Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Jun;131(2):493–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.493

Effects of Partial Inbreeding on Fixation Rates and Variation of Mutant Genes

A Caballero 1, W G Hill 1
PMCID: PMC1205021  PMID: 1644283

Abstract

Diffusion methods were used to investigate the fixation probability, average time until fixation and extinction, and cumulative heterozygosity and genetic variance for single mutant genes in finite populations with partial inbreeding. The critical parameters in the approximation are the coefficient of inbreeding due to nonrandom mating (F) and the effective population size (N(e)), which also depends on F and the variance of family size. For large Ns, the fixation probability (u) is u = 2(N(e)/N)s (F + h - Fh), where N is the population census, s is the coefficient of selection of the mutant homozygote and h is the coefficient of dominance. For Poisson family size (independent Poisson distributions of selfed and nonselfed offspring with partial selfing, and independent Poisson distributions of male and female numbers with partial sib mating), N(e) = N/(1 + F), and the time until fixation is approximately equal to N(e)/N times the time to fixation with random mating, but this relation does not hold, however, for other distributions of family size. The cumulative nonadditive variance until fixation or loss for dominant genes is reduced with increasing F while for recessive genes it is increased with intermediate values of F. The average time until extinction of deleterious mutations is reduced by increasing F. This reduction, when expressed as a proportion, is approximately independent of the initial gene frequency as well as the selective disadvantage if this is large.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caballero A., Hill W. G. Effective size of nonrandom mating populations. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):909–916. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caballero A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 May;128(1):89–102. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Falconer D. S. A note on Fisher's 'average effect' and 'average excess'. Genet Res. 1985 Dec;46(3):337–347. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300022825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hill W. G. Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet Res. 1982 Dec;40(3):255–278. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300019145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill W. G., Rasbash J. Models of long-term artificial selection in finite population with recurrent mutation. Genet Res. 1986 Oct;48(2):125–131. doi: 10.1017/s001667230002485x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KIMURA M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura M., Ohta T. The Average Number of Generations until Fixation of a Mutant Gene in a Finite Population. Genetics. 1969 Mar;61(3):763–771. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.3.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M., Ota T. The average number of generations until extinction of an individual mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics. 1969 Nov;63(3):701–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/63.3.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maruyama T. On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1970 Apr;15(2):221–225. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300001543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pollak E. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):353–360. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pollak E. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. II. Partial sib mating. Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):303–311. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.1.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Robertson A. The Effect of Inbreeding on the Variation Due to Recessive Genes. Genetics. 1952 Mar;37(2):189–207. doi: 10.1093/genetics/37.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Mixed self and random mating at two loci. Genet Res. 1973 Jun;21(3):247–262. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300013446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES