Abstract
Experimental lines of Drosophila melanogaster derived from a natural population, which had been isolated in the laboratory for ~70 generations, were crossed to determine if the expression of additive, dominance and epistatic genetic variation in development time and viability was associated with the environment. No association was found between the level of additive genetic effects and environmental value for either trait, but nonadditive genetic effects increased at both extremes of the environmental range for development time. The expression of high levels of dominance and epistatic genetic variation at environmental extremes may be a general expectation for some traits. The disruption of the epistatic gene complexes in the parental lines resulted in hybrid breakdown toward faster development and there was some indication of hybrid breakdown toward higher viability. A combination of genetic drift and natural selection had therefore resulted in different epistatic gene complexes being selected after ~70 generations from a common genetic base. After crossing, the hybrid populations were observed for 10 generations. Epistasis contributed on average 12 hr in development time. Fluctuating asymmetry in sternopleural bristle number also evolved in the hybrid populations, decreasing by >18% in the first seven generations after hybridization.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (972.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bradley B. P. Developmental stability opf Drosophila melanogaster under artificial and natural selection in constant and fluctuating environments. Genetics. 1980 Aug;95(4):1033–1042. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.4.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KING J. C. Evidence for the integration of the gene pool from studies of DDT resistance in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:311–317. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitgawa O. Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. IV. Relative viability. Genet Res. 1967 Dec;10(3):303–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mather K. Complementary and duplicate gene interactions in biometrical genetics. Heredity (Edinb) 1967 Feb;22(1):97–103. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1967.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moll R H, Lonnquist J H, Fortuno J V, Johnson E C. The Relationship of Heterosis and Genetic Divergence in Maize. Genetics. 1965 Jul;52(1):139–144. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parsons P. A. Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1990 May;65(2):131–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1990.tb01186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vetukhiv M. Viability of Hybrids Between Local Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Jan;39(1):30–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]