Skip to main content
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica logoLink to Acta Pharmacologica Sinica
. 2025 Mar 11;46(8):2075–2092. doi: 10.1038/s41401-025-01499-6

Epigenetic regulation of iron metabolism and ferroptosis in Parkinson’s disease: Identifying novel epigenetic targets

Xiao-die Gao 1, Jian-e Ding 1, Jun-xia Xie 2,, Hua-min Xu 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12274621  PMID: 40069488

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease, and emerging evidence has shown that iron deposition, ferroptosis and epigenetic modifications are implicated in the pathogenesis of PD. However, the interplay among these factors in PD has not been fully understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the current research progress on iron metabolism, ferroptosis and epigenetic alterations associated with PD. Furthermore, we present new frontiers concerning various epigenetic modifications related to iron metabolism and ferroptosis that might contribute to the pathology of PD. Notably, epigenetic modifications of iron metabolism and ferroptosis as both diagnostic and therapeutic targets in PD have been discussed. This opens new avenues for the regulation of iron homeostasis and ferroptosis in PD from epigenetic perspectives, and provides evidence for their potential implications in the diagnosis and treatment of PD.

graphic file with name 41401_2025_1499_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: epigenetics, Parkinson’s disease, ferroptosis, DNA methylation, histone modifications, miRNA

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common age-related neurodegenerative disease and was first described by James Parkinson [1]. Epidemiological data suggest that PD affects less than 1% of individuals aged 45 ~ 54 years, while it affects up to 5% of those over 85 years [2, 3]. Additionally, the prevalence of PD among males is approximately 1.5 times higher than that of females [4]. As one of the most common movement disorders, the number of patients suffering from PD is anticipated to increase dramatically to over 12 million by 2040 [5, 6], thereby imposing a long-term socioeconomic burden on the healthcare system and society.

The progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and the presence of Lewy bodies (LBs) composed of accumulated α-synuclein (α-syn) are considered typical pathological hallmarks of PD [7]. The main motor symptoms of PD include rigidity, resting tremors, and bradykinesia. Furthermore, studies have identified non-motor symptoms associated with PD, such as apathy, loneliness, anxiety, depression, psychosis, hallucinations, idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and cognitive dysfunction (like dementia) [813] These non-motor features can emerge years prior to a formal diagnostic motor manifestations of PD [11]. Due to the loss of dopaminergic neurons in PD patients, most current therapies focus on relieving of motor symptoms. Currently, the main effective treatments for PD are the dopamine precursor levodopa (L-DOPA) and surgical treatment, which can relieve motor symptoms by increasing dopaminergic neurotransmission or modulating motor circuits [14]. However, no treatment can halt or even slow the progression of PD. Therefore, developing new therapeutic strategies is crucial for the treatment of PD.

The etiology of PD is complex, and its pathogenesis has not been fully clarified [1518]. Genetics and aging are considered the primary contributors to the pathogenesis of this disorder [19]. Additionally, gender [20, 21], traumatic brain injury, emotional stress and smoking are also supposed to be the potential risk factors for PD [22]. In terms of the pathological molecular mechanisms, researchers have focused on the aggregation of α-synuclein (α-syn) [23, 24], neuroinflammation [25], mitochondrial dysfunction [26], imbalance of the intestinal flora [27], oxidative stress (mainly iron) [28], dysfunction of metal ion metabolism [29], and epigenetic modifications [30]. In recent years, emerging evidence has implicated that iron deposits play a critical role in the pathogenesis of PD [31]; furthermore, ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of programmed cell death identified in recent years. Several characteristic pathological changes associated with PD, such as glutathione (GSH) depletion, iron overload, abnormal lipid and mitochondrial metabolism, and increased ROS levels, are similar to those associated with ferroptosis [32]. This information provides an alternative explanation for the occurrence and progression of PD. Therefore, iron deposition and ferroptosis might be potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of PD.

Epigenetic modification is a reversible and heritable change in gene expression without alterations in the DNA sequence. Studies have shown that epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and alterations in microRNA expression are also involved in PD [33]. Notably, the epigenetic regulation of iron metabolism and ferroptosis has also been reported [34]. Therefore, in this review, we briefly introduce recent updates on the involvement of iron metabolism, ferroptosis, and epigenetic alterations in PD. Additionally, we summarize current research progress on various epigenetic modifications related to iron metabolism and ferroptosis that might contribute to the pathology of PD. We propose that epigenetic modifications related to iron metabolism and ferroptosis might be potential therapeutic targets for both the diagnosis and treatment of PD.

Involvement of iron in PD

Iron, the most plentiful metal in the nervous system, plays a substantial role in the normal physiological activities of the brain by participating in various vital processes, including axon myelination, acetylcholine production, and the transmission of the respiratory chain [35, 36]. Transferrin receptor 1 (TFR1), divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), ferritin (FER), and ferroportin (FPN) collaborate to maintain intracellular iron homeostasis [37]. When the iron metabolism of cells is disrupted, accumulated intracellular Fe2+ reacts with H2O2 and undergoes a Fenton reaction to generate OH⋅ and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage the phospholipid bilayer, proteins and nucleic acids. In PD patients, the accumulation of iron could cause a decrease in the number of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc [38, 39]. Some studies have shown that iron is selectively deposited in the SN [40], before the appearance of motor signs [41]. Iron stimulates the aggregation of α-syn in cells, which can be increased by the presence of dopamine and H2O2, thereby promoting oxidative damage [42, 43]. Moreover, concentrations of iron can induce symptoms of PD in mice [44], such as rigidity and freezing of gait, as well as fluctuations in the density of dopamine receptors and the expression of the dopamine transporter (DAT) [45]. Importantly, deferoxamine (DFO), an effective iron chelator was found to alleviate behavioral deficits by down-regulating the expression of α-syn, TFR and DMT1 and protecting dopaminergic neurons in a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced PD mouse model [46]. The iron chelator deferiprone (DFP) has also been shown to attenuate the death of dopaminergic neurons in PD mice [47]. Additionally, DFP and DFO have been shown to significantly improve the motor symptoms of PD patients (phase II clinical trials) [48, 49]. As research deepens, more and more evidence has suggested that iron accumulation plays a critical role in the etiology of PD [50].

Involvement of ferroptosis in PD

Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of programmed cell death identified in recent years [51, 52]. Briefly, when excessive amounts of cellular iron accumulate, redox reactions increase and the membrane integrity is damaged due to the lethal accumulation of lipid peroxides on cellular membranes, ultimately resulting in cell death. This form of regulated cell death is ferroptosis[53]. Cells undergoing ferroptosis generally exhibit increased oxidative stress and a diminished antioxidative capacity, which are often accompanied by abnormalities in mitochondrial structure [54]. These effects can be mitigated by either directly inhibiting lipid peroxidation or depleting iron [55]. Over the past decade, studies have elucidated the pathogenic mechanisms of ferroptosis in multiple diseases, including tumors [56], cardiovascular diseases [57], metabolic diseases [58], kidney injury [59], nervous system diseases [6062] and other diseases [63]. Although the precise mechanisms underlying neuronal ferroptosis have not been fully elucidated, ferroptosis has been implicated in the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in individuals with PD [64]. Several characteristic pathological changes associated with PD resemble those observed in ferroptosis, including GSH depletion, iron overload, abnormal lipid metabolism, altered mitochondrial function, and increased ROS levels [65]. This information provides an alternative explanation for both the onset and progression of PD.

A study revealed that the concentration of α-syn can be increased by ferroptosis in dopaminergic neurons and cause the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in a Drosophila melanogaster model of PD. This process subsequently results in movement disorders and a reduced lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster [66]. Reduced GSH metabolism following oxidative stress in the SN is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and constitutes a pivotal factor in the neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes observed in patients with PD [67, 68]. An increase in GSH synthesis can attenuate the neurotoxicity of α-syn and protect neurons from lipid peroxidation and cell death induced by ferroptosis [66]. Studies have shown that MPP+-treated cells exhibit mitochondrial shrinkage, the downregulation of GPX4 and upregulation of DMT1 and TFR1 [69], which are classic features of ferroptosis. Similarly, a postmortem analysis of brains obtained from PD patients revealed limited binding activity of iron regulatory protein 1 (IRP1) but increased TFR1 expression in the SN. These changes lead to increased neuronal iron uptake and sensitize dopaminergic neurons to iron-induced oxidative damage [70, 71]. Apoptosis-inducing factor mitochondrial 2 (AIF-M2, FSP1) has been identified as a potent negative regulator of ferroptosis. It can catalyze CoQ10 in the cell membrane after myristoylation to restore its antioxidant effect and prevent cell death by reducing lipid peroxide levels [72] (Fig. 1). In contrast, acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 4 (ACSL4) is a key factor required for lipid peroxidation after GPX4 inactivation [73, 74]. Data have revealed the upregulation of ACSL4 along with a significant reduction in FSP1 in PD mice [75, 76]. In addition, knockdown of the ferritin heavy chain 1 gene (Fth1), known as a suppressor of ferroptosis [77], enhanced 6-OHDA-induced mitochondrial damage in PC-12 cells [78]. Conversely, the results of Fth1 overexpression were contradictory, indicating that Fth1 exerts cytoprotective effects in 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity and ferroptosis. These findings provide further evidence that ferroptosis is associated with the pathogenesis of PD.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram illustrating the process of ferroptosis.

Fig. 1

Several classical regulatory pathways for ferroptosis have been identified. ① Free PFUAs enter cells via CD36 and then are esterified into membrane PLs through the catalysis of ACSLs, LPCAT3, and LOXS, resulting in lethality after peroxidation. ②The GSH/GPX4 pathway is considered a canonical axis for controlling ferroptosis. System Xc- participates in cysteine import that is essential for GSH synthesis, which then affects the activity of glutathione peroxidases (GPXs) (mainly GPX4) to inhibit ferroptosis. Additionally, the FSP1-CoQ10-NAD(P)H pathway collaborates with GPX4 to inhibit phospholipid peroxidation and prevent ferroptosis. HSP90 and RSL3 can affect ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4. ③ The regulation of iron metabolism. Fe3+ is taken up by the transferrin receptor on the membrane and then is converted to Fe2+ in endosomes and released from endosomes through DMT1. Intracellular free iron ions can cause the Fenton reaction and mediate mitochondrial damage. The NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy pathway is also responsible for an increase in the intracellular iron level. Fe2+ is then exported via FPN1.④ Ferroptosis can be inhibited by the iron chelators DFO, DFP, DFS, Fer-1, etc. CD36 Cluster Differentiation 36, PUFA Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid, ACSL4 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4, LPCAT Lysophosphatidylcholine Acyltransferase, PL Phospholipid, PL-OOH Phospholipid Hydroperoxide, MUFA Monounsaturated Fatty Acid, γ-GC Gamma-Glutamylcysteine, GSSG Oxidized Glutathione, GSR Glutathione Reductase, CoQ10 Coenzyme Q10, STEAP3 Six-Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of the Prostate, DMT1 Divalent Metal Transporter 1, FPN1 Ferroportin 1, DFO Deferoxamine, DFP Deferiprone, DFS Desferasirox, Fer-1 Ferrostatin‐1.

The tumor suppressor gene TP53 can induce multiple pathological processes, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS overload, abnormal protein aggregation and impaired autophagy, thus contributing to neurodegeneration [7981]. Studies of PD patients and PD animal models have shown significant increases in both the level and activity of TP53. These changes are closely associated with the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons [82, 83]. Interestingly, TP53 also enhances ferroptosis by inhibiting the expression of the SLC7A11 gene, which is an important component of the cystine-glutamate antiporter system Xc-. System-Xc is one of the key antioxidant systems within cells and participates in the import of cysteine, which is essential for GSH synthesis [51, 8486]. Similarly, lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase3 (LPCAT3) [87], mitochondrial voltage dependent anion channels (VDACs) [88], and lipoxygenases (LOXs), which predominantly catalyze the enzymatic peroxidation of esterified polyunsaturated FAs [89, 90] have all been found to induce ferroptosis and exhibit altered expression in individuals with PD [91].

Furthermore, ferroptosis in microglia can also affect PD. For example, in a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived tri-culture system that contains microglia, neurons and astrocytes, microglia exhibit the strongest transcriptional response to iron dysregulation, and neurotoxic substances are released after microglia undergo ferroptosis, which can aggravate the process of PD [92]. In addition, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) of the brain revealed significant iron deposition in the SN of PD patients, accompanied by the infiltration of immune cells [93]. Studies employing machine learning methods, including LASSO regression and SVM models, have established novel hematological diagnostic models comprising 17 ferroptosis-related immune genes for PD. These findings show excellent diagnostic performance and accuracy in multiple PD patients, suggesting that ferroptosis plays an important role in the development of PD [93].

The above results revealed that the factors involved in ferroptosis including intracellular iron accumulation, increased lipid peroxidation, depleted GSH levels, decreased activity of system-Xc, and reduced CoQ10 levels are recognized as pathological hallmarks of PD. These findings further indicate a link between ferroptosis and PD. Importantly, some compounds have been found to exert their therapeutic effects by inhibiting ferroptosis in cellular or animal models of PD. For example, clausen amide [94], quercetin [62], clioquinol [95] and apoferritin [76] have shown potential to reduce MPTP‐induced dopaminergic neuronal injury and alleviate behavioral deficits in animals by inhibiting ferroptosis. Similarly, thonningianin A [96], hinokitiol [97], paeoniflorin [98], Ferrostatin‐1 [99] and α‐Lipoic acid [100] also function as ferroptosis inhibitors to increase cell viability and decrease ROS production in cell models of PD. These results suggest that targeting the ferroptotic pathway holds great potential for the development of therapeutic interventions for PD. However, the molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis, as well as drug toxicity and the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), have limited the application of drugs targeting ferroptosis in the clinical treatment of PD. Notably, phase II clinical trials of the iron chelator DFP and the effects of DFO and desferasirox (DFS) on the treatment of PD patients indicate their potential as therapeutic interventions for PD by targeting ferroptosis [49, 101, 102].

Epigenetics in PD

In 1957, the developmental biologist Conrad H. Waddington first proposed the renowned concept of an epigenetic landscape (based on developmental biology and genetics) that is generally defined as “can produce heritable phenotypic changes without modifying the DNA sequence itself ” [103]. This definition means that identical genomes can produce different gene activity states that are long-lasting but potentially reversible. With the development of research, the content of epigenetics is constantly improving, including DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation, histone modifications (histone methylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, glycosylation, etc.), and non-coding RNA changes (mainly microRNA) [104] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Regulatory mechanism of epigenetics modifications.

Fig. 2

DNA methylation and histone modification play crucial roles in regulating chromatin structure. DNA methylation and histone methylation make the chromatin structure more compact, causing transcriptional repression. On the other hand, histone acetylation promotes an open chromatin structure leading to transcriptional activation; changes in miRNA levels regulate gene expression by affecting mRNA transcription and thus participating in the regulation of cellular activity.

Recently, the role of epigenetics in various diseases has attracted extensive attention from researchers. Although the current research on epigenetics is still very limited, it has been demonstrated that epigenetics is associated with multiple physiological activities including cell development, differentiation, senescence, and metabolism, and is closely associated with various diseases, such as cancer [105], cardiovascular diseases [106, 107], metabolic diseases [108], and neurological diseases. In the nervous system, epigenetics can affect neurogenesis, the brain volume, synaptic plasticity, cognitive function, the stress response, etc., and plays important roles in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [109], PD [33, 110], Huntington’s disease (HD) [111], and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [112, 113]. Epigenetic marks are promising candidates for understanding the etiology of PD because of their ability to mediate genetic and environmental possessions on phenotypes. In this section, we focus on various changes in epigenetic modifications in PD.

DNA methylation in PD

DNA methylation has been one of the most extensively studied epigenetic markers since its discovery following the determination of the DNA double-helix structure by Rollin Hotchkiss in 1948 [114]. The common detection methods are whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), oxidative bisulfite sequencing (oxBS), nanopore sequencing (ONT), and single molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT); the strengths and limitations of these methods differ but chiefly depend on the sequencing sample and purpose [115]. DNA methylation is regulated mainly by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), including DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B. Research has shown that mouse embryos with DNMT1 deactivation or DNMT3A/3B double knockout (KO) exhibit significant growth suppression, leading to lethality in early-gestation (Li et al., 1992, Okano et al., 1999). These DNMTs exhibit differential expression in different brain regions and are involved in age-dependent neurodevelopment [116, 117]. In terms of the modification sites, DNA methylation can be categorized into three types: 4-methylcytosine (4mC), 5-methylcytosine (5mC), and N6-methyladenine (6 mA). Among them, 5mC, the most prevalent form of methylation in eukaryotes, is also the most extensively studied DNA modification pattern. DNA methylation can mediate transcriptional repression and regulate cell division by influencing chromatin structure and dynamics [118]. A typical case of PD is that a reduced methylation level in the promoter region of the α-syn gene (SNCA) has been observed in the SN of PD patients [119, 120], which causes the overexpression of SNCA. This process, in turn, induces the abnormal aggregation of α-syn, which is a neuropathological hallmark of PD.

The ten-eleven translocation 1 (TET1) protein is a 5mC hydroxylase that can initiate the process of DNA demethylation by catalyzing the conversion of 5mC to 5hmC both in vivo and in vitro [121, 122]. It has been shown to be downregulated in PD patients, leading to a significant accumulation of α-syn [123]. The Tet1 gene is regulated by neuronal activity, can upregulate numerous memory-associated genes in nerve cells, and can impair memory under contextual fear conditions [124, 125], and 86 variants have been identified in the Tet1 gene in PD patients, suggesting that DNA methylation plays a crucial role in PD [126].

An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) showed that DNA methylation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of PD patients was different from that of their brothers or twins without PD. Notably, PDE4D and GPR37 were hypermethylated, whereas MAPT and LY86 were significantly hypomethylated in PD patients. These findings indicate an association between alterations in DNA methylation and PD development [127]. Among them, the PDE4D gene encodes phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D), which belongs to the intracellular phosphodiesterase (PDEs) family. These results have shown that the α-syn-induced loss of synaptophysin can be prevented by inhibiting PDE4D activity [128], which is also associated with cognitive impairment [129]. GPR37 is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), also known as a parkin-associated endothelin-receptor-like receptor (Pael receptor), expressed in the hippocampus, SN and other brain regions. A recent study revealed the level of GPR37 was significantly increased in SN and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with sporadic PD and PD mice. In contrast, significant differences in the expression of this gene have not been discovered in AD patients [130]. These findings suggest that inactivation of GPR37 exerts protective effects on dopaminergic neurons in individuals with PD. The hypermethylation of GPR37 may be an environmentally induced change that, in turn, is associated with PD. Lymphocyte antigen 86 (LY86), also known as myeloid differentiation protein 1 (MD-1), is a biomarker for inflammatory diseases, and relevant studies on its role in PD are still in the primary stage, indicating that it may be a potential focus in studies of the development of PD. MAPT, the gene encoding the microtubule-associated protein tau, is a susceptibility gene for idiopathic PD in Caucasian individuals [131]. Mutation of the MAPT gene can lead to various cognitive, behavioral and motor deficits in PD patients [132, 133].

Furthermore, PGC1-α, a major regulator of mitochondrial metabolism that contributes greatly to neuroprotection, has been shown to undergo hypermethylation at its promoter in the SN of PD patients [134]; the FOS gene (related to striatal dopamine levels), COX7B gene (affecting mitochondrial homeostasis), and RNF5 gene (associated with motor function) have all been found to exhibit altered methylation in individuals with PD [135]. Changes in the methylation levels of PARK7 (DJ-1) [136], NPAS2 [137], CYP2E1 [138] and NOS2 [139] have also been observed in PD. However, empirical evidence of the precise changes in the methylation of some crucial genes in PD patients or PD models has not yet been abundantly reported. This finding implies that further investigation is needed to determine whether or to what extent changes in DNA methylation are associated with PD. Further research is needed to understand how changes in DNA methylation contribute to the pathogenesis of PD.

Histone modifications in PD

In eukaryotes, an octamer of histones wraps around the outside of nuclear DNA (1.65 turns of approximately 146 bp), forming nucleosomes-the essential units of chromatin [140]. The exposed N-terminal amino acid residues of histones undergo covalent modifications such as methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation by chromatin modifying enzymes, leading to dynamic histone post-translational modifications (HPTMs) [141, 142]. Crosstalk among these HPTMs plays a crucial role in the establishment of chromatin diversity, and distinct functional outcomes depend on their complex modification patterns. In recent decades, various approaches, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) and mass spectrometry (MS), have been developed to map epigenetic proteins across the genome. Recent studies have identified multiple histone modifications within individual cell profiles concurrently, such as scMulti-CUT&Tag [143], nano-CUT&Tag (nano-CT) [144], MulTI-Tag [145], nanobody-tethered transposition followed by sequencing (NTT-seq) [146], and ultrahigh-throughput CoTarget (uCoTarget, ultra-high throughput Combined TAgmenting enRichment for multiple epiGEneTic proteins in the same cells) [147]. Interestingly, a novel method nanoHiMe-seq has been described to profile histone modifications and DNA methylation simultaneously via ONT [148], although more practical proof is needed. The continuous improvement of these research methodologies is inextricably linked to their crucial roles in the life process. HPTMs can influence chromatin structure and function by modulating interactions between histones and DNA, as well as the interplay between histones to regulate development, cellular differentiation and responsiveness, the biological phenotype, and gene transcription, replication, and repair [149, 150]. Numerous studies have shown that HPTMs can be affected by external environmental factors and physiological states, thus contributing to various disease processes, such as immune system disorders [151], tumors [152], cardiovascular diseases [153], metabolic diseases [154], and neuropsychiatric disorders [155]. Although histone modifications have been poorly studied in PD, it is not arduous to comprehend from the existing results that histone modifications might play a critical role in PD [156]. Here, we briefly review the different histone modifications implicated in the development of PD, especially histone methylation and acetylation, which are extensively studied HPTMs.

Histone acetylation in PD

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) regulate gene activation by adding acetyl groups to N-terminal lysine residues as well as the globular domains of histones [157, 158]. In humans, 18 different HDACs are classified into four classes. Class I enzymes include HDACs 1–3 and 8. Class II HDACs are grouped into two subclasses: Class IIa, comprising HDACs 4, 5, 7, and 9, and Class IIb, with HDACs 6 and 10 as members. Class III is also called SIRT1-7 and Class IV includes only HDAC11 [159]. Among them, Class I has been reported to attenuate the death of dopaminergic neurons in a PD cell model and a mouse model, exhibiting neuroprotective effects [160]. However, they seem to have the opposite functions in AD. The knockdown of HDAC2 or HDAC3 can ameliorate mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) dysfunction in an AD model [161]. Similarly, the overexpression and/or nuclear accumulation of Class IIa HDACs may be detrimental to dopaminergic neurons. For example, in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from PD patients, HDAC4 expression is increased in the nucleus, which could upregulate some genes associated with PD-related cellular phenotypes, such as ER stress, autophagic and lysosomal perturbations, and increased α-synuclein release [162]. Nevertheless, the expression of HDAC4 is beneficial for restoring synaptic plasticity and alleviating cognitive impairment in AD mice [163]. Class IIb, such as HDAC6 has been found to exacerbate the pathological manifestations of AD, and HDAC6 inhibitors improve axonal transport and restore learning and memory in an AD model [164]. However, related research on Class IIb in PD is limited. Silence information regulator 1 (SIRT1) is an NAD-dependent deacetylase protein encoded by the SIRT1 gene (belonging to Class III), and the negative regulatory role of this protein in aging has been extensively reported [165]. Studies have found that in both PD models and PD patients, the level of SIRT1 is reduced in the frontal cortex, which may be associated with neuronal damage [166168]. Resveratrol, a recognized natural SIRT1 activator, has been exploited to treat PD (as an epigenetic agent), and its phase I clinical trials have been completed in patients with AD; however, no clinical trials are evaluating the effects of resveratrol on PD [33, 169]. Similar neuroprotective effects of SIRT1 on several other neurodegenerative disorders have also been observed [170, 171].

In addition, studies have revealed that elevated nuclear α-syn in PD leads to decreased histone H3 acetylation, affecting gene transcription and resulting in cell death. A decrease in H3K9 acetylation along with an increase in H3K14 and H3K18 acetylation were observed in the motor cortex of PD brains [172]. A previous study demonstrated a significant increase in acetylation at histone H2B lysine 15 (H2BK15), H3K9/14, H3K27, H3K56, and H4K12 in PD [173]. In a PD cell model with mitochondrial dysfunction, H3K27, which is widely recognized as an enhancer- specific epigenetic marker, has also been shown to be significantly acetylated [174]. H3K27 genome-wide hyperacetylation has also been detected in PD brains [173]. In contrast, treatment with a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) has shown neuroprotective effects both on 6-OHDA-induced dopaminergic cells and MPTP-induced PD mouse model [175177]. HDACIs significantly attenuate MPTP-induced adverse effects on motor and non-motor symptoms [178]. A recent study revealed that cinnamyl sulfonamide hydroxamate derivatives (NMJ-2 and NMJ-3, novel pan-HDACIs) significantly attenuated MPTP-induced oxidative stress, inflammation and decreased dopamine levels in the striatum, with aggravate motor and non-motor disorders in rats [178]. MC1568, a small molecule inhibitor of Class IIa HDACs, can protect dopaminergic neurons in the SN from 6-OHDA-induced neurodegeneration and microglial activation, decreasing the detrimental effects on movement in rats [156]. Contilisant+Tubastatin A, an inhibitor of HDAC6, has been found to reduce motor defects and ROS levels, and increase ATP production (an indicator of mitochondrial function) in Drosophila and human SH-SY5Y cell models via DJ-1 inactivation (PD model) [179]. These findings indicate that targeting HDACIs may be a rational therapeutic strategy for the development of disease-modifying therapies for PD, but clinical research on HDACIs in PD patients is still very superficial and further exploration is needed.

Histone methylation in PD

Unlike acetylation, histone methylation typically represses transcriptional activity by affecting chromatin structure. A study of α-syn protein pathy in a yeast model revealed a decrease in H3K36me2, which is a characterized histone marker involved in DNA repair [180]. Increased H3K9 methylation has been observed in α-syn transgenic flies and inducible neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y) [181]. Additionally, significant H3K4 methylation at the SNCA promoter in the SN region has been reported in autopsy tissues from PD patients [182]. GSK-J4 (a histone demethylase inhibitor) was found to rescue the loss of dopaminergic neurons and motor defects in 6-OHDA-induced PD rats by increasing H3K4me3 levels [183]. Importantly, our recent results revealed increased methylation of H3K4 and H3K9 in 6-OHDA induced PC12 cells and the SN of a mouse PD model, suggesting that the altered methylation levels of histone H3 have significant research value in PD development. Although discoveries related to histone methylations in regulating the process of PD have been relatively limited, the available evidence suggests that these modifications represent a potential avenue for treating PD.

Histone ubiquitination in PD

Ubiquitination is the process by which ubiquitin is added to proteins through the action of three enzymes: ubiquitin activating enzyme (E1), ubiquitin coupling enzyme (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3) [184]. These modifications lead to proteasome-dependent degradation, which is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological processes, such as cell development, immune response, transcriptional regulation, and apoptosis [184]. It has been reported that histone ubiquitination can induce α-syn degradation in PD. For example, H2AK119 ubiquitination can promote proteasomal degradation to reduce α-syn protein aggregation, thereby preventing the development of PD [185].

MicroRNAs in PD

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of ncRNAs with a length of approximately 22 nucleotides that serve as endogenous regulators of gene expression. MiR-133b is expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons under physiological conditions, but its expression is significantly deficient in the midbrain [186], but increased in the plasma of PD patients [187]. The overexpression of miR-7, miR-153 and miR-155 has been recognized to regulate endogenous α-syn levels in the nervous system [188, 189]. The loss of miR-7 and the inhibition of miR-34b and miR-34c contribute to α-syn upregulation and accumulation as well as the loss of dopaminergic neurons in PD patients [190192]. Moreover, upregulated miR-24, miR-34b and miR-148b, which are considered specific biological markers of PD, have been identified in individuals with PD [193]. The upregulation of hsa-miR-4639–5p and miR-137 have been identified in plasma and neurons by a dual-luciferase assay and a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) system. These upregulated microRNAs can accelerate the neuronal death in PD patients, and the expression of hsa-miR4639-5p is regulated by HDAC11-mediated histone acetylation [194, 195]. MiR-30, miR-485, miR-29, and miR-26 are considered to be specific miRNAs related to PD pathogenesis and have the potential to become diagnostic biomarkers for PD patients [196]. An analysis revealed the significant differential expression of hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-105-5p, hsa-miR-214-3p and hsa-miR-29c-3p in the blood and plasma of PD patients [197, 198]. Furthermore, the abundance of hsa-miR-1260a in oral swabs correlated with disease severity, and olfactory function in PD patients, suggesting that hsa-miR-1260a could be a novel PD-specific miRNA associated with PD progression in the clinic [199]. The level of miR-30e-5p is significantly dependent on nuclear receptor related-1 (Nurr1), a potential susceptibility gene for PD. Studies of mouse models and patients have highlighted the involvement of the Nurr1-miR-30e-5p-NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding domain-like receptor protein 3) axis in inflammation-mediated neurodegeneration in patients with PD [200]. Compared with DNA methylation and HPTMs, the detection of miRNAs is more convenient, leading to miRNAs becoming more powerful candidates for the clinical diagnosis of PD. Although altered expression levels of miRNAs have been confirmed to be associated with the progression of PD, and the combined detection of multiple miRNAs can improve the reliability of the diagnosis in PD patients, more convincing evidence is needed to determine whether miRNAs can be applied as candidate biomarkers in clinical practice.

Epigenetic regulation of ferroptosis in PD

Recently, researchers have become interested in exploring how epigenetics regulate ferroptosis during PD [34], which provides a new avenue for investigating the associations among ferroptosis, epigenetics and PD. In the following sections, we discuss the epigenetic regulation of ferroptosis in PD and the possible mechanisms involved. We focused on the contributions of different epigenetic modifications involved in ferroptosis to PD to address the possible underlying regulatory mechanisms, as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Epigenetic regulation of ferroptosis in PD and the possible mechanisms involved.

Fig. 3

①DNA methylation regulates ferroptosis by inhibiting the expression of SLC7A11 and DPP4. Additionally, DPP4 can affect neuronal activity in individuals with PD by reducing BDNF levels. ② Erastine-induced H3K9ac and H3K27ac can promote ferroptosis by down-regulating GSH. This process can be reversed by NPD1, which has neuroprotective effect. ③ miR-494-3p enhances the process of ferroptosis and exacerbates PD by decreasing the level of REST, which can induce the expression of GSH and exert a neuroprotective effect. ④ miR-214 can induce lipid peroxidation, which is involved in ferroptosis by increasing ACSL4 expression, and is involved in PD by inducing the neurotoxicity of dopaminergic neurons. ⑤ HDAC9 can increase the Fe2+ content, initiating lipid peroxidation and aggravating ferroptosis, and induce the death of dopaminergic neurons and thus participate in PD. ⑥ miR-30-5p can increase the iron content by inhibiting the expression of FPN1, which can be regulated by H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, thus triggering lipid peroxidation and inducing ferroptosis. Additionally, miR-30-5p can also induce PD by damaging dopaminergic neurons. DPP4 Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4, BDNF Brain-Derived Neurotropic Factor, NPD1 Neuroprotectin D1, REST Repressor Element-1 Silencing Transcription Factor, FPN1 Ferroportin 1, SN Substantia Nigra.

Role of DNA methylation in regulating ferroptosis during PD

In mammals, DNA methylation is the most commonly investigated epigenetic mark. Methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) is expressed in the brainstem and thalamus and can interact with DNMTs, thus affecting gene expression and participating in neuronal development [201]. Studies have shown that inhibiting the expression of MECP2 can ameliorate MPTP-induced neurotoxicity in mice by activating NF-E2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) and brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) [202]. Among them, BDNF can exert neuroprotective effects by promoting neuronal differentiation, regeneration and axon growth [203], thus reducing dyskinesia [204]. Interestingly, Mecp2 gene mutations correlate with abnormal iron overload in the caudate nucleus, SN and related gray matter [205], indicating connections among DNA methylation, imbalanced iron metabolism and PD.

Homocysteine (Hcy) is generated through the demethylation of arginine and is associated with neurotransmission, membrane integrity, macromolecular synthesis, and DNA methylation. Hcy can increase the expression of DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b and increase the methylation of the Gpx4 gene, which significantly contributes to a reduction in GPX4 expression. This process exacerbates oxidative stress and promotes ferroptosis [206]. The upregulation of Hcy has been implicated in cognitive impairment in PD patients [207] through the regulation of Gpx4 methylation and accelerates the progression of PD [208]. Ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) is the first discovered compound that can effectively protect cells from ferroptosis by suppressing lipid peroxidation. Fer-1 can inhibit the downregulation of the Gpx4 gene in 6-OHDA-induced PD cell models [209]. Furthermore, a recent study showed that Fer-1 dose-dependently inhibited Hcy-induced total DNA methylation, and ameliorated the decrease in cell viability, apoptosis, intracellular oxidative stress and ferroptosis induced by Hcy [210]. These results indicate that Hcy can aggravate ferroptosis in PD by inducing DNA methylation and that this process can be inhibited by Fer-1, suggesting that DNA methylation may be involved in the pathogenesis of ferroptosis in PD.

Very long-chain fatty acid protein 5 (ELOVL5) and fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1) are involved in the production of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which are vital factors involved in ferroptosis, in most cells. Hypermethylation of the promoter regions of ELOVL5 and FADS1 results in decreased expression of ELOVL5 and FADS1 and eventually leading to cell confrontation to ferroptosis [211]. Among these genes, the FADS gene is associated with bipolar disorder, which has neuropathological manifestations similar to those of PD (the axonal degeneration of monoaminergic neurons) [212, 213]. These findings may provide evidence for the potential associations among FADS gene methylation, ferroptosis and PD.

Furthermore, DNA methylation at specific CpG islands upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS) in the FSP1 promoter negatively regulates the expression of FSP1, thus affecting ferroptosis [214]. Intriguingly, FSP1 may also be a possible target to protect against iron-dependent cell death in PD [215]. Similarly, an analysis of blood-based DNA methylome-wide associations in PD patients revealed that increased methylation levels of the SLC7A11 gene (encoding system Xc-) decrease the expression of system Xc- by inhibiting the transcription of this gene, resulting in reduced cystine absorption and GSH contents [216] and increasing the risk of PD (Fig. 3). SLC7A11 plays a crucial role in regulating system Xc-, which is directly linked to ferroptosis. These findings provide evidence that DNA methylation participates in the pathogenesis of PD by influencing ferroptosis. Moreover, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), also called CD26, is a glutathione suppressor that can promote lipid peroxidation and induce ferroptosis [217, 218]. Studies have shown that DPP4 inhibitors can block the death of dopaminergic neurons in PD patients by increasing BDNF expression (Fig. 3). Some studies have shown that the transcription of DPP4 is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. For example, genotype-dependent methylation of the CpG island in the DPP4 promoter suppresses DPP4 gene expression [219]. H3K27me3 [220] and H3K9ac [221] in the DPP4 promoter can inhibit and promote DPP4 gene transcription, respectively. These findings link DNA methylation and ferroptosis to the progression of PD, suggesting potential combined treatment strategies for PD.

These results indicated that DNA methylation can influence the development of PD by aggravating ferroptosis, such as the methylation of the Gpx4, FSP1, and SLC7A11 genes. In addition, DNA methylation, such as the methylation of the FADS and DPP4 genes, can also serve as a connection between ferroptosis and PD. However, more investigations are needed to fully clarify the complex relationship between the DNA methylation of genes associated with ferroptosis and the development of PD. This analysis includes exploring the temporal dynamics of these methylation changes during disease progression and how they might affect ferroptosis during PD pathogenesis.

Histone modifications and ferroptosis during PD

As one of the intensively studied epigenetic codes, histone modifications influence the activity of dopaminergic neurons in PD through neuroinflammation and oxidative stress [222], which are associated with ferroptosis. Therefore, we explored how histone modifications influence PD through ferroptosis in detail.

Histone methylation and ferroptosis in PD

RSL3, a GPX4 inhibitor, can enhance the binding of Fe2+ to glutamate (E) and aspartate (D) residues in histone tails, affecting the structure of the histone octamer compound. In RSL3-induced ferroptotic cells, the repression of H3K37me3 induced by the histone lysine demethylase KDM6B decreased in a time-dependent manner. Loss of H3K79me3 has also been observed after subsequent treatment with RSL3. These changes play important roles in DNA fragmentation, cellular senescence and transcriptional activity [223], all of which are related to the pathogenesis of PD. RSL3 can enhance rotenone-induced neurotoxicity and damage of dopaminergic neurons [224], which can induce PD; however whether this process is mediated by exacerbating ferroptosis needs further exploration.

Lymphoid-specific helicase (LSH) is a member of the SNF2 family of chromatin remodeling ATPases [225]. Studies have shown that LSH can lead to the significant overexpression of fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2), a rate-limiting enzyme involved in ferroptosis. In the presence of LSH, the level of H3K4me3 (an active chromatin marker) at the FADS2 promoter increased significantly, whereas the level of H3K27me3 (a suppressive chromatin marker) decreased, thus suppressing ferroptosis by decreasing intracellular iron and lipid ROS accumulation [226]. However, FADS2 has been identified as one of the core genes overlapping between ferroptosis and PD [227], suggesting that ferroptosis, histone methylation and PD may be linked through this gene.

SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1 (SETDB1) is a specific methyltransferase of H3K9 and is responsible for transcriptional repression via H3K9me in euchromatin genes, thus participating in various life processes, such as early embryonic development [228]. Knockdown of SETDB1 reduces H3K9me3 levels, accompanied by increase Fe2+ levels and a decrease in GPX4 and Nrf2 levels, leading to cellular lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis [229]. Notably, SETDB1 knockout significantly decreased repressive activities of zinc finger protein 746 (ZNF746) [230]. Overexpression of ZNF746 disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis and energy metabolism, facilitating the death of dopaminergic neurons in PD [231]. These findings suggest that SETDB1 may play a central role in the interplay between histone methylation, ferroptosis and PD.

Additionally, GSK-J4, a novel inhibitor of histone lysine demethylases (KDMs), increased the levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 correspondingly. Treatment with GSK-J4 has been shown to increase TFR1 and FPN1 levels and decrease FER and free labile iron levels in 6-OHDA-treated SH-SY5Y cells [183]. Interestingly, GSK-J4 rescued the 6-OHDA-induced decreases in H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 levels in SH-SY5Y cells, where H3K4me3 is a crucial regulator of FPN1 expression [183]. In addition, GSK-J4 also increased cell viability, decreased 6-OHDA-induced apoptosis, and prevented 6-OHDA-induced motor defects in rats [183]. However, the associations among histone methylation, ferroptosis, and PD are not entirely clear. For example, protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1), is the first protein arginine methyltransferase to be cloned and is most abundant in mammals [225, 232]. Studies have confirmed that both PRMT inhibitors and PRMT1 knockout can reduce the level of asymmetric dimethylation of histone H4 on arginine 3 (H4R3me2a) in ACSL1 promoter regions and even genome-wide, leading to the upregulated expression of ACSL1, a ferroptosis inducer that increases lipid peroxidation [233]. However, increased PRMT1 expression has been observed in the SNpc of MPTP-treated mice, indicating that PRMT1 might also be involved in the pathology of PD [234], which might be distinct from the mechanism related to ferroptosis. Although some findings have provided insights into the interplay between histone methylation, ferroptosis, and PD, further investigations are needed to elucidate the direct impact of histone methylation on PD through the regulation of ferroptosis.

Role of histone acetylation in regulating ferroptosis during PD

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) modulate transcription by removing acetyl groups from the amino acid residues (mainly lysine) of proteins such as histones or transcription factors [235]. Currently, 18 HDAC isoforms have been discovered in humans. Among them, HDAC9 is closely related to neuronal damage [236] (Fig. 3). In SH-SY5Y cells, HDAC9 can regulate the expression of the transcription factors HIF-1 and Sp1 by inducing their deacetylation, thereby increasing the expression of the pro-ferroptotic target gene Tfr1 and decreasing the expression of the anti-ferroptotic target gene Gpx4 simultaneously [237]. Both transcriptional changes contribute to the activation of ferroptosis, which can be prevented by HDAC9 silencing. Intriguingly, HDAC9 is expressed in the nigral dopaminergic neurons of adult PD mice. Inhibition of HDAC9 can promote the growth of neurite in SH-SY5Y cells and protect dopaminergic neurons from MPP+-induced neurotoxicity [238]. These effects may be related to the reduction in HDAC-induced ferroptosis. Elongation of very long-chain fatty acid-4 (ELOVL4) is a member of the elongation of very long-chain fatty acids (ELOVLs) family [239]. A recent study has found that elovanoids (ELVs) (synthesized from precursors produced by ELOVL4) and neuroprotectin D1 (NPD1) can reverse erastin-induced hyperacetylation of H3K27 and H3K9 and then inhibit ferroptosis by interfering with the downregulation of system Xc-, and decreasing cysteine uptake and GSH consumption [240]. Interestingly, ELVs and NPD1 can inhibit apoptosis and maintain the dendritic arbor of surviving dopaminergic neurons, which can limit neuroinflammatory signaling [241] and exert a neuroprotective effect on PD [242, 243] (Fig. 3).

Role of histone ubiquitination in regulating ferroptosis during PD

The classic tumor suppressor gene TP53 regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence [244246]. Histone H2B monoubiquitinated at position 1 (H2Bub1) [247, 248] has been shown to be enriched at TP53 target genes [249, 250]. Recent studies have suggested that the induction of ferroptosis might represent an additional mechanism contributing to the oncosuppressive functions of TP53 [85]. Studies have shown that TP53 can promote ferroptosis by regulating SLC7A11 expression in cells, but delays ferroptosis in PD cells by binding to DPP4 and GPX4 [218, 251, 252]. The relationship between H2Bub1/TP53/ferroptosis may provide a novel avenue for treating PD. Additionally, the loss of the histone deubiquitinase MYSM1 could result in ferroptosis in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) by reducing protein synthesis rates [253], and whether this mechanism has a similar effect on PD may be worth exploring.

Role of histone phosphorylation in regulating ferroptosis during PD

Histone phosphorylation involves the transfer of a phosphate group to an amino acid residue of histone through the actions of protein kinases (PKs) and protein phosphatases (PPs), thus regulating transcriptional events and biological processes [254]. Autophagy is a conserved degradation pathway in which damaged organelles and macromolecules are degraded by lysosomes to meet metabolic needs and renew certain organelles under the regulation of autophagy-related genes [255], such as the Atg5 and Atg7 genes, which contribute to ferroptosis [256]. Nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) is a key regulator of the autophagic degradation of FER and thereby increases the level of free iron [257]. The phosphorylation of histone H3 on serine 10 (p-H3S10) can promote the transcription of the Ncoa4 gene [258], thereby suppressing FER heavy polypeptide 1 (FTH1) and GSH expression and inducing ferroptosis [259]. As an important promoter of ferroptosis [260], the protein expression of NCOA4 is increased in MPP+-induced SH-SY5Y cells, leading to the excessive lipid peroxidation and neuronal death [261]. Therefore, p-H3S10 may participate in PD by regulating the expression of NCOA4 in ferroptosis. Additionally, p-H3S10 is considered as a marker of primary neurogenesis and cellular responses, such as mitosis [262]. It can interact with other HPTMs, such as those involved in acetylation, to regulate gene transcription and is involved in the onset and deterioration of various diseases [263265].

These findings highlight the importance of histone modifications in regulating ferroptosis during PD.

Roles of microRNAs in regulating ferroptosis during PD

MicroRNAs are the most extensively studied noncoding RNAs in epigenetics and play important roles in messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation and post-transcriptional regulation [266, 267]. In patients with PD, several microRNAs, including miR-30, miR-124, miR-29, miR-7, miR-485 and miR-26, are dysregulated [196]. Among them, miR-124 is enriched in the brain and is involved in a series of physiological and pathological changes in the nervous system [268]. The evidence suggests that miR-124 may participate in the progression of PD through multiple pathways, including regulating cell survival, mitochondrial metabolic disorders, and immune dysfunction in the nervous system. A clinical analysis indicates that decreased plasma levels of miR-124 may be recognized as a potential diagnostic biomarker for PD [268]. Moreover, the overexpression of miR-124-3p protects dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc and striatal fibers and counteracts motor behavior symptoms [269]. Interestingly, miR-124-3p can downregulate Fe2+ and lipid peroxidation responses, suggesting that miR-124-3p is a negative regulator of ferroptosis [270]; however, direct evidence for the neuroprotective effect of this regulatory mechanism in patients with PD is still lacking. MiR-30b-5p has been reported to exert inhibitory effects on cell proliferation and invasion [271]. The upregulation of miR-30-5p could cause Fe2+ accumulation by influencing the expression of FPN1 and then induce ferroptosis [272]. Furthermore, the serum miR-30-5p level is increased in PD patients and has the potential to be a biomarker for the early diagnosis and progression of PD [273]. Therefore, a potential research focus may be to determine whether increased serum level of miR-30-5p influences PD by inducing ferroptosis.

Repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST), a neuroprotective molecule under physiological conditions, can activate neuronal proliferation and differentiation in the brain. REST is downregulated in neurological diseases such as depression and dementia, which cause neuronal death [274, 275]. The overexpression of REST significantly alleviates mitochondrial damage and increases the levels of TH, NSE, and GPX4 while decreasing ACSL4 levels in erastin-treated cells [276]. Researchers have discovered that miR-494-3p can bind to the Rest 3′-UTR, leading to a significant downregulation of REST, ROS production, mitochondrial injury, and ferroptosis and ultimately causing the death of neurons in MPTP-induced PD model mice. These processes are notably reversed by Fer-1 [276], suggesting that miR-494-3p may play a role in PD by inhibiting the expression of the Rest gene, which could induce ferroptosis. The suppression of miR-494-3p might represent a potential therapeutic approach for PD therapy, as shown in Fig. 3.

Notably, the level of miR-214 in the serum is increased in the early stage of PD (possibly due to a compensatory response) but tends to decrease with disease progression [277], indicating that miR-214 could serve as a potential biomarker for identifying PD at an early stage. Remarkably, miR-214 was also reported to increase the level of H3K27ac at the promoter regions of the ferroptosis driver genes ACSL4, SLC38A1 and PRKAA2, promoting the accumulation of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) at these promoter regions and leading to transcriptional activation and subsequent induction of ferroptosis [278] (Fig. 3). These results support the relationship between miRNAs and ferroptosis in PD.

Diagnosis and therapy of PD

In recent years, the methods for diagnosing PD and treatment measures for PD have been constantly improved. Owing to the extremely complex genetic architecture of PD, the detection of risk genes for PD via genetic testing for mendelian forms, such as LRRK2 [279], GBA [280], SNCA [281], and several genes related to DNA methylation and ferroptosis, including Tet1, MAPT, PDE4D, GPR37, PARK7(DJ-1), FSP1, and SLC7A11, has become a relatively common testing approach in clinical practice. In addition, imaging techniques, such as structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dopamine transporter-single photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT), fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), transcranial ultrasound, and radiotracer imaging of alpha-synuclein, have also been used in the diagnosis of PD [282]. Among them, structural MRI can be used to evaluate iron deposition in the SN [283]. Imaging techniques have high specificity and sensitivity for atypical parkinsonism, but they generally cannot distinguish the different subtypes of PD. Therefore, these methods must be used in combination with clinical symptoms and other clinical diagnostic criteria, such as the Movement Disorder Society Unified-Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) [284]. Interestingly, with the advancement of high-throughput sequencing and mass spectrometry, the concept and research methods of “omics” have been continuously improved. Recently developed spatial epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic methods, such as spatial, spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq, have been used to dissect epigenetic and transcriptional states in tissues, dynamically [285]. Different phenotypes can subsequently be observed by imaging an organ system [286], suggesting that imaging and epigenomics can be combined for the diagnosis of PD. Moreover, olfactory function has been extensively studied in PD patients using the UPSIT or Sniffin Stick test [287, 288]. Although the specificity of olfactory testing is low, its affordability and easy applicability make it a candidate for the initial clinical workup of screening for PD. In this review, several miRNAs, such as miR-124-3p, miR-30b-5p, miR-419-3p, and miR-214, which are also associated with ferroptosis, could also be identified as clinical biomarkers for the diagnosis of PD.

Currently, no treatment can achieve a cure for PD, but relevant clinical trials are exploring treatments. The common and effective drugs for PD are levodopa dopamine replacement agents, L-DOPA decarboxylase (DDC) inhibitors, dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, and adenosine blockers [289]. Ferroptosis inhibitors (such as DFO, DFP and DFS) and epigenetic drugs (such as HDACIs, resveratrol, GSK-J4, SETDB1, and PRMT1) are considered potential therapeutic candidates, as mentioned above (Table 1). However, considering the toxic side effects, BBB permeability of drugs, the complex interactions between them, and the individual differences among patients, the clinical progress of single-ingredient drugs and compound-ingredient drugs for PD is extremely deliberate. Notably, numerous small molecules or compounds that are currently available can directly target and modulate proteins within ferroptosis-related pathways in patients with PD, including Fer-1, DFO and DFP. Given the heritability and reversibility of epigenetic modifications, drugs directly targeting epigenetics modifications have the potential to regulate pathological processes at the transcriptional level and allow altered genes with normal DNA sequences to experience functional recovery. Furthermore, the widespread use of epigenetics in the nervous system enhances the reliability of combining epigenetic treatments with conventional pharmacological approaches. Epigenetic drugs may increase chromatin accessibility for other therapeutic agents through chromatin decompaction, thereby significantly improving therapeutic efficacy with lower drug dosages. This property not only helps mitigate unwanted side effects but also aids in overcoming acquired drug resistance [290, 291]. Additionally, exercise, a nonpharmacological, holistic and patient-centered therapeutic intervention, has been widely applied to improve motor function in PD patients [292] through interventions, such as aqua‐based training, gait/balance/functional training, supervised slackline training, “Lee Silverman Voice training BIG” (LSVT BIG), and endurance training [293]. However, the effects of exercise, which requires individual modalities, volumes and intensities for different PD patients, are limited. The treatment of PD remains a challenge.

Table 1.

Candidate drugs and their main effects on iron metabolism, ferroptosis, epigenetics, and Parkinson’s disease.

Candidate drugs Effect on iron metabolism /ferroptosis/epigenetics Effect on Parkinson’s disease References
Deferoxamine (DFO) decreases the levels of TFR and DMT1; inhibits ferroptosis alleviates behavioral deficits; decreases the expressions of α-syn; protects dopaminergic neurons [4649]
Deferiprone (DFP) decreases iron deposition; inhibits ferroptosis specially reduces the abnormal iron levels in the SN [4749]
Desferasirox (DFS) decreases iron deposition; inhibits ferroptosis reduces the aggregation of α-syn; ameliorates movement disorders [101, 102]
Clausenamide increases GSH peroxidase activity; alleviates erastin-induced ferroptosis recovers MPTP-impaired gait performance; blocks lipid peroxidation in the midbrain [94]
Quercetin improves mitochondrial dysfunction; inhibits erastin- and RSL3-induced ferroptosis attenuates MPP+-induced cell death; attenuates behavioral disorders; protects dopaminergic neurons [62]
Clioquinol decreases the iron content in the SN; suppresses oxidative stress both in vivo and in vitro improves motor and non-motor deficits after MPTP intoxication [95]
Apoferritin decreases the iron content in the SN and regulates iron transporters; increases the expression of ACSL4 and decreases the expression of FSP1 rescues weight loss and improves motor deficits induced by MPTP; inhibits the MPTP-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons; decreases the number of Iba1-positive microglia in the SN of MPTP-induced mice [76]
Thonningianin A decreases iron accumulation, GSH levels, and lipid peroxidation decreases the aggregation of α-syn [96]
Hinokitiol decreases ROS levels and lipid peroxidation; up-regulates the levels of SLC7A11, GPX4, TFR1 and FPN, and down-regulates the expression of FTH rescues the deficits of locomotion and neurodevelopment [97]
Paeoniflorin reduces lipid ROS accumulation protects against neuronal damage caused by MPP+ [98]
Ferrostatin‐1 suppresses the increases in GSH depletion, ROS levels, and iron contents; up-regulates the GPX4 protein expression. decreases the aggregation of α-syn [99]
α‐Lipoic acid reduces the levels of iron, and ROS; increases the GSH level increases the viability of MPP+ -induced PC12 cells [100]
histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI)
Resveratrol an activator of SIRT-1 inhibits microglial activation; decreases mitochondrial oxidative stress and apoptosis [33, 169171]
NMJ-2/NMJ-3 (cinnamyl sulfonamide hydroxamate derivatives) inhibitors of histone deacetylases improves motor function, cognition and depressive-like symptoms; decreases the levels of oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators in MPTP-treated rats [178]
MC1568 an inhibitor of HDAC5 prevents microglial activation, decreased neurite length in, dopaminergic neurons, and 6-OHDA-induced nigrostriatal neurodegeneration [156]
Contilisant+Tubastatin A an inhibitor of HDAC6 reduces motor defects and ROS levels; improves mitochondrial function [179]
histone demethylase inhibitor
GSK-J4 a potent inhibitor of KDM6A/B and KDM5B/C (the histone demethylase of H3K27me3/me2 and H3K4me3/me2); a possible iron chelator decreases 6-OHDA-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells; rescues the motor deficits in SD rats; suppresses the 6-OHDA-induced increase in ROS production. [183]
SETDB1 an activator of H3K9me; decreases the expression of GPX4 and increases the level of ferrous ion; enhances ferroptosis may affect mitochondrial function by regulating ZNF746 expression and thus participates in the death of dopaminergic neurons in PD [228231]

Conclusion and perspectives

Evidence has gradually emerged regarding the involvement of epigenetics in PD. The imbalance of DNA methylation and miRNA levels have been reported to be effective early diagnostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for PD. As described in our review, the methylation of the Gpx4, FSP1, and SLC7A11 genes may be involved in the process of PD through ferroptosis. The changes in miR-124, miR-30-5p, miR-494-3p and miR-214 could serve as connections between PD and ferroptosis. However, whether these factors induce ferroptosis first or exacerbate PD earlier remains unclear. The mechanisms of these factors in PD and ferroptosis must be explored. A further discussion of the roles of these mechanisms combined with ferroptosis in PD patients is needed.

Compared with changes in DNA methylation and miRNAs, the regulatory mechanisms of histone modifications in PD have been studied more extensively. For example, the increased H3K4me3 level in the FADS2 gene induced by LSH could upregulate the expression of FADS2, and then lead to ferroptosis in PD patients. SETDB1 knockdown could cause ferroptosis by decreasing H3K9me3 levels on the one hand and induce PD by leading to mitochondrial damage on the other hand. GSK-J4 could upregulate the expression of Fpn1 by increasing H3K4me3 levels and then inhibit ferroptosis in PD patients. The inhibition of PRMT could increase H4R3me2 levels in ACSL1 and then induce ferroptosis in PD. As the level of PRMT is decreased in PD mice, the different changes in PRMT may be worthy of exploration. HDAC9 can cause ferroptosis by increasing the expression of Tfr1 and Gpx4. When HDAC9 is inhibited, damage to DA neurons in PD are reduced, suggesting a potential relationship between histone acetylation, ferroptosis, and PD. Furthermore, some studies have shown that the ubiquitination and phosphorylation of histones play important roles in ferroptosis and PD, such as the H2Bub1/TP53/SLC7A11/ferroptosis/PD and p-H3S10/Ncoa4/FTH1/ferroptosis/PD pathways. An increase in H2Bub1 levels could upregulate the expression of the TP53 gene, which could influence ferroptosis in PD patients by adjusting the levels of SLC7A11, DPP4, and GPX4. Similarly, p-H3S10 could upregulate the expression of the Ncoa4 gene and then decrease FTH1expression, causing ferroptosis and accelerating the progression of PD.

Additionally, a novel epigenetic modification—histone lactylation has recently been reported in neurodegenerative diseases [294, 295] and is associated with ferroptosis [296]. In an AD transgenic mouse model (5×FAD), H4K12la increased microglial activation by influencing the positive loop of glycolysis/H4K12la/PKM2, thereby aggravating Aβ aggregation and leading to cognitive impairment in AD model mice [295]. As the substrate for lactation, lactate levels have been found to be abnormally increased in the CSF of patients with late-onset PD. The increased lactate level may lead to apoptosis by activating the AMPK/Akt/mTOR pathway. These changes can be attenuated by inhibiting the expression of hexokinase 2 (a key enzyme involved in glycolysis), thus decreasing lactate production [297]. Remarkably, H3K18la, a common site for H3 histone lactylation modification, has been found to reverse lactate-induced changes, and cause ferroptosis by reducing GPX4 expression [298]. These findings indicate that histone lactylation may be a potential avenue for exploring the connection between ferroptosis and PD. Currently, studies that directly link ferroptosis, epigenetics, and PD are limited. Further studies are needed to establish a causal relationship between ferroptosis and the progression of PD, as well as to determine whether the observed epigenetic changes are causal or consequential in relation to PD.

The development of gene editing has enabled the stable modifications of the human genome from the stem cell stage. In particular, rewriting the epigenetic landscape to control gene expression through CRISPR-Cas9 and other CRISPR systems is programmable, reversible, and does not require DNA breaks [299]. Recently, CRISPRoff, a programmable epigenetic memory writer, was shown to silence gene expression durably and specifically, and gene silencing can be reversed when DNA methylation is depleted [300]. Through the use of gene editing technology, an intervention for PD could be established by designing snRNAs that target PD susceptibility genes or key regulators of ferroptosis.

In conclusion, we have discussed the roles of different epigenetic changes including DNA methylation, histone modifications and miRNAs in the pathogenesis of PD through ferroptosis mechanisms. We have elaborated on the potential interplay between these epigenetic mechanisms and ferroptosis and propose that this interplay opens new possibilities for the exploration of new therapeutic strategies for PD. Although multiple studies have confirmed that epigenetics can impact the process of ferroptosis in various diseases, relatively few studies have linked ferroptosis, epigenetic modifications and PD. Thus, further studies are needed to elucidate their interplay in PD. Additionally, research is also required to develop new small-molecule epigenetic modulators that can also inhibit ferroptosis as possible preventative treatments for PD.

Acknowledgements

This article was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371187, 32471049), Excellent Innovative Team of Shandong Province (2020KJK007), and Taishan Scholars Construction Project, Shandong.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Jun-xia Xie, Email: jxiaxie@public.qd.sd.cn.

Hua-min Xu, Email: huaminxu@qdu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Parkinson J. An essay on the shaking palsy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;14:223–36. 10.1176/jnp.14.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dexter DT, Jenner P. Parkinson disease: from pathology to molecular disease mechanisms. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;62:132–44. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marras C, Beck JC, Bower JH, Roberts E, Ritz B, Ross GW, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease across North America. NPJ Park Dis. 2018;4:21 10.1038/s41531-018-0058-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ben-Shlomo Y, Darweesh S, Llibre-Guerra J, Marras C, San Luciano M, Tanner C. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2024;403:283–92. 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01419-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collaborators GN. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:459–80. 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30499-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dorsey ER, Sherer T, Okun MS, Bloem BR. The emerging evidence of the Parkinson pandemic. J Park Dis. 2018;8:S3–s8. 10.3233/jpd-181474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang J, Dai L, Chen S, Zhang Z, Fang X, Zhang Z. Protein-protein interactions regulating α-synuclein pathology. Trends Neurosci 2024;47:209–26. 10.1016/j.tins.2024.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dickson DW, Fujishiro H, Orr C, DelleDonne A, Josephs KA, Frigerio R, et al. Neuropathology of non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Park Relat Disord. 2009;15:S1–5. 10.1016/s1353-8020(09)70769-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cattaneo C, Jost WH. Pain in Parkinson’s disease: pathophysiology, classification and treatment. J Integr Neurosci. 2023;22:132. 10.31083/j.jin2205132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Terracciano A, Luchetti M, Karakose S, Stephan Y, Sutin AR. Loneliness and risk of Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80:1138–44. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ou R, Lin J, Liu K, Jiang Z, Wei Q, Hou Y, et al. Evolution of apathy in early Parkinson’s disease: A 4-years prospective cohort study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:620762. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.620762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Broen MP, Narayen NE, Kuijf ML, Dissanayaka NN, Leentjens AF. Prevalence of anxiety in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1125–33. 10.1002/mds.26643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldman JG, Sieg E. Cognitive impairment and dementia in Parkinson disease. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020;36:365–77. 10.1016/j.cger.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA. 2020;323:548–60. 10.1001/jama.2019.22360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de Lau LM, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–35. 10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70471-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Park Relat Disord. 2016;23:1–9. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morris HR, Spillantini MG, Sue CM, Williams-Gray CH. The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2024;403:293–304. 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01478-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dong-Chen X, Yong C, Yang X, Chen-Yu S, Li-Hua P. Signaling pathways in Parkinson’s disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:73. 10.1038/s41392-023-01353-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jyothi HJ, Vidyadhara DJ, Mahadevan A, Philip M, Parmar SK, Manohari SG, et al. Aging causes morphological alterations in astrocytes and microglia in human substantia nigra pars compacta. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:3321–33. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cerri S, Mus L, Blandini F. Parkinson’s disease in women and men: what’s the difference?. J Park Dis. 2019;9:501–15. 10.3233/jpd-191683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu J, Cui Y, Zhang J, Yan R, Su D, Zhao D, et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of Parkinson’s disease from 1980 to 2023: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024;5:e464–e479. 10.1016/s2666-7568(24)00094-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marras C, Canning CG, Goldman SM. Environment, lifestyle, and Parkinson’s disease: Implications for prevention in the next decade. Mov Disord. 2019;34:801–11. 10.1002/mds.27720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen R, Gu X, Wang X. α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s disease and advances in detection. Clin Chim Acta. 2022;529:76–86. 10.1016/j.cca.2022.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Siderowf A, Concha-Marambio L, Lafontant DE, Farris CM, Ma Y, Urenia PA, et al. Assessment of heterogeneity among participants in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative cohort using α-synuclein seed amplification: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22:407–17. 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00109-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Marogianni C, Sokratous M, Dardiotis E, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Bogdanos D, Xiromerisiou G. Neurodegeneration and Inflammation-An Interesting Interplay in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21:10.3390/ijms21228421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Malpartida AB, Williamson M, Narendra DP, Wade-Martins R, Ryan BJ. Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy in Parkinson’s disease: from mechanism to therapy. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46:329–43. 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao Z, Ning J, Bao XQ, Shang M, Ma J, Li G, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation protects rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease mice via suppressing inflammation mediated by the lipopolysaccharide-TLR4 signaling pathway through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Microbiome. 2021;9:226. 10.1186/s40168-021-01107-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Trist BG, Hare DJ, Double KL. Oxidative stress in the aging substantia nigra and the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Aging Cell. 2019;18:e13031. 10.1111/acel.13031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Biondetti E, Santin MD, Valabrègue R, Mangone G, Gaurav R, Pyatigorskaya N, et al. The spatiotemporal changes in dopamine, neuromelanin and iron characterizing Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2021;144:3114–25. 10.1093/brain/awab191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rathore AS, Birla H, Singh SS, Zahra W, Dilnashin H, Singh R, et al. Epigenetic modulation in Parkinson’s disease and potential treatment therapies. Neurochem Res. 2021;46:1618–26. 10.1007/s11064-021-03334-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ding XS, Gao L, Han Z, Eleuteri S, Shi W, Shen Y, et al. Ferroptosis in Parkinson’s disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;91:102077. 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Y, Wu S, Li Q, Sun H, Wang H. Pharmacological inhibition of ferroptosis as a therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases and strokes. Adv Sci. 2023;10:e2300325. 10.1002/advs.202300325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang D, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang G, Tang P, Liu Y, et al. Targeting epigenetic modifications in Parkinson’s disease therapy. Med Res Rev. 2023;43:1748–77. 10.1002/med.21962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wei X, Cai M, Jin L. The function of the metals in regulating epigenetics during Parkinson’s disease. Front Genet. 2020;11:616083. 10.3389/fgene.2020.616083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ward RJ, Zucca FA, Duyn JH, Crichton RR, Zecca L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:1045–60. 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70117-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Geng H, Li Z, Li Z, Zhang Y, Gao Z, Sun L, et al. Restoring neuronal iron homeostasis revitalizes neurogenesis after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2220300120. 10.1073/pnas.2220300120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chifman J, Laubenbacher R, Torti SV. A systems biology approach to iron metabolism. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;844:201–25. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2095-2_10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jiang H, Wang J, Rogers J, Xie J. Brain Iron metabolism dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:3078–101. 10.1007/s12035-016-9879-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Song N, Wang J, Jiang H, Xie J. Astroglial and microglial contributions to iron metabolism disturbance in Parkinson’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864:967–73. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zucca FA, Segura-Aguilar J, Ferrari E, Muñoz P, Paris I, Sulzer D, et al. Interactions of iron, dopamine and neuromelanin pathways in brain aging and Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;155:96–119. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pyatigorskaya N, Sharman M, Corvol JC, Valabregue R, Yahia-Cherif L, Poupon F, et al. High nigral iron deposition in LRRK2 and Parkin mutation carriers using R2* relaxometry. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1077–84. 10.1002/mds.26218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Febbraro F, Giorgi M, Caldarola S, Loreni F, Romero-Ramos M. α-Synuclein expression is modulated at the translational level by iron. Neuroreport. 2012;23:576–80. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328354a1f0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ostrerova-Golts N, Petrucelli L, Hardy J, Lee JM, Farer M, Wolozin B. The A53T alpha-synuclein mutation increases iron-dependent aggregation and toxicity. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6048–54. 10.1523/jneurosci.20-16-06048.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kaur D, Peng J, Chinta SJ, Rajagopalan S, Di Monte DA, Cherny RA, et al. Increased murine neonatal iron intake results in Parkinson-like neurodegeneration with age. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28:907–13. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Belaidi AA, Bush AI. Iron neurochemistry in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease: targets for therapeutics. J Neurochem. 2016;139:179–97. 10.1111/jnc.13425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guo C, Hao LJ, Yang ZH, Chai R, Zhang S, Gu Y, et al. Deferoxamine-mediated up-regulation of HIF-1α prevents dopaminergic neuronal death via the activation of MAPK family proteins in MPTP-treated mice. Exp Neurol. 2016;280:13–23. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ayton S, Lei P, Hare DJ, Duce JA, George JL, Adlard PA, et al. Parkinson’s disease iron deposition caused by nitric oxide-induced loss of β-amyloid precursor protein. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3591–7. 10.1523/jneurosci.3439-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grolez G, Moreau C, Sablonnière B, Garçon G, Devedjian JC, Meguig S, et al. Ceruloplasmin activity and iron chelation treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:74. 10.1186/s12883-015-0331-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Devos D, Labreuche J, Rascol O, Corvol JC, Duhamel A, Guyon Delannoy P, et al. Trial of deferiprone in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:2045–55. 10.1056/NEJMoa2209254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang N, Yu X, Song L, Xiao Z, Xie J, Xu H. Ferritin confers protection against iron-mediated neurotoxicity and ferroptosis through iron chelating mechanisms in MPP+-induced MES23.5 dopaminergic cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;193:751–63. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bayır H, Dixon SJ, Tyurina YY, Kellum JA, Kagan VE. Ferroptotic mechanisms and therapeutic targeting of iron metabolism and lipid peroxidation in the kidney. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19:315–36. 10.1038/s41581-023-00689-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lei G, Zhuang L, Gan B. The roles of ferroptosis in cancer: Tumor suppression, tumor microenvironment, and therapeutic interventions. Cancer Cell. 2024;42:513–34. 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sun S, Shen J, Jiang J, Wang F, Min J. Targeting ferroptosis opens new avenues for the development of novel therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:372. 10.1038/s41392-023-01606-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:486–541. 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lei G, Zhuang L, Gan B. Targeting ferroptosis as a vulnerability in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:381–96. 10.1038/s41568-022-00459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li N, Jiang W, Wang W, Xiong R, Wu X, Geng Q. Ferroptosis and its emerging roles in cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2021;166:105466. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ajoolabady A, Aslkhodapasandhokmabad H, Libby P, Tuomilehto J, Lip GYH, Penninger JM, et al. Ferritinophagy and ferroptosis in the management of metabolic diseases. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2021;32:444–62. 10.1016/j.tem.2021.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang Y, Zhang M, Bi R, Su Y, Quan F, Lin Y, et al. ACSL4 deficiency confers protection against ferroptosis-mediated acute kidney injury. Redox Biol. 2022;51:102262. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cui Y, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Shao L, Liu G, Sun C, et al. ACSL4 exacerbates ischemic stroke by promoting ferroptosis-induced brain injury and neuroinflammation. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;93:312–21. 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bao WD, Pang P, Zhou XT, Hu F, Xiong W, Chen K, et al. Loss of ferroportin induces memory impairment by promoting ferroptosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:1548–62. 10.1038/s41418-020-00685-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lin ZH, Liu Y, Xue NJ, Zheng R, Yan YQ, Wang ZX, et al. Quercetin protects against MPP(+)/MPTP-induced dopaminergic neuron death in Parkinson’s disease by inhibiting ferroptosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:7769355. 10.1155/2022/7769355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. Ferroptosis in infection, inflammation, and immunity. J Exp Med. 2021; 218:10.1084/jem.20210518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Do Van B, Gouel F, Jonneaux A, Timmerman K, Gelé P, Pétrault M, et al. Ferroptosis, a newly characterized form of cell death in Parkinson’s disease that is regulated by PKC. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;94:169–78. 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Guiney SJ, Adlard PA, Bush AI, Finkelstein DI, Ayton S. Ferroptosis and cell death mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2017;104:34–48. 10.1016/j.neuint.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Agostini F, Bubacco L, Chakrabarti S, Bisaglia M. α-Synuclein toxicity in drosophila melanogaster is enhanced by the presence of iron: implications for Parkinson’s disease. Antioxidants. 2023; 12:10.3390/antiox12020261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Bjørklund G, Peana M, Maes M, Dadar M, Severin B. The glutathione system in Parkinson’s disease and its progression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;120:470–8. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, Daniel S, Agid Y, Javoy-Agid F, et al. Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann Neurol. 1994;36:348–55. 10.1002/ana.410360305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zeng X, An H, Yu F, Wang K, Zheng L, Zhou W, et al. Benefits of iron chelators in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Res. 2021;46:1239–51. 10.1007/s11064-021-03262-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Faucheux BA, Martin ME, Beaumont C, Hunot S, Hauw JJ, Agid Y, et al. Lack of up-regulation of ferritin is associated with sustained iron regulatory protein-1 binding activity in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2002;83:320–30. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01118.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gao M, Monian P, Quadri N, Ramasamy R, Jiang X. Glutaminolysis and transferrin regulate ferroptosis. Mol Cell. 2015;59:298–308. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. 2019;575:688–92. 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, et al. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:91–98. 10.1038/nchembio.2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yuan H, Li X, Zhang X, Kang R, Tang D. Identification of ACSL4 as a biomarker and contributor of ferroptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478:1338–43. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yue M, Wei J, Chen W, Hong D, Chen T, Fang X. Neurotrophic role of the next-generation probiotic Strain L. lactis MG1363-pMG36e-GLP-1 on Parkinson’s disease via inhibiting ferroptosis. Nutrients. 2022; 14:10.3390/nu14224886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 76.Song LM, Xiao ZX, Zhang N, Yu XQ, Cui W, Xie JX, et al. Apoferritin improves motor deficits in MPTP-treated mice by regulating brain iron metabolism and ferroptosis. iScience. 2021;24:102431. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hu ZW, Wen YH, Ma RQ, Chen L, Zeng XL, Wen WP, et al. Ferroptosis Driver SOCS1 and Suppressor FTH1 independently correlate with M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:727762. 10.3389/fcell.2021.727762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tian Y, Lu J, Hao X, Li H, Zhang G, Liu X, et al. FTH1 inhibits ferroptosis through ferritinophagy in the 6-OHDA model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17:1796–812. 10.1007/s13311-020-00929-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dai CQ, Luo TT, Luo SC, Wang JQ, Wang SM, Bai YH, et al. p53 and mitochondrial dysfunction: novel insight of neurodegenerative diseases. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2016;48:337–47. 10.1007/s10863-016-9669-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Goiran T, Duplan E, Rouland L, El Manaa W, Lauritzen I, Dunys J, et al. Nuclear p53-mediated repression of autophagy involves PINK1 transcriptional down-regulation. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:873–84. 10.1038/s41418-017-0016-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Amit M, Takahashi H, Dragomir MP, Lindemann A, Gleber-Netto FO, Pickering CR, et al. Loss of p53 drives neuron reprogramming in head and neck cancer. Nature. 2020;578:449–54. 10.1038/s41586-020-1996-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mogi M, Kondo T, Mizuno Y, Nagatsu T. p53 protein, interferon-gamma, and NF-kappaB levels are elevated in the Parkinsonian brain. Neurosci Lett. 2007;414:94–7. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kamath T, Abdulraouf A, Burris SJ, Langlieb J, Gazestani V, Nadaf NM, et al. Single-cell genomic profiling of human dopamine neurons identifies a population that selectively degenerates in Parkinson’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:588–95. 10.1038/s41593-022-01061-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ishii T, Bannai S, Sugita Y. Mechanism of growth stimulation of L1210 cells by 2-mercaptoethanol in vitro. Role of the mixed disulfide of 2-mercaptoethanol and cysteine. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:12387–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang SJ, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520:57–62. 10.1038/nature14344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Riegel G, Orvain C, Recberlik S, Spaety ME, Poschet G, Venkatasamy A, et al. The unfolded protein response-glutathione metabolism axis: a novel target of a cycloruthenated complexes bypassing tumor resistance mechanisms. Cancer Lett. 2024;585:216671. 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dixon SJ, Winter GE, Musavi LS, Lee ED, Snijder B, Rebsamen M, et al. Human haploid cell genetics reveals roles for lipid metabolism genes in nonapoptotic cell death. ACS Chem Biol. 2015;10:1604–9. 10.1021/acschembio.5b00245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Skonieczna M, Cieslar-Pobuda A, Saenko Y, Foksinski M, Olinski R, Rzeszowska-Wolny J, et al. The Impact of DIDS-Induced Inhibition of Voltage-Dependent Anion Channels (VDAC) on cellular response of lymphoblastoid cells to ionizing radiation. Med Chem. 2017;13:477–83. 10.2174/1573406413666170421102353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kuhn H, Banthiya S, van Leyen K. Mammalian lipoxygenases and their biological relevance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1851:308–30. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lin F, Chen W, Zhou J, Zhu J, Yao Q, Feng B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells protect against ferroptosis via exosome-mediated stabilization of SLC7A11 in acute liver injury. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:271. 10.1038/s41419-022-04708-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Razavi SM, Khayatan D, Arab ZN, Momtaz S, Zare K, Jafari RM, et al. Licofelone, a potent COX/5-LOX inhibitor and a novel option for treatment of neurological disorders. Prostagl Other Lipid Mediat. 2021;157:106587. 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2021.106587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ryan SK, Zelic M, Han Y, Teeple E, Chen L, Sadeghi M, et al. Microglia ferroptosis is regulated by SEC24B and contributes to neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26:12–26. 10.1038/s41593-022-01221-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lu H, Zhang B, Yin T, Hua Y, Cao C, Ge M, et al. Ferroptosis-related immune genes in hematological diagnosis of Parkinson’s diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;60:6395–409. 10.1007/s12035-023-03468-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Li K, Wang M, Huang Z-H, Wang M, Sun W-Y, Kurihara H, et al. ALOX5 inhibition protects against dopaminergic neurons undergoing ferroptosis. Pharmacol Res. 2023;193:106779. 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Shi L, Huang C, Luo Q, Xia Y, Liu W, Zeng W, et al. Clioquinol improves motor and non-motor deficits in MPTP-induced monkey model of Parkinson’s disease through AKT/mTOR pathway. Aging. 2020;12:9515–33. 10.18632/aging.103225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sun Y, He L, Wang W, Xie Z, Zhang X, Wang P, et al. Activation of Atg7-dependent autophagy by a novel inhibitor of the Keap1-Nrf2 protein-protein interaction from Penthorum Chinense Pursh. attenuates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced ferroptosis in zebrafish and dopaminergic neurons. Food Funct. 2022;13:7885–7900. 10.1039/d2fo00357k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Xi J, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Wu Q, He Y, Xu Y, et al. Hinokitiol functions as a ferroptosis inhibitor to confer neuroprotection. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;190:202–15. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wang L, An H, Yu F, Yang J, Ding H, Bao Y, et al. The neuroprotective effects of paeoniflorin against MPP+-induced damage to dopaminergic neurons via the Akt/Nrf2/GPX4 pathway. J Chem Neuroanat. 2022;122:102103. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2022.102103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sun Y, He L, Wang T, Hua W, Qin H, Wang J, et al. Activation of p62-Keap1-Nrf2 Pathway Protects 6-Hydroxydopamine-Induced ferroptosis in dopaminergic cells. Mol Neurobiol. 2020;57:4628–41. 10.1007/s12035-020-02049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Liu L, Yang S, Wang H. α-Lipoic acid alleviates ferroptosis in the MPP+-induced PC12 cells via activating the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45:422–31. 10.1002/cbin.11505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Marupudi N, Xiong MP. Genetic targets and applications of iron chelators for neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2024;4:119–30. 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.3c00066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Negida A, Hassan NM, Aboeldahab H, Zain YE, Negida Y, Cadri S, et al. Efficacy of the iron-chelating agent, deferiprone, in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;30:e14607. 10.1111/cns.14607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Goldberg AD, Allis CD, Bernstein E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell. 2007;128:635–8. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhang L, Lu Q, Chang C. Epigenetics in health and disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1253:3–55. 10.1007/978-81-15-3449-2_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Recillas-Targa F. Cancer epigenetics: an overview. Arch Med Res. 2022;53:732–40. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2022.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wang G, Wang B, Yang P. Epigenetics in congenital heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e025163. 10.1161/jaha.121.025163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Prasher D, Greenway SC, Singh RB. The impact of epigenetics on cardiovascular disease. Biochem Cell Biol. 2020;98:12–22. 10.1139/bcb-2019-0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ling C, Rönn T. Epigenetics in human obesity and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 2019;29:1028–44. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gao X, Chen Q, Yao H, Tan J, Liu Z, Zhou Y, et al. Epigenetics in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:911635. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.911635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sharma R, Bisht P, Kesharwani A, Murti K, Kumar N. Epigenetic modifications in Parkinson’s disease: A critical review. Eur J Pharmacol. 2024;975:176641. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Burgunder JM. Mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation in neurogenetic disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19:363–70. 10.1038/s41582-023-00811-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Berson A, Nativio R, Berger SL, Bonini NM. Epigenetic regulation in neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosci. 2018;41:587–98. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Li J, Jaiswal MK, Chien JF, Kozlenkov A, Jung J, Zhou P, et al. Divergent single cell transcriptome and epigenome alterations in ALS and FTD patients with C9orf72 mutation. Nat Commun. 2023;14:5714. 10.1038/s41467-023-41033-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hotchkiss RD. The quantitative separation of purines, pyrimidines, and nucleosides by paper chromatography. J Biol Chem. 1948;175:315–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sigurpalsdottir BD, Stefansson OA, Holley G, Beyter D, Zink F, Hardarson M, et al. A comparison of methods for detecting DNA methylation from long-read sequencing of human genomes. Genome Biol. 2024;25:69. 10.1186/s13059-024-03207-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Simmons RK, Stringfellow SA, Glover ME, Wagle AA, Clinton SM. DNA methylation markers in the postnatal developing rat brain. Brain Res. 2013;1533:26–36. 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.He Y, Zheng Z, Liu C, Li W, Zhao L, Nie G, et al. Inhibiting DNA methylation alleviates cisplatin-induced hearing loss by decreasing oxidative stress-induced mitochondria-dependent apoptosis via the LRP1-PI3K/AKT pathway. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:1305–21. 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Suelves M, Carrió E, Núñez-Álvarez Y, Peinado MA. DNA methylation dynamics in cellular commitment and differentiation. Brief Funct Genomics. 2016;15:443–53. 10.1093/bfgp/elw017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Jowaed A, Schmitt I, Kaut O, Wüllner U. Methylation regulates alpha-synuclein expression and is decreased in Parkinson’s disease patients’ brains. J Neurosci. 2010;30:6355–9. 10.1523/jneurosci.6119-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Schmitt I, Evert BO, Sharma A, Khazneh H, Murgatroyd C, Wüllner U. The Alpha-Synuclein Gene (SNCA) is a genomic target of methyl-CpG Binding Protein 2 (MeCP2)-implications for Parkinson’s disease and Rett syndrome. Mol Neurobiol. 2024. 10.1007/s12035-024-03974-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 121.Bogdanović O, Smits AH, de la Calle Mustienes E, Tena JJ, Ford E, Williams R, et al. Active DNA demethylation at enhancers during the vertebrate phylotypic period. Nat Genet. 2016;48:417–26. 10.1038/ng.3522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhang X, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang X. TET (Ten-eleven translocation) family proteins: structure, biological functions and applications. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:297. 10.1038/s41392-023-01537-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Guhathakurta S, Song MK, Basu S, Je G, Cristovao AC, Kim YS. Regulation of αlpha-synuclein gene (SNCA) by epigenetic modifier TET1 in Parkinson disease. Int Neurourol J. 2022;26:S85–93. 10.5213/inj.2222206.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kaas GA, Zhong C, Eason DE, Ross DL, Vachhani RV, Ming GL, et al. TET1 controls CNS 5-methylcytosine hydroxylation, active DNA demethylation, gene transcription, and memory formation. Neuron. 2013;79:1086–93. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Li Y, Qu C, Song H, Li T, Zheng J, Wu L, et al. Enriched environment priors to TET1 hippocampal administration for regulating psychiatric behaviors via glial reactivity in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion models. J Affect Disord. 2022;310:198–212. 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shu L, Qin L, Min S, Pan H, Zhong J, Guo J, et al. Genetic analysis of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;84:242.e13–242.e16. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kaut O, Schmitt I, Tost J, Busato F, Liu Y, Hofmann P, et al. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation analysis in siblings and monozygotic twins discordant for sporadic Parkinson’s disease revealed different epigenetic patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Neurogenetics. 2017;18:7–22. 10.1007/s10048-016-0497-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bate C, Williams A. cAMP-inhibits cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 and protects neurons against Amyloid-β-induced synapse damage. Biology. 2015;4:591–606. 10.3390/biology4030591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gurevich VV, Gurevich EV. A boost in learning by removing nuclear phosphodiesterases and enhancing nuclear cAMP signaling. Sci Signal. 2023;16:eadg9504. 10.1126/scisignal.adg9504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Morató X, Garcia-Esparcia P, Argerich J, Llorens F, Zerr I, Paslawski W, et al. Ecto-GPR37: a potential biomarker for Parkinson’s disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2021;10:8. 10.1186/s40035-021-00232-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Simón-Sánchez J, Schulte C, Bras JM, Sharma M, Gibbs JR, Berg D, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals genetic risk underlying Parkinson’s disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1308–12. 10.1038/ng.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Reed LA, Wszolek ZK, Hutton M. Phenotypic correlations in FTDP-17. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:89–107. 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00202-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Soutar MPM, Melandri D, O’Callaghan B, Annuario E, Monaghan AE, Welsh NJ, et al. Regulation of mitophagy by the NSL complex underlies genetic risk for Parkinson’s disease at 16q11.2 and MAPT H1 loci. Brain. 2022;145:4349–67. 10.1093/brain/awac325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Su X, Chu Y, Kordower JH, Li B, Cao H, Huang L, et al. PGC-1α promoter methylation in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134087. 10.1371/journal.pone.0134087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Henderson AR, Wang Q, Meechoovet B, Siniard AL, Naymik M, De Both M, et al. DNA methylation and expression profiles of whole blood in Parkinson’s disease. Front Genet. 2021;12:640266. 10.3389/fgene.2021.640266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kochmanski J, Kuhn NC, Bernstein AI. Parkinson’s disease-associated, sex-specific changes in DNA methylation at PARK7 (DJ-1), SLC17A6 (VGLUT2), PTPRN2 (IA-2β), and NR4A2 (NURR1) in cortical neurons. NPJ Park Dis. 2022;8:120. 10.1038/s41531-022-00355-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lin Q, Ding H, Zheng Z, Gu Z, Ma J, Chen L, et al. Promoter methylation analysis of seven clock genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2012;507:147–50. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Kaut O, Schmitt I, Wüllner U. Genome-scale methylation analysis of Parkinson’s disease patients’ brains reveals DNA hypomethylation and increased mRNA expression of cytochrome P450 2E1. Neurogenetics. 2012;13:87–91. 10.1007/s10048-011-0308-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Searles Nielsen S, Checkoway H, Criswell SR, Farin FM, Stapleton PL, Sheppard L, et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase gene methylation and parkinsonism in manganese-exposed welders. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21:355–60. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997;389:251–60. 10.1038/38444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Weake VM, Workman JL. Histone ubiquitination: triggering gene activity. Mol Cell. 2008;29:653–63. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21:381–95. 10.1038/cr.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Gopalan S, Wang Y, Harper NW, Garber M, Fazzio TG. Simultaneous profiling of multiple chromatin proteins in the same cells. Mol Cell. 2021;81:4736–.e5. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Bartosovic M, Castelo-Branco G. Multimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41:794–805. 10.1038/s41587-022-01535-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Meers MP, Llagas G, Janssens DH, Codomo CA, Henikoff S. Multifactorial profiling of epigenetic landscapes at single-cell resolution using MulTI-Tag. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41:708–16. 10.1038/s41587-022-01522-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Stuart T, Hao S, Zhang B, Mekerishvili L, Landau DA, Maniatis S, et al. Nanobody-tethered transposition enables multifactorial chromatin profiling at single-cell resolution. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41:806–12. 10.1038/s41587-022-01588-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Xiong H, Wang Q, Li CC, He A. Single-cell joint profiling of multiple epigenetic proteins and gene transcription. Sci Adv. 2024;10:eadi3664. 10.1126/sciadv.adi3664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Yue X, Xie Z, Li M, Wang K, Li X, Zhang X, et al. Simultaneous profiling of histone modifications and DNA methylation via nanopore sequencing. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7939. 10.1038/s41467-022-35650-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:295–304. 10.1038/nrg2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Evans LW, Stratton MS, Ferguson BS. Dietary natural products as epigenetic modifiers in aging-associated inflammation and disease. Nat Prod Rep. 2020;37:653–76. 10.1039/c9np00057g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Wu Y, Ma J, Yang X, Nan F, Zhang T, Ji S, et al. Neutrophil profiling illuminates anti-tumor antigen-presenting potency. Cell. 2024;187:1422–.e24. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Zhang S, Zhang Y, Duan X, Wang B, Zhan Z. Targeting NPM1 epigenetically promotes postinfarction cardiac repair by reprogramming reparative macrophage metabolism. Circulation. 2024;149:1982–2001. 10.1161/circulationaha.123.065506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Wu YL, Lin ZJ, Li CC, Lin X, Shan SK, Guo B, et al. Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:98. 10.1038/s41392-023-01333-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Sanacora G, Yan Z, Popoli M. The stressed synapse 2.0: pathophysiological mechanisms in stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022;23:86–103. 10.1038/s41583-021-00540-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Mazzocchi M, Goulding SR, Morales-Prieto N, Foley T, Collins LM, Sullivan AM, et al. Peripheral administration of the Class-IIa HDAC inhibitor MC1568 partially protects against nigrostriatal neurodegeneration in the striatal 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;102:151–60. 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Pradeepa MM, Grimes GR, Kumar Y, Olley G, Taylor GC, Schneider R, et al. Histone H3 globular domain acetylation identifies a new class of enhancers. Nat Genet. 2016;48:681–6. 10.1038/ng.3550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Pandey R, Müller A, Napoli CA, Selinger DA, Pikaard CS, Richards EJ, Bender J, Mount DW, Jorgensen RA, et al. Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:5036–55. 10.1093/nar/gkf660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kumar V, Kundu S, Singh A, Singh S. Understanding the role of histone deacetylase and their inhibitors in neurodegenerative disorders: current targets and future perspective. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022;20:158–78. 10.2174/1570159x19666210609160017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Sardoiwala MN, Sood A, Biswal L, Roy Choudhury S, Karmakar S. Reconstituted super paramagnetic protein “magnetotransferrin” for brain targeting to attenuate Parkinsonism. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15:12708–18. 10.1021/acsami.2c20990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Marinho D, Ferreira IL, Lorenzoni R, Cardoso SM, Santana I, Rego AC. Reduction of class I histone deacetylases ameliorates ER-mitochondria cross-talk in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell. 2023;22:e13895. 10.1111/acel.13895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Lang C, Campbell KR, Ryan BJ, Carling P, Attar M, Vowles J, et al. Single-cell sequencing of iPSC-dopamine neurons reconstructs disease progression and identifies HDAC4 as a regulator of Parkinson cell phenotypes. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:93–106.e6. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Dai X, Lin A, Zhuang L, Zeng Q, Cai L, Wei Y, et al. Targeting SIK3 to modulate hippocampal synaptic plasticity and cognitive function by regulating the transcription of HDAC4 in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49:942–52. 10.1038/s41386-023-01775-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Mondal P, Bai P, Gomm A, Bakiasi G, Lin CJ, Wang Y, et al. Structure-based discovery of a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) that significantly reduces Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Adv Sci. 2024;11:e2304545. 10.1002/advs.202304545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Lee SH, Lee JH, Lee HY, Min KJ. Sirtuin signaling in cellular senescence and aging. BMB Rep. 2019;52:24–34. 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.1.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Wang Y, Lv D, Liu W, Li S, Chen J, Shen Y, et al. Disruption of the circadian clock alters antioxidative defense via the SIRT1-BMAL1 Pathway in 6-OHDA-induced models of Parkinson’s disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:4854732. 10.1155/2018/4854732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Singh P, Hanson PS, Morris CM. SIRT1 ameliorates oxidative stress induced neural cell death and is down-regulated in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurosci. 2017;18:46. 10.1186/s12868-017-0364-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Li X, Feng Y, Wang XX, Truong D, Wu YC. The critical role of SIRT1 in Parkinson’s disease: mechanism and therapeutic considerations. Aging Dis. 2020;11:1608–22. 10.14336/ad.2020.0216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Arbo BD, André-Miral C, Nasre-Nasser RG, Schimith LE, Santos MG, Costa-Silva D, et al. Resveratrol derivatives as potential treatments for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:103. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Sun F, Wang J, Meng L, Zhou Z, Xu Y, Yang M, et al. AdipoRon promotes amyloid-β clearance through enhancing autophagy via nuclear GAPDH-induced sirtuin 1 activation in Alzheimer’s disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2024;181:3039–63. 10.1111/bph.16400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Thapa R, Moglad E, Afzal M, Gupta G, Bhat AA, Hassan Almalki W, et al. The role of sirtuin 1 in ageing and neurodegenerative disease: A molecular perspective. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;102:102545. 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Gebremedhin KG, Rademacher DJ. Histone H3 acetylation in the postmortem Parkinson’s disease primary motor cortex. Neurosci Lett. 2016;627:121–5. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.05.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Toker L, Tran GT, Sundaresan J, Tysnes OB, Alves G, Haugarvoll K, et al. Genome-wide histone acetylation analysis reveals altered transcriptional regulation in the Parkinson’s disease brain. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16:31. 10.1186/s13024-021-00450-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Huang M, Lou D, Charli A, Kong D, Jin H, Zenitsky G, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction-induced H3K27 hyperacetylation perturbs enhancers in Parkinson’s disease. JCI Insight. 2021; 6:10.1172/jci.insight.138088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 175.Gardian G, Yang L, Cleren C, Calingasan NY, Klivenyi P, Beal MF. Neuroprotective effects of phenylbutyrate against MPTP neurotoxicity. Neuromolecular Med. 2004;5:235–41. 10.1385/nmm:5:3:235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Zhou W, Bercury K, Cummiskey J, Luong N, Lebin J, Freed CR. Phenylbutyrate up-regulates the DJ-1 protein and protects neurons in cell culture and in animal models of Parkinson disease. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:14941–51. 10.1074/jbc.M110.211029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kulkarni A, Preeti K, Tryphena KP, Srivastava S, Singh SB, Khatri DK. Proteostasis in Parkinson’s disease: Recent development and possible implication in diagnosis and therapeutics. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;84:101816. 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Meka ST, Bojja SL, Kumar G, Birangal SR, Rao CM. Novel HDAC inhibitors provide neuroprotection in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease model of rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023;959:176067. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Toledano-Pinedo M, Porro-Pérez A, Schäker-Hübner L, Romero F, Dong M, Samadi A, et al. Contilisant+Tubastatin A Hybrids: polyfunctionalized indole derivatives as new HDAC inhibitor-based multitarget small molecules with in vitro and in vivo activity in neurodegenerative diseases. J Med Chem. 2024;67:16533–55. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Fnu S, Williamson EA, De Haro LP, Brenneman M, Wray J, Shaheen M, et al. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 enhances DNA repair by nonhomologous end-joining. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:540–5. 10.1073/pnas.1013571108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Sugeno N, Jäckel S, Voigt A, Wassouf Z, Schulze-Hentrich J, Kahle PJ. α-Synuclein enhances histone H3 lysine-9 dimethylation and H3K9me2-dependent transcriptional responses. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36328. 10.1038/srep36328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Guhathakurta S, Kim J, Adams L, Basu S, Song MK, Adler E, et al. Targeted attenuation of elevated histone marks at SNCA alleviates α-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2021;13:e12188. 10.15252/emmm.202012188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Mu MD, Qian ZM, Yang SX, Rong KL, Yung WH, Ke Y. Therapeutic effect of a histone demethylase inhibitor in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:927. 10.1038/s41419-020-03105-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Srivastava AK, Choudhury SR, Karmakar S. Neuronal Bmi-1 is critical for melatonin induced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of α-synuclein in experimental Parkinson’s disease models. Neuropharmacology. 2021;194:108372. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Kim J, Inoue K, Ishii J, Vanti WB, Voronov SV, Murchison E, et al. A MicroRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science. 2007;317:1220–4. 10.1126/science.1140481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Chen Q, Deng N, Lu K, Liao Q, Long X, Gou D, et al. Elevated plasma miR-133b and miR-221-3p as biomarkers for early Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15268. 10.1038/s41598-021-94734-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Doxakis E. Post-transcriptional regulation of alpha-synuclein expression by mir-7 and mir-153. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:12726–34. 10.1074/jbc.M109.086827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Thome AD, Harms AS, Volpicelli-Daley LA, Standaert DG. microRNA-155 regulates alpha-synuclein-induced inflammatory responses in models of Parkinson disease. J Neurosci. 2016;36:2383–90. 10.1523/jneurosci.3900-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.McMillan KJ, Murray TK, Bengoa-Vergniory N, Cordero-Llana O, Cooper J, Buckley A, et al. Loss of microRNA-7 regulation leads to α-synuclein accumulation and dopaminergic neuronal loss in vivo. Mol Ther. 2017;25:2404–14. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kabaria S, Choi DC, Chaudhuri AD, Mouradian MM, Junn E. Inhibition of miR-34b and miR-34c enhances α-synuclein expression in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:319–25. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Citterio LA, Mancuso R, Agostini S, Meloni M, Clerici M. Serum and exosomal miR-7-1-5p and miR-223-3p as possible biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease. Biomolecules. 2023; 13:10.3390/biom13050865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 193.Vallelunga A, Ragusa M, Di Mauro S, Iannitti T, Pilleri M, Biundo R, et al. Identification of circulating microRNAs for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and Multiple System Atrophy. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:156. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Chen Y, Gao C, Sun Q, Pan H, Huang P, Ding J, et al. MicroRNA-4639 Is a regulator of DJ-1 expression and a potential early diagnostic marker for Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:232. 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.He L, Chen Y, Lin S, Shen R, Pan H, Zhou Y, et al. Regulation of Hsa-miR-4639-5p expression and its potential role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Aging Cell. 2023;22:e13840. 10.1111/acel.13840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Goh SY, Chao YX, Dheen ST, Tan EK, Tay SS. Role of MicroRNAs in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5649. 10.3390/ijms20225649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Schulz J, Takousis P, Wohlers I, Itua IOG, Dobricic V, Rücker G, et al. Meta-analyses identify differentially expressed microRNAs in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2019;85:835–51. 10.1002/ana.25490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Yang Z, Li T, Cui Y, Li S, Cheng C, Shen B, et al. Elevated Plasma microRNA-105-5p level in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a potential disease biomarker. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:218. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Schließer P, Struebing FL, Northoff BH, Kurz A, Rémi J, Holdt L, et al. Detection of a Parkinson’s disease-specific MicroRNA signature in nasal and oral swabs. Mov Disord. 2023;38:1706–15. 10.1002/mds.29515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Li T, Tan X, Tian L, Jia C, Cheng C, Chen X, et al. The role of Nurr1-miR-30e-5p-NLRP3 axis in inflammation-mediated neurodegeneration: insights from mouse models and patients’ studies in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20:274. 10.1186/s12974-023-02956-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Pollini L, Galosi S, Nardecchia F, Musacchia F, Castello R, Nigro V, et al. Parkinsonism, intellectual disability, and catatonia in a young male with MECP2 variant. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2020;7:118–9. 10.1002/mdc3.12865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Cao Q, Zou Q, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Qu Y, Wang N, et al. Regulation of BDNF transcription by Nrf2 and MeCP2 ameliorates MPTP-induced neurotoxicity. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:267. 10.1038/s41420-022-01063-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Wang CS, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. BDNF signaling in context: From synaptic regulation to psychiatric disorders. Cell. 2022;185:62–76. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Brauer R, Wei L, Ma T, Athauda D, Girges C, Vijiaratnam N, et al. Diabetes medications and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a cohort study of patients with diabetes. Brain. 2020;143:3067–76. 10.1093/brain/awaa262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Jan TY, Wong LC, Yang MT, Huang CJ, Hsu CJ, Peng SS, et al. Correlation of dystonia severity and iron accumulation in Rett syndrome. Sci Rep. 2021;11:838. 10.1038/s41598-020-80723-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Zhang X, Huang Z, Xie Z, Chen Y, Zheng Z, Wei X, et al. Homocysteine induces oxidative stress and ferroptosis of nucleus pulposus via enhancing methylation of GPX4. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;160:552–65. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Periñán MT, Macías-García D, Jesús S, Martín-Rodríguez JF, Muñoz-Delgado L, Jimenez-Jaraba MV, et al. Homocysteine levels, genetic background, and cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2023;270:477–85. 10.1007/s00415-022-11361-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Bai L, Yan F, Deng R, Gu R, Zhang X, Bai J. Thioredoxin-1 rescues MPP+/MPTP-Induced ferroptosis by increasing glutathione peroxidase 4. Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58:3187–97. 10.1007/s12035-021-02320-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Huang Z, Han J, Wu P, Wu C, Fan Y, Zhao L, et al. Sorting nexin 5 plays an important role in promoting ferroptosis in Parkinson’s Disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5463134. 10.1155/2022/5463134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Shi Q, Liu R, Chen L. Ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin‑1 alleviates homocysteine‑induced ovarian granulosa cell injury by regulating TET activity and DNA methylation. Mol Med Rep. 2022;25:130. 10.3892/mmr.2022.12645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Lee JY, Nam M, Son HY, Hyun K, Jang SY, Kim JW, et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis pathway determines ferroptosis sensitivity in gastric cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:32433–42. 10.1073/pnas.2006828117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Nakamura S. Integrated pathophysiology of schizophrenia, major depression, and bipolar disorder as monoamine axon disorder. Front Biosci 2022;14:4. 10.31083/j.fbs1401004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Yamamoto H, Lee-Okada, Ikeda M, Nakamura T, Saito T, Takata A, et al. GWAS-identified bipolar disorder risk allele in the FADS1/2 gene region links mood episodes and unsaturated fatty acid metabolism in mutant mice. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;. 10.1038/s41380-023-01988-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 214.Pontel LB, Bueno-Costa A, Morellato AE, Carvalho Santos J, Roué G, Esteller M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia necessitates GSH-dependent ferroptosis defenses to overcome FSP1-epigenetic silencing. Redox Biol. 2022;55:102408. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Chen L, Xie J. Ferroptosis-Suppressor-Protein 1: A potential neuroprotective target for combating ferroptosis. Mov Disord. 2020;35:400. 10.1002/mds.27990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Vallerga CL, Zhang F, Fowdar J, McRae AF, Qi T, Nabais MF, et al. Analysis of DNA methylation associates the cystine-glutamate antiporter SLC7A11 with risk of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1238. 10.1038/s41467-020-15065-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Itou M, Kawaguchi T, Taniguchi E, Sata M. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4: a key player in chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:2298–306. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i15.2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Xie Y, Zhu S, Song X, Sun X, Fan Y, Liu J, et al. The tumor suppressor p53 limits ferroptosis by blocking DPP4 activity. Cell Rep. 2017;20:1692–704. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Turcot V, Bouchard L, Faucher G, Tchernof A, Deshaies Y, Pérusse L, et al. DPP4 gene DNA methylation in the omentum is associated with its gene expression and plasma lipid profile in severe obesity. Obesity. 2011;19:388–95. 10.1038/oby.2010.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Wang Z, Zhang Y, Fang J, Yu F, Heng D, Fan Y, et al. Decreased methylation level of H3K27me3 increases seizure susceptibility. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:7343–52. 10.1007/s12035-016-0197-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Cui X, Yun X, Sun M, Li R, Lyu X, Lao Y, et al. HMGCL-induced β-hydroxybutyrate production attenuates hepatocellular carcinoma via DPP4-mediated ferroptosis susceptibility. Hepatol Int. 2023;17:377–92. 10.1007/s12072-022-10459-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Sharma S, Taliyan R. Targeting histone deacetylases: a novel approach in Parkinson’s disease. Park Dis. 2015;2015:303294. 10.1155/2015/303294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Logie E, Van Puyvelde B, Cuypers B, Schepers A, Berghmans H, Verdonck J, et al. Ferroptosis induction in multiple myeloma cells triggers DNA methylation and histone modification changes associated with cellular senescence. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22:10.3390/ijms222212234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 224.Tong ZB, Kim H, El Touny L, Simeonov A, Gerhold D. LUHMES dopaminergic neurons are uniquely susceptible to ferroptosis. Neurotox Res. 2022;40:1526–36. 10.1007/s12640-022-00538-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Cousu C, Mulot E, De Smet A, Formichetti S, Lecoeuche D, Ren J, et al. Germinal center output is sustained by HELLS-dependent DNA-methylation-maintenance in B cells. Nat Commun. 2023;14:5695. 10.1038/s41467-023-41317-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Jiang Y, Mao C, Yang R, Yan B, Shi Y, Liu X, et al. EGLN1/c-Myc induced lymphoid-specific helicase inhibits ferroptosis through lipid metabolic gene expression changes. Theranostics. 2017;7:3293–305. 10.7150/thno.19988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Wang P, Chen Q, Tang Z, Wang L, Gong B, Li M, et al. Uncovering ferroptosis in Parkinson’s disease via bioinformatics and machine learning, and reversed deducing potential therapeutic natural products. Front Genet. 2023;14:1231707. 10.3389/fgene.2023.1231707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Kim J, Zhao H, Dan J, Kim S, Hardikar S, Hollowell D, et al. Maternal Setdb1 Is required for meiotic progression and preimplantation development in mouse. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005970. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Liu T, Xu P, Ke S, Dong H, Zhan M, Hu Q, et al. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 inhibits TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary fibrosis by regulating SNAI1 expression and the ferroptosis signaling pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2022;715:109087. 10.1016/j.abb.2021.109087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Al Chiblak M, Steinbeck F, Thiesen HJ, Lorenz P. DUF3669, a “domain of unknown function” within ZNF746 and ZNF777, oligomerizes and contributes to transcriptional repression. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:60. 10.1186/s12860-019-0243-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Shin JH, Ko HS, Kang H, Lee Y, Lee YI, Pletinkova O, et al. PARIS (ZNF746) repression of PGC-1α contributes to neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Cell. 2011;144:689–702. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Yang Y, Bedford MT. Protein arginine methyltransferases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:37–50. 10.1038/nrc3409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Zhou L, Jia X, Shang Y, Sun Y, Liu Z, Liu J, et al. PRMT1 inhibition promotes ferroptosis sensitivity via ACSL1 upregulation in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Carcinog. 2023;62:1119–35. 10.1002/mc.23550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Nho JH, Park MJ, Park HJ, Lee JH, Choi JH, Oh SJ, et al. Protein arginine methyltransferase-1 stimulates dopaminergic neuronal cell death in a Parkinson’s disease model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;530:389–95. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Shukla S, Tekwani BL. Histone deacetylases inhibitors in neurodegenerative diseases, neuroprotection and neuronal differentiation. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:537. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Zhang M, Wang J, Li J, Kong F, Lin S. miR-101-3p improves neuronal morphology and attenuates neuronal apoptosis in ischemic stroke in young mice by downregulating HDAC9. Transl Neurosci. 2023;14:20220286. 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Sanguigno L, Guida N, Anzilotti S, Cuomo O, Mascolo L, Serani A, et al. Stroke by inducing HDAC9-dependent deacetylation of HIF-1 and Sp1, promotes TfR1 transcription and GPX4 reduction, thus determining ferroptotic neuronal death. Int J Biol Sci. 2023;19:2695–710. 10.7150/ijbs.80735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Mazzocchi M, Wyatt SL, Mercatelli D, Morari M, Morales-Prieto N, Collins LM, et al. Gene co-expression analysis identifies histone deacetylase 5 and 9 expression in midbrain dopamine neurons and as regulators of neurite growth via bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:191. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Pastore D, Pacifici F, Capuani B, Palmirotta R, Dong C, Coppola A, et al. Sex-genetic interaction in the risk for cerebrovascular disease. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24:2687–99. 10.2174/0929867324666170417100318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Bazan N, Bhattacharjee S, Kala-Bhattacharjee S, Ledet A, Mukherjee P. Elovanoids are neural resiliency epigenomic regulators targeting histone modifications, DNA methylation, tau phosphorylation, telomere integrity, senescence programming, and dendrite integrity. Res Sq. 2023;. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3185942/v1.
  • 241.Marcheselli VL, Hong S, Lukiw WJ, Tian XH, Gronert K, Musto A, et al. Novel docosanoids inhibit brain ischemia-reperfusion-mediated leukocyte infiltration and pro-inflammatory gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:43807–17. 10.1074/jbc.M305841200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Bazan NG. Docosanoids and elovanoids from omega-3 fatty acids are pro-homeostatic modulators of inflammatory responses, cell damage and neuroprotection. Mol Aspects Med. 2018;64:18–33. 10.1016/j.mam.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Calandria JM, Sharp MW, Bazan NG. The docosanoid neuroprotectin D1 Induces TH-positive neuronal survival in a cellular model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015;35:1127–36. 10.1007/s10571-015-0206-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Feng Z, Lin M, Wu R. The regulation of aging and longevity: a new and complex role of p53. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:443–52. 10.1177/1947601911410223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Levine AJ, Oren M. The first 30 years of p53: growing ever more complex. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:749–58. 10.1038/nrc2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Rodriguez-Meira A, Norfo R, Wen S, Chédeville AL, Rahman H, O’Sullivan J, et al. Single-cell multi-omics identifies chronic inflammation as a driver of TP53-mutant leukemic evolution. Nat Genet. 2023;55:1531–41. 10.1038/s41588-023-01480-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Ng HH, Xu RM, Zhang Y, Struhl K. Ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6 is required for efficient Dot1-mediated methylation of histone H3 lysine 79. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:34655–7. 10.1074/jbc.C200433200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Sun ZW, Allis CD. Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast. Nature. 2002;418:104–8. 10.1038/nature00883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Cole AJ, Dickson KA, Liddle C, Stirzaker C, Shah JS, Clifton-Bligh R, et al. Ubiquitin chromatin remodelling after DNA damage is associated with the expression of key cancer genes and pathways. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:1011–27. 10.1007/s00018-020-03552-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Wang S-J, Li D, Ou Y, Jiang L, Chen Y, Zhao Y, et al. Acetylation is crucial for p53-mediated ferroptosis and tumor suppression. Cell Rep. 2016;17:366–73. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Yang Y, Ma Y, Li Q, Ling Y, Zhou Y, Chu K, et al. STAT6 inhibits ferroptosis and alleviates acute lung injury via regulating P53/SLC7A11 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:530. 10.1038/s41419-022-04971-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Li S, Wang M, Wang Y, Guo Y, Tao X, Wang X, et al. p53-mediated ferroptosis is required for 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced senescence of PC12 cells. Toxicol Vitro. 2021;73:105146. 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Zhao J, Jia Y, Mahmut D, Deik AA, Jeanfavre S, Clish CB, et al. Human hematopoietic stem cell vulnerability to ferroptosis. Cell. 2023;186:732–.e16. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Oki M, Aihara H, Ito T. Role of histone phosphorylation in chromatin dynamics and its implications in diseases. Subcell Biochem. 2007;41:319–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Liu S, Yao S, Yang H, Liu S, Wang Y. Autophagy: regulator of cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:648. 10.1038/s41419-023-06154-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 2000;290:1717–21. 10.1126/science.290.5497.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Dai Y, Zhu C, Xiao W, Huang K, Wang X, Shi C, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis hijacks host TRIM21- and NCOA4-dependent ferritinophagy to enhance intracellular growth. J Clin Invest. 2023;133:e159941. 10.1172/jci159941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Chen W, Yang W, Zhang C, Liu T, Zhu J, Wang H, et al. Modulation of the p38 MAPK Pathway by anisomycin promotes ferroptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma through phosphorylation of H3S10. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:6986445. 10.1155/2022/6986445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Hou W, Xie Y, Song X, Sun X, Lotze MT, Zeh HJ, et al. Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin. Autophagy. 2016;12:1425. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1187366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Gao M, Monian P, Pan Q, Zhang W, Xiang J, Jiang X. Ferroptosis is an autophagic cell death process. Cell Res. 2016;26:1021–32. 10.1038/cr.2016.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Jiang Y, Xie G, Alimujiang A, Xie H, Yang W, Yin F. et al. Protective effects of quercetin against MPP+-induced dopaminergic neurons Injury via the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Front Biosci. 2023;28:42. 10.31083/j.fbl2803042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Li L, Xie K, Xie H, Wang L, Li Z, Lu Q, et al. AURKB promotes colorectal cancer progression by triggering the phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 to activate CCNE1 expression. Aging. 2024;16:8019–30. 10.18632/aging.205801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Komar D, Juszczynski P. Rebelled epigenome: histone H3S10 phosphorylation and H3S10 kinases in cancer biology and therapy. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12:147. 10.1186/s13148-020-00941-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Li B, Huang G, Zhang X, Li R, Wang J, Dong Z, et al. Increased phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 is involved in Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1-induced carcinogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:124. 10.1186/1471-2407-13-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Pacaud R, Cheray M, Nadaradjane A, Vallette FM, Cartron PF. Histone H3 phosphorylation in GBM: a new rationale to guide the use of kinase inhibitors in anti-GBM therapy. Theranostics. 2015;5:12–22. 10.7150/thno.8799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Makeyev EV, Maniatis T. Multilevel regulation of gene expression by microRNAs. Science. 2008;319:1789–90. 10.1126/science.1152326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–33. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Angelopoulou E, Paudel YN, Piperi C. miR-124 and Parkinson’s disease: A biomarker with therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Res. 2019;150:104515. 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Esteves M, Abreu R, Fernandes H, Serra-Almeida C, Martins PAT, Barão M, et al. MicroRNA-124-3p-enriched small extracellular vesicles as a therapeutic approach for Parkinson’s disease. Mol Ther. 2022;30:3176–92. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Wu L, Tian X, Zuo H, Zheng W, Li X, Yuan M, et al. miR-124-3p delivered by exosomes from heme oxygenase-1 modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibits ferroptosis to attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury in steatotic grafts. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:196. 10.1186/s12951-022-01407-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Zhang Y, Li Y. Long non-coding RNA NORAD contributes to the proliferation, invasion and EMT progression of prostate cancer via the miR-30a-5p/RAB11A/WNT/β-catenin pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:571. 10.1186/s12935-020-01665-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Zhang H, He Y, Wang JX, Chen MH, Xu JJ, Jiang MH, et al. miR-30-5p-mediated ferroptosis of trophoblasts is implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Redox Biol. 2020;29:101402. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Vallelunga A, Iannitti T, Dati G, Capece S, Maugeri M, Tocci E, et al. Serum miR-30c-5p is a potential biomarker for multiple system atrophy. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46:1661–6. 10.1007/s11033-019-04614-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Jayaprakash S, Le LTM, Sander B, Golas MM. Expression of the Neural REST/NRSF-SIN3 Transcriptional Corepressor complex as a target for small-molecule inhibitors. Mol Biotechnol. 2021;63:53–62. 10.1007/s12033-020-00283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Nassar A, Satarker S, Gurram PC, Upadhya D, Fayaz SM, Nampoothiri M. Repressor Element-1 Binding Transcription Factor (REST) as a possible epigenetic regulator of neurodegeneration and microRNA-based therapeutic strategies. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;60:5557–77. 10.1007/s12035-023-03437-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Ma J, Li X, Fan Y, Yang D, Gu Q, Li D, et al. miR-494-3p promotes erastin-induced ferroptosis by targeting REST to activate the Interplay between SP1 and ACSL4 in Parkinson’s Disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:7671324. 10.1155/2022/7671324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 277.Li L, Ren J, Pan C, Li Y, Xu J, Dong H, et al. Serum miR-214 serves as a biomarker for prodromal Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:700959. 10.3389/fnagi.2021.700959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Luo J, Song G, Chen N, Xie M, Niu X, Zhou S, et al. Ferroptosis contributes to ethanol-induced hepatic cell death via labile iron accumulation and GPx4 inactivation. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:311. 10.1038/s41420-023-01608-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Rocha EM, Keeney MT, Di Maio R, De Miranda BR, Greenamyre JT. LRRK2 and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2022;45:224–36. 10.1016/j.tins.2021.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Ye H, Robak LA, Yu M, Cykowski M, Shulman JM. Genetics and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s syndrome. Annu Rev Pathol. 2023;18:95–121. 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031521-4145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Simuni T, Chahine LM, Poston K, Brumm M, Buracchio T, Campbell M, et al. A biological definition of neuronal α-synuclein disease: towards an integrated staging system for research. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23:178–90. 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00405-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Tolosa E, Garrido A, Scholz SW, Poewe W. Challenges in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:385–97. 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00030-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Bae YJ, Kim JM, Sohn CH, Choi JH, Choi BS, Song YS, et al. Imaging the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease and other Parkinsonian syndromes. Radiology. 2021;300:260–78. 10.1148/radiol.2021203341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Meissner WG, Remy P, Giordana C, Maltête D, Derkinderen P, Houéto JL, et al. Trial of lixisenatide in early Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1176–85. 10.1056/NEJMoa2312323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Zhang D, Deng Y, Kukanja P, Agirre E, Bartosovic M, Dong M, et al. Spatial epigenome-transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues. Nature. 2023;616:113–22. 10.1038/s41586-023-05795-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Mendes Serrão E, Klug M, Moloney BM, Jhaveri A, Lo Gullo R, Pinker K, et al. Current status of cancer genomics and imaging phenotypes: what radiologists need to know. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023;5:e220153. 10.1148/rycan.220153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Schirinzi T, Maftei D, Passali FM, Grillo P, Zenuni H, Mascioli D, et al. Olfactory neuron prokineticin-2 as a potential target in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2023;93:196–204. 10.1002/ana.26526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Trentin S, Oliveira BSF, Borges YFF, Rieder CRM. Evaluation of the complete Sniffin Sticks Test versus its subtests in differentiating Parkinson’s disease patients from healthy controls. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80:908–13. 10.1055/s-0042-1755268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Hill DR, Huters AD, Towne TB, Reddy RE, Fogle JL, Voight EA, et al. Parkinson’s disease: advances in treatment and the syntheses of various classes of pharmaceutical drug substances. Chem Rev. 2023;123:13693–712. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Li J, Hao D, Wang L, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhao Z, et al. Epigenetic targeting drugs potentiate chemotherapeutic effects in solid tumor therapy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4035. 10.1038/s41598-017-04406-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Morel D, Jeffery D, Aspeslagh S, Almouzni G, Postel-Vinay S. Combining epigenetic drugs with other therapies for solid tumours - past lessons and future promise. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:91–107. 10.1038/s41571-019-0267-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Burtscher J, Moraud EM, Malatesta D, Millet GP, Bally JF, Patoz A. Exercise and gait/movement analyses in treatment and diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;93:102147. 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, et al. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;1:Cd013856. 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, Zhou G, Cui C, Weng Y, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574:575–80. 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Pan RY, He L, Zhang J, Liu X, Liao Y, Gao J, et al. Positive feedback regulation of microglial glucose metabolism by histone H4 lysine 12 lactylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab. 2022;34:634–.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Zou W, Gao F, Meng Z, Cai X, Chen W, Zheng Y, et al. Lactic acid responsive sequential production of hydrogen peroxide and consumption of glutathione for enhanced ferroptosis tumor therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;663:787–800. 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Li J, Chen L, Qin Q, Wang D, Zhao J, Gao H, et al. Upregulated hexokinase 2 expression induces the apoptosis of dopaminergic neurons by promoting lactate production in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2022;163:105605. 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Yu Y, Huang X, Liang C, Zhang P. Evodiamine impairs HIF1A histone lactylation to inhibit Sema3A-mediated angiogenesis and PD-L1 by inducing ferroptosis in prostate cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023;957:176007. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Pickar-Oliver A, Gersbach CA. The next generation of CRISPR-Cas technologies and applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:490–507. 10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Nuñez JK, Chen J, Pommier GC, Cogan JZ, Replogle JM, Adriaens C, et al. Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing. Cell. 2021;184:2503–.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Pharmacologica Sinica are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES