Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 Nov;123(3):597–601. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.597

The Effect of Change in Population Size on DNA Polymorphism

F Tajima 1
PMCID: PMC1203832  PMID: 2599369

Abstract

The expected number of segregating sites and the expectation of the average number of nucleotide differences among DNA sequences randomly sampled from a population, which is not in equilibrium, have been developed. The results obtained indicate that, in the case where the population size has changed drastically, the number of segregating sites is influenced by the size of the current population more strongly than is the average number of nucleotide differences, while the average number of nucleotide differences is affected by the size of the original population more severely than is the number of segregating sites. The results also indicate that the average number of nucleotide differences is affected by a population bottleneck more strongly than is the number of segregating sites.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (348.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Maruyama T., Fuerst P. A. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. I. Allele numbers when populations evolve from zero variability. Genetics. 1984 Nov;108(3):745–763. doi: 10.1093/genetics/108.3.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Maruyama T., Fuerst P. A. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):675–689. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maruyama T., Fuerst P. A. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. III. Genic homozygosity in populations which experience periodic bottlenecks. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):691–703. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Watterson G. A. The homozygosity test after a change in population size. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):899–907. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES