Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1988 Mar;59(3):299–303. doi: 10.1136/hrt.59.3.299

Feasibility and variability of six methods for the echocardiographic and Doppler determination of cardiac output.

G L Nicolosi 1, E Pungercic 1, E Cervesato 1, D Pavan 1, L Modena 1, E Moro 1, V Dall'Aglio 1, D Zanuttini 1
PMCID: PMC1216463  PMID: 3355721

Abstract

The feasibility and the intrinsic variability of six different methods of echocardiographic and Doppler flow determination of cardiac output were analysed in 34 healthy volunteers. Four were excluded because of poor quality echocardiograms. The mean (range) age of the remaining 30 (12 women, 18 men) was 21 years (13-36 years). Cardiac output was calculated by six methods as a product of echocardiographically determined cross sectional area of the aorta (apical and suprasternal views), pulmonary trunk, tricuspid annulus, and mitral annulus (circular and corrected for diastolic variations), and the flow velocity integral measured by Doppler. Cardiac output ranged from 2.79 to 6.56 1/min (4.45 (1.29) 1/min) (mean (SD)). The feasibility of the methods ranged from 87% (26 patients) for the aorta from the suprasternal notch to 100% (30 patients) for the mitral orifice corrected for diastolic variations and for the tricuspid valve. The corresponding results for all 34 individuals were 76% and 88% respectively. Three way analysis of variance was performed in the 23 healthy volunteers in whom all six methods were feasible. Interobserver and intraobserver interpretative variabilities were 6.8% and 5.9% respectively. The intrinsic variability of each single measurement of cardiac output, independently of the observer and the method used, was 25%. Provided the image was suitable for analysis echocardiographic and Doppler flow determination of cardiac output was feasible in most healthy volunteers. But there was significant intrinsic variability for each of different methods. A single value of cardiac output in an individual should be interpreted with caution.

Full text

PDF
303

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Distante A., Moscarelli E., Rovai D., L'Abbate A. Monitoring of changes in cardiac output by transcutaneous aortovelography, a non-invasive Doppler technique: comparison with thermodilution. J Nucl Med Allied Sci. 1980 Jul-Dec;24(3-4):171–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Felner J. M., Blumenstein B. A., Schlant R. C., Carter A. D., Alimurung B. N., Johnson M. J., Sherman S. W., Klicpera M. W., Kutner M. H., Drucker L. W. Sources of variability in echocardiographic measurements. Am J Cardiol. 1980 May;45(5):995–1004. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher D. C., Sahn D. J., Friedman M. J., Larson D., Valdes-Cruz L. M., Horowitz S., Goldberg S. J., Allen H. D. The effect of variations of pulsed Doppler sampling site on calculation of cardiac output: an experimental study in open-chest dogs. Circulation. 1983 Feb;67(2):370–376. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.2.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher D. C., Sahn D. J., Friedman M. J., Larson D., Valdes-Cruz L. M., Horowitz S., Goldberg S. J., Allen H. D. The mitral valve orifice method for noninvasive two-dimensional echo Doppler determinations of cardiac output. Circulation. 1983 Apr;67(4):872–877. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.4.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardin J. M., Dabestani A., Matin K., Allfie A., Russell D., Henry W. L. Reproducibility of Doppler aortic blood flow measurements: studies on intraobserver, interobserver and day-to-day variability in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Nov 1;54(8):1092–1098. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gardin J. M., Tobis J. M., Dabestani A., Smith C., Elkayam U., Castleman E., White D., Allfie A., Henry W. L. Superiority of two-dimensional measurement of aortic vessel diameter in Doppler echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular stroke volume. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Jul;6(1):66–74. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huntsman L. L., Stewart D. K., Barnes S. R., Franklin S. B., Colocousis J. S., Hessel E. A. Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation. 1983 Mar;67(3):593–602. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.3.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ihlen H., Amlie J. P., Dale J., Forfang K., Nitter-Hauge S., Otterstad J. E., Simonsen S., Myhre E. Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1984 Jan;51(1):54–60. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kitabatake A., Inoue M., Asao M., Ito H., Masuyama T., Tanouchi J., Morita T., Hori M., Yoshima H., Ohnishi K. Noninvasive evaluation of the ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow in atrial septal defect by duplex Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1984 Jan;69(1):73–79. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.69.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewis J. F., Kuo L. C., Nelson J. G., Limacher M. C., Quinones M. A. Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation. 1984 Sep;70(3):425–431. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.3.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Loeber C. P., Goldberg S. J., Allen H. D. Doppler echocardiographic comparison of flows distal to the four cardiac valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Aug;4(2):268–272. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loeppky J. A., Hoekenga D. E., Greene E. R., Luft U. C. Comparison of noninvasive pulsed Doppler and Fick measurements of stroke volume in cardiac patients. Am Heart J. 1984 Feb;107(2):339–346. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90384-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McLennan F. M., Haites N. E., Mackenzie J. D., Daniel M. K., Rawles J. M. Reproducibility of linear cardiac output measurement by Doppler ultrasound alone. Br Heart J. 1986 Jan;55(1):25–31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.55.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meijboom E. J., Valdes-Cruz L. M., Horowitz S., Sahn D. J., Larson D. F., Young K. A., Oliveira Lima C., Goldberg S. J., Allen H. D. A two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic method for calculation of pulmonary and systemic blood flow in a canine model with a variable-sized left-to-right extracardiac shunt. Circulation. 1983 Aug;68(2):437–445. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.2.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nicolosi G. L., Pungercic E., Cervesato E., Modena L., Zanuttini D. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variation of interpretation of the echocardiographic and Doppler flow determination of cardiac output by the mitral orifice method. Br Heart J. 1986 May;55(5):446–448. doi: 10.1136/hrt.55.5.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishimura R. A., Callahan M. J., Schaff H. V., Ilstrup D. M., Miller F. A., Tajik A. J. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography: initial experience and review of the literature. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Jul;59(7):484–489. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60438-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rein A. J., Hsieh K. S., Elixson M., Colan S. D., Lang P., Sanders S. P., Castaneda A. R. Cardiac output estimates in the pediatric intensive care unit using a continuous-wave Doppler computer: validation and limitations of the technique. Am Heart J. 1986 Jul;112(1):97–103. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90685-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rose J. S., Nanna M., Rahimtoola S. H., Elkayam U., McKay C., Chandraratna P. A. Accuracy of determination of changes in cardiac output by transcutaneous continuous-wave Doppler computer. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Nov 1;54(8):1099–1101. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sahn D. J. Determination of cardiac output by echocardiographic Doppler methods: relative accuracy of various sites for measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Sep;6(3):663–664. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80128-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuster A. H., Nanda N. C. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: comparison with a non-golden standard. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):257–259. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90723-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stewart W. J., Jiang L., Mich R., Pandian N., Guerrero J. L., Weyman A. E. Variable effects of changes in flow rate through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area and flow velocity: impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Sep;6(3):653–662. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80127-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Valdes-Cruz L. M., Horowitz S., Mesel E., Sahn D. J., Fisher D. C., Larson D. A pulsed Doppler echocardiographic method for calculating pulmonary and systemic blood flow in atrial level shunts: validation studies in animals and initial human experience. Circulation. 1984 Jan;69(1):80–86. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.69.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vargas Barron J., Sahn D. J., Valdes-Cruz L. M., Lima C. O., Goldberg S. J., Grenadier E., Allen H. D. Clinical utility of two-dimensional doppler echocardiographic techniques for estimating pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratios in children with left to right shunting atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect or patent ductus arteriosus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Jan;3(1):169–178. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80445-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES