Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1982 Jun;101(2):235–256. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.2.235

Genetic Differentiation between Geographically Distant Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Rama S Singh 1,2,3, Donal A Hickey 1,2,3, Jean David 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1201859  PMID: 17246085

Abstract

We have studied allozyme variation at 26 gene loci in nine populations of Drosophila melanogaster originating on five different continents. The distant populations show significant genetic differentiation. However, only half of the loci studied have contributed to this differentiation; the other half show identical patterns in all populations. The genetic differentiation in North American, European and African populations is correlated with the major climatic differences between north and south. These differences arise mainly from seven loci that show gene-frequency patterns suggestive of latitudinal clines in allele frequencies. The clinal variation is such that subtropical populations are more heterozygous than temperate populations. These results are discussed in relation to the selectionist and neutralist hypotheses of genetic variation in natural populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Band H. T. A survey of isozyme polymorphism in a Drosophila melanogaster natural population. Genetics. 1975 Aug;80(4):761–771. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.4.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. David J. R., Bocquet C. Evolution in a cosmopolitan species: genetic latitudinal clines in Drosophila melanogaster wild populations. Experientia. 1975 Feb 15;31(2):164–166. doi: 10.1007/BF01990682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. David J., Bocquet C., Pla E. New results on the genetic characteristics of the Far East race of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1976 Dec;28(3):253–260. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Day T. H., Hillier P. C., Clarke B. Properties of genetically polymorphic isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet. 1974 Feb;11(2):141–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00485770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kimura M., Maruyama T. Pattern of neutral polymorphism in a geographically structured population. Genet Res. 1971 Oct;18(2):125–131. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koehn R. K., Newell R. I., Immermann F. Maintenance of an aminopeptidase allele frequency cline by natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5385–5389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kojima K., Gillespie J., Toari Y. N. A profile of Drosophila species' enzymes assayed by electrophoresis. I. Number of alleles, heterozygosities, and linkage disequilibrium in glucose-metabolizing systems and some other enzymes. Biochem Genet. 1970 Oct;4(5):627–637. doi: 10.1007/BF00486100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kojima K., Yarbrough K. M. FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION AT THE ESTERASE 6 LOCUS IN Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Mar;57(3):645–649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Langley C. H., Tobari Y. N., Kojima K. I. Linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Nov;78(3):921–936. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.3.921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McDonald J. F., Avise J. C. Evidence for the adaptive significance of enzyme activity levels: interspecific variation in alpha-GPDH and ADH in Drosophila. Biochem Genet. 1976 Apr;14(3-4):347–355. doi: 10.1007/BF00484773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prakash S., Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):841–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ward R. D. Relationship between enzyme heterozygosity and quaternary structure. Biochem Genet. 1977 Feb;15(1-2):123–135. doi: 10.1007/BF00484555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson A. C., Maxson L. R., Sarich V. M. Two types of molecular evolution. Evidence from studies of interspecific hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2843–2847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES