Abstract
Identification of allelic variability at the two major loci ( Sd and Rsp) that interact to cause sperm dysfunction in Segregation distorter (SD) males of D. melanogaster has been hampered by the difficulty in separating the elements recombinationally. In addition, small differences in the strength of Sd alleles or sensitivities of Rsp alleles to Sd are difficult to measure against background genetic or environmental variation. Viability effects of the markers used to score progeny classes may also introduce a bias. Removal of Sd and E(SD) from their second chromosome location to create a Dp(2;Y)Sd E(SD) chromosome eliminates these problems, since any combination of Rsp alleles can be easily tested without resorting to recombinational techniques. Further, since these pairs of Rsp alleles are compared in their response to Dp Sd E(SD) in the same individual males, background variation and viability effects can be easily removed to allow finescale resolution of Rsp differences. Tests of all possible pairwise combination of six laboratory chromosomes in this way revealed at least three and possibly four different Rsp allelic classes. In addition, the hierarchical nature of the tests further allowed for determination of the presence of linked suppressors or enhancers of Sd activity. A sample of 11 second chromosomes selected from a group recently isolated from a natural population was also unambiguously ordered as to Rsp allelic status using this approach. The resultant pattern was similar to that obtained for the laboratory chromosomes, except for the not unexpected observation that the natural population apparently harbored more drive suppressors. The pattern of results obtained from these pairwise combinations of Rsp alleles supports the notion that there are no dominance interactions within the group, but that each responds more or less independently to Sd in giving sperm dysfunction.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brittnacher J. G., Ganetzky B. On the Components of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. Deletion Mapping and Dosage Analysis of the SD Locus. Genetics. 1983 Apr;103(4):659–673. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.4.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiraizumi Y., Martin D. W., Eckstrand I. A. A Modified Model of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1980 Jul;95(3):693–706. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyttle T. W. Additive Effects of Multiple SEGREGATION DISTORTER ( SD) Chromosomes on Sperm Dysfunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):203–216. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyttle T. W. Chromosomal Control of Fertility in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER . I. Rescue of T(Y;A)/bb Male Sterility by Chromosome Rearrangement. Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):423–434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyttle T. W. Experimental population genetics of meiotic drive systems. III. Neutralization of sex-ratio distortion in Drosophila through sex-chromosome aneuploidy. Genetics. 1981 Jun;98(2):317–334. doi: 10.1093/genetics/98.2.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin D. W., Hiraizumi Y. On the Models of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Oct;93(2):423–435. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.2.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temin R. G., Marthas M. Factors Influencing the Effect of Segregation Distortion in Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1984 Jul;107(3):375–393. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.3.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]