Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Apr;142(4):1129–1145. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1129

Genetic Analysis of a Morphological Shape Difference in the Male Genitalia of Drosophila Simulans and D. Mauritiana

J Liu 1, J M Mercer 1, L F Stam 1, G C Gibson 1, Z B Zeng 1, C C Laurie 1
PMCID: PMC1207113  PMID: 8846893

Abstract

Two closely related species of Drosophila, D. simulans and D. mauritiana, differ markedly in morphology of the posterior lobe of the male genital arch. Both size and shape aspects of lobe variation can be quantified by a morphometric descriptor based on elliptical Fourier and principal components analyses. The genetic architecture of this quantitative trait (PC1) was investigated by hybridizing inbred lines to produce two backcross populations of ~200 individuals each, which were analyzed jointly by a composite interval mapping procedure with the aid of 18 marker loci. The parental lines show a large difference in PC1 (30.4 environmental standard deviations), and the markers account for >80% of the phenotypic variation in backcross populations. Eight of 15 intervals analyzed show convincing evidence of quantitative trait loci (QTL), and the range of estimated QTL effects is 5.7-15.9% of the parental difference (1.7-4.8 environmental standard deviations). These estimates may represent the joint effects of multiple QTL within a single interval (which averaged 23 cM in length). Although there is some evidence of partial dominance of mauritiana alleles and for epistasis, the pattern of inheritance is largely additive.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coyne J. A. Genetic basis of male sterility in hybrids between two closely related species of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4444–4447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coyne J. A., Rux J., David J. R. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet Res. 1991 Apr;57(2):113–122. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300029177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doebley J., Stec A. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):285–295. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gotwals P. J., Fristrom J. W. Three neighboring genes interact with the Broad-Complex and the Stubble-stubbloid locus to affect imaginal disc morphogenesis in Drosophila. Genetics. 1991 Apr;127(4):747–759. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.4.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grether M. E., Abrams J. M., Agapite J., White K., Steller H. The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes Dev. 1995 Jul 15;9(14):1694–1708. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.14.1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hey J., Kliman R. M. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):804–822. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang C., Zeng Z. B. Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1111–1127. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laurie C. C., Stam L. F. The effect of an intronic polymorphism on alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):379–385. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lemeunier F., Ashburner M. A. Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 May 18;193(1112):275–294. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1976.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Long A. D., Mullaney S. L., Reid L. A., Fry J. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1273–1291. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Palopoli M. F., Wu C. I. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):329–341. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perez D. E., Wu C. I. Further characterization of the Odysseus locus of hybrid sterility in Drosophila: one gene is not enough. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):201–206. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sax K. The Association of Size Differences with Seed-Coat Pattern and Pigmentation in PHASEOLUS VULGARIS. Genetics. 1923 Nov;8(6):552–560. doi: 10.1093/genetics/8.6.552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith J. M. The genetics of stasis and punctuation. Annu Rev Genet. 1983;17:11–25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.000303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Templeton A. R. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu C. I., Beckenbach A. T. Evidence for Extensive Genetic Differentiation between the Sex-Ratio and the Standard Arrangement of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and D. PERSIMILIS and Identification of Hybrid Sterility Factors. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):71–86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zeng Z. B. Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):987–1001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zeng Z. B., Houle D., Cockerham C. C. How informative is Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character? Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):235–247. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES