Abstract
A local barrier to gene flow will delay the spread of an advantageous allele. Exact calculations for the deterministic case show that an allele that is favorable when rare is delayed very little even by a strong barrier: its spread is slowed by a time proportional to log ((B/σ) &2S)/S, where B is the barrier strength, σ the dispersal range, and fitnesses are 1:1 + S:1 + 2S. However, when there is selection against heterozygotes, such that the allele cannot increase from low frequency, a barrier can cause a much greater delay. If gene flow is reduced below a critical value, spread is entirely prevented. Stochastic simulations show that with additive selection, random drift slows down the spread of the allele, below the deterministic speed of σ &2S. The delay to the advance of an advantageous allele caused by a strong barrier can be substantially increased by random drift and increases with B/(2Sρσ(2)) in a one-dimensional habitat of density ρ. However, with selection against heterozygotes, drift can facilitate the spread and can free an allele that would otherwise be trapped indefinitely by a strong barrier. We discuss the implications of these results for the evolution of chromosome rearrangements.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barton N. H., Rouhani S. The frequency of shifts between alternative equilibria. J Theor Biol. 1987 Apr 21;125(4):397–418. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80210-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barton N. H. The effects of linkage and density-dependent regulation on gene flow. Heredity (Edinb) 1986 Dec;57(Pt 3):415–426. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1986.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Capanna E., Corti M., Mainardi D., Parmigiani S., Brain P. F. Karyotype and intermale aggression in wild house mice: ecology and speciation. Behav Genet. 1984 May;14(3):195–208. doi: 10.1007/BF01065541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Capanna E., Gropp A., Winking H., Noack G., Civitelli M. V. Robertsonian metacentrics in the mouse. Chromosoma. 1976 Nov 29;58(4):341–353. doi: 10.1007/BF00292842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B. Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genet Res. 1980 Apr;35(2):205–214. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300014051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davisson M. T., Akeson E. C. Recombination suppression by heterozygous Robertsonian chromosomes in the mouse. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):649–667. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epperson B. K. Spatial and space-time correlations in systems of subpopulations with stochastic migration. Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Oct;46(2):160–197. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagylaki T. Clines with variable migration. Genetics. 1976 Aug;83(4):867–886. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.4.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slatkin M., Charlesworth D. The spatial distribution of transient alleles in a subdivided population: a simulation study. Genetics. 1978 Aug;89(4):793–810. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.4.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viroux M. C., Bauchau V. Segregation and fertility in Mus musculus domesticus (wild mice) heterozygous for the Rb(4.12) translocation. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Feb;68(Pt 2):131–134. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson A. C., Sarich V. M., Maxson L. R. The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):3028–3030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]