Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Oct;138(2):445–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.445

Distribution of Exchanges upon Homologous Recombination of Exogenous DNA in Xenopus Laevis Oocytes

D Carroll 1, C W Lehman 1, S Jeong-Yu 1, P Dohrmann 1, R J Dawson 1, J K Trautman 1
PMCID: PMC1206161  PMID: 7828826

Abstract

Homologous recombination between DNA molecules injected into Xenopus oocyte nuclei was investigated by examining the recovery of information from differentially marked parental sequences. The injected recombination substrate was a linear DNA with terminal direct repeats of 1246 bp; one repeat differed from the other by eight single base-pair substitutions, distributed throughout the region of homology, each of which created or destroyed a restriction enzyme site. Recombination products were recovered and analyzed for their content of the diagnostic sites, either directly by Southern blot-hybridization or after cloning in bacteria. The majority (76%) of the cloned products appeared to be the result of simple exchanges-i.e., there was one sharp transition from sequences derived from one parent to sequences derived from the other. These simple exchanges were concentrated near the ends of the homologous interval and, thus, near the sites of the original molecular ends. Placing marked sites on only one side of the homologous overlap showed that marker recovery was governed largely by the positions of the molecular ends and not by the markers themselves. When a terminal nonhomology was present at one end of the substrate, the yield of recombinants was sharply decreased, but the pattern of exchanges was not affected, suggesting that products from end-blocked substrates arise by the same recombination pathway. Because of considerable evidence supporting a nonconservative, resection-annealing mechanism for recombination in oocytes, we interpret the distribution of exchanges as resulting from long-patch repair of extensive heteroduplex intermediates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (6.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abastado J. P., Darche S., Godeau F., Cami B., Kourilsky P. Intramolecular recombination between partially homologous sequences in Escherichia coli and Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(18):6496–6500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.18.6496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson R. A., Eliason S. L. Recombination of homologous DNA fragments transfected into mammalian cells occurs predominantly by terminal pairing. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Sep;6(9):3246–3252. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.9.3246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop D. K., Williamson M. S., Fogel S., Kolodner R. D. The role of heteroduplex correction in gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1987 Jul 23;328(6128):362–364. doi: 10.1038/328362a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science. 1987 Sep 18;237(4821):1459–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.2820060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks P., Dohet C., Almouzni G., Méchali M., Radman M. Mismatch repair involving localized DNA synthesis in extracts of Xenopus eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(12):4425–4429. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA intermediates of extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):400–406. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desautels L., Brouillette S., Wallenburg J., Belmaaza A., Gusew N., Trudel P., Chartrand P. Characterization of nonconservative homologous junctions in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;10(12):6613–6618. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.12.6613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grzesiuk E., Carroll D. Recombination of DNAs in Xenopus oocytes based on short homologous overlaps. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):971–985. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurdon J. B., Melton D. A. Gene transfer in amphibian eggs and oocytes. Annu Rev Genet. 1981;15:189–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.15.120181.001201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hays J. B., Ackerman E. J., Pang Q. S. Rapid and apparently error-prone excision repair of nonreplicating UV-irradiated plasmids in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;10(7):3505–3511. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.7.3505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holmes J., Jr, Clark S., Modrich P. Strand-specific mismatch correction in nuclear extracts of human and Drosophila melanogaster cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(15):5837–5841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeong-Yu S., Carroll D. Effect of terminal nonhomologies on homologous recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;12(12):5426–5437. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kunkel T. A., Roberts J. D., Zakour R. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:367–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):160–164. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Längle-Rouault F., Maenhaut-Michel G., Radman M. GATC sequences, DNA nicks and the MutH function in Escherichia coli mismatch repair. EMBO J. 1987 Apr;6(4):1121–1127. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04867.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maryon E., Carroll D. Characterization of recombination intermediates from DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes: evidence for a nonconservative mechanism of homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3278–3287. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maryon E., Carroll D. Involvement of single-stranded tails in homologous recombination of DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3268–3277. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pont-Kingdon G., Dawson R. J., Carroll D. Intermediates in extrachromosomal homologous recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes: characterization by electron microscopy. EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):23–34. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05628.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Russel M., Kidd S., Kelley M. R. An improved filamentous helper phage for generating single-stranded plasmid DNA. Gene. 1986;45(3):333–338. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ryoji M., Worcel A. Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vivo studies. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Varlet I., Radman M., Brooks P. DNA mismatch repair in Xenopus egg extracts: repair efficiency and DNA repair synthesis for all single base-pair mismatches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(20):7883–7887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.7883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES