Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Oct;129(2):563–572. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.563

A Source of Small Repeats in Genomic DNA

D Fieldhouse 1, B Golding 1
PMCID: PMC1204644  PMID: 1743492

Abstract

The processes of spontaneous mutation are known to be influenced by neighboring DNA. Imperfect nearby repeats in the neighboring DNA have been observed to mutate to form perfect repeats. The repeats may be either direct or inverted. Such a mutational process should create perfect direct and inverted repeats in intergenic DNA. A larger than expected number of direct repeats has generally been observed in a wide range of species in both coding and noncoding DNA. Simulations are carried out to determine how this process might influence the repetitive structure of genomic DNA. These simulations show that small repeats created by this kind of a mutational process can explain the excess number of repeats in intergenic DNA. The simulations suggest that this mechanism may be a common cause of mutations, including single-base changes. The influences of the distance between imperfect repeats and of their degree of similarity are investigated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (845.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albertini A. M., Hofer M., Calos M. P., Miller J. H. On the formation of spontaneous deletions: the importance of short sequence homologies in the generation of large deletions. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):319–328. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90148-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cambareri E. B., Jensen B. C., Schabtach E., Selker E. U. Repeat-induced G-C to A-T mutations in Neurospora. Science. 1989 Jun 30;244(4912):1571–1575. doi: 10.1126/science.2544994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Golding G. B. Multiple substitutions create biased estimates of divergence times and small increases in the variance to mean ratio. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Jun;58(Pt 3):331–339. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hartnett C., Neidle E. L., Ngai K. L., Ornston L. N. DNA sequences of genes encoding Acinetobacter calcoaceticus protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase: evidence indicating shuffling of genes and of DNA sequences within genes during their evolutionary divergence. J Bacteriol. 1990 Feb;172(2):956–966. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.2.956-966.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karlin S., Ghandour G., Ost F., Tavare S., Korn L. J. New approaches for computer analysis of nucleic acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5660–5664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunkel T. A., Bebenek K. Recent studies of the fidelity of DNA synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Nov 10;951(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(88)90020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levinson G., Gutman G. A. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):203–221. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Papanicolaou C., Ripley L. S. Polymerase-specific differences in the DNA intermediates of frameshift mutagenesis. In vitro synthesis errors of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and its large fragment derivative. J Mol Biol. 1989 May 20;207(2):335–353. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90258-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Petruska J., Goodman M. F., Boosalis M. S., Sowers L. C., Cheong C., Tinoco I., Jr Comparison between DNA melting thermodynamics and DNA polymerase fidelity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6252–6256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ripley L. S., Glickman B. W. Unique self-complementarity of palindromic sequences provides DNA structural intermediates for mutation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):851–861. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Streisinger G., Okada Y., Emrich J., Newton J., Tsugita A., Terzaghi E., Inouye M. Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. This paper is dedicated to Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky on the occasion of his 66th birthday. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:77–84. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sueoka N. Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2653–2657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walsh J. B. Sequence-dependent gene conversion: can duplicated genes diverge fast enough to escape conversion? Genetics. 1987 Nov;117(3):543–557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.3.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilson A. C., Carlson S. S., White T. J. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:573–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES