ABSTRACT
Chronic and non‐healing wounds are a global health issue with limited effective treatments. Wound care costs continue to rise, highlighting the need for new therapies. Medicinal plants, particularly African species, show promise for enhancing wound healing. This review analysed 93 studies and identified 37 relevant to wound healing, covering 39 plant species. Ten species were identified for their rich phytochemical content, specifically flavonoids, terpenoids, and alkaloids (plant‐derived compounds). These compounds act synergistically, enhancing the wound healing process at each stage. Flavonoids reduce inflammation and support tissue turnover, while terpenoids enhance collagen production and wound closure. Alkaloids offer antimicrobial benefits and support wound contraction. Notable plants include Ageratum conyzoides and Aspilia africana (Asteraceae family); promoting haemostasis by lowering plasma fibrinogen and enhancing platelet‐derived growth factors; Withania somnifera (Solanaceae); and Entada africana (Fabaceae), effectively regulating inflammation. In the proliferative phase, Ocimum gratissimum (Lamiaceae), Calendula officinalis (Asteraceae), and Centella asiatica (Apiaceae) although C. officinalis is native to Southern Europe, and C. asiatica an Asian‐native; they are widely used in African traditional medicine and included here for their relevance in African wound healing practices; Justicia flava (Acanthaceae), Alternanthera sessilis (Amaranthaceae), and Acalypha indica (Euphorbiaceae); play key roles in enhancing collagen production, angiogenesis, and re‐epithelialisation. This comprehensive analysis highlights the role of African medicinal plants in wound healing and their potential to improve wound care therapy.
Keywords: African medicinal plants, alkaloids, flavonoids terpenoids, wound healing
Abbreviations
- 2D
2 Dimensional
- 3D
3 Dimensional
- Afr
Afrikaans
- B
Bemba
- bFGF
Basic fibroblast growth factor
- COX
Cyclooxygenase
- DPPH
Diphenyl picrylhydrazyl
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- Eng
English
- ETA
Ethyl acetate
- EtOH
Ethanol
- GC/MS
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
- H
Hindi
- H2O
Water
- Ha
Hausa
- HaCaT
Keratinocytes
- I
Ibo
- IGF
Insulin‐like growth factor
- IL
Interleukin
- MAPK/NF‐κB
Mitogen‐activated protein kinase/nuclear factor‐κB pathway
- MeOH
Methanol
- MMPs
Matrix metalloproteinases
- MPO
Myeloperoxidase
- NaDES
Natural deep eutectic solvents
- NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- NO
Nitric oxide
- p38 MAPK
p38 Mitogen‐activated protein kinases
- PDGF
Platelet‐derived growth factor
- PT
Prothrombin time
- RAW 264.7
Macrophage cell model
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- S
Sesotho
- Sw
Swahili
- TGF
Transforming growth factor
- TIMPs
Tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases
- TNF‐α
Tumour necrosis factor‐alpha
- VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- Y
Yoruba
- Z
IsiZulu
Summary.
Wounds, both acute and chronic, pose significant global health challenges due to their impact on quality of life, high treatment costs, and limited effective therapies. This review discusses the role of African medicinal plants in wound healing, focusing on their phytochemical compositions and mechanisms of action.
Ninety‐three studies were reviewed; 37 were found relevant, covering 39 African plant species.
Ten African plant species, containing flavonoids, terpenoids, and alkaloids, contribute to haemostasis, reducing inflammation and accelerating tissue repair.
1. Introduction
Acute wounds are breaches in the epidermal and dermal layers, disrupting cutaneous integrity [1]. The healing process occurs through primary or secondary intention, which typically involves multiple phases: haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling [2]. Chronic wounds, characterised by slow and prolonged healing times, present a significant global health challenge, impacting millions of individuals worldwide [3]. Factors like age and comorbidities, such as chronic diseases, contribute to the exponential rise in chronic wounds [4]. Moreover, the absence of effective pro‐healing agents, including topical medications, further exacerbates the quality of life for individuals with chronic wounds [5].
The anticipated financial strain of wound treatment costs underscores the urgent need for novel topical healing bioactives. Ideally, these would be derived from natural sources like plants and would have a long‐standing and safe record of medicinal use across diverse cultures [6]. Natural compounds derived from plants offer potential advantages, including biological compatibility, fewer side effects, and a diverse array of chemical structures conducive to discovering novel therapeutic agents [7, 8]. However, plant harvesting poses challenges to ecosystems, risking overexploitation and species endangerment; hence, regulations to mitigate exploitation are necessary [9]. While traditional extraction methods such as maceration, percolation, and Soxhlet extraction methods use organic solvents, are laborious, and may result in impurities due to compound heterogeneity, innovative green chemistry methods may offer more sustainable alternatives [10].
Moreover, advanced analytical methods, including liquid chromatography‐high‐resolution mass spectrometry (LC‐HRMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), can improve metabolomic screening and analysis, thereby improving product purity [11, 12]. In contrast, synthetic drugs offer high purity, which ensures precise dosage and absorption compared to natural sources. However, although reproducible, they may lack certain active compounds found in natural resources, potentially impacting healing abilities and contributing to drug failures. Meanwhile, semi‐synthetic technology strikes a balance between natural and synthetic drugs by incorporating structural modifications of natural bioactives into synthetic drugs while mitigating ecological concerns [13].
African plants, thriving in diverse climates, contribute significantly to the continent's botanical diversity. Notably, Southern Africa exhibits several unique biodiversity hotspots, including the Cape Floristic Region in South Africa and the Eastern Afromontane region [14]. These regions boast a high concentration of endemic plant species, meaning they are exclusive to these areas and not found anywhere else in the world. Numerous African plant species are exclusive to particular regions, enriching the continent's biodiversity [15].
Southern Africa, particularly the arid regions, is known for its diverse array of succulent plants, such as aloes and euphorbias [16, 17]. These plants have adapted to survive in water‐scarce environments. Moreover, Africa has a rich history of using indigenous plants for medicinal purposes. Traditional healers often rely on a variety of plant species with therapeutic properties, contributing to the continent's distinctive ethnobotanical landscape.
Despite Africa's rich biodiversity, research on medicinal plants lags behind other regions. In 2020, Salmeron‐Manzano et al. conducted a global analysis of research trends on medicinal plants spanning from 1960 to 2019. The study revealed that over the period, no African country exceeded 2000 publications in total, while recording China: 19,846; USA: 7,339; and Brazil: 5993 publications in this field [18]. With over 40, 000 plant species, approximately 5000 of which have been used in traditional medicine for centuries [19], and over 80% of the African population relying on plant preparations for various ailments, further investigations into the pharmacological properties of African medicinal plants are warranted.
Phytochemical compounds found in plants, such as flavonoids, terpenoids, and alkaloids; exhibit potent bioactivities, including stimulating cell proliferation and differentiation; promoting collagen synthesis, and demonstrating antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti‐inflammatory activities crucial for wound healing [20]. These attributes highlight the potential of medicinal plants in traditional medicine and suggest their potential as sources for future therapeutic options.
In this context, we present a comprehensive review of studies discussing the role of African plants and phytochemicals in wound healing. Our literature search, covering publications between 1960 and 2024, has identified African plant species with wound healing properties, providing scientifically validated information for our review. We applied search databases including Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed. Search terms included ‘African plants with wound healing properties’; ‘Effect of African plants in wound healing’; ‘African medicine in wound healing’; ‘Effect or action of phytochemicals in wound healing’; and ‘Plants as an alternative medicine for wound healing’. This search resulted in 93 studies, with 37 found relevant to wound healing, covering 39 species, from which 10, namely, Ageratum conyzoides , Aspilia africana, Calendula officinalis (Asteraceae), and Centella asiatica (Apiaceae); although C. officinalis is native to Southern Europe, and C. asiatica an Asian‐native, they are widely used in African traditional medicine, and included here for their relevance in African wound healing practices. Other notable species include Entada africana (Fabaceae); Ocimum gratissimum (Lamiaceae); Withania somnifera (Solanaceae); Centella asiatica (Apiaceae); Justicia flava (Acanthaceae); Alternanthera sessilis (Amaranthaceae); and Acalypha indica (Euphorbiaceae). These species, illustrated in Figure 1a–j, were selected for their rich phytochemical profiles. Their contributions to wound healing are discussed in Sections 3.3, 3.5. Only scientifically validated information on African plants demonstrating wound healing activities was included in our review.
FIGURE 1.

(a–j): Examples of African medicinal plants in wound healing. Illustration of the top ten identified medicinal plant species with direct involvement in the wound healing process; active in wound healing as antioxidants, promoting haemostasis and anti‐inflammatory activity, increasing cell proliferation, and collagen formation. (a) Aspilia a fricana (Haemorrhage plant or Wild sunflower (Eng)) (b) Ageratum conyzoides (Billy‐goat weed (Eng) or Bokkruid (Afr)); (c) Withania somnifera (Winter Cherry (Eng), Ubuvimba (Z), Ashwagandha (H)); (d) Entada africana (African dream herb, African sea‐bean (Eng.), Reuseseeboontjie, Boonbobbejaantou (Afr), Inkwindi, Intindile, Umbhone (Z)); (e) Calendula officinalis (Pot marigold (Eng)); (f) Centella asiatica (Bolila‐balinku (S), Indian Pennywort (Eng), Icudwane (Z)); (g) Justicia flava (Yellow justicia (Eng.), Geelgarnaalbos (Afr.), Impela (Z)); (h) Alternant h era sessilis (Sessile joyweed (Eng)); (i) Acalypha indica (Indian nettle (Eng)); (j) Ocimum gratissimum (mbijazane (Z), Umnandi (Z), Wild Basil (Eng)). Abbreviations: Afr, Afrikaans; Eng, English; H, Hindi; S, Sesotho; and Z, IsiZulu.
2. Wound Pathophysiology and Treatment
In acute wounds, the slightest disruption of the skin triggers a response that facilitates the onset of the wound repair process. The response begins with the activation of the coagulation cascade, inducing the production of growth factors such as platelet‐derived growth factors (PDGF). PDGF recruits platelets to aggregate in the wounded area, achieving haemostasis [21]. Simultaneously, inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin‐1, 6 and 8 (IL‐1, IL‐6, and IL‐8), along with tumour necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), and growth factors like transforming growth factor‐α and ‐β (TGF‐α and TGF‐β), insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), are also mobilised to the injured site. Neutrophils and macrophages are recruited to facilitate healing, debridement and removal of bacteria by phagocytosis [22, 23, 24].
Growth factors are released to mediate the activation and migration of adjacent cells, including fibroblasts, epithelial cells, as well as endothelial cells. This promotes capillary regeneration, facilitating oxygen, and blood supply to the wound to accelerate healing [25, 26]. Furthermore, fibroblasts release collagen, forming compact strands of proteins in injured tissues that create a scaffold that holds the wound together, thereby enhancing tensile strength. Activated epithelial cells then migrate to re‐epithelialise the wound surface during the healing process, leading to the eventual remodelling and maturation of the wound [9, 27].
During maturation, collagen is rearranged, and differentiated fibroblasts (myofibroblasts) align along the wound edges to contract and reduce the wound size. This process decreases vascularity, thus forming a scar (remodelling and maturation) [28]. Under abnormal conditions, including chronic diseases, prolonged infection, age, and immunodeficiency; the proper execution of wound healing phases is disrupted. This disruption may result in prolonged inflammation, poor cell migration, and angiogenesis; tissue necrosis from bacterial infiltration, reduced tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) resulting in an accumulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), decreased extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion, and increased oxidative stress [29, 30, 31, 32].
Non‐healing wounds require specialised care and treatment to manage chronicity and promote healing. A broad range of wound‐care products, including dressings and ointments, are available. These include Pentoxifylline, Iloprost (prostacyclin), Nifedipine, Diltiazem, Doxycycline, Deferoxamine, Betneval (Betamethasone), Fucidin, Silverex, Activon, and L‐Mesitran [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44]. Despite their purported wound‐healing efficacy, limitations such as drug resistance, including microbial resistance, reduced drug efficacy, and drug–drug interactions, have been reported [45]. This necessitates the ongoing search for alternative therapeutic agents. The advantages and limitations of current drugs used for wound healing are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Current therapeutic products for chronic wounds and limitations.
| Drugs | Uses | Mode of action | Type of wounds | Limitations | references |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pentoxifylline | Reduces inflammation, prevents claudication, and improves blood flow | Promotes TIMP‐1 gene expression, reduces MMP‐1, and MMP‐3 production, TNF‐α activity | Venous leg ulcers | Allergies, may cause internal bleeding | [36, 37, 46] |
| Iloprost (prostacyclin) | Severe limb ischaemia, prevents gangrene | Increases blood flow, reduces TNF‐α activity | Leg ulcers | Causes internal bleeding | [33, 47] |
| Nifedipine | Calcium blockers are vasodilators, increases blood flow, modulates inflammation | Promotes nitric oxide (NO) production, angiogenesis, epithelialisation, TGF‐β production, and Collagenase production | Vasculitis ulcers | Gingival hyperplasia | [38, 39] |
| Diltiazem | Calcium blocker, dilates blood vessels to improve blood flow and regulates inflammation | Promotes nitric oxide (NO) production, angiogenesis, epithelialisation, TGF‐β production, and Collagenase production | Vasculitis ulcers | Gingival hyperplasia | [38, 39] |
| Doxycycline (DOX) | Antimicrobial agent, prevents oxidative stress | Decreases MMPs activity, ROS production, NO production | Chronic wounds | Allergies, microbial resistance | [44, 48] |
| Deferoxamine (DFO) | Promotes angiogenesis and has antioxidant properties | Reduces ROS production and attracts endothelial cells | Chronic wounds | Drug resistance | [44] |
| Betneval (Betamethasone) | Regulates inflammation, reduces redness, swelling, and itching | Inhibits protein synthesis, reduces leucocyte and fibroblast migration, and capillary permeability | Chronic wounds | Allergies, increase susceptibility to infections | [40] |
| Fucidin | Antibacterial agent for bacterial skin conditions | Prevents bacterial protein synthesis and turnover | Infected ulcers, traumatic, and surgical wounds | Allergies, microbial resistance | [41] |
| Silverex (Silver Sulfadiazine) | Antimicrobial prevention and treatment | Disrupts bacterial cell membranes, and inhibits DNA or RNA replication | 3rd degree burns, | Allergies, microbial resistance, epidermal necrolysis | [42, 49] |
| Activon | Antimicrobial, debridement, regulates inflammation and promotes healing | Autolytic debridement, stimulates angiogenesis, granulation, and epithelialisation | Chronic wounds, Ulcers | Allergies, exudate | [43] |
| L‐Mesitran | Antimicrobial, debridement | Autolytic debridement, stimulates granulation, neovascularisation, and re‐epithelialisation | Chronic, fungating wounds, pressure ulcers | Allergies, exudate | [35] |
Note: Current therapeutic products for chronic wounds and limitations. The therapeutic products shown include Pentoxifylline, Iloprost (prostacyclin), Nifedipine, Diltiazem, Doxycycline, Deferoxamine, Betneval (Betamethasone), Fucidin, Silverex, Activon, and L‐Mesitran. Their uses, mode of action, type of wound they are used in based on site or chronicity and limitations are mentioned here.
Abbreviations: MMPs, Matrix metalloproteinases; NO, Nitric oxide; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; TGF‐β, Transforming growth factor‐ beta; TIMP, Tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases; and TNF‐α, Tumour necrosis factor alpha.
3. The Role of African Medicinal Plants and Bioactives in Wound Healing
Africa boasts a highly diverse population of plants, used by over 80% of the population for treating various ailments [50, 51, 52]. The use of plants in traditional medicine has ancient roots, dating back to more than 5000 years B.C. Consequently, there is abundant indigenous knowledge regarding the use of these plants in wound healing. This rich tradition has drawn the attention of researchers, leading to efforts to isolate and characterise plant bioactive compounds and evaluate their role in wound healing [53]. Studies have identified specific African medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds that contribute to wound healing. For example, Kigelia africana has been reported to promote wound healing, enhance tissue granulation, and improve glutathione peroxidase activity; it exhibits potent antioxidant properties crucial for neutralising oxidative stress during the wound healing process [54, 55]. Similarly, Elaeis guineensis , known for its antibacterial effects, helps prevent microbial infection at the wound site [56].
Evidence shows that plants contain natural compounds such as phenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids, which are produced as secondary metabolites during photosynthesis. These compounds play vital roles in protecting plants against oxidative stress and microbial infection [57]. Due to the presence of these bioactive compounds, African plants have shown a spectrum of healing properties, including antioxidant, antibacterial, haemostatic, anti‐inflammatory, angiogenic, and proliferative effects. Such activities are crucial in enhancing wound healing [58, 59]. Additional studies illustrating the diverse roles of plants in wound healing are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Other African medicinal plants and their mechanisms in wound healing.
| Medicinal plants | Common name | Geographical distribution | Actions in wound healing | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malva parviflora | Cheese weed (Eng) | Northern Africa, Mediterranean and widespread as introduced species globally | Anti‐inflammatory activity via COX‐1 enzyme action, antimicrobial and analgesic properties, promotes wound healing | [60, 61] |
| Ficus asperifolia | Sandpaper tree, Guardian fig (Eng) | Sub‐Saharan Africa | Antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory activity, promotes epithelialisation and increases wound contraction | [62, 63] |
| Gossypium arboreum | Wild cotton (Eng), Kotini (X), Umgawuma (Z) | Sub‐Saharan Africa, China | Increase hydroxyproline content, increases wound contraction, possesses antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties | [64] |
| Bulbine natalensis | Ibhucu (Z), Rooiwortel (Afr) | South Africa, Mozambique, Malawi, Zimbabwe | Improve collagen production, promotes wound contraction, increases tensile strength, antioxidant activity | [65, 66] |
| Bulbine frutescens | Snake flower, Cat's tail (Eng) | South Africa | Antioxidant activity, promotes collagen production and increases tensile strength | [65, 66] |
| Parkia biglobosa | African locust bean tree (Eng) | Nigeria, West Africa | Antioxidant activity, promotes fibroblast proliferation | [67] |
| Bridelia ferruginea | Iralodan (Y), Oho (Ibo) | Nigeria, West Africa | Promotes cell proliferation, antioxidant activity | [67] |
| Achyranthes aspera L. | Chaff‐flower, Devil's horsewhip (Eng) | Ethiopia, Kenya | Promotes wound contraction, neovascularisation, promotes epithelialisation | [68, 69] |
| Albizia adianthifolia | Flat crown (Eng) | South Africa, West Africa | Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities | [70] |
| Cissus quadrangularis | Veld grape, Devil's backbone (Eng) | Africa, Asia | Anti‐inflammatory via COX‐1 and 2 inhibitions, increase wound healing rate | [71] |
| Boerhavia diffusa | Red spiderling, Punarnava hog weed (Eng) | Ghana, India | Promotes cell migration antioxidant activity | [72] |
| Aloe muth‐muth | — | Africa | Antioxidant activity, increases cell migration | [73] |
| Aloe vera | Aloe vera , Aloe barbadensis | Native to Arabian Peninsula, widely distributed in Africa, Europe, and elsewhere | Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory activity, promotes TGF‐β activation, wound contraction, collagen production and decrease scar tissue | [74, 75] |
| Hypoxis hemerocallidea | African potato (Eng), Inkomfe (Z), Ilabatheka (X) | South Africa | Anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities | [76] |
| Ximenia americana | Tallow wood, Yellow plum (Eng) | Native to tropical Africa, Australia, Asia, America | Increases fibroblast proliferation, increases collagen production, promotes angiogenesis | [77] |
| Terminalia sericea | Silver cluster leaf (Eng) | South Africa | Scavenging and antimicrobial activity anti‐erythmic activity | [78, 79, 80] |
| Terminalia avicennioides | Kpace, Kpayi, Baushe (Ha) | Western Africa | Promotes wound contraction, reduces wound healing time | [81] |
| Momordica balsamina | Balsam pear (Eng), Intshungwana yehlathi (Z) | South Africa | Promotes wound healing by reducing wound healing time | [82, 83] |
| Fagonia schweinfurthii | Desert fagonia (Eng) | Africa, India, Pakistan, Iran | Anti‐inflammatory activity, promotes wound healing | [84] |
| Alchornea cordifolia | Christmas bush (Eng), Bundzila (Z) | Africa | Antimicrobial, anti‐inflammatory activity, promotes wound contraction | [85] |
| Zanthoxylum chalybeum | Knob wood (Eng), Mjafari (Sw), Pupwe (B) | Africa | Antioxidant, antibacterial activity, reduces epithelialisation time, promotes wound closure | [86] |
| Warbugia ugandensis | African green heart (Eng) | Africa | Antioxidant, antibacterial activity, reduces epithelialisation time, promotes wound closure | [86] |
| Kigelia africana | Sausage tree (Eng) | Africa | Enhances tissue granulation and improve activity of glutathione peroxidase | [87] |
| Tagetes erecta | African marigold (Eng) | Mexico, Central and South America, Africa | Ulcer protective activity | [88] |
| Jatropha curcas Linn. | Poison nut, bubble bush (Eng), Purgeerboontjie (Afr) | Mexico, America, Africa | Stimulates wound contraction and increases tensile strength | [89] |
| Elaeis guineensis | African oil palm (Eng) | West Africa | Antibacterial activity, promotes tissue regeneration and wound closure | [90] |
| Tamarindus indica | Indian tamarind (Eng) | Africa | promote wound closure, reduces wound healing time | [91] |
| Blepharis maderaspatensis | Creeping Blepharis Surprise packet (Eng), Skietpitjie (Afr) | Africa, Arabia, Asia | Improves wound repair, collagen synthesis and maturation, wound contraction and epithelialisation | [92] |
| Azadirachta indica | Neem (Eng) | Africa, India | Increases neo‐vascularisation, antibacterial activity | [93] |
Note: Other African medicinal plants and their mechanisms in wound healing. Medicinal plants (Scientific and common names), geographical distribution and their action in wound healing are mentioned here.
Abbreviations: Afr, Afrikaans; B, Bemba; COX, Cyclooxygenase; Eng, English; Ha, Hausa; I, Ibo; Sw, Swahili; X, Xhosa; Y, Yoruba; and Z, IsiZulu.
3.1. African Plants as a Source of Antioxidants
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are secondary messengers playing pivotal roles in the first line of wound repair. They exhibit bacteriostatic properties and regulate inflammation and angiogenesis in the wound [94]. However, excessive ROS production at hypoxic wound sites can lead to oxidative stress, prolonged inflammation, and impaired angiogenesis and re‐epithelialisation [95]. Several studies have evaluated the antioxidant activities of various plants. For example, a study by Annan and Houghton et al. (2008) investigated the antioxidant properties of Ficus asperifolia and Gossypium arboreum extracts using 2,2′‐diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) test and hydrogen peroxide‐induced damage in fibroblasts. The DPPH test revealed antioxidant properties for both extracts at IC50 values of 237 and 35,7 μg/mL respectively, in comparison to L‐Ascorbic acid at 21,1 μg/mL. Furthermore, the extracts exhibited cytoprotective properties, with G. arboreum showing the highest activity (82% at 50 μg/mL) and F. asperifolia showing 58% activity [62].
In another study, ethanolic extracts of Parkia biglobosa and Bridelia ferruginea demonstrated antioxidant activities at concentrations ranging from 3,8–31 μg/mL, compared with ascorbic acid (7,3 μg/mL) [67]. Komakech et al. (2019) reported that A. africana (Figure 1a) is rich in alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenols, terpenoids, β‐caryophyllene, germacrene D, α‐pinene, carene, phytol, and linolenic acid‐phytochemicals that play a major role in antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties [96]. Plant‐based antioxidants exhibit promising potential in addressing ROS‐related challenges in wound healing. However, it is crucial to emphasise that additional research and rigorous clinical validation studies are imperative. These steps are necessary to unlock and maximise the benefits of plant‐based antioxidants, ensuring their effectiveness and safety in therapeutic interventions within the field of wound care.
3.2. African Plant Extracts as Antibacterial Agents
Wounds are highly susceptible to infections, especially when antibiotic‐resistant biofilms develop. These biofilms can lead to the overproduction of inflammatory cytokines, resulting in a prolonged inflammatory phase that hinders cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and re‐epithelialisation [97]. Grierson and Afolayan et al. (1999) investigated the antibacterial activities of acetone, methanol, and water extracts of Grewia occidentalis , Polystichum pungens, Cheilanthes viridis, and Malva parviflora against various Gram‐positive bacteria (e.g., Bacillus cereus , Bacillus subtilis , and Staphylococcus aureus ) and Gram‐negative bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Enterobacter cloacae, and Escherichia coli ) in vitro. Their findings demonstrated that acetone extracts of P. pungens were effective against five Gram‐positive bacteria, while other extracts showed no activity. Meanwhile, methanolic extracts of G. occidentalis , P. pungens and C. viridis exhibited growth inhibitory activities against both Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria at 5,0 mg/mL, except for P. pungens, which only inhibited E. coli at higher concentrations. Water extracts showed limited activity against bacterial species compared to those obtained with acetone and methanol. Among the water extracts, C. viridis demonstrated activity against Gram‐positive as well as two Gram‐negative species, E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa. P. pungens was active against four Gram‐negative bacteria and E. cloacae. In contrast, G. occidentalis showed activity against only two species: S. aureus and E. cloacae. None of the M. parviflora extracts showed activity against all tested bacteria [60].
In a study by Kruger et al. (2018), the antibacterial and wound healing properties of Terminalia sericea leaf extract and isolated terminoic acid were investigated in Wistar rats infected with S. aureus . The rats were treated 48 h after infection, with gentamicin as a positive control. Results showed that both the leaf extract and isolated compound reduced wound exudate production and erythema, demonstrating significant antimicrobial effects on S. aureus , surpassing gentamicin, and being slightly more effective than the untreated group [78].
In another study, a methanolic extract of Terminalia avicennioides inhibited the growth of various pathogenic microorganisms, including Streptococcus pyogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, S. aureus , B. subtilis , among others, at concentrations ranging from 78 to 0,4 mg/mL [81].
3.3. The Role of African Plant Extracts During Haemostasis
In a recent study by Ebrahimi et al. (2020), the haemostatic properties of several plants were reported from different families. They identified common bioactives in these plants, including tannins, iridoid glycosides, glycoconjugates, lignans, saponins, and phenolic compounds. These compounds contribute to haemostasis by stimulating coagulation through the activation of coagulation factor XII activity, increasing fibrinogen levels, inducing vascular or muscle constriction, and promoting platelet aggregation. For instance, A. conyzoides (Figure 1b) methanolic extracts, administered at doses of 250, 500 and 750 mg/kg to albino rats for 2 weeks, demonstrated a dose‐dependent decrease in bleeding time, prothrombin time (PT), clotting time, and increased plasma fibrinogen. Furthermore, A. conyzoides reversed the anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects of conventional drugs [98]. A. africana is reported to augment haemostasis by increasing platelet‐derived growth factor, white and red blood cell, and basic fibroblast growth factor production [96, 99].
3.4. African Plant Extracts and the Inflammatory Phase of Wound Healing
Acute inflammation involves a cascade of regulated reactions or pathways, initiated by pro‐inflammatory cytokines like TNF‐α, IL‐6 and IL‐1‐β among others. Cytokines are chemo‐attractants that stimulate angiogenesis during inflammation, signal and promote immune cell influx to the wound site to facilitate debridement and healing [100]. However, in chronic wounds, this signalling is dysregulated, overriding innate anti‐inflammatory responses due to an overpopulation of immune cells and chronic production of cytokines at the wound site, causing tissue necrosis, thereby hindering the progression of the healing process. Therefore, anti‐inflammatory agents are administered to regulate this signalling, but because of current drug limitations, the search for alternatives is necessary [101, 102]. TNF‐α plays a dual role, promoting inflammation and tissue repair in acute wounds but contributing to prolonged inflammation and tissue damage in chronic wounds when dysregulated [100, 101, 102]. Studies have indicated that W. somnifera (Figure 1c) extract possesses anti‐inflammatory properties through the inhibition of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase/nuclear factor‐κB (MAPK/NF‐κB) pathways. This leads to the downregulation of pro‐inflammatory cytokine expression and the promotion of anti‐inflammatory cytokine production in HaCaT keratinocytes [103]. The nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) pathway is known as the central regulator of inflammation, activated by TNF‐α, IL‐1‐β, and toll‐like receptor (TLR) signalling, to drive immune cell recruitment, pro‐inflammatory transcription, and tissue repair. Meanwhile, the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is activated by TNF‐α, IL‐1, stress, and pathogen invasion, facilitating inflammation, cytokine production, apoptosis, cell survival, and subsequent proliferation [104, 105].
Another study by Owona et al. (2013) demonstrated that fraction Ea5 from E. africana (Figure 1d) significantly reduced lipopolysaccharide‐induced nitric oxide (a pro‐inflammatory mediator) production by 89.06% at 100 μg/mL compared to a standard in the RAW 264.7 macrophage cell model. Ea5 further decreased TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1‐β, and p38 MAPK activities by 30% [106].
These findings collectively support the notion that these plant extracts hold promise in modulating the inflammatory phase of wound healing. The identified mechanisms of action, including the regulation of key pathways and cytokine expression, provide valuable insights into the potential therapeutic applications of W. somnifera and Ea5 fraction in promoting a balanced and controlled inflammatory response during the wound healing process.
3.5. African Plant Extracts in the Proliferative and Remodelling Phase
Several studies have documented the effects of plant extracts on the proliferative and remodelling phases of wound healing. For instance, Komakech et al. (2019) reported that A. africana promotes wound healing in Wistar rat excision wounds by improving the rate of re‐epithelialisation and promoting collagen deposition [96]. Moreover, a study by Arulprakash et al. (2012) showed that the topical application of A. conyzoides (Figure 1b) extract on a rat excision wound model (40 mg/kg) promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis. The extract improved the rate of epithelialisation, wound contraction, and showed an increase in tissue tensile strength by 40% [107]. In another study, topical applications of W. somnifera paste and gel increased wound contraction, promoted re‐epithelialisation, and increased tensile strength in Wistar Albino rat excision and incision wounds [108]. Notably, W. somnifera was deemed a protease inhibitor, modulating the expression of proteases implicated in the degradation of the ECM in chronic non‐healing wounds. This inhibition creates a balance in the expression of proteases and inhibitors, thereby promoting wound healing [109, 110].
Additionally, Baidoo et al. (2021) showed that topical application of E. africana cream extracts on Wistar rats promotes collagen production, re‐epithelialisation, good scar formation, and increased tensile strength [111]. Muley et al. (2009) demonstrated that C. officinalis (Figure 1e) promotes wound healing by increasing collagen, hydroxyproline, and hexosamine production, reducing acute phase proteins and tissue damage in thermally induced burns in a rat model (200 mg/kg) [112]. Agyare et al. (2016) demonstrated that topical application of C. asiatica (Figure 1f) at 0.2% and 0.4% concentrations promotes wound healing by increasing hydroxyproline, tensile strength, collagen production, and promoting re‐epithelialisation in a delayed‐wound type of guinea pigs. Similarly, the oral administration of J. flava (Figure 1g) and A. sessilis (Figure 1h) extracts reduced wound size and promoted angiogenesis, collagen formation, tensile strength, and re‐epithelialisation [113]. Zahidin et al. (2017) reported that the ethanolic extract of Acalypha indica (Figure 1i) promoted wound closure in Wistar rats (excision and incision wounds) and upregulated the expression of TNF‐α and TNF‐β, the key signals for wound repair [114].
Similarly, Ganeshkumar et al. (2012) showed that topical application of A. indica extract to rat excision wounds (40 mg/kg) promotes TNF‐α expression during the early stages of wound healing, increases cell proliferation, TGF‐β, and collagen type I and III production. This accelerated wound closure and increased tensile strength [115]. Essentially, during the proliferative and remodelling phases, TNF‐α promotes keratinocyte migration, fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, ECM production, and remodelling. On the other hand, TNF‐β (Lymphotoxin‐ α), a member of the TNF‐α family, is not well characterised in wound healing, but like TNF‐α, TNF‐β promotes cell proliferation and remodelling. TNF‐α supports tissue repair in acute wounds, but when excessive, in chronic wounds, it impairs fibroblast and keratinocyte function, increases ECM degradation, and delays remodelling [114, 115, 116, 117, 118]. Excessive levels of TNF‐α and TNF‐β in chronic wounds hinder the progression to the proliferative phase, impairing fibroblast and keratinocyte function, increasing ECM degradation, and delaying tissue remodelling [116, 117, 118]. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of plant extracts is critical to informing the decision‐making process regarding their application, depending on the stage of healing and the type of wound.
In another study, Orafidiya et al. (2003) demonstrated that O. gratissimum (Figure 1j) essential oil promotes cell proliferation and wound contraction in incisional and excisional wounds of adult albino rabbits [119]. Later, Ifedioramma et al. (2022) demonstrated that O. gratissimum crude extract enhances wound healing by increasing the rate of re‐epithelialisation, increasing wound contraction and tensile strength in rabbit excision wounds [120].
These collective findings highlight the multifaceted roles of plant extracts in promoting the crucial proliferative phase of wound healing, offering valuable insights for potential therapeutic applications in clinical settings. However, it is imperative that further research, including clinical trials, be conducted to validate and translate these promising outcomes into safe and effective wound healing interventions for human patients.
3.6. The Action of African Plant Bioactives in Wound Healing
Compounds such as flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, tannins, cannabinoids, germacrene D, α‐pinene, carene, phytol, and linolenic acid have been associated with wound healing due to their anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities. These properties are crucial for regulating the wound healing process [61, 96].
3.6.1. Flavonoids in Wound Healing
Flavonoids, phenolic compounds abundant in most plants, exhibit excellent anti‐inflammatory properties crucial for wound healing. This effect was substantiated in a study by Majtan et al. (2013), which examined the in vitro effects of flavonoids (Apigenin and kaempferol) isolated from fir honeydew honey on human keratinocytes (HaCaT) with TNF‐α dependent overexpression of metalloproteinase‐9 (MMP‐9) [121, 122]. MMP‐9 belongs to the gelatinase class of the MMP family. Under normal conditions, it degrades and removes excess old extracellular matrix (ECM) during inflammation, facilitating angiogenesis and cell migration during re‐epithelialisation. However, an uncontrolled increase in MMP‐9 production has been implicated in the progression of chronic wounds. This continuous ECM degradation reduces tensile strength, impairs cell migration and angiogenesis, and leads to persistent infiltration of wound sites with pro‐inflammatory cytokines, causing prolonged inflammation (a characteristic of non‐healing wounds).
The demonstrated anti‐inflammatory effects of flavonoids, as highlighted above, present a promising avenue for therapeutic interventions in wound care. By modulating MMP‐9 activity, flavonoids show potential in mitigating chronic inflammation, promoting a balanced ECM turnover, as shown in Figure 2, and ultimately fostering an environment conducive to effective wound healing. As research in this field advances, these findings pave the way for the development of targeted strategies utilising flavonoids to enhance the treatment of chronic wounds.
FIGURE 2.

Action of phytochemicals in wound healing. The illustration delineates mechanisms by which phytochemical compounds promote wound healing. Flavonoids reduce inflammation by preventing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inhibiting TNF‐α secretion, regulating the production of metalloprotease‐9 overexpression thereby preventing ECM degradation. Terpenoids reduce inflammation by inhibiting oedema caused by the formation of hypochlorous acid through myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity; this in turn prevents ECM degradation catalysed by MPO activity. Alkaloids have antimicrobial properties and promote cell proliferation. Antimicrobial, anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, and proliferative activities are critical for wound healing. Created in BioRender. BioRender.com/j95t339.
3.6.2. Terpenoids in Wound Healing
Terpenoids are naturally occurring plant compounds from the terpene family, exhibiting remarkable wound healing effects, as demonstrated in various research studies. For instance, Riella and colleagues (2012) isolated and investigated the wound healing effects of thymol, a monoterpene extracted from the essential oil of Lippia gracilis leaves, in rodents. Thymol displayed potent anti‐inflammatory activity by significantly reducing oedema caused by hyperaemia and inhibiting myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, as illustrated in Figure 2. MPO catalyses the production of hypochlorous acid, which is responsible for excessive degradation of ECM and contributes to tissue damage. Additionally, the use of collagen‐based thymol‐infused wound dressings promotes collagen production and arrangement in the wound area, thereby enhancing wound contraction and promoting wound closure [123, 124].
In essence, these findings not only highlight the specific benefits of thymol but also contribute to the broader understanding of terpenoids as a class of compounds with substantial therapeutic potential in the field of wound healing. As research in this area progresses, the insights gained from studies such as these pave the way for innovative wound care strategies, potentially harnessing the unique properties of terpenoids for improved clinical outcomes.
3.6.3. Alkaloids in Wound Healing
Alkaloids occur naturally and are produced by bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals. Over the years, alkaloids have been found to possess important pharmaceutical characteristics, serving various roles such as analgesics, anti‐malarial agents, anti‐neurodegenerative agents, and wound healing agents, among others [125]. In 2014, Fetse and colleagues demonstrated the antimicrobial and wound healing effects of alkaloid extracts from Alstonia boonei root bark. Using the well diffusion method to test extracts against various microorganisms such as P. aeruginosa , B. subtilis , S. aureus, and E. coli , the extracts demonstrated high antimicrobial potency. Conversely, wound healing effects were elucidated via testing on healthy Sprague‐Dawley rat excisions, and their findings showed significant wound healing properties by accelerating the rate of wound contraction, which also indicated a reduction in the period of re‐epithelialisation [126].
A year later, Gould and co‐workers (2015) demonstrated the wound healing effect of an alkaloid‐rich Senecio serratuloides plant extract in pig models. Upon extract administration and wound monitoring, a significant decrease in wound area was observed, suggesting that the extracts accelerated cell proliferation and promoted wound contraction significantly, with minimal liver toxicity reported [127].
