Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1997 May;225(5):570–578. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199705000-00013

Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations.

G W Carlson 1, J Bostwick 3rd 1, T M Styblo 1, B Moore 1, J T Bried 1, D R Murray 1, W C Wood 1
PMCID: PMC1190797  PMID: 9193184

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared skin-sparing mastectomy and traditional mastectomy both followed by immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Skin-sparing mastectomy is used increasingly in the treatment of breast cancer to improve the aesthetic results of immediate reconstruction. The oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of this procedure have never been analyzed closely. METHODS: Institutional experience with 435 consecutive patients who underwent total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction from January 1989 through December 1994 was examined. Mastectomies were stratified into skin-sparing (SSM) and non-skin-sparing (non-SSM) types. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven SSMs and 188 non-SSMs were performed. The mean follow-up was 41.3 months (SSM, 37.5 months, non-SSM, 48.2 months). Local recurrences from invasive cancer occurred after 4.8% of SSMs versus 9.5% of non-SSMs. Sixty-five percent of patients who underwent SSMs had nothing performed on the opposite breast versus 45% in the group of patients who underwent non-SSM (p = 0.0002). Native skin flap necrosis occurred in 10.7% of patients who underwent SSMs versus 11.2% of patients who underwent non-SSMs. CONCLUSIONS: Skin-sparing mastectomy facilitates immediate breast reconstruction by reducing remedial surgery on the opposite breast. Native skin flap necrosis is not increased over that seen with non-SSM. Skin-sparing mastectomies can be used in the treatment of invasive cancer without compromising local control.

Full text

PDF
571

Images in this article

571Figure 1.
on p.571
572Figure 3.
on p.572
573Figure 4.
on p.573
573Figure 5.
on p.573

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong R. W., Berkowitz R. L., Bolding F. Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1989 Oct;23(4):284–288. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198910000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton F. E., Jr, English J. M., Kingsley W. B., Fietz M. Glandular excision in total glandular mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Sep;88(3):389–394. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199109000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson G. W. Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg. 1996 Feb;62(2):151–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang L. D., Buncke G., Slezak S., Buncke H. J. Cigarette smoking, plastic surgery, and microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996 Oct;12(7):467–474. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deck K. B., Kern W. H. Local recurrence of breast cancer. Arch Surg. 1976 Apr;111(4):323–325. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360220019002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickson M. G., Sharpe D. T. The complications of tissue expansion in breast reconstruction: a review of 75 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1987 Nov;40(6):629–635. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donegan W. L., Perez-Mesa C. M., Watson F. R. A biostatistical study of locally recurrent breast carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966 Mar;122(3):529–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dowden R. V. Selection criteria for successful immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Oct;88(4):628–634. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199110000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilliland M. D., Barton R. M., Copeland E. M., 3rd The implications of local recurrence of breast cancer as the first site of therapeutic failure. Ann Surg. 1983 Mar;197(3):284–287. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198303000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hartrampf C. R., Jr, Bennett G. K. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg. 1987 May;205(5):508–519. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198705000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kroll S. S., Ames F., Singletary S. E., Schusterman M. A. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Jan;172(1):17–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kroll S. S., Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Sep;90(3):455–462. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kroll S. S., Netscher D. T. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Dec;84(6):886–892. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198912000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lipshy K. A., Neifeld J. P., Boyle R. M., Frable W. J., Ronan S., Lotfi P., Bear H. D., Horsley J. S., 3rd, Lawrence W., Jr Complications of mastectomy and their relationship to biopsy technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996 May;3(3):290–294. doi: 10.1007/BF02306285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCraw J. B., Horton C. E., Grossman J. A., Kaplan I., McMellin A. An early appraisal of the methods of tissue expansion and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 1987 Feb;18(2):93–113. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198702000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moore T. S., Farrell L. D. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Apr;89(4):666–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Russell I. S., Collins J. P., Holmes A. D., Smith J. A. The use of tissue expansion for immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Med J Aust. 1990 Jun 18;152(12):632–635. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb125418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scheflan M., Dinner M. I. The transverse abdominal island flap: part I. Indications, contraindications, results, and complications. Ann Plast Surg. 1983 Jan;10(1):24–35. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198301000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schuster R. H., Rotter S., Boonn W., Efron G. The use of tissue expanders in immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer. Br J Plast Surg. 1990 Jul;43(4):413–418. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(90)90005-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Slavin S. A., Colen S. R. Sixty consecutive breast reconstructions with the inflatable expander: a critical appraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Nov;86(5):910–919. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199011000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Slavin S. A., Love S. M., Sadowsky N. L. Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Nov;90(5):854–869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toth B. A., Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Jun;87(6):1048–1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vinton A. L., Traverso L. W., Jolly P. C. Wound complications after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg. 1991 May;161(5):584–588. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90905-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ward J., Cohen I. K., Knaysi G. A., Brown P. W. Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987 Oct;80(4):559–566. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198710000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Watterson P. A., Bostwick J., 3rd, Hester T. R., Jr, Bried J. T., Taylor G. I. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with 556 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jun;95(7):1185–1194. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199506000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES