris PNA, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33(3):e00181–19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00181-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00181-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Russo A, Fusco P, Morrone HL, Trecarichi EM, Torti C. New advances in management and treatment of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023;21(1):41–55. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2151435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2023.2151435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





