Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Behav Immun. 2025 Jun 9;129:206–220. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2025.06.010

Prenatal opioid exposure and maternal HCV infection impair microglia development and function: a patient-specific in vitro model

Heather E True 1,2, Hami Hemati 2, Rebecca Geron 2, Brianna M Doratt 2, Delphine C Malherbe 2, Cynthia Cockerham 3, John O’Brien 3, Ilhem Messaoudi 2,#
PMCID: PMC12355481  NIHMSID: NIHMS2101021  PMID: 40499844

Abstract

Opioids are a class of pain-relieving drugs known to cross the placental and blood brain barriers, exposing the fetus in utero. Rates of opioid use disorder amongst pregnant individuals in the United States are on the rise, and intravenous routes of opioid administration are highly associated with hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Newborns with prenatal opioid exposure (POE) are more likely to be small for gestational age and have increased rates of neurodevelopmental delay. Microglia are brain-resident macrophages that originate from yolk-sac precursors that play critical role in neurodevelopment. However, our understanding of the impact of POE on microglia maturation and function remains limited due to the scarcity of adequate models. Here, we leveraged a model of induced microglia-like cells (iMGL) derived from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells to uncover the mechanisms underlying the impact of POE ± maternal HCV infection on microglia morphology, phenotype, function, and transcriptional profiles. Our study revealed that iMGL are closely related to primary microglia. iMGL derived from pregnancies with POE and maternal HCV infection exhibited an ameboid-like phenotype, characterized by smaller area/perimeter and diminished ramifications. This was accompanied by dysregulated expression of key microglia markers, impaired phagocytic capacity, but increased secretion of inflammatory mediators. Finally, transcriptional analysis of iMGL with and without stimulation by LPS revealed that POE ± maternal HCV infection desensitized iMGL to LPS stimulation. This immune tolerance of iMGL in utero was reflected by altered expression of genes important for neurological and fetal development, phagocytosis, and antimicrobial responses with POE ± maternal HCV infection. Overall, these findings highlight the utility of iMGLs as an accessible patient-specific model to study preconditioning and development of fetal microglia and provide insight into mechanisms underlying adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborns with POE in presence and absence of maternal HCV infection.

Keywords: Pregnancy, opioid, hepatitis C, microglia, neurodevelopment, transcriptome, morphology

1.1. INTRODUCTION

In 2023, there were an estimated 81,083 overdose deaths resulted from opioid exposure in the United States 1, largely driven by the influx of illicitly manufactured fentanyl 2. While the opioid crisis has received extensive national attention, opioid use in pregnancy and mechanisms underlying adverse fetal outcomes have been relatively understudied 3. Rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy have increased dramatically since 1999 and disproportionally impact rural areas of the country, particularly Kentucky and the surrounding Appalachian region 4. Opioids are a class of drugs known to cross the placental barrier, exposing the fetus in utero 5. Opioid exposed pregnancies are further commonly complicated by maternal hepatitis C (HCV) infection, which is associated with intravenous routes of drug administration 6. Chronic HCV infection results in a sustained proinflammatory environment 7, which may influence immune cell maturation 8. Indeed, prenatal opioid exposure (POE) has been linked to stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth (PTB), and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), predisposing surviving neonates to acute and long-term neurological deficits 916. In utero opioid exposure and NOWS is associated with cognitive, speech, and motor deficits; higher rates of behavioral difficulties; impaired executive function; and poor school performance 17. Furthermore, children with POE have smaller brains, a higher incidence of microstructural brain injuries, and lower scores on cognitive tests 14, 18, 19.

One proposed mechanism for how POE disrupts fetal brain development is by impairing microglia, resident macrophages of the central nervous system (CNS) 20. Microglia originate from myeloid progenitors originating from the fetal yolk sac early in embryonic development where they cross the blood-brain barrier and migrate throughout the developing CNS 21. Here, microglia are critical mediators of healthy neurodevelopment by regulating the differentiation of neuron precursor cells and refining synaptic circuits 22. As microglia mature, they acquire their characteristic ramified morphology and maintain healthy brain homeostasis through regulation of neuronal survival and activity, synaptic pruning, and myelination 23. Additionally, microglia play pivotal roles as immune sentinels of the brain and mediate neuronal repair 24. Microglia are morphologically diverse and actively modify the shape of their projections in response to stimuli 25. Thus, dysregulation of microglia development due to maternal environmental factors (such as toxins, infections, diet, or stress) can have lifelong consequences for offspring neurodevelopment 26.

Murine models of prenatal neuroinflammation by targeting microglia toll-like receptors (lipopolysaccharide, bacterial endotoxins, or poly:IC) have shown that prenatal exposures can sensitize or precondition microglia to subsequent, postnatal insults 27, 28. POE may mimic these effects, as opioids target opioid and toll-like receptors expressed by microglia 29. However, a consensus is lacking on whether opioids prime microglia towards an immune-tolerant (desensitized) or immune-trained (sensitized) phenotype 2931. This discrepancy is likely due to variations in model used, the dose, duration, timing of exposure in microglia development, and/or route of opioid administration, and the complex interplay between various opioids and various opioid receptors 32, 33. Additionally, ex vivo or in vivo studies of microglia function are limited to human post-mortem brain tissue or animal models 34, 35. Immortalized cell lines 36, primary isolated cell cultures 37, and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derived microglia-like cells 38 have been used in in vitro studies. However, these models present significant limitations, including reduced expression of key microglia genes, altered differentiation and phagocytosis, and increased expression of pro-inflammatory mediators 39, 40. Recent advancements in reducing the differences between in vitro and in vivo experiments include co-cultures with other CNS resident cells, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia, and patient-specific models of microglia function from peripheral blood 41, 42.

Here, we used a recently established model of patient-specific umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell (UCBMC)-derived microglia-like cells (iMGL) 43, 44, as UCBMCs and circulating fetal monocytes share erythromyeloid progenitor origins with microglia 45. To infer the impact of POE ± HCV on the functional landscape of microglia, we obtained UCBMC from opioid-naïve (control) and opioid-exposed (POE) neonates, with and without maternal HCV infection. Differentiation of iMGL from UCBMC was confirmed by morphology and phenotyping, as well as by comparison of iMGL transcriptional profiles with established UCBMC and primary microglia bulk RNA sequencing datasets. We further quantified morphological features of skeletonized, z-stacked, immunofluorescence images of single-iMGL using ImageJ software. Finally, we assessed the functional landscapes of iMGL using multiplex Luminex assay, phagocytosis assay, and bulk RNA sequencing.

1.2. METHODS

1.2.1. Ethics approval statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. (IRB# 43698 – Comprehensive Perinatal Substance Abuse Treatment)

1.2.2. Cohort characteristics

Umbilical cord blood samples were collected from participants with full-term, healthy pregnancies (N=12, controls) and those with prenatal opioid exposure (N=24, POE). Due to the high prevalence of HCV infection with intravenous drug use, we further stratified the POE group by HCV infection (N=12, POE HCV− and N=12 POE HCV+). Among those with positive HCV IgG, HCV viral loads were also measured in maternal blood collected at the time of delivery, indicating active HCV infection in 5 participants. HCV antibodies were not detected in any of the control participants. Other maternal and fetal characteristics were comparable among groups, including parity, maternal age, pre-pregnancy body-mass index (BMI), gestational age at delivery, fetal sex, and maternal race and ethnicity. Participant characteristics are summarized in (Table 1).

Table 1:

Cohort Characteristics

Control OUD HCV− Control vs OUD HCV− OUD HCV+ Control vs OUD HCV+ OUD HCV− vs OUD HCV+
  Number of enrollees 12 12 12
DSM-V score NA 8.67 ± 2.01 NA 9.58 ± 1.62 NA p=0.233
HCV IgG Antibody at Delivery (OD) 0.064 ± 0.04 0.01 ± 0.01 p=0.236 1.19 ± 0.42 p=<0.0001 p=<0.0001
Parity 2.2 ± 1.9 1.5 ± 0.8 p=0.280 2.3 ± 1.6 p=0.819 p=0.128
Maternal Age (years) 30.7 ± 6.2 29 ± 4.5 p=0.458 29.5 ± 5.1 p=0.619 p=0.800
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m 2 ) 30.36 ± 7.82 29.01 ± 5.92 p=0.641 29.15 ± 4.80 p=0.654 p=0.952
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 39.10 ± 1.43 39 ± 1.25 p=0.822 38.5 ± 0.73 p=0.586 p=0.7545
% Female newborn 50% 58.30% p=0.698 58.30% p=0.698 p=1
Race White 75% 100% 91.67%
Black 8.33% 0% 8.33%
Asian 8.33% 0% 0%
Mixed Race 8.33% 0% 0%
Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino 100% 100% 100%

1.2.3. Sample collection and processing

Umbilical cord blood samples were collected in EDTA vacutainer tubes (BD Biosciences). UCBMCs were isolated after whole-blood centrifugation over LymphoPrep in SepMate tubes following manufacturer protocols (STEMCELL Technologies). UCBMCs were cryopreserved using 10% DMSO/FBS and Mr. Frosty Nalgene freezing containers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at −80°C overnight and then transferred to a cryogenic unit until thawed and plated for induction to microglia outlined below in section 1.2.4.

1.2.4. Derivation of microglia-like cells (iMGL) from UCBMC

Induced microglia-like cells (iMGL) were derived from UCBMC using the protocol previously published by Sheridan et al.43, with minor adaptations. Briefly, frozen UCBMC were thawed, and 1.0e6 cells were plated per well of a 24-well tissue culture plate previously coated with poly-D-lysine (50μg/ml) per manufacturer’s instructions. 500μl of media containing RPMI 1640, 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin was added to each well, and placed in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2 for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the media was replaced with induction media containing RPMI 1640, 1% Glutamax, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 100 ng/ml IL-34 (Peprotech), and 10 ng/ml GM-CSF (Peprotech) and the plate returned to 37°C incubator with 5% CO2 for an additional 12 days. On day 13, post-seeding, media was replaced with fresh induction media and returned to the incubator for a final 24 hours. On day 14 post-seeding, the presence of iMGL was confirmed by the appearance of ramifications by microscopy and harvested using cell scrapers and immediately used for downstream experiments.

1.2.5. Phenotyping

Thawed UCBMC from newborns of full-term, healthy pregnancies (N=9) or iMGL (N=27, 9 Controls, 9 POE HCV−, and 9 POE HCV+) were thoroughly washed with FACS buffer, and stained with a cocktail of the following surface antibodies at a ratio of 1:20 in 50μl/sample of Brilliant Stain Buffer (BD Biosciences): CD14, HLA-DR, CD16, CX3CR1, CD45, CD11b, P2RY12, TMEM119, TREM2, CD68, CD40, CD163, CD115, and CD86 46, 47 as well as True-Stain Monocyte Block and Human TruStain FcX (Fc Receptor Blocking Solution, BioLegend, 1:20). After incubation for 30 minutes at 4°C, UCBMCs or the iMGL cell pellet was washed with FACS buffer, fixed for 2 hours (Tonbo fix/permeabilization solution, 1:3), permeabilized (Tonbo permeabilization buffer), and stained with PU.1, IBA.1, and IRF8 intranuclear antibodies at a ratio of 1:20, overnight 4°C. The next day, stained UCBMCs/iMGLs were washed with FACS buffer, ran on the Cytek Aurora flow cytometer (Cytek Biosciences, 5-laser; 355 nm, 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm) using the SpectroFlo Software v2.2.0.2. The cells were unmixed using stained beads with the autofluorescence extraction option enabled and extracted FCS files were analyzed using Flowjo 10.10.0 (Ashland, OR). Briefly, undesired events were removed by FlowAI 2.3.2 48. For supervised gating, cells expressing CD45+CD11b+P2RY12+TMEM119+ were designated as iMGL. The expression of surface and intracellular markers on UCBMCs/iMGL was then assessed.

1.2.6. Immunofluorescence staining

iMGL were differentiated in a 24-well plate on coverslips as described in section 1.2.4. On day 14, coverslips were carefully transferred to a new plate and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (BioLegend) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Following fixation, cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 minutes per wash. Cells were then permeabilized by incubating the coverslips in PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 20 minutes at room temperature. After two additional PBS washes, blocking was performed in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. Primary antibody IBA1 (1:1000, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical 019-19741) or TMEM119 (1:50, ThermoFisher PA5-119902) incubation was conducted overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber. The next day, cells were washed three times with blocking buffer (5% BSA-PBS) for 10 minutes each. Next, 0.5 μg/ml of secondary antibody Goat anti-Rabbit IgG-AlexaFluor Plus 594-Red (Invitrogen) in 1% BSA-PBS was added to cells and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark. To remove unbound antibodies, cells were washed an additional three times with PBS. Coverslips were then mounted onto glass slides using Vectashield® antifade mounting medium with DAPI (H-1200-10) and sealed with clear nail polish. Slides were allowed to dry overnight and stored at 4°C until imaging.

1.2.7. Morphology analysis

Images of IBA1-stained iMGL were captured at 40X magnification with a step size of 1 μm using z-stack acquisition parameters. Captured images were then analyzed using ImageJ software to identify pixels with the highest intensity at any position in a z-stack. The 8-bit images were further processed using ImageJ MicrogliaMorphology and its R package 49 with slight modifications tailored to in vitro microglia culture. Single-cell iMGL images were generated using the BioVoxxel Toolbox plugin. This semi-automated process provides recommended thresholding, and the highest quality threshold was selected to enhance the distinction between microglia ameboid and ramified forms. Skeletonization was then performed on the single cells, and fractal analysis was conducted using the FracLac plugin. Color coding of the images was achieved using the ColorByCluster feature. The resulting 27 morphology features were plotted to observe differences between the groups. These features were further processed using the MicrogliaMorphology R package and evaluated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis to capture cell heterogeneity and identify morphologies specific to each group.

1.2.8. Phagocytosis Assay

To quantify the phagocytic ability of UCB-derived microglia-like cells (iMGL), iMGLs (N=36, 12 Controls, 12 POE HCV−, and 12 POE HCV+) were incubated for 2 hours at 37°C in media containing 1 mg/mL pH-sensitive pHrodo E. coli BioParticles conjugates (ThermoFisher Scientific). Cell pellets were washed twice in FACS buffer, surface stained at 4°C with antibodies against CD2, CD20, CD45, CD14, HLA-DR, and P2RY12 at a ratio of 1:20, then resuspended in ice-cold FACS buffer. Samples were run using an Attune NxT and analyzed using FlowJo 10.10 software (Beckton Dickinson).

1.2.9. Luminex assay

Immune mediators in the supernatant of day-14 iMGL were measured using a custom 10-plex panel measuring levels of myeloid/microglia cell activation markers (IFNγ, IL-10, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP1α, and MIP1β) (Milliplex Human Cytokine/Chemokine/Growth Factor Panel A, HCYTA-60K). Standard curves were generated using a 5-parameter logistic regression using the xPONENT software provided with the MAGPIX instrument (Luminex).

1.2.10. LPS Stimulation

Day 14, adherent iMGLs were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml) or RPMI-1640 only (non-stimulated controls) for 4 hours at 37°C. Cells were then harvested using cell scrapers and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 300g. iMGL cell pellets were resuspended in 700μl of QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen) and stored at −80°C until use for subsequent RNA isolation outlined below (section 1.2.11).

1.2.11. RNA Isolation/Library Building

Total RNA was isolated from iMGL ± LPS stimulation using an mRNeasy kit (Qiagen). Quality and concentrations were measured using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Libraries were generated using the NEBnext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs). Briefly, following rRNA depletion, mRNA was fragmented for 7 minutes, converted to double-stranded cDNA, and adapter ligated. Fragments were then enriched by PCR amplification and purified. The size and quality of the library were verified using Qubit and Bioanalyzer. Libraries were multiplexed and sequenced on the NovaseqX platform (Novogene) to yield an average of 20 million 100 bp single end reads per sample.

1.2.12. iMGL bulk RNA-seq analysis

Quality control of raw reads was performed using FastQC retaining bases with quality scores of >20 and reads >70bp long. Reads were then aligned to the human genome (hg38) using splice-aware HISAT2 using annotations available from ENSEMBL (GRCh38.85) database. Quantification of read counts was performed using the GenomicRanges package in R and converted to transcripts per million (TPM) counts. Read counts were used to generate PCAs; then, all non-protein-coding genes were filtered out before differential gene expression analysis. Raw counts were used for testing of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using edgeR 50. Responses to LPS were modeled relative to unstimulated samples using negative binomial GLMs. DEGs were defined as having log2 FC +/− 1 and FDR <0.05. Functional enrichment of DEGs was performed using Metascape 51. Heatmaps of TPMs and bubble plots of enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms were generated using ggplot in R. A sPLSDA for non-stimulated and LPS-stimulated cells was conducted using the MixOmics 52 package with the normalized counts.

For the comparison of transcriptional profiles between iMGL, monocytes, and primary microglia, we leveraged our previously published bulk-RNAseq dataset on human UCB monocytes 53, as well as a human primary microglia data set by Galatro et al 54. After merging datasets, all genes were annotated using the ENSEMBL (GRCh38.85) database. Quantification of read counts, PCA generation, and differential gene expression analysis were performed as outlined above. Module scores were generated by repurposing the AddModuleScore() function found in Seurat3 toward bulk RNA-seq data processed with DESeq2 55. The 135 input genes used to generate Module Scores were selected from human microglia gene sets in the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) 56 and are listed and described in Supplemental table 1. The DEGs produced by the primary microglia vs monocyte and iMGL vs monocyte comparisons were modelled using a Venn diagram using VennDiagram in R. Functional enrichment of the genes identified as common in the Venn diagram was performed using Metascape 51. Heatmaps of TPMs and bubble plots of enrichment of GO terms were generated using ggplot in R. The association between log2 fold change and FDR was modelled using EnchancedVolcano in R to generate a volcano plot. Gene lists used to for bulk-RNAseq analysis are outlined in Supplemental Tables 13.

1.2.14. Statistical analysis

We conducted a normality assessment using the Shapiro-Wilk test (alpha=0.05) and identified/removed outliers through ROUT analysis (Q=0.1%). For two-group comparisons, if the dataset showed adherence to a normal distribution, group differences were assessed using an unpaired T-test with Welch’s correction. In cases where the data did not meet Gaussian assumptions, group comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney test. For comparisons of three independent variables (e.g. control vs POE HCV− vs POE HCV+) or four independent variables (e.g. UCBMC vs control vs POE HCV− vs POE HCV+), if the dataset showed adherence to a normal distribution, group differences were assessed using a One-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test for independent comparisons. In cases where the data did not meet Gaussian assumptions, group comparisons were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test with uncorrected Dunn’s test for independent comparisons. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism (GraphPad).

1.3. RESULTS

1.3.1. In utero fetal exposure to maternal opioid use and HCV infection lead to adverse maternal-fetal outcomes.

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) from newborns with and without prenatal opioid exposure (POE) was collected from full-term (>37 weeks’ gestation) pregnancies. Maternal demographics are summarized in Table 1. At enrollment, all participants in the POE group were screened for severity of opioid use disorder per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) criteria. All participants in the POE group reported a history of illicit use of one or more opioids (heroin, fentanyl, and/or non-prescribed oxycodone, hydrocodone, buprenorphine, and methadone products) (Figure 1A) and met the criteria for severe opioid use disorder, by meeting 4 or more DSM-V criteria at time of enrollment (Table 1). All participants received buprenorphine (a partial opioid agonist) throughout their pregnancies for management of opioid use disorder. Given the high prevalence of hepatitis C infection (HCV) with intravenous drug use, we stratified participants based on their HCV status, via self-reporting and confirmed by HCV IgG antibody detection at time of delivery (Table 1). Of the 12 participants positive for HCV IgG, 5 were also positive for viral load detected by RT-qPCR, indicating active HCV infection at time of delivery. Other maternal factors including parity, maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational age at delivery, race, and ethnicity were comparable between control, and POE ± HCV groups (Table 1).

Figure 1: History of maternal opioid use and newborn outcomes.

Figure 1:

(A) Pie chart depicting self-reported maternal opioid use at time of enrollment in the past 1 year. (B-D) Bar plots of (B) newborn birthweight (grams) and length (centimeters), (C) newborn length of stay in intensive care units (NICU/NACU), and (D) highest Finnegan score measured. (E) Stacked bar graph depicting the frequency of newborns receiving pharmacological treatment (morphine) for NOWS among POE HCV− and POE HCV+ groups. #=p<0.1, *=p<0.05, ***=p<0.001.

POE exerts acute and long-term adverse outcomes for newborns, including growth restriction, developmental delays, and the increased likelihood of chronic diseases in later life 57. Here, newborns with POE ± maternal HCV exposure were born smaller (Figure 1B) and more likely to require admission to intensive care units (NICU/NACU) for the management of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) (Figure 1C). The Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (FNAS) scoring is a commonly used clinical tool to guide pharmacological interventions in infants with NOWS 58, with scores above 8 considered pathological and requiring treatment 59. We report comparable Finnegan scores in newborns with POE regardless of maternal HCV status (Figure 1D). However, newborns with POE and maternal HCV exposure were significantly more likely to require treatment for severe NOWS symptoms compared to those with POE without maternal HCV exposure (Figure 1E). Overall, these clinical findings indicate that POE and maternal HCV infection are associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

1.3.2. UCB-derived microglia-like cells (iMGL) as a model of prenatal opioid exposure (POE).

Microglia originate from erythromyeloid progenitors (EMP) in the fetal yolk-sac and are brain-resident macrophages that play a key role in neurodevelopment by regulating synapse formation and supporting neuronal proliferation 60. Their early ontogeny during fetal development makes them exquisitely sensitive to changes in maternal health 61, 62. Fetal monocytes also originate from EMP’s in the fetal yolk-sac as well as liver 45. Given the shared EMP origin of microglia and fetal monocytes, we leveraged and optimized an established protocol to differentiate microglia-like cells from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells (iMGL) 43 to uncover how POE +/− HCV priming affects microglia development and sensitization. iMGL were harvested from culture, and then phenotype, morphology, function, and transcriptional profiles were assessed using flow cytometry, immunofluorescence imaging, immune mediator production, and bulk RNA-sequencing (Figure 2A).

Figure 2: UCB-derived microglia share similar profiles to human primary microglia.

Figure 2:

(A) Experimental design. (B) Confocal imaging (40x) of DAPI (blue) and IBA1 (red, left) or (20x) TMEM119 (red, right) stained iMGL. (C) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the comparison of non-stimulated iMGL, isolated monocytes, and primary microglia samples. (D) Bar plot of module scores generated from a list of 135 key microglia and immune function genes across UCB monocyte, iMGL, and human primary microglia bulk-RNAseq datasets. (E) Venn diagram representing the unique and shared DEGs of iMGL and primary microglia compared to UCBMC. (F) Bubble plot of Gene Ontology (GO) terms associated with select genes from the 1189 common DEGs between iMGL and primary microglia represented in the Venn diagram in Figure 2E. The size of the bubble denotes the number of genes mapping to each GO term, and the intensity of the color denotes the statistical strength of prediction. (G) Heat map depicting genes mapping to select GO terms in Figure 2E. (H) Volcano plot of DEGs in iMGL compared to primary microglia. #=p<0.1, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.

Successful derivation of iMGL was first confirmed by morphology and expression of canonical microglia markers IBA1 and TMEM119 by confocal microscopy (Figure 2B). iMGL morphology was reflective of the dynamic nature of primary microglia, including the appearance of long, branching processes (ramifications), rod/bipolar like projections, as well as small, dense, and circular “ameboid” structures (Figure 2B). Next, we assessed the transcriptomic profile of iMGL compared to publicly available human, UCB monocyte 53 and primary microglia 54 bulk-RNAseq datasets. Because no RNA sequencing datasets are available for healthy human fetal/newborn microglia, we selected a primary human microglia the dataset that had young healthy adults (~30-40 years old) without neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)) 54. Our principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the iMGL transcriptome was comparable to primary microglia and distinct from UCB monocytes (Figure 2C). Similarities in gene expression patterns between iMGL and primary microglia relative to UCB monocytes were further highlighted by elevated module scores of 135 genes important for microglia differentiation and function identified in the molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 56 (Figure 2D, Supplemental Table 1). Our analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEG) revealed 1189 DEGs shared between both iMGL and primary microglia relative to UCB monocytes (Figure 2E, Supplemental Table 1). DEGs that were upregulated by iMGL and primary microglia compared to UCB monocytes enriched to gene ontology terms (GO) important for synaptic signaling (TMEM37, APOE, MSR1), as well as the development of cell/neuron projections and axons (PARP1, TRIM32, LAMP2), and glial cell differentiation (NRROS, MYOF) (Figure 2FG, Supplemental Table 1).

Next, we identified genes that were differentially expressed between iMGL and primary microglia. Genes downregulated in iMGL relative to primary included those playing a role in brain resident microglia (SIGLEC8, SALL1, P2RY12, CX3CL1, HLA-DPA1), DNA repair mechanisms (PPP1R10, MDC1), cell proliferation (FLOT1) and inflammatory responses (GPSM3, HCG22) (Figure 2H, Supplemental Table 1). Genes upregulated in iMGL relative to primary microglia are involved in microglia function (STAC, SARPC, GPC4, CRABP2, CD109, and TIMP3) (Figure 2H, Supplemental Table 1). Finally, given that opioids interact with both opioid and toll like receptors on myeloid cells, we assessed the general expression of opioid receptors (OPRD1, OPRK1, OPRM1, OPRL1) and TLR4 (Supplemental Figure 1A). iMGL express OPRL1 and TLR4, although to less extent than observed by primary microglia (Supplemental Figure 1A). Overall, these findings support that iMGL provide a useful in vitro model of microglia development and express receptors that are targetable by opioids and bacterial endotoxins such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

1.3.3. Altered phenotype and morphology of iMGL with POE and maternal HCV infection

To evaluate the impact of POE ± maternal HCV infection on iMGL morphology, we processed iMGL confocal microscopy images using the ImageJ MicrogliaMorphology and R package 49. The extracted 27 morphology features were plotted to observe the overall differences between the groups. Comparison of extracted features from review of individual microglia per group showed lower iMGL “area”, “perimeter”, “mean radius”, and “average/maximum branch length” with POE and HCV infection (Figure 3A). Additional morphology features that describe area and territory span were also lower in the POE HCV+ group compared to controls (Supplemental Figure 1B), highlighting that microglia are smaller, more circular and dense with POE.

Figure 3: POE and maternal HCV alter iMGL structure and phenotype.

Figure 3:

(A-C) Bar graphs depicting (A) Select microglia morphology features from IBA1-stained cells imaged at 40X and processed using ImageJ macro MicrogliaMorphology and MicrogliaMorphologyR package 49, (B) Cluster frequency of ramified, bipolar/rod, and ameboid iMGL, and (C) MFI of myeloid/monocyte activation markers measured by full spectrum flow cytometry. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, ***=p<0.001, ****=p<0.0001

We next used dimensionality reduction and clustering analysis using MicrogliaMorphologyR 1.1 to identify correlations between principal components and features to characterize iMGL clusters. This analysis of the first ten principal components generated 3 distinct iMGL clusters (Supplemental Figure 1C). Cluster 1 microglia were named “Ramified” due to characteristics including larger size (area, foreground pixels, # of slab voxels, height of bounding rectangle) with features of extensive and complex branching patterns (number of end point voxels, quadruple points, branches, junction voxels, junctions, triple points) (Supplemental Figure 1D). Cluster 2 microglia were named “Bipolar/Rod” due to features of rod-like shape (radii from hull’s center of mass, branch length, span/hull ratio, and relative variation in radii from hull’s center of mass) (Supplemental Figure 1D). Finally, Cluster 3 microglia exhibited features of ameboid morphology, including overall smaller size and increased circularity and density. We next scaled average values for all morphology features among clusters and highlighted individual cells using the ColorByCluster function in MicrogliaMorphology (Supplemental Figure 1E). The frequency of iMGL that fall within cluster 3 was significantly increased with POE (Figure 3B).

Finally, iMGL phenotype was assessed by spectral flow cytometry. We used a panel including CD45 (a pan marker for immune cells), canonical microglia markers (CD11b, IBA1, CX3CR1, PU.1, PR2Y12, and TMEM119) as well as additional markers of differentiation and function (CD14, CD16, CD68, CD163, TREM2) (Supplemental Figure 2A). Previous studies have identified CD11b, P2RY12, and TMEM119 as key markers for identifying microglia in early embryonic and postnatal development 44. While CD11b can be expressed by both macrophages and microglia, P2RY12 and TMEM119 are largely microglia specific 44. Therefore, the iMGL population was defined as CD45+CD11b+P2RY12+TMEM119+ (Supplemental Figure 2A). We report a decrease in CD45+CD11b+ population as well as the differentiated P2RY12+TMEM119+ iMGL in both POE groups, that is more pronounced in the POE HCV− group (Supplemental Figure 2AB), in line with reports of P2RY12 and TMEM119 downregulation and impaired microglia differentiation in disease-associated and reactive states 63. Furthermore, a modest decrease in IBA1 expression in the POE HCV+ group was noted compared to control (Supplemental Figure 2B) while CX3CR1 expression remained consistent among iMGL groups (Supplemental Figure 2B). The expression of P2RY12, TMEM119, IBA1, and CX3CR1 was negligible in undifferentiated UCBMC (Supplemental Figure 2B). With the CD45+CD11b+P2RY12+TMEM119+ subset as the parent, iMGL, population, we compared median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of key markers with POE ± HCV (Figure 3C). Relative to controls, iMGL derived from the POE HCV− group had increased MFI of PU.1, HLA-DR, and IRF8, which are important regulators of microglia inflammatory responses 64 (Figure 3C). On the other hand, the MFI of CD16, TREM2, CD68, and CD40 was all lower in both POE groups compared to control (Figure 3C) and have been associated with attenuated neuroinflammatory responses and phagocytosis 65 as well as neurodevelopmental disorders 6668.

1.3.4. POE and maternal HCV infection dysregulate iMGL function

Given the altered expression of markers important for phagocytosis by iMGL in the POE groups, we assessed iMGL function by measuring the phagocytosis of pHrodo Red E. coli BioParticles. Our results indicate a significant decrease in iMGL phagocytic capacity with POE compared to controls, that is further exacerbated by maternal HCV infection (Figure 4A). Next, we measured spontaneous cytokine production by iMGLs by Luminex assay. Levels of inflammatory mediators IL-1β, IL-6, and IL8 were modestly elevated in the POE groups compared to controls, regardless of HCV status (Figure 4B). However, the higher concentration of IL-6 and IL-1β was less significant in the POE HCV+ group (Figure 4B). Overall, these findings suggest altered phagocytic capacity and inflammatory signaling pathways by iMGL with POE.

Figure 4. Impaired iMGL function with POE and maternal HCV.

Figure 4.

(A-B) Bar plots depicting A) iMGL phagocytosis determined by uptake of pHrodo E. coli (MFI) by flow cytometry, and B) Concentration of spontaneous cytokine production in iMGL culture supernatant by Luminex. # = p < 0.1, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01.

1.3.5. POE and maternal HCV alter the transcriptional profile of iMGL

To further uncover changes in iMGL function with POE ± maternal HCV, we treated iMGLs with and without LPS treatment for 4 hours. We chose LPS as it is a commonly used stimulus to study microglia function 6971 and acute microglia responses in vitro are detected 4 hours post LPS stimulation 69, 72. Furthermore, opioids have been reported to weakly activate TLR4 thereby inhibiting LPS-induced TLR activation 73, 74 and murine models of microglia immune training have shown that prenatal LPS treatment can sensitize microglia to subsequent insults postnatally 73, 74. Therefore, we used bulk-RNA-sequencing to assess the transcriptional profiles of LPS treated iMGLs to distinguish possible preconditioning effects of POE ± maternal HCV on iMGL function. First, differential gene expression (DEG) among groups, revealed the largest number of DEGs between HCV− and HCV+ samples with and without LPS treatment (Figure 5A, Supplemental Table 2). DEGs identified among non-stimulated POE ± maternal HCV groups enriched to gene ontology (GO) terms including LPS response (IL1B, IDO1, PTGS2), positive regulation of cytokine production (EGR1, EREG, PTGS2), and negative regulation of cell proliferation (PELI1, ADM) (Figure 5AC, Supplemental Table 2). However, DEGs enriched to GO terms important for viral responses (IRF1, CXCL9, IFITM3) among LPS stimulated POE ± maternal HCV groups (Figure 5AC, Supplemental Table 2).

Figure 5. Transcriptional profiles of iMGL at baseline and following LPS stimulation are altered by POE and maternal HCV.

Figure 5.

(A) Bar plot of number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) by group (control, POE HCV−, POE HCV+) and treatment [Non-stimulated (NS) or LPS stimulated (LPS)]. (B) Bubble plot of gene ontology (GO) terms associated with the select genes expressed by iMGL in the HCV+ group compared to HCV−, of non-stimulated (left) and following LPS stimulation (right). The size of the bubble denotes the number of genes mapping to each GO term, and the intensity of color denotes the statistical strength of prediction. (C) Heatmap of average gene expression from comparison of DEGs (control, POE HCV−, POE HCV+) and treatment (NS or LPS stimulated). (D) Three-way Venn diagram representing unique and shared DEGs among control, POE HCV−, and POE HCV+ groups with LPS stimulation. (E) Bubble plot of GO terms associated with select genes expressed by iMGL in control, POE HCV+, and shared between both control and POE HCV+ groups with LPS stimulation. (F) Heatmap of average gene expression supporting the GO terms selected in the bubble plot in panel E.

Next, we compared DEGs post-LPS stimulation based on POE exposure and maternal HCV status (Figure 5D, Supplemental Table 2). In the control group, upregulated DEGs enriched to GO terms related to neurodevelopment and function (NCAM1, KIF5C, GRIK2, GAD1, SEMA5A, ROBO1, and ITGA2), while downregulated genes mapped to functions important for the regulation of IL-6 production (IL16, NOD1, SPON2) (Figure 5EF, Supplemental Table 2). Upregulated DEGs also enriched to shared GO terms across control and HCV+ groups, including response to wounding (ERBB2, BCL2, EREG), innate immune response (C3, CASP4, CAMP), and cellular response to cytokines (FAS, ICAM1) (Figure 5EF, Supplemental Table 2). Upregulated DEGs shared between POE groups enriched to GO terms including myeloid cell differentiation (CSF3, LYN, MT1G) with LPS (Figure 5EF, Supplemental Table 2). In contrast, DEGs upregulated only in the HCV+ group in response to LPS uniquely mapped to GO terms associated with viral response (IRF1, TLR2, HIF1A), cell activation (CCR7, IL6, SERPINE2), learning or memory (RCAN1, SRC, FOSL1), and modulation of synaptic transmission (CAMK2A, EDN1, KMO) (Figure 5EF, Supplemental Table 2).

Finally, a sparse partial least squares differential analysis (sPLSDA) of the non-stimulated iMGL further highlights the impact of POE and maternal HCV status on the transcriptome of non-stimulated iMGL (Figure 6A). Notable genes that delineated the POE HCV− group were associated with various neurological pathologies and fetal development (HDX, MN1, HSF5, GAREM1) (Figure 6B, Supplemental Table 3), whereas genes that define the POE HCV+ group were involved in neuroinflammation and neuropathies (CCDC57, MTX1, PRR5, PPP2R5D, SSU72) (Figure 6B, Supplemental Table 3). The sPLSDA analysis of the LPS-stimulated iMGL (Figure 6C) showed increased expression of genes involved in cell proliferation/growth (TRIM23, MRPL13, ODC), signaling (ASB8, CSE1L), and metabolism (BSC1L, LIN54) in the control group (Figure 6D, Supplemental Table 3). Expression of CFAP298, a gene involved in neurogenesis, was increased in the POE HCV− group, whereas the expression of several other genes that play a role in regulating microglia activation and inflammatory responses (FSTL1, HDAC5, GMCL1), DNA repair mechanisms (ZNF689), and neurodevelopmental disorders (TARS2, B3GNT8) were higher in both POE HCV− and POE HCV+ groups relative to control (Figure 6D, Supplemental Table 3). However, expression of genes involved in cell migration/signaling (CHCHD4, PTK7, SLC13A5), and nervous system development (RNF165, TBX1) were significantly higher in the POE HCV+ group (Figure 6D, Supplemental Table 3). Overall, our analysis of iMGL transcriptional profiles suggests that POE and maternal HCV infection are associated with a heightened inflammatory iMGL state at baseline. These analyses were performed on total cell populations, therefore, the varied degrees of iMGL differentiation in the POE ± HCV groups are possible drivers of differences in gene expression and LPS responses among iMGL.

Figure 6. Transcriptional profile of NS and LPS-stimulated iMGL by POE and maternal HCV infection.

Figure 6.

(A) PCAs from the sPLSDA comparisons of the non-stimulated (NS) iMGL displayed in 1-2 (top) and 3-4 (bottom) space. (B) Heatmap of the average gene expression from selected genes from the sPLSDA of the NS iMGL. (C) PCA from the sPLSDA comparison of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated iMGL. (D) Heatmap of the TMP values of selected genes from the sPLSDA of LPS-stimulated iMGL.

1.4. DISCUSSION

In early pregnancy, yolk sac-derived fetal myeloid progenitors seed in the fetal brain and mature into microglia, critical regulators of neurodevelopment. As such, programming of microglia differentiation and function begins before birth and can be influenced by changes in the maternal environment. Rodent models of prenatal exposure to LPS have shown that maternal inflammation influences microglia development and function 27, 28, 75, 76. Similarly, previous studies have shown increased inflammation and immune activation in both maternal and neonatal circulation in rodent models of prenatal opioid exposure (POE) 77. This “priming” or “conditioning” prenatally can lead to immune tolerance (desensitization) or training (sensitization) of microglia and consequently altered responses to subsequent challenges postnatally 27, 28. However, few studies have addressed the mechanisms underlying altered microglia function and neurodevelopment in newborns with POE in humans. The few studies completed in rodent models of POE have demonstrated reduced microglia frequencies 78 and altered functional capacity including dampened surveillance properties including phagocytosis and sculpting of neuron circuits by opioid exposed microglia 20. Therefore, dysregulation of microglia development and function are a possible mechanism underlying adverse fetal outcomes and stunted neurodevelopment in newborns with POE. Consistent with prior studies highlighting adverse infant outcomes with maternal opioid use, our data show that POE is associated with smaller newborns who require long-term stays in intensive care units for management of NOWS 12. These findings underscore the need for additional models to better understand the mechanisms underlying adverse outcomes of newborns with POE.

Rodent models are not able to fully recapitulate the biology of human microglia 79. Therefore, patient-derived in vitro models of microglia function are warranted to recapitulate features of human neurodevelopment. Indeed, human microglia-like cells have been generated from human somatic cells and validated against primary cells 42, 43. Umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells share erythromyeloid progenitor origins with microglia 45, and therefore offer an accessible window towards early microglia development and priming. Here, we used a recently established model of patient-specific UCBMC-derived microglia-like cells (iMGL) 43 to recapitulate in vivo microglia development with maternal inflammation/immune activation. To support the use of iMGL as an in vitro surrogate to study microglia function, our data show that iMGL have distinct phenotypic and transcriptional profiles from monocyte precursors, are similar to that of other in vitro differentiated microglia-like cells 43, 80, 81, and share key transcriptional features with primary human microglia 54, 56.

In vivo, microglia morphology can provide insight into microglia function, as they protrude and retract their projections to survey and respond to environmental cues 82. We identified three clusters of iMGL based on their morphology designated as ramified, bipolar/rod, and ameboid. In vivo, ramified microglia are considered homeostatic, or surveillant, and are characterized by extensive branching with multiple primary and secondary processes 25. Microglia shift to unramified forms in response to inflammatory or damage signals in their environment, thought to increase motility to sites of inflammation where they phagocytose debris and release immune mediators to repair damage or resolve infection 25. We report an increased abundance of ameboid/unramified iMGL that have decreased phagocytic capacity and increased spontaneous cytokine production with POE and HCV compared to controls, suggesting that these microglia are primed towards an inflammatory phenotype but are functionally defective. Other in vitro models of iPSC-derived microglia have highlighted that ameboid microglia persist in cases of neuron/astrocyte death and remodeling 83, while others have identified ameboid microglia as under-differentiated or immature 22, 84. Our findings indicate a shift towards a more pro-inflammatory, and potentially damaging phenotype often associated with neurological deficits in primary microglia 60, 8587.

Given the increased ameboid morphology of iMGL with POE and HCV infection and the association of ameboid microglia with underdevelopment and potentially damaging neuroinflammation 25, we next assessed iMGL phenotype and function. Our flow cytometry analysis revealed a decrease in the abundance of “differentiated” P2RY12+TMEM119+ iMGL with POE and maternal HCV infection. Given the in vitro nature of this model, these findings suggest that POE may be interfering with iMGL development. However, downregulation of both P2RY12 and TMEM119 have been associated with damage associated microglia (DAM) phenotypes in vivo. This DAM phenotype has been further described by loss of TREM2 expression, a key sensor for damage and associated with neurodevelopmental defects 44, 88. Among differentiated iMGL (defined as CD45+CD11b+P2RY12+TMEM119+), we note significant shifts in the expression of key microglia reactivity and differentiation markers with POE ± maternal HCV. Notably, a downregulation of TMEM2, CD68, and CD40 which are all important for maintaining neuron development and mediating responses to inflammation or damage in the CNS 22, 65, 67, 89. Although iMGL from both POE groups secreted high levels of inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 at baseline, phagocytic capacity was decreased compared to controls. Impaired phagocytic capacity and therefore poor clearance of cellular debris lead to accumulation of toxic substances in the brain contributing to neurological impairment 9093. Furthermore, PU.1, HLA-DR, and IRF8 expression were all significantly higher in the POE HCV− group compared to controls, all of which have been associated with regulation of microglia development and maintenance 89, 94. Notably, PU.1 and IRF expression are important regulators of microgliogenesis, phagocytosis, and inflammatory responses 9597. However, elevated PU.1 and IRF8 expression can render microglia more resistant to cell death and become more hyperinflammatory, which can be detrimental to cells of the surrounding CNS 9698. Additionally, the elevated expression of antigen presentation protein, HLA-DR, by primary microglia has been associated with damage-associated pathologies 99, 100 and increased microglia reactivity 101. Overall, these findings suggest that POE primes iMGL precursors towards a reactive phenotype but are functionally impaired.

Normally, microglia are highly dynamic cells that survey the brain parenchyma for signs of damage, maintaining synaptic health, and responding to insults 102. Given the altered phenotype and function of iMGL with POE and maternal HCV infection, we further interrogated the transcriptional profiles of non-stimulated iMGL. Although fewer DEGs were noted among POE HCV− and HCV+ groups compared to controls, DEGs common to the POE groups mapped to pathways important for antimicrobial responses, cytokine production, and negative regulation of cell proliferation in non-stimulated iMGL. These results suggest that dynamic surveillance and homeostatic maintenance properties of microglia, are disrupted with POE. Our sPLSA analysis further indicates the expression of genes implicated in various neurological pathologies with POE in the absence of HCV. Aberrant expression of transcriptional regulators HDX and MN1 by human microglia has been linked to neurodegenerative diseases and poor synaptic plasticity 103 while upregulated HSF5 by neuronal cells in mice is associated with neural inflammation and impaired responses to acute stress, such as hypoxia/ischemia 104. iMGL exposed to POE and HCV infection exhibited the expression of many genes associated with neuro-developmental and -inflammatory conditions 105, 106. Notably, PRR5 and LGALS9B are upregulated in primary microglia in response to disease associated signals leading to increased phagocytosis and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines 107, 108. Our bulk-RNAseq analysis of non-stimulated iMGL indicate that support that POE induces a reactive phenotype that is further exacerbated by maternal HCV infection.

Finally, recent studies on primary murine microglia cells co-cultured with endogenous opioid peptide, enkephalin, have shown that opioids weakly activate TLR4 and significantly inhibit LPS-induced TLR4 activation 73, 74. Our data suggest that POE and HCV are conditioning microglia precursors prenatally thereby impacting responses to subsequent challenges. In response to a secondary challenge, LPS, iMGL from the control group generated the largest transcriptional responses with DEG that mapped to multiple pathways important for healthy brain development, nervous system function, and inflammatory responses. Acute responses to LPS are critical for immune surveillance mechanisms and neuroprotective functions of microglia 71, 109. In contrast, iMGL from the POE HCV+ group lack signatures associated with brain development and inflammatory responses. Previous studies in rodents have shown that sustained LPS stimulation results in a microglial refractory period resulting in synaptic and cognitive impairment 70, 110, 111. Given that iMGL were derived from UCBMC chronically exposed to opioids and/or maternal HCV induced inflammation throughout gestation and that opioids have been shown to interfere with LPS-induced TLR4 activation 73, 74, our findings suggest that POE preconditions microglia to be desensitized to challenges by tissue damage or inflammation. This immune tolerant iMGL phenotype with POE and maternal HCV is further supported by heightened inflammation at baseline (increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines) but impaired functional responses (decreased phagocytic capacity and LPS responses) compared to control. Impaired microglia responses to stimulation can, in turn, impede remodeling of the surrounding CNS leading to compromised neurodevelopment 112.

1.5. CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our study highlights the value of using a patient-specific model of UCB-derived microglia-like cells to interrogate the impact of maternal inflammation, such as POE and maternal HCV infection, on microglia development. This model could be used to interrogate mechanisms underlying altered neurodevelopmental outcomes with various maternal environmental exposures. We posit that POE primes early microglia precursors in utero towards an inflammatory state that impairs microglia development. Impaired microglia development is reflected by morphology (minimal ramifications, circularity, density) and the lower abundance of induced microglia-like cells in the POE groups. Furthermore, POE and HCV conditioning of iMGL are shown by elevated expression of markers important for microgliogenesis and inflammatory responses (PU.1, HLA-DR, IRF8) and higher production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8). However, iMGL in both POE groups showed poor phagocytic ability, decreased expression of key markers of microglia function (TREM2, CD68, CD40, CD16) and decreased activation in response to LPS, suggesting immune-tolerant (desensitized) iMGL. These findings are further driven by maternal HCV status, supporting the need for early HCV interventions in pregnancy.

1.6. LIMITATIONS

While this model leveraging patient-specific iMGL provides an accessible window towards fetal neurodevelopment, some limitations exist. We were able to show that iMGL share a similar phenotype and transcriptional profile to primary microglia. However, this model is limited by its inability to fully recapitulate the microenvironment of the CNS. Indeed, recent studies have used neuron-microglia co-cultures to help bridge this gap 113115, however, further studies are needed to implement these co-culture models in the context of POE and fetal neurodevelopment. Furthermore, our study is limited by relatively lower cell counts compared to studies performed using cell lines. A limitation of our transcriptional profiling analysis by bulk-RNAseq is the inability to analyze our data on a single cell resolution. Future studies should implement single-cellRNA seq methods to better define differences in iMGL differentiation between groups. Finally, studies in the field of substance use disorders are challenged by the prevalence of polysubstance abuse, making the delineation of the impact of opioids difficult. While we were unable to quantify the level of opioid exposure to the fetus, we attempted to mitigate these variances by only including pregnant women diagnosed with severe opioid use disorder per DSM-V criteria and were stabilized on opioid replacement therapy (buprenorphine products). Future studies should be refined by using additional methods to quantify POE, including newborn urine/meconium testing and HPLC methods to detect the presence of opioid subtypes in the offspring.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figure 1

Supplemental Figure 1:

(A) Bar plots depicting the transcripts per million (TPM) of opioid and toll-like receptor genes across UCB monocyte, iMGL, and human primary microglia bulk-RNAseq datasets. (B) Bar graphs depicting additional microglia morphology features from IBA1-stained cells imaged at 40X and processed using ImageJ macro MicrogliaMorphology and MicrogliaMorphologyR package 49. (C) Principal components analysis (*abs(R)>0.55; p<0.05) of iMGL clustered into three classes using k-means clustering. (D) Heatmap of cluster-specific measures on average; the measures were scaled across clusters. (E) Representative image of iMGL from each group highlighted to reflect cluster identification (blue = ameboid, red = ramified, yellow = biploar/rod. Any white structures showing in the image are either background or microglia structures cutoff in the image and not included in analysis. *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001, ****=p<0.0001.

Supplemental Figure 2

Supplemental Figure 2

(A) Gating strategy used for UCBMC and iMGL phenotyping including representative gating from control (top), POE HCV− (middle), and POE HCV+ (bottom) iMGL groups. Cell frequencies shown in red were calculated from the single cell population. (B) Bar graphs depicting percent expression of canonical microglia markers by UCBMC and iMGL by flow cytometry. #=p<0.1, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001, ****=p<0.0001.

Supplemental Table 3

Supplemental Table 3: Gene lists supporting the sPLSDA analysis from bulk-RNA-seq data by POE ± HCV and with and without LPS treatment in Figure 6.

Supplemental Table 2

Supplemental Table 2: Gene lists supporting the iMGL bulk-RNA-seq analysis by POE ± HCV and with and without LPS treatment in Figure 5.

Supplemental Table 1

Supplemental Table 1: Gene lists supporting the UCB monocyte vs primary microglia vs iMGL bulk-RNAseq comparisons in Figure 2.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to all participants in this study. We thank the Maternal Fetal Medicine Research Unit at the University of Kentucky for sample collection and members of the Messaoudi Laboratory for assistance with sample processing. We would also like to acknowledge that this research was supported by the Flow Cytometry and Immune Monitoring Shared Resource of the University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center (P30CA177558).

FUNDING

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health: 1R01DA059152-01 (IM), 7R01AI145910-05S1 (IM), TL1TR001997 (HT) and pilot funding from the University of Kentucky, including the Clinical and Translational Science Substance Use Disorder pilot grant 3210003238 (IM) and the Substance Use Priority Research Area (SUPRA) pilot grant supported by the Vice President for Research 1013177365 (HT). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the University of Kentucky.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Declarations of interest: none

DATA AVAILABILITY

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available on NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive: PRJNA970759 (UCB monocytes) 53, PRJNA1216256 (UCB-monocyte derived microglia-like cells), and PRJNA387182 (primary human microglia) 54.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mattson CL, Tanz LJ, Quinn K, Kariisa M, Patel P, Davis NL. Trends and Geographic Patterns in Drug and Synthetic Opioid Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(6):202–7. Epub 20210212. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7006a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS) Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services C; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hornburg KJ, Slosky LM, Cofer G, Cook J, Qi Y, Porkka F, Clark NB, Pires A, Petrella JR, White LE, Wetsel WC, Barak L, Caron MG, Johnson GA. Prenatal heroin exposure alters brain morphology and connectivity in adolescent mice. NMR Biomed. 2023;36(2):e4842. Epub 20221123. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patrick SW, Barfield WD, Poindexter BB, FETUS CO, NEWBORN COSU, PREVENTION, Cummings J, Hand I, Adams-Chapman I, Aucott SW, Puopolo KM, Goldsmith JP, Kaufman D, Martin C, Mowitz M, Gonzalez L, Camenga DR, Quigley J, Ryan SA, Walker-Harding L. Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;146(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-029074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malek A, Mattison DR. Drugs and medicines in pregnancy: the placental disposition of opioids. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12(5):797–803. doi: 10.2174/138920111795470859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jhaveri R, Swamy GK. Hepatitis C Virus in Pregnancy and Early Childhood: Current Understanding and Knowledge Deficits. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2014;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13–8. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boldeanu MV, Silosi I, Barbulescu AL, Sandu RE, Geormaneanu C, Padureanu V, Popescu-Driga MV, Poenariu IS, Silosi CA, Ungureanu AM, Dijmarescu AL, Boldeanu L. Host immune response in chronic hepatitis C infection: involvement of cytokines and inflammasomes. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020;61(1):33–43. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.1.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Margraf A, Perretti M. Immune Cell Plasticity in Inflammation: Insights into Description and Regulation of Immune Cell Phenotypes. Cells. 2022;11(11). Epub 20220602. doi: 10.3390/cells11111824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simmons SC, Grecco GG, Atwood BK, Nugent FS. Effects of prenatal opioid exposure on synaptic adaptations and behaviors across development. Neuropharmacology. 2023;222:109312. Epub 20221102. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Conradt E, Camerota M, Maylott S, Lester BM. Annual Research Review: Prenatal opioid exposure - a two-generation approach to conceptualizing neurodevelopmental outcomes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023. Epub 20230207. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee JJ, Saraiya N, Kuzniewicz MW. Prenatal Opioid Exposure and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2023;35(1):142–6. Epub 20221206. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Graeve R, Balalian AA, Richter M, Kielstein H, Fink A, Martins SS, Philbin MM, Factor-Litvak P. Infants’ prenatal exposure to opioids and the association with birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022;36(1):125–43. Epub 20211110. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kelty E, Terplan M, Orr C, Preen DB. Neonatal outcomes associated with in utero exposure to oxycodone, overall and by trimester of exposure: A retrospective cohort study: Running heading: Oxycodone in pregnancy. J Pain. 2022. Epub 20221121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vasan V, Kitase Y, Newville JC, Robinson S, Gerner G, Burton VJ, Jantzie LL. Neonatal opioid exposure: public health crisis and novel neuroinflammatory disease. Neural Regen Res. 2021;16(3):430–2. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.293136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Piske M, Homayra F, Min JE, Zhou H, Marchand C, Mead A, Ng J, Woolner M, Nosyk B. Opioid Use Disorder and Perinatal Outcomes. Pediatrics. 2021;148(4). Epub 20210903. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-050279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Conradt E, Flannery T, Aschner JL, Annett RD, Croen LA, Duarte CS, Friedman AM, Guille C, Hedderson MM, Hofheimer JA, Jones MR, Ladd-Acosta C, McGrath M, Moreland A, Neiderhiser JM, Nguyen RHN, Posner J, Ross JL, Savitz DA, Ondersma SJ, Lester BM. Prenatal Opioid Exposure: Neurodevelopmental Consequences and Future Research Priorities. Pediatrics. 2019;144(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Benninger KL, Richard C, Conroy S, Newton J, Taylor HG, Sayed A, Pietruszewski L, Nelin MA, Batterson N, Maitre NL. One-Year Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022;7(4):1019–32. Epub 20220627. doi: 10.1044/2022_PERSP-21-00270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yeoh SL, Eastwood J, Wright IM, Morton R, Melhuish E, Ward M, Oei JL. Cognitive and Motor Outcomes of Children With Prenatal Opioid Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197025. Epub 20190703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Larson JJ, Graham DL, Singer LT, Beckwith AM, Terplan M, Davis JM, Martinez J, Bada HS. Cognitive and Behavioral Impact on Children Exposed to Opioids During Pregnancy. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2). Epub 20190718. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Smith CJ, Lintz T, Clark MJ, Malacon KE, Abiad A, Constantino NJ, Kim VJ, Jo YC, Alonso-Caraballo Y, Bilbo SD, Chartoff EH. Prenatal opioid exposure inhibits microglial sculpting of the dopamine system selectively in adolescent male offspring. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(10):1755–63. Epub 20220714. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01376-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ginhoux F, Prinz M. Origin of microglia: current concepts and past controversies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(8):a020537. Epub 20150701. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hattori Y. The multifaceted roles of embryonic microglia in the developing brain. Front Cell Neurosci. 2023;17:988952. Epub 20230512. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.988952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mehl LC, Manjally AV, Bouadi O, Gibson EM, Tay TL. Microglia in brain development and regeneration. Development. 2022;149(8). Epub 20220503. doi: 10.1242/dev.200425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Casali BT, Reed-Geaghan EG. Microglial Function and Regulation during Development, Homeostasis and Alzheimer’s Disease. Cells. 2021;10(4). Epub 20210420. doi: 10.3390/cells10040957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vidal-Itriago A, Radford RAW, Aramideh JA, Maurel C, Scherer NM, Don EK, Lee A, Chung RS, Graeber MB, Morsch M. Microglia morphophysiological diversity and its implications for the CNS. Front Immunol. 2022;13:997786. Epub 20221019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.997786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lubrano C, Parisi F, Cetin I. Impact of Maternal Environment and Inflammation on Fetal Neurodevelopment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13(4). Epub 20240411. doi: 10.3390/antiox13040453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eklind S, Mallard C, Arvidsson P, Hagberg H. Lipopolysaccharide induces both a primary and a secondary phase of sensitization in the developing rat brain. Pediatr Res. 2005;58(1):112–6. Epub 20050505. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000163513.03619.8D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singh G, Segura BJ, Georgieff MK, Gisslen T. Fetal inflammation induces acute immune tolerance in the neonatal rat hippocampus. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):69. Epub 20210311. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02119-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu Y, Chen R, Zhi F, Sheng S, Khiati L, Yang Y, Peng Y, Xia Y. delta-opioid Receptor, Microglia and Neuroinflammation. Aging Dis. 2023;14(3):778–93. Epub 20230601. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.0912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mali AS, Novotny J. Opioid receptor activation suppresses the neuroinflammatory response by promoting microglial M2 polarization. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2022;121:103744. Epub 20220602. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2022.103744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lankhuijzen LM, Ridler T. Opioids, microglia, and temporal lobe epilepsy. Frontiers in Neurology. 2024;14. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1298489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Green JM, Sundman MH, Chou YH. Opioid-induced microglia reactivity modulates opioid reward, analgesia, and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;135:104544. Epub 20220125. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu L, Xu Y, Dai H, Tan S, Mao X, Chen Z. Dynorphin activation of kappa opioid receptor promotes microglial polarization toward M2 phenotype via TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:42. Epub 20200317. doi: 10.1186/s13578-020-00387-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schafer ST, Mansour AA, Schlachetzki JCM, Pena M, Ghassemzadeh S, Mitchell L, Mar A, Quang D, Stumpf S, Ortiz IS, Lana AJ, Baek C, Zaghal R, Glass CK, Nimmerjahn A, Gage FH. An in vivo neuroimmune organoid model to study human microglia phenotypes. Cell. 2023;186(10):2111–26.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mizee MR, Miedema SS, van der Poel M, Adelia, Schuurman KG, van Strien ME, Melief J, Smolders J, Hendrickx DA, Heutinck KM, Hamann J, Huitinga I. Isolation of primary microglia from the human post-mortem brain: effects of ante- and post-mortem variables. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017;5(1):16. Epub 20170217. doi: 10.1186/s40478-017-0418-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Garcia-Mesa Y, Jay TR, Checkley MA, Luttge B, Dobrowolski C, Valadkhan S, Landreth GE, Karn J, Alvarez-Carbonell D. Immortalization of primary microglia: a new platform to study HIV regulation in the central nervous system. J Neurovirol. 2017;23(1):47–66. Epub 20161121. doi: 10.1007/s13365-016-0499-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lian H, Roy E, Zheng H. Protocol for Primary Microglial Culture Preparation. Bio Protoc. 2016;6(21). doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lanfer J, Kaindl J, Krumm L, Gonzalez Acera M, Neurath M, Regensburger M, Krach F, Winner B. Efficient and Easy Conversion of Human iPSCs into Functional Induced Microglia-like Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9). Epub 20220420. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cartier N, Lewis CA, Zhang R, Rossi FM. The role of microglia in human disease: therapeutic tool or target? Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(3):363–80. Epub 20140809. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1330-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schepanski S, Ngoumou GB, Buss C, Seifert G. Assessing in-vitro models for microglial development and fetal programming: a critical review. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1538920. Epub 20250129. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1538920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sheridan SD, Horng JE, Perlis RH. Patient-Derived In Vitro Models of Microglial Function and Synaptic Engulfment in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;92(6):470–9. Epub 20220119. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sellgren CM, Sheridan SD, Gracias J, Xuan D, Fu T, Perlis RH. Patient-specific models of microglia-mediated engulfment of synapses and neural progenitors. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22(2):170–7. Epub 20161213. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sheridan SD, Thanos JM, De Guzman RM, McCrea LT, Horng JE, Fu T, Sellgren CM, Perlis RH, Edlow AG. Umbilical cord blood-derived microglia-like cells to model COVID-19 exposure. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):179. Epub 20210319. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01287-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Paolicelli RC, Sierra A, Stevens B, Tremblay ME, Aguzzi A, Ajami B, Amit I, Audinat E, Bechmann I, Bennett M, Bennett F, Bessis A, Biber K, Bilbo S, Blurton-Jones M, Boddeke E, Brites D, Brone B, Brown GC, Butovsky O, Carson MJ, Castellano B, Colonna M, Cowley SA, Cunningham C, Davalos D, De Jager PL, de Strooper B, Denes A, Eggen BJL, Eyo U, Galea E, Garel S, Ginhoux F, Glass CK, Gokce O, Gomez-Nicola D, Gonzalez B, Gordon S, Graeber MB, Greenhalgh AD, Gressens P, Greter M, Gutmann DH, Haass C, Heneka MT, Heppner FL, Hong S, Hume DA, Jung S, Kettenmann H, Kipnis J, Koyama R, Lemke G, Lynch M, Majewska A, Malcangio M, Malm T, Mancuso R, Masuda T, Matteoli M, McColl BW, Miron VE, Molofsky AV, Monje M, Mracsko E, Nadjar A, Neher JJ, Neniskyte U, Neumann H, Noda M, Peng B, Peri F, Perry VH, Popovich PG, Pridans C, Priller J, Prinz M, Ragozzino D, Ransohoff RM, Salter MW, Schaefer A, Schafer DP, Schwartz M, Simons M, Smith CJ, Streit WJ, Tay TL, Tsai LH, Verkhratsky A, von Bernhardi R, Wake H, Wittamer V, Wolf SA, Wu LJ, Wyss-Coray T. Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads. Neuron. 2022;110(21):3458–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sommer A, Gomez Perdiguero E. Extraembryonic hematopoietic lineages-to macrophages and beyond. Exp Hematol. 2024;136:104285. Epub 20240723. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2024.104285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Korzhevskii DE, Kirik OV. Brain Microglia and Microglial Markers. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2016;46(3):284–90. doi: 10.1007/s11055-016-0231-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Böttcher C, Schlickeiser S, Sneeboer MAM, Kunkel D, Knop A, Paza E, Fidzinski P, Kraus L, Snijders GJL, Kahn RS, Schulz AR, Mei HE, Hol EM, Siegmund B, Glauben R, Spruth EJ, De Witte LD, Priller J. Human microglia regional heterogeneity and phenotypes determined by multiplexed single-cell mass cytometry. Nature Neuroscience. 2019;22(1):78–90. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0290-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Monaco G, Chen H, Poidinger M, Chen J, de Magalhaes JP, Larbi A. flowAI: automatic and interactive anomaly discerning tools for flow cytometry data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(16):2473–80. Epub 20160410. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim J, Pavlidis P, Ciernia AV. Development of a High-Throughput Pipeline to Characterize Microglia Morphological States at a Single-Cell Resolution. eNeuro. 2024;11(7). Epub 20240730. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0014-24.2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40. Epub 2009/11/17. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, Benner C, Chanda SK. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Le Cao KA. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(11):e1005752. Epub 20171103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Doratt BM, Sureshchandra S, True H, Rincon M, Marshall NE, Messaoudi I. Mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 in unvaccinated pregnant mothers impairs neonatal immune responses. JCI Insight. 2023;8(19). Epub 20230912. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.172658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Galatro TF, Holtman IR, Lerario AM, Vainchtein ID, Brouwer N, Sola PR, Veras MM, Pereira TF, Leite REP, Moller T, Wes PD, Sogayar MC, Laman JD, den Dunnen W, Pasqualucci CA, Oba-Shinjo SM, Boddeke E, Marie SKN, Eggen BJL. Transcriptomic analysis of purified human cortical microglia reveals age-associated changes. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(8):1162–71. Epub 20170703. doi: 10.1038/nn.4597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Decoene I, Herpelinck T, Geris L, Luyten FP, Papantoniou I. Engineering bone-forming callus organoid implants in a xenogeneic-free differentiation medium. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering. 2022;4. doi: 10.3389/fceng.2022.892190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(12):1739–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mattison DR. Environmental exposures and development. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22(2):208–18. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833779bf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Finnegan LP, Connaughton JF Jr., Kron RE, Emich JP. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: assessment and management. Addict Dis. 1975;2(1-2):141–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jansson LM, Velez M, Harrow C. The opioid-exposed newborn: assessment and pharmacologic management. J Opioid Manag. 2009;5(1):47–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cowan M, Petri WA Jr. Microglia: Immune Regulators of Neurodevelopment. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2576. Epub 20181107. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Edlow AG, Glass RM, Smith CJ, Tran PK, James K, Bilbo S. Placental Macrophages: A Window Into Fetal Microglial Function in Maternal Obesity. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2019;77:60–8. Epub 20181120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hoeffel G, Ginhoux F. Ontogeny of Tissue-Resident Macrophages. Front Immunol. 2015;6:486. Epub 20150922. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Honarpisheh P, Lee J, Banerjee A, Blasco-Conesa MP, Honarpisheh P, d’Aigle J, Mamun AA, Ritzel RM, Chauhan A, Ganesh BP, McCullough LD. Potential caveats of putative microglia-specific markers for assessment of age-related cerebrovascular neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):366. Epub 20201201. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-02019-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pimenova AA, Herbinet M, Gupta I, Machlovi S, Marcora E, Goate AM. Protective low expression of PU.1 reduces microglial inflammatory and phagocytic response. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2020;16(S2). doi: 10.1002/alz.041201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ponomarev ED, Shriver LP, Dittel BN. CD40 expression by microglial cells is required for their completion of a two-step activation process during central nervous system autoimmune inflammation. J Immunol. 2006;176(3):1402–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lukens JR, Eyo UB. Microglia and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2022;45:425–45. Epub 20220418. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-110920-023056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tagliatti E, Desiato G, Mancinelli S, Bizzotto M, Gagliani MC, Faggiani E, Hernandez-Soto R, Cugurra A, Poliseno P, Miotto M, Arguello RJ, Filipello F, Cortese K, Morini R, Lodato S, Matteoli M. Trem2 expression in microglia is required to maintain normal neuronal bioenergetics during development. Immunity. 2024;57(1):86–105 e9. Epub 20231229. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen K, Li F, Zhang S, Chen Y, Ikezu TC, Li Z, Martens YA, Qiao W, Meneses A, Zhu Y, Xhafkollari G, Bu G, Zhao N. Enhancing TREM2 expression activates microglia and modestly mitigates tau pathology and neurodegeneration. J Neuroinflammation. 2025;22(1):93. Epub 20250323. doi: 10.1186/s12974-025-03420-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Qin H, Wilson CA, Lee SJ, Zhao X, Benveniste EN. LPS induces CD40 gene expression through the activation of NF-kappaB and STAT-1alpha in macrophages and microglia. Blood. 2005;106(9):3114–22. Epub 20050714. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jung H, Lee D, You H, Lee M, Kim H, Cheong E, Um JW. LPS induces microglial activation and GABAergic synaptic deficits in the hippocampus accompanied by prolonged cognitive impairment. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6547. Epub 20230421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32798-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ye X, Zhu M, Che X, Wang H, Liang XJ, Wu C, Xue X, Yang J. Lipopolysaccharide induces neuroinflammation in microglia by activating the MTOR pathway and downregulating Vps34 to inhibit autophagosome formation. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):18. Epub 20200111. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1644-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sabogal-Guaqueta AM, Marmolejo-Garza A, Trombetta-Lima M, Oun A, Hunneman J, Chen T, Koistinaho J, Lehtonen S, Kortholt A, Wolters JC, Bakker BM, Eggen BJL, Boddeke E, Dolga A. Species-specific metabolic reprogramming in human and mouse microglia during inflammatory pathway induction. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):6454. Epub 20231013. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42096-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gabr MM, Saeed I, Miles JA, Ross BP, Shaw PN, Hollmann MW, Parat MO. Interaction of Opioids with TLR4-Mechanisms and Ramifications. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(21). Epub 20211021. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lehnardt S, Lachance C, Patrizi S, Lefebvre S, Follett PL, Jensen FE, Rosenberg PA, Volpe JJ, Vartanian T. The toll-like receptor TLR4 is necessary for lipopolysaccharide-induced oligodendrocyte injury in the CNS. J Neurosci. 2002;22(7):2478–86. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02478.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fuma K, Iitani Y, Imai K, Ushida T, Tano S, Yoshida K, Yokoi A, Miki R, Kidokoro H, Sato Y, Hara Y, Ogi T, Nomaki K, Tsuda M, Komine O, Yamanaka K, Kajiyama H, Kotani T. Prenatal inflammation impairs early CD11c-positive microglia induction and delays myelination in neurodevelopmental disorders. Commun Biol. 2025;8(1):75. Epub 20250117. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07511-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lajqi T, Stojiljkovic M, Williams DL, Hudalla H, Bauer M, Witte OW, Wetzker R, Bauer R, Schmeer C. Memory-Like Responses of Brain Microglia Are Controlled by Developmental State and Pathogen Dose. Front Immunol. 2020;11:546415. Epub 20200925. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.546415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jantzie LL, Maxwell JR, Newville JC, Yellowhair TR, Kitase Y, Madurai N, Ramachandra S, Bakhireva LN, Northington FJ, Gerner G, Tekes A, Milio LA, Brigman JL, Robinson S, Allan A. Prenatal opioid exposure: The next neonatal neuroinflammatory disease. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020;84:45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Grecco GG, Huang JY, Munoz B, Doud EH, Hines CD, Gao Y, Rodriguez B, Mosley AL, Lu HC, Atwood BK. Sex-Dependent Synaptic Remodeling of the Somatosensory Cortex in Mice With Prenatal Methadone Exposure. Adv Drug Alcohol Res. 2022;2. Epub 20220425. doi: 10.3389/adar.2022.10400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Smith AM, Dragunow M. The human side of microglia. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37(3):125–35. Epub 20140102. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bohlen CJ, Bennett FC, Tucker AF, Collins HY, Mulinyawe SB, Barres BA. Diverse Requirements for Microglial Survival, Specification, and Function Revealed by Defined-Medium Cultures. Neuron. 2017;94(4):759–73 e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Abud EM, Ramirez RN, Martinez ES, Healy LM, Nguyen CHH, Newman SA, Yeromin AV, Scarfone VM, Marsh SE, Fimbres C, Caraway CA, Fote GM, Madany AM, Agrawal A, Kayed R, Gylys KH, Cahalan MD, Cummings BJ, Antel JP, Mortazavi A, Carson MJ, Poon WW, Blurton-Jones M. iPSC-Derived Human Microglia-like Cells to Study Neurological Diseases. Neuron. 2017;94(2):278–93.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science. 2005;308(5726):1314–8. Epub 20050414. doi: 10.1126/science.1110647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hedegaard A, Stodolak S, James WS, Cowley SA. Honing the Double-Edged Sword: Improving Human iPSC-Microglia Models. Front Immunol. 2020;11:614972. Epub 20201208. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.614972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cuadros MA, Navascues J. The origin and differentiation of microglial cells during development. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;56(2):173–89. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Eyo UB, Dailey ME. Microglia: key elements in neural development, plasticity, and pathology. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8(3):494–509. Epub 20130127. doi: 10.1007/s11481-013-9434-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Han VX, Patel S, Jones HF, Dale RC. Maternal immune activation and neuroinflammation in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(9):564–79. Epub 20210802. doi: 10.1038/s41582-021-00530-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mastenbroek LJM, Kooistra SM, Eggen BJL, Prins JR. The role of microglia in early neurodevelopment and the effects of maternal immune activation. Semin Immunopathol. 2024;46(1-2):1. Epub 20240711. doi: 10.1007/s00281-024-01017-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P, Giustetto M, Ferreira TA, Guiducci E, Dumas L, Ragozzino D, Gross CT. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science. 2011;333(6048):1456–8. Epub 20110721. doi: 10.1126/science.1202529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Matcovitch-Natan O, Winter DR, Giladi A, Vargas Aguilar S, Spinrad A, Sarrazin S, Ben-Yehuda H, David E, Zelada Gonzalez F, Perrin P, Keren-Shaul H, Gury M, Lara-Astaiso D, Thaiss CA, Cohen M, Bahar Halpern K, Baruch K, Deczkowska A, Lorenzo-Vivas E, Itzkovitz S, Elinav E, Sieweke MH, Schwartz M, Amit I. Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis. Science. 2016;353(6301):aad8670. Epub 20160623. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xu T, Liu C, Deng S, Gan L, Zhang Z, Yang GY, Tian H, Tang Y. The roles of microglia and astrocytes in myelin phagocytosis in the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023;43(3):325–40. Epub 20221102. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221137762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sen MK, Mahns DA, Coorssen JR, Shortland PJ. The roles of microglia and astrocytes in phagocytosis and myelination: Insights from the cuprizone model of multiple sclerosis. Glia. 2022;70(7):1215–50. Epub 20220202. doi: 10.1002/glia.24148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Santos EN, Fields RD. Regulation of myelination by microglia. Sci Adv. 2021;7(50):eabk1131. Epub 20211210. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Li W. Phagocyte dysfunction, tissue aging and degeneration. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(4):1005–12. Epub 20130604. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nayak D, Roth TL, McGavern DB. Microglia Development and Function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32(1):367–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Holtman IR, Skola D, Glass CK. Transcriptional control of microglia phenotypes in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(9):3220–9. Epub 20170731. doi: 10.1172/JCI90604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhou N, Liu K, Sun Y, Cao Y, Yang J. Transcriptional mechanism of IRF8 and PU.1 governs microglial activation in neurodegenerative condition. Protein Cell. 2019;10(2):87–103. Epub 20181127. doi: 10.1007/s13238-018-0599-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cakir B, Tanaka Y, Kiral FR, Xiang Y, Dagliyan O, Wang J, Lee M, Greaney AM, Yang WS, duBoulay C, Kural MH, Patterson B, Zhong M, Kim J, Bai Y, Min W, Niklason LE, Patra P, Park IH. Expression of the transcription factor PU.1 induces the generation of microglia-like cells in human cortical organoids. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):430. Epub 20220120. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28043-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pimenova AA, Herbinet M, Gupta I, Machlovi SI, Bowles KR, Marcora E, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s-associated PU.1 expression levels regulate microglial inflammatory response. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;148:105217. Epub 20201208. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Walker DG, Lue LF. Immune phenotypes of microglia in human neurodegenerative disease: challenges to detecting microglial polarization in human brains. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(1):56. Epub 20150819. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0139-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Gray E, Thomas TL, Betmouni S, Scolding N, Love S. Elevated activity and microglial expression of myeloperoxidase in demyelinated cerebral cortex in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2008;18(1):86–95. Epub 20071127. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00110.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Swanson MEV, Murray HC, Ryan B, Faull RLM, Dragunow M, Curtis MA. Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of myeloid cell marker expression in human cortex captures microglia heterogeneity with anatomical context. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11693. Epub 20200716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68086-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Colonna M, Butovsky O. Microglia Function in the Central Nervous System During Health and Neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35:441–68. Epub 20170209. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Brase L, Yu Y, McDade E, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer N, Harari O, Benitez BA. Comparative gene regulatory networks modulating APOE expression in microglia and astrocytes. medRxiv. 2024. Epub 20240422. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.19.24306098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yamanishi K, Doe N, Mukai K, Hashimoto T, Gamachi N, Hata M, Watanabe Y, Yamanishi C, Yagi H, Okamura H, Matsunaga H. Acute stress induces severe neural inflammation and overactivation of glucocorticoid signaling in interleukin-18-deficient mice. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):404. Epub 20220923. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02175-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mirzaa G, Foss K, Sudnawa K, Chung WK. PPP2R5D-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA)1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Arvanitaki ES, Goulielmaki E, Gkirtzimanaki K, Niotis G, Tsakani E, Nenedaki E, Rouska I, Kefalogianni M, Xydias D, Kalafatakis I, Psilodimitrakopoulos S, Karagogeos D, Schumacher B, Stratakis E, Garinis GA. Microglia-derived extracellular vesicles trigger age-related neurodegeneration upon DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(17):e2317402121. Epub 20240418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317402121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Deczkowska A, Keren-Shaul H, Weiner A, Colonna M, Schwartz M, Amit I. Disease-Associated Microglia: A Universal Immune Sensor of Neurodegeneration. Cell. 2018;173(5):1073–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Butovsky O, Weiner HL. Microglial signatures and their role in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(10):622–35. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0057-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kim J, Sullivan O, Lee K, Jao J, Tamayo J, Madany AM, Wong B, Ashwood P, Ciernia AV. Repeated LPS induces training and tolerance of microglial responses across brain regions. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21(1):233. Epub 20240920. doi: 10.1186/s12974-024-03198-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zong T, Li N, Han F, Liu J, Deng M, Li V, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Yu M. Microglial depletion rescues spatial memory impairment caused by LPS administration in adult mice. PeerJ. 2024;12:e18552. Epub 20241115. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ahmad S, Choe K, Badshah H, Ahmad R, Ali W, Rehman IU, Park TJ, Park JS, Kim MO. Physcion Mitigates LPS-Induced Neuroinflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Memory Impairments via TLR-4/NF-small ka, CyrillicB Signaling in Adult Mice. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(9). Epub 20240911. doi: 10.3390/ph17091199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Qin J, Ma Z, Chen X, Shu S. Microglia activation in central nervous system disorders: A review of recent mechanistic investigations and development efforts. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1103416. Epub 20230307. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1103416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Roque PJ, Costa LG. Co-Culture of Neurons and Microglia. Curr Protoc Toxicol. 2017;74:11 24 1–11 24 17. Epub 20171108. doi: 10.1002/cptx.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Luchena C, Zuazo-Ibarra J, Valero J, Matute C, Alberdi E, Capetillo-Zarate E. A Neuron, Microglia, and Astrocyte Triple Co-culture Model to Study Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:844534. Epub 20220414. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.844534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Baxter PS, Dando O, Emelianova K, He X, McKay S, Hardingham GE, Qiu J. Microglial identity and inflammatory responses are controlled by the combined effects of neurons and astrocytes. Cell Rep. 2021;34(12):108882. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure 1

Supplemental Figure 1:

(A) Bar plots depicting the transcripts per million (TPM) of opioid and toll-like receptor genes across UCB monocyte, iMGL, and human primary microglia bulk-RNAseq datasets. (B) Bar graphs depicting additional microglia morphology features from IBA1-stained cells imaged at 40X and processed using ImageJ macro MicrogliaMorphology and MicrogliaMorphologyR package 49. (C) Principal components analysis (*abs(R)>0.55; p<0.05) of iMGL clustered into three classes using k-means clustering. (D) Heatmap of cluster-specific measures on average; the measures were scaled across clusters. (E) Representative image of iMGL from each group highlighted to reflect cluster identification (blue = ameboid, red = ramified, yellow = biploar/rod. Any white structures showing in the image are either background or microglia structures cutoff in the image and not included in analysis. *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001, ****=p<0.0001.

Supplemental Figure 2

Supplemental Figure 2

(A) Gating strategy used for UCBMC and iMGL phenotyping including representative gating from control (top), POE HCV− (middle), and POE HCV+ (bottom) iMGL groups. Cell frequencies shown in red were calculated from the single cell population. (B) Bar graphs depicting percent expression of canonical microglia markers by UCBMC and iMGL by flow cytometry. #=p<0.1, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001, ****=p<0.0001.

Supplemental Table 3

Supplemental Table 3: Gene lists supporting the sPLSDA analysis from bulk-RNA-seq data by POE ± HCV and with and without LPS treatment in Figure 6.

Supplemental Table 2

Supplemental Table 2: Gene lists supporting the iMGL bulk-RNA-seq analysis by POE ± HCV and with and without LPS treatment in Figure 5.

Supplemental Table 1

Supplemental Table 1: Gene lists supporting the UCB monocyte vs primary microglia vs iMGL bulk-RNAseq comparisons in Figure 2.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available on NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive: PRJNA970759 (UCB monocytes) 53, PRJNA1216256 (UCB-monocyte derived microglia-like cells), and PRJNA387182 (primary human microglia) 54.

RESOURCES