Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Nov;135(3):843–854. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.843

Effect of a Founder Event on Variation in the Genetic Sex-Determining System of the Fire Ant Solenopsis Invicta

K G Ross 1, E L Vargo 1, L Keller 1, J C Trager 1
PMCID: PMC1205724  PMID: 8293983

Abstract

Effects of a recent founder event on genetic diversity in wild populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta were studied, with particular attention given to the genetic sex-determining system. Diploid males are far more common relative to haploid males in introduced populations than in native populations of fire ants, and queens that produce diploid males account for a significantly larger proportion of the mated queens in introduced than in native populations. Differences between native and introduced populations in attributes of the mating systems (i.e., queen mating frequency or level of inbreeding) can be excluded as factors contributing to these different levels of diploid male production. Thus, we conclude that diploid males have increased in frequency in introduced populations because of a loss of allelic diversity at the sex-determining locus (loci). This loss of sex alleles has generated a substantial increase in the estimated segregational genetic load associated with production of sterile diploid males in introduced populations over the load in native populations. The loss of allelic diversity in the sex-determining system in introduced S. invicta is paralleled by a loss of electrophoretically detectable rare alleles at protein-encoding loci. Such concordance between these different types of markers is predicted because each of the many sex alleles present in the native populations is expected to be rare. Estimates of expected heterozygosity (H(exp)) based on 76 electrophoretic loci do not differ significantly between the native and introduced fire ant populations, illustrating the lack of sensitivity of this measure for detecting many types of bottlenecks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams J., Rothman E. D., Kerr W. E., Paulino Z. L. Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetics. 1977 Jul;86(3):583–596. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.3.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant E. H., McCommas S. A., Combs L. M. The Effect of an Experimental Bottleneck upon Quantitative Genetic Variation in the Housefly. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1191–1211. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.4.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne J. A. Genetics and speciation. Nature. 1992 Feb 6;355(6360):511–515. doi: 10.1038/355511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Keller L., Ross K. G. Phenotypic basis of reproductive success in a social insect: genetic and social determinants. Science. 1993 May 21;260(5111):1107–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5111.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Laidlaw H H, Gomes F P, Kerr W E. Estimation of the Number of Lethal Alleles in a Panmitic Population of Apis Mellifera L. Genetics. 1956 Mar;41(2):179–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/41.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCommas S. A., Bryant E. H. Loss of electrophoretic variation in serially bottlenecked populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1990 Jun;64(Pt 3):315–321. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1990.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Brien S. J., Roelke M. E., Marker L., Newman A., Winkler C. A., Meltzer D., Colly L., Evermann J. F., Bush M., Wildt D. E. Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah. Science. 1985 Mar 22;227(4693):1428–1434. doi: 10.1126/science.2983425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Brien S. J., Wildt D. E., Bush M., Caro T. M., FitzGibbon C., Aggundey I., Leakey R. E. East African cheetahs: evidence for two population bottlenecks? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(2):508–511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.2.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Page R. E., Jr The evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). Genetics. 1980 Sep;96(1):263–273. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Powell J. R., Richmond R. C. Flounder effects and linkage disequilibria in experimental populations of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1663–1665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Templeton A. R. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Whiting P W. Multiple Alleles in Complementary Sex Determination of Habrobracon. Genetics. 1943 Sep;28(5):365–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.5.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yokoyama S., Nei M. Population dynamics of sex-determining alleles in honey bees and self-incompatibility alleles in plants. Genetics. 1979 Mar;91(3):609–626. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES