Abstract
Inconsistencies between equations for the effective population size of populations with separate sexes obtained by two different approaches are explained. One approach, which is the most common in the literature, is based on the assumption that the sex of the progeny cannot be identified. The second approach incorporates identification of the sexes of both parents and offspring. The approaches lead to identical expressions for effective size under some situations, such as Poisson distributions of offspring numbers. In general, however, the first approach gives incorrect answers, which become particularly severe for sex-linked genes, because then only numbers of daughters of males are relevant. Predictions of the effective size for sex-linked genes are illustrated for different systems of mating.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (405.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- CROW J. F., ROBERTS W. C. Inbreeding and homozygosis in bees. Genetics. 1950 Nov;35(6):612–621. doi: 10.1093/genetics/35.6.612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G. A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):317–322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollak E. The effective population size of an age-structured population with a sex-linked locus. Math Biosci. 1990 Sep;101(1):121–130. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(90)90105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]