Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1995 Apr;221(4):381–386. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199504000-00008

Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.

G R Jatzko 1, P H Lisborg 1, A M Pertl 1, H M Stettner 1
PMCID: PMC1234587  PMID: 7726673

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To answer the question whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC) is safer in terms of complications, the authors evaluated complications relating to 1440 cholecystectomies performed by the same surgeons in a retrospective study. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A definite pronouncement on whether LC truly is superior to OC is not possible because prospective trials are burdened with problems of recruitment. METHODS: After the introduction of LC at the authors' institution in April 1991 and until October 1993, 94.6% (700/740) of all patients admitted for operation because of symptomatic gallstone disease could be treated laparoscopically. The clinical records of the last 700 patients who underwent OC before the introduction of LC were re-evaluated with regard to both overall complications and the grade of complication (severity grade 1-4). A comparison of the incidence of complications relating to the two surgical methods, age, sex, common bile duct stones, acute cholecystitis, concomitant illness, Apache score, and length of operation was calculated by multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model. RESULTS: The total rate of complications in the OC group was 7.7%, with five postoperative deaths, compared with 1.9% and one postoperative death in the LC group. Multivariate analysis for OC revealed that both old age (p = 0.014) and the existence of common bile duct stones (p = 0.02) had independent prognostic influences in increasing the overall complication rate, whereas only old age (p = 0.019) influenced the overall complication rate after LC. Multivariate analysis of all cholecystectomies (n = 1440) showed that the overall complication rate was influenced independently by OC as a detrimental factor. CONCLUSIONS: As this analysis emphasizes, LC can be performed safely with an overall complication rate that is distinctly lower than that of OC. For selective surgery, LC is undoubtedly superior to OC and can probably be seen as a new "gold standard" for cholecystectomies.

Full text

PDF
384

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attwood S. E., Hill A. D., Mealy K., Stephens R. B. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Nov;74(6):397–400. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barkun J. S., Barkun A. N., Sampalis J. S., Fried G., Taylor B., Wexler M. J., Goresky C. A., Meakins J. L. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet. 1992 Nov 7;340(8828):1116–1119. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93148-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron J. L., Gadacz T. R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991 Jan;213(1):1–2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199101000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clavien P. A., Sanabria J. R., Mentha G., Borst F., Buhler L., Roche B., Cywes R., Tibshirani R., Rohner A., Strasberg S. M. Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors. Ann Surg. 1992 Dec;216(6):618–626. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199212000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clavien P. A., Sanabria J. R., Strasberg S. M. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992 May;111(5):518–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dent T. L. Training, credentialling, and granting of clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):399–403. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90607-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubois F., Icard P., Berthelot G., Levard H. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg. 1990 Jan;211(1):60–62. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199001000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilliland T. M., Traverso L. W. Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptoms. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jan;170(1):39–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glenn F. Choledochotomy in nonmalignant disease of the biliary tract. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 May;124(5):974–988. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grace P. A., Quereshi A., Coleman J., Keane R., McEntee G., Broe P., Osborne H., Bouchier-Hayes D. Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):160–162. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kakos G. S., Tompkins R. K., Turnipseed W., Zollinger R. M. Operative cholangiography during routine cholecystectomy: a review of 3,012 cases. Arch Surg. 1972 Apr;104(4):484–488. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1972.04180040098017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin I. G., Holdsworth P. J., Asker J., Baltas B., Glinatsis M. T., Sue-Ling H., Gibson J., Johnston D., McMahon M. J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a routine procedure for gallstones: results of an 'all-comers' policy. Br J Surg. 1992 Aug;79(8):807–810. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McEntee G., Grace P. A., Bouchier-Hayes D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the common bile duct. Br J Surg. 1991 Apr;78(4):385–386. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McSherry C. K. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg. 1989 Sep;158(3):174–178. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90246-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perissat J., Collet D., Belliard R. Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment--cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy, and lithotripsy. Our own technique. Surg Endosc. 1990;4(1):1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00591401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peters J. H., Ellison E. C., Innes J. T., Liss J. L., Nichols K. E., Lomano J. M., Roby S. R., Front M. E., Carey L. C. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991 Jan;213(1):3–12. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199101000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peters J. H., Gibbons G. D., Innes J. T., Nichols K. E., Front M. E., Roby S. R., Ellison E. C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1991 Oct;110(4):769–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reddick E. J., Olsen D. O. Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1990 Nov;160(5):485–489. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trede M., Schaupp W. Ein Plädoyer für die Cholecystektomie--"Gold-Standard" der Gallensteintherapie. Chirurg. 1990 May;61(5):365–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zucker K. A., Bailey R. W., Gadacz T. R., Imbembo A. L. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90358-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES