Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2024 Oct 11;53(2):583–592. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02402-x

Epidemiological changes and outcomes of people living with HIV admitted to the intensive care unit: a 14-year retrospective study

Esther Martínez 1,2,3, Alberto Foncillas 4, Adrián Téllez 5, Sara Fernández 5, Gemma Martínez-Nadal 5,6, Verónica Rico 4,5,7, Adrià Tomé 5,8, Ainoa Ugarte 4,5,7, Mariano Rinaudo 5,9, Leire Berrocal 4,10, Elisa De Lazzari 3,4,10,11, Jose M Miró 3,4,10,11, Jose M Nicolás 3,5,10, Josep Mallolas 3,4,10,11, Lorena De la Mora 4,5,#, Pedro Castro 3,5,10,11,✉,#
PMCID: PMC11971213  PMID: 39392586

Abstract

Purposes

Since 2016, the World Health Organization has recommended universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). This recommendation may have influenced the characteristics and outcomes of PLHIV admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This study aims to identify changes in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of PLHIV admitted to the ICU, and their short- and medium-term outcomes before and after the implementation of universal ART (periods 2006–2015 and 2016–2019).

Methods

This retrospective, observational, single-center study included all adult PLHIV admitted to the ICU of a University Hospital in Barcelona from 2006 to 2019.

Results

The study included 502 admissions involving 428 patients, predominantly men (75%) with a median (P25-P75) age of 47.5 years (39.7–53.9). Ninety-one percent were diagnosed with HIV before admission, with 82% under ART and 60% admitted from the emergency department. In 2016–2019, there were more patients on ART pre-admission, reduced needs for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and fewer in-ICU complications. ICU mortality was also lower (14% vs 7%). Predictors of in-ICU mortality included acquired immunodeficiency syndrome defining event (ADE)-related admissions, ICU complications, higher SOFA scores, IMV and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement. ART use during ICU admission was protective. Higher SOFA scores, admission from hospital wards, and more comorbidities predicted one-year mortality.

Conclusions

The in-ICU mortality of critically ill PLHIV has decreased in recent years, likely due to changes in patient characteristics. Pre- and ICU admission features remain the primary predictors of short- and medium-term outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-024-02402-x.

Keywords: Intensive care unit (ICU), Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HIV infection, Critical care, Antiretroviral therapy (ART), Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Introduction

The epidemiology and prognosis of people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) have substantially improved over the last two decades, thanks to more potent and safer antiretroviral therapy (ART) [1, 2]. These changes are also evident in PLHIV requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, who now have significantly better short- and long-term survival rates compared to the early years of the epidemic, when their prognosis was often considered fatal, and ICU admission was deemed inappropriate [3–5].

The improved prognosis for these patients is largely due to advancements in critical illness management and, most importantly, enhancements in HIV treatment. The availability and efficacy of ART, along with optimized virological suppression and immunological recovery, have led to changes in the reasons for ICU admission, decreasing those related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events (ADE), including opportunistic infections (OI), and increasing non-ADE admissions [4, 6–10].

Following several clinical trials demonstrating the benefits of early ART initiation [11, 12], the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended early ART for all PLHIV in 2016, regardless of immunological status [13]. The impact of this recommendation on critically ill PLHIV, particularly concerning ART use during and after ICU admission, as well as short- and medium-term outcomes and prognosis, remains largely unknown.

This study aims to identify any changes in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of PLHIV admitted to the ICU and their short- and medium-term outcomes before and after the implementation of universal ART in 2016.

Materials and methods

This article was written following STROBE recommendations.

Design, setting, and study population

This retrospective, observational, single-center study included all consecutive ICU admissions at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona for more than 12 h, with an HIV diagnosis made before, during, or immediately after ICU admission. Exclusions were made for patients admitted only to resuscitation areas or emergency boxes, as well as ICU readmissions during the same hospitalization or within one-month post-ICU discharge. The study period covered from 17/11/2006 to 31/12/2019. To identify temporal changes, ICU admissions were divided into two periods: 2006–2015 and 2016–2019, with the latter period marking the WHO’s universal ART recommendation. Data were sourced from electronic medical records.

Study variables

Variables included: i. general information [demographics, medical history]; ii. HIV infection-related information [diagnosis date, pre-admission and ICU plasma RNA viral load (VL), CD4 + T-lymphocytes counts (absolute number and percentage, nadir, pre-admission, and in-ICU), previous ADE (including OI), ART regimens, and adherence]; iii. ICU admission-related information [admission date, cause, vital signs and main laboratory values at admission, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at admission, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), renal replacement therapy (RRT), or vasopressors, complications, ICU mortality, ART use, and discharge date]; and iv. outcomes at ICU discharge [status at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post- discharge, ART use, immunological status, and mortality].

When assessing comorbidities, distinctions were made between those related to toxic habits (smoking, alcoholism, intravenous drug use, Hepatitis C Virus infection (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus infection and liver cirrhosis) and unrelated comorbidities. Detailed variable definitions and measurement methods are provided in supplementary information (SI1).

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were described using medians and interquartile ranges. Qualitative variables were described by frequencies and absolute percentages. To compare admissions between the two periods (2006–2015 vs. 2016–2019) and to identify risk factors for ICU mortality and one-year mortality post-ICU discharge (response variables), univariable logistic regressions were conducted with each of the 3 response variables and each variable of interest as a covariate. For each response variable, multiple logistic regression was performed with variables found statistically significant in the univariable analysis as covariates, alongside clinically significant variables. Final models were selected using a backward stepwise variable selection approach. For ICU mortality, all admissions were considered, and all variables collected before ICU discharge or in-ICU decease were evaluated. For one-year mortality, only admissions discharged alive from ICU and variables after discharge were considered. Kaplan–Meier curves depicted survival probabilities. For ICU mortality, time from admission to in-ICU death was evaluated. Those admissions not presenting the outcome were censored at the time of ICU discharge. For one-year after ICU discharge mortality, time from ICU discharge to death was evaluated. Discharged admissions were censored if they were readmitted, were lost to follow up before 1 year, or at 365 days. Robust standard errors specifying patients as clusters were calculated for both univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted by sex and age at ICU admission. All tests were two-tailed, and the statistical significance threshold was set to 5%, except when selecting statistically significant covariates from the univariable logistic regressions to add them as covariates in the multivariable logistic regression models, where statistical significance threshold was set to 10%. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata [14].

Ethics

The project (Evolution of HIV patients’ epidemiology in the ICU 2000–2020) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Reference HCB/2023/0077) on February 9th, 2023.

Results

Characteristics and outcomes

The study included 502 admissions involving 428 patients. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and ST1. The majority were male (75%), with a median (P25-P75) age of 47.5 years (39.7–53.9). Ninety-one percent were diagnosed with HIV before ICU admission, with a median duration since diagnosis of 15.7 years (7.4–21.7).

Table 1.

Main characteristics of admissions included in the study (total and by periods, univariable analysis)

Variablesa Total (n = 502) 2006–2015 (n = 328) 2016–2019 (n = 174) OR (95% CI) p Value
Sex (male)b 375 (75%) 249 (76%) 126 (72%) –* –*
Age (years)b 47.5 (39.7–53.9) 46.1 (39.6–52.4) 50 (41.5–57.3) –* –*
Number of comorbidities 0 (0–2) 0 (0–1) 1 (0–2) 1.09 (0.91–1.31) 0.336
IVDUc 179 (36%) 139 (42%) 40 (23%) 0.40 (0.24–0.67) 0.001
Alcohol consumption 139 (28%) 102 (31%) 37 (21%) 0.60 (0.37–0.96) 0.035
HCV-coinfection 226 (45%) 161 (49%) 65 (37%) 0.61 (0.40–0.93) 0.022
Previous HIV diagnosis at admission 459 (91%) 299 (91%) 160 (92%) 0.96 (0.48–1.90) 0.902
Time between HIV diagnosis and Hospital admission (years) (n = 420) 15.71 (7.41–21.68) 13.41 (6.31–19.31) 20.17 (9.77–25.72) 1.08 (1.04–1.11)  < 0.001
Undetectable VLd pre-admission (n = 403) 257 (64%) 156 (60%) 101 (70%) 1.34 (0.85–2.12) 0.205
CD4 + count pre-admission (cells/mm3) (n = 398) 254 (102–468) 243 (111–443) 290 (82–536) 1.02 (0.98–1.06)e 0.268
ART pre-admission (n = 445) 367 (82%) 230 (79%) 137 (88%) 1.73 (0.92–3.23) 0.087
Pre-admission OI prophylaxis (n = 417) 86 (21%) 62 (23%) 24 (17%) 0.71 (0.42–1.20) 0.202
Admission source
 Emergency department 299 (60%) 191 (58%) 108 (62%) 1 0.632
 Hospital ward 111 (22%) 75 (23%) 36 (21%) 0.87 (0.54–1.41)
 Others (operating room, another ICU) 92 (18%) 62 (19%) 30 (17%) 0.79 (0.47–1.32)
Days of hospitalization before ICUf (n = 111) 8 (4–16) 8 (4–19) 8.5 (3–14.5) 0.98 (0.95–1.02) 0.383
Type of ICU admission (medical/surgical)
 Medical admission 384 (76%) 244 (74%) 140 (80%) 1 0.097
 Surgical admission (elective) 76 (15%) 50 (15%) 26 (15%) 0.81 (0.47–1.40)
 Surgical admission (urgent) 42 (8%) 34 (10%) 8 (5%) 0.43 (0.20–0.95)
Main cause of ICU admissiong
 Infectious process 273 (54%) 183 (56%) 90 (52%) 0.90 (0.61–1.31) 0.567
 Respiratory infection 162 (32%) 121 (37%) 41 (24%) 0.54 (0.35–0.84) 0.006
 ADE 109 (22%) 72 (22%) 37 (21%) 1.04 (0.65–1.64) 0.880
 OI 94 (19%) 64 (20%) 30 (17%) 0.91 (0.56–1.48) 0.702
 Surgical process (elective and non-elective) 121 (24%) 87 (27%) 34 (20%) 0.64 (0.40–1.03) 0.065
APACHE II (admission) 18 (14–22) 18 (14–22) 18 (13–21) 0.97 (0.94–1.00) 0.080
SOFA (admission) 5.5 (3–8) 6 (4–9) 4.5 (3–7) 0.89 (0.84–0.95)  < 0.001
SOFA at 48 h 4 (3–6) 4 (3–7) 4 (2–5) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) 0.006
Need of IMV 216 (43%) 170 (52%) 46 (26%) 0.34 (0.22–0.51)  < 0.001
Need of NIV 68 (14%) 46 (14%) 22 (13%) 0.83 (0.43–1.62) 0.583
Vasopressors 220 (44%) 165 (50%) 55 (32%) 0.46 (0.30–0.69)  < 0.001
 Norepinephrine 218 (43%) 164 (50%) 54 (31%) 0.45 (0.30–0.68)  < 0.001
 Epinephrine 16 (3%) 10 (3%) 6 (3%) 1.07 (0.39–2.93) 0.889
 Dobutamine 30 (6%) 21 (6%) 9 (5%) 0.71 (0.30–1.68) 0.441
RRT 36 (7%) 20 (6%) 16 (9%) 1.76 (0.80–3.86) 0.162
Total parenteral nutrition 90 (18%) 68 (21%) 22 (13%) 0.57 (0.33–0.99) 0.047
ART during ICU admission (n = 429) 228 (53%) 140 (50%) 88 (59%) 1.40 (0.89–2.20) 0.144
 For the first time (naïve patient) (n = 21) 14 (7%) 9 (7%) 5 (6%) 0.93 (0.29–3.01)) 0.901
VL (copies/mL) in ICU (n = 247) 154 (49–116,800) 166.5 (49–120,500) 135 (49–82,300) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.273
 Only in detectable patients (n = 135) 82,300 (6276–336,400) 105,900 (8641–295,600) 68,220 (2010–511000) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.345
CD4 + count (cells/mm3) in ICU (n = 233) 109 (37–262) 115 (41–260) 78 (24–281) 0.97 (0.91–1.04)e 0.432
Complications in ICU (n = 500) 210 (42%) 160 (49%) 50 (29%) 0.43 (0.29–0.65)  < 0.001
 Surgical wound infection 49 (10%) 47 (14%) 2 (1%) 0.07 (0.02–0.29)  < 0.001
 UTI 26 (5%) 17 (5%) 9 (5%) 0.90 (0.38–2.13) 0.811
 VAP 24 (5%) 19 (6%) 5 (3%) 0.47 (0.17–1.31) 0.150
 CRBSI 25 (5%) 21 (6%) 4 (2%) 0.33 (0.11–1.01) 0.052
 Non-CRBSI 41 (8%) 38 (12%) 3 (2%) 0.14 (0.04–0.46) 0.001
ICU length of stay (days) 4 (2–9) 4 (2–10) 4 (2–8) 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.190
Hospital length of stay (days) (n = 500) 17 (8–33) 18 (9–35) 16 (8–29) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.527
ICU readmission during the same stay (n = 369) 28 (8%) 12 (5%) 16 (11%) 2.07 (0.94–4.56) 0.073
Death during ICU admission 59 (12%) 47 (14%) 12 (7%) 0.45 (0.23–0.88) 0.020
Death during entire hospitalizationh 88 (18%) 66 (20%) 22 (13%) 0.55 (0.32–0.95) 0.032

Categorical variables are expressed as n (%) and quantitative variables as median (P25-P75)

ADE acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining event, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, ART antiretroviral therapy, CI confidence interval, CRBSI catheter related bloodstream infection, HCV hepatitis C virus, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, ICU intensive care unit, IMV invasive mechanical ventilation, IVDU intravenous drug users, NIV non-invasive ventilation, OI opportunistic infection, OR odds ratio, RRT renal replacement therapy, SOFA sepsis-related organ failure assessment, UTI urinary tract infection, VAP ventilator-associated pneumonia, VL viral load (copies/ml)

aUnder each variable, the sample size (n) on which the analysis was conducted is provided if it is not the whole cohort (patients for whom the information was not available are excluded). bUsed as adjustment variable; cPast and current; d < 50 copies/ml; ePer increase of 50 cells/mm3; fOnly for patients admitted from hospitalization wards; patients coming from emergency department are excluded; gOne patient could share several categories; hIncludes deaths both in ICU and in hospitalization. *These variables are for adjustment, and their odds ratio (OR) are not interpreted

Most admissions (60%, 299/502) were from the emergency department. The most frequent reasons for admission were non-ADE (78%, 393/502). ADE admissions were mostly due to OI (86%, 94/109).

APACHE II and SOFA scores at admission were 18 (14–22) and 5.5 (3–8), respectively. Forty-three percent of patients required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), 44% required vasopressors, and 7% needed RRT.

ART use was prevalent, with 82% of admissions on ART pre-ICU, 53% during ICU stay, and 89–89-88% of survivors continuing ART upon hospital discharge, at 6 and 12 months, respectively (Tables 1, 2; Fig. 1). ICU survivors showed progressive CD4 T cell count increases post-discharge (Table 2; Fig. 1).

Table 2.

Characteristics related to ICU discharge outcomes of ICU survivors included in the study (total and by periods, univariable analysis)

Variablesa Total (n = 443) 2006–2015 (n = 281) 2016–2019 (n = 162) OR (95% CI) p Value
Sex (male)b 326 (74%) 210 (75%) 116 (72%) –* –*
Age (years)b 47 (39.7–53.9) 45.9 (39.6–51.8) 50.1 (42.2–57.4) –* –*
Hospital readmission at 3 months post-ICU discharge (n = 310) 117 (38%) 55 (30%) 62 (49%) 2.21 (1.32–3.70) 0.003
 ICU readmission at 3 months (n = 116) 26 (22%) 15 (28%) 11 (18%) 0.58 (0.22–1.54) 0.277
Hospital readmission at 12 months post-ICU discharge (n = 269) 94 (35%) 43 (29%) 51 (42%) 1.89 (1.06–3.39) 0.032
 ICU readmission at 12 months (n = 92) 10 (11%) 5 (12%) 5 (10%) 0.59 (0.14–2.42) 0.463
Therapies after ICU discharge:
 Permanent hemodialysis (n = 31) 9 (29%) 4 (27%) 5 (31%) 1.74 (0.24–12.89) 0.586
 Home oxygen therapy (n = 352) 17 (5%) 7 (3%) 10 (7%) 2.25 (0.46–11.07) 0.319
 Home NIV (n = 355) 2 (0%) 1 (0%) 1 (1%) 1.49 (0.13–17.09) 0.748
 Discharge to a Nursing Home (n = 341) 31 (9%) 20 (10%) 11 (8%) 0.73 (0.32–1.68) 0.459
Continued ART at ICU discharge (n = 284) 220 (77%) 121 (72%) 99 (85%) 2.11 (1.12–3.99) 0.021
Continued ART at hospital discharge (n = 282) 251 (89%) 143 (87%) 108 (92%) 1.51 (0.67–3.36) 0.319
Continued ART at 6 months (n = 242) 215 (89%) 116 (87%) 99 (91%) 1.28 (0.53–3.08) 0.585
Continued ART at 12 months (n = 358) 316 (88%) 191 (87%) 125 (90%) 1.38 (0.66–2.90) 0.391
First CD4 count (cells/mm3) post-ICU discharge (n = 255) 245 (103–483) 245.5 (131–448) 232 (95–536) 1.03 (0.98–1.08)c 0.243
CD4 count (cells/mm3) 3–6 months post-ICU discharge (n = 207) 296 (151–464) 281 (158–448) 312 (111.5–484) 1.02 (0.97–1.08)c 0.440
CD4 count (cells/mm3) 6–12 months post-ICU discharge (n = 212) 332 (186.5–519) 345 (193–520) 330 (160–504) 0.98 (0.92–1.04)c 0.483
Death within one-year post-ICU discharge (n = 443) 64 (14%) 44 (16%) 20 (12%) 0.64 (0.36–1.14) 0.133

Categorical variables are expressed as n (%) and quantitative variables as median (P25-P75)

ART antiretroviral therapy, CI confidence interval, ICU intensive care unit, NIV non-invasive ventilation, OR odds ratio

aUnder each variable, the sample size (n) on which the analysis was conducted is provided (ICU non-survivors and patients for whom the information was not available are excluded); bUsed as adjustment variable; cPer increase of 50 cells/mm3. *These variables are for adjustment, and their odds ratio (OR) are not interpreted

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

ART use during different periods and CD4 T cell count in total and by periods (2006–2015 and 2016–2019). ART: antiretroviral therapy; ICU: intensive care unit; m: months. *p < 0.05 comparing 2006–2015 and 2016–2019 periods

Mortality rates were 12% in the ICU and 18% during hospitalization. Among ICU survivors, one-year mortality was 14%.

Temporal changes in admission characteristics and outcome

Comparing the two periods, significant differences emerged in patients’ characteristics (Tables 1, ST1 and ST2). Mortality was lower in the second period (14% vs. 7% (OR 0.45 [0.23–0.88]; p = 0.020) and one-year post-ICU discharge (16% vs. 12%, OR 0.64 [0.36–1.14], p = 0.133), although the latter did not reach statistical significance (Tables 1, 2). Kaplan–Meier curves illustrate survival probabilities (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing the periods of study (2006–2015 and 2016–2019). A ICU survival probability. B One-year survival probability (among ICU survivors). ICU: intensive care unit

After multivariable adjustment, significant differences persisted in admission characteristics (ST3). The second period saw more patients on ART pre-admission (OR 2.03 [1.00–4.11]; p = 0.049), fewer current/former intravenous drug users (IVDU) (OR 0.41 [0.24–0.72]; p = 0.002), fewer surgical admissions (OR 0,55 [0.32–0.95]; p = 0.033), lower IMV need (OR 0.42 [0.26–0.68]; p < 0.001), and fewer ICU complications such as surgical wound infection (OR 0.04 [0.00–0.28]; p = 0.001) and non-catheter-related bloodstream infection (non-CRBSI) (OR 0.13 [0.03–0.56]; p = 0.006). For ICU survivors, RRT need also increased in the second period (OR 5.74 [1.87–17.66]; p = 0.002). ICU and one-year mortality rates were not significantly different among periods in this adjusted analysis.

Predictors of ICU and one-year mortality

ADE-related admissions (OR 2.38 [1.09–5.22]; p = 0.030), ICU complications (OR 2.28 [1.04–4.96]; p = 0.038), higher SOFA scores at admission (OR 1.11 [1.01–1.23]; p = 0.037), IMV (OR 7.51 [2.46–22.95]; p < 0.001) and RRT requirement (OR 3.79 [1.26–11.44]; p = 0.018) predicted ICU mortality, whereas ART use during ICU admission (OR 0.42 [0.21–0.88]; p = 0.021) was protective. For one-year mortality, higher SOFA scores at admission (OR 1.13 [1.05–1.22]; p = 0.002), admission from hospital wards (OR 2.97 [1.54–5.72]; p = 0.005) and more comorbidities (OR 1.52 [1.20–1.91]; p < 0.001), were significant predictors (Fig. 3). ST4 and ST5 show univariable analysis for ICU and one-year mortality.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Prognosis factors for ICU and one-year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression results adjusted for gender and age at ICU admission. ADE: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events; ART: antiretroviral therapy; ICU: intensive care unit; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; RRT: renal replacement therapy; SOFA: Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment. Definitions can be found at electronic supplementary material 1

Discussion

This study confirms a significant decrease in mortality among critically ill PLHIV when comparing the periods 2006–2015 and 2016–2019. The reduction in mortality is attributable to changes in patients' characteristics.

Despite advancements in ART access and management, especially in Western and Central Europe and North America [1, 2], the primary characteristics of PLHIV have remained relatively consistent over the study periods. Most admissions (82%) were previously on-ART; however, despite a non-significant trend towards an increase in pre-admission CD4 count (250 vs 287.5 cells/mm3, OR 1.02 [0.98–1.06]), nearly 40% of these patients had detectable VL and advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell count < 200 cells/mm3), with ART typically initiated approximately two years after diagnosis.

A shift in comorbidity patterns over time has been observed. The prevalence of IVDU and related comorbidities, such as HCV co-infection and liver cirrhosis, has decreased. In contrast, comorbidities associated with aging and cardiovascular risk have increased, consistent with findings from other studies [7, 15–17]. This trend reflects changes in drug consumption patterns within the population [2], improved infection control, and increased life expectancy. Consequently, there are now more opportunities for developing comorbidities related to age, lifestyle, and ART [8, 18, 19].

Infectious events, especially respiratory infections, were the main causes of ICU admissions, particularly in the earlier period, in line with recent literature [20]. ADEs accounted for 22% of admissions, a rate consistent with other studies, though we did not observe a decrease in ADE-related admissions in recent years reported by others [4, 6, 7]. This may be due to stable rates of late HIV diagnoses within our ICU admissions, that account for most of ADEs admissions, and it is lower than recent published data by others [2, 7].

Supportive measures such as IMV and vasopressor use have decreased over time in our cohort. This differs from other studies showing stable IMV rates but decreased vasopressor use [4, 6, 7]. Similarly, our cohort had lower rates of RRT compared to others [4, 6, 7]. Differences in admission policies, critical patient management and the period of analysis may potentially justify these differences.

A notable reduction in ICU complications was observed, likely due to improved critical care management and preventive measures against ICU-acquired infections. Spanish National Safety Program, initiated in 2009, has contributed to significant reductions in infection rates, aligning with our findings [21].

We observed a significant increase in ART use at ICU discharge (72% vs. 85%) and a non-significant increase at hospital discharge (87% vs. 92%) and 12-monts follow up (87% vs 90%) between the first and second period, respectively. This change aligns with the main clinical guidelines for HIV treatment, which since 2016 recommend ART initiation regardless of immune status [22–25].

A significant decrease in mortality, particularly in the ICU, with a trend toward reduced mortality at one-year post-discharge was found. Multivariable adjustment showed that this reduction was associated with differences in patient characteristics and management between the two periods. As previously noted, the need for IMV, a critical factor associated with mortality, was significantly less prevalent in the second period, as were ICU complications. Notably, the decrease in IMV requirements in the most recent period is a novel finding not yet described in the literature.

Large studies have demonstrated significant improvements in survival among PLHIV due to widespread ART use and effective immunovirological control [26–29]. However, few studies have evaluated recent changes in ICU mortality among PLHIV [4, 6, 7, 9, 15, 30–32]. Typically, ICU mortality has been associated with severity at admission [4, 6, 7, 9, 15, 30], while later mortality has been attributed to virological control and immunological status [31, 32]. Our data support some of these previous findings, showing that severity-associated factors such as the need for IMV, RRT, SOFA score and ICU complications influence ICU mortality.

We found that ART use during ICU was a protective factor against ICU mortality. This finding should be interpreted with caution. Although 82% of our entire cohort was on ART before becoming critically ill, ART use during ICU admission dropped to 53%. This reduction reflects the challenges in maintaining oral treatment, managing side effects, dealing with impaired renal and hepatic function, and navigating drug-drug interactions [33, 34]. Consequently, the decision to maintain or initiate ART during ICU admission depends on several factors, which can result in differences between patient groups. We did not assess the exact timing of treatment suspension, the specific reasons for this reduction, or the characteristics of patients who continued or did not continue on ART at ICU admission. However, the proportion of patients using ART in the ICU was similar across both periods (50% in the first period and 59% in the second), particularly for those who were ART-naïve (7% vs. 6%). Although there is no clear data supporting early ART initiation in ICU [35], it is generally recommended to avoid ART discontinuation for more than two weeks to prevent resistance and future HIV treatment failure [33]. Significant changes between periods were observed in the type of ART regimen used, with a decrease in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) in the second period, and a shift towards integrase inhibitors (INSTIs)-based regimens. The safer profile of the latter in terms of drug-drug-interactions, tolerability, and use in patients with impaired organ function, will likely contribute to increase the use of ART in the ICU and improve outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to further increase the rate of ART use during ICU admission.

We did not find virological and immunological status variables associated with one-year mortality among ICU survivors. In contrast, we found that characteristics of ICU admission (SOFA score) and being admitted from the ward (compared to being admitted from the emergency department), may also influence one-year prognosis, together with the number of comorbidities. These results align with other studies, although most do not have a one-year follow-up [7, 17, 19, 26, 36, 37]. Additionally, numerous analyses in critically ill patients (not specifically PLHIV) have shown that ICU admission is associated with increased medium-to-long-term mortality, primarily linked to the Post-ICU Syndrome and increased vascular risk [38, 39]. The lack of influence of immunovirological variables on medium-term survival could be related to the high proportion of patients on ART at ICU discharge. Regarding this point, while most studies in the field have presented data on ART use before ICU admission and some during ICU stay, there is a lack of information on ART use upon ICU discharge. Failure to continue ART after ICU and hospitalization may be one of the main modifiable factors associated with long-term mortality, making it essential to investigate about the elements that influence this situation.

This study has limitations, including its retrospective, observational, and single-center design, which may affect the generalizability of the results. However, it provides valuable insights into the impact of universal ART recommendations on critically ill PLHIV, incorporating extensive data on admission characteristics, immunological status, and follow-up outcomes up to 12 months post-discharge.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ICU and one-year mortality among PLHIV requiring ICU admission have decreased since the extension of ART to all patients, regardless of immunological status, in 2016. This reduction is primarily due to changes in patient profiles, including lower severity and support needs at admission. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and explore factors influencing long-term outcomes.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

Part of our results has been accepted as an e-Poster to be presented at the 37th annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, to be held in October 2024.

Author contributions

EM and PC were involved in the conceptualization, methodology, project administration, validation and visualization of the project. AT was involved in data curation. EM, AF, AT, GMN, VR, AT and AU were involved in the acquisition of data. LB and EDL performed the formal statistical analysis. EM and PC wrote the first original draft. JMM, JMN, JM, LdM and PC validated the results of the investigation. LdM and PC supervised all tasks. All authors critically revised the article and provided final approval of the version submitted for publication.

Funding

Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Esther Martínez received a financial support for this work provided by Fundación Instituto Español de Investigación Enfermera, during 2023–2024. JMM received a personal 80:20 research grant from Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, during 2017–24.

Data availablity

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 

Declarations

Conflict of interest

JMM has received consulting honoraria and/or research grants from Angelini, Basilea, Contrafect, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Jansen, Lysovant, MSD, Pfizer, and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. LDM has received fees to give lectures from Gilead, MSD, ViiV, AbbVie and Janssen-Cilag. PC has received consulting honoraria and/or research grants from Pfizer, MSD, Gilead, AbbVie, Alexion, Janssen, Sanofi and Gilead, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

The project (Evolution of HIV patients’ epidemiology in the ICU 2000–2020) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Reference HCB/2023/0077) on February 9th, 2023.

Footnotes

Lorena De la Mora and Pedro Castro have equally contributed as senior authors.

References

  • 1.Global HIV & AIDS statistics—Fact sheet | UNAIDS [Internet]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet. Accessed 28 Sep 2023.
  • 2.The path that ends AIDS: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2023. 2023; Available from: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules. Accessed 11 Oct 2023.
  • 3.Wachter RM, Luce JM, Turner J, Volberding P, Hopewell PC. Intensive care of patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Outcome and changing patterns of utilization. Am Rev Respiratory Dis. 1986;134:891–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azoulay É, de Castro N, Barbier F. Critically Ill patients with HIV: 40 years later. Chest. Elsevier Inc; 2020. p. 293–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morris A, Masur H, Huang L, Current issues in critical care of the human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient*. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2006;34:42–9. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00003246-200601000-00006. Accessed 20 Jan 2023. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Barbier F, Mer M, Szychowiak P, Miller RF, Mariotte É, Galicier L, et al. Management of HIV-infected patients in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:329–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gaillet A, Azoulay E, de Montmollin E, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Cohen Y, Dupuis C, et al., Outcomes in critically Ill HIV-infected patients between 1997 and 2020: analysis of the OUTCOMEREA multicenter cohort. Crit Care [Internet]. 2023;27. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36915207/. Accessed 3 Oct 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Akgün KM, Tate JP, Pisani M, Fried T, Butt AA, Gibert CL, et al. Medical ICU admission diagnoses and outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and virus-uninfected veterans in the combination antiretroviral era. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1458–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barbier F, Roux A, Canet E, Martel-Samb P, Aegerter P, Wolff M, et al. Temporal trends in critical events complicating HIV infection: 1999–2010 multicentre cohort study in France. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1906–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kanitkar T, Dissanayake O, Bakewell N, Symonds M, Rimmer S, Adlakha A, et al. Changes in short-term (in-ICU and in-hospital) mortality following intensive care unit admission in adults living with HIV: 2000–2019. AIDS [Internet]. 2023; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37605448/. Accessed 28 Sep 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.The INSIGHT START Study Group: Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection [Internet]. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:795–807 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26192873/. Accessed 2 Sep 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Ribaudo HJ, Swindells S, Eron J, Chen YQ, et al. Effects of early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infection: results from the phase 3 HPTN 052 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2014;14:281–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24602844/. Accessed 14 Apr 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection : recommendations for a public health approach:429.
  • 14.StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 18. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akgun KM, Miller RF. Critical care in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients semin respir crit care med. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc; 2016. p. 303–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gutierrez J, Albuquerque ALA, Falzon L. HIV infection as vascular risk: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0176686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Balewell N, Sabin CA, Kanitkar T. Mortality 1 Year After ICU Admission Falls Over 20 Years in HIV Group. 30th CROI, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections [Internet]. Seattle; 2023. Available from: https://www.natap.org/2023/CROI/croi_09.htm. Accessed 20 Oct 2023.
  • 18.Turtle L, Vyakernam R, Menon-Johansson A, Nelson MR, Soni N. Intensive care usage by HIV-positive patients in the HAART era. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2011;2011:847835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morquin D, Le Moing V, Mura T, Makinson A, Klouche K, Jonquet O, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-infected patients admitted to the intensive care unit: impact of antiretroviral therapy and immunovirological status. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schlabe S, Boesecke C, van Bremen K, Schwarze-Zander C, Bischoff J, Yürüktümen A, et al. People living with HIV, HCV and HIV/HCV coinfection in intensive care in a German tertiary referral center 2014–2019. Infection [Internet]. 2023; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37055704/. Accessed 20 Oct 2023. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Proyectos Zero [Internet]. Semicyuc.org. Available from: https://proyectoszero.semicyuc.org/. Accessed 6 Sep 2023.
  • 22.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring : recommendations for a public health approach. World Health Organisation. 2016;110–112. [PubMed]
  • 23.EACS Guidelines 2023—EACS Guidelines [Internet]. Available from: https://eacs.sanfordguide.com/. Accessed 20 Mar 2024.
  • 24.Gandhi RT, Bedimo R, Hoy JF, Landovitz RJ, Smith DM, Eaton EF, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2022 recommendations of the international antiviral society-USA panel. JAMA [Internet]. 2023;329:63–84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36454551/. Accessed 20 Mar 2024. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.HIV Clinical Guidelines: adult and adolescent ARV—What’s new in the guidelines | clinicalinfo.HIV.gov [Internet]. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-arv/whats-new. Accessed 20 Mar 2024.
  • 26.Trickey A, May MT, Vehreschild JJ, Obel N, Gill MJ, Crane HM, et al. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e349–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marcus JL, Chao CR, Leyden WA, Xu L, Quesenberry CP, Klein DB, et al. Narrowing the gap in life expectancy between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals with access to care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr [Internet]. 2016;73:39–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27028501/. Accessed 20 Mar 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Wandeler G, Johnson LF, Egger M. Trends in life expectancy of HIV-positive adults on antiretroviral therapy across the globe: comparisons with general population. Curr Opin HIV AIDS [Internet]. 2016;11:492–500. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27254748/. Accesseed 20 Mar 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Gueler A, Moser A, Calmy A, Günthard HF, Bernasconi E, Furrer H, et al. Life expectancy in HIV-positive persons in Switzerland: matched comparison with general population. AIDS [Internet]. 2017;31:427–36. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27831953/. Accessed 20 Mar 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Vidal-Cortés P, Álvarez-Rocha LA, Fernández-Ugidos P, Pérez-Veloso MA, Suárez-Paul IM, Virgós-Pedreira A, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU in the current highly active antiretroviral therapy era. Med Intensiva. 2020;44:283–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Croda J, Croda MG, Neves A, De Dos Sousa SS. Benefit of antiretroviral therapy on survival of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1605–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Powell K, Davis JL, Morris AM, Chi A, Bensley MR, Huang L. Survival for patients with HIV admitted to the ICU continues to improve in the current era of combination antiretroviral therapy. Chest [Internet]. 2009;135:11–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012369209600611. Accessed 18 Jan 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Walker CK, Shaw CM, Moss Perry MV, Claborn MK. Antiretroviral therapy management in adults with hiv during ICU admission. J Pharm Pract. 2021;35:952–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chastain DB, Tu PJ, Brizzi M, Keedy CA, Baker AN, Jackson BT, et al. Managing modern antiretroviral therapy in the intensive care unit: overcoming challenges for critically Ill people with human immunodeficiency virus. Open Forum Infect Dis [Internet]. 2024;11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38715574/. Accessed 1 Jun 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Falci DR, Boniatti MM, Pellegrini JAS, Marques LS, John JF, Marin LG, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients admitted to an intensive care unit (EARTH-ICU): a randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:0239452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Andrade HB, Shinotsuka CR, Da Silva IRF, Donini CS, Li HY, De Carvalho FB, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy for critically ill HIV patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:0186968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Van Lelyveld SFL, Wind CM, Mudrikova T, Van Leeuwen HJ, De Lange DW, Hoepelman AIM. Short- and long-term outcome of HIV-infected patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:1085–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yanagi N, Kamiya K, Hamazaki N, Matsuzawa R, Nozaki K, Ichikawa T, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome as a predictor of mortality in patients with critical illness: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16:e244564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wieske L, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt DS, Verhamme C, Nollet F, van Schaik IN, Schultz MJ, et al. Impact of ICU-acquired weakness on post-ICU physical functioning: a follow-up study. Crit Care [Internet]. 2015;19. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25928709/. Accessed 8 Oct 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 


Articles from Infection are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES