ABSTRACT
Aims
Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts tissue homeostasis, leading to persistent neuroinflammation and scar formation that severely impedes functional recovery. Current therapeutic approaches are insufficient to address these challenges. In this study, we investigated whether exogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) can modulate neuroinflammatory responses and remodel the injury microenvironment to promote tissue repair and restore motor function following SCI.
Methods
T10 crush SCI was induced in mice, followed by daily intraperitoneal administration of the H2S donor anethole trithione (ADT). Immunofluorescence staining, tissue clearing, western blotting, and behavioral assessments were performed to evaluate scar formation, vascular regeneration, neuronal survival, and motor function.
Results
ADT‐based H2S therapy significantly promoted wound healing, inhibited scar formation, enhanced vascular regeneration, and protected residual neurons and axons from secondary injury. Mechanistically, H2S suppressed microglial proliferation and activation, promoting their polarization toward an anti‐inflammatory phenotype and alleviating neuroinflammation. Consequently, motor function recovery was markedly improved.
Conclusion
H2S modulates microglial activation and mitigates neuroinflammation, establishing a permissive microenvironment for SCI repair and significantly enhancing motor function recovery. Given ADT's established clinical safety and its effective gasotransmitter properties, our findings underscore its immediate translational potential for treating SCI.
Keywords: functional recovery, hydrogen sulfide, neuroinflammation, scar formation, spinal cord injury
Hydrogen sulfide remodels the injury microenvironment by inhibiting scar formation, enhancing vascular regeneration and neuronal survival, and reducing neuroinflammation, ultimately improving motor functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

1. Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a common traumatic disorder typically caused by external impacts on the spine, leading to vertebral fractures or dislocations that compress or transect the spinal cord. This results in partial or complete loss of sensory and motor functions below the level of injury [1, 2, 3]. The pathophysiological process of SCI extends beyond the initial mechanical injury and involves a complex cascade of secondary injury events. Secondary injury comprises various cellular and molecular mechanisms, including vascular damage, cell death, inflammatory responses, axonal dieback, and scar formation [3, 4]. Following SCI, the microenvironment undergoes profound changes, encompassing diverse cell types and their secreted factors [5, 6]. The injury microenvironment plays a crucial role in the repair process, as it can either promote tissue regeneration or hinder recovery [7].
Following SCI, cells within the damaged area release various pro‐inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF‐α) and interleukins (IL‐1β, IL‐6), which trigger a local inflammatory response and recruit immune cells, including microglia and macrophages. While inflammation facilitates the clearance of cellular debris and prevents infection, prolonged inflammation creates a microenvironment that is detrimental to neuronal survival and axonal regeneration [8, 9]. Additionally, a dense scar forms at the injury site, comprising a fibrotic core surrounded by a glial scar [10]. This scar, a critical component of the injury microenvironment, has a dual role in SCI repair. On one hand, scar formation supports tissue self‐repair; on the other, excessive scar accumulation forms a physical and molecular barrier that obstructs neural regeneration [11, 12, 13, 14]. Thus, modulating the inflammatory response and remodeling the injury microenvironment represent promising strategies for promoting neural regeneration and functional recovery.
In recent years, the role of gaseous signaling molecules, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), nitric oxide (NO), and carbon monoxide (CO), in the central nervous system (CNS) has gained considerable attention [15, 16, 17]. As endogenous signaling mediators, these gaseous molecules perform diverse biological functions, including regulating inflammation, mitigating oxidative stress, and enhancing cell survival [18, 19]. Among them, H2S has demonstrated neuroprotective effects in several CNS diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and traumatic brain injury [20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. Research indicates that H2S plays a crucial role in maintaining blood–brain barrier integrity, protecting neurons, promoting myelin regeneration and axonal repair, and preserving mitochondrial function [25, 26]. The role of H2S in SCI has also garnered significant research interest [27]. Studies reveal that the H2S donor NaHS can reduce blood‐spinal cord barrier permeability by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy, thereby facilitating SCI recovery [28]. Moreover, the H2S donor GYY4137 has been shown to reduce neuronal loss and alleviate motor dysfunction following ischemia‐reperfusion [29]. Despite growing evidence supporting the therapeutic potential of H2S in SCI, the mechanisms by which it modulates the injury microenvironment remain unclear.
ADT [5‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐3H‐1,2‐dithiole‐3‐thione] is a widely used slow‐release H2S donor with notable advantages over other H2S donors due to its stable and gradual release profile, which enhances its efficacy for prolonged therapeutic applications [30, 31]. Studies have shown that ADT effectively protects neurons from glutamate‐induced oxidative toxicity by gradually releasing H2S, thereby minimizing oxidative damage and neuronal apoptosis [30]. Additionally, in a cerebral ischemia model, ADT demonstrated anti‐inflammatory and neuroprotective effects by inhibiting neuroinflammation, reducing infarct size, and improving neurological outcomes [32]. These findings support ADT's neuroprotective potential as a promising candidate for SCI treatment. This study aims to investigate the regulatory effects of H2S on the SCI microenvironment through intraperitoneal administration of ADT. The findings will elucidate novel therapeutic targets for H2S in SCI and pave the way for developing innovative strategies to enhance SCI recovery.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
Wild‐type C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Aldh1l1‐P2A‐iCre mice with a C57BL/6JGpt genetic background and Rosa26(R26)‐CAG‐LSL‐tdTomato(TdT) mice with a B6J;B6N genetic background were obtained from GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). These strains were crossed to generate the Aldh1l1iCre::R26‐TdT transgenic mice. In this model, the Aldh1l1 promoter drives the specific expression of iCre in astrocytes, thereby activating TdT for precise astrocyte labeling. All animals used in the study were adult males, 8–10 weeks of age, with body weights between 20 and 25 g. Animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions, including a 12 h light/dark cycle, an ambient temperature of 22°C ± 2°C, and a relative humidity of 40%–60%. Food and water were provided ad libitum. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University.
2.2. SCI Model and Treatment
Mice were anesthetized with 2% (w/v) Avertin, followed by a T10 laminectomy to expose the spinal cord. A complete spinal cord crush injury was induced at the T10 level using No. 5 Dumont forceps with a compression duration of 2 s. In the sham group, only a T10 laminectomy was performed without subsequent SCI to ensure the same level of exposure as the injury group. After surgery, the muscle and skin layers were sutured, and mice were placed on a warming pad to recover fully. Postoperatively, the bladder was manually expressed twice daily to facilitate urination until euthanasia.
Mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups receiving daily intraperitoneal injections of ADT (10, 20, or 40 mg/kg) or a vehicle solution (10% dimethyl sulfoxide in corn oil). Treatments began 1 day post‐SCI and continued daily until euthanasia.
2.3. Quantification of H2S in Injured Mouse Spinal Cord
To verify that the H2S released by ADT reaches and exerts its effects at the SCI site, we employed H2S‐activatable nanoprobes (ZNNPs) to directly detect the H2S signal at the lesion site. At 2, 8, and 24 h following the initial ADT administration, the laminectomy site was re‐exposed to reveal the lesion area, and the ZNNPs (1 mg/mL, 50 μL) were carefully applied to the SCI site. After a 30 min incubation period, fluorescence images were captured using an IVIS imaging system with an excitation wavelength of 640 nm and an emission wavelength of 720 nm [33].
2.4. Behavioral Analysis
2.4.1. Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) Behavioral Analysis
Hindlimb locomotor recovery was assessed using the BMS in an open‐field test at 1, 3, and 7 days post‐SCI, and subsequently on a weekly basis until day 56. A detailed description of the BMS methodology can be found in the literature [34]. Two independent researchers, blinded to the treatment groups, performed the BMS scoring.
2.4.2. Motion Trajectory Analysis
Prior to testing, small adhesive markers were affixed to the hip, knee, ankle, and foot joints of the mouse's right hindlimb. Digital imaging was used to capture the movement of the right hindlimb during locomotion, and the motion trajectory was reconstructed from the recorded data.
2.4.3. Electromyography (EMG) Recordings
EMG recordings were performed 28 days post‐SCI. A recording electrode was implanted in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of the right hindlimb and connected to an EMG recording module (BIOPAC, USA) via the Biopac MP150 data acquisition system [35]. The TA muscle myoelectric burst was detected while the mice moved on a body weight‐supporting treadmill (90% support, 2 m·min−1; SANS, China).
2.5. Tissue Clearing Technique
Tissues were cleared using the CUBIC (Clear, Unobstructed Brain Imaging Cocktails and Computational Analysis) method, following previously described protocols and using specific clearing reagents to enhance transparency [36, 37]. Mice were perfused transcardially with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde, and tissues were post‐fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde. Prior to clearing, the tissues were thoroughly washed with PBS.
For spinal cord clearing, tissues were immersed in 15 g of reagent‐1, prepared with 12.5 g urea (Sigma, Germany), 12.5 g N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (Sigma, Germany), 17.5 mL distilled water, and 7.5 g Triton X‐100 (MasterTech, USA), at 37°C under gentle agitation for 2 days. The solution was then refreshed, and the sample was immersed in a fresh volume of reagent‐1 for an additional 2 days. Following clearing, the spinal cord tissues were rinsed multiple times with PBS at room temperature under gentle agitation, followed by immersion in 20% (w/v) sucrose in PBS. The samples were degassed and immersed in 15 g of reagent‐2, consisting of 25 g sucrose (Sinopharm, China), 12.5 g urea, 7.5 mL distilled water, 5 g 2,2′,2″‐nitrilotriethanol (Aladdin, China), and 400 μL of 10% Triton X‐100, for 1–2 days.
Cleared spinal cord tissues were imaged using a confocal microscope (LSM700; Zeiss, Germany). Three‐dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the spinal cord and lesion sites were generated using the Surface tool in Imaris.
2.6. Immunohistochemistry
Mice were perfused transcardially with PBS, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde, and tissues were post‐fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde. The tissues were then washed with PBS under gentle agitation and sequentially immersed in 20% and 30% (w/v) sucrose solutions. Parasagittal spinal cord sections were prepared for immunostaining using a cryostat. Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and incubated with tissue sections at 4°C overnight at the following concentrations: Mouse anti‐GFAP‐Cy3 (1:500, Sigma‐Aldrich, C9205), rabbit anti‐PDGFR‐β (1:500, Abcam, ab32570), rabbit anti‐fibronectin (1:200, Abcam, ab2413), goat anti‐CD31 (1:500, R&D Systems, AF3628), rabbit anti‐NeuN (1:500, Abcam, ab177487), rabbit anti‐NF (1:200, Abcam, ab207176), rabbit anti‐Iba1 (1:500, Wako, 019‐19741), rat anti‐Ki67 (1:500, invitrogen, 14‐5698‐82), rat anti‐CD68 (1:500, Bio‐Rad, MCA1957), rabbit anti‐iNOS (1:200, Abcam, ab15323), and rabbit anti‐Arg1 (1:500, GeneTex, GTX109242). After incubation with primary antibodies, sections were washed in PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with Alexa Fluor 488‐ or 647‐conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500, Abcam) diluted in 1% BSA/PBS. Sections were washed again with PBS prior to imaging. Confocal imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM700 microscope, and image processing and exporting were completed with Zen software (Zeiss, Germany).
2.7. Western Blotting
Protein extracts were isolated from 2‐mm spinal cord tissue segments centered on the lesion site 7 days post‐SCI. Western blotting was performed according to established protocols, including SDS‐PAGE, electroblotting, and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection. Primary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:1000 and included the following: Rabbit anti‐PDGFR‐β (Abcam, ab32570), rabbit anti‐fibronectin (Abcam, ab2413), rabbit anti‐TGF‐β (Abclonal, A2124), rabbit anti‐TNF‐α (Abclonal, A20851), rabbit anti‐IL‐1β (Abclonal, A20527), rabbit anti‐Arg1 (GeneTex, GTX109242), and rabbit anti‐iNOS (Abcam, ab15323). Secondary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:5000 and included rabbit anti‐HRP (Fdbio, FDG007). Rabbit anti‐β‐tubulin (1:5000, Fdbio, FD0064) was used as the internal loading control. Immunoreactive bands were semi‐quantitatively analyzed using ImageJ software. Analysis included background subtraction and normalization to the loading vehicle group.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (Version 8.0.1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Normality was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Comparisons between two groups were conducted with Student's t–test, whereas multiple group comparisons were analyzed using one‐way or two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for all analyses.
3. Results
3.1. Detection of H2S at the Injury Site in the Mouse Spinal Cord
Mice were administered daily intraperitoneal injections of either the H2S donor ADT or vehicle (10% dimethyl sulfoxide in corn oil) beginning on day 1 post‐SCI and continuing until euthanasia to ensure sustained H2S delivery and therapeutic efficacy. In vivo fluorescence imaging was used to visualize H2S signals at the injury site. Based on previous research [38], we selected ADT doses of 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg to identify the optimal concentration for therapeutic efficacy. Research has shown that ADT releases H2S with an in vivo half‐life of approximately 8–24 h [30]. Accordingly, we evaluated H2S release at different time points (2, 8, and 24 h post‐administration) following the first ADT administration (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 1.

In vivo fluorescence imaging of H2S at the SCI site in mice after ADT administration. (A) Experimental design showing daily intraperitoneal injection of ADT (10, 20, or 40 mg/kg, 100 μL) or vehicle solution (10% dimethyl sulfoxide in corn oil, 100 μL) starting on day 1 post‐SCI until euthanasia, along with the imaging time points. (B) Representative fluorescence images showing H2S signals at the SCI site at 2, 8, and 24 h after ADT administration in the vehicle and ADT groups (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg). Arrows indicate the precise location of the H2S signals at the SCI site. (C) Quantitative analysis of H2S fluorescence intensity at the SCI site in the vehicle and ADT groups (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3 per group. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post hoc test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.
Representative fluorescence images (Figure 1B) taken at various time points after administration revealed distinct H2S signals at the injury sites across the different ADT dosage groups. At 2 h post‐administration, the 20 mg/kg ADT group exhibited the highest fluorescence signal, whereas the 10 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg groups did not show significant differences compared to the vehicle group. At 8 h, the 20 mg/kg group still displayed the strongest signal, while the 10 mg/kg group remained similar to the vehicle, and the 40 mg/kg group exhibited a lower signal than the vehicle group. At 24 h, fluorescence signals in all ADT‐treated groups were significantly higher than those in the vehicle group, indicating a marked increase in H2S levels at the injury site due to ADT treatment (Figure 1C).
In summary, these findings indicate that intraperitoneal injection of ADT facilitates the sustained release of H2S and targeted delivery to the SCI site. Among the tested doses, 20 mg/kg demonstrated the most effective H2S release and distribution, exhibiting the highest fluorescence signal at early time points (2 and 8 h) and maintaining superior signal levels at 24 h, which highlight its potential therapeutic advantages.
3.2. H2S Promoted Wound Healing and Inhibited Scar Formation After SCI
We next evaluated the effects of H2S on wound healing and scar formation following SCI. Spinal cord tissue imaging was performed on days 7 and 28 post‐SCI to evaluate wound healing, while assessments of scar formation were conducted on day 28 (Figure 2A). Lesioned spinal cords were initially visualized using high‐resolution digital surgical microscopy. The imaging results revealed that the ADT‐treated groups displayed significantly better tissue closure and enhanced surface tissue continuity compared to the vehicle group (Figure 2B). Wound healing was further assessed using the CUBIC spinal cord clearing method in combination with Aldh1l1iCre::R26‐TdT transgenic mice, which label the majority of astrocytes, enabling precise 3D reconstruction of the lesion area at 28 days post‐SCI. In the vehicle group, a pronounced cavity was observed at the lesion site, whereas ADT treatment markedly reduced the lesion area (Figure 2C). Compared with the vehicle group, lesion area was reduced by 47.64% (p < 0.01), 71.33% (p < 0.001), and 53.79% (p < 0.001) in the 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg groups, respectively (Figure 2D). Notably, the 20 mg/kg group exhibited the most pronounced reduction. A comparative analysis of the lesion area reduction percentages relative to the vehicle group revealed that the 20 mg/kg group exhibited a reduction that was 23.69% greater than that in the 10 mg/kg group and 20.39% greater than that in the 40 mg/kg group (Figure 2E). These findings suggest that the 20 mg/kg dose, which showed the greatest reduction with significant differences, is likely to represent the optimal dose for treatment.
FIGURE 2.

H2S promotes wound healing and reduces scar formation after SCI. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B) Representative high‐resolution digital surgical microscopy images of the SCI site in the vehicle, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT groups, at 7 and 28 days post‐SCI. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images and 3D reconstructions of the lesion area in the vehicle, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT groups 28 days post‐SCI. (D) Quantification of the lesion area in the vehicle, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT groups. (E) Percentage reduction in lesion area in the 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg groups relative to the vehicle group. (F, G) Representative images of five parasagittal spinal cord sections centered on the midline, stained with GFAP (red) and either PDGFR‐β (green) or fibronectin (green), in the vehicle, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT groups 28 days post‐SCI. (H) Quantitative analysis of the PDGFR‐β+ area in the vehicle, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT groups. (I) Quantitative analysis of the fibronectin+ area in the vehicle, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT groups. (J) Western blot analysis of PDGFR‐β and fibronectin expression at 28 days post‐SCI. (K, L) Quantitative analyses of the expression levels of PDGFR‐β (K) and fibronectin (L). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 per group (D, E, H, I); n = 3 per group (K, L). Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post hoc test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.
Scar formation involves a complex interplay of various cell types, including pericytes and fibroblasts, which contribute to the production and organization of extracellular matrix components. To assess scar formation, we performed co‐immunostaining for GFAP and either PDGFR‐β or fibronectin at 28 days post‐SCI (Figure 2F,G). The results demonstrated a marked reduction in the lesion area following ADT treatment, consistent with the 3D reconstruction findings (Figures 2C,D,F,G and S1). Quantification of pericyte‐ and fibroblast‐containing regions was carried out across five consecutive sagittal sections aligned at the midline. Our results demonstrated that the PDGFR‐β+ area was significantly reduced in all ADT‐treated groups compared to the vehicle group. Specifically, the reductions in PDGFR‐β+ area for the 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT‐treated groups were 38.65% (p < 0.01), 52.11% (p < 0.001), and 31.72% (p < 0.05), respectively. Furthermore, the 20 mg/kg group exhibited the greatest reduction, with decreases that were 13.46% greater than that in the 10 mg/kg group and 20.39% greater than that in the 40 mg/kg group (Figure 2H). Similarly, compared to the vehicle group, the fibronectin+ areas in the 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT‐treated groups were reduced by 40.82% (p < 0.01), 49.03% (p < 0.001), and 47.96% (p < 0.001), respectively. The 20 mg/kg group exhibited the greatest reduction, with decreases that were 8.20% greater than that in the 10 mg/kg group and 1.06% greater than that in the 40 mg/kg group (Figure 2I). Additionally, western blot analysis further assessed the expression of PDGFR‐β and fibronectin in the lesion area at 28 days post‐SCI (Figure 2J). The expression levels of both PDGFR‐β and fibronectin were significantly reduced in the 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg ADT‐treated groups compared to the vehicle group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively, for PDGFR‐β in Figure 2K; p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.01, respectively, for fibronectin in Figure 2L). These findings further confirm the inhibitory effects of H2S on scar formation.
These findings suggest that H2S promotes wound healing and inhibits scar formation after SCI. Moreover, the overall therapeutic trend indicates that the 20 mg/kg ADT dose affords the most effective repair.
3.3. H2S Promoted Vascular Regeneration and Neuronal Survival After SCI
After SCI, microvascular structures are disrupted by inflammatory cell infiltration, resulting in secondary injury, neuronal death, and impaired axonal regeneration [1, 3]. Vascular regeneration is critical for SCI repair, as it supplies nutrients to neurons, thereby promoting neuronal survival and axonal regeneration [39]. Previous studies have demonstrated that H2S promotes angiogenesis and protects neural cells [40, 41, 42, 43]. Building on our previous findings that H2S significantly reduced tissue damage, we administered a 20 mg/kg dose of ADT to further investigate its potential effects on vascular regeneration and neuroprotection following SCI (Figure 3A).
FIGURE 3.

H2S enhances vascular regeneration and protects neurons and axons 28 days post‐SCI. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of spinal cord sagittal sections co‐stained with GFAP (red) and CD31 (green) in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. B1 and B2 show higher‐magnification images of the boxed areas in (B). (C) Quantitative analysis of the CD31+ area at the lesion site. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of spinal cord sagittal sections co‐stained with GFAP (red) and NeuN (green) in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. D1–D4 show higher‐magnification images of the boxed areas in (D). (E) Schematic diagram of the spinal cord depicting the lesion core and eight adjacent zones (at the lesion site) used for NeuN+ neuron quantification post‐SCI. (F) Quantitative analysis of the total number of NeuN+ neurons. (G) Quantitative analysis of NeuN+ neurons in zones surrounding the lesion boundary. (H) Representative immunofluorescence images of spinal cord sagittal sections co‐stained with GFAP (red) and NF (green) in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. H1 and H2 show higher‐magnification images of the boxed areas in (H). (I) Quantitative analysis of the NF+ area at the lesion site. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 per group. Statistical analyses included an unpaired two‐tailed Student's t‐test for (C), (F), and (I), and a two‐way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test for multiple comparisons for (G). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
CD31 is a well‐established endothelial cell marker used to assess vascular regeneration [44]. Immunofluorescence analysis of spinal cord sections revealed a significant increase in the CD31+ area at the lesion site 28 days post‐SCI in the 20 mg/kg ADT group compared to the vehicle group (Figure 3B,C). These results suggest that H2S treatment significantly enhanced vessel density in the 20 mg/kg ADT group, indicating its substantial impact on vascular regeneration following SCI. To evaluate neuronal survival, we stained the neuronal marker NeuN and counted neurons within regions at various distances from the lesion center (Figure 3D,E). The results revealed that a greater number of neurons survived in the 20 mg/kg ADT group (Figure 3F), with a significantly higher neuron density observed in the 300–600 μm range from the lesion center compared to the vehicle group (Figure 3G). These findings suggest that H2S effectively protected the neurons around the lesion site. Then, we stained the axonal fibers with anti‐NF in the spinal sections (Figure 3H). We found that more NF+ axons at the lesion site were present in the 20 mg/kg ADT group compared to the vehicle group (Figure 3I). Overall, these results suggest that H2S improves the microenvironment following SCI, thereby promoting vascular regeneration and protecting neurons and axons.
3.4. H2S Inhibited Microglial Proliferation and Accumulation After SCI
Microglia, the primary innate immune cells in the (CNS), play a pivotal role in the inflammatory response following SCI [45]. To further investigate the effects of H2S, we analyzed the dynamic changes in microglia following SCI. Immunofluorescence staining for the microglial marker Iba1 and the cell proliferation marker Ki67 was performed at 4, 7, 14, and 28 days post‐SCI (Figure 4A–E). The results revealed that 20 mg/kg ADT treatment significantly reduced the total number of Iba1+ microglial cells at multiple time points post‐SCI (Figure 4F), indicating that H2S effectively suppressed microglial accumulation and reduced the overall number of microglia in the lesion area.
FIGURE 4.

H2S reduces microglial accumulation at the lesion site after SCI. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B–E) Representative immunofluorescence images of spinal cord sagittal sections co‐stained for GFAP (red), Iba1 (green), and Ki67 (blue) in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups 4, 7, 14, and 28 days post‐SCI. B1, B2, C1, C2, D1, D2, E1, and E2 show higher‐magnification images of boxed areas in (B–E). (F) Quantitative analysis of Iba1+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 4, 7, 14, and 28 days post‐SCI. (G) Quantitative analysis of Iba1+Ki67+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 4, 7, 14, and 28 days post‐SCI. (H) Percentage of Iba1+ microglia undergoing proliferation in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 4, 7, 14, and 28 days post‐SCI. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 per group. Statistical analyses were performed using two‐way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.
Additionally, Iba1+Ki67+ double‐positive microglial cells, representing proliferating microglia, were analyzed. Consistent with previous studies showing that microglial proliferation peaks at 7 days post‐SCI [46], our findings revealed that H2S significantly inhibited microglial proliferation during this peak period (Figure 4G,H). These results suggest that H2S reduces the number of microglia in the lesion area by suppressing their proliferation during the critical phase, thereby mitigating excessive inflammatory responses and protecting neural tissue.
3.5. H2S Promoted Anti‐Inflammatory Microglial Polarization and Alleviated Neuroinflammation After SCI
To further investigate the effect of H2S on microglia and its potential to alleviate neuroinflammation following SCI, we assessed microglial activation and polarization at 7 days post‐SCI (Figure 5A). Given the crucial role of anti‐inflammatory microglia in tissue repair [47], we sought to determine whether H2S facilitates microglial polarization toward an anti‐inflammatory phenotype. To this end, we performed double‐labeling of the activated microglia marker CD68 alongside either the anti‐inflammatory marker Arg1 or the pro‐inflammatory marker iNOS (Figure 5B). At 7 days post‐SCI, the 20 mg/kg ADT group exhibited significantly fewer CD68+ activated microglia compared to the vehicle group (Figure 5C). Moreover, the 20 mg/kg ADT group displayed a higher number of Arg1+ microglia and a lower number of iNOS+ microglia relative to the vehicle group (Figure 5D,F). We further quantified the proportion of CD68+ microglia co‐expressing Arg1 or iNOS. In the 20 mg/kg ADT group, Arg1+CD68+ microglia accounted for 18.64% of the total CD68+ microglia at the lesion site, representing a 9.75% increase compared to the vehicle group (Figure 5E). Conversely, iNOS +CD68+ microglia accounted for only 1.77% of the total CD68+ microglia, reflecting a 5.83% reduction compared to the vehicle group (Figure 5G). These findings demonstrate that H2S significantly promotes the polarization of microglia toward an anti‐inflammatory phenotype.
FIGURE 5.

H2S alleviates neuroinflammation after SCI. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of spinal cord sagittal sections co‐stained for GFAP (red), CD68 (green), and Arg1 (blue) or iNOS (blue) in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups7 days post‐SCI. B1, B2, B3, and B4 show higher‐magnification images of boxed areas in (B). (C) Quantification of CD68+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 7 days post‐SCI. (D) Quantification of Arg1+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 7 days post‐SCI. (E) Quantification of the ratio of Arg1+CD68+ to CD68+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 7 days post‐SCI. (F) Quantification of iNOS+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 7 days post‐SCI. (G) Quantification of the ratio of iNOS+CD68+ to CD68+ microglia in the vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups at 7 days post‐SCI. (H) Western blot analysis of Arg1, iNOS, TGF‐β, IL‐1β, and TNF‐α expression at the lesion site 7 days post‐SCI. (I–M) Quantitative analyses of the expression levels of Arg1 (I), iNOS (J), TGF‐β (K), IL‐1β (L), and TNF‐α (M) at the lesion site. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 per group (C–G); n = 3 per group (I–M). Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired two‐tailed Student's t test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Western blotting analysis further confirmed that, at the lesion site on day 7 post‐SCI, the expression of Arg1 was significantly upregulated, while the expression of iNOS was downregulated in the 20 mg/kg ADT group (Figure 5H–J). To further evaluate whether the 20 mg/kg ADT treatment alleviates the neuroinflammatory environment induced by SCI, we analyzed the expression of inflammation‐associated proteins in lesioned spinal tissues via Western blotting (Figure 5H). The results demonstrated that, in the 20 mg/kg ADT‐treated group, the levels of the pro‐inflammatory markers IL‐1β and TNF‐α were significantly reduced (Figure 5L,M), while the level of the anti‐inflammatory marker TGF‐β was notably increased (Figure 5K). These findings suggest that H2S mitigates neuroinflammation and improves the inflammatory microenvironment post‐SCI by promoting the phenotypic transition of microglia and reducing the release of pro‐inflammatory factors.
3.6. H2S Improved Motor Function After SCI
Our study revealed that H2S exerts neuroprotective effects by modulating microglial activity, thereby improving the injury microenvironment and promoting tissue repair following SCI. To further evaluate whether H2S facilitates motor function recovery, we performed comprehensive behavioral assessments at 28 days post‐SCI, including BMS scoring, motion trajectory analysis, and EMG recordings (Figure 6A).
FIGURE 6.

H2S improves motor function in mice after SCI. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B) BMS scores of mice at the indicated times post‐SCI. (C) Example stick diagrams of hindlimb movements in the sham, vehicle, and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. (D) Ankle angle degree curves in the sham, vehicle, and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. (E) Quantification of ankle angles in the sham, vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. (F) EMGs of the TA muscles in the sham, vehicle, and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. (G) Quantification of the average duration of a single TA burst in EMG in the sham, vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. (H) Quantification of the maximum amplitude of EMG bursts in the sham, vehicle and 20 mg/kg ADT groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 10 per group (B); n = 5 per group (E, G, H). Statistical analyses were performed using one‐way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post hoc test (E, G, H) or two‐way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test for multiple comparisons (B). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.
Motor function was assessed through BMS scoring at multiple time points, including days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and up to day 56 post‐SCI. The results showed significantly higher BMS scores in the 20 mg/kg ADT group compared to the vehicle group, indicating that H2S positively influences motor function recovery (Figure 6B). Motion trajectory analysis revealed that, compared to sham‐operated mice, the vehicle group exhibited minimal autonomous hindlimb movement and limited ankle joint activity. In contrast, mice treated with 20 mg/kg ADT demonstrated substantial autonomous hindlimb movement, with ankle joint flexion closely resembling that of the sham group (Figure 6C–E). Additionally, EMG activity of the right hindlimb TA muscle was analyzed at 28 days post‐SCI (Figure 6F). The results indicated that the 20 mg/kg ADT group exhibited a significant increase in EMG burst amplitude and a marked reduction in the duration of individual EMG signals compared to the vehicle group (Figure 6G,H).
Importantly, Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney confirmed that a 20 mg/kg ADT intraperitoneal injection did not induce significant long‐term toxicity in mice (Figure S2). Together, these findings demonstrate that H2S not only enhances motor function recovery following SCI but also exhibits a favorable safety profile, highlighting its promising potential for clinical application.
4. Discussion
This study provides compelling evidence for the multifaceted neuroprotective effects of H2S in SCI repair. Our data demonstrate that H2S effectively remodels the injury microenvironment, thereby creating favorable conditions for motor function recovery. Specifically, H2S not only significantly inhibits scar formation, promotes local angiogenesis and the survival of residual neurons and axons, but also suppresses the excessive proliferation and activation of microglia, driving them toward an anti‐inflammatory, reparative phenotype that alleviates neuroinflammation. These findings largely align with previous reports and further support the critical role of H2S in reducing secondary injury, promoting tissue repair, and supporting neural function recovery.
Current studies on H2S in SCI remain relatively limited, and its neuroprotective mechanisms are not yet fully elucidated. Previous research has utilized H2S‐releasing nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (e.g., ATB‐346) to concurrently inhibit cyclooxygenase and release H2S, which significantly mitigates the inflammatory response and secondary tissue damage following SCI, thereby accelerating motor function recovery [48]. Another study employed a rapidly releasing donor (e.g., NaHS) to enhance the integrity of the blood–spinal cord barrier, reduce endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy, and promote functional recovery [28]. Building on these findings, our study further explored the regulatory effects of H2S on microglia and demonstrated that H2S promotes their polarization toward an anti‐inflammatory, reparative phenotype, thereby revealing a novel mechanism of immune modulation and microenvironment remodeling. In addition, we observed that H2S facilitates angiogenesis, further supporting its protective effect on the blood–spinal cord barrier. Recently, research utilizing the slow‐releasing H2S donor GYY4137 proposed that H2S modulates PANoptosis to inhibit neuronal death, offering novel molecular targets and strategies for treating SCI and related ischemia/reperfusion injuries [29]. Our study further substantiates the neuroprotective effects of H2S on neurons and neural fibers in SCI. Notably, after ADT treatment, the number of neurons and neural fibers adjacent to the injury site increased significantly, which may contribute to functional recovery. Recent studies combining H2S with biomaterials such as hydrogels have further confirmed the potential therapeutic role of H2S in SCI. Local delivery of H2S, in conjunction with the specific biological properties of biomaterials, can effectively ameliorate the post‐SCI inflammatory microenvironment and facilitate neural regeneration and functional recovery [49, 50]. In comparison, although intraperitoneal injection of ADT delivers H2S to the SCI site and exerts neuroprotective effects, its efficacy in promoting targeted axonal regeneration requires further optimization.
ADT is widely used in clinical practice for liver protection and has a well‐established safety profile. In recent years, ADT has been repurposed as a slow‐release H2S donor capable of continuously and stably releasing H2S. Using in vivo fluorescence imaging, we detected H2S levels at the SCI site following intraperitoneal injection of ADT and demonstrated that a dose of 20 mg/kg effectively sustains H2S release. Our study systematically evaluated the reparative effects of H2S on scar inhibition, vascular reconstruction, neuroprotection, and inflammation modulation, thereby providing a comprehensive assessment of its overall improvement of the SCI microenvironment. However, whether these key regulatory effects are interrelated and synergistically remodel the injury microenvironment warrants further investigation.
Following SCI, excessive scar formation is a major factor impeding axonal regeneration and functional recovery. This process involves complex interactions among reactive astrocytes, microglia, pericytes, fibroblasts, and the extracellular matrix. These cells secrete inflammatory mediators and chemokines and engage in direct cell–cell interactions to regulate fibrosis and glial scarring. Although these processes initially protect the injured tissue, they ultimately hinder neural regeneration during the chronic phase [11]. Targeting these cells and their interactions is therefore considered a promising strategy for improving SCI repair. Previous studies have shown that systemic administration of microtubule‐stabilizing and antimitotic drugs can effectively inhibit fibroblast migration, reduce scar formation, and promote axonal regeneration [51, 52], while diminishing pericyte‐mediated scarring has also been shown to benefit sensorimotor function [53]. During these processes, microglia may cooperate with pericytes and fibroblasts through direct or indirect signaling to limit immune cell infiltration while preserving tissue integrity [46]. Our study found that H2S treatment promotes the transformation of microglia to an anti‐inflammatory reparative phenotype and increases the secretion of anti‐inflammatory mediators, which may help curb excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and pericytes, thereby reducing scar formation and mitigating secondary neuroinflammation. Future studies should further clarify whether microglia mediate the inhibitory effects of H2S on scar formation.
Additionally, SCI is accompanied by disruption of the blood–spinal cord barrier and damage to the local vascular network, leading to ischemia and inflammatory responses [54]. Our data indicate that H2S treatment significantly increases the density of CD31+ microvessels at the injury site, thereby aiding in the reconstruction of the spinal cord vasculature and improving the local microenvironment to support the survival of residual neurons and axons. Although some studies suggest that microglia and macrophages regulate endogenous angiogenesis via signaling pathways such as SPP1 and IGF [55], further exploration is needed to determine whether the mechanisms by which H2S promotes angiogenesis align with those of microglia‐mediated endogenous angiogenesis.
The secondary inflammatory response following SCI is a critical factor that exacerbates neuronal damage and functional deficits. As the primary immune cells in the (CNS), microglia play a pivotal role in regulating neuroinflammation, with their polarization state closely linked to energy metabolism. Resting microglia primarily rely on oxidative phosphorylation, whereas activation shifts the pro‐inflammatory phenotype toward glycolysis, with the anti‐inflammatory phenotype remaining dependent on oxidative phosphorylation. AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK), a key regulator of cellular energy balance, is essential for maintaining oxidative phosphorylation. Studies have shown that inhibition of AMPK expression in microglia enhances the mTOR‐HIF‐1α signaling pathway, promoting glycolysis and increasing the secretion of inflammatory mediators [56]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that the H2S donor ADT can activate the AMPK signaling pathway, improve autophagic flux, and alleviate cellular damage, thereby promoting the polarization of microglia toward an anti‐inflammatory M2 phenotype and reducing pro‐inflammatory cytokine levels [57, 58]. Recent findings further suggest that H2S modulates mitochondrial function, reactive oxygen species production [38], and signaling pathways such as PI3K‐Akt, NF‐κB, and Nrf2 to ameliorate the local inflammatory microenvironment [59, 60]. These findings provide clear directions for further exploration of the specific mechanisms by which H2S regulates microglial polarization and the inflammatory microenvironment.
In recent years, advances in single‐cell sequencing technologies have revealed the remarkable heterogeneity of microglia. Studies show that, beyond the conventional M1/M2 paradigm, microglia in the injury microenvironment can be further subdivided into multiple functionally distinct subpopulations [61, 62]. Although our findings indicate that H2S treatment promotes the conversion of microglia to an anti‐inflammatory, reparative phenotype, it remains unclear whether this effect involves selective regulation of specific subpopulations. Future studies employing single‐cell RNA sequencing, lineage tracing, and multiplex immunostaining are warranted to elucidate the impact of H2S on the phenotypic and functional modulation of microglia during SCI repair and to delineate its regulatory effects on particular subpopulations. Such investigations will further clarify the mechanisms by which H2S modulates microglial polarization and remodels the injury microenvironment.
Despite the encouraging outcomes of this study, several limitations remain. The precise molecular mechanisms underlying H2S‐mediated SCI repair remain unclear and represent a primary focus for future research. Although our data indicate that intraperitoneal injection of ADT does not induce obvious systemic side effects, differences between this administration route and conventional clinical practices warrant further systematic evaluation of its long‐term effects and potential toxicity, as well as exploration of its applicability to other (CNS) injuries. Moreover, further studies involving a more detailed dose–response analysis are warranted to determine the optimal clinical dosage for maximal therapeutic efficacy. Given the complexity of in vivo metabolism, the bioavailability of H2S may be limited, potentially affecting its therapeutic efficacy. Consequently, the release rate and systemic distribution of H2S following intraperitoneal ADT administration should be assessed using more precise measurement techniques. Future research may also consider developing more efficient drug delivery systems that combine advanced delivery technologies, stem cell therapy, or neurotrophic factors to achieve multi‐target synergistic repair and further enhance therapeutic outcomes.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that H2S plays a positive role in inhibiting abnormal cell proliferation, promoting angiogenesis, and preserving neurons and axons, while also elucidating its potential mechanism in facilitating functional recovery through modulation of microglial polarization and remodeling of the injury microenvironment.
Author Contributions
Yu Wang: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, visualization, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Xinyi Jia: investigation, visualization. Yuqi Zhang: investigation. Haibin Shi: investigation. Yuhui Sun: methodology, writing – review and editing. Yaobo Liu: conceptualization, supervision, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration, resources.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Appendix S1.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2306502, 2023YFC2412502 to Y.L.), the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (82171376, 81971164, 81771330 to Y.L.), the Key Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2023701, BE2018654 to Y.L.), and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2306502, 2023YFC2412502 to Y.L.), the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (82171376, 81971164, 81771330 to Y.L.), the Key Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2023701, BE2018654 to Y.L.), and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Ahuja C. S., Wilson J. R., Nori S., et al., “Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers 3 (2017): 17018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Alizadeh A., Dyck S. M., and Karimi‐Abdolrezaee S., “Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Overview of Pathophysiology, Models and Acute Injury Mechanisms,” Frontiers in Neurology 10 (2019): 282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tran A. P., Warren P. M., and Silver J., “The Biology of Regeneration Failure and Success After Spinal Cord Injury,” Physiological Reviews 98, no. 2 (2018): 881–917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Anjum A., Yazid M. D., Fauzi Daud M., et al., “Spinal Cord Injury: Pathophysiology, Multimolecular Interactions, and Underlying Recovery Mechanisms,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 20 (2020): 7533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fan B., Wei Z., and Feng S., “Progression in Translational Research on Spinal Cord Injury Based on Microenvironment Imbalance,” Bone Research 10, no. 1 (2022): 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fan B., Wei Z., Yao X., et al., “Microenvironment Imbalance of Spinal Cord Injury,” Cell Transplantation 27, no. 6 (2018): 853–866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Liu Y., Zhao C., Zhang R., Pang Y., Li L., and Feng S., “Progression of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Regulation on Imbalanced Microenvironment After Spinal Cord Injury,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy 15, no. 1 (2024): 343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bloom O., Herman P. E., and Spungen A. M., “Systemic Inflammation in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury,” Experimental Neurology 325 (2020): 113143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Donnelly D. J. and Popovich P. G., “Inflammation and Its Role in Neuroprotection, Axonal Regeneration and Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury,” Experimental Neurology 209, no. 2 (2008): 378–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. O'Shea T. M., Burda J. E., and Sofroniew M. V., “Cell Biology of Spinal Cord Injury and Repair,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 127, no. 9 (2017): 3259–3270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bradbury E. J. and Burnside E. R., “Moving Beyond the Glial Scar for Spinal Cord Repair,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 3879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Orr M. B. and Gensel J. C., “Spinal Cord Injury Scarring and Inflammation: Therapies Targeting Glial and Inflammatory Responses,” Neurotherapeutics 15, no. 3 (2018): 541–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang Y., Yang S., Liu C., Han X., Gu X., and Zhou S., “Deciphering Glial Scar After Spinal Cord Injury,” Burns Trauma 9 (2021): tkab035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Squair J. W., Gautier M., Sofroniew M. V., Courtine G., and Anderson M. A., “Engineering Spinal Cord Repair,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 72 (2021): 48–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Gao X., Jin B., Zhou X., et al., “Recent Advances in the Application of Gasotransmitters in Spinal Cord Injury,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 22, no. 1 (2024): 277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wang Y., Yang T., and He Q., “Strategies for Engineering Advanced Nanomedicines for Gas Therapy of Cancer,” National Science Review 7, no. 9 (2020): 1485–1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Che X., Fang Y., Si X., et al., “The Role of Gaseous Molecules in Traumatic Brain Injury: An Updated Review,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 12 (2018): 392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wang L., Dan Q., Xu B., Chen Y., and Zheng T., “Research Progress on Gas Signal Molecular Therapy for Parkinson's Disease,” Open Life Sciences 18, no. 1 (2023): 20220658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zafonte R. D., Wang L., Arbelaez C. A., Dennison R., and Teng Y. D., “Medical Gas Therapy for Tissue, Organ, and CNS Protection: A Systematic Review of Effects, Mechanisms, and Challenges,” Advanced Science (Weinh) 9, no. 13 (2022): e2104136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rodkin S., Nwosu C., Sannikov A., et al., “The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in Regulation of Cell Death Following Neurotrauma and Related Neurodegenerative and Psychiatric Diseases,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13 (2023): 10742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sharif A. H., Iqbal M., Manhoosh B., et al., “Hydrogen Sulphide‐Based Therapeutics for Neurological Conditions: Perspectives and Challenges,” Neurochemical Research 48, no. 7 (2023): 1981–1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ding J. S., Zhang Y., Wang T. Y., et al., “Therapeutic Applications of Hydrogen Sulfide and Novel Donors for Cerebral Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review,” Medical Gas Research 13, no. 1 (2023): 7–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhong H., Yu H., Chen J., et al., “Hydrogen Sulfide and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Central Nervous System Degeneration Diseases,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 11 (2020): 702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhang J., Zhang S., Shan H., and Zhang M., “Biologic Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide and Its Role in Traumatic Brain Injury,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2020 (2020): 7301615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xu K., Wu F., Xu K., et al., “NaHS Restores Mitochondrial Function and Inhibits Autophagy by Activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signalling Pathway to Improve Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury,” Chemico‐Biological Interactions 286 (2018): 96–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhang J., Shan H., Tao L., and Zhang M., “Biological Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide and Its Protective Role in Intracerebral Hemorrhage,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 70, no. 12 (2020): 2020–2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wen X., Ye Y., Yu Z., Shen H., Cui G., and Chen G., “The Role of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide in Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Review,” Medical Gas Research 14, no. 3 (2024): 96–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang H., Wu Y., Han W., et al., “Hydrogen Sulfide Ameliorates Blood‐Spinal Cord Barrier Disruption and Improves Functional Recovery by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress‐Dependent Autophagy,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 9 (2018): 858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Xie L., Wu H., He Q., et al., “A Slow‐Releasing Donor of Hydrogen Sulfide Inhibits Neuronal Cell Death via Anti‐PANoptosis in Rats With Spinal Cord Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury,” Cell Communication and Signaling 22, no. 1 (2024): 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jia J., Xiao Y., Wang W., et al., “Differential Mechanisms Underlying Neuroprotection of Hydrogen Sulfide Donors Against Oxidative Stress,” Neurochemistry International 62, no. 8 (2013): 1072–1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wallace J. L., Vaughan D., Dicay M., MacNaughton W. K., and de Nucci G., “Hydrogen Sulfide‐Releasing Therapeutics: Translation to the Clinic,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 28, no. 16 (2018): 1533–1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang Y., Jia J., Ao G., et al., “Hydrogen Sulfide Protects Blood‐Brain Barrier Integrity Following Cerebral Ischemia,” Journal of Neurochemistry 129, no. 5 (2014): 827–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhang Y., Fang J., Ye S., et al., “A Hydrogen Sulphide‐Responsive and Depleting Nanoplatform for Cancer Photodynamic Therapy,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Basso D. M., Fisher L. C., Anderson A. J., Jakeman L. B., McTigue D. M., and Popovich P. G., “Basso Mouse Scale for Locomotion Detects Differences in Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury in Five Common Mouse Strains,” Journal of Neurotrauma 23, no. 5 (2006): 635–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. van den Brand R., Heutschi J., Barraud Q., et al., “Restoring Voluntary Control of Locomotion After Paralyzing Spinal Cord Injury,” Science 336, no. 6085 (2012): 1182–1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Matsumoto K., Mitani T. T., Horiguchi S. A., et al., “Advanced CUBIC Tissue Clearing for Whole‐Organ Cell Profiling,” Nature Protocols 14, no. 12 (2019): 3506–3537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Murakami T. C., Mano T., Saikawa S., et al., “A Three‐Dimensional Single‐Cell‐Resolution Whole‐Brain Atlas Using CUBIC‐X Expansion Microscopy and Tissue Clearing,” Nature Neuroscience 21, no. 4 (2018): 625–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yan X. L., Xu F. Y., Ji J. J., et al., “Activation of UCP2 by Anethole Trithione Suppresses Neuroinflammation After Intracerebral Hemorrhage,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 43, no. 4 (2022): 811–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ng M. T., Stammers A. T., and Kwon B. K., “Vascular Disruption and the Role of Angiogenic Proteins After Spinal Cord Injury,” Translational Stroke Research 2, no. 4 (2011): 474–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chen J. J. Y., van der Vlies A. J., and Hasegawa U., “Hydrogen Sulfide‐Releasing Micelles for Promoting Angiogenesis,” Polymer Chemistry 11 (2020): 4454–4463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Szabo C. and Papapetropoulos A., “Hydrogen Sulphide and Angiogenesis: Mechanisms and Applications,” British Journal of Pharmacology 164, no. 3 (2011): 853–865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wang J. F., Li Y., Song J. N., and Pang H. G., “Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in Secondary Neuronal Injury,” Neurochemistry International 64 (2014): 37–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li Z., Wang Y., Xie Y., Yang Z., and Zhang T., “Protective Effects of Exogenous Hydrogen Sulfide on Neurons of Hippocampus in a Rat Model of Brain Ischemia,” Neurochemical Research 36, no. 10 (2011): 1840–1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kong G., Xiong W., Li C., et al., “Treg Cells‐Derived Exosomes Promote Blood‐Spinal Cord Barrier Repair and Motor Function Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury by Delivering miR‐2861,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 21, no. 1 (2023): 364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gaudet A. D. and Fonken L. K., “Glial Cells Shape Pathology and Repair After Spinal Cord Injury,” Neurotherapeutics 15, no. 3 (2018): 554–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bellver‐Landete V., Bretheau F., Mailhot B., et al., “Microglia Are an Essential Component of the Neuroprotective Scar That Forms After Spinal Cord Injury,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kobashi S., Terashima T., Katagi M., et al., “Transplantation of M2‐Deviated Microglia Promotes Recovery of Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury in Mice,” Molecular Therapy 28, no. 1 (2020): 254–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Campolo M., Esposito E., Ahmad A., Di Paola R., Wallace J. L., and Cuzzocrea S., “A Hydrogen Sulfide‐Releasing Cyclooxygenase Inhibitor Markedly Accelerates Recovery From Experimental Spinal Cord Injury,” FASEB Journal 27, no. 11 (2013): 4489–4499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wang R., Wu X., Tian Z., et al., “Sustained Release of Hydrogen Sulfide From Anisotropic Ferrofluid Hydrogel for the Repair of Spinal Cord Injury,” Bioactive Materials 23 (2023): 118–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Albashari A. A., He Y., Luo Y., et al., “Local Spinal Cord Injury Treatment Using a Dental Pulp Stem Cell Encapsulated H(2)S Releasing Multifunctional Injectable Hydrogel,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 13, no. 9 (2024): e2302286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hellal F., Hurtado A., Ruschel J., et al., “Microtubule Stabilization Reduces Scarring and Causes Axon Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury,” Science 331, no. 6019 (2011): 928–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ruschel J., Hellal F., Flynn K. C., et al., “Axonal Regeneration. Systemic Administration of Epothilone B Promotes Axon Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury,” Science 348, no. 6232 (2015): 347–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dias D. O., Kim H., Holl D., et al., “Reducing Pericyte‐Derived Scarring Promotes Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury,” Cell 173, no. 1 (2018): 153–165.e122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Figley S. A., Khosravi R., Legasto J. M., Tseng Y. F., and Fehlings M. G., “Characterization of Vascular Disruption and Blood‐Spinal Cord Barrier Permeability Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma 31, no. 6 (2014): 541–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Yao C., Cao Y., Wang D., et al., “Single‐Cell Sequencing Reveals Microglia Induced Angiogenesis by Specific Subsets of Endothelial Cells Following Spinal Cord Injury,” FASEB Journal 36, no. 7 (2022): e22393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zhang L., Yang H., Zhang W., et al., “Clk1‐Regulated Aerobic Glycolysis Is Involved in Glioma Chemoresistance,” Journal of Neurochemistry 142, no. 4 (2017): 574–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Xie H., Xu Q., Jia J., et al., “Hydrogen Sulfide Protects Against Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury by Activating AMP‐Activated Protein Kinase to Restore Autophagic Flux,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 458, no. 3 (2015): 632–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zhang M., Wu X., Xu Y., et al., “The Cystathionine Beta‐Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Pathway Contributes to Microglia‐Mediated Neuroinflammation Following Cerebral Ischemia,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 66 (2017): 332–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Gong L., Chang L., Chen S., et al., “Multifunctional Injectable Hydrogel With Self‐Supplied H(2)S Release and Bacterial Inhibition for the Wound Healing With Enhanced Macrophages Polarization via Interfering With PI3K/Akt Pathway,” Biomaterials 318 (2025): 123144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Lin K., Zhang Y., Shen Y., Xu Y., Huang M., and Liu X., “Hydrogen Sulfide Can Scavenge Free Radicals to Improve Spinal Cord Injury by Inhibiting the p38MAPK/mTOR/NF‐kappaB Signaling Pathway,” Neuromolecular Medicine 26, no. 1 (2024): 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Brennan F. H., Li Y., Wang C., et al., “Microglia Coordinate Cellular Interactions During Spinal Cord Repair in Mice,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Li C., Wu Z., Zhou L., et al., “Temporal and Spatial Cellular and Molecular Pathological Alterations With Single‐Cell Resolution in the Adult Spinal Cord After Injury,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7, no. 1 (2022): 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix S1.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