To conclude, the cumulative outcomes of these studies reinforce the potential of alkaloids as promising agents in the field of wound healing. The confirmed antimicrobial effectiveness, combined with the demonstrated capacity to expedite wound contraction and reduce re‐epithelialisation periods, as Figure 2 illustrates, establishes alkaloids as noteworthy contenders for further investigation and possible integration into wound care strategies.
3.7. Preclinical and Clinical Wound Models and Challenges
Preclinical and clinical models play an important role in evaluating wound healing interventions, each offering unique insights at different stages of translational research. Preclinical models include in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo animal models [128]. In vitro assays employ scratch, Transwell/Invasion assays, spheroids, organoids and 3D skin equivalent models. The scratch assay models 2D cell migration but lacks tissue complexity. Transwell/invasion assays, on the other hand, evaluate directional migration or matrix invasion, providing quantifiable data but having limited physiological relevance [129]. Spheroids mimic 3D cell–cell interactions and gradients; they lack full tissue architecture [130]. Although organoids replicate organ‐like structures with multiple cell types, enhancing physiological relevance, they are complex and variable [131]. Meanwhile, 3D skin equivalents closely resemble human skin with layered structure, offering high translatability but are costly and technically demanding [132].
Ex vivo models, including human explants and organotypic cultures [133], provide physiologically relevant data while avoiding systemic variables like immunogenicity. However, they have a short culture span, with donor variability. In vivo animal models range from rodent excisional/incisional, burn and diabetic wounds to rabbit ischemic wounds, which heal primarily by wound contraction, to porcine full‐thickness models, closely mimicking human physiology [134, 135]. Together they enable evaluation of the complete wound healing cascade, including inflammation, angiogenesis, and matrix remodelling. Several African medicinal plants, such as Ageratum conyzoides , Aspilia africana and Terminalia sericea , have been tested in these models, particularly in rodent and porcine models, to assess their wound healing properties, demonstrating enhanced re‐epithelialisation, collagen production and antimicrobial effects [78, 96, 107].
Clinical models, on the other hand, are essential for assessing efficacy and safety in human subjects, using standard acute wounds or chronic wounds like diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers [136, 137]. Despite their systemic relevance, ethical constraints, interpatient variability, and comorbidities are limiting. Overall, while the complexity and translatability increase from scratch to 3D models, each has trade‐offs in cost, scalability, reproducibility, and physiological fidelity. Nevertheless, together, these models help bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical application.
4. Discussion and Future Remarks
Based on the reviewed literature, the extensive diversity and utilisation of medicinal plants in traditional African medicine have captured the attention of researchers. Existing findings indicate that plants contain phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, and terpenes, which play roles in various wound healing stages. In vitro and animal studies have demonstrated that plant extracts and their derivative formulations possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, haemostatic, anti‐inflammatory, proliferative, and angiogenic effects. These attributes enable plants to restore equilibrium in wounds with delayed healing times by regulating oxidative stress, promoting angiogenesis, cell proliferation, collagen formation, and wound contraction, ultimately reducing re‐epithelialisation time, promoting wound closure, and facilitating remodelling, summary is illustrated in Figure 3. These findings suggest that medicinal plants may provide a solution to existing drug limitations, being natural and demonstrating low toxicity and high efficacy. New, naturally based therapeutics have the potential to improve the quality of life for affected individuals as well as alleviate the economic burden.
FIGURE 3.

Medicinal plants and bioactives as prospective agents for wound healing therapy. The illustration summarises the process by which medicinal plant bioactives, obtained from (A): plant sampling, (B): extraction using solvents like methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), water (H2O), ethyl acetate (ETA), natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES). Crude extracts are profiled in (C): using analyses like gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography–high‐resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) to identify (D): compounds in extracts which are then screened in (E): current wound models (i) in vitro and (ii) animal models for (F): wound healing activities. Studies have shown that plants containing phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, alkaloids, and terpenoids possess antimicrobial, anti‐inflammatory, proliferative, and angiogenic effects. These attributes allow for the restoration of homeostasis in non‐healing wounds by regulating oxidative stress, promoting angiogenesis, cell proliferation, collagen formation, and wound contraction, reducing re‐epithelialisation time and promoting wound closure. Because current models fail to closely mimic human physiological processes, (G): advanced methods including (i)‐in silico, computational modelling, (ii)‐organoids/organotypic models, (iii)‐ex vivo and ultimately (iv)‐in vivo (human) are needed to improve plant screening for better relatability and application in (H): (i) drug design and (ii) topical wound therapies. This gives a promising insight into the potential of the use of medicinal plants and bioactives in the development of natural‐based wound therapies. Created in BioRender. BioRender.com/z23f517.
The challenge in these studies was poor metabolic profiling and screening models. Several plants that have shown wound healing activities are poorly characterised, leading to a lack of understanding of their mechanisms in wound healing. Current models include in vitro 2D monolayers and animal models, which pose challenges due to their relevance to human physiology. Although 2D models are easy to use and show preliminary potential at a low cost, they do not mimic the physiological environment and lack cell‐matrix interactions crucial for signal transduction in wound healing. On the other hand, the anatomy and physiology of animal wound and scar models differ significantly from those of humans, resulting in erroneous interpretations. Consequently, results obtained using these models may not directly translate to what occurs in human skin wounds, contributing to an inability to translate these animal‐based study findings to clinical use.
In the future, more work is needed to characterise plant metabolites and improve the relevance of medicinal effects of plant extracts and isolated compounds by selecting suitable models to ensure physiological relevance, reliability, and applicability of medicinal actions in humans. The use of more robust preclinical 3D models, such as spheroids, organoids, organotypic, and ex vivo human skin wound models that can mimic the wound physiological environment, could potentially generate reliable and translatable results.
5. Conclusion
Our comprehensive review has identified 10 plant species with tissue repair activity and unveiled their unique contributions to different phases of cutaneous wound healing. The diversity of African medicinal plants and their wound healing attributes has gained considerable attention recently; this will provide an opportunity for continued groundbreaking research to identify novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of wounds. Improving data on plant metabolomics and refining screening models will undoubtedly contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanistic role of plants in wound healing, ensuring that the results obtained are relevant to human skin healing.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the South African Medical Research Council (Wound Healing and Keloid Research Unit), and the National Research Foundation (SARChI Chair in Dermatology).
Molefe P. F., Ghasemishahrestani Z., Mbele M., et al., “African Medicinal Plants in Cutaneous Wound Repair: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Phytochemicals,” International Wound Journal 22, no. 8 (2025): e70742, 10.1111/iwj.70742.
Funding: This work was supported by the South African Medical Research Council (Wound Healing and Keloid Research Unit), and the National Research Foundation (SARChI Chair in Dermatology).
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
References
- 1. Rosińczuk J., Taradaj J., Dymarek R., and Sopel M., “Mechanoregulation of Wound Healing and Skin Homeostasis,” BioMed Research International 2016 (2016): 1–13, 10.1155/2016/3943481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Landén N. X., Li D., and Ståhle M., “Transition From Inflammation to Proliferation: A Critical Step During Wound Healing,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 73 (2016): 3861–3885, 10.1007/s00018-016-2268-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tyavambiza C., Dube P., Goboza M., Meyer S., Madiehe A. M., and Meyer M., “Wound Healing Activities and Potential of Selected African Medicinal Plants and Their Synthesized Biogenic Nanoparticles,” Plants 10 (2021): 2635, 10.3390/PLANTS10122635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pierpont Y. N., Dinh T. P., Salas R. E., et al., “Obesity and Surgical Wound Healing: A Current Review,” ISRN Obesity 2014 (2014): 1–13, 10.1155/2014/638936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Han G. and Ceilley R., “Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments,” Advances in Therapy 34 (2017): 599–610, 10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sen C. K., “Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates,” Advances in Wound Care 10 (2021): 281–292, 10.1089/WOUND.2021.0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Stratton C. F., Newman D. J., and Tan D. S., “Cheminformatic Comparison of Approved Drugs From Natural Product Versus Synthetic Origins,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 25 (2015): 4802–4807, 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kim B., “Traditional Medicine: A Holistic Approach to Health and Healing,” Alternative and Intergrative Medicine 12 (2023): 434, 10.37421/2327-5162.2023.12.434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chen D., Hao H., Fu X., and Han W., “Insight Into Reepithelialization: How do Mesenchymal Stem Cells Perform?,” Stem Cells International 2016 (2016): 6120173, 10.1155/2016/6120173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bitwell C., Indra S. S., Luke C., and Kakoma M. K., “A Review of Modern and Conventional Extraction Techniques and Their Applications for Extracting Phytochemicals From Plants,” Scientific African 19 (2023): e01585, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Atanasov A. G., Zotchev S. B., Dirsch V. M., et al., “Natural Products in Drug Discovery: Advances and Opportunities,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 20 (2021): 200–216, 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Popova M. and Bankova V., “Contemporary Methods for the Extraction and Isolation of Natural Products,” BMC Chemistry 17 (2023): 68, 10.1186/s13065-023-00960-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mathur S. and Hoskins C., “Drug Development: Lessons From Nature,” Biomedical Reports 6 (2017): 612–614, 10.3892/br.2017.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Küper W., Volume 91 “Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden,” (Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 2019). [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kier G., Kreft H., Lee T. M., et al., “A Global Assessment of Endemism and Species Richness Across Island and Mainland Regions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (2009): 9322–9327, 10.1073/pnas.0810306106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Holland P. G., “An Evolutionary Biogeography of the Genus Aloe,” Journal of Biogeography 5 (1978): 213, 10.2307/3038037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Van Wyk A. E. and Smith G. F., Guide to the Aloes of South Africa (Briza Publications, 2014). [Google Scholar]
- 18. Salmerón‐Manzano E., Garrido‐Cardenas J. A., Manzano‐Agugliaro F., et al., “Worldwide Research Trends on Medicinal Plants,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (2020): 3376, 10.3390/IJERPH17103376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Petrovska B. B., “Historical Review of Medicinal Plants' Usage,” Pharmacognosy Reviews 6 (2012): 1–5, 10.4103/0973-7847.95849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chingwaru C., Bagar T., Maroyi A., Kapewangolo P. T., and Chingwaru W., “Wound Healing Potential of Selected Southern African Medicinal Plants: A Review,” Journal of Herbal Medicine 17‐18 (2019): 100263, 10.1016/j.hermed.2019.100263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Eisinger F., Patzelt J., and Langer H. F., “The Platelet Response to Tissue Injury,” Frontiers in Medicine 5 (2018): 317, 10.3389/fmed.2018.00317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Makrantonaki E., Wlaschek M., and Scharffetter‐Kochanek K., “Pathogenesis of Wound Healing Disorders in the Elderly,” JDDG: Journal of the German Society of Dermatology 15 (2017): 255–275, 10.1111/ddg.13199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Krzyszczyk P., Schloss R., Palmer A., and Berthiaume F., “The Role of Macrophages in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing and Interventions to Promote Pro‐Wound Healing Phenotypes,” Frontiers in Physiology 9 (2018): 419, 10.3389/fphys.2018.00419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kovtun A., Messerer D. A. C., Scharffetter‐Kochanek K., Huber‐Lang M., and Ignatius A., “Neutrophils in Tissue Trauma of the Skin, Bone, and Lung: Two Sides of the Same Coin,” Journal of Immunology Research 2018 (2018): 1–12, 10.1155/2018/8173983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yamakawa S. and Hayashida K., “Advances in Surgical Applications of Growth Factors for Wound Healing,” Burns and Trauma 7 (2019): 10, 10.1186/s41038-019-0148-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kumar P., Kumar S., Udupa E. G. P., Kumar U., Rao P., and Honnegowda T. M., “Role of Angiogenesis and Angiogenic Factors in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing,” Plastic and Aesthetic Research 2 (2015): 243, 10.4103/2347-9264.165438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Desjardins‐Park H. E., Foster D. S., Longaker M. T., et al., “Fibroblasts and Wound Healing: An Update,” Regenerative Medicine 13 (2018): 491–495, 10.2217/rme-2018-0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. DiPietro L. A., “Angiogenesis and Wound Repair: When Enough Is Enough,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology 100 (2016): 979–984, 10.1189/jlb.4mr0316-102r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Frykberg R. G. and Banks J., “Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds,” Advances in Wound Care 4 (2015): 560–582, 10.1089/wound.2015.0635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Aldridge P., “Complications of Wound Healing: Causes and Prevention,” Companion Animal 20 (2015): 453–459, 10.12968/coan.2015.20.8.453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Anderson K. and Hamm R. L., “Factors That Impair Wound Healing,” Journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists 4 (2012): 84–91, 10.1016/j.jccw.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Atkin L., Bućko Z., Montero E. C., et al., “Implementing TIMERS: The Race Against Hard‐To‐Heal Wounds,” Journal of Wound Care 28 (2019): S1–S50, 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.sup3a.s1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Afsharfard A., Mozaffar M., Malekpour F., Beigiboroojeni A., and Rezaee M., “The Wound Healing Effects of Iloprost in Patients With Buerger's Disease: Claudication and Prevention of Major Amputations,” Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 13 (2011): 420–423. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Enoch S., Grey J. E., Harding K. G., et al., “ABC of Wound Healing Non‐Surgical and Drug Treatments,” BMJ 332 (2006): 900–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mthanti S. M. J., Pelle G., and Cremers N. A. J., “L‐Mesitran Foam: Evaluation of a New Wound Care Product,” Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine 2022 (2022): 1–5, 10.1155/2022/4833409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ahmadi M. and Khalili H., “Potential Benefits of Pentoxifylline on Wound Healing,” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 9 (2016): 129–142, 10.1586/17512433.2016.1109443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Babaei S. and Bayat M., “Pentoxifylline Accelerates Wound Healing Process by Modulating Gene Expression of MMP‐1, MMP‐3, and TIMP‐1 in Normoglycemic Rats,” Journal of Investigative Surgery 28 (2015): 196–201, 10.3109/08941939.2014.1002642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bhaskar H. N., Udupa S. L., Udupa A. L., et al., “Effect of Nifedipine and Amlodipine on Wound Healing in Rats,” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 48 (2004): 111–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Mojiri‐Forushani H., “The Role of Calcium Channel Blockers in Wound Healing,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 21 (2018): 1198–1199, 10.22038/ijbms.2018.29753.7182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Jakab Á., Emri T., Csillag K., et al., “The Negative Effect of Protein Phosphatase z1 Deletion on the Oxidative Stress Tolerance of Candida Albicans Is Synergistic With Betamethasone Exposure,” Journal of Fungi 7 (2021): 540, 10.3390/JOF7070540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wilkinson J. D., “Fusidic Acid in Dermatology,” British Journal of Dermatology 139 (1998): 37–40, 10.1046/J.1365-2133.1998.1390S3037.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mimura E. C. M., Favoreto J. P. M., Favero M. E., et al., “Silver Serum Levels in Burned Patients Treated With Silver Sulfadiazine and Its Toxicity on Inflammatory Cells,” Burns 46 (2020): 1120–1127, 10.1016/J.BURNS.2019.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Yousefian F., Hesari R., Jensen T., et al., “Antimicrobial Wound Dressings: A Concise Review for Clinicians,” Antibiotics 12 (2023): 1434, 10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS12091434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chin J. S., Madden L., Chew S. Y., and Becker D. L., “Drug Therapies and Delivery Mechanisms to Treat Perturbed Skin Wound Healing,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 149‐150 (2019): 2–18, 10.1016/j.addr.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Whittam A. J., Maan Z. N., Duscher D., et al., “Challenges and Opportunities in Drug Delivery for Wound Healing,” Advances in Wound Care 5 (2016): 79–88, 10.1089/wound.2014.0600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hassan I., Dorjay K., and Anwar P., “Pentoxifylline and Its Applications in Dermatology,” Indian Dermatology Online Journal 5 (2014): 510, 10.4103/2229-5178.142528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Di Renzo M., Pieragalli D., Meini S., et al., “Iloprost Treatment Reduces TNF‐Alpha Production and TNF‐RII Expression in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients Without Affecting IL6,” Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids 73 (2005): 405–410, 10.1016/J.PLEFA.2005.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. El‐Ela F. I. A., Farghali A. A., Mahmoud R. K., et al., “New Approach in Ulcer Prevention and Wound Healing Treatment Using Doxycycline and Amoxicillin/LDH Nanocomposites,” Scientific Reports 9 (2019): 6418, 10.1038/s41598-019-42842-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Fuller F. W., “The Side Effects of Silver Sulfadiazine,” Journal of Burn Care and Research 30 (2009): 464–470, 10.1097/BCR.0B013E3181A28C9B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mahomoodally M. F., “Traditional Medicines in Africa: An Appraisal of Ten Potent African Medicinal Plants,” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013 (2013): 1–14, 10.1155/2013/617459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. van Wyk A. S. and Prinsloo G., “Medicinal Plant Harvesting, Sustainability and Cultivation in South Africa,” Biological Conservation 227 (2018): 335–342, 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Oguntibeju O. O., “Medicinal Plants and Their Effects on Diabetic Wound Healing,” Veterinary World 12 (2019): 653–663, 10.14202/vetworld.2019.653-663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Sharma A., Khanna S., Kaur G., and Singh I., “Medicinal Plants and Their Components for Wound Healing Applications,” Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 7 (2021): 53, 10.1186/s43094-021-00202-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Agyare C., Dwobeng A. S., Agyepong N., et al., “Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Wound Healing Properties of Kigelia africana Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Wound Healing Properties of Kigelia africana (Lam.) Beneth. and Strophanthus hispidus DC,” Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2013 (2014): 692613, 10.1155/2013/692613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Karatay K. B., Muftuler F. Z. B., Law B., and Aras O., “Methanolic Extract of Kigelia africana and Wound Healing: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Wound Care 32, no. 6 (2023): 392–398, 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.6.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Vijayarathna S., “The Antimicrobial Efficacy of Elaeis guineensis: Characterization, In Vitro and In Vivo Studies,” Molecules 17 (2012): 4860–4877, 10.3390/molecules17054860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Kurepa J., Shull T. E., and Smalle J. A., “Quercetin Feeding Protects Plants Against Oxidative Stress,” F1000Research 5 (2016): 2430, 10.12688/f1000research.9659.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Achel D. G., Alcaraz M., Nyarko A. K., et al., “A Review of the Medicinal Properties and Applications of Pycnanthus Angolensis (WELW) Warb,” Pharmacology 2 (2012): 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Makgobole M. U., Mpofana N., and Ajao A. A. N., “Medicinal Plants for Dermatological Diseases: Ethnopharmacological Significance of Botanicals From West Africa in Skin Care,” Cosmetics 10 (2023): 167, 10.3390/cosmetics10060167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Grierson D. S. and Afolayan A. J., “Antibacterial Activity of Some Indigenous Plants Used for the Treatment of Wounds in the Eastern Cape, South Africa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 66 (1999): 103–106, 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00202-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Mabona U., “Antimicrobial Activity of Southern African Medicinal Plants With Dermatological Relevance,” University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa), 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 62. Annan K. and Houghton P. J., “Antibacterial, Antioxidant and Fibroblast Growth Stimulation of Aqueous Extracts of Ficus Asperifolia Miq. and Gossypium arboreum L., Wound‐Healing Plants of Ghana,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 119 (2008): 141–144, 10.1016/j.jep.2008.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Murti K. and Kumar U., “Enhancement of Wound Healing With Roots of Ficus racemosa L. in Albino Rats,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2 (2012): 276–280, 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60022-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Velmurugan C., “ Gossypium HERBACEUM Hasten Wound Healing in Dexamethasone Delayed Wound Healing Model in Rats,” International Journal of Phytopharmacology 17 (2013): 152–157. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Pather N. and Kramer B., “Bulbine Natalensis and Bulbine Frutescens Promote Cutaneous Wound Healing,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 144 (2012): 523–532, 10.1016/j.jep.2012.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Pather N., Viljoen A. M., and Kramer B., “A Biochemical Comparison of the In Vivo Effects of Bulbine Frutescens and Bulbine Natalensis on Cutaneous Wound Healing,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 133 (2011): 364–370, 10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Adetutu A., Morgan W. A., and Corcoran O., “Ethnopharmacological Survey and In Vitro Evaluation of Wound‐Healing Plants Used in South‐Western Nigeria,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 137 (2011): 50–56, 10.1016/j.jep.2011.03.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Fikru A., Makonnen E., Eguale T., Debella A., and Abie Mekonnen G., “Evaluation of In Vivo Wound Healing Activity of Methanol Extract of Achyranthes aspera L,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 143 (2012): 469–474, 10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ndhlala A. R., Ghebrehiwot H. M., Ncube B., et al., “Antimicrobial, Anthelmintic Activities and Characterisation of Functional Phenolic Acids of Achyranthes Aspera Linn.: A Medicinal Plant Used for the Treatment of Wounds and Ringworm in East Africa,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 6 (2015): 274, 10.3389/FPHAR.2015.00274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Tamokou J. d. D., Simo Mpetga D. J., Keilah Lunga P., Tene M., Tane P., and Kuiate J. R., “Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Ethyl Acetate Extract, Fractions and Compounds From Stem Bark of Albizia Adianthifolia (Mimosoideae),” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 12 (2012): 99, 10.1186/1472-6882-12-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Marume A., Matope G., Katsande S., et al., “Wound Healing Properties of Selected Plants Used in Ethnoveterinary Medicine,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 8 (2017): 544, 10.3389/fphar.2017.00544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Yahaya E. S., Cordier W., Steenkamp P. A., and Steenkamp V., “Attenuation of Oxidative Stress and Artificial Wound Closure in C2C12 Myoblasts Induced by Sequential Extracts of Boerhavia diffusa ,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 70 (2018): 111–123, 10.1111/jphp.12833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Fouché M., Willers C., Hamman S., Malherbe C., and Steenekamp J., “Wound Healing Effects of Aloe Muth‐Muth: In Vitro Investigations Using Immortalized Human Keratinocytes (HaCaT),” Biology 9 (2020): 350, 10.3390/biology9110350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Oryan A., Mohammadalipour A., Moshiri A., and Tabandeh M. R., “Topical Application of aloe vera Accelerated Wound Healing, Modeling, and Remodelling,” Annals of Plastic Surgery 77 (2016): 37–46, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Takzaree N., Hadjiakhondi A., Hassanzadeh G., Rouini M. R., Manayi A., and Zolbin M. M., “Transforming Growth Factor‐β (TGF‐β) Activation in Cutaneous Wounds After Topical Application of aloe vera Gel,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 94 (2016): 1285–1290, 10.1139/CJPP-2015-0460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Matyanga C. M. J., Morse G. D., Gundidza M., and Nhachi C. F. B., “African Potato (Hypoxis Hemerocallidea): A Systematic Review of Its Chemistry, Pharmacology and Ethno Medicinal Properties,” BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 20 (2020): 182, 10.1186/s12906-020-02956-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Neto Júnior J. d. C. S., Souza Neto Júnior J. d. C., Estevão L. R. d. M., et al., “Ointment of Ximenes Americana Promotes Acceleration of Wound Healing in Rats,” Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira 34 (2019): e201900307, 10.1590/s0102-865020190030000007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kruger J., Katerere D., Eloff J. N., et al., “Topically Applied Terminalia Sericea (Combretaceae) Leaf Extract and Terminoic Acid on Infected Wounds Lead to Better Wound Healing Outcomes Than Gentamicin in an Animal Model,” 2018.
- 79. Gulumian M., Yahaya E. S., and Steenkamp V., “African Herbal Remedies With Antioxidant Activity: A Potential Resource Base for Wound Treatment,” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2018 (2018): 4089541, 10.1155/2018/4089541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Steenkamp V., Mathivha E., Gouws M. C., and van Rensburg C. E. J., “Studies on Antibacterial, Antioxidant and Fibroblast Growth Stimulation of Wound Healing Remedies From South Africa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 95 (2004): 353–357, 10.1016/j.jep.2004.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Adewuyi A. M., Yekeen T. A., Durodola F., et al., “Terminalia Avicennioides as a Potential Candidate for Pharmaceutical Industry: A Review,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 6 (2015): 748–754. [Google Scholar]
- 82. Ilango K., Yoganandam P., Usha K., et al., “Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of Hexane and Methanolic Extract of Fruit Pulp of Momordica Balsamina Linn in Albino Rats,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (2010): 88–92. [Google Scholar]
- 83. Omokhua‐Uyi A. G. and Van Staden J., “Phytomedicinal Relevance of South African Cucurbitaceae Species and Their Safety Assessment: A Review,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 259 (2020): 112967, 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Alqasoumi S. I., “Anti‐Inflammatory and Wound Healing Activity of Fagonia Schweinfurthii Alcoholic Extract Herbal Gel on Albino Rats,” African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 5 (2011): 1996–2001, 10.5897/AJPP11.190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Boniface P. K., Ferreira S. B., and Kaiser C. R., “Recent Trends in Phytochemistry, Ethnobotany and Pharmacological Significance of Alchornea Cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Muell. Arg,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 191 (2016): 216–244, 10.1016/j.jep.2016.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Ogwang P. E., Nyafuono J., Agwaya M., Omujal F., Tumusiime H. R., and Kyakulaga A. H., “Preclinical Efficacy and Safety of Herbal Formulation for Management of Wounds,” African Health Sciences 11 (2011): 524–529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Bello I., Shehu M. W., Musa M., Zaini Asmawi M., and Mahmud R., “ Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth. (Sausage Tree): Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Review of a Quintessential African Traditional Medicinal Plant,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 189 (2016): 253–276, 10.1016/j.jep.2016.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Lakshana S., Vijayalakshmi S., Dinakar J., et al., “Effects of Tagetes Erecta Gel on Experimentally Induced Oral Ulcer Model in Rats,” International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 11 (2020): 1844–1848, 10.26452/ijrps.v11i2.2090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Sachdeva K., Garg P., Singhal M., et al., “Pharmacological Evaluation of Jatropha Curcas Linn (Stem Bark) for Wound Healing Potential in Rats,” Pharmacology 3 (2011): 251–264. [Google Scholar]
- 90. Sasidharan S., “Molecules Wound Healing Potential of Elaeis Guineensis Jacq Leaves in an Infected Albino Rat Model,” Molecules (2010): 3186–3199, 10.3390/molecules15053186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Adeniyi O. V., Olaifa F., Emikpe B., et al., “Experimental Evaluation of the Wound‐Healing and Antioxidant Activities of Tamarind ( Tamarindus indica ) Pulp and Leaf Meal in the African Catfish ( Clarias gariepinus ),” Acta Veterinaria Eurasia 44, no. 2 (2018): 63–72, 10.26650/actavet.2018.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Dirar A. I., Adhikari‐Devkota A., Kunwar R. M., et al., “Genus Blepharis (Acanthaceae): A Review of Ethnomedicinally Used Species, and Their Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Activities,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 265 (2021): 113255, 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Yadav D. K., Bharitkar Y. P., Chatterjee K., et al., “Importance of Neem Leaf: An Insight Into Its Role in Combating Diseases,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 54 (2016): 708–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Dunnill C., Patton T., Brennan J., et al., “Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Wound Healing: The Functional Role of ROS and Emerging ROS‐Modulating Technologies for Augmentation of the Healing Process,” International Wound Journal 14 (2017): 89–96, 10.1111/IWJ.12557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Dhall S., do D., Garcia M., et al., “A Novel Model of Chronic Wounds: Importance of Redox Imbalance and Biofilm‐Forming Bacteria for Establishment of Chronicity,” PLoS One 9 (2014): e109848, 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0109848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Komakech R., Matsabisa M. G., and Kang Y., “The Wound Healing Potential of Aspilia africana (Pers.) C. D. Adams (Asteraceae),” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2019 (2019): 7957860, 10.1155/2019/7957860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Zhao G., Usui M. L., Lippman S. I., et al., “Biofilms and Inflammation in Chronic Wounds,” Advances in Wound Care 2 (2013): 389–399, 10.1089/WOUND.2012.0381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Ebrahimi F., Torbati M., Mahmoudi J., and Valizadeh H., “Medicinal Plants as Potential Haemostatic Agents,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 23 (2020): 10–23, 10.18433/JPPS30446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Okoli C. O., Akah P. A., and Okoli A. S., “Potentials of Leaves of Aspilia africana (Compositae) in Wound Care: An Experimental Evaluation,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 7 (2007): 24, 10.1186/1472-6882-7-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Mahmoud N. N., Hamad K., al Shibitini A., et al., “Investigating Inflammatory Markers in Wound Healing: Understanding Implications and Identifying Artifacts,” ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science 7 (2024): 18–27, 10.1021/ACSPTSCI.3C00336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Schilrreff P. and Alexiev U., “Chronic Inflammation in Non‐Healing Skin Wounds and Promising Natural Bioactive Compounds Treatment,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23 (2022): 4928, 10.3390/IJMS23094928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Bender E. C., Tareq H. S., Suggs L., et al., “Inflammation: A Matter of Immune Cell Life and Death,” Npj Biomedical Innovations 2 (2025): 1, 10.1038/s44385-025-00010-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Sikandan A., Shinomiya T., and Nagahara Y., “Ashwagandha Root Extract Exerts Anti‐Inflammatory Effects in HaCaT Cells by Inhibiting the MAPK/NF‐κB Pathways and by Regulating Cytokines,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine 42 (2018): 425–434, 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Soares C. L. R., Wilairatana P., Silva L. R., et al., “Biochemical Aspects of the Inflammatory Process: A Narrative Review,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 168 (2023): 115764, 10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2023.115764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Si‐Yin Wong R., Tan T., Srinivasan D. K., et al., “The Role of Cytokines in Wound Healing: From Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Applications,” Exploration of Immunology 5 (2025): 1003183, 10.37349/ei.2025.1003183. [DOI]
- 106. Ayissi Owona B., Njayou N. F., Laufer S., Moundipa P. F., and Schluesener H. J., “A Fraction of Stem Bark Extract of Entada africana Suppresses Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Inflammation in RAW 264.7 Cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 149 (2013): 162–168, 10.1016/j.jep.2013.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Arulprakash K., Murugan R., Ponrasu T., Iyappan K., Gayathri V. S., and Suguna L., “Efficacy of Ageratum conyzoides on Tissue Repair and Collagen Formation in Rats,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 37 (2012): 418–424, 10.1111/J.1365-2230.2011.04285.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Bhosale S. D., MayyaA J., GowdaK H., et al., “Wound Healing Activity of Withania Leaf Paste and Its Gel in Wistar Albino Rats—An Experimental Evaluation,” Wound Practice and Research 31 (2023): 182–189, 10.33235/WPR.31.4.182-189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Khedgikar V., Kushwaha P., Gautam J., et al., “Withaferin A: A Proteasomal Inhibitor Promotes Healing After Injury and Exerts Anabolic Effect on Osteoporotic Bone,” Cell Death and Disease 4 (2013): e778, 10.1038/cddis.2013.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. McCarty S. M. and Percival S. L., “Proteases and Delayed Wound Healing,” Advances in Wound Care 2 (2013): 438–447, 10.1089/wound.2012.0370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Baidoo M. F., Mensah A. Y., Ossei P. P. S., Asante‐Kwatia E., and Amponsah I. K., “Wound Healing, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of the Leaf and Stem Bark of Entada africana Guill. and Perr,” South African Journal of Botany 137 (2021): 52–59, 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.09.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Muley B. P., Khadabadi S. S., and Banarase N. B., “Phytochemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Calendula officinalis Linn (Asteraceae): A Review,” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 8 (2009): 48090, 10.4314/tjpr.v8i5.48090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Agyare C., Boakye Y. D., Bekoe E. O., Hensel A., Dapaah S. O., and Appiah T., “Review: African Medicinal Plants With Wound Healing Properties,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 177 (2016): 85–100, 10.1016/j.jep.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Zahidin N. S., Saidin S., Zulkifli R. M., Muhamad I. I., Ya'akob H., and Nur H., “A Review of Acalypha indica L. (Euphorbiaceae) as Traditional Medicinal Plant and Its Therapeutic Potential,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 207 (2017): 146–173, 10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Ganeshkumar M., Ponrasu T., Krithika R., Iyappan K., Gayathri V. S., and Suguna L., “Topical Application of Acalypha indica Accelerates Rat Cutaneous Wound Healing by Up‐Regulating the Expression of Type I and III Collagen,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 142 (2012): 14–22, 10.1016/j.jep.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Xu F., Zhang C., and Graves D. T., “Abnormal Cell Responses and Role of TNF‐α in Impaired Diabetic Wound Healing,” BioMed Research International 2013 (2013): 754802, 10.1155/2013/754802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Calmon‐Hamaty F., Combe B., Hahne M., and Morel J., “Lymphotoxin α Stimulates Proliferation and Pro‐Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion of Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts,” Cytokine 53 (2011): 207–214, 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Freitas M. O., Fonseca A. P., Dias C. C., et al., “Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF‐α) Blockage Reduces Acute Inflammation and Delayed Wound Healing in Oral Ulcer of Rats,” Inflammopharmacology 30 (2022): 1781–1798, 10.1007/S10787-022-01046-3/TABLES/4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Orafidiya L. O., Agbani E. O., Abereoje O. A., Awe T., Abudu A., and Fakoya F. A., “An Investigation Into the Wound‐Healing Properties of Essential Oil of Ocimum Gratissimum Linn,” Journal of Wound Care 12 (2003): 331–334, 10.12968/jowc.2003.12.9.26537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Ozoemena Ifedioramma U., Babalola S. A., Joseohat Onu E., et al., “Evaluation of the Healing Properties of the Crude Extract of Ocimum Gratissimum Leaves on Excision Wound in Rabbit Bucks,” Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery 17 (2022): 95–100, 10.30500/IVSA.2022.320962.1286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Ayuk S. M., Abrahamse H., and Houreld N. N., “The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Diabetic Wound Healing in Relation to Photobiomodulation,” Journal of Diabetes Research 2016 (2016): 1–9, 10.1155/2016/2897656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Majtan J., Bohova J., Garcia‐Villalba R., et al., “Fir Honeydew Honey Flavonoids Inhibit TNF‐α‐Induced MMP‐9 Expression in Human Keratinocytes: A New Action of Honey in Wound Healing,” Archives of Dermatological Research 305 (2013): 619–627, 10.1007/s00403-013-1385-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Francesko A., Soares da Costa D., Reis R. L., Pashkuleva I., and Tzanov T., “Functional Biopolymer‐Based Matrices for Modulation of Chronic Wound Enzyme Activities,” Acta Biomaterialia 9 (2013): 5216–5225, 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Riella K. R., Marinho R. R., Santos J. S., et al., “Anti‐Inflammatory and Cicatrizing Activities of Thymol, a Monoterpene of the Essential Oil From Lippia Gracilis, in Rodents,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 143 (2012): 656–663, 10.1016/j.jep.2012.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Hussain G., Rasul A., Anwar H., et al., “Role of Plant Derived Alkaloids and Their Mechanism in Neurodegenerative Disorders,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 14 (2018): 341–357, 10.7150/ijbs.23247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Fetse J., Kyekyeku J., Dueve E., and Mensah K., “Wound Healing Activity of Total Alkaloidal Extract of the Root Bark of Alstonia Boonei (Apocynacea),” British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 4 (2014): 2642–2652, 10.9734/bjpr/2014/13952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Gould A. N., Penny C. B., Patel C. C., and Candy G. P., “Enhanced Cutaneous Wound Healing by Senecio Serratuloides (Asteraceae/Compositae) in a Pig Model,” South African Journal of Botany 100 (2015): 63–68, 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Pastar I., Liang L., Sawaya A. P., et al., “Preclinical Models for Wound‐Healing Studies,” Skin Tissue Models 2018 (2018): 223–253, 10.1016/B978-0-12-810545-0.00010-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Stoellinger H. M. and Alexanian A. R., “Modifications to the Transwell Migration/Invasion Assay Method That Eases Assay Performance and Improves the Accuracy,” Assay and Drug Development Technologies 20 (2022): 75–82, 10.1089/ADT.2021.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Griffin K. H., Fok S. W., and Kent Leach J., “Strategies to Capitalize on Cell Spheroid Therapeutic Potential for Tissue Repair and Disease Modeling,” Npj Regenerative Medicine 7 (2022): 1, 10.1038/s41536-022-00266-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Wang Z., Zhao F., Lang H., et al., “Organoids in Skin Wound Healing,” Burns and Trauma 13 (2025): tkae077, 10.1093/BURNST/TKAE077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Kim T., Lim J., Jeong J., et al., “Wound Healing in Human Skin Equivalents Reconstructed With Biopolymers Under Fine‐Dust Exposure,” Polymers 17 (2025): 901, 10.3390/POLYM17070901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Neves L. M. G., Wilgus T. A., and Bayat A., “In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Approaches for Investigation of Skin Scarring: Human and Animal Models,” Advances in Wound Care 12, no. 2 (2023): 97–116, 10.1089/WOUND.2021.0139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Masson‐Meyers D. S., Andrade T. A. M., Caetano G. F., et al., “Experimental Models and Methods for Cutaneous Wound Healing Assessment,” International Journal of Experimental Pathology 101 (2020): 21–37, 10.1111/iep.12346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Ghanbari M., Salkovskiy Y., and Carlson M. A., “The Rat as an Animal Model in Chronic Wound Research: An Update,” Life Sciences 351 (2024): 122783, 10.1016/J.LFS.2024.122783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Bull R. H., Clements D., Collarte A. J., and Harding K. G., “A Novel Randomized Trial Protocol for Evaluating Wound Healing Interventions,” Advances in Wound Care 12 (2023): 671–679, 10.1089/WOUND.2023.0058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Ganesan O. and Orgill D. P., “An Overview of Recent Clinical Trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Therapies,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 13 (2024): 7655, 10.3390/JCM13247655/S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
