Skip to main content
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle logoLink to Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
. 2025 Jul 11;16(4):e70003. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70003

Prediagnosis Insights Into Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Clinical Symptoms and Medication Use

Chunyang Pang 1,2, Wen Cao 3, Jiali Xie 4, Yaojia Li 1,2, Luyi Zhu 1,2, Huan Yu 5, Dongsheng Fan 3, Binbin Deng 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12246794  PMID: 40642867

ABSTRACT

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has a prolonged latency period, though its preclinical characteristics remain poorly understood. This study uses UK Biobank data to explore and compare ALS's pre‐diagnostic features, including symptoms and medication use, aiming to provide insights into the disease's underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Clinical symptoms and medications were identified from self‐reports, hospital records, and death registry data. Propensity score matching was used to match ALS with Alzheimer's disease (ad) and Parkinson's disease (PD), ensuring balance in socioeconomic factors to compare symptoms 0–5 years before diagnosis. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the associations between medication use and the risk of incident ALS and mortality after ALS diagnosis.

Results

A total of 753 ALS cases were observed in 502 417 participants, with an incidence rate of 10.58 per 100 000 person‐years. In the ALS cohort, the male‐to‐female ratio was 2.9, with a median age at onset of 64.61 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 56.80–71.31) and a median survival time post‐diagnosis of 9.08 months (IQR: 3.18–18.98), while females (log‐rank p = 0.038) and individuals with earlier (< 64.61 years) disease onset (log‐rank p < 0.001) had longer survival periods. In the 5 years prior to diagnosis, ALS showed a higher incidence of falls compared to ad (11.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), but a lower incidence than PD (10.7% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001). Additionally, ALS had a lower incidence of depression (4.6% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001), anxiety (3.5% vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001), sleep disorders (1.4% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001), hypotension (3.4% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001), constipation (0.3% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001), and urinary dysfunction (2.2% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001) compared with PD. The use of calcium channel blockers may be a risk factor for incident ALS (adjusted HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.22–2.12, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Pre‐diagnostic presentations of falls are more frequent in ALS than in ad, but less frequent than in PD. However, ALS exhibits fewer psychiatric symptoms and autonomic dysfunction compared with PD. The use of calcium channel blockers may be associated with an increased risk of developing ALS in the future.

Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, medications, prodromal symptoms

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by the progressive degeneration of neurons responsible for controlling voluntary muscle movement [1]. Due to the lack of effective therapeutic interventions, mortality often occurs within 3 years of the onset of symptoms, primarily due to respiratory failure [2]. Although genetics is a major risk factor for ALS [3], it does not fully account for the entire disease burden, as the causes of 85% of sporadic cases remain unclear [4]. A gene‐time‐environment hypothesis of ALS posits that the disease arises from an interplay of genetic predisposition, age‐associated cellular damage, and environmental exposure [5]. However, the complex interactions of multiple factors contributing to ALS and its heterogeneous manifestations make research on non‐genetic factors in ALS challenging [6]. On the other hand, early diagnosis of ALS remains a significant challenge. While ALS is still a relatively rare disease, its prevalence is expected to rise with ageing populations and improved diagnosis methods [7], maintaining a global incidence rate of only 1.68 per 100 000 person‐years [8]. Additionally, research on ALS‐specific early symptoms that can be easily differentiated from those of other neurodegenerative diseases is still insufficient, leading to delayed or missed diagnoses [9].

Research on the preclinical features of the disease may help provide some evidence. As a neurodegenerative disease, ALS is considered to have a prolonged preclinical phase, similar to disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), where symptoms can emerge 15 years earlier [10], and Alzheimer's disease (ad), marked by amyloid plaque build‐up up to 20 years before diagnosis [11]. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that there may be specific pre‐disease features associated with ALS. Prior ALS research predominantly concentrates on the characteristics and treatments of diagnosed ALS patients, mainly through case–control or cross‐sectional studies. There is a lack of research on the preclinical stage of the disease, with limited evidence available, especially for sporadic cases, which constitute the majority of ALS cases [12].

Against this backdrop, we utilized the data from the UK Biobank's registry of over 500 000 individuals to conduct further research on ALS. The UK Biobank is a large‐scale biomedical database and research resource, containing in‐depth genetic and health information from half a million UK participants [13]. Using this valuable resource, our study aimed to explore: (1) the incidence, sociodemographic characteristics, and prognosis of ALS; (2) preclinical features of ALS and how they compare with those of individuals who later develop PD and ad; and (3) prospective analyses identifying clinical medications linked to ALS risk and its progression.

2. Method

2.1. Study Population and ALS Diagnosis

Among the 502 357 participants recruited by the UK Biobank, aged 37–73, from 22 assessment centres across England, Wales, and Scotland between 2006 and 2010 [14], a total of 753 were diagnosed with ALS. Additionally, the study included 55 292 healthy controls, 4809 individuals with PD, and 4445 individuals with ad. Healthy controls were defined based on the absence of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)‐coded diseases. Clinical outcomes were determined over a follow‐up period from 2007 to 2023 using algorithmically defined outcomes (ALS [field ID 42029], ad [field ID 42020], PD [field ID 42032]), derived from encoded data collected during the UK Biobank's initial assessment, hospital admission records, and mortality data, with the algorithm's accuracy validated in a study of 17 000 Biobank participants in England and used in several previous studies [15, 16]. This research was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 108832 and informed consent was obtained from all participants registered in the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/learn‐more‐about‐uk‐biobank/about‐us/ethics).

2.2. Study Design

As depicted in Figure 1, our study focuses on ALS and delves into its sociodemographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and medications. We comprehensively analysed 753 ALS patients, detailing their age, gender, Townsend Deprivation Index (TDI), ethnicity, and education, among other aspects. In our exploration of ALS disease risk, we maintained focus on these 753 patients. For the post‐diagnosis survival analysis, we excluded patients reported only in death registries (n = 57) and those who self‐reported ALS (n = 51), due to potential inaccuracies in diagnosis timing. Patients without a recorded death event by the end of follow‐up were also excluded (n = 139), as their survival time remained indeterminate. Consequently, 506 patients were included in the descriptive analysis and Cox regression for survival post‐diagnosis.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Research design flowchart. AD, Alzheimer's disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System; BMI, body mass index; PD, Parkinson's disease; TDI, Townsend Deprivation Index.

2.3. Clinical Symptoms

The clinical features associated with ad and PD, as used in prior research [17], were thoroughly considered in the study. These include memory problems, sleep disorders, constipation, anxiety, depression, falls, hypotension, urinary dysfunction, and abnormal weight loss. All events were identified from baseline interviews and updated according to ICD‐10 coding up until the end of the follow‐up period (Table S1). The timing of the first occurrence of these events was determined using the corresponding dates in ICD‐10 codes or from the dates when questionnaires were conducted. The clinical features comparisons across ALS, PD, and ad were conducted among matched cohorts after propensity score matching. Matching factors included sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, and TDI with a calliper value of 0.2 times the standard deviation of propensity scores.

2.4. Medications and Covariates

Medications were self‐reported (Field ID: 20003) and classified based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system [18], encompassing all categories of antihypertensive drugs, laxatives, statins, and medications used to treat neurological disorders, including treatments for depression and anxiety conditions (Table S2). Additionally, we further classified the pharmacological mechanisms of the aforementioned drug categories, with the detailed classification listed in Table S3.

Covariates, including age, sex, ethnicity, qualifications, and TDI, were obtained during the initial assessment. Educational attainment was self‐reported and categorized into academic (college or university degree, A‐levels or equivalent, general certificate of secondary education general certificate of secondary education [GCSEs] or equivalent) and vocational (certificate of secondary education [CSEs] or equivalent, national vocational qualification [NVQ] or higher national diploma [HND] or higher national certificate [HNC] or equivalent, other vocational qualifications) education. The TDI was derived from national census data, including information on unemployment, vehicle ownership, household overcrowding, and occupation.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Baseline and clinical characteristics were summarized as median (Interquartile range (IQR)) for continuous variables and as counts (percentages) for categorical variables. In the analysis of prodromal features, the cumulative incidence of each health condition across different time windows before and after ALS onset was used to demonstrate their progression over time. Propensity scores were generated based on covariates (sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, and TDI) and matched using nearest‐neighbour matching with a calliper of 0.2 times the standard deviation to compare the occurrence rates of nine conditions among patients with different diseases. Additionally, the Chi‐squared test was used to compare categorical variables, particularly the occurrence rates of health conditions, in samples with n ≥ 40 and a theoretical frequency (T) ≥ 5. Associations between medications and ALS risk and prognosis were analysed using Cox proportional hazard models. In the time‐to‐death analysis, Kaplan–Meier curves were used to illustrate survival differences among various groups. The follow‐up period commenced from the date of the initial ALS diagnosis until the date of death. The proportional hazards assumptions were examined using Schoenfeld residuals. All analyses were adjusted for sex, age at admission, qualifications, ethnicity, and TDI. Missing covariate data (missing percentage: TDI‐0.12%, Qualifications‐19.00%) were imputed using the multiple imputation method with the ‘mice’ package in R.

All statistical analyses were performed with R software, version 4.2.1. Two‐sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

The initial UK Biobank cohort, consisting of 502 417 participants, featured a diverse ethnic composition: 94.6% were White, 1.6% Black, 2.0% South Asian, with the remainder from other mixed backgrounds. The incidence of ALS in this cohort was 10.58 per 100 000 person‐years of follow‐up: 10.56 in the White cohort, 17.59 in the Black cohort, and 7.14 in the South Asian cohort. Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of 753 ALS patients. Of these, 645 were diagnosed through hospital records, 57 were identified via death registries, and 51 were confirmed through self‐reports. In the ALS cohort, which was predominantly white (93.9%), the patients had a median admission age of 57 years (IQR: 50–63, Birth year: 1937–1969). A significant majority (77.7%) held vocational qualifications, and the cohort displayed a wide range of socio‐economic statuses, as reflected by the median TDI score (−2.17, IQR: −3.68 to 0.36). Furthermore, a notable male predominance was evident in the cohort, with a male‐to‐female ratio of 2.9, and among those diagnosed in hospitals, the median age at onset was 64.61 years (IQR: 56.80–71.31). Additionally, compared with participants without ALS, the ALS cohort showed a higher male‐to‐female ratio, a greater proportion of individuals with vocational qualifications, and an older average age, as elaborated in Table S4.

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics of all included patients with ALS.

Overall ALS (n = 753) Hospitalization (n = 645) Death (n = 57) Self‐report (n = 51) p value
Sex, n (%)
Female 425 (56.4) 366 (56.7) 32 (56.1) 27 (52.9)
Male 328 (43.6) 279 (43.3) 25 (43.9) 24 (47.1) 0.869
Male to female ratio 1.30 1.31 1.28 1.13
Year of birth, n (%) 0.027
1937–1940 95 (12.6) 77 (11.9) 13 (22.8) 5 (9.8)
1940–1950 457 (60.7) 397 (61.6) 34 (59.6) 26 (51.0)
1959–1960 164 (21.8) 136 (21.1) 10 (17.5) 18 (35.3)
1960–1969 37 (4.9) 35 (5.4) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.9)
Age at admission 57.00 (50.00–63.00) 57.00 (50.00–63.00) 56.00 (48.00–63.00) 60.00 (51.50–63.00) 0.668
TDI −2.17 (−3.68–0.36) −2.25 (−3.73–0.28) −1.95 (−3.67–0.35) −1.74 (−3.27–1.45) 0.388
Qualification, n (%) 0.454
Academic 496 (77.7) 432 (78.0) 32 (71.1) 32 (82.1)
Vocational 142 (22.3) 122 (22.0) 13 (28.9) 7 (17.9)
Ethnicity, n (%) 0.673
White 707 (93.9) 605 (93.8) 55 (96.5) 47 (92.2)
Black 20 (2.7) 16 (2.5) 1 (1.8) 3 (5.9)
South Asian 10 (1.3) 10 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Other mix 16 (2.1) 14 (2.2) 1 (1.8) 1 (2.0)
Age at ALS report, years 63.92 (56.09–70.67) 64.61 (56.80–71.31) 66.21 (59.30–72.47) 52.42 (42.77–57.40) < 0.001
Death, n (%) 576 (76.5) 506 (78.4) 57 (100.0) 13 (25.5) < 0.001
Age at death 71.40 (65.70–75.60) 71.10 (65.50–75.50) 73.10 (68.10–76.40) 66.50 (61.20–68.40) 0.004
Survival time, months 7.75 (1.63–18.29) 9.08 (3.18–18.98) 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 43.13 (30.47–72.43) <0.001

Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; TDI, Townsend Deprivation Index.

In the survival analysis, after excluding ALS patients diagnosed outside of hospitals and those with unknown survival times, a total of 506 ALS patients were included in the analysis. As shown in Figure S2, the median survival time post‐diagnosis was 9.08 months (IQR: 3.18–18.98). Regarding survival advantages, female (log‐rank p = 0.038) and those with earlier onset of the disease had longer survival periods (log‐rank p < 0.001). However, no significant differences in survival time were observed across different ages, ethnicities, or TDI scores.

3.2. Clinical Symptoms

The cumulative incidence of various symptoms across different time windows surrounding ALS report is illustrated in a Figure 2: starting 10 years prior to ALS diagnosis, the frequency of symptoms (memory problems, sleep disorders, constipation, anxiety, depression, falls, hypotension, urinary dysfunction, and abnormal weight loss) begins to rise, with a more rapid increase observed around the time of diagnosis. The prevalence of most symptoms in ALS patients was higher than that in healthy controls, including memory problems (1.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.023), depression (19.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.002), sleep disorders (10.4% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), abnormal weight loss (2.4% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), falls (32.0% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.001), urinary dysfunction (4.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.002), and constipation (3.1% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was found in hypotension (9.7% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.058) and anxiety (12.5% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.054).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Cumulative timeline summary of multiple clinical symptoms in patients with ALS. Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Among nearest‐neighbour matching, coarsened exact matching (CEM), exact matching, and optimal matching, the nearest‐neighbour matching model was selected as the optimal approach based on standardized mean differences (SMD < 0.1) and sample size (Table S5). Using propensity score matching (PSM) based on covariates (sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, and TDI), 441 ad patients and 597 PD patients were matched 1:1 with ALS patients. Additionally, using PSM based on covariates (sex, age, imputed qualifications, ethnicity, and imputed TDI), 560 ad patients and 716 PD patients were matched 1:1 with ALS patients. A detailed summary of the matching balance is summarized in Table S5 and Figure S1.

As shown in Figure 3 and Table 2, in the 0–5 years preceding diagnosis, falls were more common in ALS patients compared with those with ad (11.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). However, compared with PD, ALS patients had a lower prevalence of falls (10.7% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001), depression (4.6% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001), anxiety (3.5% vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001), hypotension (3.4% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001), constipation (0.3% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001), urinary dysfunction (2.2% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001), and sleep disorders (1.4% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). PSM performed using sex, age, imputed qualifications, ethnicity, and imputed TDI yielded consistent results.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Prevalence of health conditions in ALS cohorts compared with those with ad and PD within the 0–5 years preceding diagnosis. *Differences were considered significant after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.0056). Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; PD, Parkinson's disease; PSM, propensity score matching.

TABLE 2.

Prevalence of clinical symptoms in ALS cohorts compared with ad and PD within the 0–5 years preceding diagnosis.

Vs. ad Vs. PD
Controls ALS p value Controls ALS p value
PSM performed after deleting missing data
n 441 441 597 597
Fall 12 (3.2) 39 (11.3) < 0.001 169 (28.3) 49 (10.7) < 0.001
Depression 5 (1.3) 18 (4.7) 0.010 153 (25.6) 23 (4.6) < 0.001
Anxiety 7 (1.7) 11 (2.7) 0.455 108 (18.1) 19 (3.5) < 0.001
Memory loss 3 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0.250 5 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0.075
Hypotension 7 (1.6) 15 (3.7) 0.107 182 (30.5) 19 (3.4) < 0.001
Abnormal weight loss 1 (0.2) 4 (0.9) 0.371 11 (1.8) 5 (0.9) 0.219
Constipation 3 (0.7) 2 (0.5) 0.977 29 (4.9) 2 (0.3) < 0.001
Urinary dysfunction 6 (1.4) 10 (2.4) 0.404 52 (8.7) 12 (2.2) < 0.001
Sleep disorders 9 (2.2) 7 (1.6) 0.760 43 (7.2) 8 (1.4) < 0.001
PSM performed after imputing missing data
n 560 560 716 716
Fall 19 (4.0) 56 (13.1) < 0.001 192 (29.5) 63 (11.4) < 0.001
Depression 11 (2.2) 24 (4.9) 0.032 164 (25.2) 31 (5.1) < 0.001
Anxiety 11 (2.2) 24 (4.9) 0.032 129 (19.8) 22 (3.4) < 0.001
Memory loss 9 (1.6) 1 (0.2) 0.026 9 (1.4) 1 (0.1) 0.018
Hypotension 5 (0.9) 19 (3.6) 0.006 184 (28.3) 25 (3.7) < 0.001
Abnormal weight loss 2 (0.4) 5 (0.9) 0.450 17 (2.6) 6 (0.9) 0.022
Constipation 7 (1.3) 4 (0.7) 0.508 25 (3.8) 4 (0.6) < 0.001
Urinary dysfunction 5 (0.9) 13 (2.5) 0.079 64 (9.8) 12 (1.8) < 0.001
Sleep disorders 9 (1.7) 6 (1.1) 0.595 52 (8.0) 9 (1.3) < 0.001

Note: Participants were matched using PSM based on sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, and TDI.

Abbreviations: ad, Alzheimer's disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; PD, Parkinson's disease; PSM, propensity score matching.

Additionally, we conducted a symptom comparison in ALS patients, categorizing them by the timing of disease onset, length of survival period, and sex. We found that early‐onset ALS patients exhibited higher rates of depression (22.0% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.043) and falls (35.5% vs. 28.5%, p = 0.045) compared with those with late‐onset ALS. Furthermore, patients with shorter survival periods were more likely to experience anxiety than those with longer survival periods (15.6% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.023) (Table S6).

3.3. Medication

As shown in Figure 4 and Table 3, calcium channel blockers (HR (95% CI) = 1.69 (1.31–2.17), p < 0.001), antihypercholesterolaemia drugs (HR (95% CI) = 1.36 (1.14–1.64), p = 0.001), and statins (HR (95% CI) = 1.39 (1.15–1.69), p = 0.001) may be risk factors for incident ALS. After adjusting for sex, age, education level, ethnicity, TDI, and body mass index (BMI), calcium channel blockers remained significant (HR (95% CI) = 1.61 (1.22–2.12), p = 0.001).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Associations between medication use and the risk of incident ALS and mortality after ALS diagnosis. The Cox regression analysis was adjusted for sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, TDI, and BMI. Red highlights indicate statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.0013). Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SGLT2, sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; TDI, Townsend Deprivation Index; TDZ, thiazolidinedione.

TABLE 3.

Medications use and incident ALS risk, excluding patients with follow‐up less than 2 years.

Unadjusted Adjusted
Index ALS case/n HR (95% CI) p value ALS case/n HR (95% CI) p value
Antihypertension drugs 630/55530 1.27 (1.07–1.51) 0.005 539/49448 1.18 (0.98–1.42) 0.078
ACE inhibitors 630/55530 1.03 (0.79–1.34) 0.815 539/49448 0.94 (0.70–1.26) 0.674
ARB 630/55530 1.50 (1.08–2.09) 0.017 539/49448 1.19 (0.80–1.78) 0.393
Beta blockers 630/55530 0.98 (0.71–1.35) 0.897 539/49448 0.82 (0.57–1.20) 0.305
Calcium channel blockers 630/55530 1.69 (1.31–2.17) < 0.001* 539/49448 1.61 (1.22–2.12) 0.001*
Diuretics 630/55530 1.34 (1.02–1.75) 0.034 539/49448 1.23 (0.91–1.66) 0.185
Alpha blockers 630/55530 0.71 (0.10–5.08) 0.737 539/49448 0.78 (0.11–5.55) 0.805
Vasodilators 630/55530 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989 539/49448 0 (0‐Inf) 0.990
Renin inhibitors 630/55530 539/49448
Antihypercholesterolaemia drugs 630/55530 1.36 (1.14–1.64) 0.001* 539/49448 1.32 (1.08–1.61) 0.006
Statins 630/55530 1.39 (1.15–1.69) 0.001* 539/49448 1.30 (1.05–1.61) 0.017
Cholesterol absorption inhibitors 630/55530 1.15 (0.81–1.64) 0.435 539/49448 1.27 (0.88–1.83) 0.204
Bile acid sequestrants 630/55530 2.80 (0.39–19.92) 0.303 539/49448 3.21 (0.45–22.80) 0.245
Nicotinic nacid derivatives 630/55530 0 (0‐Inf) 0.985 539/49448 0 (0‐Inf) 0.986
Fibrates 630/55530 0.61 (0.09–4.32) 0.619 539/49448 0.69 (0.10–4.93) 0.714
Antidiabetes drugs 630/55530 0.98 (0.63–1.52) 0.918 539/49448 0.97 (0.60–1.57) 0.887
Stimulation of beta cells 630/55530 1.04 (0.49–2.20) 0.914 539/49448 1.22 (0.58–2.58) 0.598
Alpha glucosidase inhibition 630/55530 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989 539/49448 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989
Alpha amylase inhibition 630/55530 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989 539/49448 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989
SGLT2 inhibition 630/55530 539/49448
Metformin 630/55530 0.93 (0.56–1.52) 0.765 539/49448 0.95 (0.56–1.61) 0.848
TZD 630/55530 0.40 (0.06–2.87) 0.365 539/49448 0.49 (0.07–3.49) 0.476
Insulin 630/55530 1.36 (0.68–2.73) 0.387 539/49448 0.96 (0.40–2.32) 0.933
Anticonstipation drugs 630/55530 1.26 (0.87–1.83) 0.223 539/49448 0.98 (0.63–1.54) 0.946
Stimulant laxatives 630/55530 3.00 (1.34–6.70) 0.007 539/49448 2.36 (0.88–6.30) 0.088
Osmotic laxatives 630/55530 1.63 (0.73–3.65) 0.231 539/49448 0.90 (0.29–2.80) 0.854
Bulk forming laxatives 630/55530 1.38 (0.62–3.07) 0.437 539/49448 1.28 (0.53–3.09) 0.582
Lubricant laxatives 630/55530 2.73 (0.68–10.96) 0.155 539/49448 3.03 (0.75–12.14) 0.118
Prokinetics 630/55530 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989 539/49448 0 (0‐Inf) 0.990
Antidepression drugs 630/55530 1.44 (1.11–1.86) 0.006 539/49448 1.42 (1.07–1.89) 0.015
SSRI 630/55530 1.46 (1.05–2.05) 0.026 539/49448 1.64 (1.16–2.32) 0.005
TCA 630/55530 1.20 (0.75–1.91) 0.451 539/49448 1.01 (0.58–1.74) 0.986
MAOI 630/55530 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989 539/49448 0 (0‐Inf) 0.989
Other antidepressants 630/55530 1.73 (0.95–3.14) 0.071 539/49448 1.50 (0.74–3.01) 0.257
Antianxiety drugs 630/55530 1.15 (0.86–1.55) 0.343 539/49448 1.07 (0.77–1.49) 0.674
Benzodiazepines 630/55530 0.45 (0.06–3.18) 0.422 539/49448 0.50 (0.07–3.58) 0.492
Barbiturates 630/55530 539/49448
Other anxiolytics 630/55530 539/49448

Note: The Cox regression analysis was adjusted for sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, TDI, and BMI. Bold formatting has been applied exclusively to medication categories to denote classifications.

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SGLT2, sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; TDI, Townsend Deprivation Index; TDZ, thiazolidinedione.

*

Significance after Bonferroni corrections, with a corrected threshold of p < 0.0013.

The Cox regression results of medication use and mortality risk after ALS diagnosis are summarized in Figure 4 and Table 4. In the unadjusted model, antidiabetic drugs [HR (95% CI) = 0.57 (0.35–0.91), p = 0.018] and insulin [HR (95% CI) = 0.44 (0.21–0.94), p = 0.034] may be protective factors for prognosis, while bulk‐forming laxatives [HR (95% CI) = 3.49 (1.30–9.38), p = 0.013] and other antidepressants [HR (95% CI) = 2.78 (1.32–5.89), p = 0.007] may be risk factors. After adjusting for sex, age, education level, ethnicity, TDI, and BMI, antidiabetic drugs [HR (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.36–0.94), p = 0.028] and insulin [HR (95% CI) = 0.44 (0.21–0.93), p = 0.033] remained protective, while bulk‐forming laxatives [HR (95% CI) = 3.63 (1.34–9.80), p = 0.011] and other antidepressants [HR (95% CI) = 3.10 (1.46–6.59), p = 0.003] remained risk factors. However, after Bonferroni multiple correction, all of these associations lost significance.

TABLE 4.

Medications use and incident mortality risk after ALS diagnosis.

Unadjusted Adjusted
Index ALS case/n HR (95% CI) p value ALS case/n HR (95% CI) p value
Antihypertension drugs 506/506 0.88 (0.73–1.06) 0.186 506/506 0.85 (0.70–1.03) 0.095
ACE inhibitors 506/506 0.98 (0.74–1.30) 0.885 506/506 0.95 (0.72–1.27) 0.750
ARB 506/506 0.83 (0.57–1.20) 0.314 506/506 0.80 (0.55–1.16) 0.238
Beta blockers 506/506 0.95 (0.68–1.34) 0.777 506/506 0.98 (0.69–1.37) 0.886
Calcium channel blockers 506/506 0.95 (0.72–1.25) 0.694 506/506 0.90 (0.68–1.19) 0.443
Diuretics 506/506 0.84 (0.61–1.15) 0.274 506/506 0.80 (0.57–1.10) 0.169
Alpha blockers 506/506 0.31 (0.04–2.24) 0.247 506/506 0.36 (0.05–2.57) 0.308
Vasodilators 506/506 506/506
Renin inhibitors 506/506 506/506
Antihypercholesterolaemia drugs 506/506 0.90 (0.74–1.10) 0.322 506/506 0.89 (0.73–1.09) 0.255
Statins 506/506 0.89 (0.72–1.10) 0.277 506/506 0.87 (0.70–1.07) 0.193
Cholesterol absorption inhibitors 506/506 0.98 (0.66–1.47) 0.939 506/506 1.00 (0.67–1.51) 0.984
Bile acid sequestrants 506/506 6.26 (0.87–45.06) 0.068 506/506 7.53 (1.03–55.26) 0.047
Nicotinic nacid derivatives 506/506 506/506
Fibrates 506/506 1.14 (0.28–4.58) 0.852 506/506 1.06 (0.26–4.28) 0.936
Antidiabetes drugs 506/506 0.57 (0.35–0.91) 0.018 506/506 0.59 (0.36–0.94) 0.028
Stimulation of beta cells 506/506 1.13 (0.47–2.74) 0.778 506/506 1.26 (0.52–3.07) 0.606
Alpha glucosidase inhibition 506/506 506/506
Alpha amylase inhibition 506/506 506/506
SGLT2 inhibition 506/506 506/506
Metformin 506/506 0.69 (0.40–1.17) 0.165 506/506 0.70 (0.41–1.19) 0.184
TZD 506/506 1.03 (0.15–7.36) 0.974 506/506 0.95 (0.13–6.80) 0.960
Insulin 506/506 0.44 (0.21–0.94) 0.034 506/506 0.44 (0.21–0.93) 0.033
Anticonstipation drugs 506/506 1.28 (0.81–2.00) 0.288 506/506 1.21 (0.77–1.90) 0.411
Stimulant laxatives 506/506 0.89 (0.40–2.00) 0.784 506/506 0.80 (0.35–1.80) 0.585
Osmotic laxatives 506/506 1.31 (0.33–5.26) 0.704 506/506 1.48 (0.36–6.01) 0.587
Bulk forming laxatives 506/506 3.49 (1.30–9.38) 0.013 506/506 3.63 (1.34–9.80) 0.011
Lubricant laxatives 506/506 506/506
Prokinetics 506/506 506/506
Antidepression drugs 506/506 0.89 (0.66–1.19) 0.424 506/506 0.90 (0.67–1.22) 0.510
SSRI 506/506 0.89 (0.60–1.31) 0.552 506/506 0.92 (0.62–1.36) 0.676
TCA 506/506 0.71 (0.44–1.15) 0.164 506/506 0.69 (0.43–1.12) 0.138
MAOI 506/506 506/506
Other antidepressants 506/506 2.78 (1.32–5.89) 0.007 506/506 3.10 (1.46–6.59) 0.003
Antianxiety drugs 506/506 0.89 (0.64–1.22) 0.461 506/506 0.86 (0.62–1.19) 0.364
Benzodiazepines 506/506 0.43 (0.11–1.74) 0.238 506/506 0.43 (0.10–1.77) 0.244
Barbiturates 506/506 506/506
Other anxiolytics 506/506 506/506

Note: The Cox regression analysis was adjusted for sex, age, qualifications, ethnicity, TDI, and BMI. Bold formatting has been applied exclusively to medication categories to denote classifications.

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SGLT2, sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; TDI, Townsend Deprivation Index; TDZ, thiazolidinedione.

4. Discussion

Using data from over 500 000 UK Biobank participants, our study compared ALS during its pre‐diagnostic phase. We observed an ALS incidence of 10.58 per 100 000 person‐years and a marked male predominance (male‐to‐female ratio of 2.9); early‐onset ALS and female gender may confer a survival advantage. Additionally, calcium channel blocker use may be positively associated with ALS. Pre‐diagnostically, falls were more common in ALS than in ad but less frequent than in PD, while psychiatric symptoms and autonomic dysfunction were less pronounced compared with PD.

On the one hand, our study supplements the existing evidence. Globally, a previous systematic review reported ALS incidence rates ranging from 0.26 per 100 000 person‐years in Ecuador to 23.46 per 100 000 person‐years in Japan [19]. While our estimated incidence of 10.58 per 100 000 person‐years falls within this range, it is still relatively high, which may be attributed to the older age distribution and the multiethnic background of this cohort [20]. Additionally, while neuropsychological impairments are not included in the diagnostic criteria for ALS, it is noteworthy that ALS patients may also experience such cognitive and psychological challenges. These may encompass a decline in executive memory functions, a marked increase in apathy and irritability, a noticeable neglect of personal hygiene, alterations in dietary habits, and the emergence of psychological issues such as depression, anxiety, and disrupted sleep patterns [21, 22]. Although these symptoms have the potential to manifest in the early phases of ALS, they are more frequently observed and tend to be more pronounced during the more advanced stages of the disease [23]. Some studies suggest that these psychiatric abnormalities may play a role in the progression of motor deficits and the prognosis of ALS [24]. This aligns with our finding that the use of antidepressants is associated with an increased risk of mortality following an ALS diagnosis. Besides, memory loss in ALS patients was already higher than in normal controls before diagnosis. Considering that approximately 15% of ALS patients meet the diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal dementia [25], as reported in the literature, this suggests a shared aetiology between ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases. However, the specific factors that lead to the distinct progression and differentiation of ALS from other degenerative diseases remain unknown.

On the other hand, this study provides new evidence, particularly in one aspect: exploring the preclinical characteristics of ALS. In the cross‐disorder analysis of symptoms in ALS, PD, and ad, we found that ALS shares many symptoms common to other neurodegenerative diseases, though it lacks distinct, specific manifestations. The most frequent pre‐diagnostic symptom in ALS, compared with ad, was falls; however, falls, psychiatric symptoms, and autonomic dysfunction in ALS were less prominent than in PD. Consequently, general physicians and even specialist neurologists might not initially recognize a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis due to the overlap in disease presentation with other conditions [1]. Additionally, we found that the use of calcium channel blockers prior to diagnosis may be associated with an increased risk of ALS. Calcium ions play a crucial role in various physiological processes, including muscle contraction, nerve signal transmission, blood clotting, and the regulation of enzyme activity [26]. Calcium channel blockers can influence the nervous system by reducing calcium influx into neurons, which may help regulate neurotransmitter release, reduce neuronal excitability, and protect against neurodegeneration [27]. Calcium channel blockers have been studied for their potential neuroprotective effects in conditions like ad and PD [28, 29]. However, our results suggest that calcium channel blockers may be harmful in ALS. Previous studies have indicated that hypertension and antihypertensive drug use are associated with a reduced risk of ALS [30, 31]. This appears to be a contradictory finding, as hypertension and antihypertensive drugs are generally considered to have opposing effects, yet both seem to offer a protective role for ALS. Considering that some studies suggest hypertension may increase ALS risk [32], current population‐based evidence remains conflicting and inconclusive. In animal research, previous studies have observed downregulation of Ca2 + in skeletal muscle mitochondria in ALS mouse models [33] and hyperactive intracellular calcium signaling [34]. However, these studies primarily focus on skeletal muscle and lack exploration of the key pathological site in ALS—the motor neurons. Future animal and clinical studies should focus more on hypertension and antihypertensive drugs to explore their potential impact on ALS.

Our study has limitations. First, ALS diagnoses in the UK Biobank are based on hospital records, death registers, and self‐reports, which may introduce delays, biases, and a skew towards more severe cases. Given the rarity of ALS, managing data for over 500 000 individuals to capture in detail about 700 ALS cases is challenging. Therefore, in the post‐diagnosis ALS analysis, we included only hospital data to ensure greater accuracy. Second, in our cross‐disease comparison of symptom profiles, the differences in the TDI among ALS, ad, and PD within the UK Biobank cohort were relatively small (standardized mean differences before matching < 0.1). This suggests a degree of regional homogeneity within the UK Biobank cohort, which is limited to participants from England, Wales, and Scotland. Therefore, future research using multiregional or international cohorts is needed to further validate our findings. Besides, the UK Biobank does not include genotype and phenotype data, making it difficult to distinguish between familial and sporadic ALS. Third, although the UK Biobank cohort included multiple ethnicities, its predominantly white composition limits the generalizability of our findings. Race is an important factor influencing ALS, as different ethnic groups may have distinct genetic backgrounds. For example, the expansion of the GGGGCC repeat in the C9ORF72 gene, a leading genetic cause of familial ALS, is more commonly found in individuals of European descent, particularly Southern Europeans like Italians and Spaniards [35]. Mutations in the Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene, which encodes superoxide dismutase 1, are also a well‐known cause of familial ALS and are most prevalent in Caucasian populations [36]. Additionally, variations in the Valosin‐containing protein and Optineurin genes have been identified as risk factors for ALS in African populations [37]. Therefore, the lack of race and genotype‐based stratification limits the depth of ALS research. Future studies should incorporate primary care and genetic data for precise ALS diagnosis, differentiate familial from sporadic cases, and expand ethnically diverse cohorts to enhance generalizability.

5. Conclusion

Prediagnostic presentations of falls are more frequent in ALS than in ad, but less frequent than in PD. However, ALS exhibits fewer psychiatric symptoms and autonomic dysfunction compared with PD. The use of calcium channel blockers may be associated with an increased risk of developing ALS in the future.

Author Contributions

Chunyang Pang and Wen Cao contributed to data statistics and writing papers. Jiali Xie, Yaojia Li, Luyi Zhu, and Huan Yu participated in the data organization. Dongsheng Fan and Binbin Deng provided resources and designed the study.

Ethics Statement

UK—the North West Multi‐centre Research Ethics Committee approved the Biobank (Ref: 11/NW/0382), with all participants providing written informed consent to participate in the UK Biobank study. This research was conducted using the UK Biobank resource under Application Number 108832.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Figure S1 Love plot showing the covariate balance before and after matching using nearest‐neighbour matching

Figure S2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 506 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis since diagnosis from hospital

Table S1. Read codes and ICD‐10 codes used to identify health conditions

Table S2. ATC codes to identify treatment

Table S3. Medication classification based on ATC Codes

Table S4. Baseline characteristics of participants with and without ALS

Table S5. Covariate balance before and after matching across four models

Table S6. Prevalence of at least one occurrence during life course in ALS cohorts stratified by onset, survival, and sex.

Pang C., Cao W., Xie J., et al., “Prediagnosis Insights Into Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Clinical Symptoms and Medication Use,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 16, no. 4 (2025): e70003, 10.1002/jcsm.70003.

Funding: The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81901273) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (ZCLY24H0903).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available on the UK Biobank project site and are subject to successful registration and application processes. Further details are available at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/. Our research data are available upon reasonable request. The R code for the statistical analysis of this study is available upon request from Professor Dongsheng Fan and Professor Binbin Deng.

References

  • 1. Feldman E. L., Goutman S. A., Petri S., et al., “Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Lancet (London, England) 400, no. 10360 (2022): 1363–1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Niedermeyer S., Murn M., and Choi P. J., “Respiratory Failure in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Chest 155, no. 2 (2019): 401–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Akçimen F., Lopez E. R., Landers J. E., et al., “Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Translating Genetic Discoveries Into Therapies,” Nature Reviews Genetics 24, no. 9 (2023): 642–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Goutman S. A., Hardiman O., Al‐Chalabi A., et al., “Emerging Insights Into the Complex Genetics and Pathophysiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Lancet Neurology 21, no. 5 (2022): 465–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Al‐Chalabi A. and Hardiman O., “The Epidemiology of ALS: A Conspiracy of Genes, Environment and Time,” Nature Reviews Neurology 9, no. 11 (2013): 617–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Goutman S. A. and Feldman E. L., “Voicing the Need for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Environmental Research,” JAMA Neurology 77, no. 5 (2020): 543–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Arthur K. C., Calvo A., Price T. R., Geiger J. T., Chiò A., and Traynor B. J., “Projected Increase in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis From 2015 to 2040,” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 12408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Marin B., Boumédiene F., Logroscino G., et al., “Variation in Worldwide Incidence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Meta‐Analysis,” International Journal of Epidemiology 46, no. 1 (2017): 57–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gwathmey K. G., Corcia P., McDermott C. J., et al., “Diagnostic Delay in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” European Journal of Neurology 30, no. 9 (2023): 2595–2601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Postuma R. B. and Berg D., “Prodromal Parkinson's Disease: The Decade Past, the Decade to Come,” Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society 34, no. 5 (2019): 665–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Vermunt L., Sikkes S. A. M., van den Hout A., et al., “Duration of Preclinical, Prodromal, and Dementia Stages of Alzheimer's Disease in Relation to Age, Sex, and APOE Genotype,” Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association 15, no. 7 (2019): 888–898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tang B., Wang Y., Jiang X., et al., “Genetic Variation in Targets of Antidiabetic Drugs and Alzheimer Disease Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study,” Neurology 99, no. 7 (2022): e650–e659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sudlow C., Gallacher J., Allen N., et al., “UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age,” PLoS Medicine 12, no. 3 (2015): e1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Palmer L. J., “UK Biobank: Bank on It,” Lancet (London, England) 369, no. 9578 (2007): 1980–1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shi Y., Lin F., Li Y., et al., “Association of Pro‐Inflammatory Diet With Increased Risk of All‐Cause Dementia and Alzheimer's Dementia: A Prospective Study of 166,377 UK Biobank Participants,” BMC Medicine 21, no. 1 (2023): 266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Parra K. L., Alexander G. E., Raichlen D. A., Klimentidis Y. C., and Furlong M. A., “Exposure to Air Pollution and Risk of Incident Dementia in the UK Biobank,” Environmental Research 209 (2022): 112895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nedelec T., Couvy‐Duchesne B., Darves‐Bornoz A., et al., “A Comparison Between Early Presentation of Dementia With Lewy Bodies, Alzheimer's Disease, and Parkinson's Disease: Evidence From Routine Primary Care and UK Biobank Data,” Annals of Neurology 94, no. 2 (2023): 259–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wu Y., Byrne E. M., Zheng Z., et al., “Genome‐Wide Association Study of Medication‐Use and Associated Disease in the UK Biobank,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wolfson C., Gauvin D. E., Ishola F., and Oskoui M., “Global Prevalence and Incidence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review,” Neurology 101, no. 6 (2023): e613–e623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhang M., McKeever P. M., Xi Z., et al., “DNA Methylation Age Acceleration Is Associated With ALS Age of Onset and Survival,” Acta Neuropathologica 139, no. 5 (2020): 943–946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Walhout R., Verstraete E., van den Heuvel M. P., Veldink J. H., and van den Berg L. H., “Patterns of Symptom Development in Patients With Motor Neuron Disease,” Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration 19, no. 1–2 (2018): 21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nicholson K., Murphy A., McDonnell E., et al., “Improving Symptom Management for People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Muscle & Nerve 57, no. 1 (2018): 20–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Crockford C., Newton J., Lonergan K., et al., “ALS‐Specific Cognitive and Behavior Changes Associated With Advancing Disease Stage in ALS,” Neurology 91, no. 15 (2018): e1370–e1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bersano E., Sarnelli M. F., Solara V., et al., “Decline of Cognitive and Behavioral Functions in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Longitudinal Study,” Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration 21, no. 5–6 (2020): 373–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pender N., Pinto‐Grau M., and Hardiman O., “Cognitive and Behavioural Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Current Opinion in Neurology 33, no. 5 (2020): 649–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Terrell K., Choi S., and Choi S., “Calcium's Role and Signaling in Aging Muscle, Cellular Senescence, and Mineral Interactions,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 23 (2023): 17034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Elliott W. J. and Ram C. V., “Calcium Channel Blockers,” Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) 13, no. 9 (2011): 687–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tan Y., Deng Y., and Qing H., “Calcium Channel Blockers and Alzheimer's Disease,” Neural Regeneration Research 7, no. 2 (2012): 137–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lin J., Pang D., Li C., et al., “Calcium Channel Blockers and Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and meta‐Analysis,” Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 17 (2024): 17562864241252713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hu N. and Ji H., “Medications on Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Diabetes, and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Neurological Sciences 43, no. 9 (2022): 5189–5199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Abdel Magid H. S., Topol B., McGuire V., Hinman J. A., Kasarskis E. J., and Nelson L. M., “Cardiovascular Diseases, Medications, and ALS: A Population‐Based Case‐Control Study,” Neuroepidemiology 56, no. 6 (2022): 423–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zhang J., Cao W., Xie J., et al., “Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Insights From a Large‐Scale Prospective Study,” Annals of Neurology 96, no. 4 (2024): 788–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhou J., Li A., Li X., and Yi J., “Dysregulated Mitochondrial Ca2+ and ROS Signaling in Skeletal Muscle of ALS Mouse Model,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 663 (2019): 249–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhou J., Yi J., Fu R., et al., “Hyperactive Intracellular Calcium Signaling Associated With Localized Mitochondrial Defects in Skeletal Muscle of an Animal Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 285, no. 1 (2010): 705–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Brown C. A., Lally C., Kupelian V., and Flanders W. D., “Estimated Prevalence and Incidence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and SOD1 and C9orf72 Genetic Variants,” Neuroepidemiology 55, no. 5 (2021): 342–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zou Z. Y., Zhou Z. R., Che C. H., Liu C. Y., He R. L., and Huang H. P., “Genetic Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 88, no. 7 (2017): 540–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Goldstein O., Nayshool O., Nefussy B., et al., “OPTN 691_692insAG Is a Founder Mutation Causing Recessive ALS and Increased Risk in Heterozygotes,” Neurology 86, no. 5 (2016): 446–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 Love plot showing the covariate balance before and after matching using nearest‐neighbour matching

Figure S2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 506 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis since diagnosis from hospital

Table S1. Read codes and ICD‐10 codes used to identify health conditions

Table S2. ATC codes to identify treatment

Table S3. Medication classification based on ATC Codes

Table S4. Baseline characteristics of participants with and without ALS

Table S5. Covariate balance before and after matching across four models

Table S6. Prevalence of at least one occurrence during life course in ALS cohorts stratified by onset, survival, and sex.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available on the UK Biobank project site and are subject to successful registration and application processes. Further details are available at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/. Our research data are available upon reasonable request. The R code for the statistical analysis of this study is available upon request from Professor Dongsheng Fan and Professor Binbin Deng.


Articles from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES