Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Nov;147(3):1303–1316. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1303

Patterns of DNA Variability at X-Linked Loci in Mus Domesticus

M W Nachman 1
PMCID: PMC1208253  PMID: 9383072

Abstract

Introns of four X-linked genes (Hprt, Plp, Glra2, and Amg) were sequenced to provide an estimate of nucleotide diversity at nuclear genes within the house mouse and to test the neutral prediction that the ratio of intraspecific polymorphism to interspecific divergence is the same for different loci. Hprt and Plp lie in a region of the X chromosome that experiences relatively low recombination rates, while Glra2 and Amg lie near the telomere of the X chromosome, a region that experiences higher recombination rates. A total of 6022 bases were sequenced in each of 10 Mus domesticus and one M. caroli. Average nucleotide diversity (π) for introns within M. domesticus was quite low (π = 0.078%). However, there was substantial variation in the level of heterozygosity among loci. The two telomeric loci, Glra2 and Amg, had higher ratios of polymorphism to divergence than the two loci experiencing lower recombination rates. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that heterozygosity is reduced in regions with lower rates of recombination, although sampling of additional genes is needed to establish whether there is a general correlation between heterozygosity and recombination rate as in Drosophila melanogaster.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aquadro C. F., Lado K. M., Noon W. A. The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):875–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquadro C. F. Why is the genome variable? Insights from Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1992 Oct;8(10):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1019–1032. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berry A., Kreitman M. Molecular analysis of an allozyme cline: alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster on the east coast of North America. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):869–893. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brookfield J. F., Sharp P. M. Neutralism and selectionism face up to DNA data. Trends Genet. 1994 Apr;10(4):109–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cann R. L., Stoneking M., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature. 1987 Jan 1;325(6099):31–36. doi: 10.1038/325031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Charlesworth B. The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213–227. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1619–1632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Choudhary M., Coulthart M. B., Singh R. S. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Patterns and processes of genic divergence between D. melanogaster and its sibling species, Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):843–853. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DiMichele L., Powers D. A. LDH-B genotype-specific hatching times of Fundulus heteroclitus embryos. Nature. 1982 Apr 8;296(5857):563–564. doi: 10.1038/296563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DiMichele L., Powers D. A. Physiological basis for swimming endurance differences between LDH-B genotypes of Fundulus heteroclitus. Science. 1982 May 28;216(4549):1014–1016. doi: 10.1126/science.7079747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dietrich W. F., Miller J. C., Steen R. G., Merchant M., Damron D., Nahf R., Gross A., Joyce D. C., Wessel M., Dredge R. D. A genetic map of the mouse with 4,006 simple sequence length polymorphisms. Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2 Spec No):220–245. doi: 10.1038/ng0694supp-220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dietrich W., Katz H., Lincoln S. E., Shin H. S., Friedman J., Dracopoli N. C., Lander E. S. A genetic map of the mouse suitable for typing intraspecific crosses. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):423–447. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaut B. S., Clegg M. T. Nucleotide polymorphism in the Adh1 locus of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (Poaceae). Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1091–1097. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gillespie J. H. Substitution processes in molecular evolution. III. Deleterious alleles. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):943–952. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guttman D. S., Dykhuizen D. E. Detecting selective sweeps in naturally occurring Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):993–1003. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Oct;13(8):1133–1140. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hammer M. F. A recent common ancestry for human Y chromosomes. Nature. 1995 Nov 23;378(6555):376–378. doi: 10.1038/378376a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hey J. Mitochondrial and nuclear genes present conflicting portraits of human origins. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Feb;14(2):166–172. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hudson R. R. How can the low levels of DNA sequence variation in regions of the drosophila genome with low recombination rates be explained? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6815–6818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ikenaka K., Furuichi T., Iwasaki Y., Moriguchi A., Okano H., Mikoshiba K. Myelin proteolipid protein gene structure and its regulation of expression in normal and jimpy mutant mice. J Mol Biol. 1988 Feb 20;199(4):587–596. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90303-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins T. M., Basten C. J., Anderson W. W. Mitochondrial gene divergence of Colombian Drosophila pseudoobscura. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Nov;13(9):1266–1275. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kirby D. A., Stephan W. Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):635–645. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lewontin R. C. The detection of linkage disequilibrium in molecular sequence data. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):377–388. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li W. H., Sadler L. A. Low nucleotide diversity in man. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):513–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Matzenbach B., Maulet Y., Sefton L., Courtier B., Avner P., Guénet J. L., Betz H. Structural analysis of mouse glycine receptor alpha subunit genes. Identification and chromosomal localization of a novel variant. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 28;269(4):2607–2612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Melton D. W., Konecki D. S., Brennand J., Caskey C. T. Structure, expression, and mutation of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):2147–2151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nachman M. W., Aquadro C. F. Polymorphism and divergence at the 5' flanking region of the sex-determining locus, Sry, in mice. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 May;11(3):539–547. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nachman M. W., Boyer S. N., Aquadro C. F. Nonneutral evolution at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 gene in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 5;91(14):6364–6368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nachman M. W., Brown W. M., Stoneking M., Aquadro C. F. Nonneutral mitochondrial DNA variation in humans and chimpanzees. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):953–963. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nachman M. W., Churchill G. A. Heterogeneity in rates of recombination across the mouse genome. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):537–548. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nei M., Li W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Polani P. E. Centromere localization at meiosis and the position of chiasmata in the male and female mouse. Chromosoma. 1972;36(4):343–374. doi: 10.1007/BF00336793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rand D. M., Kann L. M. Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jul;13(6):735–748. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rice N. R., Straus N. A. Relatedness of mouse satellite deoxyribonucleic acid to deoxyribonucleic acid of various Mus species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3546–3550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Saiki R. K., Bugawan T. L., Horn G. T., Mullis K. B., Erlich H. A. Analysis of enzymatically amplified beta-globin and HLA-DQ alpha DNA with allele-specific oligonucleotide probes. Nature. 1986 Nov 13;324(6093):163–166. doi: 10.1038/324163a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saiki R. K., Gelfand D. H., Stoffel S., Scharf S. J., Higuchi R., Horn G. T., Mullis K. B., Erlich H. A. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schaeffer S. W., Miller E. L. Estimates of linkage disequilibrium and the recombination parameter determined from segregating nucleotide sites in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):541–552. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02603075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Singh R. S., Rhomberg L. R. A Comprehensive Study of Genic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Estimates of Heterozygosity and Patterns of Geographic Differentiation. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):255–271. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Slatkin M. Hitchhiking and associative overdominance at a microsatellite locus. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):473–480. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Snead M. L., Lau E. C., Zeichner-David M., Fincham A. G., Woo S. L., Slavkin H. C. DNA sequence for cloned cDNA for murine amelogenin reveal the amino acid sequence for enamel-specific protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985 Jun 28;129(3):812–818. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(85)91964-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stephan W. An improved method for estimating the rate of fixation of favorable mutations based on DNA polymorphism data. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):959–962. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Takahata N. Repeated failures that led to the eventual success in human evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):803–805. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tucker P. K., Lee B. K., Eicher E. M. Y chromosome evolution in the subgenus Mus (genus Mus). Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):169–179. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Watt W. B. Adaptation at Specific Loci. II. Demographic and Biochemical Elements in the Maintenance of the Colias Pgi Polymorphism. Genetics. 1983 Apr;103(4):691–724. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.4.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES