Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2025 Feb 27;75(2):006697. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006697

Establishment of the Nichols strain as the type strain of Treponema pallidum

Steven J Norris 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC11868658  PMID: 40014041

Abstract

In this article, it is proposed that the Nichols strain of Treponema pallidum be established as the type strain. T. pallidum was first identified as the causative agent of syphilis in 1905, and the Nichols strain was isolated in 1912 by inoculation of a rabbit with cerebrospinal fluid from a patient with neurosyphilis. The Nichols strain has been maintained by serial passage in rabbits for over a century, and historically most studies of T. pallidum have been conducted using this strain. In recent years, a procedure for continuous in vitro culture of T. pallidum in a tissue culture system has been developed, making propagation of this spirochaete easier and hence facilitating research. The Nichols strain has >99% DNA homology with a group of organisms that cause syphilis, bejel/endemic syphilis and yaws in humans, a yaws-like disease in primates and spirochaetosis in rabbits and hares. This group is highly similar in terms of their gene and G+C content, genome synteny, cell morphology, natural dependence on mammalian hosts and ability to cause long-term infections; variation occurs in host range, modes of transmission, aptitude for dissemination, manifestations, congenital infection and geographical distribution. Availability of a type strain will aid in the formal acceptance of T. pallidum subspecies first described in 1984 and supported by recent whole-genome analyses of numerous strains from the T. pallidum-related group.

Keywords: bejel, Nichols strain, syphilis, Treponema pallidum, type strain, yaws


Drs Fritz Schaudinn and Erich Hoffman [1] first described the causative agent of syphilis in 1905, characterizing the organism as a slender spirochaete with a length of 4–10 µm, a width less than 0.5 µm and 3–12 turns in its helical shape. Its characteristic motility, consisting of rotation, reversal and flexion, was also noted in this earliest portrayal. The bacterium was first named Spirochaeta pallida, but in the same year, Schaudinn recognized its differences from previously characterized Spirochaeta species and changed the name to Treponema pallidum [2]. Although the identification of T. pallidum as the cause of syphilis was questioned initially, by 1906, over 200 articles had been published confirming this finding (reviewed by Buschke and Fischer [3]). The study of T. pallidum progressed rapidly during the initial decade of the 20th century, including the application of darkfield microscopy by Richter, Landsteiner and others to improve visualization of the spirochaete (as reviewed in [4]), the identification of Compound 606 (the arsphenamine Salvarsan, later refined into the less toxic derivative Neosalvarsan) as a treatment for syphilis by Ehrlich and colleagues [5,6] and the discovery of antibody reactivities useful in the diagnosis of syphilis by von Wassermann and other investigators [7]. Many early studies were focused on in vitro isolation and culture of T. pallidum, and success was reported as early as 1906 [8,9]. Culture methods included the combined use of tissue fragments, serum and anaerobic conditions, and indeed, some of these experiments may have been successful. However, the T. pallidum cultivation procedures were found to be either irreproducible or the result of contamination with commensal skin spirochaetes (such as Treponema phagedenis) [10,11].

Physiologic studies and cultivation efforts continued through the decades [9,12,16]. In 1981, Fieldsteel et al. [17] reported limited, but highly reproducible, multiplication of T. pallidum in a coculture system with Sf1Ep rabbit epithelial cells under microaerobic conditions. Additional studies have shown that long-term T. pallidum survival, metabolic activities and propagation are dependent upon the presence of ~1.5–5% oxygen [13,16,18], thus establishing that the organism is a microaerophile. Further refinement of this system in 2017 through the utilization of a more complex basal medium resulted in continuous in vitro culture of several T. pallidum strains [25,27], including both syphilis and bejel (endemic syphilis) isolates. Thus far, in vitro culture of yaws isolates has been unsuccessful. The availability of a system for in vitro cultivation has provided new avenues for T. pallidum research, including more detailed analyses of its growth requirements [25], host–pathogen interactions [28], antimicrobial susceptibility [29,34], genetics [35], gene expression [36], protein synthesis [37] and gene function through genetic manipulation [38,42].

The T. pallidum-related group

The spirochaetes that cause syphilis, yaws, bejel and infections in rabbits and hares are all very closely related and are hereafter called the T. pallidum-related group. These organisms are morphologically indistinguishable, are all obligate parasites of humans or other mammals and cause persistent infections with varying degrees of tissue invasion. Strains of T. pallidum that cause syphilis in humans are the most invasive organisms of this group [43,47]. The disease is sexually transmitted, and initial infections are characterized by the formation of a localized lesion called a chancre at the site of exposure within 2–4 weeks. These lesions contain large numbers of T. pallidum that can be detected during the active phase using darkfield microscopy, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescent microscopy or nucleic acid-based tests. The organisms readily disseminate through the circulatory system and can colonize any tissue. Within weeks to months after infection, multiple secondary lesions (often presenting as a rash) may occur in the skin or mucus membranes. If not treated with penicillin or other antibiotics, the infection enters into a latent phase which may continue for the lifetime of the patient. In roughly one-third of untreated patients, late (or tertiary) manifestations occur, affecting the nervous system (neurosyphilis) or the heart and major blood vessels (cardiovascular syphilis). A third form of late syphilis is called gummatous syphilis and is characterized by the formation of destructive granulomatous lesions (gummas) at any location. Finally, congenital syphilis results from the passage of T. pallidum from the mother to the foetus, causing either stillbirth, active infection at the time of birth or latent infection which can then progress to symptomatic disease later in childhood [44,48, 49].

Another organism of this group, initially described in 1905 as ‘Spirochaeta pertenuis’ by Castellani [50] and later called Treponema pertenue [51], causes yaws. The human infection with this spirochaete occurs in tropical areas and is spread by skin-to-skin contact, typically within the childhood and adolescent years [52]. Although it often causes only skin lesions, yaws can result in painful, destructive lesions of the nose or of the arm or leg bones; long-term lesions can cause disfigurement, including a bowing of the lower legs called sabre shins. A naturally occurring disease of primates (e.g. baboons and chimpanzees) is caused by organisms that are genetically indistinguishable from those that give rise to yaws in humans [53,54]; in primates, this disease can be transmitted sexually and may result in severe lesions in the genital region [54]. Endemic syphilis, now commonly referred to by the Arabic term bejel, is also transmitted by skin-to-skin contact among children but is found in arid climates; it also causes skin lesions and disfiguring destruction of cartilage or bone. Both yaws and bejel can cause lifetime infections if not treated with antibiotics, but congenital transmission of these diseases does not appear to occur [52]. The differences in dissemination, the occurrence of internal lesions and congenital transmission may be related to varying temperature sensitivity [55,56] and minor genetic differences between the subgroups of T. pallidum causing syphilis, yaws and bejel (see below). Another member of the T. pallidum-related group, Treponema carateum, is described as the causative agent of pinta, an infection that occurred in some areas of South America [52]; pinta cases have not been reported in recent years. T. carateum was detected by microscopy but has never been isolated or otherwise characterized. Treponema paraluiscuniculi, or the proposed species Treponema paraluisleporidarum [57,58], cause infections in lagomorphs (rabbits and hares) and also share characteristics of the T. pallidum-related group [59].

Nomenclature history

In the 1984 edition of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Dr Robert M. Smibert established subspecies of T. pallidum [60]. Prior to that edition, the causative agents of syphilis and yaws were called T. pallidum and T. pertenue, respectively. There was no separate designation for the agent of bejel, which was considered to be a subset of T. pallidum. In 1980, Miao and Fieldsteel [61] utilized DNA–DNA reassociation hybridization to determine that the T. pallidum strains Nichols and KKJ and the T. pertenue strain Gauthier had >98% overall sequence identity. In contrast, virtually no hybridization was observed between the DNA of the pathogenic treponemes with that of the nonpathogenic Treponema species T. phagedenis and Treponema refringens [62]. Based on their (1) high degree of sequence identity indicated by DNA–DNA hybridization; (2) near identical G+C content (in the range of 52.4–53.7% based on melting temperature); (3) indistinguishability of cells at the morphologic level; (4) extreme dependence on the human host and (5) similar disease manifestations, Dr Smibert decided that listing T. pallidum and T. pertenue as separate species was not justified. He therefore renamed them as the subspecies T. pallidum subsp. pallidum and T. pallidum subsp. pertenue. In addition, he established a third subspecies, T. pallidum subsp. endemicum, as the causative agent of bejel. T. carateum was left as a separate species because of the lack of DNA–DNA hybridization or mol% G+C data.

The genomes of members of the T. pallidum-related group consist of a single circular chromosome of ~1.14 Mb, and over 500 genomes of T. pallidum strains are currently available in the U.S. National Center of Biotechnology GenBank database. No other replicons have been identified in T. pallidum genomic sequences. Representative complete genomes have between 1089 and 1135 annotated genes, with near complete synteny [63]; the main differences are typically single-gene insertions or deletions, with many of these being members of the T. pallidum Repeat (tpr) gene family. The overall nucleotide sequence identity across the three subspecies is more than 99.7% [64], thus justifying their grouping as a single species. The only other closely related species identified to date are T. paraluiscuniculi and the proposed T. paraluisleporidarum, which have an overall sequence identity with T. pallidum of ~99.3% [65].

Although based initially on different disease manifestations, transmission patterns and geographic distributions, the subspecies designations described by Smibert [60] have withstood the test of time and the flood of genetic data over the past four decades. Despite 99.7% overall nucleotide sequence identity, the T. pallidum subspecies do form separate entities based on genetic differences, as well as pathogenic patterns. Phylogenetic trees based on whole-genome comparisons consistently feature longer branch lengths among the three subspecies, yielding three distinct groups; in addition, within the T. pallidum subsp. pallidum group, there are two clusters (called the Nichols and SS14 clusters, named for two representative strains) that have resulted from a more recent divergence [63,66,71]. The differences between the subspecies and the clusters are related to the occurrence of nonsynonymous changes in a subset of genes, as described in the above references.

The small group of T. pallidum-related spirochaetes have certain shared ‘treponeme-specific’ genes [e.g. the cytoplasmic filament protein A gene (cfpA)] and significant overall protein sequence similarity with other species within the genus Treponema. In addition, many of the Treponema species are also host-dependent and are found in nature only in association with mammalian hosts (usually in the oral cavity, intestinal tract or integument). However, the T. pallidum-related group is distinct from all other Treponema species characterized to date in terms of their extremely small genome size, overall DNA sequence identity and much higher G+C content [72]. A phylogenomic tree based on the concatenated protein products from 120 single-copy genes [73] shows that T. pallidum is well separated from most Treponema species, although T. phagedenis, Treponema medium and Treponema vincentii retain some degree of similarity. These differences indicate that the T. pallidum-related group has diverged substantially from other Treponema species in the process of adapting to the mammalian host tissue environment.

Overall, there is overwhelming evidence for the existence of three subgroups within T. pallidum which, on a biological and genetic basis, should be considered subspecies. Indeed, the subspecies designations have been used in over 300 scientific journal articles since 1984. However, these designations are not considered validly published. Therefore, the T. pallidum subspecies are not included in the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in the Nomenclature (https://LPSN.dsmz.de) and thus cannot be utilized in the Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria.

The Nichols strain as type strain

The main purpose of this article is to establish the Nichols strain as the type strain for T. pallidum as a first step of the process to obtain valid publication of the three subspecies. The establishment of a type species is being carried out under the provisions of Rule 18f in the 2022 Revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes [74], which states (in part) the following: ‘If a description or illustration constitutes, or a dead preserved specimen has been designated the type of a species [Rule 18a(1)] and later a strain of this species is cultivated, then the type strain may be designated by the person who isolated the strain or by a subsequent author.’ In this case, the type of the species T. pallidum was designated by the descriptions and illustrations produced by Schaudinn and Hoffman [1]. The Nichols strain was later isolated and propagated by rabbit inoculation by Nichols and Hough [75]. The article you are reading represents the designation of the Nichols strain as the type strain ‘by a subsequent author’.

The Nichols strain was isolated by Nichols and Hough [75] in 1912 using inoculation of a rabbit’s testes with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from a patient with recurrent neurosyphilis following treatment with salvarsan. The choice of rabbit testicular inoculation was based on prior reports (dating back to 1906) of successful transfer of the infection to rabbits by this means (reviewed by Willcox and Guthe [9]). Swelling of one of the testes and the presence of spirochaetes in an aspirate from the tissue were noted on day 50 after inoculation with 3 ml of CSF per testis, and the infection was successfully transferred to another rabbit on day 74. The strain was maintained by continuous serial passage in rabbits (and perhaps other animals, such as hamsters or guinea pigs [56]) until the 1970s. Thereafter, long-term storage of viable T. pallidum extracts by freezing at either −70 °C or under liquid N2 temperatures (with the addition of 10–20% glycerol as a cryoprotectant) became a common laboratory practice. The passage history of the Nichols strain is not clearly documented and likely involved many parallel pathways. Prominent participants in this process in the 1900s included the Nichols laboratory (until 1923) [76], the very active group of Brown and Pearce [77], Drs Turner, Hollander and Hardy and Ms Ellen Nell at the International Treponematoses Laboratory Center at Johns Hopkins University [56], Drs Ruth Boak and James N. Miller and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). More recently, the laboratories of Lorenzo Giacani, Sheila A. Lukehart, Michael V. Norgard, Steven J. Norris, Justin D. Radolf, David Šmajs and Caroline Cameron have been involved in maintaining the strain. The Nichols strain has recently been deposited at two repositories at BEI Resources and the Leibniz-Institut Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ) to provide more systematic preservation and access.

The selection of the Nichols strain as the type strain was based on its following properties: (1) The Nichols strain is the oldest available strain and was isolated within a few years of the initial identification of T. pallidum as the causative agent of syphilis. (2) It has been the most widely used strain for scientific studies both historically and in recent years. (3) It was the first T. pallidum strain for which a genomic sequence was available [78]. (4) It remains representative of T. pallidum genetic, physiologic, morphologic and pathogenic properties. As part of the latter aspect, T. pallidum Nichols has retained its infectivity in humans, as demonstrated in an (unethical) human inoculation study [79] and a case of accidental laboratory infection [80]. Another candidate for the type strain would be T. pallidum Street Strain 14 (also called SS14), which was isolated in 1977 from a patient in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, by a team that included staff members of the CDC. As indicated above, the Nichols and SS14 strains are considered to be representative of two major phylogenetic clusters of T. pallidum strains from human syphilis cases. Because of the factors listed above, T. pallidum Nichols was chosen as the type strain, but SS14 should be considered an additional reference strain for T. pallidum. As with all micro-organisms, microevolution is continuing in T. pallidum, as indicated by the recent selection of macrolide-resistant strains as well as the frequent discovery of new, novel genotypes [66,67, 69, 81,87]. Thus far, T. pallidum variants identified in venereal syphilis cases have been associated with either the Nichols- or SS14-associated phylogenetic clusters, with the exception of some cases of sexually transmitted infection with T. pallidum strains that have the genotype of bejel isolates [88].

It should be noted that both the Nichols and SS14 strains, although apparently of clonal origin, exhibit definite intrastrain heterogeneity [63,89], as substantiated by the isolation of Nichols strain clones with distinct genotypes [35]. This heterogeneity is limited to a small number of insertion–deletion events, single nucleotide variations, repeat sequence number variation and homopolymer tract length differences, apparently arising during passage in rabbits and, to some extent, during in vitro culture [35]. However, it is believed that the uncloned Nichols strain should serve as the type strain rather than an isolated clone, because the properties of any one chosen clone may not be representative of the entire population.

The Nichols strain can be propagated either by rabbit inoculation [90] or by in vitro culture [26,27]; for details regarding these procedures, refer to the cited articles. In its current form, the in vitro culture system requires Sf1Ep cottontail rabbit epithelial cells, a complex culture medium called TpCM-2, heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum and incubation in a low oxygen atmosphere (1.5% O2, 5% CO2, balance N2) at 34 °C [27]. The doubling time during in vitro culture is long (~40 h) but is similar to the estimated growth rate of 30–33 h occurring during rabbit infection [91,92]. Under standard conditions, cultures typically need to be passaged every 6–8 days [25,27].

The Nichols (Houston) strain was obtained from James N. Miller (University of California at Los Angeles) and has been maintained in the author’s laboratory at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston since 1982. The strain used for deposition in repositories was maintained by serial passage in rabbits with the frequent use of frozen stocks to minimize the number of passages required; the deposited strain has not been passaged in vitro. The Nichols (Houston) strain is available from BEI Resources (as Catalogue No. NR-59701) or from the DSMZ (as DSM 117211). The intrastrain heterogeneity present in Nichols (Houston) was described in detail by Edmondson et al. [35]. Other passages of the Nichols strain, such as Nichols (Seattle), are likely to be highly similar to Nichols (Houston) but may differ in the degree of intrastrain heterogeneity.

Emended description of Treponema pallidum (Schaudinn and Hoffman 1905) Schaudinn 1905, 1728AL (Spirochaeta pallida Schaudinn and Hoffman 1905, 528)

pal'li.dum. L. neut. adj. pallidum, pale, pallid.

Tightly coiled, ~0.18 µm in diameter by 6–20 µm in length. Spiral to wave-shaped with a uniform coil wavelength of ~1.1 μm and an amplitude of 0.2–0.3 μm. The ends of the cells are pointed, and a protrusion of the outer membrane at the end is often visible in well-preserved specimens by electron microscopy with negative staining. Two to four periplasmic flagella are inserted into each end of the cell and overlap in the middle of the cell. Cells are highly motile with rotational motion and the common occurrence of flexion and rotational reversal. Microaerophilic, with an optimal O2 concentration in the range of 1–5%.

Obligate pathogens of humans with subgroups causing syphilis, yaws and bejel (endemic syphilis). Sequence comparisons and DNA–DNA hybridization indicate that >99.7% DNA homology exists between T. pallidum strains, with distinct genotypes existing within the subgroups causing syphilis, yaws and bejel. Naturally occurring infections of other primates (including chimpanzees and baboons) occur and are caused by T. pallidum strains that are genetically indistinguishable from those causing yaws in humans. Experimental infection of rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters and primates is possible and has been commonly used for the isolation of T. pallidum strains. Continuous in vitro propagation of T. pallidum strains causing syphilis and bejel has been achieved in a system utilizing co-incubation with a rabbit epithelial cell culture; strains causing yaws have not as yet been cultured in vitro.

Source: Human patients with syphilis, yaws or bejel; primates with a yaws-related infection.

DNA G+C content (mol%): 52.8 (genome sequence); 52.4–53.7 (Tm).

Type strain: Nichols.

EMBL/GenBank accession number (16S rRNA gene): M88726.

EMBL/GenBank accession number (Nichols strain genome sequence): NC_021490.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Diane G. Edmondson, Bridget D. De Lay and Bruce J. Paster for their careful reading of the manuscript and constructive comments.

Abbreviations

CDC

centers for disease control and prevention

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

Footnotes

Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. R01AI141958. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Schaudinn F, Hoffman E. Vorläufiger bericht über das vorkommen für spirochaeten in syphilitischen krankheitsprodukten und bei papillomen. Arb Gesundh Amt Berlin. 1905;22:528–534. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schaudinn F. Korrespondenzen. Deut Med Wochenschr. 1905;31:1728. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buschke A, Fischer W. Über die beziehungen der Spirochaete pallida zur kongenitalen syphilis, nebst einigen bemerkungen über ihre lagerung im gewebe bei akquirierter lues. Archiv für Dermatologie und Syphilis. 1906;82:63–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luger A. Die bedeutung der arbeiten karl landsteiners für die syphilisforschung. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1991;103:146–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ehrlich P. Beitrage zur Experimentellen Pathologie und Chemiotherapie. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft; 1909. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lloyd NC, Morgan HW, Nicholson BK, Ronimus RS. The composition of Ehrlich’s salvarsan: resolution of a century-old debate. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005;44:941–944. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.von Wassermann A, Neisser A, Bruck C. Eine serodiagnostische Reaktion bei Syphilis. Dtsch med Wochenschr. 1906;32:745–746. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1142018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schereschewsky J. Züchtung der Spirochaete pallida (Schaudinn) Dtsch med Wochenschr. 1909;35:835. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1201453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Willcox RR, Guthe T. Treponema pallidum. A bibliographical review of the morphology, culture and survival of T. pallidum and associated organisms. Bull WHO Suppl. 1966;35:1–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Noguchi H. Certain alterations in biological properties of spirochaetes through artificial cultivation. Ann Inst Pasteur. 1916;30:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noguchi H. In: The New Knowledge of Bacteriology and Immunology. Jordan EO, Falk IS, editors. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1928. The spirochetes; pp. 452–497. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nelson RA. Factors affecting the survival of Treponema pallidum in vitro. Am J Hyg. 1948;48:120–132. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cox DL. Culture of Treponema pallidum. Meth Enzymol. 1994;236:390–405. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(94)36029-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Norris SJ, Cox DL, Weinstock GM. Biology of Treponema pallidum: correlation of functional activities with genome sequence data. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3:37–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Radolf JD, Deka RK, Anand A, Šmajs D, Norgard MV, et al. Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete: making a living as a stealth pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:744–759. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fitzgerald T. In vitro cultivation of Treponema pallidum: a review. Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59:787–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fieldsteel AH, Cox DL, Moeckli RA. Cultivation of virulent Treponema pallidum in tissue culture. Infect Immun. 1981;32:908–915. doi: 10.1128/iai.32.2.908-915.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cox CD, Barber MK. Oxygen uptake by Treponema pallidum. Infect Immun. 1974;10:123–127. doi: 10.1128/iai.10.1.123-127.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fitzgerald TJ, Johnson RC, Sykes JA, Miller JN. Further observations on the interaction of Treponema pallidum (Nichols strain) with cultured mammalian cells: effects of oxygen, reducing agents, serum supplements, and other cell types. Infect Immun. 1977;15:444–452. doi: 10.1128/iai.15.2.444-452.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Norris SJ, Miller JN, Sykes JA. Long-term incorporation of tritiated adenine into deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid by Treponema pallidum (Nichols strain) Infect Immun. 1980;29:1040–1049. doi: 10.1128/iai.29.3.1040-1049.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Norris SJ, Miller JN, Sykes JA, Fitzgerald TJ. Influence of oxygen tension, sulfhydryl compounds, and serum on the motility and virulence of Treponema pallidum (Nichols strain) in a cell- free system. Infect Immun. 1978;22:689–697. doi: 10.1128/iai.22.3.689-697.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baseman JB, Nichols JC, Hayes NC. Virulent Treponema pallidum: aerobe or anaerobe. Infect Immun. 1976;13:704–711. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.3.704-711.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fieldsteel AH, Cox DL, Moeckli RA. Further studies on replication of virulent Treponema pallidum in tissue cultures of Sf1Ep cells. Infect Immun. 1982;35:449–455. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.2.449-455.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cover WH, Norris SJ, Miller JN. The microaerophilic nature of Treponema pallidum: enhanced survival and incorporation of tritiated adenine under microaerobic conditions in the presence or absence of reducing compounds. Sex Transm Dis. 1982;9:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Edmondson DG, DeLay BD, Kowis LE, Norris SJ. Parameters affecting continuous in vitro culture of Treponema pallidum strains. mBio. 2021;12:e03536-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03536-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Edmondson DG, Hu B, Norris SJ. Long-term in vitro culture of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum mBio. 2018;9:01153–18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01153-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Edmondson DG, Norris SJ. In vitro cultivation of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum. Curr Protoc. 2021;1:e44. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Primus S, Rocha SC, Giacani L, Parveen N. Identification and functional assessment of the first placental adhesin of Treponema pallidum that may play critical role in congenital syphilis. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:621654. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.621654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Houston S, Schovanek E, Conway KME, Mustafa S, Gomez A, et al. Identification and functional characterization of peptides with antimicrobial activity from the syphilis spirochete, Treponema pallidum. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:888525. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.888525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Edmondson DG, Wormser GP, Norris SJ. In vitro susceptibility of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum to doxycycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00979-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leimer N, Wu X, Imai Y, Morrissette M, Pitt N, et al. A selective antibiotic for Lyme disease. Cell. 2021;184:5405–5418. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haynes AM, Giacani L, Mayans MV, Ubals M, Nieto C, et al. Efficacy of linezolid on Treponema pallidum, the syphilis agent: a preclinical study. EBioMedicine. 2021;65:103281. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tantalo LC, Lieberman NAP, Pérez-Mañá C, Suñer C, Vall Mayans M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum: an in-vitro study. Lancet Microbe . 2023;4:e994–e1004. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00219-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tantalo LC, Luetkemeyer A, Lieberman NAP, Nunley BE, Avendaño C, et al. Long-term in vitro exposure of Treponema pallidum to sub-bactericidal doxycycline did not induce resistance: implications for doxy-PEP and syphilis. J Infect Dis. 2024:jiae381. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Edmondson DG, De Lay BD, Hanson BM, Kowis LE, Norris SJ. Clonal isolates of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum Nichols provide evidence for the occurrence of microevolution during experimental rabbit infection and in vitro culture. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0281187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.De Lay BD, Cameron TA, De Lay NR, Norris SJ, Edmondson DG. Comparison of transcriptional profiles of Treponema pallidum during experimental infection of rabbits and in vitro culture: highly similar, yet different. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009949. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Houston S, Gomez A, Geppert A, Goodyear MC, Cameron CE. In-depth proteome coverage of in vitro-cultured Treponema pallidum and quantitative comparison analyses with in vivo-grown treponemes. J Proteome Res. 2024;23:1725–1743. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Romeis E, Lieberman NAP, Molini B, Tantalo LC, Chung B, et al. Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum with an artificially impaired TprK antigenic variation system is attenuated in the rabbit model of syphilis. bioRxiv. 2023;2023:2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.18.524629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Romeis E, Tantalo L, Lieberman N, Phung Q, Greninger A, et al. Genetic engineering of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009612. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Phan A, Romeis E, Tantalo L, Giacani L. In vitro transformation and selection of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. Curr Protoc. 2022;2:e507. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Grillová L, Romeis E, Lieberman NAP, Tantalo LC, Xu LH, et al. Bright new resources for syphilis research: genetically encoded fluorescent tags for Treponema pallidum and Sf1Ep cells. Mol Microbiol. 2024;122:455–464. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Delgado KN, Vicente CF, Hennelly CM, Aghakhanian F, Parr JB, et al. Development and utilization of Treponema pallidum expressing green fluorescent protein to study spirochete-host interactions and antibody-mediated clearance: expanding the toolbox for syphilis research. bioRxiv . 2024;2024:2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.21.619476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peeling RW, Mabey D, Kamb ML, Chen XS, Radolf JD, et al. Syphilis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17073. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Labudde EJ, Lee J. A review of syphilis infection in pediatric patients. Pediatr Rev. 2024;45:373–380. doi: 10.1542/pir.2023-006309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gjestland T. The Oslo study of untreated syphilis: an epidemiologic investigation of the natural course of syphilis infection based upon a re-study of the Boeck-Bruusgaard material. Acta Dermato-Vener. 1955;35:1–368. doi: 10.2340/00015555343368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stokes JH. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1934. Modern clinical syphilology, 2nd edn. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hook EW. 3rd. Syphilis. Lancet. 2017;389:1550–1557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32411-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Salomè S, Cambriglia MD, Montesano G, Capasso L, Raimondi F. Congenital syphilis: a re-emerging but preventable infection. Pathogens. 2024;13:481. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13060481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cooper JM, Sánchez PJ. Congenital syphilis. Semin Perinatol. 2018;42:176–184. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Castellani A. On the presence of spirochetes in some cases of parangi (yaws, framboesia tropica): preliminary note. J Ceylon Brit Med Assoc. 1905;2:54. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Castellani A, Chalmers AJ. Manual of Tropical Medicine, 1st ed. London: Bailliere, Tindall and Cox; 1910. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Antal GM, Lukehart SA, Meheus AZ. The endemic treponematoses. Microbes Infect. 2002;4:83–94. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(01)01513-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Janečková K, Roos C, Fedrová P, Tom N, Čejková D, et al. The genomes of the yaws bacterium, Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue, of nonhuman primate and human origin are not genomically distinct. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17:e0011602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Knauf S, Gogarten JF, Schuenemann VJ, De Nys HM, Düx A, et al. Nonhuman primates across sub-Saharan Africa are infected with the yaws bacterium Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:157. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0156-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hollander DH, Turner TB. The role of temperature in experimental treponemal infection. Am J Syph Gonorrhea Vener Dis. 1954;38:489–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Turner TB, Hollander DH. Biology of the Treponematoses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lumeij JT. Syphilis in European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) Vet Q. 1996;18 Suppl 3:S151–2. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1996.9694723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lumeij JT, Mikalová L, Smajs D. Is there a difference between hare syphilis and rabbit syphilis? Cross infection experiments between rabbits and hares. Vet Microbiol. 2013;164:190–194. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Knauf S, Hisgen L, Ågren EO, Barlow AM, Faehndrich M, et al. High prevalence and genetic diversity of Treponema paraluisleporidarum isolates in European lagomorphs. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e0177423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01774-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Smibert RM. In: Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Kreig NR, Holt JG, editors. Vol. 1. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1984. Genus III: Treponema Schaudinn 1905, 1728AL; pp. 49–57. vol. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Miao RM, Fieldsteel AH. Genetic relationship between Treponema pallidum and Treponema pertenue, two noncultivable human pathogens. J Bacteriol. 1980;141:427–429. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.1.427-429.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Miao RM, Fieldsteel AH. Genetics of Treponema: relationship between Treponema pallidum and five cultivable treponemes. J Bacteriol. 1978;133:101–107. doi: 10.1128/jb.133.1.101-107.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Šmajs D, Strouhal M, Knauf S. Genetics of human and animal uncultivable treponemal pathogens. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;61:92–107. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Staudová B, Strouhal M, Zobaníková M, Cejková D, Fulton LL, et al. Whole genome sequence of the Treponema pallidum subsp. endemicum strain Bosnia A: the genome is related to yaws treponemes but contains few loci similar to syphilis treponemes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Šmajs D, Zobaníková M, Strouhal M, Čejková D, Dugan-Rocha S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Treponema paraluiscuniculi, strain Cuniculi A: the loss of infectivity to humans is associated with genome decay. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Arora N, Schuenemann VJ, Jäger G, Peltzer A, Seitz A, et al. Origin of modern syphilis and emergence of a pandemic Treponema pallidum cluster. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16245. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pla-Díaz M, Sánchez-Busó L, Giacani L, Šmajs D, Bosshard PP, et al. Evolutionary processes in the emergence and recent spread of the syphilis agent, Treponema pallidum. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:msab318. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nishiki S, Lee K, Kanai M, Nakayama SI, Ohnishi M. Phylogenetic and genetic characterization of Treponema pallidum strains from syphilis patients in Japan by whole-genome sequence analysis from global perspectives. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82337-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Beale MA, Marks M, Cole MJ, Lee M-K, Pitt R, et al. Global phylogeny of Treponema pallidum lineages reveals recent expansion and spread of contemporary syphilis. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:1549–1560. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01000-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Smajs D, Norris SJ, Weinstock GM. Genetic diversity in Treponema pallidum: implications for pathogenesis, evolution and molecular diagnostics of syphilis and yaws. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Čejková D, Strouhal M, Norris SJ, Weinstock GM, Šmajs D. A retrospective study on genetic heterogeneity within Treponema strains: subpopulations are genetically distinct in a limited number of positions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Norris SJ, Paster BJ, Smibert RM. In: Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Krieg NR, Brown DR, Hedlund B, Daniel R, Paster BJ, et al., editors. Vol. 4. New York: Springer; 2010. Treponema ; pp. 501–531. vol. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brune A, Song Y, Oren A, Paster BJ. A new family for 'termite gut treponemes': description of Breznakiellaceae fam. nov., Gracilinema caldarium gen. nov., comb. nov., Leadbettera azotonutricia gen. nov., comb. nov., Helmutkoenigia isoptericolens gen. nov., comb. nov., and Zuelzera stenostrepta gen. nov., comb. nov., and proposal of Rectinemataceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R, et al. International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes: prokaryotic code (2022 revision) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nichols HJ, Hough WH. Demonstration of Spirochaeta pallida in the cerebrospinal fluid from a patient with nervous relapse following the use of salvarsan. J Amer Med Assoc. 1913;60:108–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nichols HJ, Walker JE. Experimental observations on the prophylaxis and treatment of syphilis. J Exp Med. 1923;37:525–542. doi: 10.1084/jem.37.4.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Brown WH, Pearce LP. Note on the preservation of stock strains of Treponema pallida and on the demonstration of infection in rabbits. J Exp Med. 1921;34:185–188. doi: 10.1084/jem.34.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fraser CM, Norris SJ, Weinstock GM, White O, Sutton GG, et al. Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. Science. 1998;281:375–388. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5375.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Magnuson HJ, Thomas EW, Olansky S, Kaplan BI, DeMello L, et al. Inoculation syphilis in human volunteers. Medicine. 1956;35:33–82. doi: 10.1097/00005792-195602000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fitzgerald TJ, Johnson RC, Smith M. Accidental laboratory infection with Treponema pallidum. J Am Vener Dis Assoc. 1976;3:76–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Velasquez MR, De Lay BD, Edmondson DG, Wormser GP, Norris SJ, et al. A novel Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum strain associated with a painful oral lesion is a member of a potentially emerging Nichols-related subgroup. Sex Transm Dis. 2024;51:486–492. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lieberman NP, Avendaño C, Nunley E, Xie H, Giacani L. Genomic epidemiology of Treponema pallidum and circulation of strains with diminished tprk antigen variation capability in Seattle, 2021-2022. J Infect Dis. 2024;229:866–875. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Beale MA, Marks M, Sahi SK, Tantalo LC, Nori AV, et al. Genomic epidemiology of syphilis reveals independent emergence of macrolide resistance across multiple circulating lineages. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3255. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lukehart SA, Godornes C, Molini BJ, Sonnett P, Hopkins S, et al. Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the United States and Ireland. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:154–158. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Stamm LV, Bergen HL. A point mutation associated with bacterial macrolide resistance is present in both 23S rRNA genes of an erythromycin-resistant Treponema pallidum clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:806–807. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.3.806-807.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lieberman NAP, Reid TB, Cannon CA, Nunley BE, Berzkalns A, et al. Near-universal resistance to macrolides of Treponema pallidum in North America. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:2127–2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2314441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Aldrete S, Kroft SH, Romeis E, Lieberman NAP, Greninger AL, et al. Whole genome sequence of a Treponema pallidum strain from a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded fine needle aspirate of a cervical lymph node. Sex Transm Dis. 2023;50:550–552. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Noda AA, Grillová L, Lienhard R, Blanco O, Rodríguez I, et al. Bejel in Cuba: molecular identification of Treponema pallidum subsp. endemicum in patients diagnosed with venereal syphilis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1210. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pětrošová H, Pospíšilová P, Strouhal M, Čejková D, Zobaníková M, et al. Resequencing of Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum strains Nichols and SS14: correction of sequencing errors resulted in increased separation of syphilis treponeme subclusters. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lukehart SA, Marra CM. Isolation and laboratory maintenance of Treponema pallidum. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2007;Chapter 12:1. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc12a01s7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Cumberland MC, Turner TB. The rate of multiplication of Treponema pallidum in normal and immune rabbits. Am J Syph. 1949;33:201–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Magnuson HJ, Eagle H. The minimal infectious inoculum of Spirochaeta pallida (Nichols strain) and a consideration of its rate of multiplication in vivo. Am J Syph. 1948;32:1–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES