Skip to main content
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews : MMBR logoLink to Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews : MMBR
. 2025 Mar 14;89(2):e00261-24. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00261-24

Mycobiome: an underexplored kingdom in cancer

Yan-Yan Sun 1, Ning-Ning Liu 1,
Editor: Joseph Heitman2
PMCID: PMC12188744  PMID: 40084887

SUMMARY

The human microbiome, including bacteria, fungi, archaea, and viruses, is intimately linked to both health and disease. The relationship between bacteria and disease has received much attention and intensive investigation, while that of the fungal microbiome, also known as mycobiome, has lagged far behind bacteria. There is growing evidence showing mycobiome dysbiosis in cancer patients, and certain cancer-specific fungi may contribute to cancer progression by interacting with both host and bacteria. It was also demonstrated that the role of fungi-derived products in cancer should also not be underestimated. Therefore, investigating how fungal pathogenesis contributes to the onset and spread of cancer would yield crucial information for cancer diagnosis, prevention, and anti-cancer therapy.

KEYWORDS: mycobiome, fungi, cancer, diagnosis, anticancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Globally, cancer is a significant socioeconomic issue, accounting for approximately one-sixth of global deaths and one-quarter of non-infectious deaths (1). An estimated one in five people will have cancer at some point in their lives, while about 1 in 9 males and 1 in 12 females will die from it (1). It is projected that there will be 35 million new cancer cases diagnosed in 2050, according to the demographic estimate. According to clinical statistics, about 13% of the approximately 2.2 million cancer cases that occurred in 2018 were linked to infections (2). Nevertheless, regarding the pathogenic mechanism of cancer, little is known.

The microbiome, which includes bacteria, fungi, viruses, and archaea, is intimately linked to human health (3, 4). Unlike the bacterial microbiome, the role of fungi in diverse diseases has long been neglected. The reasons may include several aspects. First off, it is important to note that there are 1011 bacterial cells/g of feces, which is significantly higher compared to only 105–106 fungal cells. This remarkable contrast suggests that the bacterial population in feces vastly outnumbers the fungal population (5, 6). In other words, fungal genes are approximately less than 1% of the gut microbiome (7). In the TCGA primary tumors, the relative abundance of bacteria is as much as 24 times higher than that of fungi, according to Narunsky-Haziza et al. (8). This further supports the idea that fungi are hundreds of orders of magnitude less common than bacteria (7, 9). Secondly, when extracting DNA, the fungal DNA is more sensitive than bacterial DNA and is more influenced by the existing DNA preparation methods (10). Finally, the existing reference database of fungal genomes is incomplete (11), which also hinders the efforts to study the role of fungi in disease through culture-independent methods.

As a significant part of the microbiome, fungi are found on the surfaces of all human tissues and organ barriers (12). Fungal disorders can lead to diseases including fungal infections and even cancer. Opportunistic pathogenic fungi are prevalent in the environment where we live. An estimated 6.55 million individuals get potential fatal fungal infections annually, and 3.75 million people die from fungal diseases, which are thought to affect over 1 billion people annually (13, 14). The number of new cases is still on the rise (15) due to a number of reasons such as environmental changes and increased susceptible populations. In high-risk groups, the mortality rate after systemic fungal infections can be as high as 50% (1618). Moreover, cancer patients with immune deficiency are also high-risk populations for fungal infections (19).

Recently, an increasing body of research indicates that fungi are a common presence within a variety of tumor types and may have an impact on the onset and spread of cancer (8, 2028). The presence of cancer-specific intratumor fungi is associated with tumorigenesis in different body sites (8, 28, 29). The presence of Candida DNA in association with tumors holds promise as a potential biomarker for assessing the survival rates of cancer patients (28). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that fungi are closely associated with cancer progression and prognosis. Therefore, this review summarizes the possible roles of fungi in cancer, with the aim of offering novel insights for the prevention and treatment of cancer, particularly those strategies targeting fungi.

MYCOBIOME AND CANCER

Different degrees of fungal dysbiosis are detected in a variety of cancer types (Fig. 1), with specific dysbiotic fungal species shown in Table 1. Imbalances in mycobiome may contribute to the advancement of cancer through a complex array of mechanisms, paving the way for groundbreaking therapeutic approaches and enhanced survival outcomes for patients. Herein, we explore the complex relationship between fungi and cancer, highlighting key findings and examining the potential mechanisms that may be involved.

Fig 1.

The human body is depicted with various cancers linked to male and female. Cancers include head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, oral, breast, stomach, colorectal, cervical, ovarian, lung, liver, pancreatic, bladder, melanoma, and prostate cancer.

Schematic overview of cancer types with dysbiotic mycobiome. The composition of the fungal mycobiome has been found to be altered in various body sites associated with tumorigenesis.

TABLE 1.

A list of the fungal species implicated in various cancer types

Cancer type Fungal dysbiosis Ref.
Lung cancer Malasseziomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Diothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Aspergillus, and Malassezia differ in patients and controls. (8)
Blastomyces spp. are abundant in lung tumors. (28)
Malassezia was more abundant in the patients, whereas Candida was more abundant in the healthy subjects. (30)
Enrichment of Alternaria arborescens was found in non-small cell lung cancer cancerous tissue. (31)
Oral cancer Candida spp. was detected in patients, with Candida albicans being the most common. (3234)
It is noteworthy that three types of fungi that are particularly associated with OSCCa are Rhodotorula, Geotrichum, and Pneumocystis. (35)
Enrichment of C. albicans, Candida etchelsii, and a Hannaella luteola-like species existed in OSCC patients. (36)
In patients with OSCC, there is an observed increase in the presence of Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Acremonium exuviarum, and Aspergillus fumigatus, while there is a concurrent decrease in the levels of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Scapharca broughtonii, Mortierella echinula, and Morchella septimelata. (37)
Colorectal cancer In CRC, the fungal genera Malassezia, Moniliophthora, Rhodotorula, Acremonium, Thielaviopsis, and Pisolithus were particularly abundant. (20)
Significant increases in Microbotryomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Microascaceae, Sordariales, Lasiosphaeriaceae, and Microascales and decreases in the abundance of Pleosporaceae and Alternaria were detected in patients. (38)
Colon cancer has the highest Ascomycota-to-Basidiomycota ratio (A:B ratio) compared to other types of cancer. (8)
In colon cancer, the burden of Candida tropicalis is significantly increased. (26)
Card9−/− mice had higher Saccharomycetes representation and lower occurrences of various Ascomycota members. (27)
C. albicans was significantly overrepresented among patients. (39)
Compared to the controls, the abundance of S. cerevisiae was 2.68 times lower in CRA patients and 3.94 times lower in CRC patients. (40)
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma The tumor tissues had a much lower level of Glomeromycota than non-tumor tissues. (41)
The levels of C. albicans and Rothia mucilaginosa were different in the oral wash of HNSCC patients, whereas Schizophyllum commune was reduced. (42)
C. albicans was responsible for at least 96% of the fungal sequencing in the majority of HNSCC patients. (43)
Cervical cancer All tested ovarian cancer samples had detectable levels of Cladosporium, Pneumocystis, Acremonium, Cladophialophora, Malassezia, and Microsporidia Pleistophora. (44)
Breast cancer Malassezia spp. are abundant in breast tumors. (28)
A very strong average hybridization signal for Arthroderma was found in about 95% of ER patients. (45)
The healthy controls did not exhibit the fungal signatures of Ajellomyces, Alternaria, Cunninghamella, Epidermophyton, Filobasidiella, Rhizomucor, and Trichophyton that were found in one or more forms of breast cancer. (46)
Gastric cancer Candida DNA is enriched in tumors. (28)
Solicoccozyma was detected in greater quantity in the tumor group, but Pezizomycetes, Sordariales, Chaetomiaceae, and Rozellomycota were not as prevalent. (47)
The higher percentage of opportunistic fungi like Cutaneotrichosporon and Malassezia, as well as the higher ratio of Basidiomycota to Ascomycota, were observed in the patient group compared to the control group. (48)
Saliva and tongue coating samples from the GC showed reduced Saccharomyces cerevisiae and increased Malassezia globosa. (49)
Melanoma Among multiple cancer types, melanoma had the lowest A:B ratio due to the abundance of Malassezia. (8)
Patients with melanoma showed a noticeably greater fungal richness. (50)
Ovarian cancer In every ovarian cancer sample that was tested, indications of Pneumocystis, Acremonium, Cladophialophora, Malassezia, and Microsporidia Pleistophora were also found in large amounts. More than 95% of the ovarian cancer samples that were tested had signatures of Rhizomucor, Rhodotorula, Alternaria, and Geotrichum. (44)
Prostate cancer The most common fungal families found in prostate cancer include Microsporidia (12), yeasts (15%), zygomycetes (15%), and dermatophytes (31%). (51)
The three families that were most significantly different between PCa patients and controls were the Filobasidiales, Pyronemataceae, and Cryptococcus ater spp. (52)
Bladder cancer Increased abundance of Tremellales, Hypocreales, and Dothideales in bladder cancer patients compared to controls. (53)
Liver cancer Compared to individuals with liver cirrhosis, those with HCC had a significantly lower diversity of the gut mycobiome and a higher abundance of C. albicans. (54)
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma C. albicans was found in patients. (55, 56)
Pancreatic cancer PDA tumor tissues exhibit a high enrichment of Malassezia spp. (57)
a

CRC, colorectal cancer; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the major causes of death globally and has the highest incidence and mortality rate across all cancer types, according to the most recent cancer statistics (58). Lung cancer risks encompass both genetic factors and environmental influences, such as smoking and exposure to air pollution (59, 60). Numerous recent studies have found the presence of fungi in the tissues of lung cancer patients (8, 28, 31, 61). Higher fungal diversity was observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (31). About 2.6% of lung cancer patients will develop invasive aspergillosis (62). Others have suggested that the apparent progression of lung cancer may be due to an invasive aspergillosis infection (63). Recently, Liu et al. found the enrichment of Aspergillus sydowii in the tumor tissues of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, isolated a live fungal strain of A. sydowii through culturomics, and demonstrated its tumor-promoting mechanism by using three lung cancer pre-clinical murine models (61). In particular, by promoting interleukin (IL)-1β signaling via the β-glucan/dectin-1/CARD9 pathway (61, 64), A. sydowii improves the recruitment and activation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs, regulators of the immune system) (65). This, in turn, inhibits cytotoxic T-lymphocyte cells and increases the accumulation of PD-1+ CD8+ T cells, creating an immunosuppressive environment that accelerates the growth of lung tumors (Fig. 2A). Additionally, immunosuppression and a poor prognosis for individuals with lung cancer were linked to the enrichment of A. sydowii (61). In addition, intestinal fungi can serve as non-invasive biomarkers for LUAD (66) and are also associated with recovery of lung function and motor capacity in lung cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment (67). Thus, more attention should be focused on the mechanistic insights into the functional importance of fungi in lung cancer.

Fig 2.

The graphic depicts the role of fungal infections in lung and pancreatic cancers. It includes the impact of Aspergillus sydowii and fungal dysbiosis in tumor progression, immune modulation, and cytokine production, affecting macrophages, Tregs, MDSCs, and PDAC cells.

Illustration of possible mechanisms of fungi in the development of lung (A) and pancreatic (B) cancers. (A) Aspergillus sydowii promotes IL-1β secretion-mediated recruitment and activation of MDSCs via the β-glucan/dectin-1/CARD9 pathway. This leads to inhibition of CTL cell activity and aggregation of Tregs and PD-1+ CD8+ T cells, ultimately leading to lung cancer progression. (B) Intratumor fungi such as Alternaria and Malassezia can promote secretion of IL-33 by cancer cells, which in turn recruits and activates TH2 and ILC2 cells. This ultimately promotes the secretion of pro-tumorigenic cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Moreover, it ultimately promotes tumor progression. ↓, decrease; ↑, increase; CARD9, caspase-recruitment domain 9; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; IL, interleukin; ILC, innate lymphoid cell; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Treg, T-regulatory cell; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females, affecting up to one in five of all cancer types in women and representing a high mortality rate (1). Existing evidence has shown microbiome dysbiosis in breast cancer patients. The bacteria in the tumor can promote the metastasis of breast cancer (68), and fungi were also observed in breast tumor tissues (8, 28). Using genome-wide transcriptome amplification and pan-pathogen microarray strategies, the researchers detected shared and specific viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites in each type of breast cancer (46). Interestingly, the fungal signatures are relatively unique (45, 46). Ajellomyces, Alternaria, Cunninghamella, Epidermophyton, Filobasidiella, Rhizomucor, and Trichophyton were not found in healthy controls, despite being identified in one or more kinds of breast cancer. Ahmadi et al. investigated the connection between fungi and breast cancer using four groups of mice including normal, tumor, candidiasis (candidiasis only), and tumor/candidiasis groups (69). The study revealed that the interferon gamma (IFN-γ):IL-4 ratio was significantly lower in both the tumor/candidiasis and candidiasis groups when compared to the uninfected control group. Levels of IL-10, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were increased in the candidiasis group. Furthermore, in the tumor/candidiasis group, Candida infection boosted tumor growth and the quantity of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment (TME). These findings imply that fungi, such as Candida albicans, are associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer and promote the growth of tumors, which merits more research.

Pancreatic cancer

Despite its relatively low incidence, pancreatic cancer has a high mortality rate, with only approximately 8.5% of patients surviving 5 years post-diagnosis. Pancreatic cancer was ranked 12th in incidence and 6th in mortality among all cancer types (1).

Numerous studies have demonstrated the fungal ecological disturbances in pancreatic cancer patients (57, 70, 71). The pancreatic duct is directly connected to the small intestine, providing a pathway for microorganisms to enter into the pancreas from the intestine (72). Alam et al. identified a potential mechanism for Malassezia spp. in the progression of the fungal mycobiome that drives IL-33 secretion and type 2 immunity in pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) (57). Specifically, tumor tissue-resident fungi promote the secretion of IL-33 by cancer cells, which in turn recruits TH2 and ILC2 cells in the TME, accelerating the progression of pancreatic cancer (57) (Fig. 2B). The depletion of IL-33 or the administration of anti-fungal therapy leads to a decrease in TH2 and ILC2 infiltration and enhances survival rates. This highlights the potential clinical utility in PDAC prevention by targeting fungi.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC), which includes bowel, colon, and rectal cancers, has the second-highest death rate and the third-highest incidence rate worldwide (1). The incidence of CRC is steadily rising in both high-income countries and among young people, with the incidence rising from 1% to 4% per year (7375). A notable feature of CRC is its intimate relationship with the gut microbiota, which becomes dysbiotic throughout the development of cancer and actively participates in carcinogenesis, in addition to the significant impact of diet and lifestyle on the disease’s development (76, 77).

In general, it is believed that microbiota affects the distant or proximal tumor tissues indirectly through the immune system and metabolites, especially in CRC, which is physically in close proximity to the gut microbiota. It has been proven that dysregulation of mycobiome in the human gut, such as an increased ratio of Basidiomycota to Ascomycota, is observed in CRC patients (20). Meanwhile, the study revealed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which has anti-inflammatory properties (78), was found to be depleted in the gut of CRC patients. This suggests a potentially beneficial role for S. cerevisiae in the gut, which may contribute to the prevention and treatment of CRC (20). In addition, there exist abundant Candida spp. in CRC patients compared to healthy controls (26, 79). C. albicans may encourage the growth of CRC, indicating the presence of C. albicans-driven crosstalk between macrophages and innate lymphocytes in the intestinal environment (25). Glycolysis and the release of inflammatory IL-7 from macrophages in the lamina propria were activated by the increased burden of C. albicans caused by the depletion of the c-type lectin dectin-3 (Fig. 3A). IL-7 secretion stimulates the production of IL-22 by RORγt+ (group 3) innate lymphoid cells, which subsequently results in increased p-STAT3 levels in epithelial cells, promoting cancer development (25). In addition, C. albicans was linked not only to the prediction of advanced CRC and metastatic CRC but also with the influence of cell adhesion (28). Malignant cells may employ cell adhesion molecules to facilitate tumor growth (80). Furthermore, low fungal load was associated with higher CARD9 expression (26). Pro-inflammatory cytokines that are very specific to anti-fungal immune responses are released when CARD9 activates the NF-kB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways (81). It was found that fungal dysregulation increased the accumulation of MDSCs in tumor tissues, and the impaired bactericidal activity of macrophages resulted in increased fungal load dominated by Candida tropicalis (26). In tumor-bearing CARD9−/− mice, there was a marked upregulation of S100A9, IL-6, IL-1β, and Cxcl1 expression, with their interplay potentially facilitating the aggregation and activation of MDSCs. Furthermore, in vitro studies revealed that C. tropicalis can trigger MDSC differentiation and augment their immunosuppressive functions (Fig. 3B). In addition, they found that C. tropicalis promoted CRC development through dectin-3-induced NLRP3 inflammatory vesicle activation in MDSCs (82) (Fig. 3D), in addition to promoting chemoresistance to oxaliplatin in CRC by producing lactic acid and inhibiting MLH1 expression (83). Malik et al. found that CARD9−/− mice treated with AOM-DSS showed a higher tumor burden. The activation of the inflammasome in the colon is primarily triggered by intestinal commensal fungi, which can enhance the inflammasome activation and IL-18 maturation via the SYK-CARD9 axis. IL-18 was reported to aid in the restoration of the epithelial barrier and stimulate the production of interferon-γ by CD8+ T cells, thereby mitigating colitis and associated epithelial hyperplasia in the azoxymethane-dextran sodium sulfate mice model. Together, the intestinal commensal fungi-SYK-CARD9-IL-18 axis can provide protection against colon cancer (27) (Fig. 3C). These findings have expanded our understanding of the fungi-CRC relationship, although most experiments were conducted on mice models. Moreover, more realistic, detailed, and conclusive mechanistic studies are necessary to deepen our understanding of the pathological process and to aid in the advancement of clinical trials and applications.

Fig 3.

The graphic presents interactions between immune cells, fungal infections, and colorectal cancer. It depicts glycolysis and IL-22 production in macrophages, CARD9-deficient macrophages, epithelial restitution, immune responses, and tumor progression.

A depiction of various potential mechanisms through which fungi may facilitate the progression of colorectal cancer. (A) A higher load of Candida albicans causes macrophages to undergo glycolysis and secrete IL-7, which contributes to the development of CRC via generating IL-22 through ILC3. Fungal load and IL-22 frequency in tumor tissues have a positive correlation, indicating that this regulatory axis is closely linked to human illness. (B) The general composition of the gut microbiota changes, and the quantity of fungus, particularly Candida tropicalis, increases as a result of CARD9−/− macrophages’ impaired fungicidal action. Intestinal MDSCs are more prevalent in CARD9−/− mice, but CTL is less prevalent. (C) Intestinal fungal sensing activates the inflammasome through the CARD9-SYK signaling pathway and produces IL-18, which promotes the repair of the epithelial barrier and the T-cell response, thus inhibiting the development of inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. CARD9 or SYK deficiency alters the intestinal microecology, leading to impaired activation of the inflammasome and increasing the susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. (D) Candida tropicalis promotes transcription of NLRP, pro-caspase-1, and IL-1β genes by activating the JAK-STAT1 signaling pathway, and mtROS mediates C. tropicalis-induced activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Overall, Candida tropicalis induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation in MDSC to promote CRC progression. CARD9, caspase-recruitment domain 9; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; IL, interleukin; ILC, innate lymphoid cell; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; mtROS, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species.

In addition, fungi can also interact with bacteria through physical or biochemical mechanisms (84, 85). For instance, bacteria and fungus together can form biofilms that worsen intestinal inflammation (86, 87). Hager et al. found that the relationship between bacteria and fungi was Candida specific and inhibited the emergence of germination when the probiotic filtrate was co-incubated with C. albicans (88). Thus, the role of this interaction in CRC progression cannot be ignored, which may provide new ideas for future anti-fungal and anti-cancer therapy (89).

Moreover, it was discovered that patulin (PAT), a toxin secreted by fungi such as Aspergillus spp. which often contaminate fruits, is able to change intestinal epithelial cells (90). Long-term low-dose PAT exposure increases cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while in vivo evidence suggests that PAT-exposed Wistar rats develop colonic aberrant crypt foci, a marker for early CRC (90).

In conclusion, an increasing body of research has identified associations between fungi and CRC, confirming the complex mechanisms by which fungi promote cancer and their interactions with other microorganisms. Our comprehension of the complex interplay among fungi, gut microbiota, and CRC development will be significantly enhanced by research in this field.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC), which accounted for nearly 1 million new cases in 2020, was ranked as the sixth largest malignant tumor in the world (1). The high-risk populations of GC include those who smoke, drink alcohol, have a history of stomach disorders, or have GC in the family tree of a first-degree relative (91).

The abundance of Pezizomycetes, Sordariales, Chaetomiaceae, and Rozellomycota was lower in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues (47). Moreover, Solicoccozyma is differentially enriched in tumor tissues and may be used as a fungal biomarker to differentiate between stage I and stage II and III with an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) of 0.7061 (47). Additionally, using functional prediction, the expression of Solicoccozyma in tumor tissue was favorably correlated with the metabolic pathway connected to amino acids and carbohydrates (47). C. albicans, Fusicolla acetilerea, Arcopilus aureus, and Fusicolla aquaeductuum were enriched in GC, while Candida glabrata, Aspergillus montevidensis, Saitozyma podzolica, and Penicillium arenicola were considerably decreased (92). They found that Malassezia globosa was shown to be more abundant in samples of saliva and tongue coating obtained from patients with GC, while Saccharomyces cerevisiae was decreased. Moreover, Malassezia globosa can be used as a functional marker to detect GC (49). Furthermore, patients with GC have also been found to have Malassezia disorders (47, 93), and Malassezia is believed to be a gastric fungus associated with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and with overall survival in patients with GC (93), which are worth looking into for learning more about how this fungus and PD-L1 work.

In addition, it was found that Candida had a favorable correlation with Lactobacillus and negatively correlated with Helicobacter pylori. The upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-6, may contribute to the progression of cancer (94). Moreover, inflammation could promote the colonization of Candida, which in turn could maintain a pro-inflammatory environment by increasing its own inflammatory response (28). Consequently, the overall survival rate for cancer patients may be raised by preventing and treating Candida infections. While these studies indicate a potential correlation between specific fungi and GC, with diagnostic implications, there is currently insufficient evidence to establish causality. Therefore, ongoing attention and further research by scientists are necessary in the future.

Liver cancer

Liver cancer ranks sixth in incidence among all cancer types and third in all cancer deaths (1). According to the recent statistics, opportunistic fungal species including Malassezia and Candida are more prevalent in the gut microbiota of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than in healthy subjects and cirrhosis patients (95). Fungal diversity was also reduced in HCC and cirrhosis patients in contrast to healthy subjects. In addition, the abundance of C. albicans in patients with early HCC is lower than that in patients with advanced stages of HCC. Aflatoxins, which are produced by Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus nomius, and Aspergillus parasiticus, are produced in the liver by cytochrome P450 epoxidation to form genotoxins (e.g., aflatoxin B1 exo-8,9 epoxides). After being introduced into the DNA, these extremely electrophilic epoxides quickly alkylate N7-guanine residues (96). This can then lead to mistakes in DNA-adduct replication or repair, leading to liver cancer.

Moreover, Candida spp., especially C. albicans, are essential to the etiology and development of nearly all hepatobiliary disorders (6). It was found that C. albicans could affect the development of HCC (54). In contrast to individuals with cirrhosis, they discovered that patients with HCC had a higher quantity of C. albicans and a lower diversity of gut microbiota. Additionally, it was noted that oral gavage of C. albicans enhanced tumor weight and size in a mouse model, as well as the expression of nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 6 (NLRP6). However, colonization by C. albicans did not influence tumor growth in NLRP6-deficient mice. Thus, aberrant colonization by C. albicans could promote NLRP6-dependent HCC progression (Fig. 4A).

Fig 4.

The graphic presents the role of fungal infections in cancer progression. It illustrates Candida albicans and other fungi affecting tumor development in liver, esophageal, and oral cancers, with immune responses, cytokine production, and inflammatory pathways.

Potential mechanisms of fungi in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (A), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (B), and oral cancer (C). (A) Increased intestinal Candida albicans load promotes hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating NLRP6. (B) The IKK-αKA/KA mouse model suggests that autoreactive CD4 T cells contribute to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by promoting inflammation through fungal infection and tissue injury. (C) One mechanism suggests that Candida albicans promotes infiltration of TAMs via the IL-17A/IL-17RA pathway and that attracted TAMs polarize into M2-like macrophages that highly express PD-L1 and GAL-9 to influence tumor progression. Another mechanism is thought to be that Candida can influence cancer progression by producing alcohol dehydrogenase, which converts alcohol to acetaldehyde. ↓, decrease; ↑, increase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; GAL-9, galectin-9; IL, interleukin; NLRP6, nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 6; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage.

Cervical cancer

The global women’s health is impacted by cervical cancer, a malignant tumor with a high morbidity and death rate (1). Candida is a symbiotic fungus found in the healthy vagina, and it has a high prevalence in patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) (97). Yeast forms of Candida are mostly present in healthy women, while hyphal forms of Candida can be isolated from patients with severe VVC. This result supports the correlation between the morphology of Candida and pathogenicity (98). Candida’s morphological change is significantly influenced by the interaction between fungi and bacteria. For example, the growth of Candida and its transformation from the non-toxic yeast form to the toxic hyphal form are generally inhibited by low pH and bactericidal chemicals released by bacteria (99, 100). According to a different study, one of the key constituents of the vaginal microbiome can enhance the local immune response of vaginal epithelial cells and reduce the pathogenicity of C. albicans. This is achieved by increasing the expression of IL-2, IL-6, and IL-17 while simultaneously decreasing the expression of IL-8 (101). These findings imply that Lactobacillus and Candida interactions may be crucial for preserving the balance of the vaginal microbiota and that disturbance of Candida may result in infection (102).

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a major disease affecting human health and quality of life, ranking 11th in incidence and accounting for 4.6% of all cases of death (1). Fungal dysbiosis, ulcers, and esophagitis are common in ESCC patients, suggesting a potential correlation between fungi and ESCC development (55). The relationship between ESCC and fungal infection was investigated by using the kin-dead IKk-α knockin (IKk-αKA/KA) mice model. The mice developed esophageal squamous cell cancer, exhibiting autoinflammation, a persistent fungal infection, and reduced central tolerance. The damaged thymus microenvironment produces autoreactive T cells, which allow fungal infection and trigger tissue damage and inflammation. Moreover, the researchers detected fungi in human ESCC tissue specimens but not in normal human tissue, and a statistically significant difference was observed between fungal infections and human ESCC. In addition, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the target of IKKα, an oncogene that can drive the development of squamous cell carcinoma (103). Inhibiting inflammation or IKKα’s target EGFR activity reduces fungal load. Anti-fungal therapy or auto-reactive CD4 T-cell depletion can promote ESCC treatment (Fig. 4B). The findings suggest that deficiencies in immune and epithelial cells work together to promote chronic fungal infections and the development of ESCC.

Oral cancer

The oral microbiota, which is the second most abundant microbiome in the human body, is present in the oral cavity (104). Oral cancer (OC) is also a serious threat to people’s health and a serious public health problem (105). Most OCs are diagnosed after they have progressed significantly, so they have a high mortality rate (106). Several studies have found that patients with oral Candida infections have an increased risk of OC compared to the control (32, 107). About 74% of OC patients in a case-control study had Candida, with C. albicans emerging as the predominant strain (84%) (33). One possible mechanism suggests that Candida can produce ethanol dehydrogenase, which converts alcohol to acetaldehyde (ACH), impacting cancer development (108, 109) (Fig. 4C). ACH consumed with alcoholic beverages has been identified as a Group I human carcinogen (110). Excessive alcohol intake can increase the production of ACH in saliva (111). Non-drinkers may develop OC as a result of oral metabolism of glucose into ACH by C. albicans (112). Individuals with poor oral health can detect twice as much ACH as those with good oral hygiene (109). There was a strong correlation between the amount of ACH in saliva and the prevalence of Candida (113). Among these, it has been demonstrated that OC is associated with the virulence characteristics of C. albicans and the production of ACH (34). Certain host cellular proteins may interact with alcohol dehydrogenase, resulting in an immunological reaction, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and other mediators that ultimately cause inflammation and DNA damage (109). By generating carcinogenic nitrosamines, invasion of Candida hyphae may possibly be a factor in oral leukoplakia’s malignant development (114, 115). Proto-oncogenes that cause malignant transformation in the host may be activated by nitrosamine complexes (116).

Candida spp., Malassezia spp., Saccharomyces spp., and Aspergillus spp. exhibited a significant prevalence in individuals with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to those without OSCC (117), and there is in vitro and in vivo evidence that C. albicans is involved in malignant promotion and progression of OC (118). From the standpoint of TME, Zhi-Min Yan’s group identified a possible mechanism by which C. albicans encourages OC (119). Specifically, C. albicans can promote tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration through the IL-17A/IL-17RA pathway, while the TAMs are polarized into M2-like macrophages that express PD-L1 and galectin-9 at high levels. Conversely, in mice infected with C. albicans, both the neutralization of IL-17A and the depletion of macrophages were observed to reduce the number of TAMs and the size of the tumor (Fig. 4C).

Thus, it was demonstrated that fungi can contribute to the development of OC, and further research in other cancer models and environments is also required.

Skin cancer

The skin, which is the body’s outermost covering, is typically where environmental microbes and the host first come into touch with (120). Cutaneous melanoma is also one of the cancers that affect human health and causes the most skin cancer-related deaths globally (1). Malassezia, which relies on long-chain fatty acids, is the main symbiotic skin fungus (8, 120). Vitali et al. conducted a meta-analysis of intestinal microbiota in patients with metastatic melanoma and examined the makeup of intestinal bacteria and fungus in patients with stage I and stage II melanoma (50). They observed high levels of Prevotella copri and yeast in the cancer group. Another important finding was that the composition of the gut microbiota changed along a gradient from in situ to malignant melanoma in early melanoma. Alterations in the microbiota may be associated with the clinical outcome of advanced melanoma and response to immunotherapy through direct or indirect immunomodulatory effects. Similarly, evidence from Shiao et al. suggests that fungi can modulate the TME through immune regulation, thereby affecting the therapeutic efficacy of tumors (121). However, the causal relationship between fungi and melanoma development awaits further validation.

Certain fungi, primarily Penicillium, can produce clavaflatoxin PAT (122), which mainly contaminates fruits such as ripe apples (123). In mammalian cells, PAT can induce DNA damage, chromosome aberration, and genotoxicity (124, 125). By producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and damaging DNA, it may aid in the development of cancer (126, 127). The results of Saxena et al. showed that the skin of mice treated with PAT could promote the accumulation of ROS production; further induce the MAPK signaling pathway; activate downstream c-fos, c-jun, and NF-kB protein expression; and finally lead to cell proliferation, indicating that PAT had the potential to promote skin cancer (128). However, the carcinogenic mechanism of this toxin requires further study.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

In tumor samples of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), Glomeromycota is significantly decreased compared with non-tumor tissues (41).

Candida is the most common oral fungal genus in both HNSCC patients and healthy individuals (42, 43) and is intimately associated with the risk of developing various types of cancer, including HNSCC (32). Compared with the control group, the diversity of oral wash fluid in HNSCC patients was decreased. While Schizophyllum commune was decreased, C. albicans and Rothia mucilaginosa were both differentially abundant (42). Consistently, Vesty et al. showed that C. albicans dominated the fungal community in the saliva of HNSCC patients, accounting for 96% of the total fungal community (43), and there was a positive correlation between C. albicans abundance and IL-1β or IL-8 (43).

Other types of cancer

Prostate cancer

One of the leading causes of morbidity and death among men is prostate cancer (1). Banerjee et al. identified microbial signatures associated with prostate cancer, mostly with fungal genera derived from Ascomycota (51). Similarly, plasma samples from patients with prostate cancer have been found to exhibit fungal dysbiosis, and certain fungal genera are associated with prostate-specific antigen levels and pathological stages (52). However, further comprehensive study is required to elucidate the exact mechanism and ascertain the existence of a causal relationship.

Bladder cancer

Bukavina et al. performed internal transcribed spacer sequencing on stool samples from 52 bladder cancer patients and the healthy control to evaluate the similarities and differences in intestinal mycobiome. By examining antigen presentation, it was found that patients with a “favorable” fungal microbiota composition, characterized by high diversity and low levels of Agaricomycetes and Saccharomycetes, may exhibit a more robust systemic immune response to chemotherapy (53). These findings shed light on the makeup of the gut fungal population in patients with bladder cancer as well as the possible influence of these fungi on the efficacy of treatment.

Leukemia

Leukemia is the most common childhood tumor, accounting for 28% of cases, which is one of the human malignant tumors (1, 129). Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are particularly vulnerable to invasive Aspergillus infections. Such infections occurring during the first induction chemotherapy can delay subsequent treatment plans and are among the factors that affect the recovery of AML patients (130). Additionally, it has been the most frequent infectious cause of mortality for leukemia patients, particularly those with AML.

Ovarian cancer

The microbiome in ovarian cancer patients exhibited a significant disruption, with 18 distinct fungal signatures identified in the tumor samples that were absent in the control group. Pneumocystis, Acremonium, Cladophialophora, Malassezia, and Microsporidia Pleistophora are notably present in tumor tissues (44).

Although fungal research lags behind that of bacteria, tumor-associated fungal research is now rapidly evolving. Although there are a lot of interesting outcomes right now, more research is required in the future to establish the causal link between fungal traits and the development of cancer. Future research in this area is promising and rewarding, which will provide additional insights into the intricate interplay between fungi and cancer development.

MYCOBIOME AND ANTI-CANCER THERAPY

Given the critical role of fungi in cancer progression, it was urgent and necessary to develop potential therapeutic strategies by targeting fungi for cancer prevention and control (Fig. 5).

Fig 5.

The graphic depicts fungal components, probiotics, metabolites, and fecal microbiota transplants. It includes β-glucan, beneficial probiotics, fungal metabolites like Schisandra polysaccharide, and fecal transplant potential for cancer prevention and treatment.

The role of fungi in anti-cancer therapy. New indirect effects of fungi on cancer may be utilized in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. (A) On the therapeutic side, fungal components, such as β-glucan, can be a target for cancer therapy. (B) Fungi could be supplemented as “precision probiotics” or could be engineered to specifically release cancer-suppressive vectors. (C) Secondary metabolites of fungi have potential for pharmaceutical applications. (D) The disordered intestinal mycobiome could be modulated by fecal transplantation.

Fungal components

Through the stimulation and/or activation of innate immune cells, β-glucan, one of the fungal cell wall components that represents pathogen-associated molecular patterns, can regulate host immune responses (131). Zhang et al. demonstrated that systemic injection of certain β-glucans can successfully regulate TME, which, in turn, greatly inhibits tumor development and distant metastasis (132). According to the findings, β-glucan may be an immunomodulator that enhances the efficacy of immunotherapy against cancer (133). In addition to systemic administration, oral glucan treatment can regulate the transformation of M2 macrophages into M1-like phenotypes, which significantly reduces tumor load and delays tumor growth (134, 135). Prophylactic treatment with pure β-glucan can considerably increase the longevity of tumor-bearing mice in the tumor mice model and block lung metastasis in a dose-dependent manner. Therapeutic administration of purified β-glucan also significantly inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells (136). Others have also found that combined β-glucan can reduce tumor burden, improve overall survival in experimental animals, and increase the efficacy of immunotherapy (137, 138).

Another clinical study was conducted to evaluate the short-term effects of oral β-glucan on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, involving 23 advanced stages of breast cancer patients (139). Patients with breast cancer had a much lower baseline lymphocyte count than those without the disease (P = 0.04). At day 15 of administration, the mean monocyte count in breast cancer patients was noticeably higher (P = 0.015). On CD14-positive monocytes, CD95 (Apo1/Fas) expression was increased from 48.17% at the start of treatment to 69.23% on day 15 (P = 0.002). Additionally, there was a noteworthy increase in CD45RA expression in CD14-positive monocytes (P = 0.001).

Imprime PGG, which is a soluble β-glucan and an innate immunomodulator for anti-cancer immunotherapy, directly activates innate immune cells and induces a coordinated anti-tumor immune response (140). This anti-cancer effect is contingent upon the formation of an immunological complex involving naturally occurring anti-α-glucan antibodies (141). In summary, the results of the above studies have proven the utility of β-glucan in anti-cancer prevention and treatment.

Driving infection and host immunological responses requires the cytolytic peptide toxin known as candidalysin, which is released by Candida spp. (142144). Candidalysin and C. albicans both activate EGFR, and in vitro administration of EGFR kinase inhibitors, such as the Food and Drug Administration-approved gefitinib, prevents the release of neutrophil-activating cytokines and MAPK signaling that is triggered by candidalysin and Candida albicans (145). In addition, a team of researchers has also found that C. albicans induces upregulation of PD-L1 (a crucial indicator of tumor immune evasion and tumor development) in OSCC both in vitro and in mice models (146).

It is evident that molecules such as EGFR, PD-L1, β-glucan, and others are potential targets for therapeutic interventions in cancer types where fungal infection serves as a potential oncogenic mechanism and deserves further investigation in the future for their potential applications in cancer therapy.

Probiotics

Probiotics, which can inhibit biofilm formation in C. albicans or C. tropicalis (88) and also mediate anti-cancer effects through the immune system, are a promising anti-cancer biotherapeutic drug (147149).

Galinari et al. evaluated the activity of the cell wall component α-d-mannan fractions for antioxidant, anti-proliferative, and immunostimulating properties (150). It was shown that Aspergillus oryza heptelidic acid can have anti-tumor effects via the p38-MAPK signaling pathway in an in vitro pancreatic cancer cell and in vivo xenograft model (149).

A probiotic called Saccharomyces boulardii has anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties that can regulate host inflammatory response by down-regulating Erk1/2 MAP kinase activities (151). Apart from its anti-inflammatory properties, S. bouldarii inhibits the EGFR signaling pathway and other receptor tyrosine kinases, the activation of which leads to cell proliferation, invasion, and inhibition of apoptosis (152). The EGFR-Mek-Erk pathway in colon cancer cells is inactivated by S. bouldarii (151), which inhibits the growth and colony formation of colon cancer cells, deactivates Akt, a crucial signaling protein for cell survival, and triggers apoptosis in cancer cells (153). Therefore, the clinical application of S. bouldarii in the prevention and management of intestinal disorders is worthy of further study. In addition, S. cerevisiae, S. bouldarii (S. cerevisiae variant), and Schizophyllum commune have been shown to exert beneficial effects such as antioxidants (40, 154). Consequently, the fungus itself may be utilized as a probiotic to treat and prevent cancer. In addition, fungi-bacterial interactions can also provide insights into anti-fungal treatments. Hager et al.’s team found that the levels of C. tropicalis, Escherichia coli, and Serratia marcescens in patients with Crohn’s disease were elevated, and C. tropicalis formed polymicrobial biofilms with E. coli and S. marcescens (88, 155). Furthermore, they developed a new probiotic combination consisting of S. bouldarii, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Bifidobacterium breve that can reduce the tumor burden of CRC through prevention and treatment of polymicrobial biofilms (88). Additionally, Saccharomyces burra can prevent bacterial growth by producing significant quantities of acetic acid, which may be related to its probiotics (156). Fungal biomarkers performed better, and the AUROCs were enhanced when combined with bacterial markers, according to the results of a study that used fecal metagenomic data from 862 samples of nine different cohorts to predict gut microbial response to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). It identified a fungal profile of ICI response and multi-kingdom microbial markers, which may increase the overall efficacy of ICI therapy (157). Multi-kingdom biomarkers that combined bacterial and fungal biomarkers enhanced the performance of CRC diagnostic models, according to another study of 1,368 samples from eight different geographic cohorts (23). This suggests that multi-kingdom biomarkers can be applied as both a potential therapeutic target and a diagnostic model for CRC.

The depletion of intestinal symbiotic fungi could increase the efficacy of radiotherapy, while loss of symbiotic bacteria leads to the expansion of pathogenic fungi and the depletion of symbiotic fungi (121, 158). This study suggested the importance of targeting microbial communities to enhance the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment. Therefore, the combination of probiotics and radiotherapy may enhance the therapeutic efficacy against cancer.

Fungal metabolites

Fungal secondary metabolites are important in the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors, which may be useful in pharmaceutical applications (159161).

Recently, there are 61 endophytic fungal strains discovered from the bark of plants like Albizzia julibrissin and Ginkgo biloba (162). MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay showed that the growth inhibition of human esophageal cancer cells was greater than 50% at 200 µg/mL (162). He et al. isolated the endophytic fungal secondary metabolites from Ginkgo biloba leaves and discovered that they could dramatically reduce the formation of Hela-implanted tumors in mice, promote the death of Hela cells, and limit the proliferation of Hela cells (163). López-Legarda et al. identified Schizophyllum radiatum and found that its external polysaccharides exhibited anti-tumor activity (164).

Schisandra polysaccharide (SPG) is a substance produced by the fermentation of Schisandra chinensis that can be used to treat cervical cancer (165). It had strong immunomodulatory activities in vivo. After ultrasonic treatment, SPG fractions had stronger immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effects (166).

Lung cancer is strongly inhibited by fungal immunomodulatory proteins, which are broadly distributed in fungi. The 114 amino acid residues that make up the fungal immunomodulatory protein from Nectria haematococca (FIP-nha) can prevent lung cancer cells from growing in vivo by blocking the PI3K/Akt pathway (167). Similarly, colletofragarone A2 isolated from the fungus Colletotrichum spp. (13S020) reduced the level of mutant p53 and inhibited cancer cell growth in vivo (167). Darvishi et al. found that a new yeast L-asparaginase generated from Yarrowia lipolytica inhibits the proliferation and migration of lung (A549) and breast (MCF7) cancer cells, providing enzyme therapies that can be used in anti-cancer treatment (168).

Overall, these results supplement our understanding of fungal secondary metabolites as small molecules for anti-cancer therapy, and whether they can be applied to human anti-cancer therapy warrants additional research.

Fecal microbiota transplantation

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) restores the normal microbiota composition and function, which can effectively inhibit recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (169, 170). Nevertheless, it was also discovered that a significant concentration of C. albicans in donor stool is linked to reduced efficacy of FMT. In CDI animal models, C. albicans decreases the efficacy of FMT; however, anti-fungal therapy can increase the efficacy, confirming the connection between intestinal fungal dysbiosis and decreased FMT efficacy in CDI patients (171). Furthermore, clinical response is linked to Candida abundance prior to FMT, whereas disease improvement is indicated by a decrease in Candida abundance following FMT (172). Thus, FMT has been successfully used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Additionally, the data imply that FMT might lessen the pro-inflammatory immunological response caused by Candida (172). Serum IFN-γ, IL-4, and TGF-β levels were significantly reduced, and apoptosis was induced by gavage with C. albicans isolated from the feces of healthy older adults (173).

Therefore, FMT may offer benefits in the treatment of CRC (174), which awaits further in-depth investigation and more clinical evidence.

DISCUSSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Although lagging far behind the study of bacteria in cancer progression, the investigation of fungi is still a promising field. By inducing inflammation through fungal components, biofilm formation, interactions with bacteria, or the generation of secondary carcinogenic compounds, fungi can have a role in both the onset and development of cancer (175). However, fungi are involved in both the diagnosis and therapy of cancer in addition to the progression of disease (174, 176). The idea of employing various fungal combinations as biomarkers for various malignancies is further made possible by the discovery that fungal ecologies, particularly fungi-bacterial interactions, are distinct in different cancer types (8, 22). Furthermore, in mouse models of melanoma and breast cancer, gut fungus can alter the efficacy of radiation therapy (121). Fungal components and the secreted small molecule metabolites also have anti-cancer properties, providing a promising but remaining premature therapeutic strategy.

Although increasingly acknowledged, the involvement of fungi in tumorigenesis remains a relatively novel field of investigation. This compelling evidence increased our notion that fungi could be linked to particular cancer types, and it is reasonable to assume that tumor types harboring intratumor bacteria might also contain fungi (177). This presents both promising hypotheses and poses significant challenges for research in this field. There are some inconsistencies and even conflicting results in the current findings (8, 28, 178, 179), which may stem from advancements in the pipeline and analytical methods used (178, 180). This underscores scientists’ great enthusiasm and scientific rigor in the field while also emphasizing the importance of employing standardized protocols for identifying and decontaminating low-biomass and highly contaminant-prone data, such as the microbiome in tissues (8, 28, 70, 178180). When sampling, it is important to include normal tissues whenever ethically permissible and feasible (8). Negative controls should be set for steps that could introduce contamination, such as sampling, DNA extraction, and library preparation (8, 28, 61). Data should be processed using the most comprehensive analytics pipeline currently available, tailored to the type and purpose of the data, while incorporating the latest iterations of existing analytics. Additionally, the reference genome is being updated (181, 182), and the comprehensive version should be selected for analysis. Confirming the presence of intratumor microbiota through staining, culturing, and other experimental methods would provide more rigorous and solid evidence (8, 61, 183). Ultimately, after the data analysis has generated the underlying hypothesis, more extensive and refined experiments should be carried out to test it (61, 68). Finally, as sequencing technology and bioinformatics analysis continue to progress, it is promising to fully understand the direct carcinogenic or anti-cancer effects of fungal species through integrated multi-omics analysis, aiming to achieve the tertiary prevention of cancer.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all lab members of the Liu lab at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32422004 and 32270202), MOST Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2304703 and 2020YFA0907200), Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (23XD1422300), and the innovative research teams of high-level local universities in Shanghai.

Biographies

graphic file with name mmbr.00261-24.f006.gif

Yan-Yan Sun received her B.A. in Nursing from Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and conducted her Master research in Ning-Ning Liu's lab, where she focused on the mechanistic study of fungal infection and novel antifungal agent identification.

graphic file with name mmbr.00261-24.f007.gif

Ning-Ning Liu obtained his B.A. from Shanxi Agricultural University and his Ph.D. from Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, in 2012. After graduation, he continued his research in Harvard Medical School/Boston Children’s Hospital as a post-doctoral researcher. In 2017, he joined the School of Public Health in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, where he is still a faculty member. Dr. Liu’s research has been focused on fungal infection and cancer progression, with particular interest in the mechanism of fungus-host interaction and the causal relationship between fungi and cancer.

Contributor Information

Ning-Ning Liu, Email: fenghu704@163.com.

Joseph Heitman, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. 2024. GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 74:229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. de Martel C, Georges D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Clifford GM. 2020. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob Health 8:e180–e190. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30488-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Thomas S, Izard J, Walsh E, Batich K, Chongsathidkiet P, Clarke G, Sela DA, Muller AJ, Mullin JM, Albert K, Gilligan JP, DiGuilio K, Dilbarova R, Alexander W, Prendergast GC. 2017. The host microbiome regulates and maintains human health: a primer and perspective for non-microbiologists. Cancer Res 77:1783–1812. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fang Y, Lei Z, Zhang L, Liu CH, Chai Q. 2024. Regulatory functions and mechanisms of human microbiota in infectious diseases. hLife 2:496–513. doi: 10.1016/j.hlife.2024.03.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. 2016. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol 14:e1002533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hartmann P, Schnabl B. 2023. Fungal infections and the fungal microbiome in hepatobiliary disorders. J Hepatol 78:836–851. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, et al. 2010. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Narunsky-Haziza L, Sepich-Poore GD, Livyatan I, Asraf O, Martino C, Nejman D, Gavert N, Stajich JE, Amit G, González A, et al. 2022. Pan-cancer analyses reveal cancer-type-specific fungal ecologies and bacteriome interactions. Cell 185:3789–3806. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Huffnagle GB, Noverr MC. 2013. The emerging world of the fungal microbiome. Trends Microbiol 21:334–341. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vesty A, Biswas K, Taylor MW, Gear K, Douglas RG. 2017. Evaluating the impact of DNA extraction method on the representation of human oral bacterial and fungal communities. PLoS ONE 12:e0169877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Limon JJ, Skalski JH, Underhill DM. 2017. Commensal fungi in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 22:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Iliev ID, Leonardi I. 2017. Fungal dysbiosis: immunity and interactions at mucosal barriers. Nat Rev Immunol 17:635–646. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kainz K, Bauer MA, Madeo F, Carmona-Gutierrez D. 2020. Fungal infections in humans: the silent crisis. MIC 7:143–145. doi: 10.15698/mic2020.06.718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. 2017. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases—estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel) 3:57. doi: 10.3390/jof3040057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Houšť J, Spížek J, Havlíček V. 2020. Antifungal drugs. Metabolites 10:106. doi: 10.3390/metabo10030106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhang T-Y, Chen Y-Q, Tan J-C, Zhou J-A, Chen W-N, Jiang T, Zha J-Y, Zeng X-K, Li B-W, Wei L-Q, Zou Y, Zhang L-Y, Hong Y-M, Wang X-L, Zhu R-Z, Xu W-X, Xi J, Wang Q-Q, Pan L, Zhang J, Luan Y, Zhu R-X, Wang H, Chen C, Liu N-N. 2024. Global fungal-host interactome mapping identifies host targets of candidalysin. Nat Commun 15:1757. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46141-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. d’Enfert C, Kaune A-K, Alaban L-R, Chakraborty S, Cole N, Delavy M, Kosmala D, Marsaux B, Fróis-Martins R, Morelli M, et al. 2021. The impact of the Fungus-Host-Microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: current knowledge and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev 45:fuaa060. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rasheed M, Battu A, Kaur R. 2020. Host-pathogen interaction in Candida glabrata infection: current knowledge and implications for antifungal therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 18:1093–1103. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1792773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wen S-R, Yang Z-H, Dong T-X, Li Y-Y, Cao Y-K, Kuang Y-Q, Li H-B. 2022. Deep fungal infections among general hospital inpatients in southwestern China: a 5-year retrospective study. Front Public Health 10:842434. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Coker OO, Nakatsu G, Dai RZ, Wu WKK, Wong SH, Ng SC, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Yu J. 2019. Enteric fungal microbiota dysbiosis and ecological alterations in colorectal cancer. Gut 68:654–662. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Richard ML, Liguori G, Lamas B, Brandi G, da Costa G, Hoffmann TW, Pierluigi Di Simone M, Calabrese C, Poggioli G, Langella P, Campieri M, Sokol H. 2018. Mucosa-associated microbiota dysbiosis in colitis associated cancer. Gut Microbes 9:131–142. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1379637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hanahan D. 2022. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov 12:31–46. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liu N-N, Jiao N, Tan J-C, Wang Z, Wu D, Wang A-J, Chen J, Tao L, Zhou C, Fang W, Cheong IH, Pan W, Liao W, Kozlakidis Z, Heeschen C, Moore GG, Zhu L, Chen X, Zhang G, Zhu R, Wang H. 2022. Multi-kingdom microbiota analyses identify bacterial-fungal interactions and biomarkers of colorectal cancer across cohorts. Nat Microbiol 7:238–250. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01030-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lin Y, Lau H-H, Liu Y, Kang X, Wang Y, Ting N-N, Kwong T-Y, Han J, Liu W, Liu C, She J, Wong SH, Sung J-Y, Yu J. 2022. Altered mycobiota signatures and enriched pathogenic Aspergillus rambellii are associated with colorectal cancer based on multicohort fecal metagenomic analyses. Gastroenterology 163:908–921. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhu Y, Shi T, Lu X, Xu Z, Qu J, Zhang Z, Shi G, Shen S, Hou Y, Chen Y, Wang T. 2021. Fungal‐induced glycolysis in macrophages promotes colon cancer by enhancing innate lymphoid cell secretion of IL‐22. EMBO J 40:e105320. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang T, Fan C, Yao A, Xu X, Zheng G, You Y, Jiang C, Zhao X, Hou Y, Hung M-C, Lin X. 2018. The adaptor protein CARD9 protects against colon cancer by restricting mycobiota-mediated expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Immunity 49:504–514. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Malik A, Sharma D, Malireddi RKS, Guy CS, Chang T-C, Olsen SR, Neale G, Vogel P, Kanneganti T-D. 2018. SYK-CARD9 signaling axis promotes gut fungi-mediated inflammasome activation to restrict colitis and colon cancer. Immunity 49:515–530. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Dohlman AB, Klug J, Mesko M, Gao IH, Lipkin SM, Shen X, Iliev ID. 2022. A pan-cancer mycobiome analysis reveals fungal involvement in gastrointestinal and lung tumors. Cell 185:3807–3822. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zong Z, Zhou F, Zhang L. 2023. The fungal mycobiome: a new hallmark of cancer revealed by pan-cancer analyses. Sig Transduct Target Ther 8:50. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01334-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bello S, Vengoechea JJ, Ponce-Alonso M, Figueredo AL, Mincholé E, Rezusta A, Gambó P, Pastor JMJavier Galeano del Campo R. 2021. Core microbiota in central lung cancer with streptococcal enrichment as a possible diagnostic marker. Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) 57:681–689. doi: 10.1016/j.arbr.2020.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zhao Y, Yi J, Xiang J, Jia W, Chen A, Chen L, Zheng L, Zhou W, Wu M, Yu Z, Tang J. 2023. Exploration of lung mycobiome in the patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Microbiol 23:81. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02790-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chung L-M, Liang J-A, Lin C-L, Sun L-M, Kao C-H. 2017. Cancer risk in patients with candidiasis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Oncotarget 8:63562–63573. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mäkinen A, Nawaz A, Mäkitie A, Meurman JH. 2018. Role of non-albicans Candida and Candida albicans in oral squamous cell cancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76:2564–2571. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Alnuaimi AD, Ramdzan AN, Wiesenfeld D, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Kolev SD, Reynolds EC, McCullough MJ. 2016. Candida virulence and ethanol-derived acetaldehyde production in oral cancer and non-cancer subjects. Oral Dis 22:805–814. doi: 10.1111/odi.12565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Banerjee S, Tian T, Wei Z, Peck KN, Shih N, Chalian AA, O’Malley BW, Weinstein GS, Feldman MD, Alwine J, Robertson ES. 2017. Microbial signatures associated with oropharyngeal and oral squamous cell carcinomas. Sci Rep 7:4036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03466-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Perera M, Al-Hebshi NN, Perera I, Ipe D, Ulett GC, Speicher DJ, Chen T, Johnson NW. 2017. A dysbiotic mycobiome dominated by Candida albicans is identified within oral squamous-cell carcinomas. J Oral Microbiol 9:1385369. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2017.1385369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Heng W, Wang W, Dai T, Jiang P, Lu Y, Li R, Zhang M, Xie R, Zhou Y, Zhao M, Duan N, Ye Z, Yan F, Wang X. 2022. Oral bacteriome and mycobiome across stages of oral carcinogenesis. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0273722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02737-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gao R, Kong C, Li H, Huang L, Qu X, Qin N, Qin H. 2017. Dysbiosis signature of mycobiota in colon polyp and colorectal cancer. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36:2457–2468. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3085-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Starý L, Mezerová K, Vysloužil K, Zbořil P, Skalický P, Stašek M, Raclavský V. 2020. Candida albicans culture from a rectal swab can be associated with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Folia Microbiol 65:989–994. doi: 10.1007/s12223-020-00807-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Li JQ, Li JL, Xie YH, Wang Y, Shen XN, Qian Y, Han JX, Chen YX, Fang J. 2020. Saccharomyces cerevisiae may serve as a probiotic in colorectal cancer by promoting cancer cell apoptosis. J of Digest Diseases 21:571–582. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mukherjee PK, Wang H, Retuerto M, Zhang H, Burkey B, Ghannoum MA, Eng C. 2017. Bacteriome and mycobiome associations in oral tongue cancer. Oncotarget 8:97273–97289. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Shay E, Sangwan N, Padmanabhan R, Lundy S, Burkey B, Eng C. 2020. Bacteriome and mycobiome and bacteriome-mycobiome interactions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 11:2375–2386. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Vesty A, Gear K, Biswas K, Radcliff FJ, Taylor MW, Douglas RG. 2018. Microbial and inflammatory‐based salivary biomarkers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dent Res 4:255–262. doi: 10.1002/cre2.139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Banerjee S, Tian T, Wei Z, Shih N, Feldman MD, Alwine JC, Coukos G, Robertson ES. 2017. The ovarian cancer oncobiome. Oncotarget 8:36225–36245. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Banerjee S, Wei Z, Tian T, Bose D, Shih NNC, Feldman MD, Khoury T, De Michele A, Robertson ES. 2021. Prognostic correlations with the microbiome of breast cancer subtypes. Cell Death Dis 12:831. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04092-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Banerjee S, Tian T, Wei Z, Shih N, Feldman MD, Peck KN, DeMichele AM, Alwine JC, Robertson ES. 2018. Distinct microbial signatures associated with different breast cancer types. Front Microbiol 9:951. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zhang Z, Feng H, Qiu Y, Xu Z, Xie Q, Ding W, Liu H, Li G. 2022. Dysbiosis of gastric mucosal fungal microbiota in the gastric cancer microenvironment. J Immunol Res 2022:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2022/6011632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yang P, Zhang X, Xu R, Adeel K, Lu X, Chen M, Shen H, Li Z, Xu Z. 2022. Fungal microbiota dysbiosis and ecological alterations in gastric cancer. Front Microbiol 13:889694. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.889694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. He S, Sun Y, Sun W, Tang M, Meng B, Liu Y, Kong Q, Li Y, Yu J, Li J. 2023. Oral microbiota disorder in GC patients revealed by 2b-RAD-M. J Transl Med 21:831. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04599-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Vitali F, Colucci R, Di Paola M, Pindo M, De Filippo C, Moretti S, Cavalieri D. 2022. Early melanoma invasivity correlates with gut fungal and bacterial profiles. Br J Dermatol 186:106–116. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Banerjee S, Alwine JC, Wei Z, Tian T, Shih N, Sperling C, Guzzo T, Feldman MD, Robertson ES. 2019. Microbiome signatures in prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis 40:749–764. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wang X, Zhou Z, Turner D, Lilly M, Ou T, Jiang W. 2022. Differential circulating fungal microbiome in prostate cancer patients compared to healthy control individuals. J Immunol Res 2022:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2022/2574964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bukavina L, Prunty M, Isali I, Calaway A, Ginwala R, Sindhani M, Ghannoum M, Mishra K, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Ponsky LE, Abbosh PH. 2022. Human gut mycobiome and fungal community interaction: the unknown musketeer in the chemotherapy response status in bladder cancer. Eur Urol Open Sci 43:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Liu Z, Li Y, Li C, Lei G, Zhou L, Chen X, Jia X, Lu Y. 2022. Intestinal Candida albicans promotes hepatocarcinogenesis by up-regulating NLRP6. Front Microbiol 13:812771. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.812771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Zhu F, Willette-Brown J, Song N-Y, Lomada D, Song Y, Xue L, Gray Z, Zhao Z, Davis SR, Sun Z, Zhang P, Wu X, Zhan Q, Richie ER, Hu Y. 2017. Autoreactive T cells and chronic fungal infection drive esophageal carcinogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 21:478–493. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Rautemaa R, Hietanen J, Niissalo S, Pirinen S, Perheentupa J. 2007. Oral and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma--A complication or component of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED, APS-I). Oral Oncol 43:607–613. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Alam A, Levanduski E, Denz P, Villavicencio HS, Bhatta M, Alhorebi L, Zhang Y, Gomez EC, Morreale B, Senchanthisai S, Li J, Turowski SG, Sexton S, Sait SJ, Singh PK, Wang J, Maitra A, Kalinski P, DePinho RA, Wang H, Liao W, Abrams SI, Segal BH, Dey P. 2022. Fungal mycobiome drives IL-33 secretion and type 2 immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 40:153–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. 2021. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Islami F, Marlow EC, Thomson B, McCullough ML, Rumgay H, Gapstur SM, Patel AV, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. 2024. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States, 2019. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 74:405–432. doi: 10.3322/caac.21858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Huang Y, Zhu M, Ji M, Fan J, Xie J, Wei X, Jiang X, Xu J, Chen L, Yin R, Wang Y, Dai J, Jin G, Xu L, Hu Z, Ma H, Shen H. 2021. Air pollution, genetic factors, and the risk of lung cancer: a prospective study in the UK biobank. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 204:817–825. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202011-4063OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Liu N-N, Yi C-X, Wei L-Q, Zhou J-A, Jiang T, Hu C-C, Wang L, Wang Y-Y, Zou Y, Zhao Y-K, Zhang L-L, Nie Y-T, Zhu Y-J, Yi X-Y, Zeng L-B, Li J-Q, Huang X-T, Ji H-B, Kozlakidis Z, Zhong L, Heeschen C, Zheng X-Q, Chen C, Zhang P, Wang H. 2023. The intratumor mycobiome promotes lung cancer progression via myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Cell 41:1927–1944. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Yan X, Li M, Jiang M, Zou L-Q, Luo F, Jiang Y. 2009. Clinical characteristics of 45 patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: retrospective analysis of 1711 lung cancer cases. Cancer 115:5018–5025. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Park M, Ho DY, Wakelee HA, Neal JW. 2021. Opportunistic invasive fungal infections mimicking progression of non–small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 22:e193–e200. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Rahal Z, Kadara H. 2023. Beyond bacteria: how the intratumor mycobiome modulates lung adenocarcinoma progression. Cancer Cell 41:1846–1848. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. 2009. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 9:162–174. doi: 10.1038/nri2506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Liu Q, Zhang W, Pei Y, Tao H, Ma J, Li R, Zhang F, Wang L, Shen L, Liu Y, Jia X, Hu Y. 2023. Gut mycobiome as a potential non-invasive tool in early detection of lung adenocarcinoma: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med 21:409. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03095-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Marfil-Sánchez A, Seelbinder B, Ni Y, Varga J, Berta J, Hollosi V, Dome B, Megyesfalvi Z, Dulka E, Galffy G, Weiss GJ, Panagiotou G, Lohinai Z. 2021. Gut microbiome functionality might be associated with exercise tolerance and recurrence of resected early-stage lung cancer patients. PLoS ONE 16:e0259898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Fu A, Yao B, Dong T, Chen Y, Yao J, Liu Y, Li H, Bai H, Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang C, Guo Y, Li N, Cai S. 2022. Tumor-resident intracellular microbiota promotes metastatic colonization in breast cancer. Cell 185:1356–1372. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Ahmadi N, Ahmadi A, Kheirali E, Hossein Yadegari M, Bayat M, Shajiei A, Amini AA, Ashrafi S, Abolhassani M, Faezi S, Yazdanparast SA, Mahdavi M. 2019. Systemic infection with Candida albicans in breast tumor bearing mice: cytokines dysregulation and induction of regulatory T cells. J Mycol Med 29:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Aykut B, Pushalkar S, Chen R, Li Q, Abengozar R, Kim JI, Shadaloey SA, Wu D, Preiss P, Verma N, Guo Y, Saxena A, Vardhan M, Diskin B, Wang W, Leinwand J, Kurz E, Kochen Rossi JA, Hundeyin M, Zambrinis C, Li X, Saxena D, Miller G. 2019. The fungal mycobiome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via activation of MBL. Nature New Biol 574:264–267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1608-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Wei A, Zhao H, Cong X, Wang L, Chen Y, Gou J, Hu Z, Hu X, Tian Y, Li K, Deng Y, Zuo H, Fu MR. 2022. Oral mycobiota and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 22:1251. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10329-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Ost KS, Round JL. 2023. Commensal fungi in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:723–734. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00816-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Araghi M, Soerjomataram I, Bardot A, Ferlay J, Cabasag CJ, Morrison DS, De P, Tervonen H, Walsh PM, Bucher O, Engholm G, Jackson C, McClure C, Woods RR, Saint-Jacques N, Morgan E, Ransom D, Thursfield V, Møller B, Leonfellner S, Guren MG, Bray F, Arnold M. 2019. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence in seven high-income countries: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:511–518. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30147-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Chambers AC, Dixon SW, White P, Williams AC, Thomas MG, Messenger DE. 2020. Demographic trends in the incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Br J Surg 107:595–605. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Siegel RL, Torre LA, Soerjomataram I, Hayes RB, Bray F, Weber TK, Jemal A. 2019. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence in young adults. Gut 68:2179–2185. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Wong CC, Yu J. 2023. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 20:429–452. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00766-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Song M, Chan AT, Sun J. 2020. Influence of the gut microbiome, diet, and environment on risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 158:322–340. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Sivignon A, de Vallée A, Barnich N, Denizot J, Darcha C, Pignède G, Vandekerckove P, Darfeuille-Michaud A. 2015. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 prevents colitis induced by AIEC bacteria in the transgenic mouse model mimicking Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21:276–286. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Wang Y, Ren Y, Huang Y, Yu X, Yang Y, Wang D, Shi L, Tao K, Wang G, Wu K. 2021. Fungal dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is associated with colorectal cancer in Chinese patients. Am J Transl Res 13:11287–11301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Harjunpää H, Llort Asens M, Guenther C, Fagerholm SC. 2019. Cell adhesion molecules and their roles and regulation in the immune and tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol 10:1078. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Drummond RA, Franco LM, Lionakis MS. 2018. Human CARD9: a critical molecule of fungal immune surveillance. Front Immunol 9:1836. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Zhang Z, Chen Y, Yin Y, Chen Y, Chen Q, Bing Z, Zheng Y, Hou Y, Shen S, Chen Y, Wang T. 2022. Candida tropicalis induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation via glycogen metabolism-dependent glycolysis and JAK-STAT1 signaling pathway in myeloid-derived suppressor cells to promote colorectal carcinogenesis. Int Immunopharmacol 113:109430. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Qu J, Sun Z, Peng C, Li D, Yan W, Xu Z, Hou Y, Shen S, Chen P, Wang T. 2021. C. tropicalis promotes chemotherapy resistance in colon cancer through increasing lactate production to regulate the mismatch repair system. Int J Biol Sci 17:2756–2769. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.59262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Peleg AY, Hogan DA, Mylonakis E. 2010. Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:340–349. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Seelbinder B, Lohinai Z, Vazquez-Uribe R, Brunke S, Chen X, Mirhakkak M, Lopez-Escalera S, Dome B, Megyesfalvi Z, Berta J, Galffy G, Dulka E, Wellejus A, Weiss GJ, Bauer M, Hube B, Sommer MOA, Panagiotou G. 2023. Candida expansion in the gut of lung cancer patients associates with an ecological signature that supports growth under dysbiotic conditions. Nat Commun 14:2673. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38058-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Hager CL, Ghannoum MA. 2017. The mycobiome: role in health and disease, and as a potential probiotic target in gastrointestinal disease. Dig Liver Dis 49:1171–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Sovran B, Planchais J, Jegou S, Straube M, Lamas B, Natividad JM, Agus A, Dupraz L, Glodt J, Da Costa G, Michel M-L, Langella P, Richard ML, Sokol H. 2018. Enterobacteriaceae are essential for the modulation of colitis severity by fungi. Microbiome 6:152. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0538-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Hager CL, Isham N, Schrom KP, Chandra J, McCormick T, Miyagi M, Ghannoum MA. 2019. Effects of a novel probiotic combination on pathogenic bacterial-fungal polymicrobial biofilms. MBio 10:e00338-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00338-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Allison DL, Willems HME, Jayatilake J, Bruno VM, Peters BM, Shirtliff ME. 2016. Candida–bacteria interactions: their impact on human diseas. Microbiol Spectr 4:4. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0030-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Singh N, Dev I, Pal S, Yadav SK, Idris MM, Ansari KM. 2022. Transcriptomic and proteomic insights into patulin mycotoxin-induced cancer-like phenotypes in normal intestinal epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem 477:1405–1416. doi: 10.1007/s11010-022-04387-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Zhang R, Li H, Li N, Shi J-F, Li J, Chen H-D, Yu Y-W, Qin C, Ren J-S, Chen W-Q, He J. 2021. Risk factors for gastric cancer: a large-scale, population-based case-control study. Chin Med J (Engl) 134:1952–1958. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Zhong M, Xiong Y, Zhao J, Gao Z, Ma J, Wu Z, Song Y, Hong X. 2021. Candida albicans disorder is associated with gastric carcinogenesis. Theranostics 11:4945–4956. doi: 10.7150/thno.55209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Zhang Z, Qiu Y, Feng H, Huang D, Weng B, Xu Z, Xie Q, Wang Z, Ding W, Li G, Liu H. 2022. Identification of Malassezia globosa as a gastric fungus associated with PD-L1 expression and overall survival of patients with gastric cancer. J Immunol Res 2022:2430759. doi: 10.1155/2022/2430759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Propper DJ, Balkwill FR. 2022. Harnessing cytokines and chemokines for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19:237–253. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00588-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Zhang L, Chen C, Chai D, Li C, Qiu Z, Kuang T, Liu L, Deng W, Wang W. 2023. Characterization of the intestinal fungal microbiome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med 21:126. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-03940-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Johnson WW, Guengerich FP. 1997. Reaction of aflatoxin B1 exo-8,9-epoxide with DNA: kinetic analysis of covalent binding and DNA-induced hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:6121–6125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Powell AM, Nyirjesy P. 2014. Recurrent vulvovaginitis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 28:967–976. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sobel JD. 1989. Pathogenesis of Candida vulvovaginitis, p 86–108. In McGinnis MR, Borgers M (ed), Current Topics in Medical Mycology. Springer New York, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Boris S, Barbés C. 2000. Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microbes Infect 2:543–546. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00313-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. 2013. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence 4:119–128. doi: 10.4161/viru.22913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Niu X-X, Li T, Zhang X, Wang S-X, Liu Z-H. 2017. Lactobacillus crispatus modulates vaginal epithelial cell innate response to Candida albicans. Chin Med J 130:273–279. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.198927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Kalia N, Singh J, Kaur M. 2020. Microbiota in vaginal health and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal infections: a critical review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 19:5. doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-0347-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Liu B, Xia X, Zhu F, Park E, Carbajal S, Kiguchi K, DiGiovanni J, Fischer SM, Hu Y. 2008. IKKα is required to maintain skin homeostasis and prevent skin cancer. Cancer Cell 14:212–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.07.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Human Microbiome Project Consortium . 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Roy S, Ray D, Laha I, Choudhury L. 2024. Human mycobiota and its role in cancer progression, diagnostics and therapeutics: a link lesser-known. Cancer Invest 42:44–62. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2024.2301733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Huët MAL, Lee CZ, Rahman S. 2022. A review on association of fungi with the development and progression of carcinogenesis in the human body. Curr Res Microb Sci 3:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka K, Dvořák A, Folwarski M, Daca A, Przewłócka K, Makarewicz W. 2020. Fungal gut microbiota dysbiosis and its role in colorectal, oral, and pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 12:1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Gainza-Cirauqui ML, Nieminen MT, Novak Frazer L, Aguirre-Urizar JM, Moragues MD, Rautemaa R. 2013. Production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde by Candida albicans from patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders. J Oral Pathol Med 42:243–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2012.01203.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Nieminen MT, Salaspuro M. 2018. Local acetaldehyde—an essential role in alcohol-related upper gastrointestinal tract carcinogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 10:11. doi: 10.3390/cancers10010011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024. n.d. https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/report-of-the-advisory-group-to-recommend-priorities-for-the-iarc-monographs-during-2020-2024/.
  • 111. Homann N, Tillonen J, Meurman JH, Rintamäki H, Lindqvist C, Rautio M, Jousimies-Somer H, Salaspuro M. 2000. Increased salivary acetaldehyde levels in heavy drinkers and smokers: a microbiological approach to oral cavity cancer. Carcinogenesis 21:663–668. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.4.663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Uittamo J, Siikala E, Kaihovaara P, Salaspuro M, Rautemaa R. 2009. Chronic candidosis and oral cancer in APECED‐patients: production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde from glucose and ethanol by Candida albicans. Intl Journal of Cancer 124:754–756. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Tillonen J, Homann N, Rautio M, Jousimies‐Somer H, Salaspuro M. 1999. Role of yeasts in the salivary acetaldehyde production from ethanol among risk groups for ethanol‐associated oral cavity cancer. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res 23:1409–1411. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04364.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Sankari SL, Gayathri K, Balachander N, Malathi L. 2015. Candida in potentially malignant oral disorders. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 7:S162–S164. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. O’Grady JF, Reade PC. 1992. Candida albicans as a promoter of oral mucosal neoplasia. Carcinogenesis 13:783–786. doi: 10.1093/carcin/13.5.783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Scully C. 2009. Oral cancer aetiopathogenesis; past, present and future aspects. Med Oral:e306–e311. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Mohamed N, Litlekalsøy J, Ahmed IA, Martinsen EMH, Furriol J, Javier-Lopez R, Elsheikh M, Gaafar NM, Morgado L, Mundra S, Johannessen AC, Osman T-H, Nginamau ES, Suleiman A, Costea DE. 2021. Analysis of salivary mycobiome in a cohort of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients from sudan identifies higher salivary carriage of Malassezia as an independent and favorable predictor of overall survival. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:673465. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.673465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Vadovics M, Ho J, Igaz N, Alföldi R, Rakk D, Veres É, Szücs B, Horváth M, Tóth R, Szücs A, et al. 2022. Candida albicans enhances the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. MBio 13:e03144–21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03144-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Wang X, Wu S, Wu W, Zhang W, Li L, Liu Q, Yan Z. 2023. Candida albicans promotes oral cancer via IL-17A/IL-17RA-macrophage axis. MBio 14:e0044723. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00447-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Jo J-H, Kennedy EA, Kong HH. 2017. Topographical and physiological differences of the skin mycobiome in health and disease. Virulence 8:324–333. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1249093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Shiao SL, Kershaw KM, Limon JJ, You S, Yoon J, Ko EY, Guarnerio J, Potdar AA, McGovern DPB, Bose S, Dar TB, Noe P, Lee J, Kubota Y, Maymi VI, Davis MJ, Henson RM, Choi RY, Yang W, Tang J, Gargus M, Prince AD, Zumsteg ZS, Underhill DM. 2021. Commensal bacteria and fungi differentially regulate tumor responses to radiation therapy. Cancer Cell 39:1202–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Steiman R, Seigle-Murandi F, Sage L, Krivobok S. 1989. Production of patulin by Micromycetes. Mycopathologia 105:129–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00437244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Prieta J, Moreno MA, Bayo J, Díaz S, Suárez G, Domínguez L, Canela R, Sanchis V. 1993. Determination of patulin by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with extraction by diphasic dialysis. Analyst 118:171–173. doi: 10.1039/an9931800171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. 2013. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1–e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Alves I, Oliveira NG, Laires A, Rodrigues AS, Rueff J. 2000. Induction of micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations by the mycotoxin patulin in mammalian cells: role of ascorbic acid as a modulator of patulin clastogenicity. Mutagenesis 15:229–234. doi: 10.1093/mutage/15.3.229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Barhoumi R, Burghardt RC. 1996. Kinetic analysis of the chronology of patulin- and gossypol-induced cytotoxicity in vitro. Fundam Appl Toxicol 30:290–297. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.0067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Liu B-H, Wu T-S, Yu F-Y, Su C-C. 2007. Induction of oxidative stress response by the mycotoxin patulin in mammalian cells. Toxicol Sci 95:340–347. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Saxena N, Ansari KM, Kumar R, Chaudhari BP, Dwivedi PD, Das M. 2011. Role of mitogen activated protein kinases in skin tumorigenicity of patulin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 257:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. 2024. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 74:12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Candoni A, Farina F, Perruccio K, Di Blasi R, Criscuolo M, Cattaneo C, Delia M, Zannier ME, Dragonetti G, Fanci R, Martino B, Del Principe MI, Fianchi L, Vianelli N, Chierichini A, Garzia M, Petruzzellis G, Nadali G, Verga L, Busca A, Pagano L. 2020. Impact of invasive aspergillosis occurring during first induction therapy on outcome of acute myeloid leukaemia (SEIFEM-12B study). Mycoses 63:1094–1100. doi: 10.1111/myc.13147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Muta T. 2006. Molecular basis for invertebrate innate immune recognition of (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern. Curr Pharm Des 12:4155–4161. doi: 10.2174/138161206778743529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Zhang M, Yan L, Kim JA. 2015. Modulating mammary tumor growth, metastasis and immunosuppression by siRNA-induced MIF reduction in tumor microenvironment. Cancer Gene Ther 22:463–474. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2015.42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Zhang M, Kim JA, Huang AY-C. 2018. Optimizing tumor microenvironment for cancer immunotherapy: β-glucan-based nanoparticles. Front Immunol 9:341. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Liu M, Luo F, Ding C, Albeituni S, Hu X, Ma Y, Cai Y, McNally L, Sanders MA, Jain D, Kloecker G, Bousamra M 2nd, Zhang H, Higashi RM, Lane AN, Fan TW-M, Yan J. 2015. Dectin-1 activation by a natural product β-glucan converts immunosuppressive mcrophages into an M1-like phenotype. J Immunol 195:5055–5065. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Wang W-J, Wu Y-S, Chen S, Liu C-F, Chen S-N. 2015. Mushroom β-glucan may immunomodulate the tumor-associated macrophages in the lewis lung carcinoma. Biomed Res Int 2015:604385. doi: 10.1155/2015/604385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Yoon TJ, Kim TJ, Lee H, Shin KS, Yun YP, Moon WK, Kim DW, Lee KH. 2008. Anti-tumor metastatic activity of β-glucan purified from mutated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int Immunopharmacol 8:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2007.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Vetvicka V, Vetvickova J. 2015. Glucan Supplementation Has Strong Anti-melanoma Effects: Role of NK Cells. ANTICANCER RESEARCH. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Geller AE, Shrestha R, Woeste MR, Guo H, Hu X, Ding C, Andreeva K, Chariker JH, Zhou M, Tieri D, Watson CT, Mitchell RA, Zhang H-G, Li Y, Martin Ii RCG, Rouchka EC, Yan J. 2022. The induction of peripheral trained immunity in the pancreas incites anti-tumor activity to control pancreatic cancer progression. Nat Commun 13:759. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28407-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Demir G, Klein HO, Mandel-Molinas N, Tuzuner N. 2007. Beta glucan induces proliferation and activation of monocytes in peripheral blood of patients with advanced breast cancer. Int Immunopharmacol 7:113–116. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Fraser K, Ottoson N, Qiu X, Chan AS, Jonas A, Kangas T, Graff J, Bose N. 2015. Imprime PGG, an innate immunomodulator for cancer immunotherapy has the potential to modulate macrophages in the tumor and the spleen to an anti-tumor M1-like phenotype. j immunotherapy cancer 3:2051–1426 doi: 10.1186/2051-1426-3-S2-P404 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Chan ASH, Jonas AB, Qiu X, Ottoson NR, Walsh RM, Gorden KB, Harrison B, Maimonis PJ, Leonardo SM, Ertelt KE, Danielson ME, Michel KS, Nelson M, Graff JR, Patchen ML, Bose N. 2016. Imprime PGG-mediated anti-cancer immune activation requires immune complex formation. PLoS ONE 11:e0165909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Moyes DL, Wilson D, Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Tang SX, Wernecke J, Höfs S, Gratacap RL, Robbins J, Runglall M, et al. 2016. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532:64–68. doi: 10.1038/nature17625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Richardson JP, Brown R, Kichik N, Lee S, Priest E, Mogavero S, Maufrais C, Wickramasinghe DN, Tsavou A, Kotowicz NK, Hepworth OW, Gallego-Cortés A, Ponde NO, Ho J, Moyes DL, Wilson D, D’Enfert C, Hube B, Naglik JR. 2022. Candidalysins are a new family of cytolytic fungal peptide toxins. MBio 13:e0351021. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03510-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Kasper L, König A, Koenig P-A, Gresnigt MS, Westman J, Drummond RA, Lionakis MS, Groß O, Ruland J, Naglik JR, Hube B. 2018. The fungal peptide toxin Candidalysin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and causes cytolysis in mononuclear phagocytes. Nat Commun 9:4260. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06607-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Ho J, Yang X, Nikou S-A, Kichik N, Donkin A, Ponde NO, Richardson JP, Gratacap RL, Archambault LS, Zwirner CP, Murciano C, Henley-Smith R, Thavaraj S, Tynan CJ, Gaffen SL, Hube B, Wheeler RT, Moyes DL, Naglik JR. 2019. Candidalysin activates innate epithelial immune responses via epidermal growth factor receptor. Nat Commun 10:2297. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09915-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Wang X, Zhao W, Zhang W, Wu S, Yan Z. 2022. Candida albicans induces upregulation of programmed death ligand 1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathology Medicine 51:444–453. doi: 10.1111/jop.13298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Shamekhi S, Lotfi H, Abdolalizadeh J, Bonabi E, Zarghami N. 2020. An overview of yeast probiotics as cancer biotherapeutics: possible clinical application in colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 22:1227–1239. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02270-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Legesse Bedada T, Feto TK, Awoke KS, Garedew AD, Yifat FT, Birri DJ. 2020. Probiotics for cancer alternative prevention and treatment. Biomed Pharmacother 129:110409. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Konishi H, Isozaki S, Kashima S, Moriichi K, Ichikawa S, Yamamoto K, Yamamura C, Ando K, Ueno N, Akutsu H, Ogawa N, Fujiya M. 2021. Probiotic Aspergillus oryzae produces anti-tumor mediator and exerts anti-tumor effects in pancreatic cancer through the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Sci Rep 11:11070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90707-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Galinari É, Almeida-Lima J, Macedo GR, Mantovani HC, Rocha HAO. 2018. Antioxidant, antiproliferative, and immunostimulatory effects of cell wall α-d-mannan fractions from Kluyveromyces marxianus. Int J Biol Macromol 109:837–846. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Chen X, Kokkotou EG, Mustafa N, Bhaskar KR, Sougioultzis S, O’Brien M, Pothoulakis C, Kelly CP. 2006. Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation both in vitro and in vivo and protects against Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced enteritis. J Biol Chem 281:24449–24454. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605200200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Jimeno A, Hidalgo M. 2006. Pharmacogenomics of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1766:217–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Chen X, Fruehauf J, Goldsmith JD, Xu H, Katchar KK, Koon H-W, Zhao D, Kokkotou EG, Pothoulakis C, Kelly CP. 2009. Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits EGF receptor signaling and intestinal tumor growth in Apcmin mice. Gastroenterology 137:914–923. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Vallianou N, Kounatidis D, Christodoulatos GS, Panagopoulos F, Karampela I, Dalamaga M. 2021. Mycobiome and cancer: what is the evidence? Cancers (Basel) 13:3149. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Hoarau G, Mukherjee PK, Gower-Rousseau C, Hager C, Chandra J, Retuerto MA, Neut C, Vermeire S, Clemente J, Colombel JF, Fujioka H, Poulain D, Sendid B, Ghannoum MA. 2016. Bacteriome and mycobiome interactions underscore microbial dysbiosis in familial Crohn’s disease. MBio 7:e01250-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01250-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Offei B, Vandecruys P, De Graeve S, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM. 2019. Unique genetic basis of the distinct antibiotic potency of high acetic acid production in the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii Genome Res 29:1478–1494. doi: 10.1101/gr.243147.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Huang X, Hu M, Sun T, Li J, Zhou Y, Yan Y, Xuan B, Wang J, Xiong H, Ji L, Zhu X, Tong T, Ning L, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Ding J, Guo Z, Zhang Y, Fang J-Y, Hong J, Chen H. 2023. Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define bacterial-fungal interplay and microbial markers of pan-cancer immunotherapy across cohorts. Cell Host Microbe 31:1930–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Riquelme E, McAllister F. 2021. Bacteria and fungi: the counteracting modulators of immune responses to radiation therapy in cancer. Cancer Cell 39:1173–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Keller NP. 2019. Fungal secondary metabolism: regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:167–180. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0121-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Skellam E. 2019. Strategies for engineering natural product biosynthesis in fungi. Trends Biotechnol 37:416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Wang Y-J, Ma N, Lu Y-F, Dai S-Y, Song X, Li C, Sun Y, Pei Y-H. 2022. Structure elucidation and anti-tumor activities of trichothecenes from endophytic fungus Fusariumsporotrichioides. Biomolecules 12:778. doi: 10.3390/biom12060778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Fan Y, Shi B. 2024. Endophytic fungi from the four staple crops and their secondary metabolites. Int J Mol Sci 25:6057. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. He Q, Zeng Q, Shao Y, Zhou H, Li T, Song F, Liu W. 2020. Anti-cervical cancer activity of secondary metabolites of endophytic fungi from Ginkgo biloba. CBM 28:371–379. doi: 10.3233/CBM-190462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. López-Legarda X, Rostro-Alanis M, Parra-Saldivar R, Villa-Pulgarín JA, Segura-Sánchez F. 2021. Submerged cultivation, characterization and in vitro antitumor activity of polysaccharides from Schizophyllum radiatum. Int J Biol Macromol 186:919–932. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Ikeda Y, Adachi Y, Ishii T, Tamura H, Aketagawa J, Tanaka S, Ohno N. 2007. Blocking effect of anti-dectin-1 antibodies on the anti-tumor activity of 1,3-.BETA.-glucan and the binding of dectin-1 to 1,3-.BETA.-glucan. Biol Pharm Bull 30:1384–1389. doi: 10.1248/bpb.30.1384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Zhong K, Tong L, Liu L, Zhou X, Liu X, Zhang Q, Zhou S. 2015. Immunoregulatory and antitumor activity of schizophyllan under ultrasonic treatment. Int J Biol Macromol 80:302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Sadahiro Y, Hitora Y, Kimura I, Hitora-Imamura N, Onodera R, Motoyama K, Tsukamoto S. 2022. Colletofragarone A2 inhibits cancer cell growth in vivo and leads to the degradation and aggregation of mutant p53. Chem Res Toxicol 35:1598–1603. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Mazloum-Ravasan S, Madadi E, Mohammadi A, Mansoori B, Amini M, Mokhtarzadeh A, Baradaran B, Darvishi F. 2021. Yarrowia lipolytica L-asparaginase inhibits the growth and migration of lung (A549) and breast (MCF7) cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol 170:406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Visser CE, Kuijper EJ, Bartelsman JFWM, Tijssen JGP, Speelman P, Dijkgraaf MGW, Keller JJ. 2013. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 368:407–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Tian H, Wang X, Fang Z, Li L, Wu C, Bi D, Li N, Chen Q, Qin H. 2024. Fecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice: present controversies and future prospects. hLife 2:269–283. doi: 10.1016/j.hlife.2024.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Zuo T, Wong SH, Cheung CP, Lam K, Lui R, Cheung K, Zhang F, Tang W, Ching JYL, Wu JCY, Chan PKS, Sung JJY, Yu J, Chan FKL, Ng SC. 2018. Gut fungal dysbiosis correlates with reduced efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Commun 9:3663. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06103-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Leonardi I, Paramsothy S, Doron I, Semon A, Kaakoush NO, Clemente JC, Faith JJ, Borody TJ, Mitchell HM, Colombel J-F, Kamm MA, Iliev ID. 2020. Fungal trans-kingdom dynamics linked to responsiveness to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) therapy in ulcerative colitis. Cell Host Microbe 27:823–829. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Shams K, Larypoor M, Salimian J. 2021. The immunomodulatory effects of Candida albicans isolated from the normal gastrointestinal microbiome of the elderly on colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 38:140. doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01591-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Qin X, Gu Y, Liu T, Wang C, Zhong W, Wang B, Cao H. 2021. Gut mycobiome: a promising target for colorectal cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer 1875:188489. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Gamal A, Elshaer M, Alabdely M, Kadry A, McCormick TS, Ghannoum M. 2022. The mycobiome: cancer pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Cancers (Basel) 14:2875. doi: 10.3390/cancers14122875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Yunus A, Mokhtar NM, Raja Ali RA, Ahmad Kendong SM, Ahmad HF. 2024. Methods for identification of the opportunistic gut mycobiome from colorectal adenocarcinoma biopsy tissues. MethodsX 12:102623. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Galloway-Peña J, Iliev ID, McAllister F. 2024. Fungi in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 24:295–298. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00665-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Gihawi A, Ge Y, Lu J, Puiu D, Xu A, Cooper CS, Brewer DS, Pertea M, Salzberg SL. 2023. Major data analysis errors invalidate cancer microbiome findings. MBio 14:e0160723. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01607-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Fletcher AA, Kelly MS, Eckhoff AM, Allen PJ. 2023. Revisiting the intrinsic mycobiome in pancreatic cancer. Nature New Biol 620:E1–E6. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06292-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Sepich-Poore GD, McDonald D, Kopylova E, Guccione C, Zhu Q, Austin G, Carpenter C, Fraraccio S, Wandro S, Kosciolek T, Janssen S, Metcalf JL, Song SJ, Kanbar J, Miller-Montgomery S, Heaton R, Mckay R, Patel SP, Swafford AD, Korem T, Knight R. 2024. Robustness of cancer microbiome signals over a broad range of methodological variation. Oncogene 43:1127–1148. doi: 10.1038/s41388-024-02974-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Liao W-W, Asri M, Ebler J, Doerr D, Haukness M, Hickey G, Lu S, Lucas JK, Monlong J, Abel HJ, et al. 2023. A draft human pangenome reference. Nature 617:312–324. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05896-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Nurk S, Koren S, Rhie A, Rautiainen M, Bzikadze AV, Mikheenko A, Vollger MR, Altemose N, Uralsky L, Gershman A, et al. 2022. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376:44–53. doi: 10.1126/science.abj6987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Nejman D, Livyatan I, Fuks G, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Geller LT, Rotter-Maskowitz A, Weiser R, Mallel G, Gigi E, et al. 2020. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science 368:973–980. doi: 10.1126/science.aay9189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews : MMBR are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES