Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1988 Aug;402:421–442. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017213

Instability in human forearm movements studied with feed-back-controlled muscle vibration.

A Prochazka 1, P S Trend 1
PMCID: PMC1191900  PMID: 2976825

Abstract

1. Frequency-modulated vibration was applied to the elbow flexor and extensor tendons to produce reflex movements of the forearm in normal subjects. The modulating (command) signal caused equal and opposite deviations from the 40 Hz carrier frequency so that when flexor vibratory frequency increased, extensor frequency decreased, and vice versa. 2. It is argued that the movements resulted largely from the reflex action of muscle spindle primary afferents whose firing frequency had been 'taken over' and modulated by the vibration. 3. Bode plots relating forearm movements to command signal (modulating) frequency showed the transfer function of the Ia afferent-CNS-muscle-load system to have a low-pass filter characteristic. The phase lag of movement on command increased progressively with command signal frequency, exceeding 180 deg at 3-4 Hz. 4. The transduced forearm movements were fed back to provide the command signal to the vibrators (and thus indirectly to the spindle afferents) via a filter mimicking the dynamic responsiveness of muscle spindle primary endings. Our aim was to 'break into' the reflex arc, and re-route it so that we could artificially vary the gain without significantly altering the dynamics of the pathway. 5. Nearly all subjects developed forearm oscillations (tremor) when the gain exceeded a threshold value. Subjects varied widely in their threshold, though for a given subject the threshold remained fairly constant from day to day. The results suggest that reflexly active individuals may not have a large safety margin with respect to forearm instability. 6. The frequency range of the oscillations observed in seven subjects was 3-8 Hz. The frequencies depended upon the level of flexor-extensor co-contraction, and increased from 3 to 5 Hz at 10% co-contraction to 5-8 Hz at 100% co-contraction. An analysis of the mechanical impedance of the arm provided estimates of tremor frequencies consistent with these results. 7. These unexpectedly low tremor frequencies led us to propose that it may be erroneous to expect stretch reflexes to contribute to forearm tremor in the range 8-12 Hz (e.g. physiological and 'enhanced' physiological tremors). Rather, their contributions should be sought in the range 3-8 Hz (e.g. pathological tremors such as those of Parkinson's and cerebellar disease).

Full text

PDF
421

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amis A., Prochazka A., Short D., Trend P. S., Ward A. Relative displacements in muscle and tendon during human arm movements. J Physiol. 1987 Aug;389:37–44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BIANCONI R., van der MEULEN J. The response to vibration of the end organs of mammalian muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Jan;26:177–190. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bizzi E., Dev P., Morasso P., Polit A. Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. J Neurophysiol. 1978 May;41(3):542–556. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.3.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown M. C., Engberg I., Matthews P. B. The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):773–800. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown T. I., Rack P. M., Ross H. F. Forces generated at the thumb interphalangeal joint during imposed sinusoidal movements. J Physiol. 1982 Nov;332:69–85. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke D., Hagbarth K. E., Löfstedt L., Wallin B. G. The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. J Physiol. 1976 Oct;261(3):695–711. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke R. E., Levine D. N., Zajac F. E., 3rd Mammalian motor units: physiological-histochemical correlation in three types in cat gastrocnemius. Science. 1971 Nov 12;174(4010):709–712. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4010.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W. J., Poppele R. E. Small-signal analysis of response of mammalian muscle spindles with fusimotor stimulation and a comparison with large-signal responses. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Jan;41(1):15–27. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cussons P. D., Matthews P. B., Muir R. B. Enhancement by agonist or antagonist muscle vibration of tremor at the elastically loaded human elbow. J Physiol. 1980 May;302:443–461. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis J. N. The response to stretch of human intercostal muscle spindles studied in vitro. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):561–579. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans C. M., Fellows S. J., Rack P. M., Ross H. F., Walters D. K. Response of the normal human ankle joint to imposed sinusoidal movements. J Physiol. 1983 Nov;344:483–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fellows S. J., Rack P. M. Changes in the length of the human biceps brachii muscle during elbow movements. J Physiol. 1987 Feb;383:405–412. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox J. R., Randall J. E. Relationship between forearm tremor and the biceps electromyogram. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Jul;29(1):103–108. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.29.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodwin G. M., Hulliger M., Matthews P. B. The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency-response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle. J Physiol. 1975 Dec;253(1):175–206. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hagbarth K. E., Wallen G., Löfstedt L. Muscle spindle activity in man during voluntary fast alternating movements. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975 Jul;38(7):625–635. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.38.7.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoy M. G., Zernicke R. F., Smith J. L. Contrasting roles of inertial and muscle moments at knee and ankle during paw-shake response. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Nov;54(5):1282–1294. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.5.1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacks A., Prochazka A., Trend P. S. Instability in human forearm movements studied with feed-back-controlled electrical stimulation of muscles. J Physiol. 1988 Aug;402:443–461. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Joyce G. C., Rack P. M., Ross H. F. The forces generated at the human elbow joint in response to imposed sinusoidal movements of the forearm. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):351–374. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Joyce G. C., Rack P. M. The effects of load and force on tremor at the normal human elbow joint. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):375–396. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee R. G., Stein R. B. Resetting of tremor by mechanical perturbations: a comparison of essential tremor and parkinsonian tremor. Ann Neurol. 1981 Dec;10(6):523–531. doi: 10.1002/ana.410100606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthews P. B. Evidence from the use of vibration that the human long-latency stretch reflex depends upon spindle secondary afferents. J Physiol. 1984 Mar;348:383–415. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matthews P. B., Muir R. B. Comparison of electromyogram spectra with force spectra during human elbow tremor. J Physiol. 1980 May;302:427–441. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matthews P. B., Stein R. B. The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723–743. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matthews P. B., Watson J. D. Action of vibration on the response of cat muscle spindle Ia afferents to low frequency sinusoidal stretching. J Physiol. 1981 Aug;317:365–381. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matthews P. B., Watson J. D. Effect of vibrating agonist or antagonist muscle of the reflex response to sinusoidal displacement of the human forearm. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:297–316. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Partridge L. D. Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1966 May;210(5):1178–1191. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.5.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Poppele R. E., Bowman R. J. Quantitative description of linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Jan;33(1):59–72. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Poppele R. E., Kennedy W. R. Comparison between behavior of human and cat muscle spindles recorded in vitro. Brain Res. 1974 Jul 26;75(2):316–319. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90753-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prochazka A., Hulliger M., Zangger P., Appenteng K. 'Fusimotor set': new evidence for alpha-independent control of gamma-motoneurones during movement in the awake cat. Brain Res. 1985 Jul 22;339(1):136–140. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90632-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rack P. M., Ross H. F. The role of reflexes in the resting tremor of Parkinson's disease. Brain. 1986 Feb;109(Pt 1):115–141. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rack P. M., Ross H. F., Thilmann A. F. The ankle stretch reflexes in normal and spastic subjects. The response to sinusoidal movement. Brain. 1984 Jun;107(Pt 2):637–654. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.2.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Roll J. P., Vedel J. P. Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res. 1982;47(2):177–190. doi: 10.1007/BF00239377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rothwell J. C., Traub M. M., Day B. L., Obeso J. A., Thomas P. K., Marsden C. D. Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain. 1982 Sep;105(Pt 3):515–542. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.3.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schlapp M. Observations on a voluntary tremor--violinist's virbato. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1973 Oct;58(4):357–368. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1973.sp002229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES