Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Oct;129(2):535–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.535

Variance of Neutral Genetic Variances within and between Populations for a Quantitative Character

Z B Zeng 1, C C Cockerham 1
PMCID: PMC1204642  PMID: 1743490

Abstract

The variances of genetic variances within and between finite populations were systematically studied using a general multiple allele model with mutation in terms of identity by descent measures. We partitioned the genetic variances into components corresponding to genetic variances and covariances within and between loci. We also analyzed the sampling variance. Both transient and equilibrium results were derived exactly and the results can be used in diverse applications. For the genetic variance within populations, σ(w)(2), the coefficient of variation can be very well approximated as & for a normal distribution of allelic effects, ignoring recurrent mutation in the absence of linkage, where m is the number of loci, N is the effective population size, n is the sample size, θ(l(0)) is the initial identity by descent measure of two genes within populations and t is the generation number. The first term is due to genic variance, the second due to linkage disequilibrium, and third due to sampling. In the short term, the variation is predominantly due to linkage disequilibrium and sampling; but in the long term it can be largely due to genic variance. At equilibrium with mutation & where u is the mutation rate. The genetic variance between populations is a parameter. Variance arises only among sample estimates due to finite sampling of populations and individuals. The coefficient of variation for sample genetic variance between populations, σ(b)(2), can be generally approximated as & when the number of loci is large where S is the number of sampling populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avery P. J., Hill W. G. Variability in genetic parameters among small populations. Genet Res. 1977 Jun;29(3):193–213. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300017286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bulmer M. G. The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study. Genet Res. 1976 Oct;28(2):101–117. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockerham C. C., Tachida H. Evolution and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation by mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6205–6209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cockerham C. C., Weir B. S. Variance of actual inbreeding. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Feb;23(1):85–109. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lynch M. Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):791–807. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lynch M. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137–148. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Group inbreeding with two linked loci. Genetics. 1969 Nov;63(3):711–742. doi: 10.1093/genetics/63.3.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weir B. S., Hill W. G. Effect of mating structure on variation in linkage disequilibrium. Genetics. 1980 Jun;95(2):477–488. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weir B. S., Reynolds J., Dodds K. G. The variance of sample heterozygosity. Theor Popul Biol. 1990 Feb;37(1):235–253. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(90)90038-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES