Significance
This study establishes how narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) affects brain fluid dynamics through lack of orexins by comparing NT1 patients to healthy wake and sleeping controls. Using fast functional MRI, we revealed that even during wakefulness, NT1 leads to high vasomotor and low brain arterial pulsations. Healthy sleep produces brain arterial and respiratory pulsations dominating those observed in NT1 while the vasomotor activity remains comparable. In a phantom model we show a direct relationship between the used biometrics and pulsatile water flow simulating cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow in the intracranial space. We conclude that deficient orexin–noradrenaline axis in humans leads to opposing changes in vasomotor and arterial induced brain pulsation that may propagate to altered glymphatic solute transportation.
Keywords: brain pulsations, narcolepsy type 1, sleep, orexin/hypocretin, noradrenaline
Abstract
Sleep promotes cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to interstitial fluid (ISF) exchange in the brain facilitated by brain pulsations. Especially brain vasomotion and arterial pulsations modulated by noradrenaline drive the intracranial fluid dynamics. Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) entails lessened orexinergic output to wake-promoting systems including the noradrenergic locus coeruleus. As arousal state and noradrenergic signaling affect CSF-ISF clearance, we chose patients with NT1 as a human orexin-targeted model of sleep-related pathology bridging the gap between healthy awake and sleep with respect to CSF flow pulsations. We also investigated the sensitivity of magnetic resonance encephalography to detect flow with a phantom model and sought to replicate earlier pulsation findings in sleep. In this case–control study, we used fast functional MRI to map brain pulsations in groups of healthy sleeping controls (n = 13), healthy awake controls (n = 79), and awake NT1 (n = 21) patients. We measured the very low frequency (0.008 to 0.1) and cardiorespiratory frequencies and calculated in each frequency band the coefficient of variation, spectral power, and full band spectral entropy to obtain brain pulsation maps. We uncovered a brain pulsation profile from healthy waking to sleep to a sleep-related pathology NT1 prominently affected in the vascular-related vasomotor and brain arterial pulsations. Our results established how drivers of brain hydrodynamics are affected by a specific loss of key neurotransmitter governing arousal compared to healthy sleep. We also showed with a phantom model that MREG is sensitive to flow-related signal changes and solidified evidence of brain pulsations in the healthy states of sleep and wakefulness.
Sleep is an integral part of human well-being and survival. Recent research has shown that sleep serves a housekeeping role by maintaining brain homeostasis via increased metabolic waste clearance from the brain, which may protect against various neurodegenerative disorders (1). Investigation of brain fluid dynamics has gained significant momentum after the discovery of this clearance pathway now designated as the glymphatic system. In this model, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) enters the brain via paravascular spaces around penetrating arteries, from where arterial pulsation sieves it to the brain parenchyma facilitated by the aquaporin-4-channels (AQP4) expressed on perivascular astrocytes. Once entering the parenchyma, CSF mixes with the interstitial fluid (ISF) and exits the brain to venous paravascular spaces, along dural lymphatic vessels and the cranial nerves toward deep cervical lymph nodes (2–6). With this outflow of fluid, toxic metabolites like amyloid beta exit the brain. The precise route and the role of diffusion for fluid and metabolite clearance remains debated (7–9) but accumulating evidence from animal and human research points to an active convective fluid flow (6, 10–12).
The intracranial CSF flow is driven by the composite of three physiological pulsations: 1) intrinsic slow frequency vasomotion i.e. vasodilation/vasoconstriction and hyperemia following neuronal activation, 2) respiration-related intrathoracic pressure changes that induce rhythmic in/outflow of venous blood followed by reciprocal out/inflow of CSF, and finally 3) brain arterial pulsations induced by heart beats (13–17). Thus, it is postulated that CSF/ISF flow is facilitated by physiological brain pulsations that we have established to be measurable by fast functional MRI (fMRI) (18). In earlier fast fMRI studies, we found that the power of these pulsations increases in healthy sleep (19) and as a function of sleep depth (20).
The ascending reticular arousal system regulates brain arousal state via brainstem nuclei like the noradrenergic locus coeruleus (LC) (21). Tonic activation of telencephalic projections from LC neurons maintain arousal during wakefulness that switches to phasic activation during non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep (22). Indeed, noradrenaline release contributes to memory consolidation during NREM sleep in mice, while also suppressing brain glymphatic clearance (22, 23). Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a neurological disease where the lack of excitatory orexin (also called hypocretin) signaling from the hypothalamus has a direct downstream effect on the neocortex and ascending reticular arousal system, leading to sudden fluctuations in arousal and cataplexy (24). Electroencephalography (EEG) studies on NT1 have shown spectral power alteration at sleep-onset, and that patients have more nighttime awakenings and N1 sleep at the cost of less slow-wave sleep compared to healthy controls (25, 26). Orexin-A is a key neuromodulator for brain arousal control with high activity during normal wakefulness, a reduction during sleep and reduced/absent activity in NT1 (27). It is proposed that the absence of orexinergic regulation over ascending reticular arousal system in NT1 leads to intermitted monoamine release from brainstem nuclei like the noradrenergic LC (28, 29) making NT1 a natural human model for studying the effect of disrupted neurotransmission on the brain pulsations that drive CSF flow.
In our earlier study, we had found that NT1 patients presented a mixed profile of signal variance where very low frequency (VLF) variance was increased but cardiorespiratory variance decreased compared to healthy controls (30). Yet, the relation of brain pulsations between NT1 and physiological states of healthy sleep and wakefulness remain unestablished—an inquiry that answers how neuropathological arousal state fluctuations falling in between wake and sleep caused by a loss of a specific neurotransmitter alters forces driving brain clearance.
As orexins modulate both arousal state and noradrenergic signaling that are known to affect CSF-ISF clearance, we chose NT1 as an orexin-targeted model of sleep-related pathology bridging the gap between healthy awake and NREM sleep in respect of proposed CSF flow facilitated by brain pulsations. Thus we hypothesized that 1) vasomotor brain pulsations would follow the order NREM sleep > NT1 > awake state while NT1 would show lower cardiorespiratory pulsations compared to the other groups, and 2) we would find a brain area where the pulsations differences are present across all groups. To this end, we used magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) to investigate brain pulsations in awake NT1 patients in contrast to healthy controls in sleeping and awake states. MREG, like most fMRI, is a noninvasive T2*-weighted sequence but samples the whole brain 10 times per second enabling accurate depiction of fast cardiorespiratory-related signal fluctuations (31, 32). Furthermore, as convective flow is a prerequisite to the glymphatic theory, we used a phantom model to test the sensitivity of MREG signal to capture strictly pulsatile water flow related events. Our hypothesis was that pulsatile flow would induce MREG signal oscillations through T2*-effects which would be captured by our pulsation biometrics. Finally, we sought to replicate our earlier results in NREM sleep, and to unify the used biometrics for brain pulsation estimation.
Results
To compare brain pulsations between awake NT1 patients (from now on NT1 group), and healthy controls (awake HC group) during wakefulness and NREM sleep (sleeping HC), we employed a standardized measure of MREG time-wise signal amplitude changes (coefficient of variation: CV) and frequency domain fast Fourier transformation (FFT) spectral power calculation (spectral power: SP). We have earlier successfully applied CV to assess physiological brain pulsations in Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, and primary central nervous system lymphoma (33–35). Further, we have earlier shown that all brain pulsations exhibited increased SP in healthy NREM sleep compared to the awake state (19).
Powerful Vasomotor Pulsations Characterize Waking State Narcolepsy Type 1 and Healthy NREM Sleep.
The sleeping HC group showed higher CV in the VLF band compared to the awake HC in a widespread bilateral spatial distribution (16,099 voxels, 435 cm3) covering parts of the occipital, parietal, temporal, and frontal brain regions and the thalamus. We also found higher CV overlapping with parts of both lateral ventricles, superior/posterior parts of the superior sagittal sinus, and bilateral Sylvian fissure (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Compared to the awake HC group, we observe that the NT1 group had higher VLF CV (3,572 voxels, 96 cm3) in parts of the bilateral occipital cortices, the left temporal lobe, and lateral ventricle (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Interestingly, we observed no significant voxels between the sleeping HC and NT1 groups.
Fig. 1.
(A) CV difference maps between the three study groups in VLF and cardiorespiratory frequencies. (B) SP difference maps between the three groups in VLF and cardiorespiratory frequencies. (C) SE full band difference maps between the three groups. In the VLF pulsations, the NT1 and sleeping HC groups showed higher CV and SP compared to awake HC. In the cardiorespiratory pulsations, the sleeping HC group was characterized by highest CV and SP followed by the awake HC and finally NT1 groups. In the full band, the awake HC group showed highest SE followed by the sleeping HC and NT1 groups (black box highlights where NT1 SE < sleeping HC SE). In all comparisons, the group sizes were NT1 n = 21, sleeping HC n = 13, and awake HC n = 79. VLF = very low frequency, CV = coefficient of variation, x = sagittal MNI152 coordinate, z = axial MNI152 coordinate, R = right, L = left, NT1 = narcolepsy type 1.
Compared to the awake HC group, the sleeping HC group had regions of higher SP in the VLF band (5,239 voxels, 141 cm3) overlapping with parts of the bilateral occipital, sensorimotor, and temporal areas of the brain and in the right somatosensory area. The higher VLF SP also overlapped with parts of the bilateral Sylvian fissure and occipital parts of the superior sagittal sinus (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Compared to the awake HC group, the NT1 group showed higher VLF SP (329 voxels, 9 cm3) occipitally overlapping with parts of the bilateral occipital pole, cuneal, intracalcarine, supracalcarine cortices, lingual gyrus, and the right lateral occipital cortex (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S4). As with VLF CV, the VLF SP did not differ between the sleeping HC and NT1 groups.
NREM Sleep Induces the Most Pronounced Brain Arterial Pulsations Followed by Wakefulness and Lastly Narcolepsy Type 1.
In the cardiac frequency band, we found that the sleeping HC group had greater CV compared to the awake HC group in widespread regions (18,000 voxels, 486 cm3) covering parts of the bilateral occipital, somatosensory, sensorimotor, parietal, and frontal regions and right temporal areas (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S5). Further, the higher cardiac CV results encompassed parts of the frontal and occipital superior sagittal sinus, the left lateral ventricle, the right medial Sylvian fissure and inferior parts of the brainstem. Compared to the awake HC group, the NT1 group showed greater cardiac CV in a smaller occipital brain area (350 voxels, 9 cm3) including parts of the bilateral supracalcarine and cuneal cortices, and the left precuneus and lateral occipital cortices (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Compared to the NT1 group, the sleeping HC group had widespread regions of higher cardiac CV (28,500 voxels, 770 cm3) encompassing parts of the bilateral occipital, parietal, frontal, and temporal areas. They also showed higher cardiac CV in parts of the brainstem, around frontal and occipital parts of the superior sagittal sinus, and both lateral ventricles (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7).
We found that cardiac frequency band SP was higher in the sleeping HC group compared to the awake HC group (6,411 voxels, 173 cm3) in regions including bilateral occipital and frontal parts of the brain, and on the right side somatosensory, sensorimotor, and temporal areas. This contrast also showed higher cardiac SP around the frontal parts of the superior sagittal sinus and crossing the right medial Sylvian fissure (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Compared to the NREM sleep group, the NT1 group showed a large volume of lower cardiac SP (26,512 voxels, 716 cm3) including the bilateral occipital, sensorimotor, somatosensory, frontal, temporal and basal areas, as well as parts of the frontal and occipital superior sagittal sinus, brainstem, the left Sylvian fissure and both lateral ventricles (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S9).
NREM Sleep in Healthy Controls Promotes High Respiratory Brain Pulsations, Especially Compared to Narcolepsy Type 1.
In the respiratory frequency band, the sleeping HC group had higher CV (3,042 voxels, 82 cm3) compared to the awake HC group in regions including parts of the bilateral frontal areas and the right somatosensory, sensorimotor, and occipitotemporal areas, as well as the right medial Sylvian fissure (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S10). Compared to the NT1 group, we found that the NREM sleep group showed higher respiratory CV (5,656 voxels, 153 cm3) in regions overlapping with parts of the bilateral occipital, somatosensory, and sensorimotor areas and the thalamus. We also found higher respiratory CV in parts of the brainstem, and both lateral ventricles (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S11). We observed no results between the awake HC and NT1 groups.
Compared to the awake HC, the sleeping HC group had higher respiratory SP (854 voxels, 23 cm3) in parts of the bilateral frontal gyri and the right somatosensory, sensorimotor, and temporal areas including part of the medial Sylvian fissure (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S12). Compared to the NT1 group, the NREM sleep group had higher respiratory SP basally, including parts of the bilateral lateral ventricles, thalamus, caudate nucleus, and the right lingual gyrus (445 voxels, 12 cm3) (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S13). As with respiratory CV, we found no differences in respiratory SP between the awake HC and NT1 groups.
To summarize, our findings in the time domain measured with CV together with results in the spectral domain measured with SP show that vasomotor and brain arterial pulsations differed the most between the awake HC, sleeping HC, and NT1 groups. Notably, cardiac CV was greatest in NREM sleep, followed by healthy wakefulness, and least in the NT1 group. Vasomotor pulsations were higher in the sleeping HC and NT1 groups compared to the awake HC group, but interestingly did not differ from each other according to the CV and SP metrics. Respiratory pulsations were elevated in the NREM sleep group when compared to both awake HC and NT1 groups, but did not differ in the contrast between awake HC and NT1 groups.
Spectral Entropy Is Low in Healthy NREM Sleep Compared to Wakefulness, but Even Lower in Narcolepsy Type 1.
Entropy is clinically used as an index of anesthesia depth based on the decreasing entropy as a function of anesthesia depth in EEG (36, 37). In our prior studies, we demonstrated a decline in MREG spectral entropy (SE) as awake healthy individuals transition into NREM sleep, with an even steeper decrease associated with deeper sleep stages (19, 20).
We found that compared to the awake HC group, the sleeping HC group presented lower SE (1,441 voxels, 39 cm3) in regions overlapping with parts of the bilateral occipital and the left superior temporal gyrus (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S14). Compared to the awake HC group, the NT1 group showed lower SE (17,401 voxels, 470 cm3) in widespread regions encompassing parts of the bilateral occipital, sensorimotor, somatosensory, temporal, and medial areas. Moreover, the lower SE extended to posterior parts of the right lateral ventricle, lower parts of the brainstem, and posterior parts of the superior sagittal sinus (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S15). Compared to the NREM sleep group, the NT1 group has lower SE confined to a small area (28 voxels, 0.8 cm3) overlapping with parts of the right superior parietal lobule and angular gyrus (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S16).
To conclude, our results showed that SE was higher in awake HC than during healthy NREM sleep, and lowest in the awake NT1 group.
Brain Arterial Pulsations within an Occipital Brain Region Showing Differences across All Groups Exhibit High Accuracy in Differentiation of the Three States.
As the cardiac CV follows a top–down order in parts of the left precuneus and cuneal cortices (Fig. 2A), we further quantified the difference with mean cardiac CV comparison between the groups and assessed the ability of these pulsations to separate the three groups with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with area under the curve (AUC).
Fig. 2.
(A) The left occipital brain area common to all comparisons when comparing mean cardiac CV between the study groups (red). (B) The three groups were readily separable from mean cardiac CV values in the mutual ROI (gray: NT1 vs. sleeping HC, blue: NT1 vs. awake HC, green: sleeping HC vs. awake HC). (C) In the mutual ROI, cardiac pulsations were highest in the sleeping HC group, followed by the awake HC and finally by the NT1 groups. Group sizes were NT1 n = 21, sleeping HC n = 13, and awake HC n = 79. HC = healthy controls, NT1 = narcolepsy type 1, CV = coefficient of variation, ROI = region of interest, ROC = receiver operating characteristics, x = sagittal MNI152 coordinate, y = coronal MNI152 coordinate, R = right, L = left.
This analysis indicated a highly accurate separation of the sleeping HC and NT1 groups (AUC 98.9%, Fig. 2B, gray) and good differentiation between the NT1 and the awake HC groups (AUC 87.5%, Fig. 2B, blue) as well as between the sleeping HC and awake HC groups (AUC 75%, Fig. 2B, green). We further found that the mean cardiac CV values in this ROI differed significantly between the three groups (Fig. 2C; Kruskal–Wallis P-value = 6.1E-09; awake HC vs. NT1 P-value = 8.8E-07; awake HC vs. NREM sleep P-value = 9.7E-03; NREM sleep vs. NT1 P = 3.4E-08).
Pulsatile Water Flow Induces Rapid and Prominent Amplitude Oscillations in the MREG Time Signal.
As MREG is a T2*-weighted sequence sensitive to dephasing of protons spins in the static magnetic field (38, 39), we assessed its sensitivity and the extent of signal fluctuations caused by water flow in a phantom model with different water flow rates and calculated the pulsation biometrics.
Our phantom results confirmed that both SP and CV increased as a function of mean flow rate in the flow-masked ROI (Fig. 3 A and B). SE showed a sharp decrease from the baseline to attain a moderately steady state between the first and second flow speeds, followed by an increase with the fastest flow (Fig. 3B). Compared to the median of the baseline, the median SP in 7 cm/s, 14 cm/s, and 21 cm/s was higher by a factor of 14, 25, 28 respectively. The median CV in different flow rates compared to the baseline was higher by a factor of 4.06, 4.77, and 4.91 (SI Appendix, Table S1). The spectrogram in Fig. 3A also showed higher values outside the principal 4.4 Hz peak compared to other flow speeds, hinting that an even higher sampling rate might be beneficial to capture the fastest flow events (SI Appendix, Table S1: 12.8, 3.1, and 1.6 times greater median background SP in the 21 cm/s flow rate compared to the baseline, 7, and 14 cm/s flow rates, respectively).
Fig. 3.
(A) Increasing water flow in the phantom model induced strong and separable T2*-weighted MREG signal amplitude oscillations (10 s signal examples, baseline as the lowest signal example and the 21 cm/s as the highest), as reflected also in the periodogram, where different flow rates correspond to distinct principal frequencies, and the 1.0 Hz peak is a known artifact from the scanner helium pump. The oscillations were also evident in the spectrogram (principal frequencies, first decree harmonics, heterodynes, and aliasing in the highest frequencies that partly exceed the critical sampling rate of 5 Hz). (B) Median biometrics measured in the frequency domain (SP) and the time domain (CV) increased as a function of water flow rate, while spectral entropy showed an initial drop and then remained stable, given that the model included only a single principal frequency event per flow rate, and finally increased due to aliasing at the highest flow rate. Semilog10 plots of SP and CV are presented for better visualization as plotting the raw values would require a close up of the box plots where not all values are presented due to variation within the voxels. The raw values are available in Dataset S2. A.u. = arbitrary units, cm = centimeter, s = second, Log = base 10 logarithm, Hz = hertz, SP = spectral power, CV = coefficient of variation.
Cardiorespiratory Frequencies, Blood Pressure, Movement, and Sensitivity Analyses.
We did not find any group differences in the mean respiratory frequencies. Sleep is known to lower heart rate (40), and in line with this, we did find that the sleeping HC group has lower mean cardiac frequency compared to the awake HC and NT1 groups (Kruskal–Wallis P = 0.010, NREM sleep vs. awake HC post hoc P = 0.0074; NREM sleep vs. NT1 P = 0.040; we find no differences in awake HC vs. NT1 P = 0.72). We found no significant differences between the medicated and nonmedicated NT1 patients in the mean cardiac frequencies. These results further confirmed the arousal states of subjects in the sleeping HC and NT1 groups (SI Appendix, Tables S2 and S3 and Datasets S1 and S2).
To exclude group differences in blood pressure profile that may have affected pulsation analyses (41), we compared systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the groups, and between the medicated and nonmedicated NT1 patients. We found no differences in any of these measures. To further exclude apparent pulsation findings due to head motion, we compared the mean relative and absolute motions, finding no significant group differences (SI Appendix, Tables S2 and S3 and Datasets S1 and S2).
We did not find differences in CV/SP/SE maps at any pulsation frequency within the awake HC group. This suggests that our awake HC group is rather homogenous with respect to brain pulsations, such that the differences seen in contrasts between the awake HC and sleeping HC groups likely reflect sleep physiology, while differences between the HC groups and NT1 group likely reflect pathology.
In the sensitivity analyses on medication effect and arousal (please see SI Appendix, Supporting Information Texts 2and 3), we found no voxel-wise differences between the medicated and nonmedicated NT1 patients in any pulsation biometric (CV/SP/SE) in any pulsation frequencies (VLF and cardiorespiratory frequencies), even when regressing out medication effect, or in an overall model for positive or negative medication effects. In a weighted randomize model, we found that in the NT1 group medication has a positive effect on a small area in VLF CV (145 against the original 3,572 voxels) and SP (105 voxels against the original 329 voxels) while other pulsations remained unaffected (SI Appendix, Fig. S17). We found no significant differences between the medicated and nonmedicated NT1 patients in mean brain pulsation biometrics in any pulsation frequencies (SI Appendix, Fig. S18), no significant differences between the NT1 and awake HC group in HRV RMSSD but significantly higher HRV RMSSD (ANOVA P = 0.0013) in the sleeping HC group compared to the NT1 (P = 0.0032) and awake HC groups (P = 0.0016) (SI Appendix, Fig. S19 and Table S2 and Dataset S2). We found no significant differences between the EEG alpha (P = 0.92) or beta (P = 0.68) powers between 9 NT1 patients and 7 HC. Finally, we found no significant medication effect to HRV RMSSD in the NT1 group (P = 0.63, 95% CI = −2.9 to 1.7, estimate = −0.60, R2 = 0.30).
Discussion
We used fast fMRI to investigate brain pulsations across the healthy awake state, NREM sleep, and in NT1 to understand how the forces driving the intracranial brain fluid flow are affected by physiological arousal states and specific pathology of arousal control. As proof of concept, we created a simple phantom model, which confirmed that the MREG sequence is sensitive to the flow of water providing a proxy of CSF and blood flow in vivo. We further sought to replicate in the new healthy sleeping control group our earlier findings of increased brain pulsations in NREM sleep (19).
We found that 1) NREM sleep induces high cardiorespiratory brain pulsations compared to the awake HC and NT1 groups, but interestingly there were no differences in the vasomotor pulsations between the NREM sleep and NT1 groups, 2) based on phantom measurements, water flow induces signal oscillations in the MREG data that are reflected in the pulsation biometrics, 3) brain arterial pulsations in a posterior brain area partly overlapping with the left precuneus and cuneal cortices showed high ability to separate the three study groups, 4) our earlier findings that all brain pulsations are increased in NREM sleep compared to the awake state are replicated here, and finally 5) the same biometrics show that vasomotor pulsations are higher but brain arterial pulsations are lower in the NT1 group compared to awake HC group.
The glymphatic model proposes that CSF enters the brain parenchyma via arterial perivascular spaces and mixes with ISF, which then convey neurotoxic waste and solutes via bulk flow to and along perivenous spaces, ultimately exiting the brain to peripheral lymphatic circulation (1, 16, 17). Thus, the convective bulk flow of CSF to ISF to peripheral lymphatics is a prerequisite of the glymphatic model. The in- and outflow of intracranial CSF is thought to be driven by three distinct brain pulsations that arise from the interplay of different intra- and extracranial physiological phenomena: brain arterial pulsation waves arising from the cardiac cycle, alternating blood and CSF flow propagating from respiratory cycle, and intrinsic brain vasomotion (18).
The low frequency vasomotor waves derive from intrinsic and spontaneous reciprocal ballooning and constriction of the brain vasculature, which contribute to the regulation of local cerebral blood flow (42–44). Present findings show that NREM sleep and NT1 are characterized by high vasomotor pulsation as measured with both CV and SP, which link to CSF flow and brain clearance. Interestingly, we found no differences in vasomotor CV or SP between the NT1 and NREM sleep groups. In humans, fMRI has revealed that NREM sleep presents prominent slow-frequency oscillations in T2*-weighted blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which induce an anticorrelated CSF flow in the 4th cerebral ventricle (13), which are also present in awake individuals (45). In mice, a task-induced increase in the amplitude of vasomotor frequencies correlated with tracer clearance from the brain, thus directly linking vasomotion to brain clearance (46), while sleep further increased the CSF-ISF exchange that drive tracer flux through periarterial spaces and the brain parenchyma (23). Of note, adrenergic receptor blockade in awake mice increased the tracer clearance comparable to that observed in sleep (23), thus establishing a link between brain clearance and noradrenergic signaling. Also in mice, NREM sleep manifested increased amplitude of rhythmic vasomotion of the brain pial arteries, along with reciprocal anticorrelated changes in the adjacent perivascular space (47) that is key element of the glymphatic system, which led the authors to speculate that noradrenaline may mediate this phenomenon. Indeed, in mice during NREM sleep noradrenergic signaling from the LC has been shown to drive slow vasomotor oscillations that act as a pump for brain fluid transport driving brain clearance (48). The brainstem LC neurons give rise to ascending noradrenergic projections, that comprise part of the ascending reticular arousal system (49). During wakefulness the LC neurons maintain high static baseline activity, which shifts to a phasic, slowly oscillating form upon sleep onset (22, 50, 51). In mice, intracerebroventricular infusion and iontophoretic application of orexin-A increased the intrinsic noradrenergic cell firing in the LC (29, 52). Orexin-A and -B are excitatory neurotransmitters, which sustain cortical arousal during wakefulness through direct cortical projections arising from the hypothalamus, and indirectly via ascending reticular arousal system and LC (49, 53). Patients with NT1 are by definition deficient in orexin-A (54). In humans, a quantitative MRI study comparing NT1 patients to healthy controls revealed lower R2 values in a brainstem area corresponding to the LC, suggesting the presence of a structural anomaly (55). Thus, the primary deficiency of orexin in human NT1 occurs along with an LC abnormality, likely in relation to inconsistent noradrenaline release (28). We propose herein that NT1 may induce a pattern of vasomotor activity not differing from that during sleep, but distinctly higher than in the healthy awake state through secondary effects on orexin deficiency on the regulation of noradrenergic activity, given that orexinergic activity is low in healthy sleep and low/absent in NT1 (27). This may imply that, even in the awake state, NT1 could promote noradrenaline-driven vasomotor oscillations akin to those seen in sleep (22). The strong wake cerebral vasomotion occurring in NT1 patients may underlie their propensity to nighttime arousals and less slow wave sleep compared to healthy controls (25), but may also reflect a compensatory mechanism for the lower brain arterial pulsations in NT1 (Fig. 1A). We suggest that to maintain brain fluid homeostasis, the system increases vasomotor pulsations that then take up part of the functions of the brain arterial pulsations i.e., sieving CSF to brain parenchyma to facilitate CSF-ISF exchange. The other view is that both the high vasomotion and low arterial pulsations are strictly pathological, but we deem the former theory more probable given that the elderly patients with NT1 have been associated with lower brain amyloid burden (56) suggesting functioning CSF-ISF clearance.
Brain arterial pulsations arising from the cardiac rhythm are thought to drive CSF from the periarterial spaces into the brain parenchymal ISF, thereby facilitating downstream brain fluid clearance (16). We show herein that NREM sleep leads to wide spatial distribution of high cardiac frequency CV and SP compared to the awake state, but especially compared to the NT1 group (Fig. 1 A and B). Of note, the NT1 patients showed lower cardiac CV compared to awake HC, albeit on a spatially smaller scale. Given that the pharmacologically induced increase in brain arterial pulsation in mice likewise increased the CSF-ISF exchange rate facilitating brain clearance (4), present findings suggest that the interplay of CSF-ISF dynamics driven by brain arterial pulsations is most prominent in NREM sleep followed by the awake state, and lowest in the NT1 patients. This may relate to the hypothesized inconsistent noradrenergic release from the LC projections caused by orexin deficiency in NT1, especially given that LC is known to regulate intracerebral vascular tone (57). In cardiac CV, we identified an occipital brain area where the three groups were readily separable (Fig. 2 A and B). This ROI overlapping with part of the posterior hub of the default mode network (DMN) seems to show the greatest group differences, whereby the sleeping HC group presented the most pronounced cardiac CV followed by lower estimates in the awake HC and NT1 groups (Fig. 2C). In NT1, there is monotonous internetwork information propagation between the DMN and other networks (58), and the dynamic resting state activity of the DMN is unstable compared to that in healthy controls (59). Thus, this occipital ROI may represent the downstream brain area most vulnerable to the altered brain arterial pulsations.
Apart from brain vasomotion and arterial pulsations, intrathoracic pressure changes caused by the respiratory cycle promote venous blood drainage from the brain, leading to reciprocal in- and outflow of intracranial CSF (15, 60). Present results show that, compared to the awake HC, the sleeping HC group had higher respiratory SP, with an even wider spatial distribution of higher respiratory CV. The same holds for the comparison of the NT1 group with the sleeping HC group (Fig. 1 A and B), but there were no differences in the contrast of the NT1 and awake HC groups. These findings confirm that, while NREM sleep is characterized by higher drive of intracranial CSF across all physiological pulsations, NT1 may impose only a minor effect on the respiratory-related flow of CSF.
The onset of sleep can be measured with entropy metrics calculated from the anesthesia monitor EEG data, where NREM sleep is characterized by low entropy (36, 37). Spectral entropy (SE) is a metric for spectral information content, which in the present context of MREG, describes how the spectral power is distributed across the sampled frequencies. The complexity of the system, here the brain, is reduced when given frequencies begin to predominate, which occurs in NREM sleep indicated by our findings both earlier (19) and in this study. We find that the NT1 group showed lower SE when compared to the awake HC group with an even wider spatial distribution than when comparing the sleeping HC and awake HC groups (Fig. 1C). Our SE results between the awake HC group and both the NREM sleep and NT1 groups mainly overlap with the very low frequency CV and SP results in the posterior parts of the brain, and to a lesser extent with the cardiac CV results (Fig. 1 A–C). In NREM sleep and NT1, the drop in SE compared to the awake HC is then partly due to changes in the arterial pulsations, but mostly attributable to the higher vasomotor activity. This is further supported by earlier studies indicating increased low-frequency BOLD amplitude upon onset of sleep (61, 62). Thus, we suggest that the low SE that associates with high physiological brain pulsations in NREM sleep reflects a brain state optimized to facilitate brain clearance. To our surprise, the NT1 group showed even lower SE in an area in and bordering the right angular gyrus—a posterior node of the DMN—when compared to the sleeping HC group (Fig. 1C). We show herein that the pathological arousal in NT1 leads to a local brain state with an even lower level of spectral content than attributed to sleep.
Pulsatile flow of CSF induces signal oscillations in a T2*-weighted MRI sequence like MREG, when movement of water protons induces loss of spin phase coherence (38, 39). We find herein that increasing flow speeds are detectable in MREG time signal amplitude oscillations, power spectra, and spectrograms (Fig. 3A, please see SI Appendix, Supporting Information Text 1 for a more thorough explanation). In our phantom experiment, the CV and SP increase as a function of increasing flow rates. In the brain, pulsating flow is omnipresent: CSF in the intracranial CSF compartments and perivascular spaces, ISF in the brain parenchyma and blood in the vasculature. The flow rates in our phantom model (from mean of 7 to 21 cm/s) are physiologically relevant reflecting those seen in the human intracranial vasculature (e.g., 5.1 cm/s in the perforating basal arteries and 9.5 cm/s in the superior sagittal sinus) and CSF spaces (from 5 to 25 cm/s) (63–66). Then in the human brain, interpretation of our results depends both on the integration of the physiological phenomenon (pulsation frequency) and spatial content (where the voxel is). E.g., in a voxel with high density of arteries, or indeed a large artery, the increased cardiac-related CV and SP would be interpreted as summation of increased pulsation of the artery and flow of blood and perivascular CSF, whereas the same increase in the middle of the lateral ventricle would be interpreted as the effect of cardiac beats to the flow of CSF. We note that the MREG-derived biometrics presented here cannot directly differentiate the actual proportion of ISF compartment flow, as this flow, as well as the compartment itself, is quite complex and consequently the related signal variation is obscured by averaging in the relatively large 3 mm voxels. The different mechanisms and their effects behind vasomotor and cardiorespiratory pulsations are described in the above paragraphs. The spatial difference in CV and SP maps (Fig. 1 A and B) is due to SP’s exponential nature and lack of normalization by the mean (reflecting the water content within the voxel) and different signal dimension. SE serves as an arousal metric and as a complementary biometric to especially SP, as when the power of a pulsation frequency increases, the SE decreases (19, 20). Thus, the three pulsation biometrics calculated here depict the same phenomenon complementarily integrating its different characteristics.
Strengths and Limitations
The relation of physiological brain pulsations to CSF/ISF/blood flow is not without ambiguity, as real-life biological systems include many processes that may cause T2*-weighted signal oscillations. However, the T2*-weighted signal oscillations in the frequency bands that comprise cardiorespiratory brain pulsations naturally correspond to breathing and cardiac rhythm (30, 34, 67), which are known to causally induce CSF/ISF flow and blood flow in the brain (13, 16, 60). Furthermore, our phantom study confirmed that water flow has a major impact on the T2*-weighted signal oscillations.
The usual treatment for NT1 entails arousal enhancing medication, which may influence brain pulsations. As NT1 is rare and cessation of medication worsens the symptoms, we chose to include medicated patients in our study group. Our analyses on medication effect show (SI Appendix, Supporting Information Text 2) that in our dataset of NT1, only on a small area is affected via medication by an increase in vasomotor CV and SP while other pulsation frequencies remain unaffected. Even the exclusion of these voxels would not change the interpretation of the original results. While medication should be noted when interpreting the pulsation results, the NT1 pathology common to all patients seems to predominate over individual treatment effects in our dataset.
NT1 is characterized by sudden shifts in the arousal state, and even falling asleep when no external input is received. Our analyses on arousal state in the NT1 group consistently suggest that the patients are not in a state of heightened arousal nor are they asleep, and that the medication status does not predict for increasing or decreasing arousal state (SI Appendix, Supporting Information Text 2). All these considerations suggest that while the pathology is known to fluctuate the arousal state, the NT1 patients in our population were awake during scanning, although EEG is required to confirm the status.
The lessened orexinergic signaling in NT1 affects cortical arousal via direct effects, and via secondary impairment of the ascending reticular arousal system, which includes contributions from the noradrenergic LC and also ascending dopaminergic, cholinergic, and histaminergic pathways (49). Noradrenaline strongly inhibits glymphatic clearance via activation of adrenergic receptors (23), and slow oscillation in noradrenaline release during NREM sleep causes reciprocal vasoconstriction and dilation, i.e., vasomotion that is anticorrelated with the diameter of the associated paravascular space (22, 47, 51). As noradrenaline strongly affects vascular tone, and given that our results in NT1 were most pronounced in the brain arterial and vasomotor frequencies, we postulate that our results mostly originate from the primary lack of orexin-A leading altered noradrenergic signaling from the LC, although other monoamine systems may prove to influence brain pulsations.
Conclusions
Present findings confirm that intracranial fluid dynamics depend heavily on the state of arousal, and engagement of the orexinergic system and the ascending reticular arousal system. We propose that the orexin-A deficiency of NT1 may propagate to slow rhythmic oscillation of the brain vasculature similar to that seen in healthy NREM sleep, which persist even during wakefulness, likely driven by loss of orexinergic cortical excitation and by a secondary mechanism of slowly intermittent noradrenergic output from the LC. Thus, especially vasomotor and brain arterial pulsations were affected by NT1 compared to the awake HC, but unlike NREM sleep, NT1 further leads to prominently lower brain arterial pulsations. Since both vasomotion and arterial pulsations drive the CSF-ISF exchange, we suppose that the high vasomotor activity seen in NT1 compensates for the low arterial pulsations. This phenomenon may help to explain the low cerebral amyloid burden in elderly patients with NT1, insofar as high awake vasomotor activity may compensate for the suggested altered CSF clearance in NT1. Finally, we verified that MREG biometrics reflect flow-related events, and replicated our earlier findings in NREM sleep compared to healthy wakefulness, which substantiates the robustness of the method for detecting the underlying physiological phenomena.
Materials and Methods
Participants.
We conducted a retrospective registry analysis utilizing electronic patient records from Oulu University Hospital, focusing on patients diagnosed with narcolepsy, thereby identifying 66 matching cases. Among these, we successfully recruited 23 individuals diagnosed with NT1 to the study. Confirmed NT1 diagnosis with cataplexy was used as inclusion criteria. Potential confounding brain-related conditions were ruled out through screening of clinical history and by examination of structural T1 magnetic resonance images (MRI) by a neuroradiologist. One patient was excluded due to failed off-resonance correction of MREG data, and one patient was excluded due to a low mean respiratory frequency (0.11 Hz), partially overlapping with the cut-off frequency for VLF (0.1 Hz). Thus, we used data from 21 NT1 patients (NT1 group: 28.1 ± 9.2 y, 12 females) in the analyses. Among these, 15 had CSF orexin-A sampling, which ranged from 0 to 185 pg/mL. The NT1 diagnosis for the patient with 185 pg/mL was later confirmed in a specialized sleep center after progression of the disease and was thus included in the NT1 group. The remaining patients without CSF-sampling had NT1 diagnosis with reported cataplexy indicating orexin deficiency (54). Three patients were unmedicated, and 18 had medication for daytime sleepiness and cataplexy (SI Appendix, Table S4).
For the sleeping group, we recruited 20 healthy controls from the general population of university students by email advertisement. The subjects were healthy and without self-reported continuous medication. A neuroradiologist examined the structural T1 MR images for any brain-related findings. The final sleep group consisted of 13 subjects (sleeping HC group: 30.5 ± 9.84 y, 6 females) with 5 min of sufficient (at least 70% of the epochs) N1/N2 sleep as confirmed by EEG (mean across subjects: 94% epochs of N1 or N2 sleep) during their MREG scanning.
We recruited 85 healthy controls with no self-reported continuous medication from the general population by advertisement. Among these, three were excluded for excess head motion (MREG and EEG preprocessing below), and three were excluded due to low mean respiratory frequency (0.095 Hz, 0.071 Hz, 0.12 Hz) that partially overlapped with the upper VFL cut-off frequency. This led to a final group size of 79 (awake HC group: 37.3 ± 15.7 y, 52 females).
All human data were collected between 2017 and 2021. All participants gave written informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Medical Research in the Northern Ostrobothnia District of Finland and was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Data Acquisition.
All participants were scanned in Oulu University Hospital with a Siemens Magnetom Skyra 3 T MRI scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Germany), using a 32-channel head coil and fast fMRI sequence MREG. MREG is a single-shot three-dimensional (3D) sequence that employs a spherical stack of spirals undersampling the 3D k-space (31, 68). MREG data were reconstructed by L2‐Tikhonov regularization with lambda = 0.1, with the latter regularization parameter determined by the L‐curve method (69). An interscan crusher gradient was set to 0.1 to optimize sensitivity for physiological signals and to prevent slow signal drifts from stimulated echoes. MREG includes a dynamic off‐resonance correction in k-space that corrects for respiration-induced dynamic field‐map changes in the fMRI using the 3D single-shot technique (70). A T1-weighted Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition with Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) scan was acquired for MREG data registration (see SI Appendix, Table S5 for MREG and T1 imaging parameters). EEG, End-tidal CO2 monitoring, photoplethysmogram, and scanner physiological data were recorded simultaneously with the MREG acquisition in a multimodal manner as described by Korhonen et al. (71).
The subjects in the NT1 and awake HC groups were instructed to lie still and awake with eyes fixated on a cross in a computer screen for the whole duration of the scan. The sleeping HC group subjects were instructed to lie eyes closed and to fall asleep at will. Soft pads over the subjects’ ears with additional earplugs were used to minimize head motion and to block scanner noise. The arousal state of the subjects was checked after the scanning by verbal inquiry. The HC and NT1 groups were scanned in the afternoon starting at 4:00 to 6:00 PM and the sleeping HC group at 22:00 PM. The scans of the NT1 and sleeping HC group spanned 10 min, and the scans of the awake HC group from 5 to 10 min.
For the phantom model, we used a Siemens Magnetom Vida 3 T MRI scanner with 64-channel head coil, due to withdrawal from service of the Siemens Magnetom Skyra 3 T MRI machine used for human studies. We applied identical imaging parameters as with the human data (SI Appendix, Table S5, for the setup please see Phantom model pulsation parameter calculation).
EEG of the NREM sleep group was recorded with a 256-channel high-density net, using the Electrical Geodesics MR-compatible GES 400 Magstim system. Electrode impedances were confirmed to be <50 kΩ, the sampling rate was 1 kHz, and high-pass filtering was set to 0.01 Hz. Signal quality was tested outside the scanning room by recording 30 s epochs of data with eyes open and eyes closed. All EEG channels were visually checked.
For sensitivity analysis on arousal, the same procedure was used to acquire EEG from 9 NT1 patients (26.0 ± 5.2 y, 8 females) and 7 HC (mean age 25.7 ± 4.6 y, 6 females) not simultaneous to the MREG imaging in this study.
MREG and EEG Preprocessing.
The Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the brain (FMRIB) software library (FSL) (72) FEAT pipeline was used for MREG data preprocessing. The data were high-pass filtered with a cut-off frequency of 0.008 Hz. The first 180 time points were excluded to minimize T1-relaxation effects. To optimize the amount of sleep data, the 5 min of EEG-recordings containing the most sleep was chosen for each sleeping HC group subject, and the corresponding MREG data (2,861 full brain samples per subject) were extracted. For the NT1 group, the first 5 min of the entire 10-min scans were used to ensure better vigilance. Five minutes of MREG data were used for the awake control group to match that of the other groups. Motion was corrected in four layers: 1) the raw MREG amplitude data were despiked with Analysis of Functional Neuroimages’ (73) (AFNI) tools, 2) FSL MCFLIRT was used to correct for bulk head motion, 3) each subjects’ MCLIRT motion correction data were used to exclude subjects with any absolute motion exceeding 1.5 mm (half the voxel size), relative motion over 0.5 mm, as well as the earlier implemented thresholds described by Järvelä et al. (30) for mean absolute motion (no subject > 0.6 mm) and mean relative motion (no subject > 0.07 mm), and finally 4) the mean absolute and relative movement were compared between the groups. We used FSL Brain Extraction Tool with neck and bias field correction for brain extraction from the 3D MPRAGE images. MREG data were spatially smoothed with a 5 mm full width and half maximum (FWHM) Gaussian kernel. For later image registration purposes, we obtained FEAT’s MREG to 3D anatomical (full-search, 12 degrees of freedom) and MREG to the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 (MNI152) 4 mm standard space transformation matrices.
For the phantom model MREG data, preprocessing steps were as above, except for omission of brain extraction and despiking, as the model was stationary.
After recording, the sleeping HC group’s EEG data were converted to a file format suitable for preprocessing with the Brain Electrical Source Analysis Research software (Version 7.0). Data were then preprocessed using the Brain Vision Analyzer (Version 2.1; Brain Products). Standard preprocessing cleanup strategies were used to remove MRI gradient artifacts and ballistocardiographic (BCG) artifacts. First, we segmented the data to the correct length using the trigger marks. Gradient artifacts due to static and dynamic magnetic fields were corrected using a continuous method with no downsampling, and no filtering options (74, 75). After visual inspection of the data, we removed BCG artifacts due to blood flow effects in the scalp and brain, and from the B0 field using average artifact subtraction (74). We used semiautomatic mode to confirm that all BCG peaks were correctly chosen, and manually marked any incorrect peaks. The same preprocessing was conducted on the similar EEG data acquired not simultaneously to MREG imaging from 9 NT1 patients and 7 awake HC (from where alpha and beta band powers were calculated for subgroup analysis of arousal; see SI Appendix, Fig. S20 and Supporting Information Text 2). After preprocessing of the sleeping HC EEG data, two trained clinical neurophysiologists, scored the sleep stages according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines for clinical sleep studies. The final sleep stages were decided by consensus.
Cardiorespiratory Data, Blood Pressure, and Heart Rate Variability.
The cardiorespiratory frequencies were extracted from end-tidal CO2 and photoplethysmogram (PPG) data. In the absence of these, we instead used the MREG data (for respiratory frequencies: 41 awake HC, one NREM sleep group and three NT1 subjects, and for cardiac frequencies: 39 awake HC, two NREM sleep group and six NT1 subjects). As previously described, MREG data enable accurate estimation of cardiorespiratory frequencies (30, 34, 67). We used MATLAB to obtain frequency domain spectra of the physiological data, and to estimate cardiorespiratory peak (mean) values. When using MREG data for cardiorespiratory frequency estimation, the voxel-wise preprocessed time signal data were transformed to voxel-wise FFT spectra with AFNI tools. Then, voxels in the fourth ventricle and superior sagittal sinus were used to estimate the respiratory frequencies, and voxels in the anterior/middle cerebral arteries and the lateral ventricles were used to estimate the cardiac frequencies, as these regions show the most pronounced cardiorespiratory power to visual inspection. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured while seated before scanning, with loss of data for nine awake HCs and one NT1 patient.
To further assess the arousal state of the study groups, and to explore arousal and medication effects in the NT1 group, heart rate variability rms of the successive normal-to-normal intervals (HRV RMSSD) was calculated from the PPG data. This value is known to reflect the vagal outflow i.e., parasympathetic modulation that is prominent while at rest increasing the RMSSD value especially in NREM sleep (76, 77). Reciprocally, states of heightened arousal (either physiological or medication-related) and stress lower the HRV RMSSD (78, 79). MATLAB was used to find the location of the maximal slope in each of the pulse waves. The formula used for RMSSD is
where N = number of samples, RR = beat-to-beat interval. The data were visually checked, and a threshold of 5% of errors in recognizing the RR interval was used as an exclusion criterion to ensure robustness of the RMSSD estimation. This led to the exclusion of 2 awake HC, 1 NT1 patient, and 1 sleeping HC from the HRV analyses (awake HC n = 48, mean age 31.7 ± 13.3 y, 25 females; NT1 n = 14, mean age 26.9 ± 6.85 y, 10 females; NREM sleep n = 11 mean age 28.8 ± 3.58 y, 4 females). HRV RMSSD values were compared across the study groups, and a general linear model was used to model the effect of medication status to HRV RMSSD while controlling for sex and age in the NT1 group.
Voxel-Wise Brain Pulsation Parameter Calculations.
For each subject, the MREG full band data were filtered around their cardiac and respiratory peaks (0.05 Hz on both sides of the principal peak resulting in a total range of 0.1 Hz) and to the very low frequency (VLF: 0.008 to 0.1 Hz) range, using AFNI functions. As filtering demeans the signal, we introduced the full band signal mean back to the filtered data alike to as in FSL preprocessing pipeline after high pass filtering. Then, we used AFNI tools to calculate voxel-wise CV maps from the filtered data by calculating the mean and SD of the data, and then dividing the SD by the mean. CV provides a standardized measure of dispersion for each pulsation frequency in time domain. The transformation matrices derived from FSL FEAT were used to register the calculated CV maps to 3 mm MNI152 standard space with the FSL Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT). The resulting brain maps were finally masked with a 3 mm MNI152 binary mask to remove extraneous voxels outside the standard brain.
We calculated SP by using FSL functions to extract the cardiorespiratory and VLF bins of the corresponding pulsation range from the MREG voxel-wise FFT spectrum. We then used AFNI tools to summate all values within these pulsation ranges, resulting in voxel-wise spectral power maps. The transformations to the 3 mm MNI152 standard brain and brain masking as above were used to produce SP maps in standard space. SP is a metric that reflects how much power accumulates into different signal frequencies in the spectral domain across the imaging experiment.
The preprocessed full band MREG data (0.008 to 5 Hz) was used to calculate in MATLAB the voxel-wise spectral entropy (SE) based on Shannon entropy, producing single value voxel-wise SE maps. SE depicts the spectral information content of the system and signal complexity, where a higher SE reflects greater signal complexity, with less prominent spectral peaks. As with the CV and SP maps, we applied the transformation to 3 mm MNI152 standard brain and masking to produce voxel-wise SE maps in standard space.
All calculated pulsation parameter maps were compared between the groups with FSL randomize (80) using 10,000 iterations and correcting for age and sex in the design, resulting in multiple comparisons corrected P-value maps (significant at P < 0.05). For visualization, we transformed the comparisons with significant results to 1 mm MNI152 standard space, with projection upon the MRIcroGL MNI152 standard brain using the FSLeyes spline option.
Finally, we created five models to test for homogenous pulsation profile in the awake HC group and to explore voxel-wise medication and arousal effects in the NT1 group (SI Appendix, Supporting Information Text 2).
Mutual Difference Mask ROC Analysis.
We used a posterior brain area where CV differences were present in all comparisons to create a binary mask (Fig. 2A). We then calculated ROC AUC curves for each comparison. Furthermore, mean CV values were extracted from the mask and compared between the groups (Fig. 2 B and C).
Phantom Model Pulsation Parameter Calculation.
Flow is omnipresent in the human brain where different fluids composed mostly of water traverse compartments through pathways with different diameters e.g., around 3 mm in the distal anterior cerebral artery and 8.7 mm in the superior sagittal sinus (81, 82). The fluids also propagate with varying velocities through different brain structures e.g., 41 cm/s in the anterior cerebral artery, 5.1 cm/s in the perforating basal arteries, around 9.8 cm/s in the superior sagittal sinus and from 5 to 25 cm/s in the CSF compartments (63–66). Thus, to estimate how water flow influences the brain pulsation parameters calculated from the MREG signal, we created a phantom model where a compromise between these different physiological parameters were met.
A hole with a 6 mm diameter was drilled through a pineapple, and tubes providing water inlet and outlet conduits were attached. We then used a peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow 313S) to fill the tubes and the hole with water. MREG is a T2*-weighted sequence, making it sensitive if not specific to the dephasing of proton spins caused by movement of water in the static magnetic field of the scanner (38, 39). We made MREG recordings during four states: 1) baseline with inactive pump, 2) mean pulsatile water flow of 7 cm/s, 3) mean flow of 14 cm/s and 4) mean flow of 21 cm/s.
We then calculated voxel-wise CV, SP, and SE maps of the phantom, and extracted an ROI consisting of the voxels containing water. The ROI was created by manually segmenting the water-filled space inside the pineapple from a T1 structural image. We inverted the FEAT’s transformation matrix for structural to MREG images, and used the resulting matrix to register the binary ROI mask to MREG space (579 voxels, 16 cm3). From this mask, we extracted both time signal and spectral data (Fig. 3A). To only include steady-state data, time signals were edited to exclude from the analysis time points coinciding with accelerating pump frequency, resulting in 462 samples per flow speed. The full band CV, SP, and SE were calculated as described above in the four different flow states. To investigate nonprincipal, i.e., the background spectral power distribution, we removed the peak frequencies per flow speed from the phantom spectral data, and calculated SP as described above. RStudio tools were used to create the example voxel spectrum, 10 s time signal examples, spectrogram and boxplots from all voxels within the mask (Fig. 3 A and B). For better visualization in the boxplots, we calculated base 10 logarithms of the CV and SP values.
The final editing of all figures was done with Inkscape version 1.3.2 and GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.30. In the analyses above, we used RStudio (2023.12.1), MATLAB (R2023b), AFNI (18.0.05), and FSL (5.0.9).
Statistics.
Visual estimation and the Shapiro–Wilk test were used to examine data normality (SI Appendix, Table S6). Kruskal–Wallis test and subsequently the pairwise Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons with Holm–Bonferroni multiple comparison correction was applied to test for group differences in the mutual mask mean CV values, mean absolute and relative movement values, mean cardiac frequency, and to compare systolic- and mean arterial pressure values, as these measures did not follow the normal distribution. Mean respiratory frequency and diastolic blood pressure values were tested with one-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise Tukey’s honest significant difference test, as these measures were normally distributed. The CV, SP, and SE brain maps were compared with FSL’s randomize, which uses conditional Monte Carlo random permutations implementing family-wise error-corrected threshold-free cluster enhancement correction (80) that results in multiple comparisons corrected P-value maps. In all comparisons, group sizes were awake HC (n = 79), NT1 (n = 21), and sleeping HC (n = 13) except for the blood pressure comparisons, where missing data led to awake HC (n = 70), NT1 (n = 20), and sleeping HC (n = 13). While investigating the awake HC CV/SP/SE maps, the first group had n = 40 and the second n = 39. For sensitivity analyses statistics, please see SI Appendix, Tables S2, S3, and S7 and Supporting Information Text 3. Significant threshold for all tests: P < 0.05 (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Analysis pipeline. (A) The preprocessed MREG time domain data (black signal) was transformed into the frequency domain, where the pulsation frequencies are depicted by color (green = VLF, blue = respiratory frequencies, red = cardiac frequencies). MREG frequency domain data or peripheral physiological data were used to determine the highest peak of cardiorespiratory frequencies, and a band of 0.05 Hz on both sides of these peaks was used to filter the MREG data (i.e., to a total range of 0.1 Hz per band). Full band spectral data were used to calculate SE. VLF and extracted individual cardiorespiratory spectral data served to calculate SP maps, whereas time domain filtered VLF and individual cardiorespiratory data were used to calculate CV maps. (B) As an example, full band and three filtered time signals are presented. The brain slices of the mean pulsation metrics derived from the awake HC show that, while VLF pulsations are prominently cortical, respiratory pulsations distribute mostly to medial and venous areas (yellow boxes in the respiratory CV axial slice and SP sagittal slice), and ventricular areas (LV in the respiratory CV sagittal slice), and cardiac pulsations to ventricular (LV, IV in cardiac CV sagittal slice) and arterial areas (middle and frontal cerebral arteries areas marked with MCA and ACA respectively in the cardiac CV axial and cardiac SP sagittal slices). SP = spectral power, CV = coefficient of variation, SE = spectral entropy, Fb = full band, VLF = very low frequencies, ACA = anterior cerebral artery, MCA = middle cerebral artery, LV = lateral ventricle, IV = 4th ventricle, Hz = hertz, s = second, a.u. = arbitrary units.
Supplementary Material
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
Dataset S02 (XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank all study subjects whose attendance made this study possible. We also thank all imaging personnel who participated in data acquisition and Jussi Kantola for computational administration. We wish to acknowledge CSC—IT Center for Science, Finland, for computational resources. We thank Prof. Paul Cumming of Bern University for critical reading of the manuscript. Finally, we offer our thanks to the funders of this study: Research Council of Finland (275342, 314497, 338599, Profi 3, 314497, 335720) (V. Kiviniemi), Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (210043) (V. Kiviniemi), The EU Joint Programme Neurodegenerative Disease Research 2022-120 (V. Kiviniemi), Finnish Cultural Foundation (M.J., J.K.), North Ostrobothnia Regional Fund (J.K.), The University of Oulu Scholarship Foundation (J.K.), Medical Research Center Oulu (H.H., J.K.), The Paulo Foundation (M.J.), Instrumentarium Science Foundation (M.J., J.K.), Finnish Medical Foundation (M.J., J.K.), Orion Research Foundation (M.J., J.K.), Suomalais-Norjalainen Lääketieteen Säätiö (M.J.), Maire Taponen Foundation (J.K.), Finnish Brain Foundation (J.K., L.R.), and Tauno Tönning Foundation (J.K., V. Korhonen).
Author contributions
M.J., H.A., and V. Kiviniemi designed research; M.J., H.H., V. Korhonen, N.H., L.R., J.T., H.A., and V. Kiviniemi performed research; M.J., N.H., T.V., K.H., M.K., and J.P. analyzed data; J.K. collected data; T.V. collected electroencephalography; and M.J., J.K., H.H., and V. Kiviniemi wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. R.L.R. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
Contributor Information
Matti Järvelä, Email: matti.jarvela@oulu.fi.
Vesa Kiviniemi, Email: vesa.kiviniemi@oulu.fi.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
All computations were conducted with preexisting FSL, AFNI, MATLAB, and RStudio functions as described in Materials and Methods section. https://github.com/mattijar/OFNI/blob/main/Orexin_Effect_on_Physiological_Pulsations_of_the_Human_Brain/code_combined Code available at GitHub (83). The individual data from this study cannot be shared because of privacy issues of clinical data. Data available upon request from the corresponding author for research only after ethical approval for the specific study.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Nedergaard M., Goldman S. A., Glymphatic failure as a final common pathway to dementia. Science 370, 50–56 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jessen N. A., Munk A. S. F., Lundgaard I., Nedergaard M., The glymphatic system: A beginner’s guide. Neurochem. Res. 40, 2583–2599 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iliff J. J., et al. , A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 147ra111 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mestre H., et al. , Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nat. Commun. 9, 4878 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ringstad G., Eide P. K., Cerebrospinal fluid tracer efflux to parasagittal dura in humans. Nat. Commun. 11, 354 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Albayram M. S., et al. , Non-invasive MR imaging of human brain lymphatic networks with connections to cervical lymph nodes. Nat. Commun. 13, 203 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Agarwal N., Carare R. O., Cerebral vessels: An overview of anatomy, physiology, and role in the drainage of fluids and solutes. Front. Neurol. 11, 611485 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bakker E. N. T. P., Naessens D. M. P., VanBavel E., Paravascular spaces: Entry to or exit from the brain? Exp. Physiol. 104, 1013–1017 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Diem A. K., Carare R. O., Weller R. O., Bressloff N. W., A control mechanism for intra-mural peri-arterial drainage via astrocytes: How neuronal activity could improve waste clearance from the brain. PLoS One 13, e0205276 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eide P. K., Vinje V., Pripp A. H., Mardal K.-A., Ringstad G., Sleep deprivation impairs molecular clearance from the human brain. Brain 144, 863–874 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mestre H., Mori Y., Nedergaard M., The brain’s glymphatic system: Current controversies. Trend Neurosci. 43, 458–466 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ringstad G., et al. , Brain-wide glymphatic enhancement and clearance in humans assessed with MRI. JCI Insight 3, e121537 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fultz N. E., et al. , Coupled electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep. Science 366, 628–631 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dreha-Kulaczewski S., et al. , Identification of the upward movement of human CSF in vivo and its relation to the brain venous system. J. Neurosci. 37, 2395–2402 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kollmeier J. M., et al. , Deep breathing couples CSF and venous flow dynamics. Sci. Rep. 12, 2568 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iliff J. J., et al. , Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain. J. Neurosci. 33, 18190–18199 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bedussi B., Almasian M., De Vos J., VanBavel E., Bakker E. N., Paravascular spaces at the brain surface: Low resistance pathways for cerebrospinal fluid flow. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 38, 719–726 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kiviniemi V., et al. , Ultra-fast magnetic resonance encephalography of physiological brain activity—Glymphatic pulsation mechanisms? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36, 1033–1045 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Helakari H., et al. , Human NREM sleep promotes brain-wide vasomotor and respiratory pulsations. J. Neurosci. 42, 2503–2515 (2022), 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-21.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Helakari H., et al. , Effect of sleep deprivation and NREM sleep stage on physiological brain pulsations. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1275184 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berridge C. W., Schmeichel B. E., España R. A., Noradrenergic modulation of wakefulness/arousal. Sleep Med. Rev. 16, 187–197 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kjaerby C., et al. , Memory-enhancing properties of sleep depend on the oscillatory amplitude of norepinephrine. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1059–1070 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xie L., et al. , Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science 342, 373–377 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bassetti C. L. A., et al. , Narcolepsy—Clinical spectrum, aetiopathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 519–539 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roth T., et al. , Disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 9, 955–965 (2013), 10.5664/jcsm.3004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alloway C. E. D., Ogilvie R. D., Shapiro C. M., EEG spectral analysis of the sleep-onset period in narcoleptics and normal sleepers. Sleep 22, 191–203 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scammell T. E., Arrigoni E., Lipton J. O., Neural circuitry of wakefulness and sleep. Neuron 93, 747–765 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scammell T. E., Narcolepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2654–2662 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hagan J. J., et al. , Orexin A activates locus coeruleus cell firing and increases arousal in the rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 10911–10916 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Järvelä M., et al. , Increased very low frequency pulsations and decreased cardiorespiratory pulsations suggest altered brain clearance in narcolepsy. Commun. Med. 2, 122 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Assländer J., et al. , Single shot whole brain imaging using spherical stack of spirals trajectories. Neuroimage 73, 59–70 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huotari N., et al. , Sampling rate effects on resting state fMRI metrics. Front. Neurosci. 13, 279 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tuovinen T., et al. , The relative brain signal variability increases in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease but not in schizophrenia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 44, 1535–1549 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kananen J., et al. , Increased interictal synchronicity of respiratory related brain pulsations in epilepsy. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 42, 1840–1853 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Poltojainen V., et al. , Physiological instability is linked to mortality in primary central nervous system lymphoma: A case–control FMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 43, 4030–4044 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mahon P., Greene B. R., Lynch E. M., McNamara B., Shorten G. D., Can state or response entropy be used as a measure of sleep depth? Anaesthesia 63, 1309–1313 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hou F., et al. , Changes in EEG permutation entropy in the evening and in the transition from wake to sleep. Sleep 44, zsaa226 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Duyn J. H., Steady state effects in fast gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 37, 559–568 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Von Schulthess G. K., Higgins C. B., Blood flow imaging with MR: Spin-phase phenomena. Radiology 157, 687–695 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Penzel T., Kantelhardt J. W., Lo C.-C., Voigt K., Vogelmeier C., Dynamics of heart rate and sleep stages in normals and patients with sleep apnea. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, S48–S53 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raitamaa L., et al. , Association of body-mass index with physiological brain pulsations across adulthood—A fast fMRI study. Int. J. Obes. 48, 1011–1018 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Biswal B., Zerrin Yetkin F., Haughton V. M., Hyde J. S., Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar mri. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Intaglietta M., Vasomotion and flowmotion: Physiological mechanisms and clinical evidence. Vasc. Med. Rev. 1, 101–112 (1990). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kiviniemi V., et al. , Slow vasomotor fluctuation in fMRI of anesthetized child brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 44, 373–378 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shawn Yang H.-C., et al. , Coupling between cerebrovascular oscillations and CSF flow fluctuations during wakefulness: An fMRI study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 42, 1091–1103 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.van Veluw S. J., et al. , Vasomotion as a driving force for paravascular clearance in the awake mouse brain. Neuron 105, 549–561.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bojarskaite L., et al. , Sleep cycle-dependent vascular dynamics in male mice and the predicted effects on perivascular cerebrospinal fluid flow and solute transport. Nat. Commun. 14, 953 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hauglund N. L., et al. , Norepinephrine-mediated slow vasomotion drives glymphatic clearance during sleep. Cell 188, 606–622.e17 (2025), 10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Edlow B. L., et al. , Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 71, 531–546 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Saper C. B., Fuller P. M., Pedersen N. P., Lu J., Scammell T. E., Sleep state switching. Neuron 68, 1023–1042 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Osorio-Forero A., et al. , Noradrenergic circuit control of non-REM sleep substates. Curr. Biol. 31, 5009–5023.e7 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bourgin P., et al. , Hypocretin-1 modulates rapid eye movement sleep through activation of locus coeruleus neurons. J. Neurosci. 20, 7760–7765 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mahoney C. E., Cogswell A., Koralnik I. J., Scammell T. E., The neurobiological basis of narcolepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 83–93 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sateia M. J., International classification of sleep disorders-third edition. Chest 146, 1387–1394 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Drissi N. M., et al. , Structural anomaly in the reticular formation in narcolepsy type 1, suggesting lower levels of neuromelanin. Neuroimage: Clin. 23, 101875 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gabelle A., et al. , Reduced brain amyloid burden in elderly patients with narcolepsy type 1. Ann. Neurol. 85, 74–83 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Korte N., et al. , Noradrenaline released from locus coeruleus axons contracts cerebral capillary pericytes via α 2 adrenergic receptors. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 43, 1142–1152 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Järvelä M., et al. , Lag analysis of fast fMRI reveals delayed information flow between the default mode and other networks in narcolepsy. Cereb. Cortex. Commun. 1, tgaa073 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Drissi N. M., et al. , Altered brain microstate dynamics in adolescents with narcolepsy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 369 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dreha-Kulaczewski S., et al. , Inspiration is the major regulator of human CSF flow. J. Neurosci. 35, 2485–2491 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fukunaga M., et al. , Large-amplitude, spatially correlated fluctuations in BOLD fMRI signals during extended rest and early sleep stages. Magn. Reson. Imag. 24, 979–992 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Song C., Boly M., Tagliazucchi E., Laufs H., Tononi G., fMRI spectral signatures of sleep. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2016732119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bouvy W. H., et al. , Assessment of blood flow velocity and pulsatility in cerebral perforating arteries with 7-T quantitative flow MRI. NMR Biomed. 29, 1295–1304 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jorgensen L. G., Perko G., Secher N. H., Regional cerebral artery mean flow velocity and blood flow during dynamic exercise in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 73, 1825–1830 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stolz E., Kaps M., Kern A., Babacan S. S., Dorndorf W., Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography of intracranial veins and sinuses in adults: Reference data from 130 volunteers. Stroke 30, 1070–1075 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Battal B., et al. , Cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging by using phase-contrast MR technique. Br. J. Radiol. 84, 758–765 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tuovinen T., et al. , The variability of functional MRI brain signal increases in Alzheimer’s disease at cardiorespiratory frequencies. Sci. Rep. 10, 21559 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zahneisen B., et al. , Single shot concentric shells trajectories for ultra fast fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 68, 484–494 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hugger T., et al. , Fast undersampled functional magnetic resonance imaging using nonlinear regularized parallel image reconstruction. PLoS One 6, e28822 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zahneisen B., et al. , Quantification and correction of respiration induced dynamic field map changes in fMRI using 3D single shot techniques: Respiration induced field map dynamics. Magn. Reson. Med. 71, 1093–1102 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Korhonen V., et al. , Synchronous multiscale neuroimaging environment for critically sampled physiological analysis of brain function: Hepta-scan concept. Brain Connect. 4, 677–689 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jenkinson M., et al. , FSL. Neuroimage 62, 782–790 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cox R. W., AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162–173 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Allen P. J., Polizzi G., Krakow K., Fish D. R., Lemieux L., Identification of EEG events in the MR scanner: The problem of pulse artifact and a method for its subtraction. Neuroimage 8, 229–239 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Allen P. J., Josephs O., Turner R., A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage 12, 230–239 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kleiger R. E., Stein P. K., Bigger J. T., Heart rate variability: Measurement and clinical utility. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 10, 88–101 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nunan D., Sandercock G. R. H., Brodie D. A., A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults: Review of short-term HRV values. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 33, 1407–1417 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vanoli E., et al. , Heart rate variability during specific sleep stages: A comparison of healthy subjects with patients after myocardial infarction. Circulation 91, 1918–1922 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Immanuel S., Teferra M. N., Baumert M., Bidargaddi N., Heart rate variability for evaluating psychological stress changes in healthy adults: A scoping review. Neuropsychobiology 82, 187–202 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Smith S., Nichols T., Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 44, 83–98 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stefani M. A., et al. , Anatomic variations of anterior cerebral artery cortical branches. Clin. Anat. 13, 231–236 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Larson A. S., Lanzino G., Brinjikji W., Variations of intracranial dural venous sinus diameters from birth to 20 years of age: An MRV-based study. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 41, 2351–2357 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Järvelä M., et al. , Repository for Orexin Effect on Physiological Pulsations of the Human Brain. GitHub. https://github.com/mattijar/OFNI/blob/main/Orexin_Effect_on_Physiological_Pulsations_of_the_Human_Brain/code_combined. Deposited 3 July 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
Dataset S02 (XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
All computations were conducted with preexisting FSL, AFNI, MATLAB, and RStudio functions as described in Materials and Methods section. https://github.com/mattijar/OFNI/blob/main/Orexin_Effect_on_Physiological_Pulsations_of_the_Human_Brain/code_combined Code available at GitHub (83). The individual data from this study cannot be shared because of privacy issues of clinical data. Data available upon request from the corresponding author for research only after ethical approval for the specific study.




