Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1998 Jun 2;158(11):1473–1479.

Defining the physician's duty to warn: consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform

L E Ferris 1, H Barkun 1, J Carlisle 1, B Hoffman 1, C Katz 1, M Silverman 1
PMCID: PMC1229377  PMID: 9629112

Abstract

Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform was formed to consider the duty of Ontario physicians in circumstances where a patient threatens to kill or cause serious bodily harm to a third party. The panel was concerned about the implications of any duty to inform on the integrity of the physician-patient relationship, particularly with respect to confidentiality. The panel agreed that regulations safeguarding the confidentiality of patient information ought to be changed only if there is a critical reason for doing so, but, after deliberation, the panel members concluded that the need to protect the public from serious risk of harm is a paramount concern that should supersede the duty of confidentiality. The recommendations reported here were endorsed in principle by the panelists and the groups they represented (the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the Ontario College of Family Physicians and the Ontario Medical Association) and are being implemented by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (216.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appelbaum P. S. Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect. Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Apr;142(4):425–429. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.4.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appelbaum P. S. The new preventive detention: psychiatry's problematic responsibility for the control of violence. Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;145(7):779–785. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.7.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Appelbaum P. S., Zonana H., Bonnie R., Roth L. H. Statutory approaches to limiting psychiatrists' liability for their patients' violent acts. Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Jul;146(7):821–828. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.7.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck James C. Violent patients and the Tarasoff duty in private psychiatric practice. J Psychiatry Law. 1985 Fall-Winter;13(3-4):361–376. doi: 10.1177/0093185385013003-404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Denkowski Kathryn M., Denkowski George C. Client-counselor confidentiality: an update of rationale, legal status, and implications. Pers Guid J. 1982 Feb;60(6):371–375. doi: 10.1002/j.2164-4918.1982.tb00690.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickens B. M. Legal issues in medical management of violent and threatening patients. Can J Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;31(8):772–780. doi: 10.1177/070674378603100816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferris L. E., Sandercock J., Hoffman B., Silverman M., Barkun H., Carlisle J., Katz C. Risk assessments for acute violence to third parties: a review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;42(10):1051–1060. doi: 10.1177/070674379704201006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman D. L., Jacob T. Anatomy of a second generation Tarasoff case. Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Feb;36(1):35–38. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenberg Linn Turner. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness. J Psychiatry Law. 1984 Fall;12(3):315–348. doi: 10.1177/009318538401200303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones S. L. More on confidentiality. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1993 Jun;7(3):123–124. doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(93)90037-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kagle J. D., Kopels S. Confidentiality after Tarasoff. Health Soc Work. 1994 Aug;19(3):217–222. doi: 10.1093/hsw/19.3.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kermani E. J., Drob S. L. Tarasoff decision: a decade later dilemma still faces psychotherapists. Am J Psychother. 1987 Apr;41(2):271–285. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1987.41.2.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kleinman I. Confidentiality and the duty to warn. CMAJ. 1993 Dec 15;149(12):1783–1785. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leong G. B., Eth S., Silva J. A. The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution: the criminalization of Tarasoff. Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;149(8):1011–1015. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.8.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lidz C. W., Mulvey E. P., Gardner W. The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):1007–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McNiel D. E., Binder R. L. Clinical assessment of the risk of violence among psychiatric inpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Oct;148(10):1317–1321. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.10.1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shane F. Confidentiality and dangerousness in the doctor-patient relationship. The position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association. Can J Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;30(4):293–301. doi: 10.1177/070674378503000416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith-Bell M., Winslade W. J. Privacy, confidentiality, and privilege in psychotherapeutic relationships. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):180–193. doi: 10.1037/h0079520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES