Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0321923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321923

Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D

Pengfei Wang 1,2,*, Hua Cheng 1,2
Editor: Zeashan Hameed Khan3
PMCID: PMC12043175  PMID: 40305562

Abstract

Vigorously developing new textile materials technology is of great significance to improve the high-tech level of the textile industry, enhance the transformation and upgrading of the textile industry, promoting the sustainable development of the industry and the comprehensive national strength. This paper takes the 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world as the research object, and uses competitive situation calculation and patentometrics to explore the competitive situation, technical opportunities, and layout characteristics of technology R&D (Research and Development) in this field. The results show that the core patented technologies of the United States in the field of new textile materials are in a global leading position with a strong sense of overseas layout, which, like Japan, is more forward-looking than other countries and regions. The latter occupies a pivotal international position in a number of cutting-edge materials such as fibers, functional chemicals, and carbon fiber composites. Although China is a global patent major country, there is still a huge gap between the core patent R&D capabilities and the awareness of technical opportunities compared with developed countries such as the United States and Japan, which is the main problem that needs to be solved urgently in the future innovation and development, technology planning and layout of China’s textile industry. This study effectively supplement the theoretical analysis of competitive situation and technical opportunities of technology R&D, and enrich and expand the empirical research on international new textile materials technology and innovation.

1. Introduction

Materials are the basic elements of all social life and economic development of mankind, and as a key resource input, they play a vital role in promoting the progress of the technological revolution [1]. New materials refer to new materials with excellent properties or special functions, or materials with significantly improved performance or new functions after the improvement of traditional materials. As a basic and pillar strategic industry, new materials are the forerunner and cornerstone of high-tech development, also the indispensable material foundation for the development of the national economy, national defense, and other high-tech industries, playing an important role in promoting technological innovation, accelerating the optimization and upgrading the manufacturing industry, and ensuring national security [2,3]. In recent years, with the rapid development of human society and science and technology, more and more countries have taken the development of the new textile material industry as a major national strategic decision. Such a new textile technology of multidisciplinary convergence and integration has become the main direction to drive the upgrading of the textile industry chain, enhance the competitive advantage of enterprises, and guide the innovation and development of textile science and technology.

With the progress of society and the development of science and technology, many industries have applied new textile materials, which mainly refer to the use of advanced technology and equipment to produce high-tech fibers, high-tech fabrics and high-tech industrial textiles. The R&D of new textile materials is increasingly important to maintain the sustainable development of society as green, environmental protection, energy conservation, and emission reduction have become the common goals of the world. As a key area of international competition, new textile materials technology is a key force in promoting the high-end and intelligent development of the textile industry, and it is also an important engine for the realization of a modern textile industrial system. Therefore, an in-depth study of the global textile new materials technology competition situation, analysis of the development status of key countries, and further recognition of the technical layout and potential technical opportunities in this field will help China to carry out forward-looking and strategic technology research and development and layout with positive guiding significance for promoting technological innovation and sustainable development of the textile industry.

Patent measurement is a method to comprehensively understand the level, the new emerging clustering technique and trend of industrial technology development, and technology measurement analysis with patentometrics as the main method is one of the effective and practical methods, including examining the innovation activities of firms in the textile and clothing industry [4–6].

However, there is a lack of research of the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D, and the empirical study on international new textile materials technology and innovation can provide a more accurate and comprehensive panoramic analysis, serving a reference for the government’s science and technology innovation policy formulation, technology layout and R&D. Therefore, this paper attempts to supplement the existing research in terms of research object and research content, to potentially fill the gap of existing research.

The significance of this study is as follows: (1) Laying a theoretical foundation for future emerging technology cooperation in R&D and innovation. (2) Emphasize the findings can inform industry practices, R&D strategies, and policy frameworks. (3) Through the empirical analysis of global patent data, it provides a reference and basis for the government to rationally allocate innovation resources and formulate relevant policies, which has practical significance and application value for the decision-making of enterprise technology R&D departments.

The possible marginal contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) Supplementation of the research framework. Based on the 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world as the research object, this paper constructs the the competitive situation, technical opportunities, and layout characteristics of 170 countries and regions around the world patent technology innovation in order to effectively supplement the analytical framework of international technology R&D. (2) Expansion of research methods. This paper uses competitive situation calculation and patentometrics to scientifically explore the characteristic factors of technology R&D ability and technical opportunities so as to enrich and expand the empirical research on international technology innovation and provide policy enlightenment for optimizing regional sustainable development and national R&D innovation.

2. Literature Review

At present, scholars’ research on the technological innovation of new textile materials mainly focuses on three aspects: (1) In the field of textile raw material technology, such as herbal biomass, natural dyes, and extracted cellulose and fiber extraction [7], which are widely used in the development of high-performance, smart textiles, and multi-functional materials field [8,9], which is to meet the needs of the industry and the market, and improve the added value and competitiveness of textiles. (2) Case studies focusing on technological innovations in new textile materials, such as the use of eco-friendly technologies to produce textiles with the required physicochemical, woven auxetic fabrics and mechanical properties field [10–12], as well as scalable nanofabrication technologies to tailor smart fabrics [13] and natural fabrics [14], to meet various potential application needs. (3) Analysis of the policy mechanism of technological innovation of new textile materials, evaluates the expected impact of new technologies on topics such as the environment, automotive, aerospace, and ballistic areas and human security [15–17], and emphasizes the important role of policy guidance and supervision in the sustainable development of technology. In addition, artificial intelligence (AI) technology is also gaining more and more attention in the apparel industries, and researchers are constantly exploring and optimizing the use of AI techniques in a range of industrial applications [18,19]. Since patents are synonymous with innovative activities, the analysis of new textile material technology through patents has also attracted the attention of many scholars [20].

Core patents reflect the value of patented technologies, and the corresponding technologies or products can occupy market share and obtain high economic benefits by their competitiveness, so they have a high degree of technological competitive advantage and market economic value [21,22]. At present, academic research focuses more on the technical perspective, pointing out that the core patents are the technical patents that must be used to manufacture a certain technical field or a certain product without circumvention. Some scholars also believe that core patents are patents or patent portfolios with an important economic and strategic value that are in a key position of innovation, influential, and inevitable in a certain technical field [23–25]. Based on this research, this paper defines core patents as patents that are in a fundamental position in the technological evolution route, absolutely leading and contributing to the subsequent development of the technology with a high reference value for epitaxial technology.

The research results on technological opportunities were first proposed by Porter et al. [26] in 1995, and its core is to conduct in-depth text mining of academic papers, patent information and network resources, etc., to identify the interrelationships and development trends of existing technologies, to grasp the latest technological trends, and provide support for future technological innovation of enterprises, which also shows to a certain extent that technology opportunity analysis is essentially the mining of technological knowledge. At present, many scholars have conducted and achieved a series of results on the research in the field of artificial intelligence at different levels from the perspective of scientific literature, involving the knowledge structure, research strength, and future technological trends of expert systems [27–29]. As a special scientific document, patents reflect the development of technological innovation as an important output of scientific research and innovation activities [30]. Through the mining of patent literature, we can better identify and grasp the potential opportunities in future technology development. In this regard, this paper identifies and analyzes the technical opportunities in the field of new textile materials from three dimensions: innovation subject, patent layout, and technology integration, to provide a useful reference for the government, industry, and research institutions.

In summary, the current research on new textile material technology is mostly aimed at the new textile industry, AI technologies in the apparel industry [31] and the technical field at the level of new textiles, and there are few studies on the competitive situation and technical opportunity analysis of international textile new material technology R&D in academic circles, especially the lack of combining global patent data comparative research. Therefore, this paper takes 94,525 invention patents of new textile material technology in the world as the research object and explores the competition situation, layout characteristics, development trends, and technical opportunities of new textile material technology in major countries and regions in the world, to provide a useful reference for the technological innovation and development of the textile industry.

3. Theoretical analysis

Patent data mining is the use of patent analysis to extract valuable data information from patent documents, such as the state of industrial technology development, the main areas of technological competition and competitors’ technology layout. Through patent competitive intelligence, it helps enterprises understand the industry environment, evaluate themselves and monitor their competitors so as to obtain competitive advantages and potential opportunities [32–34].

In recent years, technology competition in emerging industries has become increasingly fierce, and more and more scholars have identified the main competitors in specific technology fields from the perspective of patent competition analysis or patent cooperation analysis, and helped innovation subjects to construct patent strategies and plans to achieve the goal of enhancing competitive advantage by tracking the trend of technology development and evaluating the innovation ability of technology [35]. With the rapid development of digital technology, the innovation ability of enterprises has become an important measure of national competitiveness. Therefore, the policy influence of different countries and the research suggestions of scholars have also had a positive effect on the decisive factors for innovative subjects to gain competitive advantages in the market, and provide an important reference for the country to formulate relevant technological strategies and promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements [36].

At the same time, as the premise of technology R&D and innovation, technology opportunity research has become a key issue of concern to the state and enterprises, and has important strategic significance for technology competition, market layout, regional innovation and industrial development. Therefore, mining technological opportunities from patent data can not only obtain possible new technologies, or new technologies that are improved on the basis of existing technologies, but also provide enterprises with important R&D intelligence and reference directions through analysis [37–39].

To sum up, the continuous innovation of technology will promote the development of the industry, this process on the one hand requires the progress of technology itself, on the other hand, there is also a demand from the market, the two need to reach a technical research and development in the unity of technical and economic possibilities [40]. Therefore, on the basis of existing research, this paper analyzes the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global textile new material technology research and development in the 21st century, in order to provide a useful reference for the forward-looking and strategic research and development layout of the government, industry and enterprise technology innovation.

4. Methods

4.1. Competitive situation calculation process

With the implementation of the economic globalization strategy and the rapid development of textile technology, a large number of multinational enterprises participate in the international market competition, and enterprises rely on applying for patents in different countries and regions to improve the competitiveness of products and technologies. Therefore, the use of core patents to carry out overseas patent layouts can help enterprises obtain exclusive intellectual property rights, and play a positive role in promoting enterprises to build brand value and enhance technological innovation capabilities [41]. At the same time, based on the recognition and respect for intellectual property rights, products with overseas intellectual property protection may gain more recognition in the process of expanding overseas markets. To further analyze the layout of each country in the global market of new textile material technology, this paper determines the core patents according to Price law and calculates the overseas export rate (OER) and the acceptance layout rate (ALR) of a country or region according to the formula in Table 1.

Table 1. Calculation formula and description of technology R&D competitive situation indicators.

Patent indicators formula description
Core patents(C) INT0.749×Nmax Nmax: The maximum number of citations for all patents; INT (): The value of citation frequency greater than or equal to the result C is determined as the core patent after taking the integer calculation.
Patent layout OERi=∑Pi→jPi×% Pi→j: Number of patent applications for new textile material technologies filed by country or region i in country or region j.
ALRi=∑Pj→iPi×% Pj→i: Number of patent applications for new textile material technologies received by country or region i from country or region j.

4.2. Patentometrics

Information such as the number of patents, patent types, patentees, and patent composition categories reflect the development trend of technological innovation in the industry. The general trend of the development of the technology field can be obtained by using the method of patent measurement to analyze the technical characteristics of the sample data [42–44]. This paper uses the global textile new material technology patent application data to reveal the characteristics and competitive layout of global textile new material technology innovation from the perspective of technology research and development competition situation and technology opportunity analysis and provides reference and selection basis for the innovation and development of the textile industry.

4.3. Data sources

The data used in this paper was obtained from the PatSnap database (https://analytics.zhihuiya.com/). For the new textile material technology, according to the existing research results [45–47], it is mainly defined as high-tech fibers, high-tech fabrics, and high-tech industrial textiles produced by high-tech processes and equipment manufacturing in recent years. Its International Patent Classification (IPC) includes two categories: D (textile) and A41 (apparel). Therefore, the new material industry is selected in the national strategic emerging industry classification, and combined with the IPC D01 fiber, D02 yarn, D03 weaving, D04 knitting, D05 sewing, and D06 fabric treatment, etc., the patent legal status is selected as “valid”. Since the period from invention patent application to publication and authorization is about 18 months, the search time frame is limited to 2021, and 170 countries and regions around the world were selected as the innovation areas of research. Through the above settings, the study was carried out, and then the results were combined with the applications, and 94,525 patent data consistent with this study were finally screened.

5. Empirical analysis results

5.1. Analysis of the competitive situation of new textile material technology R&D

Patentee analysis.

The main patentees in the sample data were selected for analysis, and the distribution data table of the top 14 patentees shown in Table 2 was obtained. Among them, the performance of Japanese companies is particularly outstanding, including Toray Corporation, Kao Corporation, Kuraray Co., Ltd., and Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, which are seven internationally renowned companies and multinational enterprises. As a world-renowned high-tech enterprise with organic synthesis, polymer chemistry, and biochemistry as its core technologies, Toray Co., Ltd., ranks first with 2,037 patents in new textile materials technology, which is almost next followed by Procter & Gamble(1,281), and Donghua University(920) combined. The company has a large number of patent applications in China, the United States, South Korea, and Europe, reflecting its international position in many cutting-edge materials such as fibers, functional chemicals, and carbon fiber composites. In addition, there are three cross-border enterprises in the United States, including Procter & Gamble, Kimberly Clark Global Co., Ltd., and Dow Global Technology Co., Ltd., and two in China and South Korea. Above three patentees constitute the main body of innovation in the world’s new textile material technology.

Table 2. Major global patentees of new textile material technologies.
No. patentees Number of patents Country Time of first application (number)
1 Toray Co., Ltd. 2037 Japan 2003 (5)
2 Procter & Gamble 1281 United States 2002 (2)
3 Donghua University 920 China 2004 (1)
4 Kolon Industries, Ltd 868 South Korea 2004 (18)
5 Kao Corporation 858 Japan 2001 (1)
6 Kimberly Clark Global Co., Ltd. 780 United States 2001 (1)
7 Kuraray Co., Ltd 738 Japan 2002 (1)
8 Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation 719 Japan 2004 (3)
9 Asahi Kasei Co., Ltd 559 Japan 2005 (4)
10 Dow Global Technology Co., Ltd. 532 United States 2003 (2)
11 Teijin Corporation 490 Japan 2003 (1)
12 Mitsui Chemicals Corporation 489 Japan 2004 (26)
13 Jiangsu Hengli Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd 487 China 2008 (2)
14 LG Chem Corporation 431 South Korea 2005 (1)

An analysis of the filing time of the world’s major patentees shows that the layout of new textile material technology in the United States and Japan is more forward-looking than that of other countries and regions. Kao Co., Ltd. and Kimberly-Clark Global Co., Ltd. began to apply as early as 2001, and Procter & Gamble and Kuraray Co., Ltd. also began to deploy in 2002. The application time of Chinese and Korean enterprises is relatively late, and Jiangsu Hengli Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. did not have application data until 2008. As an important development force in the development of new textile material technology, with the support of government policies and the integration of resources, the two countries have developed rapidly, especially Kolon Industries, which applied for 18 patents in 2004, reflecting its strong innovation strength and competitiveness in this field.

Analysis of core patents.

Core patents reflect the value of patented technology, which is an effective way to measure patent capital. The citation frequency reflects the degree to which the patent is used and valued, showing the influence of the patent [48,49]. Patent citation reflects the development law of the technical field, indicating the continuity and succession of science and technology, and the cross-integration between different disciplines. The number of patent families and the frequency of citations are commonly used indicators in patent econometrics [50]. Analyzing the citation frequency of patents to evaluate the citation of patents not only reflects the external performance of patents as expansive and groundbreaking but also illustrates the positive relationship between the higher the number of citations of patents and the greater the technical influence of the patent [51] from the perspective of technology accumulation and innovation. The patent system is territorial, and the more countries that apply for patents for the same technology, the wider the geographical scope and the higher the corresponding value [52]. Therefore, this paper synthesizes the number of patent citations, the number of patents in the same family, and the number of countries/regions in the layout to obtain the top 10 core patents of global textile new materials technology as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Global top 10 core patents of new textile material technologies.
No. Patent Number First applicant Number of citations Number of patents in the same family Number of countries/regions in the layout
1 US9011439B2 Poly-Med, Inc. 795 3 1
2 CN102783741B Donghua University 589 1 1
3 US8207511B2 Bambu Vault LLC 491 7 4
4 US7045108B2 Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. 464 3 3
5 US7172801B2 Procter & Gamble Co. 366 35 17
6 US8846184B2 Bambu Vault LLC 315 4 1
7 US8221669B2 Stratasys, Inc. 308 16 12
8 CN100500556C Tsinghua University 304 5 3
9 US7314497B2 Donaldson Co., Inc 292 56 17
10 KR101032792B1 Kolon GROUP 265 1 1

By analyzing the number of citations of patents from data sources, the highest is 795 times with a patent number US9011439B2, that is, Nmax=795, so with the help of the above core patent calculation formula, C = 21 is obtained, the total number of core patents cited more than or equal to 21 times is 712. Among the top 10 core patents in Table 3, the number of first applicants from the United States reached 6, of which Bambu Vault LLC held 2 core patents. The seven high-quality patents also reflect the global leadership of the United States in the field of new textile material technology, showing a state of “one of the best”. The two first applicants selected by China are Donghua University and Tsinghua University, indicating that universities play an important role in the field of textile technology innovation, and an important part of the national industry-university-research collaborative innovation ecosystem [53], colleges and universities play a pivotal role in technology R&D and sustainable industrial development.

In addition, the United States far exceeds other countries in the number of patent families, represented by Procter & Gamble Co., Donaldson Co., Inc. and Stratasys, Inc., etc., with a strong sense of overseas layout, which truly reflects the characteristics of “big and strong, many and excellent” in the field of new textile material technology. Although it has been proposed that the number of patent citations is used as an index to judge the value of patents, which is difficult to objectively reflect the value of patents [54], it cannot be denied that the United States has a large number of core patents in new textile material technology, reflecting its global leadership and competitiveness in textile technology innovation and development.

Technical field analysis.

In this paper, combined with the IPC (International Patent Classification), the first 4 digits of the code IPC4 are selected, and patent analysis of the global and Chinese focus areas from a technical perspective can be carried out, to be able to explore the current important technical fields of new textile materials from a micro perspective, and the results as shown in Table 4. China and other countries in the world are relatively more concerned about the technology that mainly includes D01F (equipment for making artificial filament fiber chemical characteristics or carbon fiber), D06M (biochemical treatment of fiber products made of fiber, yarn and thread raw materials), D04H (textiles manufacturing), and D01D (mechanical method or equipment for making chemical filament, thread and fiber), etc., illustrating the production of artificial filament, the chemical characteristics of fibers, equipment dedicated to the production of carbon fibers, manufacturing textiles and making chemical filaments, fibers, and other technologies are the most favored by the market. Moreover, the proportion of the above technologies in China is higher than the number in the world, indicating that the huge market demand and technology application have played a positive role in promoting the research development, and innovation of domestic textile technology, and have become a global research hotspot in the field of new textile materials.

Table 4. Global distribution of new textile material technologies.
No. Global China
IPC4 Number of patents rate (%) IPC4 Number of patents rate (%)
1 D01F 14801 24.63 D01F 10796 31.29
2 D04H 13686 22.78 D06M 9847 28.54
3 D06M 11961 19.90 D01D 6979 20.23
4 D01D 7984 13.29 D04H 4127 11.96
5 D03D 5927 9.86 D06P 3945 11.44
6 C08L 5110 8.50 C08G 3408 9.88
7 D02G 5040 8.39 D02G 2768 8.02
8 C08J 4498 7.49 D03D 2309 6.69
9 C08K 3245 5.40 C08L 2296 6.66
10 C08G 3137 5.22 D06B 1647 4.77
11 D06P 3088 5.14 C08K 1595 4.62
12 C09D 2997 4.99 C08F 1503 4.36
13 A41D 2961 4.93 C08J 1411 4.09
14 B01D 2320 3.86 D06C 1410 4.09
15 C08F 1859 3.09 C09B 1161 3.37
16 D04B 1762 2.93 D04B 1139 3.30

Although there are similarities in the distribution of new textile material technologies at home and abroad, obvious differences exist. C08L (polymer compound compositions), A41D (outerwear, protective clothing, apparel accessories), and C09D (paint compositions, e.g., colour paints, varnishes or natural paints) technologies also occupy a relatively important share in the world, indicating that the research on the composition of polymer compounds, outerwear, and coating compositions has also received great attention from foreign enterprises. D06C (fabric finishing, sizing, stretching or elongation), C09B (organic dyes), and D04B (knitted) technologies also have a high ratio in China, reflecting the strong demand in the domestic market for fabric finishing, organic dyes, or related compounds used to make dyes and knitting technologies.

5.2. Analysis of new textile materials technology opportunities

Analysis of technology opportunities from the perspective of innovation subjects.

Discovering potential competitors and their advantageous directions from the perspective of the innovator can help enterprises formulate technological innovation strategies and discover or expand technological opportunities. Therefore, this paper analyzes the distribution of the strength of innovative subjects in the field of textile new material technology from the macro level of the country (region) and the micro level of technology that enterprises are concerned about. The results as shown in Table 5. At present, the patents of new textile material technology are mainly distributed in East Asia and North America. In terms of quantity, China ranks first with 34,481 patents, Japan (13,347), the United States (11,467), and South Korea (10,438) are in the same echelon, but the development of this field is very uneven in the world, and the number of patents applied for by China, the United States and Japan and South Korea exceeds 70% of the global total, showing the obvious strength and advantages of technological innovation.

Table 5. Global distribution of new textile material technologies by country and region.
No. Country (Region) Number of patents rate (%) Cumulative proportion (%)
1 China 34481 36.48 36.48
2 Japan 13347 14.12 50.60
3 United States 11467 12.13 62.73
4 South Korea 10438 11.04 73.77
5 European Patent Office 6877 7.28 81.05
6 Chinese Taiwan 2502 2.65 87.70
7 Spain 1703 1.80 85.50
8 Canda 1473 1.56 87.06
9 Brazil 1174 1.24 88.30
10 Others 11063 11.70 100.00

The results of the World Intellectual Property Organization’s (WIPO) Global Innovation Index (GII) 2022 showed that the world’s top five science and technology clusters are composed of China, Japan, South Korea, and the United States, which is also a strong validation of the above conclusions of innovation subjects. As the leading force in scientific and technological innovation, the competition for national scientific and technological strength is reflected in the competition between enterprises at the micro level, so the technology-patentee R&D network reflects the patent layout of global research institutions. The results as shown in Fig 1. Among them, the polygon icon represents the IPC4 patent classification number of textile new material technology, and the square icon represents the R&D institution.

Fig 1. “Technology-patentee” R&D network.

Fig 1

Fig 1 shows that technologies such as D01F, D06M, D04H, and D01D are at the core of the R&D network and have become the main direction of attention and layout of many R&D institutions. Among them, Kuraray Co., Ltd mainly focuses on D01F and D04H technologies, and as a well-known comprehensive chemical company in Japan, it has established a high-quality technology system with originality based on polymer chemistry and synthetic chemistry technology, integrating related peripheral technologies and experience. In addition, multinational companies such as Procter & Gamble, DuPont, and Kolon Industries, Ltd also have a wide range of layouts in D02G (fiber) technology.

Analysis of technology opportunities from the perspective of patent portfolios.

To protect the main market or potential market of existing technologies and products, innovative entities carry out overseas patent layouts by applying for patents. Therefore, the analysis of the overseas layout of patents in different countries or regions is helpful in digging out the layout characteristics of new textile material technology. Table 6 shows the matrix of the global patent layout of new textile material technology, indicating the number of patents developed in China (CN), the United States (US), Japan (JP), South Korea (KR), Canada (CA), Spain (ES), the United Kingdom (GB), South Africa (ZA), France (FR), Germany (DE) and Brazil (BR), and the last column shows the patent family ratio of the country’s overseas layout.

Table 6. Patent layout matrix of global textile new material technologies.
Country CN US JP KR CA ES GB ZA FR DE … BR Sum Oveasea proportion
CN 32002 669 282 105 28 31 7 31 1 29 … 28 34496 7.02%
US 1425 5455 1484 793 794 341 91 147 11 199 … 473 11467 86.89%
JP 2377 2077 9812 1260 142 163 4 32 2 143 … 96 13339 74.15%
KR 413 585 409 7425 17 26 6 9 6 43 … 23 10452 19.34%
CA 16 117 11 8 54 13 1 3 1 1 … 1 311 82.64%
ES 8 34 12 4 2 104 1 1 4 4 … 3 251 58.57%
GB 66 179 77 42 28 54 86 27 3 12 … 37 978 91.21%
ZA 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 … 0 22 63.64%
FR 216 401 198 76 116 123 1 16 519 51 … 98 2754 81.15%
DE 567 793 446 244 99 351 8 38 12 392 … 126 5430 91.22%
BR 6 19 5 5 7 10 1 2 2 1 … 49 141 68.79%

Although China’s textile new material technology patent applications rank first in the world, only 7.02% of the patents are applied for overseas at the same time, and the acceptance rate of the layout rate is 16.98%, of which the main source countries are Japan (40.39%), the United States (24.27%), Germany (9.68%) and South Korea (7.04%), etc. These countries apply for a relatively high share of patents in China, not only having a far-reaching impact on domestic textile technology innovation but also acting as an important importer of key core technologies in China’s textile industry green production, smart manufacturing, and high-performance fibers. This not only shows that the Chinese market has a huge external attraction, but also shows that developed countries or regions such as Europe, the United States, and Japan use technological opportunities to carry out patent layouts and advanced strategies, forming a relatively strong control over the Chinese textile market. In contrast, China’s innovation institutions are seriously lagging in their awareness and action of international patent layout, and are in a weak position in seizing the international market.

According to the global textile new material technology patent layout matrix, and with the help of the scientific knowledge graph software Gephi, the patent overseas layout network as shown in Fig 2 can be obtained. Among them, the United States (US), Japan (JP), China (CN), South Korea (KR), and Germany (DE) are located in the center of the network. Therefore, these countries are the key areas of the patent layout of new textile material technology, and they are also important markets that are closely watched.

Fig 2. Patent layout network of global textile new material technologies.

Fig 2

Analysis of technology opportunities from the perspective of technology convergence.

Modern science and technology present a dual development trend of high integration and high differentiation, while the correlation between different disciplines or technical fields is precisely the basis for the convergence and differentiation of science [55,56]. New textile materials are a highly comprehensive interdisciplinary discipline developed based on multidisciplinarity, involving materials science, chemistry, engineering, physics, biology, and computer science. Due to its convergence of multiple technologies, smart manufacturing, digital technology, chemical industry, biomanufacturing, and advanced material technology offer great opportunities for the development of new textile materials. As the most effective carrier of technical information, patents contain the latest and most comprehensive technical information in the world and are the most valuable indicators to measure technological development and innovation. Therefore, it is scientific and feasible to discuss the level of technology convergence based on patents.

Due to the cross-convergence of modern technology, it usually involves multiple technical fields. This study combines two aspects of breadth and depth to further analyze the degree of convergence between new textile material technologies around the world (the results are shown in Table 7. Among them, the breadth of technology convergence refers to the proportion of the number of technologies integrated with other technologies in the total number of technology topics, the greater the breadth, the more basic the technology; the depth of technology convergence refers to the proportion of the number of patents with technology integration under a certain technology theme to the number of all patents under the theme, and the higher the depth, the stronger the dependence of the technology on other technologies.

Table 7. The breadth and depth of global textile new material technology convergence.
IPC4 global China
Number of patents breadth of convergence (%) depth of convergence (%) Number of patents breadth of convergence (%) depth of convergence (%)
D01F 14799 57.00 38.33 10791 42.08 43.37
D06M 11956 66.90 60.13 9841 55.10 66.94
D01D 7983 55.83 68.08 6979 42.24 66.96
D04H 13680 62.86 55.47 4124 41.61 52.66
D06P 3086 51.64 44.63 3942 56.39 65.21
C08G 3136 73.49 48.04 3406 46.40 67.60
D02G 5041 54.95 56.07 2767 40.04 60.20
D03D 5925 58.40 61.59 2309 43.20 41.09
C08L 5107 77.38 51.12 2294 62.54 43.37
D04B 1761 59.67 46.38 1139 41.98 53.19
C08K 3243 79.25 53.49 1593 59.26 40.68
C08F 1858 79.54 39.79 1501 57.51 55.41
C08J 4498 74.19 64.44 1410 59.17 35.81
C09D 2996 51.35 47.03 1046 74.66 28.51
A41D 2961 79.30 49.61 952 61.06 34.08
B01D 2319 52.26 65.64 833 51.80 36.25

Globally, the range of technology convergency is more than 70% of technologies such as C08F (a polymer compound obtained by reacting only with carbon-carbon unsaturated bonds), A41D, C08K (using inorganic or non-polymeric organic compounds as ingredients), C08L and C08G (polymer compounds obtained by reactions other than carbon-carbon unsaturated bonds), That is to say, these technologies are highly complex and closely related to other technologies in an important node position in the global textile new material technology network. However, there are obvious differences in the breadth of China’s technology integration, and there is only one technology for more than 70%, indicating that the integration of China’s new textile material technology is still a long way. In terms of the depth of fusion, the patented technologies represented by foreign D01D, B01D (separation), and C08J (processing, general process of ingredients) are more obvious. In contrast, China’s technology convergence is mainly reflected in the technical themes of C08G, D01D, D06M, and D06P (textiles dyeing or printing), which are usually combined with other technologies of strong symbiosis, so when these dependent technologies make certain breakthroughs, they will drive the rapid development of related technologies.

6. Discussion

The results of this paper are helpful in sorting out the competitive situation and potential technical opportunities of global textile new material technology R&D. Although the existing research objects in the academic community involve many emerging industries and technologies, there is no research on the global competitive situation and technology opportunity analysis of new textile materials. Therefore, this paper attempts to supplement the existing research in terms of research object and research content, to potentially fill the gap of existing research.

6.1. Regional Innovation Trends

The global textile new materials technology innovation is developing rapidly in the direction of high performance, green, intelligence and industrial chain synergy, and around the concept of “revolutionary fibers and textiles”, it further integrates interdisciplinary achievements such as nanotechnology and bioengineering to promote the breakthrough of material performance limits. At the same time, digitalization and greening go hand in hand, reshaping the global textile value chain and realizing the transition from “manufacturing” to “intelligent manufacturing”. To maintain its global leadership in the field of new materials technology, the United States has set a series of development goals at the comprehensive strategic planning level, including the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI, launched in 2000), the Materials Genome Project (launched in 2011), and the National Manufacturing Innovation Network (now known as Manufacturing America) in 2012. It has taken the lead in completing the layout of patented technology research and development and technology opportunity development in the world. Global companies in the chemical industry, advanced materials production, and materials science, represented by Procter & Gamble, Kimberley-Clark Global Ltd., and Dow Global Technologies, provide an important guarantee for the United States to maintain its global leadership position in the development of the new textile materials industry. In addition, Japan’s textile new material technology research and development strength is also at the forefront of the world, as early as the 80s and 90s of the last century, the Japanese government began to take a series of measures to promote the development of new material technology, put forward the goal of “focusing on the practicability of new materials, considering the coordinated development of the environment and resources”, so it occupies a pivotal international position in the field of cutting-edge materials such as global carbon fiber technology, functional chemical products, new chemical materials, and man-made fibers.

Under the model of full-staff collaboration and innovation that promotes the reform and reorganization of large enterprise groups and encourages the integration of the public and private sectors, South Korea has become an important force in the technical fields of spinning, printing and dyeing, garment production, and textile machinery manufacturing. Since 2012, the government has established policies such as the Nano Convergence 2020 Project, the Third Basic Plan for Science and Technology, and the Korea Future Growth Engines Plan, creating global aramid fiber and new chemical material manufacturers represented by Kolon Industries and LG Chem, which have maintained Korea’s global competitiveness in new textile material technology. The development of new textile materials in Europe is similar to that of the United States and Japan, and it attaches great importance to the construction of industrial clusters with its characteristics, establishing and improving the industrial standardization system based on core technology and core manufacturing, and with the intensification of global sustainable development and international trade competition, its new textile material innovation model focuses on industrial demand, emphasizing the added value of textile materials. In 2011, six major technologies, including advanced materials, were identified as key enabling technologies (KETs) for the EU industry, and materials and nanomaterial technology were funded and deployed as important research areas, among which textile new material technology occupies an increasingly important position in the field of EU science and technology development.

6.2. Challenges in China

Although China’s textile new material technology R&D started relatively late, it has developed relatively rapidly, and has produced several technological achievements that have reached or approached the international advanced level. However, it still faces multiple challenges, mainly involving technology, industry, market and environment. Firstly, in the R&D and application of key technologies and equipment such as new fiber materials, advanced textile products, green manufacturing, and intelligent manufacturing, there is a relatively large gap with developed countries such as the United States and Japan, and the problem of “big but not strong, big but not excellent” is still more prominent, and it is hoped that the country will pay attention to the coherent support and long-term layout of the policy, as well as strengthen international technological innovation and cooperation, encourage domestic enterprises to pay attention to the core patent layout and technological innovation, and actively participate in international competition to enhance the competitiveness of enterprise products and technologies. Secondly, the low conversion rate of achievements of universities and scientific research institutes, the lack of R&D investment of enterprises and other industrial chain coordination and industrialization problems, the dependence on imports of high-end textile equipment and testing instruments, and the pressure of environmental protection and sustainable development restricts the overall upgrading of the whole industrial chain. Finally, the performance evaluation of new materials and the integration of testing standards with international standards need to be further improved, which will affect the market promotion and the competition pattern of application scenarios in emerging fields such as aerospace, defense, and medical.

6.3. Actionable recommendations

In view of the characteristics of industrial base, resource endowment and policy orientation in different regions, it is suggested that the advantages of each other, and the relevant and feasible R&D strategies for global textile new materials technology are as follows:

(1) In China, promote cooperation between universities and leading enterprises, focusing on the R&D and innovation of high-performance fibers, green materials and degradable textiles. (2) In Japan, we will strengthen the role of Toray, Teijin and other enterprises in technological refinement and high-end material leadership, establish a circular industrial chain of chemical fiber, textile, and consumer brands, and realize sustainable innovation in the circular economy. (3) In South Korea, vigorously develop the application of smart textiles and consumption scenarios, and expand the commercial market of functional materials for international companies such as Samsung Electronics and LG Chem. (4) In the United States, promote disruptive technology incubation and interdisciplinary collaborative development and innovation, promote the application and breakthrough of bioengineering materials in the textile field, and establish a traceability system for textile raw materials based on the blockchain. (5) In Europe, we will continue to strengthen the construction of sustainable standards and recycling systems, promote globally recognized standardization and certification systems, and realize the industrial cluster effect of regional industries such as high-end textiles in Italy, machinery manufacturing in Germany and bio-based materials in Northern Europe.

In summary, with the impact of COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019) and global geopolitics, countries are paying more and more attention to upgrading supply chain security, so they continue to increase national-level strategic support and investment and begin to promote the reform and restructuring of large enterprises to play a centralized role. Although the United States and Japan still have obvious advantages, the technology gap between various regions is narrowing, and the competition in the field of new textile material technology has entered a white-hot stage.

7. Conclusions and recommendations

7.1. Research summary

Based on the data of 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world, this paper analyzes the competitive situation and technical opportunities of technology R&D in this field, and finds that:

  • (1) Japanese companies are particularly prominent among the world’s major patent holders, and internationally renowned multinational companies represented by Toray Corporation have the highest number of patents for new textile material technology, reflecting their very important international position in the field of fibers, functional chemical products, carbon fiber composite materials and other cutting-edge materials. The United States, China, and South Korea followed, and together they constitute the main body of innovation in the world’s new textile material technology.

  • (2) In terms of technology layout, the United States and Japan are more forward-looking than other countries and regions. Kao Co., Ltd. and Kimberley-Clark Global Co., Ltd. began patent applications for new textile material technology in 2001, and Procter & Gamble and Kuraray Co., Ltd. also began to deploy in 2002. However, with the support of government policies and the integration of resources, the two countries’ innovative entities of China and South Korea have developed rapidly, especially Kolon Industries, which applied for 18 patents in 2004, reflecting its strong innovation strength and competitiveness in this field, and has become an important development force for new textile material technology. Combined with the frequency of patent citations, the number of patents in the same family, and the number of countries, the study also found that the core patented technology of the United States in the field of new textile material technology is in a global leading position, and has a strong sense of overseas layout, showing its characteristics of “big and strong, many and excellent” in the field of new textile material technology.

  • (3) the technical opportunities that countries around the world are relatively more concerned about mainly include D01F, D06M, D04H, and D01D, etc., indicating that the chemical characteristics of the production of artificial filament, the chemical characteristics of the fiber, the equipment dedicated to the production of carbon fiber, the manufacturing of textiles and the mechanical methods or equipment for making chemical filament and fiber are more favored by the market.

7.2. Limitations and future research

After decades of development, the global textile new material technology R&D pattern is changing, but the development of innovation bodies in various countries is unbalanced, and China and Japan are becoming the core forces of cooperative R&D in this field. Under the guidance of global sustainable development goals such as green, low-carbon, and energy-saving, new textile material technology needs to continue to strengthen diffusion, integration and alliance, and continue to play a leading role in international cooperation and technological innovation. Although this paper has reference significance and value for the research on filling the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global textile new material technology R&D, there are still some limitations: due to the shortcomings of the patent database, it is impossible to use the function of the technology roadmap to analyze the infrastructure and path of technology R&D evolution in more depth. At the same time, by limiting the scope of the study to the IP5, the research horizon will be subject to some limitations.

In summary, China’s huge textile market demand and technology application, have played a positive role in promoting domestic textile technology innovation. As an essential part of the national industry-university-research collaborative innovation ecosystem, universities play an important role in the field of textile technology innovation in China, as well as in technology research and development and sustainable industrial development. Although the domestic textile new material technology research and development has achieved relatively rich results, the core patented technology and the layout of cutting-edge new materials are still facing huge challenges. How to solve the contradiction of “big but not strong, many but not excellent” in China is currently facing new challenges in China’s innovation and development, technical planning, and layout in the textile industry.

Although this paper has reference significance and value for the research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D, there are some limitations. Due to limitations of the patent database and IP5 scope, which may not capture all forms of technology R&D collaboration, as some collaborations may not result in patent applications. In the future, more complete global data will be available to compare countries for further and more comprehensive analyses.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for all those who participated in the innovation management team of the Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Inter-connection of Zhejiang Province and Zhejiang Sci-Tech University.

Data Availability

The data used in this paper was obtained from the PatSnap database (https://analytics.zhihuiya.com/).

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Project Fund of Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province (Project No.111504A4E22004), and Silk & Fashion Culture Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial Key Research Institute of Philosophy and Social Science (Project No. 2022JDKTYB27). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Glass J, Dainty A, Gibb A. New build: Materials, techniques, skills and innovation. Energy Policy. 2008;36(12):4534–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baba Y, Shichijo N, Sedita SR. How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the advanced materials field. Res Policy. 2009;38(5):756–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lubik S, Garnsey E. Early Business Model Evolution in Science-based Ventures: The Case of Advanced Materials. Long Range Planning. 2016; 49(3):393–408. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Curran C, Leker J. Patent indicators for monitoring convergence - examples from NFF and ICT. Technol Forecast Soc. 2011;78(2):256–73. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Érdi P, Makovi K, Somogyvári Z, Strandburg K, Tobochnik J, Volf P, et al. Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network. Scientometrics. 2013;95(1):225–42. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0796-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giannini V, Iacobucci D, Perugini F. Local variety and innovation performance in the EU textile and clothing industry. Econ Innov New Tech. 2019;28(8):841–57. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2019.1571668 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaker K, Umair M, Shahid S, Jabbar M, Khan RMWU, Zeeshan M, et al. Cellulosic Fillers Extracted from Argyreia Speciose Waste: A Potential Reinforcement for Composites to Enhance Properties. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19(11):4210–22. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1856271 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu R, Liu Y, Shin S, Huang S, Ren X, Shu W, et al. Emerging Materials and Strategies for Personal Thermal Management. Advanced Energy Materials. 2020;10(17). doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903921 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Luan P, Zhao X, Copenhaver K, Ozcan S, Zhu H. Turning Natural Herbaceous Fibers into Advanced Materials for Sustainability. Adv Fiber Mater. 2022;4(4):736–57. doi: 10.1007/s42765-022-00151-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaminski K, Jarosz M, Grudzien J, Pawlik J, Zastawnik F, Pandyra P, et al. Hydrogel bacterial cellulose: a path to improved materials for new eco-friendly textiles. Cellulose. 2020;27(9):5353–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khan RMWU, Nawab Y, Safdar MM, Asghar MA, Umair M. Comparative Geometrical Analysis of In Situ Mechanical Performance of 2-D Woven In-Plane Auxetic Structures. J Test Eval. 2023;51(6):3733–44. doi: 10.1520/JTE20230195 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khan RMWU, Hussain M, Nawab Y, Umair M. Influence of tetrahedral architectures on fluid transmission and heat retention behaviors of auxetic weaves. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2023;42:101946. doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101946 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kang TJ, Choi A, Kim DH, Jin K, Seo DK, Jeong DH, et al. Electromechanical properties of CNT-coated cotton yarn for electronic textile applications. Smart Mater Struct. 20(1);2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu B, Li W, Zhang Q, Li D, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. Subambient daytime radiative cooling textile based on nanoprocessed silk. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(12):1336–42. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00987-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dangelico RM, Pontrandolfo P, Pujari D. Developing Sustainable New Products in the Textile and Upholstered Furniture Industries: Role of External Integrative Capabilities. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2013;30(4):642–58. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Köhler AR, Som C. Risk preventative innovation strategies for emerging technologies the cases of nano-textiles and smart textiles. Technovation. 2014;34(8):420–30. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2013.07.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iftekhar H, Khan RMWU, Nawab Y, Hamdani STA, Panchal S. Numerical Analysis of Binding Yarn Float Length for 3D Auxetic Structures. Phys Status Solidi B. 2020;257(10). doi: 10.1002/pssb.202000440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Noor A, Saeed MA, Ullah T, Uddin Z, Khan RMWU. A review of artificial intelligence applications in apparel industry. J Text I. 2022;113(3):505–14. doi: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1880088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Karamchandani SH, Mustafa HD, Merchant SN, Desai UB. tuPOY: Epitomizing a New Epoch in Communications With Polymer Textiles. P Ieee. 2012;100(11):3079–98. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2178009 PMID:WOS:000310148800009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun MH, Zhu XZ, Jiang M. Exploring the innovation landscape of bamboo fiber technologies from global patent data perspective. Cellulose. 2020;27(16):9137–56. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03431-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nordensvard J, Zhou Y, Zhang X. Innovation core, innovation semi-periphery and technology transfer: The case of wind energy patents. Energy Policy. 2018;120:213–27. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu HC, Chen HY, Lee KY. Unveiling the core technology structure for companies through patent information. Technol Forecast Soc. 2010;77(7):1167–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cho TS, Shih HY. Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997-2008. Scientometrics. 2011;89(3):795–811. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Han SQ, Huang HL, Huang XH, Li YH, Yu RH, Zhang J. Core patent forecasting based on graph neural networks with an application in stock markets. Technol Anal Strateg. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Noh H, Song YK, Lee S. Identifying emerging core technologies for the future: Case study of patents published by leading telecommunication organizations. Telecommun Policy. 2016;40(10-11):956–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Porter AL, Detampel MJ. Technology opportunities analysis. Technol Forecast Soc. 1995;49(3):237–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eom SB. Decision support systems research: current state and trends. Ind Manage Data Syst. 1999;99(5):213–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ibáñez A, Larrañaga P, Bielza C. Using Bayesian networks to discover relationships between bibliometric indices. A case study of computer science and artificial intelligence journals. Scientometrics. 2011;89(2):523–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park I, Yoon B, Kim S, Seol H. Technological Opportunities Discovery for Safety Through Topic Modeling and Opinion Mining in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of Artificial Intelligence. Ieee T Eng Manage. 2021;68(5):1504–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang MY, Fang SC, Chang YH. Exploring technological opportunities by mining the gaps between science and technology: Microalgal biofuels. Technol Forecast Soc. 2015;92:182–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Noor A, Saeed MA, Ullah T, Uddin Z, Khan RMWU. A review of artificial intelligence applications in apparel industry. J Text I. 2022;113(3):505–14. doi: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1880088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Homburg C, Alavi S, Rajab T, Wieseke J. The contingent roles of R&D-sales versus R&D-marketing cooperation in new-product development of business-to-business firms. Int J Res Mark. 2017;34(1):212–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jeong B, Yoon J. Competitive Intelligence Analysis of Augmented Reality Technology Using Patent Information. Sustainability-Basel. 2017;9(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang B, Liu S, Ding K, Liu Z, Xu J. Identifying technological topics and institution-topic distribution probability for patent competitive intelligence analysis: a case study in LTE technology. Scientometrics. 2014;101(1):685–704. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1342-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karvonen M, Kapoor R, Uusitalo A, Ojanen V. Technology competition in the internal combustion engine waste heat recovery: a patent landscape analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;112:3735–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qiu H, Yang J. An Assessment of Technological Innovation Capabilities of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Based on Patent Analysis: A Comparative Study between China and the United States. Sustainability-Basel. 2018;10(3):877. doi: 10.3390/su10030877 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Singh NA. Nanotechnology innovations, industrial applications and patents. Environ Chem Lett. 2017;15(2):185–91. doi: 10.1007/s10311-017-0612-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kwon D, Lee HY, Cho JH, Sohn SY. Effect of an open patent pool strategy on technology innovation in terms of creating shared value. Technol Forecast Soc. 2023;187. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yuan X, Li X. Mapping the technology diffusion of battery electric vehicle based on patent analysis: A perspective of global innovation systems. Energy. 2021;222:119897. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119897 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lee Y, Kim SY, Song I, Park Y, Shin J. Technology opportunity identification customized to the technological capability of SMEs through two-stage patent analysis. Scientometrics. 2014;100(1):227-44. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1216-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yu X, Zhang B. Obtaining advantages from technology revolution: A patent roadmap for competition analysis and strategy planning. Technol Forecast Soc. 2019;145:273–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lai KK, Chen HC, Chang YH, Kumar V, Bhatt PC. A structured MPA approach to explore technological core competence, knowledge flow, and technology development through social network patentometrics. J Knowl Manag. 2021;25(2):402–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ozcan S, Unalan S. Blockchain as a General-Purpose Technology: Patentometric Evidence of Science, Technologies, and Actors. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2022;69(3):792–809. doi: 10.1109/tem.2020.3008859 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Song HY, Hou JH, Zhang Y. Catalytic capacity of technological innovation: Multidimensional definition and measurement from the perspective of knowledge spillover. Technol Soc. 2022;68. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Słubik A, Masłowska-Lipowicz I, Wyrębska Ł, Królikowski B, Malinowski R, Bajer K. New ionic liquids based on the biguanide cation with antimicrobial properties for applications in the textile and polymer materials industries. Fibres Text East Eur. 2023;31(1):9–14. doi: 10.2478/ftee-2023-0002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Papaspyrides CD, Pavlidou S, Vouyiouka SN. Development of advanced textile materials: Natural fibre composites, anti-microbial, and flame-retardant fabrics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2009;223(L2):91–102. doi: 10.1243/14644207jmda200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sibiescu D, Chirila L, Rosca I, Butnaru R, Vizitiu M, Carja G. New complexes used to increase the dying process efficiency of the textile materials in the context of sustainable development. Environ Eng Manag J. 2010;9(1):119–23. doi: 10.30638/eemj.2010.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Duggan M, Garthwaite C, Goyal A. The Market Impacts of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in Developing Countries: Evidence from India. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(1):99–135.31178595 [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hou Y, Png I, Xiong X. When stronger patent law reduces patenting: Empirical evidence. Strategic Manage J. 2023;44(4):977–1012. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M. Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition. Rand J Econ. 2001;32(1):129–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Karki MMS. Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Pat Inf. 1997;19(4):269–72. doi: 10.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Trajtenberg M. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1990;21(1):172. doi: 10.2307/2555502 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li Z, Zhu GL. Knowledge Transfer Performance of Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration in China: The Moderating Effect of Partner Difference. Sustainability-Basel. 2021;13(23). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bessen J. The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy. 2008;37(5):932–45. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy. 2003;32(1):69–87. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00004-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li J, Wang J. Does the Technological Diversification and R&D Internationalization of eMNCs Promote Enterprise Innovation?. J Glob Inf Manag. 2021;29(5SI):1–19. doi: 10.4018/JGIM.20210901.oa1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yasir Nawab

13 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-23639Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&DPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The self explainatory comments of reviewers are there for your guidance. ==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 27 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yasir Nawab, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:   

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

 [This research was funded by The Funding of Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, grant number 111504A4E22004, and Silk & Fashion Culture Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial Key Research Institute of Philosophy and Social Science, grant number 2022JDKTYB27.].  

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Additional Editor Comments:

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the manuscript titled “Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D” the researcher took the 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world as the research object and explored the competitive situation, technical opportunities, and layout characteristics of technology research and development in this field. .

Here are some points in the current study that need to be addressed for a better understanding of the research.

1. What was the criteria of selecting the patents to be added in this study? And how you have collected the data? Please explain the research methodology in detail.

2. What is meant by “D03 weaving, D04 weaving”, what is the difference between both? Please also explain the term D first then use the 1,2 and 3 etc.

3. The abbreviations are not explained in the text clearly, specifically used in table 4. Please explain.

4. You never mentioned that the patent includes local patents, or these are only international patents?

5. The literature review should be improved. Some other important studies must be added to this research. Below some important studies are referred to enrich the literature review.

• A review of artificial intelligence applications in apparel industry

(DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1880088)

Reviewer #2: The article titled aims to analyze the global landscape of research and development (R&D) in new textile materials technology. It focuses on 94,525 invention patents related to new textile materials, examining the competitive positions, technical opportunities, and R&D layout characteristics. Although the article presents a valuable analysis of the global competitive situation and technical opportunities in new textile materials technology R&D, there are some critical issues and some suggestions for improvement:

• The abstract mentions the analysis of 94,525 invention patents but does not describe the specific methodology used for this analysis

• The abstract should succinctly point out the novel aspects of the research, and main contributions to the literature or practice

• While the introduction sets the context and significance of the study, it fails to explicitly state the research gap

• The introduction does not clearly outline the research methods used in the study. This is a critical component as it provides readers with an understanding of how the research was conducted and ensures transparency. It does not mention similar studies or previous research in the field

• The introduction should clearly define the research objectives. While the goals are somewhat implied, a concise statement of the specific objectives would enhance clarity. Also, including a clear hypothesis or specific research questions can provide a focused direction for the study and make it easier for readers to understand what the research aims to investigate

• The introduction does not provide an overview of the structure of the article. Mentioning the structure helps guide the reader through the paper, making it easier to follow the argument and understand the flow of the research

• The literature review, while well-structured, offers a broad range of research areas but lacks in-depth analysis of existing studies. Specifically, it could benefit from a more rigorous discussion of research on competitive situations, technical opportunities in new material technology, and policy mechanisms for innovation in new textile materials.

• The methodology section is well-defined and detailed, ensuring that the research method is transparent and replicable. However, the abstract and introduction could be improved by briefly mentioning the research method to give readers a more comprehensive overview from the outset.

• To effectively communicate the connection between patent analysis and policy implications, the study should provide a clearer explanation of how the trends of countries and policy recommendations were drawn from the patent data analysis

• articulate the novel ideas, concepts, or frameworks you introduce to the existing body of knowledge within the field. What are the theoretical contributions of the paper? What are its practical contributions?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Raja Muhammad Waseem Ullah Khan

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Sina Tarighi

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0321923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321923.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


12 Sep 2024

Dear Reviewers

We are truly grateful to yours and other reviewers’ critical comments and thoughtful suggestions on our manuscript (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-23639). We have revised the manuscript and responded to these questions point-by-point based on the comments and suggestions. Additionally, the list of changes is given below. Now we are submitting this revised version after making improvements. If you have any other questions about this manuscript, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Reviewer #1: In the manuscript titled “Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D” the researcher took the 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world as the research object and explored the competitive situation, technical opportunities, and layout characteristics of technology research and development in this field. .

Here are some points in the current study that need to be addressed for a better understanding of the research.

1. What was the criteria of selecting the patents to be added in this study? And how you have collected the data? Please explain the research methodology in detail.

Response 1: Thanks for your suggestions, the data used in this article are from the PatSnap patent database (https:// analytics.zhihuiya.com/). As for new textile material technology, according to the research results of Slubik et al. , Papaspyrides et al. , and Sibiescu et al. , it is mainly defined as high-tech fibers, high-tech fabrics, and high-tech industrial textiles produced by adopting high-tech processes and equipment in recent years. Its content involves textiles, clothing, fibers, spinning, weaving and knitting, etc. The International Patent Classification (IPC) includes two categories: D (textile) and A41 (garment). First you select the new material industry in the national strategic emerging industry classification, and combine it with the international patent classification number D01 fiber, D02 yarn, D03 weaving, D04 knitting, D05 sewing, and D06 fabric treatment, etc.

The process of collecting the data was as follows: firstly, select the patent receiving offices in 170 countries and regions around the world provided by the PatSnap system, and then download the data that meets the requirements according to the criteria. Statistical analysis is carried out by patentometrics to obtain the data of major patentees, technical field and core patents, and finally, the technical opportunities of new textile materials in the world are analyzed through the model.

2. What is meant by “D03 weaving, D04 weaving”, what is the difference between both? Please also explain the term D first then use the 1,2 and 3 etc.

Response 2:Thanks for your suggestions, we're so sorry that D03(weaving) and D04(knitting) are not the same, it’s our mistake, we've revised in the manuscript. According to the International Patent Classification(IPC), the technical fields related to patents are divided into eight parts: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H. Textile technology, together with papermaking technology, is in the Part D, including D01-D07. D01-D06 represents the aspects of raw materials, spinning, weaving, knitting, sewing and fabric treatment. Please see the official reference URL, https://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/.

3. The abbreviations are not explained in the text clearly, specifically used in table 4. Please explain.

Response 3: Thanks for your suggestions, we have added explanations and descriptions of abbreviations in the manuscript, in particular in Table 4, and highlighted them in different colours.

4. You never mentioned that the patent includes local patents, or these are only international patents?

Response 4: Thanks for your suggestions, we selected the patent receiving offices in 170 countries and regions around the world provided by the PatSnap system, and data includes both local patents and international patents.

5. The literature review should be improved. Some other important studies must be added to this research. Below some important studies are referred to enrich the literature review.

• A review of artificial intelligence applications in apparel industry

(DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1880088)

Response 5: Thanks for your suggestions, we have enriched the literature review by adding some other important studies, including references to some important studies recommended by reviewers, and the revisions have been highlighted in different colours.

Reviewer #2: The article titled aims to analyze the global landscape of research and development (R&D) in new textile materials technology. It focuses on 94,525 invention patents related to new textile materials, examining the competitive positions, technical opportunities, and R&D layout characteristics. Although the article presents a valuable analysis of the global competitive situation and technical opportunities in new textile materials technology R&D, there are some critical issues and some suggestions for improvement:

• The abstract mentions the analysis of 94,525 invention patents but does not describe the specific methodology used for this analysis

Response 1: Thanks for your suggestions, we've added the specific methodology used in the abstract, and the changes have been highlighted in different colors. It reads as follows:

This paper takes the 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world as the research object,and uses competitive situation calculation and patentometrics to explore the competitive situation, technical opportunities,and layout characteristics of technology R&D (Research and Development) in this field.

• The abstract should succinctly point out the novel aspects of the research, and main contributions to the literature or practice

Response 2: Thanks for your suggestions, we've added the novel aspects of the research and main contributions to the literature or practice in the abstract, and the changes have been highlighted in different colors. It reads as follows:

This study effectively supplement the theoretical analysis of competitive situation and technical opportunities of technology R&D, and enrich and expand the empirical research on international new textile materials technology and innovation.

• While the introduction sets the context and significance of the study, it fails to explicitly state the research gap

Response 3: Thanks for your suggestions, we've added the research gap in the introduction, and the changes have been highlighted in different colors. It reads as follows:

However, there is a lack of research of the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D, and the empirical study on international new textile materials technology and innovation can provide a more accurate and comprehensive panoramic analysis, serving a reference for the government's science and technology innovation policy formulation, technology layout and R&D. Therefore, this paper attempts to supplement the existing research in terms of research object and research content, to potentially fill the gap of existing research.

• The introduction does not clearly outline the research methods used in the study. This is a critical component as it provides readers with an understanding of how the research was conducted and ensures transparency. It does not mention similar studies or previous research in the field

Response 4: Thanks for your suggestions, we've added the research methods used in the study, and mentioned similar studies or previous research in the field. The changes have been highlighted in different colors. It reads as follows:

Patent measurement is a method to comprehensively understand the level,the new emerging clustering technique and trend of industrial technology development, and technology measurement analysis with patentometrics as the main method is one of the effective and practical methods,including examining the innovation activities of firms in the textile and clothing industry[4-6].

• The introduction should clearly define the research objectives. While the goals are somewhat implied, a concise statement of the specific objectives would enhance clarity. Also, including a clear hypothesis or specific research questions can provide a focused direction for the study and make it easier for readers to understand what the research aims to investigate

Response 5: Thanks for your suggestions, we have added specific research questions, and provide a focused direction for the study in the introduction. However, due to the limited space of the manuscript, we're so sorry that we are unable to provide more content.

• The introduction does not provide an overview of the structure of the article. Mentioning the structure helps guide the reader through the paper, making it easier to follow the argument and understand the flow of the research

Response 6: Thanks for your suggestions, the structure of the paper is arranged as follows: Literature Review in Section 2, data sources in Section 3, methods in Section 4, results of empirical analysis in Section 5, discussion and conclusions in Section 6, and finally limitations and future research in Section 7.

• The literature review, while well-structured, offers a broad range of research areas but lacks in-depth analysis of existing studies. Specifically, it could benefit from a more rigorous discussion of research on competitive situations, technical opportunities in new material technology, and policy mechanisms for innovation in new textile materials.

Response 7: Thanks for your suggestions, however, due to the limited space of the manuscript, we're so sorry that we are unable to provide more content.

• The methodology section is well-defined and detailed, ensuring that the research method is transparent and replicable. However, the abstract and introduction could be improved by briefly mentioning the research method to give readers a more comprehensive overview from the outset.

Response 8: Thanks for your suggestions, we have added more content in the abstract and introduction, which give readers a more comprehensive overview from the outset by briefly mentioning the research method.

• To effectively communicate the connection between patent analysis and policy implications, the study should provide a clearer explanation of how the trends of countries and policy recommendations were drawn from the patent data analysis

Response 9: Thanks for your suggestions, We have elaborated on the connection between patent analysis and policy implications in the discussion and conclusions of Section 6. However, due to the limited space of the manuscript, we're so sorry that we are unable to provide more content.

• articulate the novel ideas, concepts, or frameworks you introduce to the existing body of knowledge within the field. What are the theoretical contributions of the paper? What are its practical contributions?

Response 10: Thanks for your suggestions, we've added the theoretical contributions and practical contributions in the introduction. The changes have been highlighted in different colors. It reads as follows:

The possible marginal contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) Supplementation of the research framework. Based on the 94,525 invention patents for new textile material technology in the world as the research object, this paper constructs the the competitive situation, technical opportunities,and layout characteristics of 170 countries and regions around the world patent technology innovation in order to effectively supplement the analytical framework of international technology R&D. (2) Expansion of research methods. This paper uses competitive situation calculation and patentometrics to scientifically explore the characteristic factors of technology R&D ability and technical opportunities so as to enrich and expand the empirical research on international technology innovation and provide policy enlightenment for optimizing regional sustainable development and national R&D innovation.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0321923.s002.docx (26.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Zeashan Khan

12 Nov 2024

PONE-D-24-23639R1Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&DPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 27 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Zeashan Hameed Khan, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

In the revised version, authors have improved the major gaps existing in the first submission. However, the reply to the reviewer's queries are not found satisfactory. Please take it seriously and do not worry about the additional length of the paper in case the explanation is required to be added.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have made improvements to certain sections of the manuscript based on the comments provided. However, it is not acceptable to claim that additional content cannot be added due to "space limitations", especially in response to major comments. Therefore:

A significant issue that remains unaddressed is the need to communicate the connection between patent analysis and its policy implications. The authors should provide a clearer explanation of how the trends observed in different countries were derived from the patent data analysis, as well as the basis for the policy recommendations suggested. Without a clear understanding of the mechanisms involved, readers will struggle to engage with the results.

It is essential that the authors offer a more thorough explanation of the theoretical foundations and their interconnections, even briefly.

Additionally, I suggest that the "data sources" section can be placed under the "methods" category for better coherence and organization

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  sina tarighi

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0321923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321923.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 2


12 Jan 2025

Dear Reviewers

We are truly grateful to yours and other reviewers’ critical comments and thoughtful suggestions on our manuscript (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-23639). We have revised the manuscript and responded to these questions point-by-point based on the comments and suggestions. Additionally, the list of changes is given below. Now we are submitting this revised version after making improvements. If you have any other questions about this manuscript, please do not hesitate to contact me.

1. A significant issue that remains unaddressed is the need to communicate the connection between patent analysis and its policy implications. The authors should provide a clearer explanation of how the trends observed in different countries were derived from the patent data analysis, as well as the basis for the policy recommendations suggested. Without a clear understanding of the mechanisms involved, readers will struggle to engage with the results.

Response 1: Thanks for your suggestions, drawing on the existing research results, we put the mechanism explanation and the basis for the policy recommendations suggested in the theoretical analysis part of the paper.. It reads as follows:

In recent years, technology competition in emerging industries has become increasingly fierce, and more and more scholars have identified the main competitors in specific technology fields from the perspective of patent competition analysis or patent cooperation analysis, and helped innovation subjects to construct patent strategies and plans to achieve the goal of enhancing competitive advantage by tracking the trend of technology development and evaluating the innovation ability of technology[32].With the rapid development of digital technology, the innovation ability of enterprises has become an important measure of national competitiveness. Therefore, the policy influence of different countries and the research suggestions of scholars have also had a positive effect on the decisive factors for innovative subjects to gain competitive advantages in the market, and provide an important reference for the country to formulate relevant technological strategies and promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements[33].

At the same time, as the premise of technology R&D and innovation, technology opportunity research has become a key issue of concern to the state and enterprises, and has important strategic significance for technology competition, market layout, regional innovation and industrial development. Therefore, mining technological opportunities from patent data can not only obtain possible new technologies, or new technologies that are improved on the basis of existing technologies, but also provide enterprises with important R&D intelligence and reference directions through analysis[34-36].

2. It is essential that the authors offer a more thorough explanation of the theoretical foundations and their interconnections, even briefly.

Response 2:Thanks for your suggestions, we have added a separate section of theoretical analysis to the paper, focusing on explanation of the theoretical foundations and their interconnections. It reads as follows:

Theoretical analysis

Patent data mining is the use of patent analysis to extract valuable data information from patent documents, such as the state of industrial technology development, the main areas of technological competition and competitors' technology layout. Through patent competitive intelligence, it helps enterprises understand the industry environment, evaluate themselves and monitor their competitors so as to obtain competitive advantages and potential opportunities[29-31].

In recent years, technology competition in emerging industries has become increasingly fierce, and more and more scholars have identified the main competitors in specific technology fields from the perspective of patent competition analysis or patent cooperation analysis, and helped innovation subjects to construct patent strategies and plans to achieve the goal of enhancing competitive advantage by tracking the trend of technology development and evaluating the innovation ability of technology[32].With the rapid development of digital technology, the innovation ability of enterprises has become an important measure of national competitiveness. Therefore, the policy influence of different countries and the research suggestions of scholars have also had a positive effect on the decisive factors for innovative subjects to gain competitive advantages in the market, and provide an important reference for the country to formulate relevant technological strategies and promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements[33].

At the same time, as the premise of technology R&D and innovation, technology opportunity research has become a key issue of concern to the state and enterprises, and has important strategic significance for technology competition, market layout, regional innovation and industrial development. Therefore, mining technological opportunities from patent data can not only obtain possible new technologies, or new technologies that are improved on the basis of existing technologies, but also provide enterprises with important R&D intelligence and reference directions through analysis[34-36].

To sum up, the continuous innovation of technology will promote the development of the industry, this process on the one hand requires the progress of technology itself, on the other hand, there is also a demand from the market, the two need to reach a technical research and development in the unity of technical and economic possibilities[37]. Therefore, on the basis of existing research, this paper analyzes the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global textile new material technology research and development in the 21st century, in order to provide a useful reference for the forward-looking and strategic research and development layout of the government, industry and enterprise technology innovation.

3. Additionally, I suggest that the "data sources" section can be placed under the "methods" category for better coherence and organization .

Response 3: Thanks for your suggestions, we have placed the "data sources" section under the "methods" category and have moderately adjusted the structure of the paper.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers2025.docx

pone.0321923.s003.docx (28.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Zeashan Khan

31 Jan 2025

PONE-D-24-23639R2Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&DPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 17 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Zeashan Hameed Khan, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The paper has been improved and it can be accepted after minor improvements. Please look at the reviewer's comments carefully. All abbreviations must be explained at their first use.

Figures and Tables must be referenced in the text. Check all references. They must follow the Plos One style with complete information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript titled " Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D" provides valuable insights into the competitive landscape and technical opportunities in the field of textile material innovation. By analyzing 94,525 patents, the study identifies key contributors, technological areas, and trends across major regions, highlighting the global R&D dynamics.

• While the manuscript is rich in data and offers a global perspective, it requires improvements in structure, clarity, and data presentation.

• Additionally, expanding the discussion on limitations and contextualizing findings within existing literature will strengthen its academic contribution.

• Overall, the manuscript has significant potential but requires minor revisions to fully realize its impact.

Here are some points in the current study that need to be addressed for a better understanding of the research.

1. Break the discussion section into sub-sections with clear headings (e.g., "Regional Innovation Trends," "Challenges in China") for better readability.

2. Elaborate on the limitations of the patent database and IP5 scope, explaining how these might affect the comprehensiveness of the findings.

3. Compare the findings with existing studies on textile material innovation to position the work within the broader academic discourse.

4. Revise lengthy and complex sentences to make the manuscript more accessible to a wider audience.

5. Add a subsection with actionable recommendations tailored to different regions or stakeholders.

6. Summarize major findings from the discussion more concisely to avoid repetitive or verbose descriptions.

7. Ensure proper citation of all patent data, government policies, and industrial initiatives mentioned in the manuscript.

8. Emphasize how the findings can inform industry practices, R&D strategies, and policy frameworks.

9. The literature review should be improved. Some other important studies must be added to this research. Below are some important studies that can enrich literature review.

•

• Comparative Geometrical Analysis of In Situ Mechanical Performance of 2-D Woven In-Plane Auxetic Structures (DOI: 10.1520/JTE20230195)

• Numerical Analysis of Binding Yarn Float Length for 3D Auxetic Structures (DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202000440)

• Influence of tetrahedral architectures on fluid transmission and heat retention behaviors of auxetic weaves (DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101946)

• A review of artificial intelligence applications in apparel industry (DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1880088)

• Study of comfort performance of novel car seat design for long drive (DOI: 10.1177/0954407019852279)

• Cellulosic Fillers Extracted from Argyreia Speciose Waste: A Potential Reinforcement for Composites to Enhance Properties (DOI:10.1080/15440478.2020.1856271)

Reviewer #2: I appreciate the effort and responsibility you have demonstrated in addressing the previous comments. Compared to the earlier revision, this version reflects a more thoughtful attempt to clarify key aspects of the study.

However, there remains one crucial issue that still needs to be addressed. My expectation was not just a general theoretical discussion on the link between patent analysis and policy recommendations, but rather a clear and explicit explanation of how the specific findings of your study directly lead to the policy recommendations you propose. In other words, while you have articulated the broader theoretical foundation, the manuscript still lacks a concrete connection between the empirical results and the suggested policies in the conclusion.

This connection is essential for ensuring the validity and impact of your conclusions. Without it, the policy implications may appear disconnected from the actual findings, which could raise concerns about the robustness of the study’s contributions. I strongly encourage you to make this link explicit by demonstrating how the trends and patterns observed in your patent analysis serve as the basis for the policy recommendations you suggest.

I look forward to reviewing the revised version and appreciate your efforts in further refining the manuscript.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  sina tarighi

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0321923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321923.r007

Author response to Decision Letter 3


10 Mar 2025

PLOS ONE Decision: Revision required [PONE-D-24-23639] –

Dear Reviewers

We are truly grateful to yours and other reviewers’ critical comments and thoughtful suggestions on our manuscript (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-23639). We have revised the manuscript and responded to these questions point-by-point based on the comments and suggestions. Additionally, the list of changes is given below. Now we are submitting this revised version after making improvements. If you have any other questions about this manuscript, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Reviewer #1:

1. Break the discussion section into sub-sections with clear headings (e.g., "Regional Innovation Trends," "Challenges in China") for better readability.

Response 1: Thanks for your suggestions, we have added the discussion section into sub-sections with clear headings, it reads below:

. 6. Discussion

The results of this paper are helpful in sorting out the competitive situation and potential technical opportunities of global textile new material technology R&D. Although the existing research objects in the academic community involve many emerging industries and technologies, there is no research on the global competitive situation and technology opportunity analysis of new textile materials. Therefore, this paper attempts to supplement the existing research in terms of research object and research content, to potentially fill the gap of existing research.

6.1 Regional Innovation Trends

The global textile new materials technology innovation is developing rapidly in the direction of high performance, green, intelligence and industrial chain synergy, and around the concept of "revolutionary fibers and textiles", it further integrates interdisciplinary achievements such as nanotechnology and bioengineering to promote the breakthrough of material performance limits. At the same time, digitalization and greening go hand in hand, reshaping the global textile value chain and realizing the transition from "manufacturing" to "intelligent manufacturing". To maintain its global leadership in the field of new materials technology, the United States has set a series of development goals at the comprehensive strategic planning level,including the National Nanotechnology Initiative ( NNI, launched in 2000 ), the Materials Genome Project ( launched in 2011 ), and the National Manufacturing Innovation Network (now known as Manufacturing America) in 2012. It has taken the lead in completing the layout of patented technology research and development and technology opportunity development in the world. Global companies in the chemical industry, advanced materials production, and materials science, represented by Procter & Gamble, Kimberley-Clark Global Ltd., and Dow Global Technologies, provide an important guarantee for the United States to maintain its global leadership position in the development of the new textile materials industry. In addition, Japan's textile new material technology research and development strength is also at the forefront of the world, as early as the 80s and 90s of the last century, the Japanese government began to take a series of measures to promote the development of new material technology, put forward the goal of "focusing on the practicability of new materials, considering the coordinated development of the environment and resources", so it occupies a pivotal international position in the field of cutting-edge materials such as global carbon fiber technology, functional chemical products, new chemical materials, and man-made fibers.

