Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1990 Nov;126(3):607–617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.607

The Exuperantia Gene Is Required for Drosophila Spermatogenesis as Well as Anteroposterior Polarity of the Developing Oocyte, and Encodes Overlapping Sex-Specific Transcripts

T Hazelrigg 1, W S Watkins 1, D Marcey 1, C Tu 1, M Karow 1, X Lin 1
PMCID: PMC1204216  PMID: 2249760

Abstract

The Drosophila gene exuperantia (exu) is a maternal effect gene which is needed for proper localization of the bcd RNA during the formation of oocytes. We have extended the characterization of the exu phenotype and find that the gene functions in the male as well as the female germline. Six of seven exu alleles are male-sterile; mutant defects in spermatogenesis first appear during meiosis. A genetic analysis presented here shows that the exu gene does not encode a zygotic vital function. The isolation of two overlapping deficiencies that delete exu function localizes the gene cytologically to polytene bands 57A4-B1. We describe the molecular cloning and identification of the gene, and show that it encodes overlapping sex-specific transcripts of 2.9 kb in the male and 2.1 kb in the female. We also show that these two transcripts are limited in expression to the germline. We demonstrate that one allele, exu(VL57), is a deletion of about 700 bp which results in a loss of both transcripts.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (6.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akam M. The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1987 Sep;101(1):1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berleth T., Burri M., Thoma G., Bopp D., Richstein S., Frigerio G., Noll M., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 1988 Jun;7(6):1749–1756. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03004.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boswell R. E., Mahowald A. P. tudor, a gene required for assembly of the germ plasm in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):97–104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll S. B., Winslow G. M., Schüpbach T., Scott M. P. Maternal control of Drosophila segmentation gene expression. Nature. 1986 Sep 18;323(6085):278–280. doi: 10.1038/323278a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90183-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature. 1989 Jan 12;337(6203):138–143. doi: 10.1038/337138a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Driever W., Thoma G., Nüsslein-Volhard C. Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature. 1989 Aug 3;340(6232):363–367. doi: 10.1038/340363a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edgar B. A., Odell G. M., Schubiger G. Cytoarchitecture and the patterning of fushi tarazu expression in the Drosophila blastoderm. Genes Dev. 1987 Dec;1(10):1226–1237. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.10.1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frigerio G., Burri M., Bopp D., Baumgartner S., Noll M. Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene network. Cell. 1986 Dec 5;47(5):735–746. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90516-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hay B., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. A protein component of Drosophila polar granules is encoded by vasa and has extensive sequence similarity to ATP-dependent helicases. Cell. 1988 Nov 18;55(4):577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90216-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hazelrigg T., Levis R., Rubin G. M. Transformation of white locus DNA in drosophila: dosage compensation, zeste interaction, and position effects. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):469–481. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90240-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ingham P. W. The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Sep 1;335(6185):25–34. doi: 10.1038/335025a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeffery W. R. The spatial distribution of maternal mRNA is determined by a cortical cytoskeletal domain in Chaetopterus eggs. Dev Biol. 1985 Jul;110(1):217–229. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90078-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levis R., Hazelrigg T., Rubin G. M. Separable cis-acting control elements for expression of the white gene of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 16;4(13A):3489–3499. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04108.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lifschytz E., Hareven D. Gene expression and the control of spermatid morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 15;58(2):276–294. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Macdonald P. M., Ingham P., Struhl G. Isolation, structure, and expression of even-skipped: a second pair-rule gene of Drosophila containing a homeo box. Cell. 1986 Dec 5;47(5):721–734. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90515-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Connell P. O., Rosbash M. Sequence, structure, and codon preference of the Drosophila ribosomal protein 49 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jul 11;12(13):5495–5513. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.13.5495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rebagliati M. R., Weeks D. L., Harvey R. P., Melton D. A. Identification and cloning of localized maternal RNAs from Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):769–777. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90273-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schröder C., Tautz D., Seifert E., Jäckle H. Differential regulation of the two transcripts from the Drosophila gap segmentation gene hunchback. EMBO J. 1988 Sep;7(9):2881–2887. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schüpbach T., Wieschaus E. Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Maternal effect mutations. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):101–117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stephenson E. C., Chao Y. C., Fackenthal J. D. Molecular analysis of the swallow gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1988 Dec;2(12A):1655–1665. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.12a.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stephenson E. C., Mahowald A. P. Isolation of Drosophila clones encoding maternally restricted RNAs. Dev Biol. 1987 Nov;124(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90453-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Struhl G., Struhl K., Macdonald P. M. The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1259–1273. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Winslow G. M., Carroll S. B., Scott M. P. Maternal-effect genes that alter the fate map of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Dev Biol. 1988 Sep;129(1):72–83. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90162-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES