Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable and efficient chicken production has intensified the interest in functional feed additives such as probiotics. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum) is an important probiotic bacterium that has become an essential component in poultry nutrition owing to its diverse advantages. This bacterium improves gut health by regulating the intestinal microbiota, increasing food absorption, and strengthening the immune system. It also alleviates the detrimental impacts of pathogenic bacteria, thereby reducing the reliance on antibiotics and promoting antibiotic-free poultry production. Additionally, Lactobacillus plantarum enhances growth performance, feed conversion efficiency, and total flock productivity. Adding Lactobacillus plantarum to chicken feed helps the gut microbiota by encouraging good bacterial communities (e.g., Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, Ligilactobacillus, Limosilactobacillus, Blautia and Clostridium). This leads to increased growth in chickens and helps maintain the balance of their gut flora. Lactobacillus plantarum has been extensively investigated as a potential feed additive to replace in-feed antibiotics. Published literature have revealed that a dietary additive of Lactobacillus plantarum improved the health and growth of broilers by improving the balance of bacteria and the metabolism of nutrients in the gut. This study explores the incorporation of Lactobacillus plantarum into poultry diets and its importance in sustainable and healthy poultry production. This study will encourage poultry scientists to investigate further before encapsulation. Innovations in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, including its intestine colonization methods and novel strategies to improve its colonization, have the potential to transform the industry. Rapid development of tools and techniques (microencapsulated, nanotechnology, metagenomics, and transcriptome for L. plantarum) could help cover research and application shortages.
Keywords: Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Alternatives to antibiotics, Gut microbiota, Encapsulation, Poultry
Introduction
The prolonged use and widespread misuse of antibiotics lead to critical issues, including diminished animal immunity, increased risk of secondary infections, the presence of antibiotic residues in animal products. These problems pose significant hazards to the safety of animal products and human well-being (Betancur et al., 2020; Parent et al., 2020; Saeed et al., 2023). Historically, feed additives like antibiotics were considered essential for the development of broiler chickens (Khalique et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2024). However, the continued use of antibiotics, on the other hand, subsequently results in the accumulation of microorganisms resistant to several drugs, disruption of gastrointestinal microbial equilibrium, and the presence of pharmaceutical remnants (antibiotic residues) in animal byproducts (He et al., 2022).
To maintain healthy poultry farms and promote faster growth in the birds, there is a need for an alternative to drugs that works well and is safe. Probiotics, which are live bacteria that are not dangerous, have been proven to improve the health of people and animals when administered in adequate amounts (Montoro et al., 2016; Sornplang and Piyadeatsoontorn, 2016). The name “probiotic” is derived from the Greek words pro, meaning favor, and bios, meaning life (Chauhan et al., 2016).
Probiotics were recently established as a safe and effective dietary approach for enhancing growth and reducing gastrointestinal disorders (Al-Khalaifa et al., 2019; Al-Yami et al., 2022). Probiotics have been shown to boost growth performance and immunity in animals such as yaks, dogs, and mice. This is accomplished by maintaining the balance of the gut microbiota and encouraging the synthesis of organic acids, antagonistic factors, and digesting enzymes to improve the immune system (Gareau et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023; 2022).
Among probiotics, Lactobacillus species represent a widely used vital category that thrive in many nutrient-rich environments. Lactobacillus plantarum belongs to the facultative, heterofermentative species of Lactobacilli. Several studies have focused on the effectiveness of L. plantarum when fed to broilers (Hong et al., 2012; Murry et al., 2006). As one of the most adaptable types of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Lactobacillus plantarum is capable of growing in human gastrointestinal tracts that are healthy, as well as in dairy products, meat, and diverse vegetable fermentations.(De Vries et al., 2006).
Peng et al. (2016) discovered that providing broilers with nutritional supplements of L. plantarum B1 improved their performance and reduced the amount of E. coli present in their cecum under normal rearing conditions Yin et al. (2023) found that Lactobacillus plantarum GX17 provided multiple benefits for regulating immune in yellow-feathered broilers. Similarly, van den Nieuwboer et al. (2016) noted the high survival rate of Lactobacillus plantarum and its ability to modulate the immune system (van den Nieuwboer et al., 2016). Conversely, Lactobacillus plantarum was demonstrated to effectively inhibit pathogen invasion (Mohanty et al., 2019). Collectively, these results validate the significant growth and health benefits of Lactobacillus plantarum.
A comprehensive understanding of Lactobacillus plantarum as a probiotic is essential for creating efficient feed additives and optimizing nutritional management. Millions of bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals play a vital role maintaining homeostasis and overall health (Ghosh et al., 2021). By enhancing intestinal metabolism and gut microbiota balance, Lactobacillus plantarum has been shown to enhance the development and health of broiler chickens, indicating the potential of Lactobacillus plantarum as a dietary additive to boost broiler chicken growth (Wang et al., 2024). Furthermore, L. plantarum JM113 improved gut digestion, absorption, and metabolic processes when challenged with deoxynivalenol (DON) by lowering intestinal barrier injury and boosting the population of beneficial bacteria in broiler chickens (Wu et al., 2018).
Awad et al. (2009) discovered that adding Lactobacillus to broiler diets increased villus height and the ratio of the villus height to the crypt depth in the duodenum, while simultaneously decreasing the depth of the ileal crypt (Awad et al., 2009). Several other studies have demonstrated that due to their ability to stimulate growth, multi-strain Lactobacillus supplements have the potential to be utilized as probiotics in industrial chicken production (Gheorghe et al., 2018; Lokapirnasari et al., 2020). Qiao et al. (2019) demonstrated how L. plantarum might modify metabolic processes and nutrition use by controlling the gut microbiota Of the broilers. Another study verified that broiler productivity, immunological response, and intestinal microecological balance increased when L. plantarum was added as a feed supplement (Shen et al., 2014).
Numerous studies have shown that supplementing animal feed with Lactobacillus plantarum can help restore a healthy microbiome in the intestines, increase the feed conversion efficiency, enhance the immune system, and facilitate the digestion and assimilation of nutrients, all of which contribute to the growth of livestock and poultry (Blajman et al., 2017; De Souza et al., 2018). L. plantarum has garnered significant interest from farmers due to its potential as a drug-resistant, residue-free, and environmentally benign microbial additive. It is classified within the genus of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (Stiles and Holzapfel, 1997).
In comparison with other LAB, L. plantarum is capable of synthesizing distinctive lactic acid bacteriocins throughout its reproductive phase (Pieper et al., 2009; Zeng et al., 2021; Additives et al., 2017; Pieper et al., 2009). Furthermore, L. plantarum is widely used in both human and animal feed and is considered one of the safest species (Kanmani et al., 2013).
The aforementioned literature indicates that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is one of the best possible substitutes for antibiotic growth promoters (AGP). It enhances intestine histomorphology, immunological response, nutritional digestibility, growth performance, and meat quality in poultry. Nevertheless, the use of L. plantarum in chicken diets remains relatively unexplored, and little research has been done on the effects of its fermentation products on various poultry species.
Bioactivities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
The probiotic, antimicrobial, indigenous gut modulation, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum render them a valuable element in poultry production. L. plantarum strains can live in different environments, such as the human gut, vegetables, meat, fish, dairy, and other fermented foods (Yilmaz et al., 2022) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
It is showing the different benefits of Lb. plantarum and its different strains (Yilmaz et al., 2022).
Possible roles and probiotic properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
Literature indicates that L. plantarum strains possess numerous functional qualities, including enhancement of nutritional quality and taste, antioxidant and antibacterial effects, and extension of food shelf life, and the reduction of unwanted chemicals (Yilmaz et al., 2022). The European Food Safety Authorities (EFSA) has granted L. plantarum a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) status, which means that it is safe for consumption. Similarly, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has classified L. plantarum as "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS) (Hazards et al., 2017).
L. plantarum, a prominent member of the lactobacilli genus, is widely used as a probiotic due to its beneficial features, including antioxidants, GI tolerance, adhesion, and antibacterial activities. Although previous research concentrated on isolating probiotic strains and bioactive metabolites of L. plantarum, current research explores their application in food industry and their adaptation to environmental stress (Huang et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2022a; Patil et al., 2020). Recent studies have highlighted the probiotic potential of L. plantarum strains isolated from fermented foods (Pan et al., 2021).The biological and probiotic qualities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains taken from fermented foods are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
The biological and probiotic qualities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum’ strains that were taken from fermented foods.
| Foods that ferment | Isolated L. plantarum strains | Probiotic activities | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pickles food | Wikim0112 and KACC11451 | Excellent intestinal epithelial adhesion (60-62 %) and pathogen inhibition. High antioxidant ability (more than 70 % activity, comparable to superoxide dismutase) | (Jeong et al., 2021) |
| Kimchi food | L. plantarum LRCC5314 | This strain is very constant and can live in bile acid (0.2 %) and low pH (=2.0). It sticks to Caco-2 cells 89.9 % of the time. | (Yoon et al., 2021) |
| Dhokla batter food | Lactiplantibacillus plantarum’ DKL3 and JGR2 | It is capable of effectively absorbing acid and bile and adhering to the epithelial cells of the intestine. It also produces exopolysaccharides, folate, and riboflavin. | (Surve et al., 2022) |
| Kimchi food | Lactiplantibacillus plantarum’ strains | LRCC5193 of L. plantarum demonstrated high-stress tolerance. | (Lim et al., 2018) |
| Fermented Paocai | Lactiplantibacillus plantarum’ DMDL 9010 | Good tolerance in the digestive tract, as well as antioxidant and antibacterial effects. | (Liu et al., 2022a) |
| Traditional cheese from Algeria called "Jben" | SJ14 | Good resistance to bile and acid, good intestinal cell adhesion, antibacterial activity against opportunistic and pathogenic microbes, and antifungal activity. | (Metrouh et al., 2022) |
| Theobroma cacao | Lactiplantibacillus plantarum’ Lp03, Lp289, and Lp291 | Every strain was heat-tolerant, low-pH, antibacterial, and generated hydrogen peroxide. | (das Neves Selis et al., 2021) |
Antimicrobial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
According to research, L. plantarum is capable of producing a wide range of antimicrobial chemicals, including bacteriocin, hydrogen peroxide, and acids (Siamansouri et al., 2013). Numerous studies have reported that during its fermentative metabolism, L. plantarum generates many antimicrobial chemicals (in addition to bacteriocins). These may organic acids such as lactic, citric, isobutyric, and acetic acids, as well as ethanol, diacetyl, and H2O (Liu et al., 2022b; Markkinen et al., 2022).
One study examined the antibacterial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains APsulloc 331261 and APsulloc 331266. The findings showed that these strains of L. plantarum may enhance the balance of the skin microbiota by suppressing skin pathogenic strains (Chae et al., 2021). The production of bacteriocins and the inhibitory action of the pig-isolated L. plantarum LP5 strain against the STEC EDL933 strain indicate its potential as a probiotic (Ruiz et al., 2023). Three distinct strains of Lb. plantarum—LP1, LP2, and LP3—demonstrated excellent antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (Arena et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018). Additionally, certain studies have reported the antibacterial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains against pathogenic microorganisms found in food.
Based on these results, L. plantarum should be promoted as a possible bio-control method against pathogenic microorganisms in both food and feed industries. L plantarum is not only a more environmentally friendly choice (it can be used instead of artificial antibacterials) but it also holds significant potential for the making of functional foods.
Antioxidant activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
Given the significance of oxidation processes, many studies have evaluated the antioxidant ability of L. plantarum, with favorable results. Using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay and the superoxide anion (O2-) scavenging activity method, several researchers have shown that L. plantarum DMDL 9010 possesses excellent antioxidant capacity, with the supernatants exhibiting a higher antioxidant capacity compared to the bacterial precipitates (Liu et al., 2022a, b; Shu et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2017).
In contrast, Tian et al. (2022) discovered that, using the DPPH assay and reducing power, the extracts derived from cell-free L. plantarum N-1 showed lower antioxidant ability than those with bacterial cells. This implies that the intact cells of L. plantarum N-1 contain antioxidant chemicals. Despite this difference, both extracts demonstrated impressive antioxidant potential, surpassing that of other probiotic strains.
Furthermore, Jeong et al. (2021) demonstrated that L. plantarum Wikim0112 and KACC11451 exhibited over 70 % activity comparable to that of superoxide dismutase (SOD). Using the DPPH and ABTS assays, the Wikim0112 strain was exhibited to have the highest antioxidant capacity. Similarly, L. plantarum KU15149 showed a high concentration of antioxidants, as measured by DPPH assay and β-carotene bleaching inhibition (Han et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2008; Park et al., 2014).
Using the cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) tests, Tang et al. (2018) discovered that L. plantarum MA2 has a high antioxidant capacity in the cell-free extract of the logarithmic phase, compared to the stationary phase and the fermentation supernatant. The authors revealed that intracellular antioxidant enzymes—such as catalase, feruloyl esterase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, glutathione transferase, NADH oxidase, and superoxide dismutase—and non-enzymatic compounds were shown to be responsible for the antioxidant capacity of cell-free extract (Lin et al., 2020; Mu et al., 2018).
Resistance to gastrointestinal activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
Recent research on Lactiplantibacillus plantarum PMO08, isolated from kimchi, have shown that it may improve cholesterol metabolism, immunological response, and gastrointestinal health (Oh et al., 2022). In this adverse environment, various strains of L. plantarum have demonstrated probiotic potential owing to their tolerance to pH and bile. This resilience is achieved through strategies including the preservation of intracellular pH homeostasis, swift recycling of damaged proteins, and activation of multiple stress response pathways, induction of bile salt hydrolase, and the maintenance of the proton motive force (Fidanza et al., 2021). The L. plantarum MA2 and B23 strains demonstrated significant tolerance and were capable of enduring pH levels as low as 2.5–3 (Tang et al., 2018).
Nath et al. (2020) similarly demonstrated that L. plantarum GCC_19M1 exhibited considerable tolerance to low pH environments, with survival rates ranging between 93.48 % and 96.97 % when subjected to simulated gastric juice (pH=3). Furthermore, L. plantarum GCC_19M1 showed significant resistance to 0.3 % bile, 0.5 % pancreatin, and 5 % NaCl. L. plantarum SJ14 showed notable resistance to conditions of the human gastrointestinal system that resembled bile-like acidity. Strains of L. plantarum isolated from pickles and kimchi (KACC11451 and Wikim0112, respectively) showed extraordinary resistance to gastrointestinal environment (Liu et al., 2022a; Metrouh et al., 2022).
Supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8 may promote growth and reduce stress in weaned piglets without antibiotics by changing their gut flora. This supplementation significantly decreased ADFI, FCR, and ileal mucosal crypt depth while boosting villus height-to-crypt depth ratio, hepatic glutathione peroxidase and catalase activity, and serum interleukin. Antibiotics and probiotics affected the gut microbiomes of the piglets (Yu et al., 2024).
L. plantarum MCC5231 was found to produce exopolysaccharides and biofilms, which may protect the gut. These data suggest that L. plantarum MCC5231 is a safe probiotic option for food and feed industries (Goel and Halami, 2024).
Anti-inflammatory activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
L. plantarum A7 exhibited an anti-inflammatory effect by altering the distribution of CD4 + T-cell subsets, hence facilitating Th2 differentiation and suppressing Th1 differentiation (Salehipour et al., 2017). Similarly, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IDCC 3501, isolated from kimchi, was tested for safety and anti-inflammatory efficacy. LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages treated with L. plantarum IDCC 3501 cell-free supernatant resulted in considerable reduction in the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) (Yang et al., 2021).
Another study thoroughly investigated the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A106, isolated from traditional Chinese pickles, on LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages. These findings indicate that L. plantarum A106 regulates inflammatory and apoptosis-related gene expression, thereby restoring mitochondrial membrane potential and enhancing antioxidant activity (Qin et al., 2024). Probiotics (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) have demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties by obstructing the activation of MAPKs and NF-κB (Cristofori et al., 2021). Although several studies have illustrated the advantageous benefits of probiotics and their capacity to influence the immune system, hence offering anti-inflammatory properties, the underlying mechanisms of action of these bacteria remains largely unexplored (Vincenzi et al., 2021). Consequently, all potential processes and innovative approaches for inflammation reduction are of significant interest.
In conclusion, L. plantarum Z22, isolated from naturally fermented vegetables, has anti-inflammatory properties that holds potential to prevent and treat inflammatory diseases. It can also be used to develop nutritional supplements to meet the demand for anti-inflammation and immune enhancement (Wang et al., 2024). Animal studies and clinical trials have indicated the health benefits associated with L. plantarum supplementation, especially in relation to gastrointestinal and inflammatory conditions (Fidanza et al., 2021). Future research must examine its in vivo safety and efficacy to ensure its continued use.
Immunomodulatory activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
L. plantarum has demonstrated significant immunomodulatory effects through the regulation of gut microbiota, potentially reducing the risk of many diseases (Bu et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2023). The effectiveness of the immune system is based on the reliable transmission of specific, functioning proteins. L. plantarum has an exceptional capacity to elicit immunological responses, according to an examination of its functional genes (Liu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019). Certain probiotic strains of L. plantarum may serve as effective immunomodulators that modulate the Th1/Th2 balance and elicit advantageous immune responses (Kawashima et al., 2011; Smelt et al., 2012). One such strain is L. plantarum, which aids in the prevention of Th2-associated immunological disorders.
In vitro studies have proven that the production of pivotal polarized cytokines, IL-12 and IL-10, by dendritic cells (DCs) was augmented in the presence of L. plantarum NCIMB8826, thereby skewing the T-cell response towards advantageous Th1 profiles (Hisbergues et al., 2007; Pochard et al., 2005; Rigaux et al., 2009). In another study, supplementation of Aflatoxin B1 diet with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum significantly reduced immune-inflammatory gene expression (Nrf2, IL-10, and BCL-2) and apoptotic gene CASP3. This study suggests that L. plantarum (1 × 109 cfu/g/kg diet) may protect rabbits from Aflatoxin B1 by boosting antioxidant and immunological activity, while lowering apoptosis and inflammation (Saghir et al., 2024).
Supplementing poultry diet with probiotics may produce the following effects: (1) changing the gut microbiome; (2) strengthening the immune system in chickens (Jha et al., 2020). Bacillus probiotics have gained increasing attention as an alternative to antibiotics growth promoters (AGPs) due to their health-enhancing properties and resilience to the rigorous industrial conditions of poultry feed production (Grant et al., 2018). When used as feed supplements, probiotics facilitate optimal feed digestion, thereby enhancing nutrient availability for accelerated growth. In addition to enhancing immunity in poultry, probiotics enhance the qualitative characteristics of meat and eggs (Alagawany et al., 2018). One study shows that L. chiayiensis AACE3 is a great feed additive that can serve as an alternative to aureomycin. It also helps chickens grow healthy during the brooding period by positively influencing their gut microbiome (Kang et al., 2023).
Antibacterial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus plantarum demonstrated inhibitory effects against several pathogenic bacteria, including Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, E-coli, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (Chen et al., 2017; Zang et al., 2024). Enzymes, proteins, peptides, fatty acids, and bacteriocins, exemplify postbiotic entities with antibacterial properties. Additional examples include organic acids and hydrogen peroxide (Aghebati-Maleki et al., 2021). Bacteriocins, in particular, are ribosomally generated antimicrobial peptides that suppress or eliminate bacterial strains, both closely related or unrelated, without harming the producing bacteria due to the presence of self-defensive proteins (Vogel et al., 1993; Yang et al., 2014).
Microbe fermentation produces cell-free supernatants (CFS), which contain microbial metabolites and nutrients from the growth medium they did not ingest. Lactobacillus CFS may exhibit antibacterial properties due to the presence of fatty acids, proteinaceous polymers, and organic acids. CFS from Lactobacillus is antimicrobial due to lactic acid, acetic acid, and other compounds (Mani‐López et al., 2022). Bacteriocins present in these supernatants offer multiple benefits, such as inhibiting the emergence and proliferation of pathogenic bacteria, spore formation, and the creation of pores in the cell membranes of pathogens (O'Connor et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2023).
Fatty acids can inhibit the growth of bacteria through several mechanisms, including the modification of the morphology and function of sensitive components such as proteins, the enhancement of membrane permeability and subsequent cell lysis, the disintegration of the electron transport chain, the interference with the structure as well as the function of enzymes, and the disruption of the electron transport chain (Ababouch et al., 1992; Yoon et al., 2018). Peptides work against bacteria by creating pores in cells, causing leakage of cell contents, damaging tiny microbe parts inside them, triggering potentially fatal processes such as hydrolase production that damage cell walls, and increasing the acidity of the cell membrane of bacteria (Isaac-Bamgboye et al., 2024; Zasloff, 2002). Certain metabolites of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum also work against bacteria in the gut, inhibiting division of the bacteria (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Certain metabolites of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum work against bacteria in the gut, stopping the bacteria from dividing (Antibacterial activity).
Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum supplementation on poultry production
Since antibiotics are banned as growth promoters, many probiotics have been developed as alternatives. Numerous studies have shown that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum enhances intestinal health; however, further research is needed to determine its in replacing antibiotics as a broiler feed growth booster. L. plantarum has potential as an alternative to antibiotics in poultry nutrition (Salim et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2016). Alongside Lactobacillus spp., many species of Enterococcus spp. have been recognized as effective probiotics for poultry. For instance, the Enterococcus faecium boosts blood parameters and improves hatchability, growth performance, and intestinal morphology in broilers (Wu et al., 2019). Lactobacillus plantarum may have numerous effects on poultry health and production, as illustrated in Fig. 3.
Fig 3.
A beneficial benefits of Lactobacillus plantarum in poultry.
Effects on broiler growth performance and meat quality
Broiler chicken diets supplemented with a Lactobacillus plantarum metabolite has been proven to lower cholesterol levels in the plasma and breast meat (Loh et al., 2013). The research study sought to examine the effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) on growth performance, oxidative resistance, immunity, and cecal microbiota in broilers. The results indicated that L. plantarum supplementation significantly enhanced average daily weight gain (ADWG) (p < 0.05) and decreased the feed-to-gain ratio throughout the supplementation period (p < 0.05). The best L. plantarum dosage depends on the strain, dosing technique, and desired results. Supplementation with L. plantarum HJLP-1 at an amount of 5 × 10⁸ CFU/kg of feed enhanced average daily weight gain and feed conversion ratios in broilers over a 42–day period (Yang et al., 2024). Similarly, supplementation of at 2.6 × 10⁹ CFU/g of feed, enhanced growth, meat quality, and intestinal health in broilers over six weeks (Liu et al., 2023). Research suggests that dosages of L. plantarum for poultry nutrition should range from 5 × 10⁴ to 2.6 × 10⁹ CFU per kilogram of feed per chicken. However, strain, delivery route, and production goals must be considered while selecting dosage.
Feeding L. plantarum to broiler chickens has the potential to enhance growth performance, support gut microbial balance, help prevent pathogen infections, and mitigate intestinal barrier damage caused by toxins (Markkinen et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2018). Lactoplantibacillus plantarum has been demonstrated to support growth in broiler (Deepthi et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2017; Peng et al., 2016).
A study investigating the effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in broiler breast meat found that adding Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P8 to the diet of oxidatively stressed broilers reduced oxidative stress, enhanced mitophagy, and inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation (Yuan et al., 2023). The supplementation of L. plantarum postbiotic can serve as an effective alternative to antibiotic growth promoters as it enhances growth performance, mucin production, tight junction permeability, and immunological status in broiler chickens by improving gut health and promoting beneficial bacterial colonization (Chang et al., 2022).
Three probiotic strains—Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus AG16, Limosilactobacillus fermentum HFD1, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LS-4.4—have been proven to have an impact on the quality of quail meat. All three strains reduced breast meat water retention capacity and cooking loss relative to the control group in quail. Probiotic Lactobacilli made quail flesh less stiff, thereby reducing the chewing and cutting effort (Tsyganov et al., 2023). Additionally, there has been a drop in cholesteryl ester and a rise in very low-density lipoprotein particles. The ability to deconjugate bile salts also gets better by increasing the amount of Lactobacillus in the small intestine digesta. The cholesterol-lowering effect observed in chicken meat can be linked to the growth of microfloral Lactobacillus, which accelerates bile acid catabolism of cholesterol. Also, administration of postbiotic L. Plantarum RG14, L. plantarum RI11, and inulin in broiler chicken resulted in lower drip loss and enhanced breast muscle lightness (Kareem et al., 2015).
Effect on egg production
Supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 18 resulted in higher laying rates (p < 0.05) and enhanced egg quality, including shape index, albumen height, Haugh unit, and eggshell strength (p < 0.05), as along with notable increase in ultrastructure (Fig. 4). The findings shed light on the genomics of LP18 and the genes responsible for its survival and colonization in the gut. This study shows that LP18 holds potential as a probiotic to improve poultry productivity, egg quality, and lipid metabolism (Zhang et al., 2023).
Fig. 4.
Promising bioactivities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on egg qualities.
The three strains of L. plantarum (COM456) that produced 0.6 % liquid metabolite combinations were RI11, RG11, and RG14, which demonstrated the most significant improvement in the egg production of the hens (Choe et al., 2012). After adding metabolites to the meal, there was a marked reduction in the amount of cholesterol found in the egg yolks. The reason behind this reduction is the ability of Lactobacillus, an intestinal bacterium, to deconjugate bile salts, thereby reducing the cholesterol available for integration into lipoproteins.
Oocyte vitellogenesis receptors allow very low-density lipoproteins to transport blood cholesterol across ovarian membranes and deposit it into the developing yolk (Elkin and Lorenz, 2009). According to an experiment on the effects of supplementing diet of laying hens with postbiotic COM456 at 0.6 %, the metabolite combinations led to an increase in hen-day egg output and egg mass (Lee et al., 2009).
Effect on intestinal barrier integrity and gut pathogens
Chickens have a large microbial population in their gastrointestinal tract (GIT), which helps with nutrition absorption, immunology, and disease resistance (1). Changes in the GIT microbiota can affect feed efficiency, production, and health of poultry (Jeurissen et al., 2002). Postbiotics function by boosting LAB populations and improving intestinal shape, thereby reducing the risk of villi damage caused by gut pathogens (Svetoch et al., 2011).
The probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP) is widely used in poultry production. Recent research has indicated that its postbiotics—comprising bacterial components and metabolites—improve nutrition intake, immunological response, and gut microbiota, thus promoting poultry product growth and quality (Chang et al., 2022; Danladi et al., 2022). Lactobacillus has demonstrated beneficial impacts on broiler performance, modification of the gut microbiome, and suppression of infections through multiple mechanisms, including competitive exclusion, organic acid generation, and synthesis of antimicrobial compounds (Krysiak et al., 2021; Neal-McKinney et al., 2012). Supplementation with L. plantarum has been shown to modify the composition of gut microbiota composition by enhancing beneficial bacteria and reducing dangerous strains. This modulation fosters a healthy microbial equilibrium, crucial for optimal gastrointestinal function and defense against infections (Hao et al., 2024). These various mechanisms show that L. plantarum could be used as a probiotic to improve the integrity of the intestinal barrier and protect against gut pathogens, which would improve overall gut health.
The probiotic potential and antibacterial activities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum were examined against Salmonella typhimurium, and Escherichia coli(O157:H7). The findings showed that B. longum and L. plantarum have probiotic potential for managing E. coli O157:H7 in poultry (Igbafe et al., 2020). Lactobacillus species can produce and secrete antimicrobial chemicals such as Bacteriocins and volatile fatty acids (VFAs). These substances create an unfavorable environment for the growth of dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella and E. coli. The VFAs reduce the pH and inhibit the viability of Enterobacteriaceae, promoting gut health (Reid, 2001). Furthermore, the reduction of pathogens in intestine by metabolite combination increases the ability of Lactobacillus to colonize the gut microbiota through competitive exclusion.
Another factor that reduces these Enterobacteriaceae is the bacteriostatic effects of VFA in caeca (van der Wielen et al., 2000). The antimicrobial effects of postbiotics are primarily attributed to bacteriocins and SCFAs, as per (Aguilar-Toalá et al., 2018). Maltol also is a promising postbiotic substitute for antibiotics for enhancing the growth and immunity of poultry that exhibit gastrointestinal illnesses (Park et al., 2021). The expansion of Lactobacillus populations while diminishing the prevalence of gram-negative bacteria (Eddula, 2022). The postbiotics derived from L. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum increase the growth and intestinal health of chickens by reducing the number of harmful microorganisms in their intestine, leading to better performance.
Published literature has reported that antimicrobial metabolites in L. plantarum, including organic acids and bacteriocins, can increase tight junction permeability, decrease gut pH, and inhibit the growth of opportunistic infections in poultry. These metabolites can support colonization of beneficial bacteria and improve overall gut health and gastrointestinal function of poultry (Fig. 5). Consequently, they influence the local environment or modify the gene expression of the host. The effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on poultry health and performance are summarized in Table 2.
Fig. 5.
The potential effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on intestinal barrier integrity and gut pathogens in chicken.
Table 2.
Effects of lactiplantibacillus plantarum on poultry health and performance.
| lactiplantibacillus plantarum's strain | Species | Bioactivities | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RG11 and its strains (RG14, RS5 and RI11) | Broilers | RI11 could reduce Salmonella, ENT, and E. coli numbers in chicken and be an alternative antibiotic growth booster and anti-stress medication. | (Humam et al., 2019) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RS5 | Layer birds | Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RS5 enhanced growth and reduce heat stress. It greatly enhanced egg production | (Farran et al., 2024) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | Layer birds | Significantly increased in small intestine villi height | (Choe et al., 2012) |
| Lactiplantibacillus acidophilus | Broilers | Reduction in Coliform count | (Abd El-Ghany et al., 2022) |
| Lactiplantibacillus animalis | Quails | It substantially reduced E. coli and it is as feed additives that may replace antibiotic growth boosters in quail diet. | (Kareem, 2020) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | Broilers | Increased in villi height in duodenum, jejunum and ileum and demonstrated that 0.2 % is the optimal broiler food amount to substitute antibiotic growth boosters. | (Loh et al., 2010) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | Broiler chicks | Lactoplantibacillus plantarum 0.1 % supplement improved growth performance, mucin synthesis, immunological status, tight junction permeability, gut health. | (Chang et al., 2022) |
| L. plantarum RG14 and RI11 | Broilers chicken | Adding Lactiplantibacillus strains made a big difference. The number of Enterobacteriaceae in broilers dropped. | (Kareem et al., 2016) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | Broilers chicken | The incorporation of a metabolite combination supplement also enhanced the population of faecal lactic acid bacteria, increased intestine villus height. | (Thanh et al., 2009) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | Broilers chicken | Lactoplantibacillus plantarum had the reduction of harmful microbes while enhancing helpful microbes. | (Danladi et al., 2022) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum | Broilers chicken | The observed favorable alteration of the microbiota is particularly significant, as the incorporation of these alternative nutrients may enhance the gut health of broilers. | (Ferrocino et al., 2023) |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FRT4 | laying hens | Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp. plantarum) boosted laying rate and reduced liver lipid buildup. | (Li et al., 2024) |
A promising new potential interventions in future
By delving further into Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, scientists will be able to better understand its mechanisms for combating pathobionts and develop novel pharmabiotics and pharmacological methods that are less invasive and produce more targeted physiological effects (Tomar et al., 2015). Although many alternative approaches have shown favorable effects, they are often considered as lacking consistency and producing variable results from farm to farm. Additionally, their operation is yet to be sufficiently explained. As antibiotic use in poultry industry is being reduced, maximizing performance and preserving animal output will depend on identifying the optimum combinations of various alternatives and proper management and husbandry practices (Gadde et al., 2017).
The potential benefits of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum range from improved chicken productivity, gut health, meat quality, and immunity make them essential for safe and sustainable poultry farming worldwide. If their specific characterization and mechanism of action are better understood, these biomolecules will be highly useful in poultry. This requires extensive research on these compounds to prove their health benefits in poultry, especially given the growing danger of AMR worldwide. The effectiveness of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum from various sources needs to be demonstrated in several disease models, such as colibacillosis, necrotic enteritis, and coccidiosis, which can affect the financial viability of poultry farming.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum may help reduce heat-stress in fast-growing broilers and improve their respiratory health due to its antioxidant properties. Most investigations focus on Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as native AGP replacements, and nanotechnology is expected to boost their cellular bioavailability. Microencapsulation protects Lactiplantibacillus plantarum against proventriculus and gut environmental hazards such acidity, bile salts, chemicals, antimicrobials, active oxygen (for anaerobic bacteria). The application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in poultry is predicted to expand significantly with more preclinical trials by using metagenomics and transcriptomics, which will help understand how stresses affect chicken signaling networks. Microencapsulation has been suggested as one of the most effective approaches as shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum supports the poultry industry through tools like metagenomics and transcriptomics and encapsulation. It highlights the key benefits, such as improved gut health, disease resistance, and growth.
Conclusion
Since antibiotics are banned as growth promoters, many probiotics have been developed as alternatives. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum), a prevalent strain of LAB, has demonstrated probiotic properties. In the past, L. plantarum has demonstrated beneficial benefits on broiler performance, gut microbiota modulation, pathogen suppression, anti-heat stressor properties, making it a promising candidate as an antibiotic substitute for major commercial applications in the chicken industry. A number of harmful bacteria, such as Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, are inhibited by Lactobacillus plantarum.
The aforementioned studies have demonstrated the potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) as feed additives to enhance the antioxidant content and meat quality of poultry. These findings highlight the necessity to promote L. plantarum as an effective biocontrol tool in the feed industry. L. plantarum provides a sustainable alternative to synthetic antibacterial agents and has considerable potential in chicken feed production. L. plantarum strains can be efficient antibacterials and help address poultry medication resistance. However, further research is required to evaluate if Lactiplantibacillus plantarum can fully replace antibiotics as a broiler feed growth booster, and to determine its mode of action and optimal poultry husbandry dosage. The encapsulation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as poultry feed additive represents a promising strategy in poultry industry.
Disclosures
The authors say they don't have any known personal or financial relationships or financial interests that could have seemed to affect the work in this study.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely appreciate the financial support from the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research.
References
- Ababouch L., Chaibi A., Busta F.F. Inhibition of bacterial spore growth by fatty acids and their sodium salts. J. Food Prot. 1992;55(12):980–984. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-55.12.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abd El-Ghany W.A., Abdel-Latif M.A., Hosny F., Alatfeehy N.M., Noreldin A.E., Quesnell R.R., Chapman R., Sakai L., Elbestawy A.R. Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2022;101(8):101988. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aghebati-Maleki L., Hasannezhad P., Abbasi A., Khani N. Antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, and anticancer activities of postbiotics: a review of mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021;12(2):2629–2645. [Google Scholar]
- Aguilar-Toalá J., Garcia-Varela R., Garcia H., Mata-Haro V., González-Córdova A., Vallejo-Cordoba B., Hernández-Mendoza A. Postbiotics: an evolving term within the functional foods field. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;75:105–114. [Google Scholar]
- Alagawany M., Abd El-Hack M.E., Farag M.R., Sachan S., Karthik K., Dhama K. The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:10611–10618. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Khalaifa H., Al-Nasser A., Al-Surayee T., Al-Kandari S., Al-Enzi N., Al-Sharrah T., Mohammed A. Effect of dietary probiotics and prebiotics on the performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019;98(10):4465–4479. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Yami A.M., Al-Mousa A.T., Al-Otaibi S.A., Khalifa A.Y. Lactobacillus species as probiotics: isolation sources and health benefits. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2022;16:2270–2291. [Google Scholar]
- Arena M.P., Silvain A., Normanno G., Grieco F., Drider D., Spano G., Fiocco D. Use of Lactobacillus plantarum strains as a bio-control strategy against food-borne pathogenic microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:464. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Awad W., Ghareeb K., Abdel-Raheem S., Böhm J. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2009;88(1):49–56. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Betancur C., Martínez Y., Merino-Guzman R., Hernandez-Velasco X., Castillo R., Rodríguez R., Tellez-Isaias G. Evaluation of oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 strain as an alternative to antibiotics in weaned pigs. Animals. 2020;10(7):1218. doi: 10.3390/ani10071218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blajman J.E., Olivero C., Fusari M.L., Zimmermann J.A., Rossler E., Berisvil A.P., Signorini M. Impact of lyophilized Lactobacillus salivarius DSPV 001P administration on growth performance, microbial translocation, and gastrointestinal microbiota of broilers reared under low ambient temperature. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017;114:388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bu Y., Liu Y., Zhang T., Liu Y., Zhang Z., Yi H. Bacteriocin-producing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YRL45 enhances intestinal immunity and regulates gut microbiota in mice. Nutrients. 2023;15(15):3437. doi: 10.3390/nu15153437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chae M., Kim B.J., Na J., Kim S.Y., Lee J.O., Kim Y.J., Kim W. Antimicrobial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum APsulloc 331261 and APsulloc 331266 against pathogenic skin microbiota. Front. Biosci. Elite. 2021;13(2):237–248. doi: 10.52586/E881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang H.M., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Lim E.T.C. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum postbiotics: alternative of antibiotic growth promoter to ameliorate gut health in broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.883324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauhan A., Ranjan A., Basniwal R.K., Jindal T. Probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotics in the prevention of lifestyle disorders. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2016;4(2):933–947. [Google Scholar]
- Chen H.Y., Li X.Y., Liu B.J., Meng X.H. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and survival assays under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J. Funct. Foods. 2017;29:248–255. [Google Scholar]
- Choe D., Loh T., Foo H., Hair-Bejo M., Awis Q. Egg production, faecal pH and microbial population, small intestine morphology, and plasma and yolk cholesterol in laying hens given liquid metabolites produced by Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012;53(1):106–115. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2012.659653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cristofori F., Dargenio V.N., Dargenio C., Miniello V.L., Barone M., Francavilla R. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of probiotics in gut inflammation: a door to the body. Front. Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.578386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danladi Y., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Akit H., Md Tamrin N.A., Mohammad Naeem A. Impact of feeding postbiotics and paraprobiotics produced from lactiplantibacillus plantarum on colon mucosa microbiota in broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.859284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- das Neves Selis N., de Oliveira H.B.M., Leão H.F., Dos Anjos Y.B., Sampaio B.A., Correia T.M.L., Almeida C.F., Pena L.S.C., Reis M.M., Brito T.L.S., Brito L.F. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains isolated from spontaneously fermented cocoa exhibit potential probiotic properties against Gardnerella vaginalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02264-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Souza L.F., Araújo D.N., Stefani L.M., Giometti I.C., Cruz-Polycarpo V.C., Polycarpo G., Burbarelli M.F. Probiotics on performance, intestinal morphology and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens raised with lower or higher environmental challenge. Austral J. Vet. Sci. 2018;50(1):35–41. [Google Scholar]
- De Vries M.C., Vaughan E.E., Kleerebezem M., de Vos W.M. Lactobacillus plantarum—Survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Int. Dairy J. 2006;16(9):1018–1028. [Google Scholar]
- Deepthi B., Somashekaraiah R., Poornachandra Rao K., Deepa N., Dharanesha N., Girish K., Sreenivasa M. Lactobacillus plantarum MYS6 ameliorates fumonisin B1-induced hepatorenal damage in broilers. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:2317. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eddula, P.K.Y., 2022. Evaluating the Efficacy of Postbiotics on Growth, Immunity and Gut Health in Broiler Chicken infected With Coccidiosis (PhD dissertation). Assessed on https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810210073.
- Elkin R., Lorenz E. Feeding laying hens a bioavailable soy sterol mixture fails to enrich their eggs with phytosterols or elicit egg yolk compositional changes. Poult. Sci. 2009;88(1):152–158. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farran M., El Masry B., Kaouk Z., Shaib H. Impact of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum postbiotics on the performance of layer hens under heat stress conditions. Open. J. Vet. Med. 2024;14(3):39–55. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrocino I., Biasato I., Dabbou S., Colombino E., Rantsiou K., Squara S., Gariglio M., Capucchio M.T., Gasco L., Cordero C.E., Liberto E. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, lactiplantibacillus pentosus and inulin meal inclusion boost the metagenomic function of broiler chickens. Anim. Microbiome. 2023;5(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00257-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fidanza M., Panigrahi P., Kollmann T.R. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum–nomad and ideal probiotic. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.712236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gadde U., Kim W., Oh S., Lillehoj H.S. Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2017;18(1):26–45. doi: 10.1017/S1466252316000207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao P., Ma C., Sun Z., Wang L., Huang S., Su X., Zhang H. Feed-additive probiotics accelerate yet antibiotics delay intestinal microbiota maturation in broiler chicken. Microbiome. 2017;5:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0315-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gareau M.G., Sherman P.M., Walker W.A. Probiotics and the gut microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010;7(9):503–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gheorghe A., Tabuc C., Habeanu M., Dumitru M., Lefter N.A. Effect of dietary supplementation with probiotic mixture based on Lactobacillus strains on performance, gastrointestinal development and ileal microflora in broilers. Proceedings of the 18th European Congress on Biotechnology; Switzerland; 2018. Conference paper; Conference title. 1-4 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh S., Whitley C.S., Haribabu B., Jala V.R. Regulation of intestinal barrier function by microbial metabolites. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. 2021;11(5):1463–1482. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goel A., Halami P.M. Safety assessment of probiotic lactiplantibacillus plantarum MCC5231 and its persistence in gastrointestinal tract. Microb. Pathog. 2024;194 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant A.Q., Gay C.G., Lillehoj H.S. Bacillus spp. As direct-fed microbial antibiotic alternatives to enhance growth, immunity, and gut health in poultry. Avian Pathol. 2018;47(4):339–351. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2018.1464117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han K.J., Lee J.E., Lee N.K., Paik H.D. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effect of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum KU15149 derived from Korean homemade diced-radish kimchi. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020;30(4):591. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2002.02052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hao Y., Li J., Wang J., Chen Y. Mechanisms of health improvement by lactiplantibacillus plantarum based on animal and human trials: a review. Fermentation. 2024;10(2):73. [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) Ricci A., Allende A., Bolton D., Chemaly M., Davies R., Lindqvist R. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 5: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2016. EFSA J. 2017;15(3) doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He Z., Ma Y., Yang S., Zhang S., Liu S., Xiao J., Li S. Gut microbiota-derived ursodeoxycholic acid from neonatal dairy calves improves intestinal homeostasis and colitis to attenuate extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enteroaggregative Escherichia coli infection. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01269-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hisbergues M., Magi M., Rigaux P., Steuve J., Garcia L., Goudercourt D., Jacquet A. In vivo and in vitro immunomodulation of der p 1 allergen-specific response by Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2007;37(9):1286–1295. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong J.C., Steiner T., Aufy A., Lien T.F. Effects of supplemental essential oil on growth performance, lipid metabolites and immunity, intestinal characteristics, microbiota and carcass traits in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2012;144(3):253–262. [Google Scholar]
- Huang S., Jiang S., Huo D., Allaband C., Estaki M., Cantu V., Ma C. Candidate probiotic lactiplantibacillus plantarum HNU082 rapidly and convergently evolves within human, mice, and zebrafish gut but differentially influences the resident microbiome. Microbiome. 2021;9:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01102-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humam A.M., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Samsudin A.A., Mustapha N.M., Zulkifli I., Izuddin W.I. Effects of feeding different postbiotics produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, carcass yield, intestinal morphology, gut microbiota composition, immune status, and growth gene expression in broilers under heat stress. Animals. 2019;9(9):644. doi: 10.3390/ani9090644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Igbafe J., Kilonzo-Nthenge A., Nahashon S.N., Mafiz A.I., Nzomo M. Probiotics and antimicrobial effect of lactiplantibacillus plantarum, saccharomyces cerevisiae, and bifidobacterium longum against common foodborne pathogens in poultry. Agriculture. 2020;10(9):368. [Google Scholar]
- Isaac-Bamgboye F.J., Mgbechidinma C.L., Onyeaka H., Isaac-Bamgboye I.T., Chukwugozie D.C. Exploring the potential of postbiotics for food safety and human health improvement. J. Nutr. Metab. 2024;2024(1) doi: 10.1155/2024/1868161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeong C.H., Sohn H., Hwang H., Lee H.J., Kim T.W., Kim D.S., Hong S.W. Comparison of the probiotic potential between lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from kimchi and standard probiotic strains isolated from different sources. Foods. 2021;10(9):2125. doi: 10.3390/foods10092125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeurissen S., Lewis F., van der Klis J.D., Mroz Z., Rebel J., Ter Huurne A. Parameters and techniques to determine intestinal health of poultry as constituted by immunity, integrity, and functionality. Curr. Issuses Intest. Microbiol. 2002;3(1):1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jha R., Das R., Oak S., Mishra P. Probiotics (direct-fed microbials) in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, growth and laying performance, and gut health: a systematic review. Animals. 2020;10(10):1863. doi: 10.3390/ani10101863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang X., Li X.D., Luo C.Y., Xin W.G., Zhou H.Y., Wang F., Lin L.B. Effects of dietary supplementation of lacticaseibacillus chiayiensis AACE3 on hepatic antioxidant capacity, immune factors and gut microbiology in Nandan Yao Chicks. Antibiotics. 2023;12(9):1356. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12091356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanmani P., Satish Kumar R., Yuvaraj N., Paari K., Pattukumar V., Arul V. Probiotics and its functionally valuable products—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2013;53(6):641–658. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.553752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kareem K.Y. Effect of different levels of postbiotic on growth performance, intestinal microbiota count and volatile fatty acids on quail. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):2885–2887. [Google Scholar]
- Kareem K.Y., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Akit H., Samsudin A.A. Effects of dietary postbiotic and inulin on growth performance, IGF1 and GHR mRNA expression, faecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids in broilers. Bmc. Vet. Res. 2016;12:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0790-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kareem K.Y., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Asmara S.A., Akit H., Abdulla N.R., FoongOoi M. Carcass, meat and bone quality of broiler chickens fed with postbiotic and prebiotic combinations. Int. J. Probiot. Prebiot. 2015;10(1) [Google Scholar]
- Kawashima T., Hayashi K., Kosaka A., Kawashima M., Igarashi T., Tsutsui H., Obata A. Lactobacillus plantarum strain YU from fermented foods activates Th1 and protective immune responses. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(12):2017–2024. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalique A., Zeng D., Shoaib M., Wang H., Qing X., Rajput D.S., Ni X. Probiotics mitigating subclinical necrotic enteritis (SNE) as potential alternatives to antibiotics in poultry. AMB Express. 2020;10:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-00989-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J., Balasubramanian I., Bandyopadhyay S., Nadler I., Singh R., Harlan D., Gao N. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG modifies the metabolome of pathobionts in gnotobiotic mice. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02178-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krysiak K., Konkol D., Korczyński M. Overview of the use of probiotics in poultry production. Animals. 2021;11(6):1620. doi: 10.3390/ani11061620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D., Kim S., Cho J., Kim J. Microbial population dynamics and temperature changes during fermentation of kimjang kimchi. J. Microbiol. 2008;46:590–593. doi: 10.1007/s12275-008-0156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D.K., Jang S., Baek E.H., Kim M.J., Lee K.S., Shin H.S., Ha N.J. Lactic acid bacteria affect serum cholesterol levels, harmful fecal enzyme activity, and fecal water content. Lipids Health Dis. 2009;8:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-8-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D., Cai H., Liu G., Han Y., Qiu K., Liu W., Meng K., Yang P. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FRT4 attenuates high-energy low-protein diet-induced fatty liver hemorrhage syndrome in laying hens through regulating gut-liver axis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechno. 2024;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00982-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim J.H., Yoon S.M., Tan P.L., Yang S., Kim S.H., Park H.J. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum LRCC5193, a plant‐origin lactic acid bacterium isolated from kimchi and its use in chocolates. J. Food. Sci. 2018;83(11):2802–2811. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin X., Xia Y., Yang Y., Wang G., Zhou W., Ai L. Probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum AR113 and its molecular mechanism of antioxidant. LWT. 2020;126 [Google Scholar]
- Liu D.M., Huang Y.Y., Liang M.H. Analysis of the probiotic characteristics and adaptability of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DMDL 9010 to gastrointestinal environment by complete genome sequencing and corresponding phenotypes. Lwt-Food. Sci.Technol. 2022;158(113129) [Google Scholar]
- Liu L., Li L., Li C., Wang H., Zhang X., Ren Q., Zhao C. Effects of lactiplantibacillus plantarum LPJZ-658 supplementation on the production, meat quality, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of broilers chickens. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6):1549. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu W.H., Yang C.H., Lin C.T., Li S.W., Cheng W.S., Jiang Y.P., Tsai Y.C. Genome architecture of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128, a probiotic strain with potential immunomodulatory activity. Gut Pathog. 2015;7:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13099-015-0068-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Zheng S., Cui J., Guo T., Zhang J. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Y15 alleviate type 2 diabetes in mice via modulating gut microbiota and regulating NF-κb and insulin signaling pathway. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2022;53(2):935–945. doi: 10.1007/s42770-022-00686-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loh T., Thanh N., Foo H., Hair-Bejo M. Effects of feeding metabolite combinations from lactobacillus plantarum on plasma and breast meat lipids in Broiler Chickens. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2013;15:307–316. [Google Scholar]
- Loh T.C., Thanh N.T., Foo H.L., Hair‐Bejo M., Azhar B.K. Feeding of different levels of metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, fecal microflora, volatile fatty acids and villi height in broilers. Anim. Sci. J. 2010;81(2):205–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lokapirnasari W.P., Sahidu A.M., Maslachah L., Sabdoningrum E.K., Yulianto A.B. Effect of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus in laying hens challenged by Escherichia coli infection. Sains Malays. 2020;49(6):1237–1244. [Google Scholar]
- Mani-López E., Arrioja-Bretón D., López-Malo A. The impacts of antimicrobial and antifungal activity of cell-free supernatants from lactic acid bacteria in vitro and foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food. 2022;21(1):604–641. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markkinen N., Pariyani R., Jokioja J., Kortesniemi M., Laaksonen O., Yang B. NMR-based metabolomics approach on optimization of malolactic fermentation of sea buckthorn juice with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Food Chem. 2022;366 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metrouh R., Fares R., Mechai A., Debabza M., Menasria T. Technological properties and probiotic potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SJ14 isolated from Algerian traditional cheese “Jben”. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022;46(4) [Google Scholar]
- Mohanty D., Panda S., Kumar S., Ray P. In vitro evaluation of adherence and anti-infective property of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum DM 69 against Salmonella enterica. Microb. Pathog. 2019;126:212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montoro B.P., Benomar N., Lavilla Lerma L., Castillo Gutiérrez S., Gálvez A., Abriouel H. Fermented Aloreña table olives as a source of potential probiotic Lactobacillus pentosus strains. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1583. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mu G., Gao Y., Tuo Y., Li H., Zhang Y., Qian F., Jiang S. Assessing and comparing antioxidant activities of lactobacilli strains by using different chemical and cellular antioxidant methods. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101(12):10792–10806. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murry A., Hinton A., Buhr R. Effect of botanical probiotic containing lactobacilli on growth performance and populations of bacteria in the ceca, cloaca, and carcass rinse of broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006;5(4):344–350. [Google Scholar]
- Nath S., Sikidar J., Roy M., Deb B. In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from fermented milk product. Food. Qual. Saf. 2020;4(4):213–223. [Google Scholar]
- Neal-McKinney J.M., Lu X., Duong T., Larson C.L., Call D.R., Shah D.H., Konkel M.E. Production of organic acids by probiotic lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in poultry. PLoS One. 2012;7(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Connor P.M., Kuniyoshi T.M., Oliveira R.P., Hill C., Ross R.P., Cotter P.D. Antimicrobials for food and feed; a bacteriocin perspective. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020;61:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh Y.J., Kim S.A., Yang S.H., Kim D.H., Cheng Y.Y., Kang J.I., Han N.S. Integrated genome-based assessment of safety and probiotic characteristics of lactiplantibacillus plantarum PMO 08 isolated from kimchi. PLoS One. 2022;17(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan Q., Cen S., Yu L., Tian F., Zhao J., Zhang H., Zhai Q. Niche-specific adaptive evolution of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from human feces and paocai. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;10 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.615876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parent E., Archambault M., Moore R.J., Boulianne M. Impacts of antibiotic reduction strategies on zootechnical performances, health control, and Eimeria spp. Excretion compared with conventional antibiotic programs in commercial broiler chicken flocks. Poult. Sci. 2020;99(9):4303–4313. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park I., Goo D., Nam H., Wickramasuriya S.S., Lee K., Zimmerman N.P., Lillehoj H.S. Effects of dietary maltol on innate immunity, gut health, and growth performance of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria maxima. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.667425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park K.Y., Jeong J.K., Lee Y.E., Daily J.W., III Health benefits of kimchi (Korean fermented vegetables) as a probiotic food. J. Med. Food. 2014;17(1):6–20. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2013.3083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patil A., Dubey A., Malla M.A., Disouza J., Pawar S., Alqarawi A.A., Kumar A. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum strain JDARSH, isolated from sheep milk. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020;9(2) doi: 10.1128/mra.01199-01119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng Q., Zeng X., Zhu J., Wang S., Liu X., Hou C., Qiao S. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2016;95(4):893–900. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pieper R., Janczyk P., Urubschurov V., Korn U., Pieper B., Souffrant W. Effect of a single oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum DSMZ 8862/8866 before and at the time point of weaning on intestinal microbial communities in piglets. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;130(3):227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pochard P., Hammad H., Ratajczak C., Charbonnier-Hatzfeld A.S., Just N., Tonnel A.B., Pestel J. Direct regulatory immune activity of lactic acid bacteria on der p 1–pulsed dendritic cells from allergic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005;116(1):198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiao H., Shi H., Zhang L., Song Y., Zhang X., Bian C. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum supplementation on production performance and fecal microbial composition in laying hens. Open Life Sci. 2019;14(1):69–79. doi: 10.1515/biol-2019-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin M., Xing Y., Sun M., Ma L., Li X., Ma F., Duan C. An exploration of the antioxidative and anti-inflammatory role of lactiplantibacillus plantarum 106 via improving mitochondrial function. Foods. 2024;13(13):1981. doi: 10.3390/foods13131981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reid G. Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital tract against infection. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001;73(2):437s–443s. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.437s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rigaux P., Daniel C., Hisbergues M., Muraille E., Hols P., Pot B., Jacquet A. Immunomodulatory properties of Lactobacillus plantarum and its use as a recombinant vaccine against mite allergy. Allergy. 2009;64(3):406–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz M.J., García M.D., Canalejo L.M.M., Krüger A., Padola N.L., Etcheverría A.I. Antimicrobial activity of lactiplantibacillus plantarum against shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023;134(9):lxad202. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxad202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Rychen G., Aquilina G., Azimonti G., Bampidis V., Flachowsky G. Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species. EFSA J. 2017;15(1) [Google Scholar]
- Saeed M., Hussain N., Ahmed S., Khan R.U., Andoh V., Husain S., Huayou C. The potential of lactoferrin: a call for future research in poultry nutrition. World Poult. Sci. J. 2023;79(4):731–750. [Google Scholar]
- Saghir S.A., Al Hroob A.M., Al-Tarawni A.H., Abdulghani M.A., Tabana Y., Aldhalmi A.K., Al-Yousef H.M. Effect of lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the growth, hemato-biochemical, inflammation, apoptosis, oxidative stress markers, involved gens and histopathological alterations in growing rabbits challenged with aflatoxin B1. Poult. Sci. 2024;103(9) doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salehipour Z., Haghmorad D., Sankian M., Rastin M., Nosratabadi R., Dallal M.M.S., Mahmoudi M. Bifidobacterium animalis in combination with human origin of Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorate neuroinflammation in experimental model of multiple sclerosis by altering CD4+ T cell subset balance. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;95:1535–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salim H., Kang H., Akter N., Kim D., Kim J., Kim M., Suh O. Supplementation of direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population, and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2013;92(8):2084–2090. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen X., Yi D., Ni X., Zeng D., Jing B., Lei M., Xin J. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on production performance, immune characteristics, antioxidant status, and intestinal microflora of bursin-immunized broilers. Can. J .Microbiol. 2014;60(4):193–202. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2013-0680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shu H., He X., Hong Z., Dong K., Zou Y., Cao M., Zuo H. Screening and genome analysis of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity from Sichuan sun-dried vinegar grains (Cupei) LWT. 2024;202 [Google Scholar]
- Siamansouri M., Mozaffari S., Alikhani F.E. Bacteriocins and lactic acid bacteria. J. Biol. 2013;2(5):227–234. [Google Scholar]
- Smelt M.J., de Haan B.J., Bron P.A., van Swam I., Meijerink M., Wells J.M., de Vos P. L. plantarum, L. salivarius, and L. lactis attenuate Th2 responses and increase treg frequencies in healthy mice in a strain dependent manner. PLoS One. 2012;7(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sornplang P., Piyadeatsoontorn S. Probiotic isolates from unconventional sources: a review. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2016;58:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40781-016-0108-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiles M.E., Holzapfel W.H. Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1997;36(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(96)01233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Surve S., Shinde D.B., Kulkarni R. Isolation, characterization and comparative genomics of potentially probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains from Indian foods. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):1940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05850-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Svetoch E.A., Eruslanov B.V., Levchuk V.P., Perelygin V.V., Mitsevich E.V., Mitsevich I.P., Stern N.J. Isolation of Lactobacillus salivarius 1077 (NRRL B-50053) and characterization of its bacteriocin, including the antimicrobial activity spectrum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77(8):2749–2754. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02481-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang W., Li C., He Z., Pan F., Pan S., Wang Y. Probiotic properties and cellular antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus plantarum MA2 isolated from Tibetan kefir grains. Probiot. Antimicrob. 2018;10:523–533. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9349-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thanh N.T., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Hair-Bejo M., Azhar B.K. Effects of feeding metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, faecal microbial population, small intestine villus height and faecal volatile fatty acids in broilers. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2009;50:298–306. doi: 10.1080/00071660902873947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian L., Liu R., Zhou Z., Xu X., Feng S., Kushmaro A., Sun Q. Probiotic characteristics of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum N-1 and its cholesterol-lowering effect in hypercholesterolemic rats. Probiot. Antimicrob. 2022;14(2):337–348. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09886-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomar, S.K., Anand, S., Sharma, P., Sangwan, V. and Mandal, S., 2015. Role of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and postbiotics in inhibition of pathogens. Pages 717-732 in the battle against microbial pathogens: basic science, technological advances and educational programs A. Méndez-Vilas, Ed (Book Chapter).
- Tsyganov M., Gavrilova E., Volkov R., Yarullina D., Nikitina E. Proceedings of the Paper presented at the BIO Web of Conferences. 2023. Meat quality of quail fed diets enriched with probiotic lactobacilli. [Google Scholar]
- van den Nieuwboer M., van Hemert S., Claassen E., de Vos W.M. Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS 1 and its host interaction: a dozen years after the genome. Microb. Biotechnol. 2016;9(4):452–465. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Wielen P.W., Biesterveld S., Notermans S., Hofstra H., Urlings B.A., van Knapen F. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66(6):2536–2540. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.6.2536-2540.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vincenzi A., Goettert M.I., de Souza C.F.V. An evaluation of the effects of probiotics on tumoral necrosis factor (TNF-α) signaling and gene expression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021;57:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogel R.F., Pohle B.S., Tichaczek P.S., Hammes W.P. The competitive advantage of Lactobacillus curvatus LTH 1174 in sausage fermentations is caused by formation of curvacin A. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1993;16(3):457–462. [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Nabi F., Zhang X., Zhou G., Shah Q.A., Li S., Lin Z. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on broiler health: integrated microbial and metabolomics analysis. Probiot. Antimicrob. 2024:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s12602-024-10336-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Zhang H., Rehman M.U., Mehmood K., Jiang X., Iqbal M., Li J. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Tibetan yaks. Microb. Pathog. 2018;115:293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.12.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Zhang Z., Zhu X., Zhao Y., Iqbal M., Lin Z., Bhutto Z.A. The effect of Lactobacillus sakei on growth performance and intestinal health in dogs: gut microbiota and metabolism study. Probiot. Antimicrob. 2023:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s12602-023-10160-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S., Nie Z., Zhu L., Wu Y., Wen Y., Deng F., Zhao L. Probiotic characteristics and the anti-inflammatory effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Z22 isolated from naturally fermented vegetables. Microorganisms. 2024;12(11):2159. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12112159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., An M., Zhang Z., Zhang W., Kulyar M.F.E.A., Iqbal M., Li H. Effects of milk replacer-based lactobacillus on growth and gut development of yaks’ calves: a gut microbiome and metabolic study. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10(4) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01155-22. -01122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Wu Y., Wang Y., Xu H., Mei X., Yu D., Li W. Antioxidant properties of probiotic bacteria. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):521. doi: 10.3390/nu9050521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu A., Fu Y., Kong L., Shen Q., Liu M., Zeng X., Pan D. Production of a class IIb bacteriocin with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity in lactiplantibacillus plantarum RUB1. Probiot. Antimicrob. 2021;13(6):1820–1832. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09815-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu S., Liu Y., Duan Y., Wang F., Guo F., Yan F., Yang X. Intestinal toxicity of deoxynivalenol is limited by supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum JM113 and consequentially altered gut microbiota in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018;9:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0286-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu X., Liu Y., Li Y., Tang Z., Li A., Zhang H. Molecular mechanism of thiram-induced abnormal chondrocyte proliferation via lncRNA MSTRG. 74.1-BNIP3 axis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2024;201 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.105847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y., Wang B., Zeng Z., Liu R., Tang L., Gong L., Li W. Effects of probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum 16 and paenibacillus polymyxa 10 on intestinal barrier function, antioxidative capacity, apoptosis, immune response, and biochemical parameters in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019;98(10):5028–5039. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Z., Wang J., Zheng W., Zhao S., Yang Q., Yu D., Zhu Y. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of a novel bacteriocin produced by lactiplantibacillus plantarum against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023;58(1):181–193. [Google Scholar]
- Yang C., Wang S., Li Q., Zhang R., Xu Y., Feng J. Effects of probiotic lactiplantibacillus plantarum HJLP-1 on growth performance, selected antioxidant capacity, immune function indices in the serum, and cecal microbiota in broiler chicken. Animals. 2024;14(5):668. doi: 10.3390/ani14050668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S.C., Lin C.H., Sung C.T., Fang J.Y. Antibacterial activities of bacteriocins: application in foods and pharmaceuticals. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:241. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S.Y., Chae S.A., Bang W.Y., Lee M., Ban O.H., Kim S.J., Yang J. Anti-inflammatory potential of lactiplantibacillus plantarum IDCC 3501 and its safety evaluation. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021;52:2299–2306. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00603-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yilmaz B., Bangar S.P., Echegaray N., Suri S., Tomasevic I., Manuel Lorenzo J., Melekoglu E., Rocha J.M., Ozogul F. The impacts of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on thenfunctional properties of fermented foods: a review of current knowledge. Microorganisms. 2022;10(4):826. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yilmaz B., Bangar S.P., Echegaray N., Suri S., Tomasevic I., Manuel Lorenzo J., Ozogul F. The impacts of lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the functional properties of fermented foods: a review of current knowledge. Microorganisms. 2022;10(4):826. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin Y., Liao Y., Li J., Pei Z., Wang L., Shi Y., Bai H. Lactobacillus plantarum GX17 benefits growth performance and improves functions of intestinal barrier/intestinal flora among yellow-feathered broilers. Front. Immunol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1195382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoon S., Cho H., Nam Y., Park M., Lim A., Kim J.H., Park J., Kim W. Multifunctional probiotic and functional properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LRCC5314, isolated from kimchi. J. Microbiol. Biotechn. 2021;32(1):72. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2109.09025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoon B.K., Jackman J.A., Valle-González E.R., Cho N.J. Antibacterial free fatty acids and monoglycerides: biological activities, experimental testing, and therapeutic applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19(4):1114. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu J., Zuo B., Li Q., Zhao F., Wang J., Huang W., Chen Y. Dietary supplementation with lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8 improves the growth performance and gut microbiota of weaned piglets. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024;12(2) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02345-22. -02322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan J., Zhao F., Liu Y., Liu H., Zhang K., Tian X., Wang Y. Effects of lactiplantibacillus plantarum on oxidative stress, mitophagy, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2023;102(12) doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zang W., Cao H., Ge J., Zhao D. Structures, physical properties and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles of lactiplantibacillus plantarum exopolysaccharide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;263 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002;415(6870):389–395. doi: 10.1038/415389a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng H., Shuai Y., Zeng X., Xin B., Huang M., Li B., Wang C. Evaluation of health-related composition and bioactivity of five fruit juices following Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation and simulated digestion. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021;56(2):648–660. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Y., Zeng D., Zhang Y., Ni X., Wang J., Jian P., Pan K. Lactobacillus plantarum BS 22 promotes gut microbial homeostasis in broiler chickens exposed to aflatoxin B1. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018;102(1):e449–e459. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang G., Yang N., Liu Z., Chen X., Li M., Fu T., Zhao C. Genome-assisted probiotic characterization and application of lactiplantibacillus plantarum 18 as a candidate probiotic for laying hen production. Microorganisms. 2023;11(10):2373. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Zhang L., Zhan X.A., Zeng X., Zhou L., Cao G., Yang C. Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016;7:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0061-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Man C., Sun L., Yang X., Li M., Zhang W., Jiang Y. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum J26, a probiotic strain with immunomodulatory activity. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102(12):10838–10844. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao K., Qiu L., He Y., Tao X., Zhang Z., Wei H. Alleviation syndrome of high-cholesterol-diet-induced hypercholesterolemia in mice by intervention with lactiplantibacillus plantarum WLPL21 via regulation of cholesterol metabolism and transportation as well as gut microbiota. Nutrients. 2023;15(11):2600. doi: 10.3390/nu15112600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