Under the model of full-staff collaboration and innovation that promotes the reform and reorganization of large enterprise groups and encourages the integration of the public and private sectors, South Korea has become an important force in the technical fields of spinning, printing and dyeing, garment production, and textile machinery manufacturing. Since 2012, the government has established policies such as the Nano Convergence 2020 Project, the Third Basic Plan for Science and Technology, and the Korea Future Growth Engines Plan, creating global aramid fiber and new chemical material manufacturers represented by Kolon Industries and LG Chem, which have maintained Korea's global competitiveness in new textile material technology. The development of new textile materials in Europe is similar to that of the United States and Japan, and it attaches great importance to the construction of industrial clusters with its characteristics, establishing and improving the industrial standardization system based on core technology and core manufacturing, and with the intensification of global sustainable development and international trade competition, its new textile material innovation model focuses on industrial demand, emphasizing the added value of textile materials. In 2011, six major technologies, including advanced materials, were identified as key enabling technologies (KETs) for the EU industry, and materials and nanomaterial technology were funded and deployed as important research areas, among which textile new material technology occupies an increasingly important position in the field of EU science and technology development.

6.2 Challenges in China

Although China's textile new material technology R&D started relatively late,it has developed relatively rapidly, and has produced several technological achievements that have reached or approached the international advanced level. However, it still faces multiple challenges, mainly involving technology, industry, market and environment. Firstly, in the R&D and application of key technologies and equipment such as new fiber materials, advanced textile products, green manufacturing, and intelligent manufacturing, there is a relatively large gap with developed countries such as the United States and Japan, and the problem of "big but not strong, big but not excellent" is still more prominent, and it is hoped that the country will pay attention to the coherent support and long-term layout of the policy, as well as strengthen international technological innovation and cooperation, encourage domestic enterprises to pay attention to the core patent layout and technological innovation, and actively participate in international competition to enhance the competitiveness of enterprise products and technologies. Secondly, the low conversion rate of achievements of universities and scientific research institutes, the lack of R&D investment of enterprises and other industrial chain coordination and industrialization problems, the dependence on imports of high-end textile equipment and testing instruments, and the pressure of environmental protection and sustainable development restricts the overall upgrading of the whole industrial chain. Finally, the performance evaluation of new materials and the integration of testing standards with international standards need to be further improved, which will affect the market promotion and the competition pattern of application scenarios in emerging fields such as aerospace, defense, and medical.

In summary, with the impact of COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019) and global geopolitics,countries are paying more and more attention to upgrading supply chain security, so they continue to increase national-level strategic support and investment and begin to promote the reform and restructuring of large enterprises to play a centralized role. Although the United States and Japan still have obvious advantages, the technology gap between various regions is narrowing, and the competition in the field of new textile material technology has entered a white-hot stage.

2. Elaborate on the limitations of the patent database and IP5 scope, explaining how these might affect the comprehensiveness of the findings.

Response 2: Thanks for your suggestions, we have added the limitation explaination of the patent database and IP5 scope, which reads as follows:

Although this paper has reference significance and value for the research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D, there are some limitations. Due to limitations of the patent database and IP5 scope, which may not capture all forms of technology R&D collaboration, as some collaborations may not result in patent applications. In the future,more complete global data will be available to compare countries for further and more comprehensive analyses.

3. Compare the findings with existing studies on textile material innovation to position the work within the broader academic discourse .

Response 3: Thanks for your suggestions, we have compared the findings with existing studies on textile material innovation, which reads as follows:

4. Revise lengthy and complex sentences to make the manuscript more accessible to a wider audience.

Response 4: Thanks for your suggestions, we have revised lengthy and complex sentences to make the manuscript more accessible to a wider audience, all changes are shown in different colors in the paper. .

5. Add a subsection with actionable recommendations tailored to different regions or stakeholders.

Response 5: Thanks for your suggestions, we have added a subsection with actionable recommendations tailored to different regions or stakeholders, which reads as follows:

6.3 Actionable recommendations

In view of the characteristics of industrial base, resource endowment and policy orientation in different regions, it is suggested that the advantages of each other, and the relevant and feasible R&D strategies for global textile new materials technology are as follows:

(1) In China, promote cooperation between universities and leading enterprises, focusing on the R&D and innovation of high-performance fibers, green materials and degradable textiles. (2) In Japan, we will strengthen the role of Toray, Teijin and other enterprises in technological refinement and high-end material leadership, establish a circular industrial chain of chemical fiber, textile, and consumer brands, and realize sustainable innovation in the circular economy. (3) In South Korea, vigorously develop the application of smart textiles and consumption scenarios, and expand the commercial market of functional materials for international companies such as Samsung Electronics and LG Chem. (4) In the United States, promote disruptive technology incubation and interdisciplinary collaborative development and innovation, promote the application and breakthrough of bioengineering materials in the textile field, and establish a traceability system for textile raw materials based on the blockchain. (5) In Europe, we will continue to strengthen the construction of sustainable standards and recycling systems, promote globally recognized standardization and certification systems, and realize the industrial cluster effect of regional industries such as high-end textiles in Italy, machinery manufacturing in Germany and bio-based materials in Northern Europe.

6. Summarize major findings from the discussion more concisely to avoid repetitive or verbose descriptions.

Response 6: Thanks for your suggestions, we have summarized major findings from the discussion more concisely to avoid repetitive or verbose descriptions, all changes are shown in different colors in the paper. .

7. Ensure proper citation of all patent data, government policies, and industrial initiatives mentioned in the manuscript.

Response 7: Thanks for your suggestions, we have ensured proper citation of all patent data, government policies, and industrial initiatives mentioned in the manuscript.

8. Emphasize how the findings can inform industry practices, R&D strategies, and policy frameworks.

Response 8: Thanks for your suggestions, we have emphasized how the findings can inform industry practices, R&D strategies, and policy frameworks, which reads as follows in the Introduction of paper:

The significance of this study is as follows: (1) Laying a theoretical foundation for future emerging technology cooperation in R&D and innovation. (2) Emphasize the findings can inform industry practices, R&D strategies, and policy frameworks. (3) Through the empirical analysis of global patent data, it provides a reference and basis for the government to rationally allocate innovation resources and formulate relevant policies, which has practical significance and application value for the decision-making of enterprise technology R&D departments.

9. The literature review should be improved. Some other important studies must be added to this research. Below are some important studies that can enrich literature review.

• Comparative Geometrical Analysis of In Situ Mechanical Performance of 2-D Woven In-Plane Auxetic Structures (DOI: 10.1520/JTE20230195)

• Numerical Analysis of Binding Yarn Float Length for 3D Auxetic Structures (DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202000440)

• Influence of tetrahedral architectures on fluid transmission and heat retention behaviors of auxetic weaves (DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101946)

• A review of artificial intelligence applications in apparel industry (DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1880088)

• Study of comfort performance of novel car seat design for long drive (DOI: 10.1177/0954407019852279)

• Cellulosic Fillers Extracted from Argyreia Speciose Waste: A Potential Reinforcement for Composites to Enhance Properties (DOI:10.1080/15440478.2020.1856271)

Response 9: Thanks for your suggestions, we have improved the literature review, which reads as follows:

2. Literature Review

At present, scholars' research on the technological innovation of new textile materials mainly focuses on three aspects: (1) In the field of textile raw material technology, such as herbal biomass, natural dyes, and extracted cellulose and fiber extraction[7], which are widely used in the development of high-performance, smart textiles, and multi-functional materials field[8, 9], which is to meet the needs of the industry and the market, and improve the added value and competitiveness of textiles. (2) Case studies focusing on technological innovations in new textile materials, such as the use of eco-friendly technologies to produce textiles with the required physicochemical, woven auxetic fabrics and mechanical properties field[10-12],as well as scalable nanofabrication technologies to tailor smart fabrics [13] and natural fabrics [14], to meet various potential application needs. (3) Analysis of the policy mechanism of technological innovation of new textile materials, evaluates the expected impact of new technologies on topics such as the environment, automotive, aerospace, and ballistic areas and human security[15-17], and emphasizes the important role of policy guidance and supervision in the sustainable development of technology. In addition, artificial intelligence (AI) technology is also gaining more and more attention in the apparel industries, and researchers are constantly exploring and optimizing the use of AI techniques in a range of industrial applications[18, 19]. Since patents are synonymous with innovative activities, the analysis of new textile material technology through patents has also attracted the attention of many scholars[20].

Core patents reflect the value of patented technologies, and the corresponding technologies or products can occupy market share and obtain high economic benefits by their competitiveness, so they have a high degree of technological competitive advantage and market economic value[21, 22].At present, academic research focuses more on the technical perspective, pointing out that the core patents are the technical patents that must be used to manufacture a certain technical field or a certain product without circumvention. Some scholars also believe that core patents are patents or patent portfolios with an important economic and strategic value that are in a key position of innovation, influential, and inevitable in a certain technical field[23-25].Based on this research, this paper defines core patents as patents that are in a fundamental position in the technological evolution route,absolutely leading and contributing to the subsequent development of the technology with a high reference value for epitaxial technology.

The research results on technological opportunit

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers202503.docx

pone.0321923.s004.docx (41.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Zeashan Khan

14 Mar 2025

Research on the competitive situation and technical opportunities of global new textile materials technology R&D

PONE-D-24-23639R3

Dear Dr. wang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Zeashan Hameed Khan, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The paper has been improved significantly and it can be accepted in the present form.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I appreciate the effort and responsibility you have demonstrated in addressing the previous

comments. Compared to the earlier revision, this version reflects a more thoughtful attempt to

clarify key aspects of the study.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  sina trighi

**********

Acceptance letter

Zeashan Khan

PONE-D-24-23639R3

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. wang,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Zeashan Hameed Khan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0321923.s002.docx (26.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers2025.docx

    pone.0321923.s003.docx (28.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers202503.docx

    pone.0321923.s004.docx (41.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data used in this paper was obtained from the PatSnap database (https://analytics.zhihuiya.com/).


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES