Abstract
Multiple-choice crosses among five geographic strains of the housefly, Musca domestica L., were carried out in equal (10:10) and low-frequency (4:16) ratios. Initially, a low-frequency-male mating advantage was apparent, but further analyses related this minority advantage to a reduction of male mating success during marking by wing clipping. When there are fluctuating differences in the level of sexual vigor between competing male types over replicate trials of a cross, a mating advantage will accrue to the minority type. Even if males from the two competing strains are equally vigorous, such fluctuating differences will occur during sampling of flies. Harming the flies during marking will serve to enhance this effect and make significant departures toward greater mating success of rare males highly likely. This statistical bias in favor of minority males was substantiated in simulations of the Kence-Bryant model of mating success and compared with our results of a minority advantage in the housefly and with published results of a minority advantage in Drosophila. Our evidence, though circumstantial, that an advantage to minority males could have been induced by such an experimental bias suggests that a re-examination of existing data, as well as new experimentation, is necessary to discern whether or not a real rare-male advantage exists.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Childress D., McDonald I. C. Tests for frequency-dependent mating success in the house fly. Behav Genet. 1973 Sep;3(3):217–223. doi: 10.1007/BF01067598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehrman L. Mating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila. Anim Behav. 1966 Apr-Jul;14(2):332–339. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(66)80093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klobutcher L. A. Aging and frequency-dependent mating in Drosophila. Behav Genet. 1977 Jan;7(1):33–36. doi: 10.1007/BF01067175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kojima K. The distribution and comparison of "genetic loads" under heterotic selection and simple frequency-dependent selection in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1971 Jun;2(2):159–173. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(71)90013-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shorey H. H., Bartell R. J. Role of a volatile female sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav. 1970 Feb;18(1):159–164. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(70)90085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiess E. B., Schwer W. A. Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Multiple-choice and single-female tests. Behav Genet. 1978 Mar;8(2):155–168. doi: 10.1007/BF01066872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tardif G. N., Murnik M. R. Frequency-dependent sexual selection among wild-type strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1975 Oct;5(4):373–379. doi: 10.1007/BF01073206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]