Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Feb;133(2):149–158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.149

Meiotic Nondisjunction and Recombination of Chromosome III and Homologous Fragments in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

M Goldway 1, T Arbel 1, G Simchen 1
PMCID: PMC1205306  PMID: 8436265

Abstract

A yeast strain, in which nondisjunction of chromosome III at the first-meiotic division could be assayed, was constructed. Using chromosome fragmentation plasmids, chromosomal fragments (CFs) were derived in isogenic strains from six sites along chromosome III and one site on chromosome VII. Whereas the presence of the CFs derived from chromosome III increased considerably the meiosis I nondisjunction of that chromosome, the CF derived from chromosome VII had no effect on chromosome III segregation. The effects of the chromosome III-derived fragments were not linearly related to fragment length. Two regions, one of 12 kb in size located at the left end of the chromosome, and the other of 5 kb, located at the center of the right arm, were found to have profound effects on chromosome III nondisjunction. Most disomics arising from meioses in strains containing chromosome III CFs did not contain the CF; thus it appears that the two chromosome III homologs had segregated away from the CF. Among the disomics, recombination between the homologous chromosomes III was lower than expected from the genetic distance, while recombination between one of the chromosomes III and the fragment was frequent. We suggest that there are sites along the chromosome that are more involved than others in the pairing of homologous chromosomes and that the pairing between fragment and homologs involves recombination among these latter elements.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carpenter A. T. Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and the initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays. 1987 May;6(5):232–236. doi: 10.1002/bies.950060510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke L., Carbon J. Isolation of a yeast centromere and construction of functional small circular chromosomes. Nature. 1980 Oct 9;287(5782):504–509. doi: 10.1038/287504a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donahue T. F., Farabaugh P. J., Fink G. R. The nucleotide sequence of the HIS4 region of yeast. Gene. 1982 Apr;18(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90055-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldway M., Sherman A., Zenvirth D., Arbel T., Simchen G. A short chromosomal region with major roles in yeast chromosome III meiotic disjunction, recombination and double strand breaks. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):159–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawley R. S. Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. Genetics. 1980 Mar;94(3):625–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herman R. K., Kari C. K. Recombination between small X chromosome duplications and the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):723–737. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hieter P., Mann C., Snyder M., Davis R. W. Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):381–392. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones L. R., Harden K. K., Bragg D. S., Robinson J. L. Influence of age, sex, lactational state and exogenous growth hormone on erythrocyte UMP synthase in dairy cattle. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1986;84(4):489–495. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(86)90112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindsley D L, Sandler L. The Meiotic Behavior of Grossly Deleted X Chromosomes in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1958 May;43(3):547–563. doi: 10.1093/genetics/43.3.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKee B. D., Karpen G. H. Drosophila ribosomal RNA genes function as an X-Y pairing site during male meiosis. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90215-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKim K. S., Howell A. M., Rose A. M. The effects of translocations on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):987–1001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murray A. W., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Chromosome length controls mitotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):529–536. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90284-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Newlon C. S., Lipchitz L. R., Collins I., Deshpande A., Devenish R. J., Green R. P., Klein H. L., Palzkill T. G., Ren R. B., Synn S. Analysis of a circular derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III: a physical map and identification and location of ARS elements. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):343–357. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenbluth R. E., Johnsen R. C., Baillie D. L. Pairing for recombination in LGV of Caenorhabditis elegans: a model based on recombination in deficiency heterozygotes. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):615–625. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roth R., Fogel S. A system selective for yeast mutants deficient in meiotic recombination. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;112(4):295–305. doi: 10.1007/BF00334431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz D. C., Cantor C. R. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):67–75. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Surosky R. T., Tye B. K. Meiotic disjunction of homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is directed by pairing and recombination of the chromosome arms but not by pairing of the centromeres. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):273–287. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vollrath D., Davis R. W., Connelly C., Hieter P. Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6027–6031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES