Abstract
The accumulation of modifiers of the meiotic-drive locus Segregation Distorter (SD) in Drosophila melanogaster was monitored by measuring the changes in the mean and variance of drive strength (in terms of "make" value) that occur in laboratory populations when SD and SD+ chromosomes are in direct competition. The particular SD lines used are T(Y;2),SD translocations showing pseudo-Y drive. Four sets of population cages were analyzed. Two sets were monitored for changes in SD fitness and drive strength (presumed to be positively correlated) and analyzed for the presence of autosomal dominant or X-linked modifiers after long periods of time. The remaining two sets were made up of cages either made isogenic or variable for background genetic material, and these were used to test whether the rate of accumulation of modifiers was dependent on initial genetic variability.—Contrary to previous studies in which most suppression of SD action could apparently be attributed to a few dominantly acting modifiers of large effect, the conclusion here is that laboratory populations that are initially free of such major dominant loci evolve to suppress SD action by accumulating polygenic, recessive modifiers, each of small effect, and that much of the required genetic variability can be generated de novo by mutation. Possible explanations for these seemingly incompatible results and the evolutionary implications for SD are considered.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ganetzky B. On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):321–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartl D. L. A mathematical model for recessive lethal segregation distorters with differential viabilities in the sexes. Genetics. 1970 Sep;66(1):147–163. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlin S., McGregor J. Towards a theory of the evolution of modifier genes. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Feb;5(1):59–103. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyttle T. W. Experimental population genetics of meiotic drive systems. I. Pseudo-Y chromosomal drive as a means of eliminating cage populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):413–445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomson G. J., Feldman M. W. Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive: IV. On the evolution of sex-ratio distortion. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Oct;8(2):202–211. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tokuyasu K. T., Peacock W. J., Hardy R. W. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Effects of segregation distorter (SD) chromosome. J Ultrastruct Res. 1977 Jan;58(1):96–107. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(77)80011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]