Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genitourinary Medicine logoLink to Genitourinary Medicine
. 1997 Feb;73(1):59–62. doi: 10.1136/sti.73.1.59

Non-cultural detection of rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhoea by the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay.

H Young 1, J Anderson 1, A Moyes 1, A McMillan 1
PMCID: PMC1195762  PMID: 9155558

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay, which uses a chemiluminescent labelled single-stranded DNA probe to detect gonococcal ribosomal RNA (rRNA), for the non-cultural detection of rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhoea in homosexual men. SUBJECTS: 161 homosexual men attending the Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary during the latter half of 1995 and the first quarter of 1996. METHODS: Duplicate rectal and pharyngeal swabs were collected for culture on modified New York City (MNYC) medium and detection of gonococcal nucleic acid by the Gen-Probe assay. Repeatedly reactive Gen-Probe specimens from culture negative patients were also tested by the Gen-Probe competition assay (PCA). RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 23 (14.3%) gave a positive culture at one or both sites (rectum 10, throat 8, rectum and throat 5) compared with 28 (16.7%) who gave a positive Gen-Probe result at one or both sites (rectum 9, throat 11, rectum and throat 8). After resolution of discrepant results by PCA the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Gen-Probe was 94.1%, 100%, 100% and 99.3% for rectal specimens while the corresponding values for pharyngeal specimens were 86.4%, 100%, 100%, and 97.9%. The sensitivity and NPV of rectal culture were 88.2% and 98.6% while the corresponding values for pharyngeal culture were 59% and 93.9%. Gen-Probe was significantly more sensitive than throat culture (p < 0.05) but not rectal culture (p > 0.2). The average Relative Light Units (RLU) value for the cut-off was 386 (range 351-450) while the average for a positive result was 20306 (range 403-110104): this was, however, significantly higher (p = 0.019) in rectal specimens 31325 (range 1705-110104) than in throat specimens 10447 (range 403-15633). CONCLUSIONS: Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay is a sensitive and specific method for the detection of rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhoea. As the Gen-Probe assay may detect nucleic acid from non viable gonococci the clinical significance of a probe positive culture negative specimen from a patient without culture evidence of gonorrhoea at another site is uncertain and requires further consideration. Nevertheless a positive result does indicate exposure to infection and could be important in ensuring appropriate partner notification action. If non-cultural methods are used to screen for gonococcal infection cultures should be obtained from patients with positive results in order that the antibiotic susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of the gonococcal population can be monitored.

Full text

PDF
60

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burn S., Horner P. J. Rectal gonorrhoea as an independent risk factor for HIV infection in homosexual males. Genitourin Med. 1995 Oct;71(5):335–336. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.5.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Craib K. J., Meddings D. R., Strathdee S. A., Hogg R. S., Montaner J. S., O'Shaughnessy M. V., Schechter M. T. Rectal gonorrhoea as an independent risk factor for HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men. Genitourin Med. 1995 Jun;71(3):150–154. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.3.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hale Y. M., Melton M. E., Lewis J. S., Willis D. E. Evaluation of the PACE 2 Neisseria gonorrhoeae assay by three public health laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):451–453. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.451-453.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Keet I. P., Albrecht van Lent N., Sandfort T. G., Coutinho R. A., van Griensven G. J. Orogenital sex and the transmission of HIV among homosexual men. AIDS. 1992 Feb;6(2):223–226. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199202000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewis J. S., Fakile O., Foss E., Legarza G., Leskys A., Lowe K., Powning D. Direct DNA probe assay for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in pharyngeal and rectal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2783–2785. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2783-2785.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKenna J. G., Fallon R. J., Moyes A., Young H. Anogenital non-gonococcal neisseriae: prevalence and clinical significance. Int J STD AIDS. 1993 Jan-Feb;4(1):8–12. doi: 10.1177/095646249300400103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Murray A. B., Greenhouse P. R., Nelson W. L., Norman J. E., Jeffries D. J., Anderson J. Coincident acquisition of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and HIV from fellatio. Lancet. 1991 Sep 28;338(8770):830–830. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90726-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwebke J. R., Zajackowski M. E. Comparison of DNA probe (Gen-Probe) with culture for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in an urban STD programme. Genitourin Med. 1996 Apr;72(2):108–110. doi: 10.1136/sti.72.2.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith K. R., Ching S., Lee H., Ohhashi Y., Hu H. Y., Fisher H. C., 3rd, Hook E. W., 3rd Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):455–457. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.455-457.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stary A., Kopp W., Zahel B., Nerad S., Teodorowicz L., Hörting-Müller I. Comparison of DNA-probe test and culture for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital samples. Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Sep-Oct;20(5):243–247. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199309000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vlaspolder F., Mutsaers J. A., Blog F., Notowicz A. Value of a DNA probe assay (Gen-Probe) compared with that of culture for diagnosis of gonococcal infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jan;31(1):107–110. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.1.107-110.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wardropper A., Pattman R. S. An increase in pharyngeal gonorrhoea: cause for concern regarding HIV infection. Genitourin Med. 1992 Oct;68(5):343–344. doi: 10.1136/sti.68.5.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woods G. L., Garza D. M. Use of gen-probe probe competition assay as a supplement to probes for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):177–178. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.177-178.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Young H. Cultural diagnosis of gonorrhoea with modified New York City (MNYC) medium. Br J Vener Dis. 1978 Feb;54(1):36–40. doi: 10.1136/sti.54.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Young H., Moyes A. An evaluation of pre-poured selective media for the isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Med Microbiol. 1996 Apr;44(4):253–260. doi: 10.1099/00222615-44-4-253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Young H., Moyes A. Comparative evaluation of AccuProbe culture identification test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other rapid methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):1996–1999. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.1996-1999.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Young H., Moyes A. Utility of monoclonal antibody coagglutination to identify Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Genitourin Med. 1989 Jan;65(1):8–13. doi: 10.1136/sti.65.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genitourinary Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES