Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 May;338:221–241. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014670

Synaptic strength as a function of motor unit size in the normal frog sartorius.

A D Grinnell, L O Trussell
PMCID: PMC1197191  PMID: 6308245

Abstract

A wide range of motor unit sizes exists in each frog sartorius, with values of tetanus and twitch tensions extending over 62- and 400-fold ranges, respectively. These differences primarily represent differences in the number, rather than the size, of muscle fibres in each motor unit. Tetanus-to-twitch tension ratios varied markedly between different motor units, ranging from 1.5 to over 190. Because directly stimulated muscle fibres have tetanus/twitch ratios no larger than 3, it is concluded that high tetanus/twitch ratios arise from recruitment of muscle fibres during the tetanus which respond with only subthreshold depolarization during a twitch. Small motor units, as judged either by their twitch or tetanus tension, were associated with higher tetanus/twitch ratios, suggesting that the average safety margin of a motor unit increases with the motor unit's size. Indeed, when the tetanus/twitch ratio of a motor unit is used to determine the fraction of fibres in the unit with subthreshold neuromuscular junctions, it is observed that there is a direct linear relationship between the size of the motor unit and its over-all efficacy of synaptic transmission. Measurements of the effects of changes in calcium concentration on motor unit twitch tension confirmed the last conclusion. Furthermore, this analysis revealed that large motor units, although having a wide range of transmission safety margins, are largely comprised of junctions of uniformly high safety margin. In motor units of smaller size, synaptic strengths become more evenly distributed over a wide range of values. Small motor units had consistently longer twitch rise-times than did larger units. This decrease in rise-time with motor unit size paralleled the decrease in tetanus/twitch ratios, raising questions about the regulation of muscle fibre contraction kinetics.

Full text

PDF
221

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angaut-Petit D., Mallart A. Dual innervation of end-plate sites and its consequences for neuromuscular transmission in muscles of adult Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:203–218. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BULLER A. J., ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M. Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett M. R., McGrath P. A., Davey D. F. The regression of synapses formed by a foreign nerve in a mature axolotl striated muscle. Brain Res. 1979 Sep 21;173(3):451–469. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90241-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett M. R., Raftos J. The formation and regression of synapses during the re-innervation of axolotl striated muscles. J Physiol. 1977 Feb;265(2):261–295. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Betz W. J., Caldwell J. H., Ribchester R. R. The effects of partial denervation at birth on the development of muscle fibres and motor units in rat lumbrical muscle. J Physiol. 1980 Jun;303:265–279. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown M. C., Ironton R. Sprouting and regression of neuromuscular synapses in partially denervated mammalian muscles. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:325–348. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown M. C., Jansen J. K., Van Essen D. Polyneuronal innervation of skeletal muscle in new-born rats and its elimination during maturation. J Physiol. 1976 Oct;261(2):387–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke R. E., Tsairis P. Anatomy and innervation ratios in motor units of cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):749–765. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cass D. T., Sutton T. J., Mark R. F. Competition between nerves for functional connexions with axolotl muscles. Nature. 1973 May 25;243(5404):201–203. doi: 10.1038/243201a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Close R. Dynamic properties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat after nerve cross-union. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):331–346. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dennis M. J., Yip J. W. Formation and elimination of foreign synapses on adult salamander muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Jan;274:299–310. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Genat B. R., Mark R. F. Electrophysiological experiments on the mechanism and accuracy of neuromuscular specificity in the axolotl. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Apr 26;278(961):335–347. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grinnell A. D., Herrera A. A. Physiological regulation of synaptic effectiveness at frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:301–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grinnell A. D., Letinsky M. S., Rheuben M. B. Competitive interaction between foreign nerves innervating frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:241–262. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guth L., Samaha F. J., Albers R. W. The neural regulation of some phenotypic differences between the fiber types of mammalian skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol. 1970 Jan;26(1):126–135. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90094-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HUNT C. C., KUFFLER S. W. Motor innervation of skeletal muscle: multiple innervation of individual muscle fibres and motor unit function. J Physiol. 1954 Nov 29;126(2):293–303. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HUTTER O. F., TRAUTWEIN W. Neuromuscular facilitation by stretch of motor nerve-endings. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):610–625. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haimann C., Mallart A., Ferré J. T., Zilber-Gachelin N. F. Interaction between motor axons from two different nerves reinnervating the pectoral muscle of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:257–272. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haimann C., Mallart A., Ferré J. T., Zilber-Gachelin N. F. Patterns of motor innervation in the pectoral muscle of adult Xenopus laevis: evidence for possible synaptic remodelling. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:241–256. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herrera A. A., Grinnell A. D. Contralateral denervation causes enhanced transmitter release from frog motor nerve terminals. Nature. 1981 Jun 11;291(5815):495–497. doi: 10.1038/291495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Herrera A. A., Grinnell A. D. Transmitter release from frog motor nerve terminals depends on motor unit size. Nature. 1980 Oct 16;287(5783):649–651. doi: 10.1038/287649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hollyday M., Hamburger V. Reduction of the naturally occurring motor neuron loss by enlargement of the periphery. J Comp Neurol. 1976 Dec 1;170(3):311–320. doi: 10.1002/cne.901700304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. IWASAKI S. Mononeuronal double innervation of an amphibian striated muscle fibre. Jpn J Physiol. 1957 Dec 20;7(4):267–275. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.7.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuno M., Turkanis S. A., Weakly J. N. Correlation between nerve terminal size and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(3):545–556. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lomo T., Westgaard R. H., Dahl H. A. Contractile properties of muscle: control by pattern of muscle activity in the rat. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Aug 27;187(1086):99–103. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1974.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luff A. R., Proske U. Properties of motor units of the frog iliofibularis muscle. Am J Physiol. 1979 Jan;236(1):C35–C40. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1979.236.1.C35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luff A. R., Proske U. Properties of motor units of the frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jul;258(3):673–685. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mark R. F. Synaptic repression at neuromuscular junctions. Physiol Rev. 1980 Apr;60(2):355–395. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nemeth P. M., Pette D., Vrbová G. Comparison of enzyme activities among single muscle fibres within defined motor units. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:489–495. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nudell B. M., Grinnell A. D. Inverse relationship between transmitter release and terminal length in synapses on frog muscle fibers of uniform input resistance. J Neurosci. 1982 Feb;2(2):216–224. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-02-00216.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. ORKAND R. K. A further study of electrical responses in slow and twitch muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1963 Jun;167:181–191. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Oppenheim R. W. Cell death of motoneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord. V. Evidence on the role of cell death and neuromuscular function in the formation of specific peripheral connections. J Neurosci. 1981 Feb;1(2):141–151. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-02-00141.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ridge R. M., Thomson A. M. Electrical responses of muscle fibres in a small foot muscle of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:41–49. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ridge R. M., Thomson A. M. Polyneural innervation: mechanical properties of overlapping motor units in a small foot muscle of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:29–39. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ridge R. M., Thomson A. M. Properties of motor units in a small foot muscle of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:17–27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith R. S., Lännergren J. Types of motor units in the skeletal muscle of Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1968 Jan 20;217(5125):281–283. doi: 10.1038/217281a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson W., Jansen J. K. The extent of sprouting of remaining motor units in partly denervated immature and adult rat soleus muscle. Neuroscience. 1977;2(4):523–535. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(77)90049-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Turkanis S. A. Effects of muscle stretch on transmitter release at end-plates of rat diaphragm and frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1973 Apr;230(2):391–403. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wigston D. J. Suppression of sprouted synapses in axolotl muscle by transplanted foreign nerves. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:355–366. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES