Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1988 Sep;60(3):181–187. doi: 10.1136/hrt.60.3.181

High gain signal averaged electrocardiogram combined with 24 hour monitoring in patients early after myocardial infarction for bedside prediction of arrhythmic events.

T Cripps 1, E D Bennett 1, A J Camm 1, D E Ward 1
PMCID: PMC1216551  PMID: 3179133

Abstract

The value of the high gain, signal averaged electrocardiogram combined with 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring in the prediction of arrhythmic events was assessed in 159 patients in the first week after myocardial infarction. Eleven patients (7%) suffered arrhythmic events during a mean (SD) of 12 (6) months of follow up (range 2-22, median 13 months). The combination of high gain, signal averaged electrocardiography and 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring was more accurate than either technique alone or than clinical information collected during admission in predicting these events. The combination identified a high risk group of 13 (8%) patients, with an arrhythmic event rate of 62% and a low risk group with an event rate of 2%. The combination of high gain, signal averaged electrocardiography and 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring in the first week after myocardial infarction provides a rapid, cheap, and non-invasive bedside method for the prediction of arrhythmias.

Full text

PDF
182

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bigger J. T., Jr, Fleiss J. L., Kleiger R., Miller J. P., Rolnitzky L. M. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1984 Feb;69(2):250–258. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.69.2.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigger J. T., Jr, Wenger T. L., Heissenbuttel R. H. Limitations of the Lown grading system for study of human ventricular arrhythmias. Am Heart J. 1977 Jun;93(6):727–729. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(77)80068-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breithardt G., Schwarzmaier J., Borggrefe M., Haerten K., Seipel L. Prognostic significance of late ventricular potentials after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1983 Jul;4(7):487–495. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cobbe S. M., Hoffman E., Ritzenhoff A., Brachmann J., Kübler W., Senges J. Day to day variations in morphology and duration of fragmented ventricular potentials during the late post-myocardial infarction phase in conscious dogs. Eur Heart J. 1985 Aug;6(8):672–680. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis H. T., DeCamilla J., Bayer L. W., Moss A. J. Survivorship patterns in the posthospital phase of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1979 Dec;60(6):1252–1258. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.6.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Denniss A. R., Richards D. A., Cody D. V., Russell P. A., Young A. A., Cooper M. J., Ross D. L., Uther J. B. Prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation induced at programmed stimulation and delayed potentials detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiograms of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1986 Oct;74(4):731–745. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.4.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Denniss A. R., Ross D. L., Richards D. A., Uther J. B. Changes in ventricular activation time on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in the first year after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Sep 1;60(7):580–583. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90309-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. El-Sherif N., Hope R. R., Scherlag B. J., Lazzara R. Re-entrant ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period. 2. Patterns of initiation and termination of re-entry. Circulation. 1977 May;55(5):702–719. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.55.5.702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomes J. A., Winters S. L., Stewart D., Horowitz S., Milner M., Barreca P. A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug;10(2):349–357. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gomes J. A., Winters S. L., Stewart D., Targonski A., Barreca P. Optimal bandpass filters for time-domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Dec 1;60(16):1290–1298. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90610-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kanovsky M. S., Falcone R. A., Dresden C. A., Josephson M. E., Simson M. B. Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):264–270. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Killip T., 3rd, Kimball J. T. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Oct;20(4):457–464. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuchar D. L., Thorburn C. W., Sammel N. L. Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Mar;9(3):531–538. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lown B. Sudden cardiac death: the major challenge confronting contemporary cardiology. Am J Cardiol. 1979 Feb;43(2):313–328. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(79)80021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mukharji J., Rude R. E., Poole W. K., Gustafson N., Thomas L. J., Jr, Strauss H. W., Jaffe A. S., Muller J. E., Roberts R., Raabe D. S., Jr Risk factors for sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: two-year follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jul 1;54(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90299-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Norris R. M., Brandt P. W., Caughey D. E., Lee A. J., Scott P. J. A new coronary prognostic index. Lancet. 1969 Feb 8;1(7589):274–278. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Simson M. B., Untereker W. J., Spielman S. R., Horowitz L. N., Marcus N. H., Falcone R. A., Harken A. H., Josephson M. E. Relation between late potentials on the body surface and directly recorded fragmented electrograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jan 1;51(1):105–112. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simson M. B. Use of signals in the terminal QRS complex to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):235–242. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.2.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES