Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 Nov;120(3):791–807. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.791

Design and Analysis of Experiments on Random Drift and Inbreeding Depression

M Lynch 1
PMCID: PMC1203557  PMID: 17246484

Abstract

While the genetic consequences of inbreeding and small population size are of fundamental importance in many areas of biology, empirical research on these phenomena has proceeded in the absence of a well-developed statistical methodology. The usual approach is to compare observed means and variances with the expectations of Wright's neutral, additive genetic model for quantitative characters. If the observations deviate from the expectations more than can be accounted for by sampling variance of the parameter estimates, the null hypothesis is routinely rejected in favor of alternatives invoking evolutionary forces such as selection or nonadditive gene action. This is a biased procedure because it treats sequential samples from the same populations as independent, and because it ignores the fact that the expectations of the neutral additive genetic model will rarely be realized when only a finite number of lines are studied. Even when genes are perfectly additive and neutral, the variation among the properties of founder populations, the random development of linkage disequilibrium within lines, and the variance in inbreeding between lines reduce the likelihood that Wright's expectations will be realized in any particular set of lines. Under most experimental designs, these sources of variation are much too large to be ignored. Formulas are presented for the variance-covariance structure of the realized within- and between-line variance under the neutral additive genetic model. These results are then used to develop statistical tests for detecting the operation of selection and/or inbreeding depression in small populations. A number of recommendations are made for the optimal design of experiments on drift and inbreeding, and a method is suggested for the correction of data for general environmental effects. In general, it appears that we can best understand the response of populations to inbreeding and finite population size by studying a very large number (>100) of self-fertilizing or full-sib mated lines in parallel with one or more stable control populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avery P. J., Hill W. G. Variability in genetic parameters among small populations. Genet Res. 1977 Jun;29(3):193–213. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300017286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avery P. J., Hill W. G. Variance in quantitative traits due to linked dominant genes and variance in heterozygosity in small populations. Genetics. 1979 Apr;91(4):817–844. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.4.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant E. H., Combs L. M., McCommas S. A. Morphometric Differentiation among Experimental Lines of the Housefly in Relation to a Bottleneck. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1213–1223. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.4.1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bulmer M. G. The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study. Genet Res. 1976 Oct;28(2):101–117. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cockerham C. C., Weir B. S. Variance of actual inbreeding. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Feb;23(1):85–109. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisen E. J., Hanrahan J. P. Genetic drift and inbreeding depression measured from control populations of mice. Can J Genet Cytol. 1974 Mar;16(1):91–104. doi: 10.1139/g74-009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill W. G. Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection. Biometrics. 1972 Sep;28(3):747–765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill W. G. Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction. Biometrics. 1972 Sep;28(3):767–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lynch M. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137–148. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Muir W. M. Estimation of response to selection and utilization of control populations for additional information and accuracy. Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):381–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Robertson A. The Effect of Inbreeding on the Variation Due to Recessive Genes. Genetics. 1952 Mar;37(2):189–207. doi: 10.1093/genetics/37.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. TANTAWY A. O., REEVE E. C. Studies in quantitative inheritance. IX. The effects of inbreeding at different rates in Drosophila melanogaster. Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl. 1956;87(5):648–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Templeton A. R. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Turelli M. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Popul Biol. 1984 Apr;25(2):138–193. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wright S. Systems of Mating. II. the Effects of Inbreeding on the Genetic Composition of a Population. Genetics. 1921 Mar;6(2):124–143. doi: 10.1093/genetics/6.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES