Abstract
This paper derives the long-term effective size, N(e), for a general model of population subdivision, allowing for differential deme fitness, variable emigration and immigration rates, extinction, colonization, and correlations across generations in these processes. We show that various long-term measures of N(e) are equivalent. The effective size of a metapopulation can be expressed in a variety of ways. At a demographic equilibrium, N(e) can be derived from the demography by combining information about the ultimate contribution of each deme to the future genetic make-up of the population and Wright's F(ST)'s. The effective size is given by N(e) = 1/(1 + var ( &))<(1 - f(STi))/N(i)n>, where n is the number of demes, &(i) is the eventual contribution of individuals in deme i to the whole population (scaled such that σ(i) &(i) = n), and < > denotes an average weighted by &(i)(2). This formula is applied to a catastrophic extinction model (where sites are either empty or at carrying capacity) and to a metapopulation model with explicit dynamics, where extinction is caused by demographic stochasticity and by chaos. Contrary to the expectation from the standard island model, the usual effect of population subdivision is to decrease the effective size relative to a panmictic population living on the same resource.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 Dec;73(Pt 6):657–679. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth B. The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213–227. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chesser R. K., Rhodes O. E., Jr, Sugg D. W., Schnabel A. Effective sizes for subdivided populations. Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1221–1232. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregorius H. R. On the concept of effective number. Theor Popul Biol. 1991 Oct;40(2):269–283. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(91)90056-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G. A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):317–322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondrashov A. S. Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? J Theor Biol. 1995 Aug 21;175(4):583–594. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science. 1988 Sep 16;241(4872):1455–1460. doi: 10.1126/science.3420403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santiago E., Caballero A. Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1013–1030. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slatkin M. Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Dec;12(3):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slatkin M. Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times. Genet Res. 1991 Oct;58(2):167–175. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300029827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]