Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1996 Jun;223(6):688–700. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199606000-00007

Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy.

J H Yim 1, P Barton 1, B Weber 1, D Radford 1, J Levy 1, B Monsees 1, F Flanagan 1, J A Norton 1, G M Doherty 1
PMCID: PMC1235213  PMID: 8645042

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the differences between stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNBx) and needle localization surgical biopsy (NLBx) in cost and treatment course for patients with mammographically detected breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy is a reproducible and reliable alternative to surgical biopsy for histologic diagnosis of mammographic lesions. METHODS: Records from 52 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed by SCNBx (n = 21) or NLBx (n = 31) over 2 years were reviewed. Episode-of-care costs were extracted from the Barnes Hospital billing system database. RESULTS: At the time of excision, surgical margins were statistically more frequently positive in patients treated with NLBx (55%) than patients treated with SCNBx (0%, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, patients in the NLBx group undergoing breast conservation surgery required re-excision more frequently (74%) than those in the SCNBx group (0%, p = 0.001). There were no complications in either group after the diagnostic procedure. All SCNBx results were correct in the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. The median cost of SCNBx was approximately $1000 less than the median cost of NLBx. This cost difference was carried through the definitive procedure, whether it was breast conservation or mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the advantage of SCNBx to diagnose breast cancer and definitive operative care at a single procedure. The preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer eliminated positive operative margins and procedures to re-excise breast tissue. The use of SCNBx also saved approximately $1000 per patient compared with the use of NLBx. Our data suggest that SCNBx is the diagnostic procedure of choice for mammographically detected cancers.

Full text

PDF
689

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cox C. E., Reintgen D. S., Nicosia S. V., Ku N. N., Baekey P., Carey L. C. Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy: an argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995 May;2(3):201–206. doi: 10.1007/BF02307024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cross M. J., Evans W. P., Peters G. N., Cheek J. H., Jones R. C., Krakos P. Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excisional biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995 May;2(3):195–200. doi: 10.1007/BF02307023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cyrlak D. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. Radiology. 1988 Sep;168(3):661–663. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.3.3406395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dowlatshahi K., Yaremko M. L., Kluskens L. F., Jokich P. M. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology. 1991 Dec;181(3):745–750. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.3.1947091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dronkers D. J. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology. 1992 Jun;183(3):631–634. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elvecrog E. L., Lechner M. C., Nelson M. T. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology. 1993 Aug;188(2):453–455. doi: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans W. P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Curr Opin Radiol. 1992 Oct;4(5):130–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gisvold J. J., Goellner J. R., Grant C. S., Donohue J. H., Sykes M. W., Karsell P. R., Coffey S. L., Jung S. H. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Apr;162(4):815–820. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.4.8140997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall F. M., Storella J. M., Silverstone D. Z., Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology. 1988 May;167(2):353–358. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.2.3282256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harter L. P., Curtis J. S., Ponto G., Craig P. H. Malignant seeding of the needle track during stereotaxic core needle breast biopsy. Radiology. 1992 Dec;185(3):713–714. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.3.1343569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hasselgren P. O., Hummel R. P., Georgian-Smith D., Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):836–842. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackman R. J., Nowels K. W., Shepard M. J., Finkelstein S. I., Marzoni F. A., Jr Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):91–95. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaelin C. M., Smith T. J., Homer M. J., Taback B., Azurin D., Schmid C. H., Weld L. Safety, accuracy, and diagnostic yield of needle localization biopsy of the breast performed using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Sep;179(3):267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kopans D. B. Review of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results in nonpalpable breast lesions. Radiology. 1993 Dec;189(3):665–666. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee C. H., Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jan;164(1):81–86. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindfors K. K., Rosenquist C. J. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness. Radiology. 1994 Jan;190(1):217–222. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mikhail R. A., Nathan R. C., Weiss M., Tummala R. M., Mullangi U. R., Lawrence L., Mukkamala A. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of mammographic breast lesions as a viable alternative to surgical biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994 Sep;1(5):363–367. doi: 10.1007/BF02303806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mokbel K., Ahmed M., Nash A., Sacks N. Re-excision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1995 Apr;58(4):225–232. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930580405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ngai J. H., Zelles G. W., Rumore G. J., Sawicki J. E., Godfrey R. S. Breast biopsy techniques and adequacy of margins. Arch Surg. 1991 Nov;126(11):1343–1347. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410350033005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parker S. H., Burbank F., Jackman R. J., Aucreman C. J., Cardenosa G., Cink T. M., Coscia J. L., Jr, Eklund G. W., Evans W. P., 3rd, Garver P. R. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994 Nov;193(2):359–364. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Parker S. H., Lovin J. D., Jobe W. E., Burke B. J., Hopper K. D., Yakes W. F. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology. 1991 Aug;180(2):403–407. doi: 10.1148/radiology.180.2.1648757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parker S. H., Lovin J. D., Jobe W. E., Luethke J. M., Hopper K. D., Yakes W. F., Burke B. J. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology. 1990 Sep;176(3):741–747. doi: 10.1148/radiology.176.3.2167501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schmidt R. A. Stereotactic breast biopsy. CA Cancer J Clin. 1994 May-Jun;44(3):172–191. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.44.3.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sickles E. A., Parker S. H. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions. Radiology. 1993 Aug;188(2):315–315. doi: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sullivan D. C. Needle core biopsy of mammographic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Mar;162(3):601–608. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tabar L., Fagerberg G., Chen H. H., Duffy S. W., Smart C. R., Gad A., Smith R. A. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer. 1995 May 15;75(10):2507–2517. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2507::aid-cncr2820751017>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tafra L., Guenther J. M., Giuliano A. E. Planned segmentectomy. A necessity for breast carcinoma. Arch Surg. 1993 Sep;128(9):1014–1020. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420210078010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES