Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1999 Apr 6;160(7):989–995.

Autologous versus allogeneic transfusion: patients' perceptions and experiences

I D Graham 1, D Fergusson 1, H Dokainish 1, J Biggs 1, L McAuley 1, A Laupacis 1
PMCID: PMC1230233  PMID: 10207337

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative autologous donation is one way to decrease a patient's exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion. This study was designed to determine patients' perceptions about the autologous blood donation process and their experiences with transfusion. METHODS: To assess patient perception, a questionnaire was administered a few days before surgery to patients undergoing elective cardiac and orthopedic surgery in a Canadian teaching hospital. All patients attending the preoperative autologous donation clinic during a 10-month period were eligible. A convenience sample of patients undergoing the same types of surgery who had not predonated blood were selected from preadmission clinics. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively to assess actual transfusion practice in all cases. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients underwent cardiac surgery (40 autologous donors, 40 nondonors) and 73 underwent orthopedic surgery (38 autologous donors, 35 nondonors). Of the autologous donors, 75 (96%) attended all scheduled donation appointments, 73 (93%) said that they were "very likely" or "likely" to predonate again, and 75 (96%) said that they would recommend autologous donation to others. There was little difference in preoperative symptoms between the autologous donors and the nondonors, although the former were more likely than the latter to report that their overall health had remained the same during the month before surgery (30 [75%] v. 21 [52%] for the cardiac surgery patients and 30 [79%] v. 18 [51%] for the orthopedic surgery patients). When the autologous donors were asked what they felt their chances would have been of receiving at least one allogeneic blood transfusion had they not predonated, the median response was 80%. When they were asked what their chances were after predonating their own blood, the median response was 0%. The autologous donors were significantly less likely to receive allogeneic blood transfusions (6 [15%] for cardiac surgery and 3 [8%] for orthopedic surgery) than were the nondonors (14 [35%] for cardiac surgery and 16 [46%] for orthopaedic surgery). They were, however, more likely to receive any transfusion (autologous or allogeneic) than were the nondonors (25 [63%] v. 14 [35%] for cardiac surgery and 31 [81%] v. 16 [46%] for orthopedic surgery). INTERPRETATION: Patients who underwent preoperative autologous blood donation were positive about the experience and did not report more symptoms than patients who did not donate blood preoperatively. Autologous donors overestimated their chances of receiving allogeneic blood transfusions had they not predonated and underestimated their chances after they had predonated. They were less likely to receive allogeneic transfusions, but more likely to receive any type of transfusion, than were patients who did not predonate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (144.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blajchman M. A. Allogeneic blood transfusions, immunomodulation, and postoperative bacterial infection: do we have the answers yet? Transfusion. 1997 Feb;37(2):121–125. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37297203512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Domen R. E., Ribicki L. A., Hoeltge G. A. An analysis of autologous blood donor motivational factors. Vox Sang. 1995;69(2):110–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1995.tb01679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forgie M. A., Wells P. S., Laupacis A., Fergusson D. Preoperative autologous donation decreases allogeneic transfusion but increases exposure to all red blood cell transfusion: results of a meta-analysis. International Study of Perioperative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):610–616. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldman M., Rémy-Prince S., Trépanier A., Décary F. Autologous donation error rates in Canada. Transfusion. 1997 May;37(5):523–527. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37597293885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kanter M. H., van Maanen D., Anders K. H., Castro F., Mya W. W., Clark K. Preoperative autologous blood donations before elective hysterectomy. JAMA. 1996 Sep 11;276(10):798–801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee S. J., Liljas B., Churchill W. H., Popovsky M. A., Stowell C. P., Cannon M. E., Johannesson M. Perceptions and preferences of autologous blood donors. Transfusion. 1998 Aug;38(8):757–763. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38898375515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Linden J. V., Kruskall M. S. Autologous blood: always safer? Transfusion. 1997 May;37(5):455–456. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37597293872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McAlister F. A., Clark H. D., Wells P. S., Laupacis A. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion does not cause adverse sequelae in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of unconfounded studies. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):171–178. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McVay P. A., Andrews A., Hoag M. S., Polan D., Skettino S., Stehling L. C., Strauss R. G., Toy P. T. Moderate and severe reactions during autologous blood donations are no more frequent than during homologous blood donations. Vox Sang. 1990;59(2):70–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1990.tb05011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McVay P. A., Andrews A., Kaplan E. B., Black D. B., Stehling L. C., Strauss R. G., Toy P. T. Donation reactions among autologous donors. Transfusion. 1990 Mar-Apr;30(3):249–252. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30390194347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McVay P. A., Strauss R. G., Stehling L. C., Toy P. T. Probable reasons that autologous blood was not donated by patients having surgery for which crossmatched blood was ordered. Transfusion. 1991 Nov-Dec;31(9):810–813. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31992094667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wittig M., Osswald P. M., Lorentz A., Jani L. Kurze Abnahmeintervalle bei der präoperativen Eigenblutspende im Konzept der autologen Transfusion. Anaesthesist. 1994 Jan;43(1):9–15. doi: 10.1007/pl00013235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yomtovian R., Ceynar J., Kepner J. L., Buhl M. Predeposit autologous blood transfusion: an analysis of donor attitudes and attributes. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1987 Feb;13(2):45–50. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30104-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES