Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982;329:451–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014313

Effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation on intra-oral mechanoreceptor activity in the cat

R M Cash 1, R W A Linden 1
PMCID: PMC1224790  PMID: 7143256

Abstract

1. Micro-electrode recordings were made from intra-oral mechanoreceptor neurones in the trigeminal ganglion and mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth nerve in the cat.

2. The effect of cervical sympathetic trunk stimulation on the discharge of the mechanoreceptors to a controlled force was observed.

3. Almost half of the mechanoreceptor neurones studied were modulated by sympathetic stimulation. Sympathetic stimulation both decreased the impulse frequency to a controlled force application and raised the threshold in these receptors. The remainder were unaffected by sympathetic stimulation.

4. In previous studies involving recordings from either the trigeminal ganglion or mesencephalic nucleus no spontaneously active slowly adapting intra-oral mechanoreceptors have been observed, yet in peripheral alveolar nerve studies many workers have reported spontaneously discharging neurones. In the present study spontaneous activity has been recorded from intra-oral mechanoreceptors both in the trigeminal ganglion and in the mesencephalic nucleus after cutting the cervical sympathetic trunk. The spontaneous activity could be abolished in all cases but one, by sympathetic stimulation. It is suggested that reported spontaneous activity from intra-oral mechanoreceptors could be due to cutting the peripheral nerve and therefore the sympathetic supply, thus removing an inhibitory influence from the sensory unit. The means by which the sympathetic supply inhibits the sensory unit has not been resolved.

Full text

PDF
463

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALTAMIRANO-ORREGO R., LOEWENSTEIN W. R. Enhancement of activity in a Pacinian corpuscle by sympathomimetic agents. Nature. 1956 Dec 8;178(4545):1292–1293. doi: 10.1038/1781292a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beaudreau D. E., Jerge C. R. Somatotopic representation in the Gasserian ganglion of tactile peripheral fields in the cat. Arch Oral Biol. 1968 Mar;13(3):247–256. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(68)90124-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CALMA I., KIDD G. L. The effect of adrenaline on muscle spindles in cat. Arch Ital Biol. 1962;100:381–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHERNETSKI K. E. SYMPATHETIC ENHANCEMENT OF PERIPHERAL SENSORY INPUT IN THE FROG. J Neurophysiol. 1964 May;27:493–515. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.3.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calof A. L., Jones R. B., Roberts W. J. Sympathetic modulation of mechanoreceptor sensitivity in frog skin. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:481–499. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ELDRED E., SCHNITZLEIN H., BUCHWALD J. Response of muscle spindles to stimulation of the sympathetic trunk. Exp Neurol. 1960 Feb;2:13–25. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(60)90044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwall L., Scott D., Jr Influence of changes in microcirculation on the excitability of the sensory unit in the tooth of the cat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Aug;82(4):555–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb05002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUNT C. C. The effect of sympathetic stimulation on mammalian muscle spindles. J Physiol. 1960 May;151:332–341. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hannam A. G. Receptor fields of periodontal mechanosensitive units in the dog. Arch Oral Biol. 1970 Oct;15(10):971–978. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(70)90092-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hannam A. G. Spontaneous activity in dental mechanosensitive units in the dog. Arch Oral Biol. 1969 Jul;14(7):793–801. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(69)90170-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hannam A. G. The response of periodontal mechanoreceptors in the dog to controlled loading of the teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1969 Jul;14(7):781–791. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(69)90169-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. JERGE C. R. Organization and function of the trigeminal mensencephalic nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 1963 May;26:379–392. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.3.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johansson R. S., Olsson K. A. Microelectrode recordings from human oral mechanoreceptors. Brain Res. 1976 Dec 17;118(2):307–311. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90716-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KERR F. W., LYSAK W. R. SOMATOTOPIC ORGANIZATION OF TRIGEMINAL-GANGLION NEURONES. Arch Neurol. 1964 Dec;11:593–602. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1964.00460240025003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LOEWENSTEIN W. R. Modulation of cutaneous mechanoreceptors by sympathetic stimulation. J Physiol. 1956 Apr 27;132(1):40–60. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Linden R. W. Properties of intraoral mechanoreceptors represented in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth nerve in the cat. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:395–408. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matthews B. H. Nerve endings in mammalian muscle. J Physiol. 1933 Apr 13;78(1):1–53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp002984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matthews B., Robinson P. P. The course of post-ganglionic sympathetic fibres distributed with the trigeminal nerve in the cat. J Physiol. 1980 Jun;303:391–401. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. NESS A. R. The mechanoreceptors of the rabbit mandibular incisor. J Physiol. 1954 Dec 10;126(3):475–493. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nilsson B. Y. Effects of sympathetic stimulation on mechanoreceptors. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972 Jul;85(3):390–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1972.tb05273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. PAINTAL A. S. EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON VERTEBRATE MECHANORECEPTORS. Pharmacol Rev. 1964 Dec;16:341–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. PAINTAL A. S. Facilitation and depression of muscle stretch receptors by repetitive antidromic stimulation, adrenaline and asphyxia. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:252–266. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PICTON D. C. Distortion of the jaws during biting. Arch Oral Biol. 1962 Sep-Oct;7:573–580. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(62)90063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pfaffmann C. Afferent impulses from the teeth due to pressure and noxious stimulation. J Physiol. 1939 Dec 14;97(2):207–219. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pierce J. P., Roberts W. J. Sympathetically induced changes in the responses of guard hair and type II receptors in the cat. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:411–428. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. SUZUKI H. [RESPONSES OF THE MECHANORECEPTORS IN THE PERIODONTAL MEMBRANE TO VIBRATORY STIMULUS ON THE CANINE OF THE CAT]. Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi. 1963 Sep;25:415–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sakada S., Onodera K. On the specificity of spontaneously discharging units in the cat inferior alveolar nerve. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1974 Feb;15(1):7–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schiff J. D. Role of the sympathetic innervation of the pacinian corpuscle. J Gen Physiol. 1974 May;63(5):601–608. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.5.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spray D. C. Characteristics, specificity, and efferent control of frog cutaneous cold receptors. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;237(1):15–38. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tapper D. N. Stimulus-response relationships in the cutaneous slowly-adapting mechanoreceptor in hairy skin of the cat. Exp Neurol. 1965 Dec;13(4):364–385. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(65)90125-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. WAGERS P. W., SMITH C. M. Responses in dental nerves of dogs to tooth stimulation and the effects of systemically administered procaine, lidocaine and morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1960 Sep;130:89–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES