Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1975 Nov;81(3):537–552. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.3.537

Genetic Modification of Recombination Rate in TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM

Andrew A Dewees 1
PMCID: PMC1213419  PMID: 1205134

Abstract

Asymmetrical responses were obtained in a replicated study of 15 generations of two-way selection for recombination rate between the ruby (rb) and jet (j) loci in Tribolium castaneum. Recombination rates in the two replicate high lines increased from an average of 0.22 in the base populations to an average of 0.42 at generation 15. Recombination rate pooled over the 15 generations of selection in each low line was significantly less than the control but there was no clear downward trend in response to selection for decreased recombination rate. The realized heritabilities were 0.16 ± 0.03 and 0.17 ± 0.02 in the two high lines, and were not significantly different from zero in the two low lines. Selection was based on crossing over in cis females only; however, rates measured in cis males after 12 generations showed the same response patterns as female rates. Similar response patterns were also determined for recombination measured in trans males and females at generation 18 following three generations of relaxed selection. The distribution of recombination rates measured in backcross beetles [(H x L) x H and (H x L) x L] at generation 12 indicated polygenic control with those genes decreasing recombination rate being dominant. Detailed analysis of recombination rates in F1's produced by interline crosses at generation 15 confirmed the directional dominance findings. Under a polygenic model of recombination modifiers in which low recombination is dominant to high, average recombination rates will increase as inbreeding progresses, thus providing a mechanism for the production of new gene combinations in small populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (954.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdullah N. F., Charlesworth B. Selection for reduced crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Mar;76(3):447–451. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.3.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodmer W. F., Felsenstein J. Linkage and selection: theoretical analysis of the deterministic two locus random mating model. Genetics. 1967 Oct;57(2):237–265. doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feldman M. W. Selection for linkage modification. I. Random mating populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Sep;3(3):324–346. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90007-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GRANT V. The regulation of recombination in plants. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:337–363. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1958.023.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gowen J W. A Biometrical Study of Crossing Over. on the Mechanism of Crossing over in the Third Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1919 May;4(3):205–250. doi: 10.1093/genetics/4.3.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karlin S., Feldman M. W. Linkage and selection: two locus symmetric viability model. Theor Popul Biol. 1970 May;1(1):39–71. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(70)90041-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kidwell M. G. Genetic change of recobination value in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Simulated natural selection. Genetics. 1972 Mar;70(3):433–443. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.3.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES