Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Mar;145(3):847–855. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.847

Estimating Ancestral Population Parameters

J Wakeley 1, J Hey 1
PMCID: PMC1207868  PMID: 9055093

Abstract

The expected numbers of different categories of polymorphic sites are derived for two related models of population history: the isolation model, in which an ancestral population splits into two descendents, and the size-change model, in which a single population undergoes an instantaneous change in size. For the isolation model, the observed numbers of shared, fixed, and exclusive polymorphic sites are used to estimate the relative sizes of the three populations, ancestral plus two descendent, as well as the time of the split. For the size-change model, the numbers of sites segregating at particular frequencies in the sample are used to estimate the relative sizes of the ancestral and descendent populations plus the time the change took place. Parameters are estimated by choosing values that most closely equate expectations with observations. Computer simulations show that current and historical population parameters can be estimated accurately. The methods are applied to DNA data from two species of Drosophila and to some human mitochondrial DNA sequences.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Di Rienzo A., Wilson A. C. Branching pattern in the evolutionary tree for human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 1;88(5):1597–1601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.5.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fu Y. X., Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fu Y. X. Statistical properties of segregating sites. Theor Popul Biol. 1995 Oct;48(2):172–197. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hey J., Kliman R. M. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):804–822. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hey J. The structure of genealogies and the distribution of fixed differences between DNA sequence samples from natural populations. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):831–840. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):147–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kliman R. M., Hey J. DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):375–387. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Slatkin M., Hudson R. R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):555–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):597–601. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Takahata N. An attempt to estimate the effective size of the ancestral species common to two extant species from which homologous genes are sequenced. Genet Res. 1986 Dec;48(3):187–190. doi: 10.1017/s001667230002499x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takahata N., Nei M. Gene genealogy and variance of interpopulational nucleotide differences. Genetics. 1985 Jun;110(2):325–344. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Takahata N., Satta Y., Klein J. Divergence time and population size in the lineage leading to modern humans. Theor Popul Biol. 1995 Oct;48(2):198–221. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES