Abstract
Background
Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen worldwide. During the current invasion of Ukraine, reports of infections caused by this organism have proliferated. Here, we provide a phenotypic and genotypic analysis of A. baumannii associated with the conflict.
Methods
Between March 2022 and September 2023, 68 A. baumannii strains were cultured from wounded Ukrainian service members in three hospitals in west-central Ukraine. Antibiotic susceptibility and WGS were performed on all isolates.
Results
Strains encompassed eight different STs, including the emerging ST78 (and its single locus variant ST1077) and globally distributed ST2 lineages, with ST19 being the most common (25%). Fifty strains carried at least one acquired carbapenemase (blaOXA-23 or blaOXA-72), with seven strains carrying both. Overall, susceptibility ranged from 0% (fluoroquinolones) to 100% (SUL/durlobactam) and all strains had CST MICs <1 mg/mL. Notably, all but one ST2 isolates were resistant to FDC, and this correlated with the presence of the blaPER-1 or blaPER-7 ESBL genes. In contrast, 8 of 13 ST78 were FDC non-susceptible, but non-susceptibility was correlated with the disruption of the pirA siderophore receptor gene by ISAba35. Finally, passage in MEM of one strain for 8 days resulted in a mutation of the blaGES-11 ESBL to the blaGES-14 carbapenemase.
Conclusions
Sampling of A. baumannii strains infecting injured Ukrainian soldiers revealed the predominance of known (ST2) and emerging (ST19, ST78) lineages carrying carbapenemases. Antibiotic resistance was broad, including the recently approved catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin, FDC, highlighting the immense treatment challenges faced by medical personnel during this ongoing conflict.
Introduction
Despite their widespread presence in the environment, bacteria from the genus Acinetobacter were largely absent from medical studies until the 1980s, when multiple reports highlighting their prevalence in hospitals and their potential to cause significant medical problems began to emerge.1 The role of Acinetobacter baumannii as a nosocomial pathogen became more evident during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, with numerous infections in wounded patients treated in military facilities.2 Notably, these pathogens exhibited high antimicrobial resistance, including the emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains.3 Since then, A. baumannii has been identified as a global problem,4 and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii has been designated as a critical pathogen for the research and development of new antibiotics by the WHO (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461; last accessed February 2025).
After the start of the war in eastern Ukraine in 2014, A. baumannii became a common pathogen cultured from combat wounds, with most isolates being multidrug resistant (MDR).5,6 A subsequent genetic analysis of these isolates revealed they belonged to five different STs, including global ST1 and ST2 carrying a variety of Class D carbapenemases, as well as more regional strains such as ST19, ST78 and ST400.7 Following the full-scale invasion by Russia in 2022, the significant increase in casualties once again prompted a rise in A. baumannii wound infections in Ukraine hospitals. In parallel, reports of A. baumannii being cultured from Ukrainian patients admitted to European hospitals were also published, including strains belonging to ST2 and ST78.8–12
We recently reported on the temporal evolution of bacterial species from war-related injuries between 2014 and 2023.13 In this study, we provide a subsequent comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis of the 68 A. baumannii strains, including their susceptibility to newer antimicrobials.
Methods
Bacteriological methods
From March 2022 to September 2023, bacteriological swabs were taken from combat-related injuries of 171 patients who were treated at three definitive care hospitals (NATO ROLE III-IV) in central Ukraine. The collection of wound exudate was performed using the BD BBL Culture Swab Plus collection and transport swabs (Becton Dickson, USA). Pure cultures were isolated from the swabs using two nutrient media: tryptic soy agar and chromogenic agar for Acinetobacter (Graso Biotech, Poland). The sampling included male soldiers with evident signs of surgical wound infection from whom swabs were collected within 12 h of admission during their initial surgical examination with wound bandage opening. Only extremity wounds were included in the sampling. On average, these individuals had been injured 6.2 ± 3.9 days prior to swabbing and had been transferred through four to five evacuation hospitals ranging from NATO Level II to III before arriving at the final facility.
In total 68 strains of A. baumannii bacteria were isolated and identified (Table S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC-AMR Online). Duplicate strains from the same infection source were excluded. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was initially performed in hospital laboratories via the disk diffusion method according to the EUCAST with Updates and Supplements.
Additional phenotypic characterization of isolates
All isolates were sent to the Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN) at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in the USA, where they underwent additional AST on the Vitek2 with Cards N808 and XN-32. MICs of FDC (Shionogi Pharma, Japan) and SUL-durlobactam (SUL/DUR, Entasis Therapeutics Inc., USA) were determined in triplicate using broth microdilution (BMD) with CLSI guidelines14 at concentrations ranging from ≤0.25 to 128 mg/L for FDC and ≤0.125 to 64 mg/L for SUL/DUR (with DUR at a fix concentration of 4 mg/L). CST MICs were determined in triplicate using the Sensititre Automated AST System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) and a customized Sensititre plate with concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 16 mg/L. Breakpoints were determined using CLSI recommendations.15 Strains were defined as MDR or XDR using a modification of the definitions proposed by Magiorakos et al.16 based on the 14 antibiotics (from 11 categories) tested (Table S1). Isolates non-susceptible to ≥1 agent in ≥3 of the 11 antimicrobial categories were classified as MDR and isolates non-susceptible to ≥1 agent in at least 8 of the 11 antimicrobial categories were classified as XDR.
WGS, core genome MLST, SNP calling and phylogenetic analysis
WGS of all isolates was performed on an Illumina MiSeq benchtop instrument as previously described.17 Briefly, DNA was extracted using the DNeasy UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and libraries were constructed using the KAPA HyperPlus Library preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Libraries were quantified using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit—Illumina/Bio-Rad iCycler™ (Roche Diagnostics) on a CFX96 real-time cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Libraries were normalized to 2 nM, pooled, denatured and diluted to a final concentration of 16 pM.
Genomes were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq platform with the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600 cycles; 2 × 300 bp). Kraken2 v2.1.218 was used for initial taxonomic assignment and to screen for contamination. De novo draft genome assemblies were produced using Shovill v1.1.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill) with coverage estimates generated using BBmap v38.96. Minimum thresholds for contig size and coverage were set at 200 bp and 49.5+, respectively. In cases where the Kraken2-derived taxonomic assignment was ambiguous, the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB)19 was used via the GTDB-Tk v2.4.0.20 Genomes were annotated using Bakta v.1.10.4 (https://github.com/oschwengers/bakta). Antimicrobial resistance genes were annotated using a combination of ARIBA v2.14.621 and AMRFinderPlus v3.12.8).22 MLST assignment was performed using mlst v2.22.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst) using the Pasteur scheme.23
Finally, genome assemblies were used as input for Roary v3.13.0 (https://sanger-pathogens.github.io/Roary/) and an SNP-based alignment of core genes was generated. Recombination was filtered from the alignment using Gubbins v2.4.1 (https://github.com/nickjcroucher/gubbins) and a maximum-likelihood tree was generated with RAxML-NG (v1.1) (https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng) using the GTR+G (50 parsimony, 50 random) model 100 random bootstrap replicates. The tree was imported in iTOL (v6.8.1)24 for visualization with metadata.
Serial passage of A. baumannii in the presence of MEM
MRSN 122177, a carbapenemase-negative but MEM intermediate strain was selected for further analysis. The strain was initially grown overnight in 20 mL of Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) at 37°C with shaking in 50 mL conical tubes with MEM at a final concentration of 2 mg/L. Of the resulting growth, 100 µL was then used to inoculate fresh MHB and the A. baumannii serially passaged in increasing two-fold concentrations of MEM to 32 mg/L over a period of 8 days. No further growth was recorded at higher concentrations and the resulting strain was analysed using WGS.
Results and discussion
Phenotypic characterization of isolates
Of the 68 of A. baumannii strains in this study, 55 (95.6%) were MDR, with 12 (17.6%) also being classified as XDR (Figure 1). Notably, all isolates were non-susceptible to the fluoroquinolones, with 97.1%, 86.7% and 76.4% also being resistant to TZP, SAM and SXT, respectively. Similarly high levels of resistance were noted for the aminoglycosides (∼60%) and the β-lactams, including the carbapenems (76.5%). Notably, 25% were also resistant to the recently approved catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin, FDC (see below for details).25 In contrast, only two antibiotics demonstrated broad activity, CST and the recently approved combination therapy SUL/DUR (Table S1).26
Figure 1.
Midpoint-rooted, maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the core genome of 68 A. baumannii strains collected from three hospitals in Ukraine, between March 2022 and September 2023. ST, hospital of origin, date of collection, culture type, and presence (closed symbol) or absence (open symbol) of selected antimicrobial resistance genes (circle) and phenotypic resistance to select antibiotics (square) are indicated. Serial isolates (same patients) are indicated with superscript letters next to the isolate name.
Two emerging lineages of A. baumannii ST19
A. baumannii ST19 was the largest clonal group identified in this study, comprising 23.5% of all isolates cultured. Fifteen of 16 isolates carried a Class D carbapenemase, either blaOXA-23 (n = 5) or blaOXA-72 (n = 10) (Figure 1). We recently showed that A. baumannii ST19 carrying blaOXA-23 form a distinct sub-lineage to those with blaOXA-72 and that both lineages have recently emerged in Georgia and Ukraine.27 In that study, long-read sequencing revealed that blaOXA-72 was encoded on an R3-type plasmid, while two identical copies of blaOXA-23 were found, one on an RP-type plasmid and the other in the chromosome.27 In this study, all isolates carrying blaOXA-23 were only cultured from patients receiving care in Hospital 1 (Figure 1), while all but one (MRSN 122249) carrying blaOXA-72 were cultured from patients in Hospitals 2 and 3. All ST19 isolates were susceptible to CST (MICs < 1 mg/L), FDC (MICs ≤ 4 mg/L) and the aminoglycosides, GEN and TOB (<4 mg/L).
Clonal expansion of A. baumannii ST78 and its single locus variant ST1077
Thirteen isolates belonged to ST78 and a further 11 belonged to its single locus variant (SLV), ST1077. All 11 ST1077 isolates formed a cluster of highly genetically related isolates (distinct by only 0–18 SNPs) that formed a distinct branch with the more genetically diverse ST78 (Figure 1). All isolates in both clonal groups carried the blaOXA-72 carbapenemase, but seven ST1077 isolates had also acquired blaOXA-23. In addition, all but two isolates carried the armA 16S methyltransferase gene, and this clade also exclusively carried the ESBL gene blaCTX-M-115, a hallmark of the ST78 clade.28 Though both ST78 and ST1077 displayed both MDR and XDR phenotypes, the exclusive resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the ST78 isolates can be attributed to the presence of sul2, which is absent in the ST1077 isolates. All ST78 isolates were susceptible to CST and SUL/DUR but just 5 of the 13 isolates were susceptible to FDC (MICs, Figure 1). A comprehensive analysis of the genomes revealed that the pirA gene in all eight FDC resistant isolates was disrupted by an IS, predicted to result in a non-functional PirA siderophore receptor. In contrast, the gene was intact in all five FDC-susceptible isolates (Figure 1). Disruption of pirA by ISAba35, and truncation of PirA due to pirA mutations, have previously been shown to confer FDC resistance in A. baumannii.29,30 In contrast, all 13 isolates had identical pbp3, piuA, baeR and baeS genes, indicating that FDC resistance in this clade was likely mediated via loss of the PirA receptor.
ST78 belongs to International Clone 6 (IC6) and have acquired the moniker ‘The Italian clone’ due to their first being isolated there in the mid-2000s.31 Since then, the lineage has been sporadically described in Europe,32,33 though an association with patients treated in Russia has also been reported.28,34 More recently, ST78 and ST1077 have been routinely cultured from injured Ukrainian service members both before5,7 and after13 the full-scale invasion in 2022, as well as among Ukrainian patients receiving care in hospitals in Germany and Denmark.11,35 These reports and our data suggest that this lineage and its emerging SLV ST1077 is likely endemic in Ukraine and further surveillance for this emerging clonal group is warranted.
Inter-hospital spread of global clone ST2
Twelve isolates from 11 patients were assigned to ST2, the most common lineage of A. baumannii worldwide and strongly associated with carbapenemase production.36 In agreement, 9 of the 12 isolates carried a carbapenemase, either blaOXA-23 (n = 7) or blaOXA-72 (n = 2) (Figure 1). Overall, the isolates could be separated into two sub-lineages: one comprising four blaPER-1-carrying strains, two of which also carried blaOXA-72, and another sub-lineage comprising the seven blaOXA-23-containing strains (Figure 1) in addition to armA and the ESBL blaPER-7. Notably, the latter group consisted of highly genetically related isolates (distinct by only 1–14 SNPs) cultured from patients across all three hospitals between May 2022 and July 2023, suggesting that this lineage may be endemic in this area.
All isolates were susceptible to CST and SUL/DUR, but 11 of the 12 isolates were resistant to FDC, with MICs of 64 and 128 mg/L for all 11 isolates. Recently, Poirel et al. have shown that the presence of PER enzymes, and to a lesser extent NDM, results in high level FDC resistance in A. baumannii, and the presence of PER-1 and PER-7 in our strains likely accounts for the observed FDC resistance.37 In support of this, MRSN 122444 is the only isolate not carrying a blaPER gene and is susceptible to FDC (Figure 1; MIC of 0.5 mg/L) and the pbp3, piuA, pirA, baeR and baeS genes are identical in all strains.
Conversion of GES11 (ESBL) to GES14 (carbapenemase) in ST400
Ten A. baumannii strains belonging to ST400 were recovered from 10 patients across two hospitals between March 2022 and May 2023, and none carried a carbapenemase (Figure 1). Three pairs of isolates were nearly genetically identical (MRSN 122142 and −122157 from hospital 3 distinct by 11 SNPs, MRSN 122227 and −122130 from Hospitals 1 and 3 distinct by nine SNPs; and MRSN 122247 and −122216 from Hospital 1 distinct by only six SNPs), suggestive of recent nosocomial transmission events. The remaining isolates were more distantly genetically related (distinct by 58–114 SNPs), suggestive of a more ancient common ancestor in Ukraine hospitals. Seven isolates carried blaGES-11, a variant of the ESBL blaGES-1 gene that confers the ESBL phenotype and also reduced susceptibility to carbapenems.38 This was confirmed by antibiotic susceptibility testing, which showed that all GES-carrying isolates had elevated MICs to IPM compared with their GES-negative relatives (MIC of 1–2 compared with <0.25 mg/L), and that only GES-carrying isolates had intermediate susceptibility to MEM (MIC of 4 compared with 0.5 mg/L).
Because all GES-carrying ST400 isolates had intermediate resistance to MEM, we wanted to examine the effects of MEM exposure on MICs. Previous studies have shown that related strains of A. baumannii from Turkey, Gaza and Egypt carried either GES-11 and GES-14 (a single loci variant of GES-11 due to a Gly170Ser substitution) on the same Class 1 integron structure, suggesting a common ancestor.39,40 Therefore, we selected the MRSN 122177 strain, an ST400 isolate that carried the blaGES-11 ESBL, for passage on increasing concentrations of MEM. The strain was initially intermediate to MEM (MIC = 4 mg/L) and after passage for 8 days on increasing concentrations of MEM, the MICs had increased to 32 mg/L, with a corresponding increase in IPM MICs from 2 mg/L (susceptible) to >32 mg/L (resistant). WGS revealed that increased resistance to both carbapenems could be traced to a single non-synonymous point mutation within blaGES-11 that resulted in the canonical Gly170Ser substitution resulting in the GES-14 carbapenemase.40
Previously, ST400 has been cultured from Ukrainian service members injured in eastern Ukraine prior to the 2022 invasion, but none of the isolates from that study carried blaGES.7 More recently, Fursova et al. described an ST400 strain cultured in 2018 from the glioma of a 58-year-old woman at a Moscow neurosurgery ICU.34 However, unlike the strains in this study, their isolate carried blaPER-1 and blaGES-1. Other sporadic detections of this clone have been described in Germany41 and Brazil,42 but the true distribution of this emerging clone remains obscure.
Sporadic detection of other A. baumannii lineages
Six additional isolates from five patients were also cultured during the period of this study. Two ST1 isolates carrying the blaOXA-23 carbapenemase were cultured from the same patient at Hospital 1 in May 2023, and both isolates were genetically identical. Similarly, in April 2023, a single ST15 isolate carrying no major antibiotic resistance genes was cultured from a patient in Hospital 3. Finally, three ST79 isolates were cultured from the war wounds of three separate patients: one in Hospital 3 in May 2022 and two from patients in Hospital 1 in April and May 2023 (Figure 1).
Conclusions
In the context of traumatic epidemics, such as wars, additional favourable conditions for the proliferation of MDR organisms are created, which is confirmed by our results. In our study, all but two isolates were MDR, almost triple the rates observed early in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.43 This disappointing dynamic can be explained by the force majeure of the medical care system in a large-scale war, which complicates the implementation of infection control measures.44 Carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii, particularly those carrying blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72, were found across all three hospitals, with just CST and SUL/DUR demonstrating broad coverage. The ultimate source of these isolates remains to be determined, but lessons learned during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts have emphasized the essential need for robust surveillance and screening of patients upon admittance to hospitals.45 Studies during these conflicts indicated that it was unlikely that wounds were being colonized at the time of injury due to the lack of MDR bacteria upon initial trauma.46,47 Instead, it has been postulated that nosocomial transmission was responsible,48 as recently confirmed for a clone of ST1 A. baumannii cultured from 30 patients at a major US military hospital during this period.49
Controlling and preventing the spread of these pathogens is challenging, but an aggressive approach that included hand hygiene, contact barrier precautions, patient and staff cohorting, chlorhexidine oral care, reducing the duration and spectrum of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, education and command emphasis were instrumental in reducing the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rate (VAP per 1000 ventilator-days) from 60.6 to 11 in just 6 months.50 Adherence to these strict protocols, combined with continued monitoring and surveillance, are essential to understand the transmission of these pathogens better and implement effective controls to prevent their spread.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The manuscript has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Defense Health Agency or the Department of Defense.
Contributor Information
V M Kondratiuk, Department of Emergency and Military Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.
Brendan T Jones, Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN), Bacterial Diseases Branch, CIDR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Ting L Luo, Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN), Bacterial Diseases Branch, CIDR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
N S Fomina, Department of Microbiology, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.
Francois Lebreton, Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN), Bacterial Diseases Branch, CIDR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Jason W Bennett, Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN), Bacterial Diseases Branch, CIDR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Patrick Mc Gann, Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN), Bacterial Diseases Branch, CIDR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
V P Kovalchuk, Department of Emergency and Military Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.
Funding
This study was partially funded by Defense Health Program (DHP) Operation & Maintenance (O&M) to P.M.G. and J.B. and the Ukrainian Ministry of Health (National Registration No. 0117U006903 and State Registration No. 0123U101070) to V.M.K. and V.P.K.
Transparency declarations
None to declare.
Ethical statement
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Pirogov Memorial Medical University (Minutes No. 3 from 3 April 2023).
Data availability
Genomic assemblies of all isolates analysed in this study are publicly available in the NCBI database under the BioProject numbers PRJNA1101874 and PRJNA1162747. The genome of MRSN 144391, the derivative of MRSN 122177 that acquired the Gly170Ser conversion from blaGES-11 to blaGES-14, has been deposited at NCBI under BioSample SAMN48893096.
Supplementary data
Table S1 is available as Supplementary data at JAC-AMR Online.
References
- 1. Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 939–51. 10.1038/nrmicro1789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Scott P, Deye G, Srinivasan A et al. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex infection in the US military health care system associated with military operations in Iraq. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 1577–84. 10.1086/518170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Acinetobacter baumannii infections among patients at military medical facilities treating injured U.S. service members, 2002–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53: 1063–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cain AK, Hamidian M. Portrait of a killer: uncovering resistance mechanisms and global spread of Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog 2023; 19: e1011520. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Higgins PG, Hagen RM, Podbielski A et al. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from war-injured patients from the eastern Ukraine. Antibiotics 2020; 9: 579. 10.3390/antibiotics9090579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Valentine KP, Viacheslav KM. Bacterial flora of combat wounds from eastern Ukraine and time-specified changes of bacterial recovery during treatment in Ukrainian military hospital. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10: 152. 10.1186/s13104-017-2481-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kondratiuk V, Jones BT, Kovalchuk V et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance in military hospital-associated bacteria from war injuries in the Eastern Ukraine conflict between 2014 and 2020. J Hosp Infect 2021; 112: 69–76. 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ljungquist O, Nazarchuk O, Kahlmeter G et al. Highly multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in war victims in Ukraine, 2022. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23: 784–6. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00291-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sandfort M, Hans JB, Fischer MA et al. Increase in NDM-1 and NDM-1/OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Germany associated with the war in Ukraine, 2022. Euro Surveill 2022; 27: 2200926. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.50.2200926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Stein C, Zechel M, Spott R et al. Multidrug-resistant isolates from Ukrainian patients in a German health facility: a genomic surveillance study focusing on antimicrobial resistance and bacterial relatedness. Infection 2023; 51: 1731–8. 10.1007/s15010-023-02061-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Stolberg RS, Hansen F, Porsbo LJ et al. Genotypic characterisation of carbapenemase-producing organisms obtained in Denmark from patients associated with the war in Ukraine. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2023; 34: 15–7. 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zwittink RD, Wielders CC, Notermans DW et al. Multidrug-resistant organisms in patients from Ukraine in the Netherlands, March to August 2022. Euro Surveill 2022; 27: 2200896. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.50.2200896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kovalchuk V, Kondratiuk V, McGann P et al. Temporal evolution of bacterial species and their antimicrobial resistance characteristics in wound infections of war-related injuries in Ukraine from 2014 to 2023. J Hosp Infect 2024; 152: 99–104. 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. CLSI . Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically—Twelfth Edition: M07. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 15. CLSI . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Thirty Fourth Edition: M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 268–81. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mc Gann PT, Lebreton F, Jones BT et al. Six extensively drug-resistant bacteria in an injured soldier, Ukraine. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29: 1692–5. 10.3201/eid2908.230567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 2019; 20: 257. 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50: D785–94. 10.1093/nar/gkab776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P et al. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2022; 38: 5315–6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hunt M, Mather AE, Sanchez-Buso L et al. ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genom 2017; 3: e000131. 10.1099/mgen.0.000131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Gonzalez-Escalona N et al. AMRFinderPlus and the reference gene catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 12728. 10.1038/s41598-021-91456-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A et al. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10034. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52: W78–82. 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Choi JJ, McCarthy MW. Cefiderocol: a novel siderophore cephalosporin. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2018; 27: 193–7. 10.1080/13543784.2018.1426745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Watkins RR, Bonomo RA. Sulbactam-durlobactam: a step forward in treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76: S163–5. 10.1093/cid/ciad093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Luo TL, Martin MJ, Kovalchuk V et al. Detection of carbapenemase producing Acinetobacter baumannii ST19 from Georgia and Ukraine carrying blaOXA-23, blaOXA-72, and/or blaNDM-5, December 2019 to June 2023. Euro Surveill 2024; 29: 2400259. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.24.2400259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pfeifer Y, Hunfeld KP, Borgmann S et al. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST78 with OXA-72 carbapenemase and ESBL gene blaCTX-M-115. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 1426–8. 10.1093/jac/dkv462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Alteri C, Teri A, Liporace MF et al. Transmission cluster of cefiderocol-non-susceptible carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in cefiderocol-naive individuals. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2024; 23: 104. 10.1186/s12941-024-00763-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Huang E, Thompson RN, Moon SH et al. Treatment-emergent cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is associated with insertion sequence ISAba36 in the siderophore receptor pirA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2024; 68: e0029024. 10.1128/aac.00290-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Giannouli M, Cuccurullo S, Crivaro V et al. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a tertiary care hospital in Naples, Italy, shows the emergence of a novel epidemic clone. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48: 1223–30. 10.1128/JCM.02263-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hamidian M, Maharjan RP, Farrugia DN et al. Genomic and phenotypic analyses of diverse non-clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strains reveals strain-specific virulence and resistance capacity. Microb Genom 2022; 8: 000765. 10.1099/mgen.0.000765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vuillemenot JB, Bour M, Beyrouthy R et al. Genomic analysis of CTX-M-115 and OXA-23/-72 co-producing Acinetobacter baumannii, and their potential to spread resistance genes by natural transformation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 1542–52. 10.1093/jac/dkac099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Fursova NK, Fursov MV, Astashkin EI et al. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii causing nosocomial meningitis in the neurological intensive care unit. Microorganisms 2023; 11: 2020. 10.3390/microorganisms11082020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Schultze T, Hogardt M, Velazquez ES et al. Molecular surveillance of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in Ukrainian patients, Germany, March to June 2022. Euro Surveill 2023; 28: 2200850. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.1.2200850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom 2019; 5: e000306. 10.1099/mgen.0.000306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Poirel L, Sadek M, Nordmann P. Contribution of PER-type and NDM-type beta-lactamases to cefiderocol resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65: e0087721. 10.1128/AAC.00877-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Moubareck C, Bremont S, Conroy MC et al. GES-11, a novel integron-associated GES variant in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 3579–81. 10.1128/AAC.00072-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bogaerts P, Naas T, El Garch F et al. GES extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Belgium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 4872–8. 10.1128/AAC.00871-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bonnin RA, Nordmann P, Potron A et al. Carbapenem-hydrolyzing GES-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 349–54. 10.1128/AAC.00773-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Eigenbrod T, Reuter S, Gross A et al. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii using WGS revealed missed transmission events in Germany from 2012–15. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74: 3473–80. 10.1093/jac/dkz360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cayo R, Rodrigues-Costa F, Matos AP et al. Identification of a new integron harboring blaIMP-10 in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 3687–9. 10.1128/AAC.04991-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Davis KA, Moran KA, McAllister CK et al. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter extremity infections in soldiers. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 1218–24. 10.3201/1108.050103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Pallett SJC, Boyd SE, Shea O et al. The contribution of human conflict to the development of antimicrobial resistance. Commun Med 2023; 3: 153. 10.1038/s43856-023-00386-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lesho E, Gleeson T, Summers A et al. Joint collaboration enhances infection control at home and abroad: the maiden voyage of the multidrug-resistant organism repository and surveillance network. Mil Med 2011; 176: 241–3. 10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ecker JA, Massire C, Hall TA et al. Identification of Acinetobacter species and genotyping of Acinetobacter baumannii by multilocus PCR and mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 2921–32. 10.1128/JCM.00619-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Yun HC, Murray CK, Roop SA et al. Bacteria recovered from patients admitted to a deployed U.S. military hospital in Baghdad, Iraq. Mil Med 2006; 171: 821–5. 10.7205/MILMED.171.9.821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Murray CK. Infectious disease complications of combat-related injuries. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: S358–64. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817e2ffc [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Luo TL, Harmer CJ, Lebreton F et al. Identification of an outbreak cluster of extensively antibiotic-resistant GC1 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in U.S. military treatment facilities. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11: e0046223. 10.1128/spectrum.00462-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Landrum ML, Murray CK. Ventilator associated pneumonia in a military deployed setting: the impact of an aggressive infection control program. J Trauma 2008; 64: S123–7. discussion S127–8. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816086dc [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Genomic assemblies of all isolates analysed in this study are publicly available in the NCBI database under the BioProject numbers PRJNA1101874 and PRJNA1162747. The genome of MRSN 144391, the derivative of MRSN 122177 that acquired the Gly170Ser conversion from blaGES-11 to blaGES-14, has been deposited at NCBI under BioSample SAMN48893096.

